I really liked this video and the fact that it made things so clear, even though I still don't agree with nationalism.
However, could you explain what internationalism is in this case? I heard a nationalist say that internationalism, unlike cosmopolitanism, goes hand in hand with nationalism.
@EmperorFishFinger Well, as far as I'm concerned, internationalism is the absolute opposite of nationalism. I'm ill at the moment, and therefore do not trust my ability to present my take on internationalism. It's a good video topic for the future though, so I'll definitely approach this in the future.
Actually what you are promoting here, and doing well so, is ETHNOPLURALISM, not Nationalism. Thats why this Contradiction appeared. Nationalism is just the naked urge, to make your nation stronger. Ist very much linked with the modern Nationstate. It can occur under a) marxist, b)imperialist, or c)racist cirmcunstances, depending if you want to gain power and supremacy for your a)wordl revolution b)world governement c) race.
However only ethnopluralism implies the protection of peoples per se.
@Thesystemisantiwhite You are really intelligent, eloquent and fierce- . I appreciate your great work- and you are a obviously metalhead :D :D Thats the way i like it!!
No, mate...these things you've touched on are just a couple of aspects of Nationalism that you have linguistically garnished to appear as "fundamental tenets" that define the whole concept. Nice try. The whole paradigm of "race" and "nationhood" are a means of segregation (which, in turn, is a tool of oppression) and, as such, are a dangerous and corruptive force. There are no "races" - you and I are descendants of black ancestors - we are ALL brothers and sisters and the World is one nation.
@saxongreen78 In which case, I'm sure you have no problem with colonialism, genocide and cultural imperialism. Nationalism is the only means whereby these things can be rejected.
Every ethnic group has the right to self autonomy.
@Thesystemisantiwhite Ah...sure, that MUST be the logical conclusion, I don't think. "Rights" can be construed in many ways - but when they are used to support an argument that seeks to reverse and deny history (like ethnic nationalism) they become plastic and are blindly flung around as if they are natural law. Historically, England (and all other imperial powers) didn't give too much of a fuck about the "rights" of other countries...invade a country = recieve its immigrants. Get used to it.
@saxongreen78 I do not seek to reverse or deny history.
I do not believe in natural law.
Historically they don't, correct, that doesn't mean they shouldn't in the future. Nor does it mean that these same rights should be denied to England. If you believe a whole nation shares collective guilt for a crime committed almost a hundred years ago, you're a racist. Period.
If a nation can, justly, possess collective guilt, it can also, equally justly, possess collective pride.
@Thesystemisantiwhite Classifying England as an "Anglo-Saxon Country" is a fantasy - it's too late, baby (besides, it never was!) If everyone saw all people as one race, there'd be no Geno to cide...you just disproved your own argument while making absurd and baseless accusations - and that's never a good look. Ethnic purity is pure fallacy - and even if there was such a thing as a "pure line", the benefits of preserving one are non-existent or dubious at best. Science is on MY side.
@saxongreen78 Oh dear, you've shot yourself in the foot.
Ethnic purity is irrelevant. However, the DNA of the indigenous English has been identified and is held by 70% of the population, as illustrated by the genealogical studies of Oxford Professor Bryan Sykes.
You're right, we aren't an anglo-saxon country - our genetic lineage is much deeper than the saxon migration.
@Thesystemisantiwhite ...and what's this shit about not wanting an "ethnic nation" - you can't make a whole argument based on Nationalism and "anti-white racism" *snigger* and then accuse me of bringing up "shaky" arguments because I happen to mention Eugenics. "The holocaust was no genocide." Well, what was it, then? A church Fete? A Lamington Drive? You are the MASTER of the non-sequiter, mon frere! It's you who lives in Fantasy Land...ease up on the pomosity and beef-up your arguments.
@saxongreen78 I was being sarcastic. According to you, the holocaust can't be a genocide as there is no 'geno to cide'. I disagree. In order to recognise genocide, you must recognise ethnicity - or at least acknowledge its mutual recognition.
