Baybars
5:37
Added: 5 years ago
From: debashir
Views: 60,688
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (188)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mostly mamluk forses consisted from turks (from central asia and southern caucasus turks) and also other coucasians georgians and armenians(tower mamluks).

  • Qazaq Halki oz kucin ali korsetedi. Biz gasyrlar boyi geo-politikada manizdi rol' atqardyq. Bizdin uahitimiz ali keler. Inshallah.

  • Comment removed

  • И еще Бурдж оглы это арабское произношение Берш улы то есть сын рода Берш так что не надо придумывать велосипед настоящие кочевники настоящие кыпчаки настоящие гунны и скифы это как раз казахские племена и роды остальные лишь носители языка но не крови.Всем кавказцам ебите осликов, всем татарам делайте чак чак, крымским татарам меньше жрать сало, киргизам бить в бубен, русским помнить своих предков, казахам гордится Бейбарсом

  • Для всех информация мавзолей Бейбарса реконструировали казахские бизнесмены из рода берш одного из них я знаю.Так вот ни одного татара, черкеса и других там не было все говорят о родстве а мавзолей восстановить денег нема))) Очень интересно что все арабы которые там находились называли этих ребят потомками мамлюков видать в памяти остался облик их правителей мамлюков.Безусловно Бейбарс  кыпчак.

  • Baybars dedem Türktür Memlük devletine Devleti Türkü denmesini istemiştir. Yani Memlük Türk Devleti ismini koymuştur.Sizin atanız Moğol olabilir ama benim Atam TÜRK.

  • Mongol History inspired the movie, Conan the Barbarian. Thats why Conan was surrounded by Mongols in that movie. Except they switched out the Mongol slave with a german slave.

  • Baybars was most likely Mongoloid. His tribe was conquered by the Mongols and its children no taller than the wheels of a wagon were sold off as slaves. Egyptian Sultans purchased these slaves and employed them as Mamluk cavalry which were eventually used to counter the Mongol Cavalry. These Cavalrymen then overthrew the local Sultans thus creating the Mamluk dynasty.

  • @Lordofthenipplerings He wasn't mongol or mongoloid, he was kipcak/cuman, SULTAN BAYBARS

  • @Askar9992 He was most likely Mongoloid or a least his paternal ancestors. Kipchaks and Cumens dont speak indo-european. They speak an Altaic language.

  • @Lordofthenipplerings Cumans were not mongoloids at all, may be some of them, cumans were conquered by mongols & enslaved then mongols sold them to Europe & Africa as slaves

  • ну вопервых в то время этноса казах не существовало,именуемые кипчаки это тюркоязычные племена включая башкир и татар.что касается казахов это киргизкий род который после революции 1917 получил тереторию и стал именоватся казахстаном.

  • @kassenainur казахи к киргизам мало какое отношение имеют, казахи и ногайцы один народ

  • @kassenainur я русский и то знаю что казахи-казактар, может и не так давно и возникли как нация под этим этнонимом, но их племена и роды насчитывают многовековую историю, и не от каких киргиз они не произошли, у них древняя история они знают своих предков минимум до 7 колена а встречал таких которые ведут родословную с 10 века. Прежде чем что то ляпнуть лучше книжки почитай убогий

  • Я кипчак и горжусь этим!

  • казактар алга

    

  • baybars is kipchak Turk , all over the world , considered this , baybars have long blonde hair end blue eyes , this is a typical of kipchaks .

  • Beybars was pure Mongol research true history.

  • @arslanbeklord lol, he wasn't... mongols sold him as kipcak slave to Egypt

  • @Askar9992 Yes It is my fault.

