Cenk has never been right about anything. This was the same guy who really believed Anthony Weiner was telling the truth. I wouldn't listen to Cenk for advice on buying used cars, let alone important political matters.
Stupid argument on the tax rates. Now-a-days the alternative minimum tax, phase out of itemized deductions, limits on mortgage interest deductions, phase out of exemptions and rental losses, increased limits on Soc Sec taxes....blah blah blah, makes the current marginal rates effectively higher today than the rates at the time of Reagan if you do the math....opps liberals can't add...ok.
People don't be duped by this bullshit.
This portrayal is stupidity.Hell Kennedy put out a hit Castro.
@onecoolcaldude Liberals cant do math, but tax cuts pay for themselves? Group think is a terrible thing especially when you have had tow administrations to prove it is wrong. Funny thing is the lowest state when it comes to math are Mississippi and Alabama both are very conservative states
This new conservative movement is nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to Obama. The right portrays him as a communist murder machine and rednecks believe it. I really do think that race plays a much bigger role in this than anyone wants to admit. Thats the bad thing about modern racism. It isn't public anymore, so people can just pretend its not there.
The nation has moved to the right, people are more pessimistic about change and the future and are much more afraid of it.. With good reason, we've gotten in 3 wars in the last 20 years, borrowed 3+ Trillion to fund them and the world is if anything more unstable.. Now the rich are telling the poor they have to belt tighten while they live it up? The absolute hypocrisy and social divide will tear this country apart..
I think another president who is way more liberal and certainly wouldn't be considered conservative today is Nixon. Passing the Clean Air Act and EPA, he would be neutered by Mox news. Mox news is fucking crazy!!! FCC get these bitches off!!!!!!
@halifaxx55 Nixon was also a "dove". He got out of Vietnam, began a period of "detente" with the Soviet Union (which improved global security), brought China in from the cold, and promoted peace and stability in the Middle East by bringing Egypt into the USA's sphere of influence.
@jimmyrtle well that's a different point than your previous, which was the logically twisted statement that he's not conservative because he wants to set them at 39% rather than 50%.
"he's not conservative because he wants to set them at 39% rather than 50%"
No, my point is that Cenk said Reagan was liberal because he wanted tax rates to be 50% (down from 70%) while Obama wants rates to rise to 39.6% (up from 35%).
Maybe Cenk is too stupid to see the difference between raising and lowering rates? He's already too stupid to see the difference between liberal and conservative.
Correction, he's a YouTube sponsored, "egocentric ... fraud".
The entire front page of YouTube's politics section has been 100% "Turk" 100% of the time, daily, for weeks up to this election. Whereas, everywhere else, even the most popular channels are lucky to get one or two of their videos at the top of their section on any given day.
They did this during the 2008 election cycle too. See the video: "The Politics of Planting".
YouTube is one of Google's political fraud engines.
@TylerNull I can't disagree; I've long noticed the spamming and "front-paging" of TYT on YouTube. Manipulation is at hand everywhere. Since the media and schooling have done such a good job planting leftist propaganda in the minds of those my age they are unable to accept, or even realize, the fact that they are continuously being force fed one side of any given issue. This anti-intellectual wave has benefited Democrats and leftist ideology, so even though I argue factually I rarely make a dent
... if the voters of Nevada don't elect her into office, instead of Senator (& Senate Majority Leader) HARRY REID, she recommends 2cnd AMENDMENT REMEDIES as a cure for the HARRY REID problems !! " If someone heeds her advice, and offers a 'REMEDY' by "TAKING OUT" Senator Reid, will Mrs. Angle be held accountable ? I doubt it. History has proven that HATEFUL rhetoric can have VIOLENT yet somewhat predictable consequences. Wake Up. Don't be intimidated by HATRED & EXTREMISM
Of the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of YouTube channels, you actually believe that only ONE fringe Leftist is voted to the top to shut out ALL others -- EVERY VIDEO of the ENTIRE front page of YouTube's Politics section?
EVERY day.
Day after day.
Week after week.
And these are the guys from Air America Media who go bankrupt anywhere & everywhere they've tried to compete -- "dominate" is an odd term for a fraud engine.
You're claim doesn't pass the common sense test. 100% Leftist Turk 100% of the time is evidence of competition being snuffed out, as socialists do whenever and wherever they can get away with it.
EVERY video on the entire front page?
EVERY day?
Day after day?
Week after week?
Never before has anything like that occurred, even for one day. And it's not a brain teaser to figure out something is rotten. Then again, if your political kind never does allow reality to seep in.
@DiverseLA Conservative? Name one brain cell in your mind that still functions. ALL VIDEOS on the page are ALL of this ONE Leftist Turk. There are NO OTHER CHANNELS. NONE. No other Liberal channels. No moderate channels. No sane channels. N-O-N-E Do you guys genuinely as brain-dead as your posts appear, or do you fake your idiocies because you are keenly aware of the fraud machines powering your fascist party and know you can't defend them? Either way, Dem'rats are a toxic farce.
@TylerNull So you couldn't name one Conservative show on YouTube?
Why are you so angry? Shut the fuck up and stop complaining, sissy. Whining that TYT is popular. Instead of complaining about their success and claiming there's some kind of conspiracy, start your own Conservative YouTube show.
I thought you Cons were about the Free Market? And the Free Market decided TYT is the top dog. So quit your bitchin'.
@TylerNull Your argument is that YouTube is perhaps in on some conspiracy to keep TYT at the top.
Yet TYT is at the top because people keep voting them at the top. They have a large following, greater than any Conservative political show on YouTube.
@DiverseLA FOCUS: 100% fringe Turk. 100% of the time. 100% of the days. 100% of the weeks. That's not merely "at the top" That's NOT any evidence of any "voting". That is an indisputable, signature trait of fraud. That's an observation, not an argument. That's a cold hard fact, not an opinion. Snap out of your dementia.
Perhaps your idiocies are genuine, but I'm quite happy to have mindless dolts like you help me chronicle the mental dysfunctions of Dem'rat devotees.
And I will continue to bitch-slap you with reality as long as you keep helping me. (It's my hobby.)
Any time and everywhere Americans have a CHOICE, they reject the gibberish of fringe Leftists like the Turk. And yet ignoramuses like you believe their 100% shutout here is some kind of honest competition.
@TylerNull How am I projecting? That would mean I'm whining about TYT being at the top? I'm glad they're at the top and they deserve it.
You're whining.
You're whining.
You're whining.
I asked you several times already to name which Conservative political show should be above TYT, and you've failed to answer each time. If there's a notable competitor, name them! You whining, moaning, sissified coward.
As for your other repeated question, why do you keep ignoring my answer?
100% of the videos being of ONE source, as they are in YouTube's Politics -- and only in YouTube's Politics -- is irrefutable proof there is ZERO competition allowed. Stunningly, your dim bulb keeps pointing to my evidence as if it bolsters your denials of it.
@TylerNull You have the intellectual fortitude of a slab of dried concrete.
It was not an answer to the question.
Again: Name one Conservative political show on YouTube that has as large of a following (subscribers) as TYT? Name one. Name one. Name one.
You failed to answer, as in name that show. You just whine about TYT being voted to the top. I'm not sure why you're whining to me as if I'm going to change it.
@TylerNull You still haven't named which show you think should be beating TYT. You're just whining and whining some more. If you can't name the show, then why complain that TYT is voted the best?
You're like a person that's whining that Kobe Bryant is beating high school kids in basketball but can't name who should be beating him. If there is no competition, he will win every time!
Here's a prediction - in your next response, you won't be able to name which show should be voted at the top.
"You still haven't" allowed reality to seep in. Instead, you whine that I bitch-slapped you with it.
(That's an observation, not a "prediction".)
"TYT is voted..." -- wrong. There is ZERO voting going on. If there were voting, then there would be more than one channel, as there are everywhere else and with much more popular channels.
Perhaps your idiocies are genuine, but we typically find your political kind are willfully self deceptive, as your posts help me to demonstrate.
Your argument fails again. Not once did I say TYT wasn't at the top of the Politics section most of the time. In fact, I said it is because of it's popularity.
What you're arguing is that there's a conspiracy by YouTube to keep TYT at the top. It's at the top because of its subscriber base, views, votes, and favorites. You failed to show which Political show should be beating TYT. You only whine & whine some more.
And, you're projecting. You haven't said what I'm whining about.
You keep insisting that reality is someone's conspiracy theory.
It's not.
ALL the videos on the front page of YouYube's Politics section are ALL "Turk" ALL the time.
That's not an "argument".
Now, everywhere and always elsewhere there are, at most, one or two videos from the most popular YouTube channels at any one time.
Either you are truly too stupid to grasp that realization, or you pose as such with your silly apologetics because your politics can't let reality seep in.