What happens to the 30%? Nothing. Why are you jumping to a 'happening'?
You haven't made any arguments, you're typing, yet managing to say nothing at the same time.
@Thesystemisantiwhite The main reason I've sought to debate you is that you seem to vacillate quite a bit about what you actually want. It's hard to pin you down - Ethnic Nationalism is a mighty big firestick to be waving around, with many implications for many people...yet I sense that you think it involves just a minor adjustment. Whites are being victimised en masse? - bullshit. And, yes - the rise & fall of the Empire is bittersweet - you can't pick & choose the bits you want to swallow.
So it's funny to you that whites are more likely to be killed on the basis of their ethnicity in this country than non-whites? That's 'snigger' worthy, to you? Yet you have the utter nerve to accuse me of exclusion!?
@Thesystemisantiwhite You only think I'm saying nothing because you don't like my arguments. I'll reiterate - Nationalism is already an emotive and complex issue...when you couple it with "race," it becomes explosive. My main problem with your argument is the glib way you gloss over the messy, unpleasant consequences of imposing arbitrary boundaries of race, in a context of real & constant flux, upon our common reality - one borne of a long history of migration and invasion.
@saxongreen78 'My main problem with your argument is the glib way you gloss over the messy, unpleasant consequences of imposing arbitrary boundaries of race, in a context of real & constant flux, upon our common reality - one borne of a long history of migration and invasion. '
Now you've said something, and I do hold respect for postmodern critiques to this effect, and have thought on it deeply, and is the main reason I do not subscribe to a solely 'blood and soil' nationalism.
@saxongreen78 'If everyone saw all people as one race, there'd be no Geno to cide'
You live in a fantasy land. The holocaust was no genocide. Nor was the Holodomor, or Sadame's treatment of Kurds - after all, where is the Geno!? If you honestly believe people will abandon their ethnic identity, you're delusional. The Soviet's tried this - off to the Gulag, my son!
'Ethnic purity is pure fallacy'
Never said it wasn't, and you bringing it up is evidence of your shaky terrain.
@Thesystemisantiwhite Who are you calling "son", mate? And "shaky terrain" - I'm not the one who thinks the "system" is "anti-white"! X0 The "system" IS white. Hey, man - enough with the accusations and emotive references to Gulag, or Genocide, or Dogma or "collective guilt" because you are WAY off the mark. It's typical right-wing manipulation and it just identifies you as a potential "straw man" to all reasonable readers of these comments. Oh, and it's Saddam - he wasn't French...
@Thesystemisantiwhite As for National Pride - what has anyone got to be "proud" of in just being born in a certain country? The acheivements of the Industrial Revolution, the English Language and the Empire weren't your achievements, or any other living Englishman's. You can feel GLAD to be British, glad to be in England - but pride and exclusion do no favours for anyone...particularly when the definition of England is being made smaller, less diverse. The World has changed - for the better.
@saxongreen78 Nor does multiculturalism and exclusion.
You seem to arbitrarily match exclusion to the end of your statements. It's transparent.
Slavery wasn't any Englishman's, or my, achievement, nor was colonialism. So, also by your logic, I shouldn't reap the negative repercussions of this. You have a double standard.
Not only are you ignorant of the verifiable genetic mapping of the indigenous English, you also refuse to take your stance to its logical end.
@Thesystemisantiwhite ...again, putting words in my mouth. You may THINK that just saying shit enough will make it so, but I'm here to tell you that you've got a long way to go if you seek to pull the wool over MY eyes. One minute you seem to be distancing yourself from your desire for ethnic nationhood based on racial purity, next you're spouting some guff about "indigenous English." Make your mind up. What happens to the other 30% of Britons who aren't "your kind"? Well? I'm listening.
@Thesystemisantiwhite See what I mean? Why even mention "genetic mapping" in your arguments when you don't even have the guts to own up to your obsession with race as a definitive factor of nationhood? Even your username is racially-charged...yet you seem to shy away from any possible negative connotations that may have. This flip-flopping and vacillation is infuriating to the reader and viewer alike. You either want racial segregation, or you don't...pick one, or forever hold your peace.