  • t 4e brat owibsia moi drug iz roda kipwak odin moi drug nogaets ia sam argyn ewe odin drug naiman i est adai v osnovnom konirati mnogo i mi vse kazahi v 15 veke mi stali kazahami do etogo polovina iz nas bili mangolami polovina tiurkskie narodi iz nih obrazavalas natsia kazakh vse mi iz sakov skifov gunnov usiunov potom tiurki potom mangolo turkestan turan zalataia arda ak arda i kazakh

  • da ya s roda argyn moi drug s roda kipwak odin moi drug s roda nogai mi vse kazakhi

  • proud myself its turanic power and Allah is most graciuos most mercically

  • Че вы спорите Бейбарс казах он родилься западном казахстане ему памятник поставили г.Атырау если вы себя называете сильным народом вы кавказцы ногайцы башкиры посмотрите на свою территорию она какмола е видно карте и нет у вас незовесимости под тенью россия

  • I believe that Allah gives the crown of the earth to some nations in specific times. Baybars caused the decline of Mongols and started the rise of Turks.

    Crown of the Turks were unfortunately over... Will it begin again? I dont know :(

  • egypt was the strongest country from 969 - 1517 in islamic civilization

    and i dont care about this shit who talk about original of our our leaders

    and if they arent egyptian thats mean

    obama is Kenyan

    or hetler was swedish

    or stalin was Georgian

    the warriors were from egypt

    and taxes toooo

    they die for egypt as they live

    and they didnt die for other shit country try to steeling our history now

  • @haithamsalah1 Hitler was Austrian not swedish.

  • @88Atlan ТО есть все народы татарские пошли именно отказахов???Так я вас понял?То есть все туфта(садовники,бахчеводы.....­,как вы выражаетесь),а вы "арийцы"Ну,ладно,считайте себя таковыми.Я вряд ли смогу с вами дискутировать.

  • @MegaLenur Бейбарс был из Дешт-и-кыпчака кыпчаком он полюбому не мог быть, Крым земля татаров не исконное.

  • @88Atlan И ещё.ПРо былые времена,о которых вы говорите,я так понимаю,вы имеете в виду нашествие Атиллы на Европу,и на Рим?Да это было.Но что ж вы так обособляетесь на казахах?ТОгда их просто не было.Был один народ-кипчаки.Потомками,которы­х являетесь не только вы.Я-ногаец.И по праву считаю себя прямым его потомком.Карачаевец,кумык,башк­ир,каз.татарин,не менее вашего являются его потомками.И когда это мы вышли из под вашего контроля?И когда вы контроливали нас?

  • @88Atlan Перечитайте нашу переписку с debashir.Я общаюсь с арабами и не слышал,чтобы они называли его казахом.Татарином называют,а казахом не слышал. А вообще у меня был диалог по этому поводу.Перечитайте,пожалуйста.­.Да,добавлю.На счёт венгров.Они тоже признают в своём народе,именно "татарской крови"И не разу я не слышал о казахской.В те времена,когда они туда перекачевали,казахов,как отдельной нации и не было.Моя дальняя родственница замужем за венгра.

  • Хотя,кто знает?Сами же говорите,что часть казахов имеет ногайлинские корни.Это говорит о том,что мы всё таки,в прошлом,один народ.Видать какой то род одного народа перерос в нацию и обособился.так,что все мы имеем право считать его своим представителем.Казахи же самый крупный народ,который как то сохранил свою кипчакскую идентичность.

  • @MegaLenur В эпосе "Ер Таргын" общем для каракалпаков, ногаев и казаков, соотнесенный с историческими событиями 15-го века, говорится: Убив одного бека, Таргын бежит в Крым. Далее, покинув Крым, он живет в Поволжье, ханстве Ханзады-хана, и теперь родным краем называет уже Крым. Когда он лежит раненый, то вспоминает своих друзей и Крым и говорит: "Раненым я потому лежу, что родной мой город далеко". Выздоровев, он едет на поиски покинутых им родичей и считает теперь своей родиной уже Поволжье.

  • @MegaLenur То есть для Таргына все разделенные ханства состaвляют один народ, одну родину, одно целое.

    Не смог найти русского варианта книги, однако если питаете интерес к общему прошлому казаков и ногайцев, то прошу прочитать: "Казахское ханство и Ногайская Орда во второй половине XV-XVI в."; А.Исин.

