Added: 3 years ago
From: abc4fun
Views: 8,427
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its obvius amd ownz

  • damn, i hav a e6550 and p45, should i go amd?

  • @madzane94

    @madzane94

    go amd and buy ASROCK EXTREME 3 MOBO(USB 3.0./SATA 3.0./ESATA 3.0)

    buy an PHENOM X6 and overclock it to 4.0ghz, buy an ATI card and overclock it, buy fast DDR3 memory, then overclock the integrated HD4290 card by 50%, the 128MB sideport memory from 667 to 1333MHz(another 50%) then turn on HYBRID CROSSFIRE: and this integrated overclocked card will add u power to your discrete card. And u have extreme gaming/multimedia PC for a buck...

  • @madzane94 Yes!

  • I am sure ,,,AMD is the best

  • is 790gx alot or a little better then the

    780g and is it worth the extra 50$

  • @acethebunny you saying that A790GHM and Phenom II X2 550 [3.1GHz] and 4 gigs of ram I could play gta 4 with around 20-30 fps

    if you have enough free time to give me a better config for around 400$ I would appreciate it very much (cuz Imma newbie in computing:)

  • I have a AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @ 2.6ghz, with Windows Vista and a NVidia MCP61 chipset (with GF8500GT) chipset.

    it runs absolutely mint I even get a rating of 5.0 for Aero and 5.3 for gaming in 3D

    so I dont have to upgrade soon. I can play Crysis at High without lag

  • I love my AMD 790GX north bridge with ATI SB750 south bridge.

    the only thing holding me back is a Athlon X2 5800+ :| need to get a phenom

  • yep and what grpahic card u have? coz if u have the 4870 or 4890 but D phenom one u will have an AMD dragon system :P

  • i go with the amd chipset because intel integrated graphics suck on intel.

  • im telling you guys dont buy intel chipsets

    i play COD4 and so fucking lag i know its not video card its my procesor keeping me laaaaaaaaag

  • amd rules

  • its kinda stupid how he compares the way the graphics look on the Intel machine at 4:45 when he alludes away from saying he lowered the graphics. He could just turn the graphics up to look the same as the AMD machine to compare the performance which would be a much better way to do it instead of having the AMD machine with full graphics and the Intel machine with the lowest settings. Who knows maybe it would play smoothly enough on the Intel machine to actually play and he doesn't want that.

  • Corporate bashing, I just love it.

  • u know ive always liked AMD..i play Call of Duty 4 with an AMD Athlon 64 +3000 1.8GHz processor, and it runs faster than the Intel core 2 duo 2.2GHz that we have, im quite impressed and am recommending AMD for all my friends who want fast computers...and for the people who are complaining about the 3 core thing, would you rather he use the AMD Athlon 64x2 2.7GHz?

  • it's true that AMD put on it's side a triple-core processor and left intel win only a dual-core processor,but,look at the prices...even with 3 cores AMD is cheaper (remember 650 vs 670US$), and if u see another video about the G780,in wich,i think they're using the seme core number, you'll see the same result.Besides, some AMD dual-cores got,in games,the performance of some 4CORES processors,beacause games do not take much advantage of more than 3 cores,beacause the games are designed 4 2cores.

  • Anyways I got an AMD Athlon 64X2 Dual Core +6000 3.0 GHZ. Pretty good for gaming, but with an ATI Radeon 1250X, its pretty useless for Call of Duty World at War.... Since I got myself a new video card (Nvidia Geforce 9800 GT), the frame-rate just got higher then ever.... It feels like I am in war right now.

  • not fair

    compare it to a AMD 2 cores

  • The tri-core is AMD's closest processor in price to the Intel Core 2. It makes sense :)

    Plus, the extra core isn't really being used in this task - games rely more on the graphics processor :)

  • tahur45!! i wud lik to tell u somthin fuck ur mom amd z da best see da price mother fucker

    650$vs675$!!

  • You are an idiot and need a translator. He said, "AMD 780G kicking ass", which is what you are trying to correct him with. If you didn't get that, then he is saying that AMD ROX. : P

    I am pretty much debating on them challenging a 2 core chipset of Intel vs 3 core of AMD, just compare 2 quads, since it seems like 3 cores are ganging up on 2, making it obvious that 3 will render a higher frame rate.

  • He dont understand "Parear pompis"... "Patear" is "kick" and "pompis" is different way to say "culo", or in english "ass"

  • I'm Thinkin Your Screen Recorder Sucks Like Your Butt Cheese.

  • AMD 780G pateando pompis!

  • Si mero, vato. Que se incline Intel para darles la patas.

  • This is not about the CPU only.

    It's a comparison between existing typical "mainstream", "office" PC platforms with integrated graphics. AMDs 780G and Intels G35. Intel's integrated solutions have always been the worst existing on the market. I pity their customers.

    Still, a gamer shouldn't buy an integrated platform anyway. You can do a very cheap gaming PC with a AMD 770 mb, X2 4800+ CPU and a HD3850. It will vastly outperform this 780G/Phenom and any comparably priced Intel solutions.

  • How about comparing the processors with the same amount of cores! Not being fair AMD!

  • they're comparing it on the same price point. they're saying, on that same price point, you can get better (triple core on amd, and 2 core on intel)

  • yea this is completely fair due to shity intel overpricing there (GREAT) gaming cpu's

    intel fials for gaming

    amd has been the gaming cpu and will be!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more