@Thesystemisantiwhite The race is crucial factor for every ethnic group and every ethnic group need space to live in peace and have a future, so the invasion of such space form a multitude of foreigners is bad for the peace and future of a ethnic group.
@saxongreen78 'you've got a long way to go if you seek to pull the wool over MY eyes'
I don't seek to pull wool over anyone's eyes. I needn't do so. If anything, I seek to remove it! Let the light shine on the injustices of this racist episteme.
@saxongreen78 Yes, the World has changed for the better, the english are in the way to became a minority in England. How can anyone say that this isn't for the better?
@saxongreen78 Why you disagree with nationalism? Is because you don't believe that are diferent races? Well, according to the english laws there are such a thing.
just look at america when it was dominate white, it was always inventing new things and the country was proud.people around the world envied america,now we are a laughing stock and degraded morally .
A society organized according to the fundamental principles of Nationalism will represent a completely homogeneous structure, from a racial point of view, for the very idea of "nation" presupposes racial homogenity. The subjects inhabiting the territory will acquire citizenship and all the resulting rights that accompany it, not on the grounds of place of birth, but entirely on racial grounds. People will be encouraged to propagate by the introduction of special welfare-support programmes...
"Nationalism is a political ideology that involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms, i.e. a nation. In the 'modernist' image of the nation, it is nationalism that creates national identity" - Wikipedia
@z3r0Projects I disagree with that definition as I disagree with the modernist conception of the nation. Nationalism predates Modernism. Consult Anthony Smith's 'Ethnic Origins of Nations'.
A little message to English nationlists. If a liberal tells you that you cannot identify England as anglo-Saxon, as england is a nation of immigrants, your immediate reply should be 'Would you then not class Scotland, and Wales as Celtic Nations?" It dumbfounds them. Why? It is accepted in day-to-day society that these are Celtic nations. For them to say Yes, is Liberal Hypcrosy, as they can associate one british nation to a ethnic/cultural group but not another.
@TemplarReturn "Race" & "Nationalism" are divisive and arbitrary and stupid. Guess what? You, me and all whites are descendants of black Africans who walked into Europe thousands of years ago - we're all the same "race." Your alleged shutdown for liberals can be instantly turned into dogshit, as far as I can see. I would argue that NO nations can be ethnically-defined in 2012...how's that grab ya?
how can you say a nationalist can be a nazi? the nazis believe that the nurdic race is superior and the only race capable of creating true culture worthy of the name and hence has the right to expend to lands of inferior races, use their resources and enslave them. according to the nazis some ethnic groups are so bad (jews gypsis) that they must be exterminated. but you said nationalists believe every ethnic group has the right to existence and self determination. so can you explain it to me?
@goblinclaus I realised this contradiction after releasing the video.
Nationalism doesn't have to be tied with ideas of cultural relativism, though. But yes, I agree with you. I guess it depends largely on how you define National Socialism. There are, for example, black Nazis, Mongolian Nazis etc who don't hold such views regarding Aryan supremacy and the promotion of genocide, I'd assume many white Nazis would be similar, although I don't know.
In Europe before the development of patriotism/nationalism,people were generally loyal to a city/village(regionalism,the traceable/practical community,rather than the grand and abstract community)and/or to a particular leader(often a noble,many times with deep blood ties with nobles of other entities,even far away,and rather distinct ethnically in regard to the populations he ruled) rather than to their nation.
It can also include the belief that the state is of primary importance(unhistorical,unnatural/artificially acquired),or the belief that one state is naturally(this is light fascism,inhuman and unnatural/artificial)) superior to all other states.It is also used to describe a movement to establish or protect a 'homeland' (usually an autonomous state) for an ethnic group. In some cases the identification of a national culture is combined with a negative view of other "races" or cultures.
It can be a belief that citizenship in a state should be limited to one ethnic(unnatural,inhuman,unhistorical),cultural(old and legitimate patriotism),religious, or identity group, or that multinationality in a single state should necessarily comprise the right to express and exercise national identity even by minorities.