  • @MegaLenur Казаки Киши жуза(иначе называемые алшын или ногайлы) и каракалпаки,прежде были одним народом, история ордынская и послеордынская, вплоть до джунгарского нашествия - общая. Как писал один каракалпак на нукуском форуме:"Я помню, как в детстве бабушка исполняла песню плач о разделе народа, когда алшыны уходили к казахам,а мангыты к крымцам.Эту стон, который песнью зовется пели казахи два века с лишним.Помню как я тоже плакал от горя,сжавшего сердце.Не знаю,пели ли вы такую. Мы пели...

  • А есть ли в русском варианте,та книга,которую вы мне советуете прочитать.Если есть,то объязательно прочитаю.А в 13 веке Крымское ханство всё таки было.Оно было,правда,не исламским.Крымский юрт входил тогда в состав золотой орды.Смотрел в Википедии"Крымское ханство"Бейбарс даже предлагал крымцам сделать ислам государственной религией.Позже это сделал хан Узбек.

  • @MegaLenur Ты чо несешь? в 13 веке никакого крымского ханства не было до Золотой Орды на территории Крыма и почти всего Казахстана была империя половцев(кыпчаки), и педлагал он там именно кыпчакам и не каким другим, и как ты осмелился сказать "смотрел в википедии" тебя же за это засмеют, википедия это один из самых доверенных источников для любого форумчанина, я если захочу магу написать там что Бейбарыс был эфиопом.

  • @TsarSpargapis В основном я с тобой согласен.Бей барс,действительно был не татарином,ни казахом.....,а кипчаком,к коим все эти народы и относились и относятся.(Жаль,что мы сами об этом забыли)А на счёт Крымсккого ханства,ты всё-же не прав.Да он тогда не назывался ханством.Это был крымский юрт Золтой орды.В 1262 году Бей барс обратился к Хану Берке(тогдашний правитель крымского юрта),как к своим соотечественникам с предложением принять ислам.Кстати в Крыму есть мечеть Бей барса.

  • @TsarSpargapis Этим я хочу сказать,что всё ж какое-то гос.образование в Крыму всё ж было.И оно было конечно же,этнически кипчакским.Но не Дешт и Кипчак.Его на тот момент уничтожили монголо татары руками самих же кипчаков,входящих в монголо татарское войско.Например в 1299 году известен опустошительный поход Ногая на эти земли.

  • @MegaLenur Ну и при чем тут татары? во всех инфах везде пишется что Бейбарс с Дешт-и-кыпчака, кыпчаки стали входить в монгольское войско только после захвата Дешт-и-кыпчака, после Дешт-и-кыпчака появилась Алтын Орда Крымское ханство намного позже появилось.

  • @MegaLenur татары вообще пришлый народ бывший истребляемый Чингис-ханом.

  • @88Atlan Бей барс,конечно же кипчак,но почему же казах??????Географическое положение казахов было таково,что они никак не пересекались даже с европейскими народами.С кипчакской группы наиболее активны в военно-политической сфере были,в основном крымские татары,государство,которых влияло на европейскую политику.Вот Бей барс и был из их числа.(Кстати военная власть у кр.татар была сконцентрирована у ногайцев)

  • @MegaLenur К вашим сведениям, младший жуз казаков что расположен в большинстве своём в западной части Казакстана имеет ногайлинское происхождение, до образования Казакского Ханства эта часть Казакстана называлась Ногай Ели. По сути ногайлинцы перешли под более сильный союз, тем самым дав основу младшему жузу казаков, тем самым завершив образование трёх жузов, потому он и младший, что образовался позже всех.

  • @debashir Возможно.Собственно у всех кипчаков одно происхождение.Но,тем не менее много народов считающих себя кипчаками.(пол северного КАВКАЗА,В ТОМ ЧИСЛЕ)И когда всех исторически известных людей,казахи называют своимим представителями на основании их кипчакского происхождения.,то это уже становится смешным.Исторически так сложилось,что одни кипчаки находились в центре мировых событий,а другие оставались в стороне.Что касается казахов,то их активного участия в каких то событиях я и не припомню

  • @MegaLenur да, географически так сложилось, что казакская история более связана с центрально-азиатским регионом, чем с европейским. Вообще мне кажется, когда русские заняли волжский регион, оказалось что кто-то в центре в событий, а другие остались в стороне. О роли казахов (казаков) и их активного участия советую прочитать книгу- "Russia's steppe frontier: the making of a colonial empire, 1500-1800", автор- Michael Khodarkovsky. С уважением.

