@SlayerPDX -yeh- a $195 "mitigated" fine for not wearing my seatbelt twice seems a bit exorbitant... sounds backwards, but yeh, it makes me want to wear it less. Call it civil disobedience. The argument I usually get from people trying to justify the law is that MY not wearing a seatbelt makes THEIR insurance premium rise. (Insurance: something else which should also be strictly voluntary.)
Subtract my fines from the Socialist Security Insurance payments I'll never see, right?
The first time I saw this, I wanted to shoot an arrow between the beep beep guy's eyes... You ain't the roadrunner, dude.
Now, we keep seeing this ad during every single commercial break in the Tigers' games. What a great way to spend the non-existent state funds...
Still waiting on the cops for an explanation as to HOW they can actually tell if people are wearing their seat belts. Especially if the people are moving, at night. The whole exercise does seem rather suspicious.
@hydra513 Yeh you can be sure that "seatbelt checks" are a justification to pull people over to try and catch them doing something else... I guess they call that probable cause.
In any case, I found out that if you contest a seatbelt violation (at least in WA state), the "preponderance of evidence" stands behind the cop. That is, just like much else these days, you are guilty unless you can prove yourself innocent. Your word is of lesser value than a cop's, even when he has no other evidence.
Yeah... seat belt use should be an individual choice, not compulsory. If the threat of death or mutilation isn't enough to make someone wear one, then how could a fine be a sufficient deterrent? Stop wasting my money. Stop pulling people over for something concerning personal safety-- the police SHOULD be dealing with much LARGER problems, not harassing private citizens.
Not to mention-- if the goal is truly to keep the public safe, then where are the safety belts on city buses? I've never seen one. What about on motorcycles? Actually, motorcycles and ATVs are notorious for contributing to injury/death motor vehicle accidents... is the next step to outlaw them, or fine people for riding? Let's use our own brains to reach logical conclusions, now.
@bnomad77 What bugs me even more is that it shouldn't even be a law the only thing you would be hurting would be yourself and no one else for not wearing a seatbelt. Its just as bad as the friend of the court taking money from a CS check and then holding it for six months to collect interest instead of them giving it to the family that fuckin needs it.
@igorvasy NO its YOUR own job to protect yourself. Wearing a seatbelt has no affect on anyone but yourself so it is a pointless law and cops should be worring about other shit.
Who DOESN'T wear a seatbelt? You people are all psychotics, no one has any respect for driving laws or other drivers. There is no way in hell I'd travel a single yard on a public road with you fools about without some kind of safety harness.
If someone doesn't want to wear a seatbelt, I say let Darwinism do its work. This is a waste of tax payer money. Everyone knows it is the law, and ignorance of the law is not an excuse anyway. Keep quiet about it, write more tickets.
@SlayerPDX I suggest that it is you who has missed the point, since your scattered and misspelled opinions here seem to express a similar opinion to my own - the state ought to leave seat belts as a matter of personal choice rather than law. Stop protecting us from ourselves. I wear a seat belt because I don't want to die. If someone else doesn't make that same choice, too bad for them.
As your comment above states: stop wasting money on commercials. That was my point - who's dumb?
Michigan is a totalitarian state, stealing from "the people" $65 at a time. It is each individuals right to decide whether to wear a seat belt or not. Why not take people's money for not wearing steel toe boots, knee pads, a helmet and a bullet proof vest? We don't need a nanny state.
LAST I KNEW WEARING OR NO WEARING A SEAT BELT ONLY EFFECTS THE DRIVER? SO IF SOMEONE ACTUALLY WANTS TO WEAR A SEATBELT THATS FINE! BUT IF SOMEONE DOESNT WANT TO WEAR ONE THEY SHOULDNT HAVE TO! Now if someone is driving crazy and going in and out of lane then they should be pulled over cause they r a danger to others.
@shawndeweerd Hes not talkin about the fact he has to wear a seatbelt you dumb fuck he's talking about how michigan is in such a bad economic state with budget issues and we get a commerical that probably cost 90,000 to make telling us something we already know... Jerk
I hate your stupid ass seatbelt adds shut the fuck up it makes me want to wear it even less.
SlayerPDX 1 year ago
@SlayerPDX -yeh- a $195 "mitigated" fine for not wearing my seatbelt twice seems a bit exorbitant... sounds backwards, but yeh, it makes me want to wear it less. Call it civil disobedience. The argument I usually get from people trying to justify the law is that MY not wearing a seatbelt makes THEIR insurance premium rise. (Insurance: something else which should also be strictly voluntary.)
Subtract my fines from the Socialist Security Insurance payments I'll never see, right?
bnomad77 1 year ago
I hate this SOOOO much!
MrWatt619 1 year ago
As soon as he takes your dollar, knock him down and say
"YOU DON'T JUST WALK UP IN THIS HUMPY BUMPY ANNOY THE HELL OUTTA THE EMPLOYEES AND STEAL THEIR CASH!!!"
and then walk away.
evilmajikman 1 year ago
i know the beeper person he is my circus camp director rick
MAGIC4UNME 1 year ago
Beardy dude is damned sexy.
Matrix29bear 1 year ago
The first time I saw this, I wanted to shoot an arrow between the beep beep guy's eyes... You ain't the roadrunner, dude.
Now, we keep seeing this ad during every single commercial break in the Tigers' games. What a great way to spend the non-existent state funds...