@TylerNull You're the only person I've seen whine about this. You're the only one I've seen that cares this much. You're crying, pouting, whining, bitching, and moaning.
How about you BE A MAN and DO SOMETHING about it, since this upsets you so much? All you do is whine, whine, whine about TYT being at the top. You have to be the biggest sissy I've ever encountered.
How come you're unable to name another political show on YouTube that can compete with TYT? You faggot.
Once again, princess, the "Turk" is not "at the top".
The "Turk" is the ONLY CHANNEL on the front page, 100% of the time. 100% of the days. The "Turk" is at the top, the bottom, the left, the right, the middle and sideways. Therefore, the "Turk" is YouTube's political fraud engine.
"You're the only person I've seen whine" that someone noticed it.
@TylerNull Whining isn't doing shit but whining. You're not doing anything. Why not file a lawsuit or have an investigation of corruption against YouTube?
You're projecting again, cupcake. The head of the Birthers is Philip J. Berg, a Democrat party activist, lawyer, and also a Truther. Much like the Warmers, all of America's morons are Dem'rat powered.
Now, calm down and realize that you admitted to my point of YouTube's political fraud engine, only after a week of whining that I posted it.
@TylerNull Incorrect. The head of the birther movement is Conservative Orly Taitz. Also known as the "Birther Queen".
Pointing out that TYT is at the top of the politics section does not prove anything. You have to cite some actual evidence of wrongdoing. And you also have to cite a competitive politics station that can compete with TYT. You failed to do both, because you are a coward. You're simply whining about TYT being at the top. Nothing more.
Your denials don't change the facts. And it's a bit late to back peddle since you admitted to them, though you did so only to whine that I posted them.
And aside from proving you don't know the meaning of the word "evidence", you' now spread your idiocy to other areas. Your Dem'rat activist is the one who filed the lawsuit challenging the legality of your secular messiah to run for president. He's the leader of the Birther movement.
@TylerNull Admitted to what? All I admitted was that The Young Turks is consistently at the top due to its views, ratings, and subscribers. You're claiming there's a conspiracy. You're a bitch and a whiner.
"100%! Wahhhh!"
"100%! Wahhhh!"
"100%! Wahhhh!"
"100%! Wahhhh!"
And it isn't "100%" - that would mean no other videos ever make it on the front. Which is a lie. But TYT is up there a lot and that's because the people want it to be there. Get over it, whiner.
@TylerNull I'm asking you to provide evidence that YouTube is guilty of committing some kind of corruption of purposely keeping TYT at the top. You still haven't shown any proof.
You couldn't name another political channel that should be beating TYT. It's a good thing you didn't become a lawyer, because you completely suck and providing any evidence to back up your arguments.
TYT is NOT "at the top". If they were "at the top", then they would have a video or two, most days, "at the top". Not 23 of all 23, every day, every week, as they have.
I'm NOT asking you to allow reality to seep in. I'm merely chronicling your rejection of it. It's nothing personal, I just like bitch slapping your political kind with reality, and having you record the manner by which you reject it.
@TylerNull What video evidence? What video link have you posted?
Provide evidence that YouTube is corruptly causing TYT to remain at the top of the Politics section. You still continue to fail at providing evidence.
You still continue to fail to name a competitive Political show on YouTube that competes with TYT. You continue to fail. You know why? Because you have no answer. You know you can't answer no matter how much I DARE you to answer and prove me wrong.
@DiverseLA To ask for proof of favoritism is impossible, can you "prove" Fox favor Republicans? Did Rupert Murdoch personally tell you "Fox favors Republicans?" Probably not. Tyler is stating an opinion that comes from inductive reasoning, which is the same reasoning people use when they say "Fox is for Republicans"; both are likely correct, but neither have solid proof.
When you ask for something impossible as proof you'll always be "right", at least in your opinion.
@mtb416 I asked for compelling "evidence", not "proof", to be fair. And he has provided none. None at all.
And yes, I can provide compelling evidence that Fox favors Republicans. Fox recently donated $1 million to the Republican Governor's Association this year. Not one cent was donated by Fox to the Democrat's Governor's Association. An objective "news" organization does not fund political campaigns.
Rupert Murdoch in interview agreed with Glenn Beck that Obama is a "racist". And on and on
@DiverseLA There are plenty of left-wing news organizations and journalists that give to Democrats, just be happy that Murdoch discloses his bias whereas your Ted Turners will not make their political contributions public. You sound like a sheep reciting the "Fox News isn't news" mantra; Pardon my French, but it's fucking pathetic. MSNBC is every bit as biased as Fox is. The fact that people deny a liberal bias is proof that stupidity exists.
What you're asking for cannot be provided, just can't
@mtb416 You asked me for evidence that Fox favors Republicans. I provided it to you. Then you went off about other organizations that give to Democrats (without naming anyone). Sorry but that wasn't the question you asked. Try to stay on topic.
@DiverseLA That's why I stated that they do not make things such as that public. I don't even watch Fox, but I do appreciate their honesty in relation to political contributions and political ideology.
Your attempt at semantics surrounding the term "spamming" just a reach on your part. If you don't like my application of the word than I guess I'll say TYT purposely "congest" the politics section.
There are dozens of highly trafficked conservative channels, but they are never featured. Period.
@mtb416 It seems like many conservatives hate facts, citing sources, and providing evidence.
TYT is a weekly news program, that airs 5 days a week. The show is 3 hours long. They cover a wide range of topics. From sports to pop culture to politics. Obviously they're going to upload videos every day. Or should they stop so you'll be happy?
Name the Conservative channels. I will check them out and see how their subscriber base, views, and uploads compare to TYT.
@DiverseLA I've told you over and over again that proving favoritism cannot be done. The only thing I should have done is not use Fox news as an analogy, but only because Murdoch is actually discloses his contributions.
I think TYT have benefited from a certain amount of favoritism and you don't; that's where we are at right now. If you understood my first sentence than you wouldn't be reaching for things like "conservatives hate facts" I've said they clog the politics section and that's true
@mtb416 Can you name some of the Conservatives channels that you're speaking of that have a high viewership that competes with TYT? If I see they have a lot of viewership and aren't being represented, I will directly notify YouTube.
@DiverseLA Why should I answer you when I you're just being a smart ass? TYT has a huge viewership, but perhaps that has stemmed from favoritism. Prove me wrong.
@DiverseLA Or someone who admits they do not have evidence but thinks that favoritism has likely taken place. You only think it's whining because you disagree. And again, since favoritism dispels free market ideals that response is null and void. I can not prove favoritism and you cannot disprove it. Considering viewership numbers could be related to favoritism citing them is not very wise. We can agree to disagree, that's fine by me. Not sure why you so vehemently defend TYT anyways.
@mtb416 No, favoritism & the free market goes hand-in-hand. If a company provides a better product to the consumer, the consumers will have a "favoritism" towards it. That's the same case with TYT compared with its YouTube competitors.
I'm not "vehemently" defending TYT but I am asking you to provide evidence to back up your claims - that YouTube is corruptly keeping TYT at the top of the politics section on purpose.
@DiverseLA Remember what I said about liberals not disclosing their contributions? I love timelines; like Keith Olbermann being suspended for not disclosing political contributions. I don't think he should be suspended, I just think liberals should realize their own hypocrisy.
@mtb416 That's an incorrect comparison. Keither Olbermann is a PRIVATE CITIZEN. There is nothing wrong with Beck, Hannity, or anyone else donating to a Republican with their own money on their own time as a private citizen.
You're trying to compare that to Fox/Newscorp, a place that considers themselves an objective news organization, donating 1 million dollars to the Republican Governor's Association. Funding a political campaign. Fox is not a private citizen.
@DiverseLA People largely ingest what is put in front of their face, which in this case is TYTs.
Ever wonder how terrible movies can sometimes make a killing at the box office? When this happens, and it happens all the time btw, it can usually be attributed to marketing. TylerNull is not whining, he is simply making an observation. Go look at the politics section on YouTube, literally 90% of the videos are from the TYTs. This is due to TYTs spamming as well as a likely favoritism.
@mtb416 But since who appears on the Politics section, or any section, is based on a democratic-style of views, subscriptions, etc. - how is it unfair? Also, TYT consistently uploads at least a dozen videos a day, 5 days a week (or more). I don't see any other political channels on YouTube of TYT's magnitude.
And what evidence do you have that TYT "spams"? I've never seen TYT spam.
@DiverseLA Who says that which appears in the politics section is simply by way of the democratic process? Google's slogan of "Do No Evil" perhaps? The truth is we do not know. Also, I did say spamming is one reason their videos are so widespread, so favoritism is not the only culprit. Since TYT uploads so many videos, with many being pointless, I classify that as spamming. It's a good way to inflate perceived viewership.