  • @MegaLenur моё мнение по поводу этнической принадлежности Байбарса можно найти в описании этого видео, и считаю не этичным называть Байбарса казаком, так как такого народа на момент его рождения по факту в 13-м веке не существовало, как и крымских татар вкупе с Крымским Ханством.

  • @debashir ТОлько,просьба,не воспримите моё мнение,как оскорбление.А на счёт присоединения ногайцев к более сильному союзу,то у ногайцев было и своё собственное государство.Это крымское ханство.Где у них была сконцентрирована власть.ИМ удалось не только победить,но и ориентировать под свой союз все племена Тавриды.В том числе и греков с итальянцами.(Сейчас они называют себя крым. татарами-ялы бойляр)И это ханство было куда активнее и сильнее.Это,земляк,история.Фак­ты.

  • @debashir Собственно,как и то ,что сейчас эти же,кр.татары ничего собой не представляют,как самостоятельный народ.

  • yes beybars is kıpcak but kazaks are not kıpcak they were mixed mongols and turkic

    kıpcaks or cumans were blonde turkic

  • he is Turkic from Crimea and he is Founder of Mamluks!

  • Казахский род КИПЧАК... БЕРШ!

  • accordingh to the historical resources beybars was blue eyed

  • Султан Бейбарс Кыпшак!!кыпшаки это Казахи!!!!Мен Кыпшакпын!!!

  • Beybars were Turkic not arabic

  • @GrandmasterTigerfist it is impossible to claim that he is Arabic ^_^

  • автор напишите плиз где какая часть а то не понятно откуда начать смотреть

  • bybers Mongol? never read in any Arabic resource about such thing!

  • @mewoone baibar was just born in crimea, he was sold as slave 5 years old.He was an kazakh turk,his root was from kazakhstan.

  • Baibars from is Crimea.He is Kipchak and Burjogli clan.Burjoglis today live in Georgia Borchali.But all Borchalians not Burjogli.

  • ON iz kipchaksih stepei...iz roda Berish govoryat,.

    v Atyrau est emu pamyatnik..

  • жақсы кинолардың бірі, аталарымыз батыр болган, оларға жету үшін тарихимызды оқып, шетел құдайларына сенбей, өзіміздің тәңірімізге қайта бұрылуымыз керек, аруақтарымызды сыйлап.

  • sINCE WHEN ARE CIRCASSIANS MONGOLS??...beybars could not have been of mongol descent.

  • @am1966ath - Beybars war a Kipchak Turk from the Eurasian Steppes like most other Mamlukes

  • @matmohair1 moslim warriors

  • @am1966ath who said he was Circasiian? Serious sources claim he was a Kipchak-Turk:

    i. Al-Maqrizi, Al Selouk Leme'refatt Dewall al-Melouk, p.520/vol.1

    ii. Ibn Taghri, al-Nujum al-Zahirah Fi Milook Misr wa al-Qahirah, Year 675H /vol.7

    iii. Abu al-Fida, The Concise History of Humanity , Tarikh Abu al-Fida pp.71-87/ year 676H

    iv. Ibn Iyas , Badai Alzuhur Fi Wakayi Alduhur , abridged and edited by Dr. M. Aljayar, Almisriya Lilkitab, Cairo 2007, ISBN 977-419-623-6

    (The list can be extended).

  • @debashir most probably yes..

  • umm how u gonna say that this man is a kazakh when my friends are he's decent and they live in syria with the family tree and everything and there circassian and they speak circassian and they will be very mad if they see this!!!! and beybars is a circassian name... oh u didnt see that comming right i just love how everyone claims everything they want...

  • @zkorte who does care whether bunch of people would mad if see this, we're speaking here about some real history facts, Baybars was a Kipchak-Turk, I've given some sources of historians of those times. Baybars is pretty much Turkish name meaning Mr. Show Leopard, which can be found in Altay Mountains the motherland of Kipchak-Turks. As for Circassians the whole Caucasus doesn't have a single snow leopard it never lived there.