Nationalism is a political ideology that involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms, i.e. a nation. In the 'modernist' image of the nation,it is nationalism that creates national identity.
Thankyou for defining Nationalism So now, hopefully, we wont have RACIST thrown in our Faces for being Nationalists--We now have a very clear, Lucid Description,,,& the LAST thing Nationalism is, is Racist!! Its MAD to even have to think we need to debate this!! BUT WE DO! Anti Racist=Anti-White...& Whites, as ANY other RACE has the right to their own identity/Country/Culture /Identity-Kids today Seemingly YEARN to be accepted by the blacks--WHY? As if I have to ask! SAVE OUR HERITAGE & RACE!
The only way we will ever be out of harms way is to annihilate the enemy till he is no longer a threat, All species expand themselves to the best of their ability. But with all due respect I still see some White guilt even if in traces within you, some tiny part of you cares about them, I don't. The black race wouldn't even exsist if not for us using them or trying to civilize them, they'd be just be in some history book! If nature's laws was followed they'd hv been weeded out long ago!
@StormReturns yea but the ppl or even other races are making it impossible to annihilate the real enemy khazars?!
now they have all other races attacking whites even when the europeans conquest was lead by khazars & white ppl & black both taken slaves by them to the new world/amer!
we have to educate the public since all races fall into same trap fighting the wrong sides instead of annihilating those who are evil and hypocrites!
khazars are segregating in isreal while calling 'antisemitism'?
So basicly you want to complain about those that are harming us but not hate those that do so, interesting! I believe we as the White race should do anything we can to survive, if we want to survive we need to start acting like it and stop half stepping and being scared of words they sling towards us. I give a fuck less what some enemy says, nor do I give a shit about if they survive or anything about them! Nature don't give us a right to live, we must earn it! I care about White's ONLY!
@Thesystemisantiwhite u dont have to mention white colonialism when there was conquest also occurring to 'whites' from the time of ancient sumeria!
its a fact that iranians r partly aryans/have had white ancestors and they dont entirely look 'arabic' but also have features of white race which concludes that they are mixed nation! this than further tells us that conquest/invasion occurred to white ppl by arabs and their expansion which is never taught in schools! also dont forget roman spain port
While you are at it, Google: (1) African only people who did not descend from Neanderthal. (2): First European Ancestors Were Cannibals . . . They ate their children,: No joke. In other words, it is time to end this useless mythical nonsense about *your* superiority. It is old, and ignorant. No one has a problem with you wanting to exalt and be with your kind. Have at it, you will never be missed. And also leave the stolen lands, and its resources to its rightful owners.
@seekingjustthefacts I hate it when people say "stolen lands". Conquered. We-white people- don't whine about when the Romans conquered our "lands" and imposed their culture and religions upon us. Thats the problem that I see. Everyone is blaming the other guy for their short-comings.
@seekingjustthefacts The resources belong to the Whites, so does that White man made computer, car, and brick home of yours.
You're black I take it? well unless you are living in a Mudhut, and eating a mudpie you are using another race's achievment.
Practiacally every land that whites colonized was inhabited with unevolved primates who hadn't even built a civilization or even chartered 3/4 of their land.
Man, if you were American, people would be calling you David Duke, or worse.
But you're wrong about the fundamental nature of humans. No, two wrongs don't make a right, but the majority of assholes who ever lived, couldn't give a hoot in hell about that, if the opportunity for payback becomes available. If it does, they'll take it, and then some.
Humans are THE top predator in all of Earths nature. We kill even at the bottom of the sea, and want blood over all else. History proves this is so.
The jews are the ones responsible for multiculturalism,political correctness and open border policies in Europe and America with the intent of flooding our countries with millions of third worlders and destroying the European race...
If a Nationalist/Fascistic revolution breaks out anywhere in the White World (Greece, Portugual, Russia, America - it doesn't matter), I'm going there to fight the scum, just like thousands of Brits joined the Spanish Foreign Legion in the Spanish Civil War!