You misused the term "spamming". Uploading videos on a site where you're supposed to upload videos, does not constitute as spamming. Calling the videos "pointless" is a subjective opinion of yours. Many people think it has a point and find them interesting.
@DiverseLA I'm not misusing the term spamming. Taking a look at the "politics" section on YouTube it becomes clear they spam YouTube with videos. Calling them pointless is an opinion, but even if they were all great (which is very rare for TYT) it would still be spamming.
@mtb416 Spamming is unsolicited advertising, unsolicited bulk advertising and an abuse of an electronic system. TYT videos, which are uploaded legally, is about disseminating information and not advertising viagra pills or porn and the like.
Who the fuck is this Cenk guy? I just finished seing this clip and I must say he must be the dumbest mother fucker on tv. No wonder msnbc has no ratings.
@varran172 - He's a nobody that no one watches. But guess what, he likes to rewrite history, distort facts, lie, and kiss Obama's ass. Basically he's a good little sheep... err, I mean liberal.
Hey it's the Turd!!!! Sad.... You knock one of the greatest Americans who have lived in our time. Everything this great man did was for the better of our country, with this current president I question his "true" motives. He surrounds himself with socialist (as you are), and steers us into oblivion...Come 11-2-10 we begin to take back OUR Country.
@TheUsman2000 - US MAnn, you must be born in 2000. Live a little, and learn that not everybody who disagrees with you is a socialist. Actually, its people like you that makes me want to call myself a socialist, because anything must be better then you are. You dont know anything about RR, and maybe less about Obama.
@olejac Actually is was born in 1965, and proud to say I cast my first ballot for Ronald Reagan for President 1984. I have no problem debating the views of other Americans, BUT I do question where they are coming from, because some are un-American. I have one question for you... I look at the list of sponsors at the left event at the Lincoln Memorial this past weekend. Full of socialist, communist and people I personally disagree with. Do you reject their support to your cause?
@TheUsman2000 - okay so you were born in 65. I do take offence when you label people you disagree with as un-American, socialists and so on. America was build on dissidence! If you are born in 65 I would hope that you actually can make an argumentation of your point instead of just throwing shit. A socialist is just as american as anybody else. And to your question, I do not have to support or disagree with anybody but you. I am not having a conversation with the sponsors.
@olejac Correction, I have no problem with Americans who share a different view. As a matter of fact I endeavor to discuss politics with my fellow Americans who take a different stance on issues. I find it invigorating, and at times enlightening. I do however take offence to "outsiders" who want to transform my country. You are a self declared socialist (at least you are man enough to admit it), and I along with our forefathers reject your vision.
@TheUsman2000 Again you are labeling people you do not know. Maybe you should ask me for my political view before you make up some BS about who I am. You say you endeavor political discussion, but everything you write tells me differently. All you want to do is call people with views you do not like un-american. In that you belong in the old Russia more then the US. It just do not sound like you understand "land of the free".
@olejac Well lets throw out a few views of where we stand:
1) Redistribution of wealth? As an American I am against it. The people and small business owners have worked hard following the American dream. And to your question, no I am not even close to 250K.
2) Obamacare: Dead against it. The government should not be part of our health care industry, nor are they qualified to manage such a task. This will bankrupt our country.
3) National defense: 100% behind investing in protecting USA.
@TheUsman2000 1. Someone has to pay for you view # 3. Who? The US spent almost 50 % of its income (government income = taxes) on the army. You got mexico to you south, and Canada to you north. The US has not been invaded since ... I dont know. While the US on its hand has invaded/intervened in over 100 countries since 1776. I am 100 % behind Ron Paul when it comes to you view # 3. Obamacare: again someone is actually paying for the those without insurance when they go to hospitals. Who?
@olejac Me and you and all of our country. The number one responsibility of our President is to keep our country safe... period. To your comment on the border north and south... Do not be naive, "they" want to detonate a N explosion on our soil - Wake up to reality. If "they" do not have launch capability they will import and detonate unless we have the measures in place to counter. Wouldn't it be more prudent to go where "they" are and disband the capability? On obamacare - Tune in tomorrow...
@TheUsman2000 - Are they the Soviet Union? Or North Korea? What about China? I can tell you this, "they", have always been around, and you can never win over "they". The truth is, and I think you know this, is that the US created Osama Bin Ladin and his crew. I think I would have joined him if some forign country killed "my pople" and had troops in my country. Would you? What the hell are we doing in Afganistan???? I do know that it has nothing to do with national defense.
@olejac No, "they" are not foreign Governments. We can deal with foreign Governments through absolute US military superiority, or the elements of M.A.D. as a deterrent for powerful N adversaries. "They" are our adversarial groups and cells comprised of people who want to do us harm. In order to keep us safe, these people (who would do us harm) must be tracked down and eliminated as a threat to our country before they enter our country if possible. I will now respond to your 2nd question.
@olejac Yes, back in the 1980's when we were aiding groups who would fight our #1 adversary (the USSR) in Afghanistan, OBL was "created" to use your term. Your talk of what you would do, and what I would do hypothetically has zero bearing on reality. I am an American. I love my country. I have two daughters that I want to believe will do well and be safe in life. As far as Afghanistan goes, I think it is time to leave. We need to be ready for the next international challenge.
@TheUsman2000 You got kids, and so does the farmer in Afganistan or Iraq that got killed by accident by a US solder this week. Where do you think he will go to get his "pay back"? If you love your country, then get dont get mad over the fact that a sick person gets heath care, but more that kids are getting killed by the US government fighting in some crazy country on the other side of the world. WTF
@olejac Reality check. The world is a dangerous place. I hate seeing death and destruction around the world. I share your misery for the death of innocents’. Ronald Reagan had it right "peace through strength". He "avoided" many potential conflicts, and kept us safe. I thank God for the creation of our Country and men like him. Our Country is founded on principles and beliefs that have brought us to where we are.
@TheUsman2000 Reality check ??- God did not create the US - man did. God luck with your lowering of taxes and crazy military spending... that is something that needs a realty check.
@olejac This is another place (and their are many) where our ideologies clash. You have your beliefs, and I have mine. As far as Governmental military spending goes... Again, in my book the #1 responsibility of our Federal Government is to keep us safe. I have no problem paying taxes to support our continued effort. What really gets to me is the wasteful spending and the failure in policy that comes from the left (progressives, liberals, communist, socialist, etc). Call yourself what you want.
@TheUsman2000 Hey, Clown Shoes: It was when the Republicans had total control of both the Executive and Legislature that we went so far into debt that we're probably already doomed to global irrelevance by the middle of the century. And you want failed policy? How about NCLB, Clear Skies, Medicare Pt D ($7 TRILLION!), marching to war on a lie, awarding multi-$billion contracts to Cheney's stock portfolio, and simply losing literally uncountable billions to theft, fraud, and incompetence?
@PDXOutsider "Clown shoes"??? ok. Let me try to enlighten you a bit on history.
1) Ronald Reagan (may his soul RIP) won the cold war. Maybe you missed it? He confronted our adversaries with might, and yes a military build up cost money. But I know now (and even back then) that this was the right thing to do for our Country’s well being. NCLB: ya... If your parents do not work you qualify for this benefit. I would imagine the "illegal immigrants" qualify also right? Let's also discuss amnesty.
@TheUsman2000 I don't have time to build the entire case for how Ronald Reagan was the worst thing to happen to this country since the Vietnam War, but happily, William Kleinknecht has done it for me. The book is The Man Who Sold The World. See also Tear Down This Myth by Will Bunch. As for military buildup, just how much is enough? Do you have any idea what we could achieve if we cut military spending by even ONE percent? And NCLB did nothing but focus on the wrong priorities & lower the bar.
@PDXOutsider Really??? Lets see if our country agrees with you in 2 weeks as the values of this great American (President Ronald Reagan) reemerge into our daily lives. My belief is that we are moving towards more traditional values. And I know while this may be painful for you... Just remember we are one country indivisible by God.
Holy crap, you must have your blinders on, or are so far in denial that you can't accept what's going on around you. You're like the people on the "Hoarders" tv shows. Something is just not right in their cognitive thinking.
Well, people who lean towards one thing will deny the obvious, you can't convince a wacko.
@hawks9nkh To your question "can't accept what's going on around me" - Your right! I can not and will not without fighting for what I believe in. You say I am like the people on "hoarders" (no clue who they are by the way), and call ME a wacko??? Why don't you just call me a responsible American, because that is who I am. Who are you? You sound like one of those outsiders (progressive, socialist or communist) who do not like the values MY country was founded on.
Well you seem to miss the point that CANCER is what killed her. Insurance comp/doctors probably could have saved her, but they didn't kill her. I actually totally agree with you on the profit point. However, most people that are all for Gov't sponsored health care, don't appear to realize that it costs a lot of money to keep people alive and that money needs to come from somewhere. The government does not have a magical, never-ending pot of money.
