Added: 2 years ago
From: tingtangs
Views: 120
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There's a pretty good reason why they use the same argument. Neither claims have been scientifically proven.

  • post glacial rebound from nuclear fallout

    look it up ppl

    it's not greenhouse gases.

  • @freakoutguitarsolo1 There's nothing to look up. It's a religious fundamentalist conspiracy theory based on lies and misinformation, whereas climate science is based on observable facts.

  • You draw no conclusions but what you think may be happening. You match it up with something that has nothing to do with it. Your a propagandist with no facts to support your claims save those you cherry picked. Nice try

  • @jsh78mang Guess what, assmuncher, the tobaccoists were using the exact same tactics the denialists are using today. Distortion, lies, pretending that there is another side that is being oppressed... Even the same people are involved!

    The propaganda here is in the video. The liar using an argument that the current liars are using - "there is another side to this."

  • Good find!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more