Still waiting on the cops for an explanation as to HOW they can actually tell if people are wearing their seat belts. Especially if the people are moving, at night. The whole exercise does seem rather suspicious.
hydra513 1 year ago
@hydra513 Yeh you can be sure that "seatbelt checks" are a justification to pull people over to try and catch them doing something else... I guess they call that probable cause.
In any case, I found out that if you contest a seatbelt violation (at least in WA state), the "preponderance of evidence" stands behind the cop. That is, just like much else these days, you are guilty unless you can prove yourself innocent. Your word is of lesser value than a cop's, even when he has no other evidence.
bnomad77 1 year ago
Seat belts are for wusses.
xclonedx 1 year ago
Lol i would punch this guy in the face
g0ing2n0where 1 year ago 2
Yeah... seat belt use should be an individual choice, not compulsory. If the threat of death or mutilation isn't enough to make someone wear one, then how could a fine be a sufficient deterrent? Stop wasting my money. Stop pulling people over for something concerning personal safety-- the police SHOULD be dealing with much LARGER problems, not harassing private citizens.
bnomad77 1 year ago
Not to mention-- if the goal is truly to keep the public safe, then where are the safety belts on city buses? I've never seen one. What about on motorcycles? Actually, motorcycles and ATVs are notorious for contributing to injury/death motor vehicle accidents... is the next step to outlaw them, or fine people for riding? Let's use our own brains to reach logical conclusions, now.
bnomad77 1 year ago
@bnomad77 What bugs me even more is that it shouldn't even be a law the only thing you would be hurting would be yourself and no one else for not wearing a seatbelt. Its just as bad as the friend of the court taking money from a CS check and then holding it for six months to collect interest instead of them giving it to the family that fuckin needs it.
SlayerPDX 1 year ago
@SlayerPDX ay poopface, the state's job is to protect us, you poopface.
igorvasy 1 year ago
@igorvasy NO its YOUR own job to protect yourself. Wearing a seatbelt has no affect on anyone but yourself so it is a pointless law and cops should be worring about other shit.
SlayerPDX 1 year ago
Who DOESN'T wear a seatbelt? You people are all psychotics, no one has any respect for driving laws or other drivers. There is no way in hell I'd travel a single yard on a public road with you fools about without some kind of safety harness.
If someone doesn't want to wear a seatbelt, I say let Darwinism do its work. This is a waste of tax payer money. Everyone knows it is the law, and ignorance of the law is not an excuse anyway. Keep quiet about it, write more tickets.
dhsn28 1 year ago
@dhsn28 Wow your dumb and completely missing the point.
SlayerPDX 1 year ago
@SlayerPDX I suggest that it is you who has missed the point, since your scattered and misspelled opinions here seem to express a similar opinion to my own - the state ought to leave seat belts as a matter of personal choice rather than law. Stop protecting us from ourselves. I wear a seat belt because I don't want to die. If someone else doesn't make that same choice, too bad for them.
As your comment above states: stop wasting money on commercials. That was my point - who's dumb?
dhsn28 1 year ago
We love the beep beep man!
LeathermanArts 1 year ago
Michigan is a totalitarian state, stealing from "the people" $65 at a time. It is each individuals right to decide whether to wear a seat belt or not. Why not take people's money for not wearing steel toe boots, knee pads, a helmet and a bullet proof vest? We don't need a nanny state.
YoDudeRock 2 years ago
Q: Which one is Dave Fletcher -- the driver or the beeper?
Gonzilla3 2 years ago
FLETCHER!!!!
unruliacres 2 years ago
Shit I just did a text comment. I don't know what that is all about. OOPS. Anyway. David Fletcher Rocks.
If you haven't yet go check out REASONABLE DOUBTS PODCAST.
Go...Listen... Think - GOD
gotjones1 2 years ago
I love reasonable doubts!!! This is such a great campaign.
REASONABLE DOUBTS PODCAST
Go...Listen.....Think.... - GOD
gotjones1 2 years ago
Annoying, yes, but there's one easy way to shut him up!
GrandRiverDog 2 years ago
I also have reasonable doubts about this campaign.
forrul 2 years ago
Search "Happy Rob Buy" by google ,and you will find amazing.
Mrann1990 2 years ago
I have reasonable doubts about this campaign.
UnBeguiled 2 years ago
i've seen this commercial at least 30 times in the past hour...
D:
shippohugger 2 years ago
Nice to know we are in a budget crisis and having crap like this on you tube. I am writing my federal congressman.
mattinmichigan 2 years ago
This is not crap. This is a commercial that gets its point across.
Go ahead and write your congressman. He will tell you to STFU and wear your seatbelt.
shawndeweerd 2 years ago
LAST I KNEW WEARING OR NO WEARING A SEAT BELT ONLY EFFECTS THE DRIVER? SO IF SOMEONE ACTUALLY WANTS TO WEAR A SEATBELT THATS FINE! BUT IF SOMEONE DOESNT WANT TO WEAR ONE THEY SHOULDNT HAVE TO! Now if someone is driving crazy and going in and out of lane then they should be pulled over cause they r a danger to others.
silly1one 1 year ago
@shawndeweerd Hes not talkin about the fact he has to wear a seatbelt you dumb fuck he's talking about how michigan is in such a bad economic state with budget issues and we get a commerical that probably cost 90,000 to make telling us something we already know... Jerk
SlayerPDX 1 year ago
beep beep beep beep beep beep
WorkaholixCollective 2 years ago
i know him!
nickyz607 2 years ago