@illnaturegear, While yes the cancer did kill her, it only was able to do so because her insurance denied her the care that could have prevented it, it's the same thing as saying a bullet is the cause of death, but it wouldn't have been possible without somone pulling the trigger, and while yes Gov't funded care would have it's problems, I would at least have a voice and be able to hold people accountable, insuance companys only concern themselves with stockholders and profit.
@illnaturegear, Many people also don't understand that the U.S pays more money per GDP for healthcare than other nations that provide it for free, meaning we spend more money with a private system, than other nations with a universal coverage, so the current system is what's draining money, not to mention company's in the U.S would benefit more with free healthcare, because they wouldn't be burdened with providing benefits for employee's, and could actually create more jobs.
Reagan failed in his bid for the presidency in '68 & '76. In 1980, he had the good fortune of running during the Iranian hostage crisis. As long as the hostages remained in captivity (See October Surprise 1980.), Mickey Mouse, Stalin, & the Ayatollah would have beaten Carter that year. Hell, my grandmother would have beaten Carter under the circumstances, & she wasn't even alive.
Cenk, I'm a fan. But why does your style change on MSNBC? SLOW DOWN! LOSE THE HIGH PITCH, annoying, shrill, stumbling Bill Oreilly wanna be approach. Go back to the laid back cynic. Your audience is retired people. They can't understand you at this speed
i called the police one time in twenty years where i live because of a prowler it took them an hour to respond i then invested in a 12gauge pump shotgun and i feel much better now
BTW are your forgetting that police and firefighters died trying to save people on 9/11, that's somthing other people have to perform, so are you saying those people who were trapped in those buildings, didn't have right to be helped? and would you really have defended doctors and firefighters who refused service to those injured by the attack? Fox news conserative logic boggles the fucking mind.
@wogdoggy, The gov't can't give rights now? so who were the bill of rights written by again? and who wrote the constitution again? what system inspired those documents?
@wogdoggy ~ you're an idiot. you've lost this argument in nine different ways, yet you continue to ask for a bigger beating.
"the government can't give rights". well sure they can you brain dead idiot, what do you think the """BILL OF RIGHTS"""" is? just in case you aren't familiar with this document, it's called the """CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"""!
@tomitstube sorry tomiboob just because you say I lost doesnt mean its true maybe if you say it 3 times like obama it may have a bigger impact..typical idiot thinks he has the "right " to police protection and thinks the govt can provide rights to healthcare.did you look at the case i reffered to? Better get a gun waiting for your rights to show up.funny how the liberal knows about rights yet doesnt know when one is being taken from him,FUNNY how the govt forces you to buy healthcare..lost right
@tomitstube - When the Bill of Rights were written they were to be thought of as inalienable rights as so clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence. "...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..." The link can be made when you see how in the Decleration of Independence when it Jefferson talks of life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness, a pinnacle point of the Bill of Rights. These are not to be thought of as granted by the government you confused lib,
@veritas8911 ~ do you even know what "unalienable" means? and your getting the declaration, which was a termination of british rule thru grievances with england that led to the revolutionary war.
the constitution and the bill of rights wasn't adopted for another 11 years. it is the constitution, and it's "bill of rights" that is the "supreme law" of the united states. you get that right? supreme LAW. and if it isn't enforced by the government then who enforces it?
@TheDalinkwent they are being provided a service alot of good a so called right did them..you are so damn gullible..govt cant give rights ONLY GOD.govt cant run postoffices and govt produces NOTHING without OUR MONEY..love the clinginess of the generation of me,I need the govt to protect me inspect my food keep the roads open..you obviously enjoy govt taking your lead in life..again some of us are weak natured and love big govt,thats liberals .other people prefer hands off..you know what you are
@wogdoggy, So your calling us the gereration of me, yet you don't think people have a right to healthcare? and only god can give us rights? sorry but it's clear that God is not running this counrty, because if he was, there wouldn't be two cluster fuck wars, everyone would have healthcare(or wouldn't need it) and the poor wouldn't be in dire straits, it's amazing you talk of God, but ignore one of his main teachings, he judges you on how you treat the least of his people.
@TheDalinkwent sorry you DONT have a right to healthcare..who will enforce this RIGHT and how can they do it? how do you MAKE a doctor work or how can you guarantee a right another individual must perform? you give a right yet take a right away? will you FORCE doctors to administer that "right" and what if there are not enough doctors to give you that right? please..the govt cant guarantte you police protection let alone healthcare..get it yet?
@wogdoggy, The main fault in your logic, is that you see healthcare in the same boat as T.V's, cars, and houses, yet healthcare is needed to perserve life, which is somthing you can't seem to grasp, when you say healthcare is not a right, your saying that people who can't afford healthcare, don't have a right for help when they get sick, that's pretty sick an
This is fucking hilarious! lolz
THEGRUNGEMENACE 1 day ago
Cenk has never been right about anything. This was the same guy who really believed Anthony Weiner was telling the truth. I wouldn't listen to Cenk for advice on buying used cars, let alone important political matters.
cfrait1968 6 days ago
this is BULL SHIT! if it wernt for regan we would still be in a cold war or nuked i would vote for regan over any of those runnin now
janbob73 1 week ago
I find none of these statements compelling and most of them are false.
ekul256 3 months ago
Cenk, do you honestly even think any of the Founding Fathers would win today
no way!!
Salvysahagun 7 months ago
HEY I HAVE A SUGGESTION FOR OBAMA: CUT MORE TAXES! LOL
fefe74e 8 months ago
REAGAN WAS A COMMUNIST COMPARED TO TODAY POLITICS!!!!!!!!!
fefe74e 8 months ago 2
om nom nom
tovartalero 8 months ago
the subtitles are done by fox news supporters...utter bullshit!
farhanabdulrahim1 8 months ago
reagan is right on immigration .
123ertr 9 months ago
In 1974 Gerald Ford said "our long national nightmare is over". I wish he was right.
JImmy4336 10 months ago
Yeah but Reagan was white so it makes it ok.
Pokajj5315 11 months ago 2
Stupid argument on the tax rates. Now-a-days the alternative minimum tax, phase out of itemized deductions, limits on mortgage interest deductions, phase out of exemptions and rental losses, increased limits on Soc Sec taxes....blah blah blah, makes the current marginal rates effectively higher today than the rates at the time of Reagan if you do the math....opps liberals can't add...ok.
People don't be duped by this bullshit.
This portrayal is stupidity.Hell Kennedy put out a hit Castro.
onecoolcaldude 11 months ago
@onecoolcaldude Liberals cant do math, but tax cuts pay for themselves? Group think is a terrible thing especially when you have had tow administrations to prove it is wrong. Funny thing is the lowest state when it comes to math are Mississippi and Alabama both are very conservative states
misticspear 9 months ago 2
fuck liberals
varmfarm 11 months ago
This new conservative movement is nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to Obama. The right portrays him as a communist murder machine and rednecks believe it. I really do think that race plays a much bigger role in this than anyone wants to admit. Thats the bad thing about modern racism. It isn't public anymore, so people can just pretend its not there.
executehelenkeller 1 year ago 4
The nation has moved to the right, people are more pessimistic about change and the future and are much more afraid of it.. With good reason, we've gotten in 3 wars in the last 20 years, borrowed 3+ Trillion to fund them and the world is if anything more unstable.. Now the rich are telling the poor they have to belt tighten while they live it up? The absolute hypocrisy and social divide will tear this country apart..
ddnguyen278 1 year ago 2
Cenk for President
FinalAirsoft 1 year ago
Go Cenk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
laug66 1 year ago
I think another president who is way more liberal and certainly wouldn't be considered conservative today is Nixon. Passing the Clean Air Act and EPA, he would be neutered by Mox news. Mox news is fucking crazy!!! FCC get these bitches off!!!!!!
halifaxx55 1 year ago
@halifaxx55 Nixon was also a "dove". He got out of Vietnam, began a period of "detente" with the Soviet Union (which improved global security), brought China in from the cold, and promoted peace and stability in the Middle East by bringing Egypt into the USA's sphere of influence.
And before Nixon, there was Eisenhower.......!
TheFunkadelicFan 1 year ago
@halifaxx55 You're absolutely right about Nixon. I think Reagan could still be elected because he was a big time hypocrite.
steelersguy74 1 year ago
Reagan's fans don't realize how far to the right we've drifted since then.
baigandine 1 year ago 20
Tehrists.
lukegreen37 1 year ago
Obama is no better than Bush. Clinton really was our best modern-day president.
lukegreen37 1 year ago
Why not go both; cut spending and raise taxes.
mit871chell 1 year ago
Reagan ruined the country, so what's your point Cenk?
k94845 1 year ago
Propaganda
brewmaster95060 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brewmaster95060 truth hurts, doesn't it?