@EuropeanWatchman We should all unite and destroy the jewish control over our governments in Europe and America.They have infiltrated the governments of UK,France,Germany e.t.c. The president of France Nikolas Sarkozy is jewish,the prime minister of UK David Cameron had a great great grandfather called Emile Levita who was a jewish banker.They control the west completely and hate the European race,that's why they are trying to wipe out the Europeans...
Yes I know. - And the fact that people go ballistic whenever one even uses the 'J' word is all the proof one needs of their absolute power.
The 'J's' are what? 0.2, MAYBE 0.5% of the Western World's population?... Yet look at their awesome power to practically criminalize anyone who is against them through their systematic infiltration of every institution of consequence, as if their take over of society were all planned out fromt he very beginning...
Just looking back at Hitler's everso prophetic speeches the comparison of what his regime described and what we actually see happening before us today, is palpable.
I didn't want to believe it at first - was afraid like everyone else in this culture conditioned, self-police state and like most people would bite the heads off of people deemed "anti-semetic",
but after I realized what Cultural Marxism & the Frankfurt School actually were and after reading Kevin MacDonald and then seeing the 'J's' themselves (such as the 'J' Barbara Spectre) actually admitting to it on camera, - there is no longer any denying what's clearly there controlling everything...
The J's are and clearly always were our gravest misfortune...
@DrHeinersSanatorium „Wo war Deutschland? In Weimar? In Berlin? Einmal war es an der Front, aber die Front zerfiel. War es beim Volk? Aber das schrie nach Brot und wählte seine dicken Bäuche. War es der Staat? Doch der Staat suchte geschwätzig seine Form und fand sie im Verzicht. Deutschland brannte dunkel in verwegenen Hirnen. Deutschland war da, wo um es gerungen wurde.“
What is an "ism"? Well,you first have a Nation,a large body of people.They make Rules to co-exist,and some laws too.Then they ALL agree to live by them.Now their Nation has an "ism",a belief system to live by.Indians had this too,The Five Nations,of the Continent,1000's of years in the making.Their Continent was RICH,there was enough for ALL,so MOST were kind and peaceful.Being Human"SOME" were very bad,and not liked by the many.These wanted Power,bad, but human too..Europeans came to TAKE.
After listening to his entire video I see that his brand of nationalist is definitely for a complete stratification of varying cultural societies. He made that clear. My problem with that is how much necessary uniformity is sacrifice if Society abandons the present model to pursue such a radical model. Thats a radical model and where is the moral arguments or moral justifications to go with it. I am trying to keep an open mind but it appears to be still the same 20th Century nationalism.
You are a very bright guy and this is actually a good video but isnt this sort of a "cake and eat it too" defining of Indigenous Communities unless you are counting immigration as an invasion. I struggle with defining immigration as an invasion but I realize there are those with more liberal definitions. I also struggle with the concept of immigrants colonizing Western Nations. Is that even possible? Even areas with large ethnic influx the dominant and controlling groups are always Eurodescen
@ThingsComeUp Yes, we need to be feared. You can guess my suggested solution to the jewish question. After this problem is solved, we (as Whites who ultimately don't fight each other) only have to be attentive to the far-eastern Asians. All the others are no threat to us.
Thesystemisantiwhite is a MAN! Sure is yet too well mannered and considerate -- but let's wait ten more years. Then he will be a ruthless chauvinist! I'm only half kidding.
@GottfriedFeder All manners and consideration go out the window when confronting those that seek our destruction. Consideration and mindfulness should be utilised when making an argument. I believe so, anyway.
In order for any kind of nationalism to move forward it must first gain credibility. I very much doubt it will be a revolution which gains power by force. It must, one day, win the vote of the people however brain-washed they are now.
When the impending big disaster comes that will blow open the locked door to the minds of Europeans, nationalists must intellectually prepare themselves to be the ones who put their foot in that door before it closes again or someone else will
The White race will never die! As long as the last White person draws breathe there is a chance to regain control of all Greater Europe together with all her resources and territories. (*Our* rightful and exclusive birthright.)