  • Sultan beybars was kazak. he was born near river sirdaria in kazakhstan! Who says another things they just hates kazakh!

  • sultan Beybars [1223-1277] of the Mamluk dynasty of Egypt was the greatest leader of the dynasty he is remeberd for the courageus battle at Ain Al Jaluth [well of golaith] in 1260 against the mongols they won a supreme victory over them after the battle they whent on the offensive against the crusaders but he died in 1277 so this was left to his succesers to finish off what was remained of the crusader Port of Tyre in 1291 this was acomplished too Mamluks did islam Two magnificent services

  • yes Beybars was from Kipchak Kazakhstan but was chronicled as being very tall and having one blue eye as the other was covered by a cataract in his appearance he seemed circassian.

  • Beybars was Kazakh read history he is Kepchak (kazakh)

  • yes beybars is kıpcak but kazaks are not kıpcak they were mixed mongols and turkic

    kıpcaks or cumans were blonde turkic

  • U stupid everybody in central asia was mixed of mongol and turkick blood. what is your claim. fact is he is Kazakh from Kazakh tribe called Bersh.

    And that tribe Bersh, has got roots from Mongols. Everyone is mixed with Mongols, even Tamerlan, that Uzbeks claim, he was Uzbek. So eventually ur argument is pointless, whe only people who can claim fro Beybaris only Kazakhs or Mongols

  • @alekehamas kypwak is the tribe in kazakh nation

  • @alekehamas TATAR

  • @alekehamas kipcak are not kazakhs

  • Please, stop write this bull-shits.

  • Yaşasın Sultanımız Baybars

  • vay anasını be ruslar kadar olamadık. henüz bir tek ciddi tarih filmmimiz yok. harbi rezillik

  • I AM A KIPCHAK TURK!!

  • baybars was KIPCHAK

  • Tell me what Beybars means in Turkic language? and is it still used name among Turkic nations?

  • Baybars:Ancient Turks feed that Tiger.And yes it is still used name.

  • Baybars means Anceint Turks feed that tiger?

    where was he from? where he was kiddnaped and became a slave?

  • Comment removed

  • yes baybars mean Tiger.he was from North Black Sea.(Kipchak)he(5 years old) was kidnapped by Mongols and they sold him to byzantine merchants and became slave.then he was brought to Egypt.

  • Well some say that Baybars was Circassian and Circassians allways lived near the shores of Black sea, and Baybars is Arabized name, his reall name is Peipas, means "waits for the enemy", and there were TWO Mamluke Baybars in Egypt the Second was for sure Circassian but the Arguing about the first Baybars.

  • i dont think so.yes his real name is Peipas.But Circassians lived near East of Black Sea.but Eastern Desthi Kipchak Turks lived North of black sea.look this map:watch?v=vWb6gkXZtfQ&featur­e=related.

  • Baybars was bridegroom of Berke Khan who emperor of the Golden Horde and grandchild of Chengiz Khan.While hunting, Baybars murdered Kutuz and took his place as sultan.and he changed name of state be Egypt-Turk State.

  • well it is something that you can argue about, nobody knows for sure that he came from north black sea or east of black sea, there were natives living there before kypchak turks came there.

    it is an assumption that he was kypchak

  • No. Beybars couldn't be Circassian. Egypt Mamluks were divided into 2 regiments: Bahri (Turks) & Burji (Caucasians). This division is meant in the movie. Beybars was at once sent to Bahri.

  • Yeah, but the thing is that in Burji dynasty there were a Circassian Beybars also, and the Beybars who was in Bahri dynasty was kiddnaped from black sea reigon of the caucasus

  • Yes. This movie is about the kidnapped one - Baybars I Bandukdari (ruled 1260 - 1277).

  • The thing is the area he was kiddnaped from was Circassian area, so some say he was Circassian

  • But his motherland was Crimea, not Caucases. Being a Sultan, he several times sent donations to the Crimean city of Solhat, which he considered his native land. The ruins of the mosque built on his money are still there.