HRH787 1 year ago
well our great prez voted to go to war in iraq right along w/republicans y wouldnt he b wishy washy on taxes everyone acts supprised im not
rednecfrmhell 1 year ago
@rednecfrmhell
he voted against the war in iraq.
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
The equivalent of Reagan cutting rates from 70% to 50% would be Obama cutting the top rate of 35% to 25%.
If he's more conservative than Reagan, he'd propose a bigger cut.
Where is it?
jimmyrtle 1 year ago
@jimmyrtle Uhhh not really because it's already so low?
dethbiker 1 year ago
@dethbiker
Rates are 25% higher than after the 1986 tax reform act.
If Obama was conservative (Funny, I know), he'd want to cut them to at least
as low as they were then. If not lower.
jimmyrtle 1 year ago
@jimmyrtle well that's a different point than your previous, which was the logically twisted statement that he's not conservative because he wants to set them at 39% rather than 50%.
dethbiker 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dethbiker
"he's not conservative because he wants to set them at 39% rather than 50%"
No, my point is that Cenk said Reagan was liberal because he wanted tax rates to be 50% (down from 70%) while Obama wants rates to rise to 39.6% (up from 35%).
Maybe Cenk is too stupid to see the difference between raising and lowering rates? He's already too stupid to see the difference between liberal and conservative.
jimmyrtle 1 year ago 2
@jimmyrtle Even conservatives raised taxes to go to war...until now!
baigandine 1 year ago 18
Cenk, how does that shit taste?
Still tasting it after Nov 2? LOL!
jimmyrtle 1 year ago
22 neo-nazis (=moderate republican) desagree with Cenk
Jarmo187 1 year ago
Republicans have won 2/3 of moderate districts, and Democrats have lost many blue dogs. Period.
xaviqaz 1 year ago
Ha young turk, looks to be pritty much a mud slid on you guys. Start packing.
7216sp 1 year ago
I wish I could bitchslap Cenk a hundred times over. The guy is an ego-centric, opportunistic fraud.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416
Correction, he's a YouTube sponsored, "egocentric ... fraud".
The entire front page of YouTube's politics section has been 100% "Turk" 100% of the time, daily, for weeks up to this election. Whereas, everywhere else, even the most popular channels are lucky to get one or two of their videos at the top of their section on any given day.
They did this during the 2008 election cycle too. See the video: "The Politics of Planting".
YouTube is one of Google's political fraud engines.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I can't disagree; I've long noticed the spamming and "front-paging" of TYT on YouTube. Manipulation is at hand everywhere. Since the media and schooling have done such a good job planting leftist propaganda in the minds of those my age they are unable to accept, or even realize, the fact that they are continuously being force fed one side of any given issue. This anti-intellectual wave has benefited Democrats and leftist ideology, so even though I argue factually I rarely make a dent
mtb416 1 year ago
... if the voters of Nevada don't elect her into office, instead of Senator (& Senate Majority Leader) HARRY REID, she recommends 2cnd AMENDMENT REMEDIES as a cure for the HARRY REID problems !! " If someone heeds her advice, and offers a 'REMEDY' by "TAKING OUT" Senator Reid, will Mrs. Angle be held accountable ? I doubt it. History has proven that HATEFUL rhetoric can have VIOLENT yet somewhat predictable consequences. Wake Up. Don't be intimidated by HATRED & EXTREMISM
VOTE November 2cnd.
otherdudeproductions 1 year ago
Hot for Hirabah?
Why does YouTube only allow ONE source of News / Politics on its front page?
TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims, TheYoungMuslims,
EVERY video.
EVERY day.
Day after day.
Week after week.
Dem'rats -- fascists hiding behind an L-word.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You sound angry. Deal with it. The Young Turks dominate and you're mad about it.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
You sound duped and refuse to deal with it.
Of the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of YouTube channels, you actually believe that only ONE fringe Leftist is voted to the top to shut out ALL others -- EVERY VIDEO of the ENTIRE front page of YouTube's Politics section?
EVERY day.
Day after day.
Week after week.
And these are the guys from Air America Media who go bankrupt anywhere & everywhere they've tried to compete -- "dominate" is an odd term for a fraud engine.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull People like The Young Turks. That's why they have so many subscribers, and over 300 million views, and people that vote them to the top.
Deal with it. I didn't see you getting angry that Fox has the most viewers every day and every week compared to the other cable networks.
Instead of getting mad at TYT, how about Conservatives come up with a good online show that can compete?
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
You're claim doesn't pass the common sense test. 100% Leftist Turk 100% of the time is evidence of competition being snuffed out, as socialists do whenever and wherever they can get away with it.
EVERY video on the entire front page?
EVERY day?
Day after day?
Week after week?
Never before has anything like that occurred, even for one day. And it's not a brain teaser to figure out something is rotten. Then again, if your political kind never does allow reality to seep in.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Name one Conservative show on YouTube that is a viable competitor of TYT. Give their name so everyone can see.
Otherwise you're not really making your case other than getting mad that TYT is at the top.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull So you couldn't name one Conservative show on YouTube?
Why are you so angry? Shut the fuck up and stop complaining, sissy. Whining that TYT is popular. Instead of complaining about their success and claiming there's some kind of conspiracy, start your own Conservative YouTube show.
I thought you Cons were about the Free Market? And the Free Market decided TYT is the top dog. So quit your bitchin'.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA So, you can't acknowledge the reality of 100% evidence? Keep posting.
"Why are you so angry? Shut the fuck up"
Liberalism -- the pride & gaiety of spewing ironic idiocies.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Your argument is that YouTube is perhaps in on some conspiracy to keep TYT at the top.
Yet TYT is at the top because people keep voting them at the top. They have a large following, greater than any Conservative political show on YouTube.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Well how about you take action since you believe there's a YouTube conspiracy to keep TYT at the top.
Instead of whining to me?
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Whining? You're projecting.
Perhaps your idiocies are genuine, but I'm quite happy to have mindless dolts like you help me chronicle the mental dysfunctions of Dem'rat devotees.
And I will continue to bitch-slap you with reality as long as you keep helping me. (It's my hobby.)
Any time and everywhere Americans have a CHOICE, they reject the gibberish of fringe Leftists like the Turk. And yet ignoramuses like you believe their 100% shutout here is some kind of honest competition.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull How am I projecting? That would mean I'm whining about TYT being at the top? I'm glad they're at the top and they deserve it.
You're whining.
You're whining.
You're whining.
I asked you several times already to name which Conservative political show should be above TYT, and you've failed to answer each time. If there's a notable competitor, name them! You whining, moaning, sissified coward.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
"How am I projecting?"
How is water wet?
As for your other repeated question, why do you keep ignoring my answer?
100% of the videos being of ONE source, as they are in YouTube's Politics -- and only in YouTube's Politics -- is irrefutable proof there is ZERO competition allowed. Stunningly, your dim bulb keeps pointing to my evidence as if it bolsters your denials of it.
Now, keep whining that I noticed. This is fun.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You have the intellectual fortitude of a slab of dried concrete.
It was not an answer to the question.
Again: Name one Conservative political show on YouTube that has as large of a following (subscribers) as TYT? Name one. Name one. Name one.
You failed to answer, as in name that show. You just whine about TYT being voted to the top. I'm not sure why you're whining to me as if I'm going to change it.
You're a whiner and a sissy. And dumb as a rock.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Again, name one channel hereof that is NOT "Turk".
Your rejection of cold hard evidence isn't evidence of anything else, especially of anyone else's mental deficiencies. (Keep whining that I noticed.)
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You still haven't named which show you think should be beating TYT. You're just whining and whining some more. If you can't name the show, then why complain that TYT is voted the best?
You're like a person that's whining that Kobe Bryant is beating high school kids in basketball but can't name who should be beating him. If there is no competition, he will win every time!
Here's a prediction - in your next response, you won't be able to name which show should be voted at the top.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
"You still haven't" allowed reality to seep in. Instead, you whine that I bitch-slapped you with it.
(That's an observation, not a "prediction".)
"TYT is voted..." -- wrong. There is ZERO voting going on. If there were voting, then there would be more than one channel, as there are everywhere else and with much more popular channels.
Perhaps your idiocies are genuine, but we typically find your political kind are willfully self deceptive, as your posts help me to demonstrate.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You still haven't named the political channel that you think should be topping TYT.
You've still failed.
And you're still whining.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Your irrelevant fetish with opinions still hasn't changed the facts.
And you're still whining that I noticed.
Now, if your Code Stink type knew the meaning of "failed", then you wouldn't keep helping me chronicle all this.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You still haven't named the political channel that you think should be topping TYT, whiner.
Still whining, still can't answer.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Oops, you did it again.