Regimes can change, hate can be passed down from generation to generation and kept alive for centuries and if and when necessary, *things* can be done...
@ThingsComeUp: Which is why your race is dying. You have yet to learn that for every life you take, you have already died. . . . "When you dig a grave for your imagined enemy . . . dig two." . . .-Lao Tzu
I am in my mid 20's and I already have two (blonde) children. One is two the other five. I can assure you that the race is not 'dead' in my household, that there will be more and that we are teaching all of our children to hate you with an intensity that will one day make even the Nuremburg parodies of WW2 look like an overglorified bun fight. :)
@EuropeanWatchman: You mean the paranoid schizophrenic, lunatic coward who murdered innocent Muslim teenagers at a summer camp, and others, because he could not genetically compete with them? What a "hero." For everyone he murdered, more Muslims will replace them 3 times more. What did he accomplished? Remember, you government has opened the borders and just signed the NDAA which is for esteemed-challenged, hoodlums like you. The FEMA camps are waiting. Keep it up.
@seekingjustthefacts Anders Breivik isn't one of us. He works for the secret societies and intelligence agencies. The devastation in Oslo was caused by many bombs in the buildings and the survivors of Utøya reported at least two shooters. It is said the expenses of Breivik were about one million euro. Which White nationalist has one million euro?
@EuropeanWatchman Congrats! Please make sure not to send your children to school. I have seen so many cases of children of nationalists who became anti-racists. School is not the same anymore than the one you experienced, anyway. It's gotten more insane.
We are homeschooling all of our children and are thinking about moving to a non-EU, non-NATO country (basically a country which isn't part of the Judeo-American Empire), such as Belarus or Russia. - Belarus is where my wife is originally from.
I had to find my partner elsewhere because of the ravages of Marxist-Feminism on the contemporary Western European populations.
@EuropeanWatchman I am inclined to think that the sooner western Europe sinks (irreversibly) into a multi-ethnic mire, the better chance there is of other white lands taking pro-active steps to ensure the survival of their own long-term racial integrity. Countries like the UK are passed the point of no return. It's now all about finding our place on this earth where some trace of european man can survive whilst the contemptible masses slowly perish. Harsh but inescapable realities.
@Thesystemisantiwhite Sorry but I'm just not of that mind-set any more. So long as we cling to hopelessly unrealistic goals we'll never advance our thinking on these issues. Britain without the white race means nothing to me, but the white race without Britain does mean something. Where loyalties are concerned race comes above all else, and I'm quite prepared to contemplate the sacrifice of my ethnic homeland for the long-term survival of the race.
@SmippeHyrst: Remember, you are genetically less stronger than these "contemptible races" whom you imagine will "slowly perish." Meaning, that if they go, so will you. Whatever kills them off, will kill you first. You are a minority on the planet by God's design. The first humans were created in Africa, Their DNA have withstood the onslaught of every western, bio-weapon and natural catastrophe known to humans, That too, by God's design.
@seekingjustthefacts If you are stupid enough to believe the Africans about the time of the initial migrations into Europe were the same as they are genetically today, your opinion means very little.
Was slavery God's design? African's have been at the heel of Arabs as well as Europeans, was that God's design? Africans in comparison to their European, Arab and Asian counterparts live in abject poverty, is that God's design?
@Thesystemisantiwhite Oh, and for the record, are you aware of how many African lives are contingent on the aid of Western nations, Western technology and Western medicinal exports?
@Thesystemisantiwhite:Let’s clear-up your confusion: GOD created the African first. They are the oldest humans on the planet by God’s design.MAN created injustice and genocide,by his own selfish arrogance & ego.The poverty that Africa is in today is MAN MADE,and are the same conditions that will befall you as the globalists rape and plunder Europe.Europeans are genetically least dominate of ALL groups.Any attempt to kill them off,will portend your extinction first. Got it?