  • mavikilen is kurd bastard.

  • SUPER FILM.DANKE SOVET Union!

  • Baybars KAZAKH

  • baibars was a kipchak turk enslaved

  • mongols end was in ain galot war

    with the egyptian army and mumluks

  • Beybarys- on ADAYec

  • buthabuthe sure doesn't know much about Turkish history, because The turkish identity doesn't just consist of Oguz, it also has tatars, Krgyz, Nogays, Avsar, kazaks, cuman, uzbek and Turkmen, wow dude ur cover is seriously blown now.

  • Comment removed

  • kardes simdi sen kipcaklar gercek turk olmadiginimi soyluyorsun yokse ben mi yanlis anliyorum?

  • Baybarsın kıpçak türkü olduğunu söylüyorum.Kıpçaklar öz be öz Türktür.

  • Comment removed

  • Baybars KIPCHAK

  • yes he was Kipchak!

  • Cute little boy. What movie was this from??? Also, what was the movie about???

    It's kinda hard to speculate given only ~6:00 minutes.

  • Mongols are awesome. Obviously, even if the army was made up of Turks, they were under the brain power of a Mongol ruler. So they would all be Mongols by that lone fact.

  • Look At History

    Göktürk Empire!

    Mongols were called as

    Otuz Tatar and 9 Oguz !

    Mongols ancestors are the same like Turks!

  • We are not mongol

    Mongol are Turks!

  • mongols are not turks, turks are mongols.

  • turks are uygurs[oguz and ogur tribe]. mongols are nothing. mongols created by ghangis han and he called mongol for his own people. and ghangis used turkic horse riders in his army,couse of that he created big army. idiot. we turks exist since khuns,but europe accepted existing of turks since gokturk khante a.c. 600 but when exist mongols? a.c. 1200 by ghangis khan :D so do you still think turks are from mongols ? :D:D:D

  • yes because many mongols raped the turks not the other way aroud. anyways- yes you are correct, turks became a huge part of the mongol army and most of the original mongolian element took a backseat to turkic majority.

  • not rape, because so many turkic soldier took mongolian women like they took chinese too. it was rule of wars at those times.if i killed you at war , i have choice to take your woman...

  • mongol men took turkic women and turkic men took mongol women (the second was alot less frequent because there were more turks than mongols)

  • couse of that turkic people have 300 mil. population but mongols have 10 mil population arround of the world? hahahaha

    my friend turkic people have so many faces but we have one soul :D dont worry about us. we are turkic not mongolid or iranic or arabic :D

  • i think you are having an identity crisis.

  • agree with you from kyrgyzstan

    our genotype is same,our soul is same, we will come back

  • @balkanturkic Turks and Mongols have the same origin but are not the exactly the same, Turks were the basis of the messians and Mongols the basis for the orientals, however Mongols are a far older race of people they can be traced back well over 26,000 years of existence, the native Americans are Mongol descendent's. The problems here is your nationalism its so overwhelming it interferes with your facts. From the Mongols also came the Timurids and Mughals.

  • This identifying with bloodlines is very dodgy, specially within the Turkic identity. We can safely say that the Turks originally came from northern-Mongolia, and like the Tuvans, Yakuts and other smaller Siberian Turks it's safe to say they are Mongolian in appearance. When they moved into present day central Asia they encoutered a Caucasian people (check out the Urumqi mummies) it's the mixing with these that has caused the blue eyes and even occasional blond hair among the central Asian Turks

  • When the Seljuks ruled Persia they as good diplomats intermarried with the daughters of the local rulers. By the time they moved into Byzantium they were allready more Persian in blood than Turco-Mongol. However present day Ottoman Turks are descendants of Armenians and Greeks and have very little up to nothing to do with the original Turco-Mongols. A comparison between Ottoman Turks with Armenians and Greeks on the one hand and Tuvans, Yakuts on the other will clearly proof this!