Buck up and acknowledge the fact that 100% Turk 100% of the time has nothing to do with anyone voting on anything.
Either that or keep whining.
And whining.
And whining some more.
That's the only place you fringe Leftists are "topping".
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull
Your argument fails again. Not once did I say TYT wasn't at the top of the Politics section most of the time. In fact, I said it is because of it's popularity.
What you're arguing is that there's a conspiracy by YouTube to keep TYT at the top. It's at the top because of its subscriber base, views, votes, and favorites. You failed to show which Political show should be beating TYT. You only whine & whine some more.
And, you're projecting. You haven't said what I'm whining about.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
You keep insisting that reality is someone's conspiracy theory.
It's not.
ALL the videos on the front page of YouYube's Politics section are ALL "Turk" ALL the time.
That's not an "argument".
Now, everywhere and always elsewhere there are, at most, one or two videos from the most popular YouTube channels at any one time.
Either you are truly too stupid to grasp that realization, or you pose as such with your silly apologetics because your politics can't let reality seep in.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull You're the only person I've seen whine about this. You're the only one I've seen that cares this much. You're crying, pouting, whining, bitching, and moaning.
How about you BE A MAN and DO SOMETHING about it, since this upsets you so much? All you do is whine, whine, whine about TYT being at the top. You have to be the biggest sissy I've ever encountered.
How come you're unable to name another political show on YouTube that can compete with TYT? You faggot.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Once again, princess, the "Turk" is not "at the top".
The "Turk" is the ONLY CHANNEL on the front page, 100% of the time. 100% of the days. The "Turk" is at the top, the bottom, the left, the right, the middle and sideways. Therefore, the "Turk" is YouTube's political fraud engine.
"You're the only person I've seen whine" that someone noticed it.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull And other than whine, what are you going to do about it? Whiner.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
THIS thread is the type of what I'm "doing about it". Thanks again for the help.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Whining isn't doing shit but whining. You're not doing anything. Why not file a lawsuit or have an investigation of corruption against YouTube?
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
"Why not file a lawsuit"
I'm not a Dem'rat, dumbass.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Oh, you mean like the "Birthers" trying to file lawsuits claiming that Obama was born in Kenya?
So your better alternative is to whine on the internet like a sissified bitch?
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
You're projecting again, cupcake. The head of the Birthers is Philip J. Berg, a Democrat party activist, lawyer, and also a Truther. Much like the Warmers, all of America's morons are Dem'rat powered.
Now, calm down and realize that you admitted to my point of YouTube's political fraud engine, only after a week of whining that I posted it.
CHANGE.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Incorrect. The head of the birther movement is Conservative Orly Taitz. Also known as the "Birther Queen".
Pointing out that TYT is at the top of the politics section does not prove anything. You have to cite some actual evidence of wrongdoing. And you also have to cite a competitive politics station that can compete with TYT. You failed to do both, because you are a coward. You're simply whining about TYT being at the top. Nothing more.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Your denials don't change the facts. And it's a bit late to back peddle since you admitted to them, though you did so only to whine that I posted them.
And aside from proving you don't know the meaning of the word "evidence", you' now spread your idiocy to other areas. Your Dem'rat activist is the one who filed the lawsuit challenging the legality of your secular messiah to run for president. He's the leader of the Birther movement.
Seriously, give reality a chance, pumpkin.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull Admitted to what? All I admitted was that The Young Turks is consistently at the top due to its views, ratings, and subscribers. You're claiming there's a conspiracy. You're a bitch and a whiner.
"100%! Wahhhh!"
"100%! Wahhhh!"
"100%! Wahhhh!"
"100%! Wahhhh!"
And it isn't "100%" - that would mean no other videos ever make it on the front. Which is a lie. But TYT is up there a lot and that's because the people want it to be there. Get over it, whiner.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
Now you're denying reality. Cue, but it doesn't make your denials any less so.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I'm asking you to provide evidence that YouTube is guilty of committing some kind of corruption of purposely keeping TYT at the top. You still haven't shown any proof.
You couldn't name another political channel that should be beating TYT. It's a good thing you didn't become a lawyer, because you completely suck and providing any evidence to back up your arguments.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
"I'm asking you to provide evidence"
The video evidence is my evidence.
TYT is NOT "at the top". If they were "at the top", then they would have a video or two, most days, "at the top". Not 23 of all 23, every day, every week, as they have.
I'm NOT asking you to allow reality to seep in. I'm merely chronicling your rejection of it. It's nothing personal, I just like bitch slapping your political kind with reality, and having you record the manner by which you reject it.
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull What video evidence? What video link have you posted?
Provide evidence that YouTube is corruptly causing TYT to remain at the top of the Politics section. You still continue to fail at providing evidence.
You still continue to fail to name a competitive Political show on YouTube that competes with TYT. You continue to fail. You know why? Because you have no answer. You know you can't answer no matter how much I DARE you to answer and prove me wrong.
You are a whining sissy & a fool
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA
"What video evidence"
In the end, Dem'rats simply cover their eyes and taunt "You can't see me".
Cute, for a 5 yr old.
TylerNull 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TylerNull In other words, you have no video evidence.
You are an incessant liar who wouldn't know how to back up his own argument if you were led by the hand. You are a spineless, shallow fool.
Learn to back up an argument for the first time in your life.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TylerNull You still have failed to provide any evidence. None at all.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TylerNull You have still failed to provide any evidence, whiner.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
Comment removed
DiverseLA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TylerNull You have still failed to provide evidence, whiner.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA To ask for proof of favoritism is impossible, can you "prove" Fox favor Republicans? Did Rupert Murdoch personally tell you "Fox favors Republicans?" Probably not. Tyler is stating an opinion that comes from inductive reasoning, which is the same reasoning people use when they say "Fox is for Republicans"; both are likely correct, but neither have solid proof.
When you ask for something impossible as proof you'll always be "right", at least in your opinion.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 I asked for compelling "evidence", not "proof", to be fair. And he has provided none. None at all.
And yes, I can provide compelling evidence that Fox favors Republicans. Fox recently donated $1 million to the Republican Governor's Association this year. Not one cent was donated by Fox to the Democrat's Governor's Association. An objective "news" organization does not fund political campaigns.
Rupert Murdoch in interview agreed with Glenn Beck that Obama is a "racist". And on and on
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA There are plenty of left-wing news organizations and journalists that give to Democrats, just be happy that Murdoch discloses his bias whereas your Ted Turners will not make their political contributions public. You sound like a sheep reciting the "Fox News isn't news" mantra; Pardon my French, but it's fucking pathetic. MSNBC is every bit as biased as Fox is. The fact that people deny a liberal bias is proof that stupidity exists.
What you're asking for cannot be provided, just can't
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 You asked me for evidence that Fox favors Republicans. I provided it to you. Then you went off about other organizations that give to Democrats (without naming anyone). Sorry but that wasn't the question you asked. Try to stay on topic.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA That's why I stated that they do not make things such as that public. I don't even watch Fox, but I do appreciate their honesty in relation to political contributions and political ideology.
Your attempt at semantics surrounding the term "spamming" just a reach on your part. If you don't like my application of the word than I guess I'll say TYT purposely "congest" the politics section.
There are dozens of highly trafficked conservative channels, but they are never featured. Period.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 It seems like many conservatives hate facts, citing sources, and providing evidence.
TYT is a weekly news program, that airs 5 days a week. The show is 3 hours long. They cover a wide range of topics. From sports to pop culture to politics. Obviously they're going to upload videos every day. Or should they stop so you'll be happy?
Name the Conservative channels. I will check them out and see how their subscriber base, views, and uploads compare to TYT.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA I've told you over and over again that proving favoritism cannot be done. The only thing I should have done is not use Fox news as an analogy, but only because Murdoch is actually discloses his contributions.
I think TYT have benefited from a certain amount of favoritism and you don't; that's where we are at right now. If you understood my first sentence than you wouldn't be reaching for things like "conservatives hate facts" I've said they clog the politics section and that's true
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 Can you name some of the Conservatives channels that you're speaking of that have a high viewership that competes with TYT? If I see they have a lot of viewership and aren't being represented, I will directly notify YouTube.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA Why should I answer you when I you're just being a smart ass? TYT has a huge viewership, but perhaps that has stemmed from favoritism. Prove me wrong.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 The reason is because you have no answer. When you make an accusation, you're supposed to have something supporting your accusation.
Only a childish clown just makes an accusation out of the blue with NOTHING to back it up. It's whining.
TYT has huge viewership because it has huge viewership. And yes it is "favoritism" - favoritism among the viewers. How is that a bad thing?