@Thesystemisantiwhite: The genome of the Africans are millions of years old TODAY. They are genetically stronger than European genome TODAY. Their phenotype characteristics over the European is dominate TODAY. Any attempt to genocide them, will ultimately end in your own. Got it?
@seekingjustthefacts Excuse me? Which planet are you on? When did I call for an African genocide? When did I regard Africans as 'inferior'? Substantiate, or I'll block you for slander.
@seekingjustthefacts Africans have the same Alleles found in Gorillas and Chimpanzies, Africans are lesser distant from our Ape LPC.
A non-Political correct Biologist would argue that Africans are less evolved.
Europeans have more advanced Genes, a better developed immune system, and a higher IQ, this is why Blacks were enslaved by whites, and not the other way around. This is why Blacks lived in Mudhuts until the Europeans came and progressed them.
@Thesystemisantiwhite: When I say "them" I mean the indigenous peoples whom you regard as "inferior" but whom are genetically stronger and older than you on this planet,
@seekingjustthefacts So you're trying to support your claims by stating what God created, and yet you don't even believe in God. So essentially you're citing examples you don't believe in. Are you deliberately trying to lose this argument?
@seekingjustthefacts God created the African first? The oldest homo sapien bones are the Herto skulls from Ethiopia (160,000 years old) - and they were NOT of Negro ethnicity. They had probably ventured down into Africa via a land-bridge from Asia.
@ThingsComeUp: Yes. Your time is definitely up. Your extinction will be your own doing. No one destroys the Earth in the name of "exceptionalism," and think that Nature doesn't strike back. This will surely be the battle of your lives. . . brace yourselves.
Quite clearly the so-called "native Americans" WERE NOT indigenous to the Americas and quite clearly (from archaeological remains), the original "first peoples" almost everywhere (even Europe) happen to have been people whom today science would describe as "negroid," except in North America where the first peoples seem to have been caucasoid.
Today ice age creatures are reduced to Sub-Saharan Africa, just like the negroids who once populated almost every continent... Coincidence? I think not...
Just in case anyone else wants to start whinning on about extinct savages who routinely raided and murdered many thousands of European settlers in lands that were unused and unclaimed by anyone, as well as many hundreds of thousands of other savages, - many of whom were for a long time in fact ALLIES of several European powers and who mostly died out as a consequence of their own lack of immunity to European diseases, you may wish to visit this YouTube series here: /watch?v=NTt37IXrZBI
@EuropeanWatchman * You "bunch" hundreds of years of a History into simple categories,savages? NO, not in the beginning,later when they died of the mumps,and measles,and the white man showed he was here to conquer and TAKE,then they fought.If you have 1000 acres,and 900 are unused.Does that give some the right to take them? NO.Why do you have this "Savage" outlook?Did you read Sacaguwea?A Shosone,LED,Lewis and Clark.Your outlook is WRONG.The Nez Perce,out thought the U,S. savages? NO.
Hahahaha! Tell me which tribe "claimed" the land that Jamestown was built on and then tell me when they attempted to establish diplomatic ties with the English to make the claim respectable.
It's not the fault of English settlers if 1,000 stone age people claim 1,000,000 acres of wilderness, much of which they never actually use! Moreover, I don't even think that the Iraquoi or Algonquin even had a conception of state boundaries, therefore NOT proper Nations!
Indeed vast swathes of land were actually left to English, French and Dutch settlers by the natives of North America because they wanted to trade with them and they prospered as a result, eventually even forming military alliances with both Britain and France.
Indeed if one looks at how long modern European have actually been in America, about 80% of it is just Europeans and natives living side-by-side, often in alliance with one-another, indeed it was actually Imperial colonialism that was protecting the native Indians from the European colonists!
- Did Britain or France conquer and displace the Indians out of the Missippi basin? No! It was the United States and frankly from a progressive point of view this was inevitable and what's more native Indians were genociding each other for millenia way before modern Europeans ever arrived in great numbers!