  • This obsession with Turkishness that only Ottoman Turks seem to suffer from (Kazakhs, Tuvans etc want nothing off it!) is a typical search for an superior identity to cover up the uncertainty of who they are. You saw the same in Nazi-Germany were the fanatic Nazi's all came from Bavaria and Austria (infact descendants from Celts, Romans and even Slavs) whilest the pure Nordic Germans from n-Germany were the least enthusiastic. The most pan-Arabic are the Sudanese who are more black than Arab!

  • that is an intersting theory, and a very good one to develop further on, do you mind proving that northern germans were less enthusiastic about the nazi cause?

  • @buthabuthe You mean Kemalist Turks not Ottoman Turks, Kemalist Turks are the ones that believe in the bogus racist blabber of Mustafa Kemal not Ottoman Turks. Mustafa Kemal's oh so free and wonderful secular state of military rule is the one that made the "law of turkishness" the Ottomans never cared for race or they wouldn't have mixed so much with the surrounding people.

  • Dude seriously, learn some history and then talk,they mixed when they got to anatolia. O.k now u r just bullshitting.

  • MEMLÜKLER 2 BİLİNEN IRKTIR 1-TÜRK 2-ÇERKES İLK BAŞLARDA TÜRKLER HÜKÜM SÜRERKEN SONRADAN ÇERKESLER GEÇTİ. YALNIZ YİNE KONUŞULAN DİL TÜRKÇEYDİ MEMLÜK DEVLETİNİ TABİKİ ÇERKES - TÜRK DİYE AYIRT EDEMEYİZ... BU DEVLET YANİ BENİM DEVLETİM ORADA İSLAM SANCAĞINI TAŞIDI MONGOL BELASINI DURDURDU.... YAŞASIN SULTANIMIZ BAYBAYRAS HAN... ( Deli Kıpçak )

    ( Kölemen Beyi )

  • Got to Mno3at channel on youtube, he has the series about Baybars, so far he uploaded the first 27 episodes. Its in Arabic though.

  • I read Moris Simashko's Emshan, but didn't watch a film

    Thanks for uploading and sharing

  • Baybars means the "rich tiger" :D in turkish, so stop arguing about his origin.. :). the Dynasty of Mamelouks is a turkish dynasty... YEAH WE ARE INCREDIBLE WE POPED OUT EVERY WHERE, PEKIN ? RUSSIA? TURKEY? EUROPA? INDIA? IRAN? MIDDLE EAST....etc....

  • not turkish, TURKIC. and after the turks circassian mameluks take over

  • yeah yeah, its the same thing for me because at their time , all turkic people were speaking exactly the same language with very little difference, the difference was not big as today.

  • yeah from 1250 to 1382, the bahrits (turks) were in power, and from 1382 to 1516 , there were the burdjits (circassian), but during the reign of burdjits, the bahrits took the power again from 1422 to 1495. And at 1517 Egypt was taken by the Ottoman, Selim 1st. Egypt was a turkish country (or more exactly "under the reign of turks for 800 year).

  • Where Turks lived before, They are from Kazakhstan like other Turkish speaking groups. So is Bebrais He is from Kazakhstan. YOu can not agrue with History. If you happen to go to Egypt, you can see his castle designed by Kazakh ornaments.

  • but he is not kazakh. he was kypchak, and he had blue eyes...

  • My mother is Kipchak and some Kazakhs do have blue eyes. Kipchak is one Kazakh tribes. All the tribes in Kazakhstan created the country called Kazakhstan

  • Beybars was a Muslim Leader "Sultan"

    That's all

    and he fought for Allah and for Islam

    He was the Sultan of Egypt, Syria Iraq, Mecca and Madina

    The only relation between him and the Turks was in 1268 when he Defeated the Saljuk turks after thier Sultan Trated Muslims and Joined the Monogols

    In one Battle northen Iraq he defeated a great army compined from three forces "Monogols, Crusaders, and the Turkish Saljuks Sultan's army".

  • tttarek i'm shoked dude

    Beybars is a f***** Turkish name and he absolutely was a Turk not an Arab.

  • did he wrote that he was arab? no-

  • GREAT TURKİSH ALLİANCE UNİTED

  • Mamluk - turk kanli eski halik!!