I thought you Conservatives believed in the free market? The free market says TYT is successful. Deal with it.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA Or someone who admits they do not have evidence but thinks that favoritism has likely taken place. You only think it's whining because you disagree. And again, since favoritism dispels free market ideals that response is null and void. I can not prove favoritism and you cannot disprove it. Considering viewership numbers could be related to favoritism citing them is not very wise. We can agree to disagree, that's fine by me. Not sure why you so vehemently defend TYT anyways.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 No, favoritism & the free market goes hand-in-hand. If a company provides a better product to the consumer, the consumers will have a "favoritism" towards it. That's the same case with TYT compared with its YouTube competitors.
I'm not "vehemently" defending TYT but I am asking you to provide evidence to back up your claims - that YouTube is corruptly keeping TYT at the top of the politics section on purpose.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA Remember what I said about liberals not disclosing their contributions? I love timelines; like Keith Olbermann being suspended for not disclosing political contributions. I don't think he should be suspended, I just think liberals should realize their own hypocrisy.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 That's an incorrect comparison. Keither Olbermann is a PRIVATE CITIZEN. There is nothing wrong with Beck, Hannity, or anyone else donating to a Republican with their own money on their own time as a private citizen.
You're trying to compare that to Fox/Newscorp, a place that considers themselves an objective news organization, donating 1 million dollars to the Republican Governor's Association. Funding a political campaign. Fox is not a private citizen.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA I also never said they couldn't spam the hell out of YouTube either.
mtb416 1 year ago
@DiverseLA People largely ingest what is put in front of their face, which in this case is TYTs.
Ever wonder how terrible movies can sometimes make a killing at the box office? When this happens, and it happens all the time btw, it can usually be attributed to marketing. TylerNull is not whining, he is simply making an observation. Go look at the politics section on YouTube, literally 90% of the videos are from the TYTs. This is due to TYTs spamming as well as a likely favoritism.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 But since who appears on the Politics section, or any section, is based on a democratic-style of views, subscriptions, etc. - how is it unfair? Also, TYT consistently uploads at least a dozen videos a day, 5 days a week (or more). I don't see any other political channels on YouTube of TYT's magnitude.
And what evidence do you have that TYT "spams"? I've never seen TYT spam.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA Who says that which appears in the politics section is simply by way of the democratic process? Google's slogan of "Do No Evil" perhaps? The truth is we do not know. Also, I did say spamming is one reason their videos are so widespread, so favoritism is not the only culprit. Since TYT uploads so many videos, with many being pointless, I classify that as spamming. It's a good way to inflate perceived viewership.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 So if you admit that "we do not know"
You misused the term "spamming". Uploading videos on a site where you're supposed to upload videos, does not constitute as spamming. Calling the videos "pointless" is a subjective opinion of yours. Many people think it has a point and find them interesting.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
@DiverseLA I'm not misusing the term spamming. Taking a look at the "politics" section on YouTube it becomes clear they spam YouTube with videos. Calling them pointless is an opinion, but even if they were all great (which is very rare for TYT) it would still be spamming.
mtb416 1 year ago
@mtb416 Spamming is unsolicited advertising, unsolicited bulk advertising and an abuse of an electronic system. TYT videos, which are uploaded legally, is about disseminating information and not advertising viagra pills or porn and the like.
DiverseLA 1 year ago
Cenk Uygur is a liar and a hack!
bjoh249 1 year ago
@bjoh249
Correction, ... billionaire funded "liar and a hack". Soros is on Jihad against America.
TylerNull 1 year ago
Correction Cenk: Obama did cut and run from Iraq. Is he therefore unreelectable?
thereprieve 1 year ago
very good...
mirhacmistefa 1 year ago
Who the fuck is this Cenk guy? I just finished seing this clip and I must say he must be the dumbest mother fucker on tv. No wonder msnbc has no ratings.
varran172 1 year ago
@varran172 - He's a nobody that no one watches. But guess what, he likes to rewrite history, distort facts, lie, and kiss Obama's ass. Basically he's a good little sheep... err, I mean liberal.
thereprieve 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN . COM
nevervoterepublican . com
thudmother 1 year ago
Hey it's the Turd!!!! Sad.... You knock one of the greatest Americans who have lived in our time. Everything this great man did was for the better of our country, with this current president I question his "true" motives. He surrounds himself with socialist (as you are), and steers us into oblivion...Come 11-2-10 we begin to take back OUR Country.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 - US MAnn, you must be born in 2000. Live a little, and learn that not everybody who disagrees with you is a socialist. Actually, its people like you that makes me want to call myself a socialist, because anything must be better then you are. You dont know anything about RR, and maybe less about Obama.
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac Actually is was born in 1965, and proud to say I cast my first ballot for Ronald Reagan for President 1984. I have no problem debating the views of other Americans, BUT I do question where they are coming from, because some are un-American. I have one question for you... I look at the list of sponsors at the left event at the Lincoln Memorial this past weekend. Full of socialist, communist and people I personally disagree with. Do you reject their support to your cause?
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 - okay so you were born in 65. I do take offence when you label people you disagree with as un-American, socialists and so on. America was build on dissidence! If you are born in 65 I would hope that you actually can make an argumentation of your point instead of just throwing shit. A socialist is just as american as anybody else. And to your question, I do not have to support or disagree with anybody but you. I am not having a conversation with the sponsors.
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac Correction, I have no problem with Americans who share a different view. As a matter of fact I endeavor to discuss politics with my fellow Americans who take a different stance on issues. I find it invigorating, and at times enlightening. I do however take offence to "outsiders" who want to transform my country. You are a self declared socialist (at least you are man enough to admit it), and I along with our forefathers reject your vision.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 Again you are labeling people you do not know. Maybe you should ask me for my political view before you make up some BS about who I am. You say you endeavor political discussion, but everything you write tells me differently. All you want to do is call people with views you do not like un-american. In that you belong in the old Russia more then the US. It just do not sound like you understand "land of the free".
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac Well lets throw out a few views of where we stand:
1) Redistribution of wealth? As an American I am against it. The people and small business owners have worked hard following the American dream. And to your question, no I am not even close to 250K.
2) Obamacare: Dead against it. The government should not be part of our health care industry, nor are they qualified to manage such a task. This will bankrupt our country.
3) National defense: 100% behind investing in protecting USA.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 1. Someone has to pay for you view # 3. Who? The US spent almost 50 % of its income (government income = taxes) on the army. You got mexico to you south, and Canada to you north. The US has not been invaded since ... I dont know. While the US on its hand has invaded/intervened in over 100 countries since 1776. I am 100 % behind Ron Paul when it comes to you view # 3. Obamacare: again someone is actually paying for the those without insurance when they go to hospitals. Who?
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac Me and you and all of our country. The number one responsibility of our President is to keep our country safe... period. To your comment on the border north and south... Do not be naive, "they" want to detonate a N explosion on our soil - Wake up to reality. If "they" do not have launch capability they will import and detonate unless we have the measures in place to counter. Wouldn't it be more prudent to go where "they" are and disband the capability? On obamacare - Tune in tomorrow...
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 - Are they the Soviet Union? Or North Korea? What about China? I can tell you this, "they", have always been around, and you can never win over "they". The truth is, and I think you know this, is that the US created Osama Bin Ladin and his crew. I think I would have joined him if some forign country killed "my pople" and had troops in my country. Would you? What the hell are we doing in Afganistan???? I do know that it has nothing to do with national defense.
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac No, "they" are not foreign Governments. We can deal with foreign Governments through absolute US military superiority, or the elements of M.A.D. as a deterrent for powerful N adversaries. "They" are our adversarial groups and cells comprised of people who want to do us harm. In order to keep us safe, these people (who would do us harm) must be tracked down and eliminated as a threat to our country before they enter our country if possible. I will now respond to your 2nd question.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@olejac Yes, back in the 1980's when we were aiding groups who would fight our #1 adversary (the USSR) in Afghanistan, OBL was "created" to use your term. Your talk of what you would do, and what I would do hypothetically has zero bearing on reality. I am an American. I love my country. I have two daughters that I want to believe will do well and be safe in life. As far as Afghanistan goes, I think it is time to leave. We need to be ready for the next international challenge.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 You got kids, and so does the farmer in Afganistan or Iraq that got killed by accident by a US solder this week. Where do you think he will go to get his "pay back"? If you love your country, then get dont get mad over the fact that a sick person gets heath care, but more that kids are getting killed by the US government fighting in some crazy country on the other side of the world. WTF
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac Reality check. The world is a dangerous place. I hate seeing death and destruction around the world. I share your misery for the death of innocents’. Ronald Reagan had it right "peace through strength". He "avoided" many potential conflicts, and kept us safe. I thank God for the creation of our Country and men like him. Our Country is founded on principles and beliefs that have brought us to where we are.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 Reality check ??- God did not create the US - man did. God luck with your lowering of taxes and crazy military spending... that is something that needs a realty check.
olejac 1 year ago
@olejac This is another place (and their are many) where our ideologies clash. You have your beliefs, and I have mine. As far as Governmental military spending goes... Again, in my book the #1 responsibility of our Federal Government is to keep us safe. I have no problem paying taxes to support our continued effort. What really gets to me is the wasteful spending and the failure in policy that comes from the left (progressives, liberals, communist, socialist, etc). Call yourself what you want.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 Hey, Clown Shoes: It was when the Republicans had total control of both the Executive and Legislature that we went so far into debt that we're probably already doomed to global irrelevance by the middle of the century. And you want failed policy? How about NCLB, Clear Skies, Medicare Pt D ($7 TRILLION!), marching to war on a lie, awarding multi-$billion contracts to Cheney's stock portfolio, and simply losing literally uncountable billions to theft, fraud, and incompetence?