    Kazak halkimizga en jakin!!

  • he is a thaher baybers rkn dine albanda9dari

  • SULTAN-BAYBARS türk hükümdarıdır lan [C*]

  • TURKEY WANTS TURKISH FEDERATION.

  • YES!!!Beybars is from turkic tribe. He is Kipchak(Mamluk). Firstly read some books before making this kinda comments.

  • yawa Bey Bars Turk heheheheh

    i think he is Kush'xa , maybe Balker from turk or I am sure he is Korshay heheheheheh they live in kavkaz and they speak turkish

    loool

  • Since all the comments are in English, I'll stick to it too.

    Great film! Great landscapes, acting, music! A+!! I feel so much respect of history of the East and hate stereotypes that say that Asia is a savage place. I'd like you all to know that there are Russians who really resprect your culture and history!! And this great film is a perfect contribution to it.

    By the way, do you know where to download the music which resembles the one being played in the film?

  • Since all the comments are in English, I'll stick to it too.

    Great film! Great landscapes, acting, music! A+!! I feel so much respect of history of the East and hate stereotypes that say that Asia is a savage place. I'd like you all to know that there are Russians who really resprect your culture and history!! And this great film is a perfect contribution to it.

    By the way, do you know where to download the music which resembles the one being played in the film?

  • It's so sad that egypt which saw baybars rising as a captain then marshal then sultan and we don't have arabic subtitles.

  • لا اله ال الله محمد رسول الله

  • Who is the blond haired guy hanging out with the Central Asian nomads?

  • He is a byzantian merchant who buys the orphan boy found on the battlefield, near him his lady. They like the boy so much, that buy him, from Khan of Zhuchi's Ulus, the children of determined tribes were forbidden to sell abroad, but he overrides this obstacle by giving the Khan luxury presents.

  • It is not a documentary, so no ones tries to commit anybody in truthness of this story, but among stories about Sultan Baibars you won't find any that wouldn't confront another. So one of the versions of his life is depictured in this film made by Kazakfilm.

  • It means "the King Panther"

  • baybars an turks

  • what does baybars mean in kipchak?

  • It means something like "Mister Snow Leopard"

  • i think its just something they made up! baybars is a word that cna be directly translated in circassian language! anyways they say he had blue eyes! i doubt he's kypchak!

  • U mean in Kazakh cuz it's Kazakh word, Baris - leopard, Bi - like high, wise,

  • neskajiteli gde mogu nayti eto film

  • U menia bila video kasseta v VHS. Esli do sih por ne nashe'l nichego luchshe, mogu poiskat' i vislat' kopiyu.

  • thanks good job ! good clip!

  • Vstkohudye netvorni chtohoi negarnuhoriyet

  • chestno govora rapidshare glupai shtuka  babki inogda prosit i registracii, legshe vsego perekinut cherez msm, esli svaz horoshay to mojno zakinut.

  • vse jdu s neterpeniem eoto shedevr kazakhskogo kinematografa.

  • skoro skoro,prosto sessii na nosu i eshe s rapidoy nado razobratsya. ya etot film sam priobryol v ne polnoy versii, film koloritnyj da, no v nyom otsutstvuet koncovka, dumayu naibolee trogatelnaya chast, kstati imenno koncovka ceplyaet za jivoe gde Beybars yakoby pokidaya tron v strane Misr, uhodit pod vidom prostogo starca v rodnye kypchakskie stepi...

  • u mena v planah vstavit angliiskii titry,

    5 minut dla inostransev - zato pust znaut shto nasha istorya namnogo ranshe bila chem evropieskaya.

    Mi kochevniki narod dostoinii, sprevedlivi i s kosmopolitichnim mirovosreniem.

  • Debashir, kop rahmet

  • super film. Mojet zakinesh na rapidshare?

  • Kak zakinu, srazu soobshu...

  • ...A ya odinok,za stolom kypchakov jivie potomki, zabyli o slavnom bylom. No russkaya muza gotova, sklonyayas' na pyl'niy granit. Prochest' polovetskoe slovo, na jarkoy grudi piramid...

  • o rahmet sagan debashir!