PDXOutsider 1 year ago
@PDXOutsider "Clown shoes"??? ok. Let me try to enlighten you a bit on history.
1) Ronald Reagan (may his soul RIP) won the cold war. Maybe you missed it? He confronted our adversaries with might, and yes a military build up cost money. But I know now (and even back then) that this was the right thing to do for our Country’s well being. NCLB: ya... If your parents do not work you qualify for this benefit. I would imagine the "illegal immigrants" qualify also right? Let's also discuss amnesty.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000 I don't have time to build the entire case for how Ronald Reagan was the worst thing to happen to this country since the Vietnam War, but happily, William Kleinknecht has done it for me. The book is The Man Who Sold The World. See also Tear Down This Myth by Will Bunch. As for military buildup, just how much is enough? Do you have any idea what we could achieve if we cut military spending by even ONE percent? And NCLB did nothing but focus on the wrong priorities & lower the bar.
PDXOutsider 1 year ago
@PDXOutsider Really??? Lets see if our country agrees with you in 2 weeks as the values of this great American (President Ronald Reagan) reemerge into our daily lives. My belief is that we are moving towards more traditional values. And I know while this may be painful for you... Just remember we are one country indivisible by God.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
@TheUsman2000
Holy crap, you must have your blinders on, or are so far in denial that you can't accept what's going on around you. You're like the people on the "Hoarders" tv shows. Something is just not right in their cognitive thinking.
Well, people who lean towards one thing will deny the obvious, you can't convince a wacko.
hawks9nkh 1 year ago
@hawks9nkh To your question "can't accept what's going on around me" - Your right! I can not and will not without fighting for what I believe in. You say I am like the people on "hoarders" (no clue who they are by the way), and call ME a wacko??? Why don't you just call me a responsible American, because that is who I am. Who are you? You sound like one of those outsiders (progressive, socialist or communist) who do not like the values MY country was founded on.
TheUsman2000 1 year ago
Well you seem to miss the point that CANCER is what killed her. Insurance comp/doctors probably could have saved her, but they didn't kill her. I actually totally agree with you on the profit point. However, most people that are all for Gov't sponsored health care, don't appear to realize that it costs a lot of money to keep people alive and that money needs to come from somewhere. The government does not have a magical, never-ending pot of money.
illnaturegear 1 year ago
@illnaturegear, While yes the cancer did kill her, it only was able to do so because her insurance denied her the care that could have prevented it, it's the same thing as saying a bullet is the cause of death, but it wouldn't have been possible without somone pulling the trigger, and while yes Gov't funded care would have it's problems, I would at least have a voice and be able to hold people accountable, insuance companys only concern themselves with stockholders and profit.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@illnaturegear, Many people also don't understand that the U.S pays more money per GDP for healthcare than other nations that provide it for free, meaning we spend more money with a private system, than other nations with a universal coverage, so the current system is what's draining money, not to mention company's in the U.S would benefit more with free healthcare, because they wouldn't be burdened with providing benefits for employee's, and could actually create more jobs.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
"The problem with our liberal friends is not because they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
Amen.
NAGGERNUTZ 1 year ago
Reagan: Timing and Context
Reagan failed in his bid for the presidency in '68 & '76. In 1980, he had the good fortune of running during the Iranian hostage crisis. As long as the hostages remained in captivity (See October Surprise 1980.), Mickey Mouse, Stalin, & the Ayatollah would have beaten Carter that year. Hell, my grandmother would have beaten Carter under the circumstances, & she wasn't even alive.
We made things in this country before Reagan.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 1 year ago
Cenk, you are a buffoon.
jag10 1 year ago
Cenk, I'm a fan. But why does your style change on MSNBC? SLOW DOWN! LOSE THE HIGH PITCH, annoying, shrill, stumbling Bill Oreilly wanna be approach. Go back to the laid back cynic. Your audience is retired people. They can't understand you at this speed
JustinTymeToday 1 year ago
I'm not so sure that the current arms deal with Saudi Arabia is any different than negotiating with terrorists.
I can't believe a "liberal" like Cenk wouldn't praise Reagan for leaving Lebanon.
Reagan failed miserably at keeping fulfilling his campaign promises.
VictoryCough 1 year ago
i called the police one time in twenty years where i live because of a prowler it took them an hour to respond i then invested in a 12gauge pump shotgun and i feel much better now
dragonflychainsaw 1 year ago
dalinkwent= total idiot
google rights to police protection..LOL
keep trying libtard
wogdoggy 1 year ago
BTW are your forgetting that police and firefighters died trying to save people on 9/11, that's somthing other people have to perform, so are you saying those people who were trapped in those buildings, didn't have right to be helped? and would you really have defended doctors and firefighters who refused service to those injured by the attack? Fox news conserative logic boggles the fucking mind.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwenimagine 100 doctors because many quot during obama care
imagine 300 people sick
imagine how well they are providiing you that right..the GOVT cant give rights MORON
wogdoggy 1 year ago
@wogdoggy, The gov't can't give rights now? so who were the bill of rights written by again? and who wrote the constitution again? what system inspired those documents?
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@wogdoggy ~ you're an idiot. you've lost this argument in nine different ways, yet you continue to ask for a bigger beating.
"the government can't give rights". well sure they can you brain dead idiot, what do you think the """BILL OF RIGHTS"""" is? just in case you aren't familiar with this document, it's called the """CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"""!
tomitstube 1 year ago
@tomitstube sorry tomiboob just because you say I lost doesnt mean its true maybe if you say it 3 times like obama it may have a bigger impact..typical idiot thinks he has the "right " to police protection and thinks the govt can provide rights to healthcare.did you look at the case i reffered to? Better get a gun waiting for your rights to show up.funny how the liberal knows about rights yet doesnt know when one is being taken from him,FUNNY how the govt forces you to buy healthcare..lost right
wogdoggy 1 year ago
@tomitstube - When the Bill of Rights were written they were to be thought of as inalienable rights as so clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence. "...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..." The link can be made when you see how in the Decleration of Independence when it Jefferson talks of life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness, a pinnacle point of the Bill of Rights. These are not to be thought of as granted by the government you confused lib,
veritas8911 1 year ago
@veritas8911 ~ do you even know what "unalienable" means? and your getting the declaration, which was a termination of british rule thru grievances with england that led to the revolutionary war.
the constitution and the bill of rights wasn't adopted for another 11 years. it is the constitution, and it's "bill of rights" that is the "supreme law" of the united states. you get that right? supreme LAW. and if it isn't enforced by the government then who enforces it?
tomitstube 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent they are being provided a service alot of good a so called right did them..you are so damn gullible..govt cant give rights ONLY GOD.govt cant run postoffices and govt produces NOTHING without OUR MONEY..love the clinginess of the generation of me,I need the govt to protect me inspect my food keep the roads open..you obviously enjoy govt taking your lead in life..again some of us are weak natured and love big govt,thats liberals .other people prefer hands off..you know what you are
wogdoggy 1 year ago
@wogdoggy, So your calling us the gereration of me, yet you don't think people have a right to healthcare? and only god can give us rights? sorry but it's clear that God is not running this counrty, because if he was, there wouldn't be two cluster fuck wars, everyone would have healthcare(or wouldn't need it) and the poor wouldn't be in dire straits, it's amazing you talk of God, but ignore one of his main teachings, he judges you on how you treat the least of his people.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent sorry you DONT have a right to healthcare..who will enforce this RIGHT and how can they do it? how do you MAKE a doctor work or how can you guarantee a right another individual must perform? you give a right yet take a right away? will you FORCE doctors to administer that "right" and what if there are not enough doctors to give you that right? please..the govt cant guarantte you police protection let alone healthcare..get it yet?
wogdoggy 1 year ago
@wogdoggy, The main fault in your logic, is that you see healthcare in the same boat as T.V's, cars, and houses, yet healthcare is needed to perserve life, which is somthing you can't seem to grasp, when you say healthcare is not a right, your saying that people who can't afford healthcare, don't have a right for help when they get sick, that's pretty sick an