@EuropeanWatchman *There was NO United States yet.Where do you get this dribble?Where did you find,: "They were genociding each other for millenia."?? GO ahead Mr.Mouth with NO REAL FACTS,other than his own mental retardation.Tell ME WHERE ? Well YOU can't,can YOU ?
Hahahaha! You are such a naive idiot! Where were you educated? Karl Marx Primary??? - Everyone KNOWS that human beings commit atrocities against each other, the hunter gathering humans of the Earth more so than any other group of humans, because the technological ratios are so less destructive! In hunter gatherer societies about 50% of all males are killed in war!
The genocide of women and children is ubiquitous and is a normal way of life for them!!
Didn't you know for example that even when the Whites fought against Indian tribes, other Indian tribes actually sided with the Whites against their Indian bretherin because of blood feuds? Are you really so stupid as believe that Cortez and his pirate band of about 60 men and three horses conquered the whole of the Aztec Empire themselves??
@EuropeanWatchman *YOUR another NET Tough guy,with a big fresh mouth.No Cortez and 60 men did little,BUT "The GERMS" that they carried,that they were immune to,DID.That is what killed the people.Yes SOME Indians had Feuds and did as you said,and also,MANY DID NOT.YOU take it upon yourself to say "what I think" then call me stupid,and answer,yourself??I say and think NONE of what YOU SAY.A tribe the"Tonka" were cannibals,true.But this does NOT make ALL Indian's cannibles,does it ? Some, were bad.
Oh I see, so 16th Century European seafarers were responsible for the Indians dying out because those seafarers weren't trained experts in 21st Century micro-biology and 21st Century epidemiology....................... :/
Sorry, but I kind of find it difficult to think of a single European society that routinely practiced cannibalism or the removal of thousands of peoples hearts for human sacrifice, even of those that existed before advent of Christiaity......
@EuropeanWatchman *Again,this is a habit with you.You CHANGE the question,..then answer yourself.Don't you read any history?I can see that you think that you know it all,but alas,you don't.But "to you",you do."trained experts in...."is ridiculous. An average person,with"the flu"or a"Cold" etc.Can go to a party and infect many others,not meaning to.Europeans eating hearts?Where are you?It "It seems that you are happy with YOUR mindset and wish to remain there." No point in talking to you,goodbye.
"YOU take it upon yourself to say "what I think" then call me stupid,and answer,yourself??I say and think NONE of what YOU SAY.A tribe the"Tonka" were cannibals,true.But this does NOT make ALL Indian's cannibles,does it ? Some, were bad."
Is not a proper question, it's an hysterical monologue.
@billy1212ist The Myans and Aztecs slaughtered Hundreds of other neighboring tribes such as the Mounds, the Myans and Aztecs would sacrifice people to their gods regularly, and literally ate their victims hearts.
Also let's not overlook the White American Indians who the Asiantics killed such as the Kennewick man, and the Solutreans who are belived to have been in America first.
A few waring tribes roaming a wilderness killing and eating each other is not a civilization.
@billy1212ist The American Indians are Not from America, but Asia. They migrated to America about 13,000 yrs ago. Many of them died due to the migration thus shrinking their numbers.
After thousands of yrs of wars with one another, by the time Europeans arrived for the second time the Indian population was very low, the Small pox did kill many but it was accidental, to think Europeans had control of their germs is insane, you might as well blame negroes for not containing AIDs.
Don't you know ANYTHING about the archaeology of the Americas which clearly represents genocidal Imperial cultures everywhere, such as the Maya, Anasazis, Aztecs, Zapotecs and Inca??? Didn't you even watch Mel Gibson's film 'Apocalypto?' - Which was made precisely to get rid of this insane fake greviance over things which essentially were no worse than what the supposed "victims" were already getting up to before the time of European conquest!
- And what about the CAUCASIANS who lived there BEFORE the time of European conquest? Weren't THEY genocided too??? Didn't THEY suffer genocide under the invading Asians crossing over from the Bearing Straights??? Therefore if you're going to aportion collective blame here, weren't the "native American" Indians of the 19th Century only suffering what THEY had already been dishing out to themselves and others for thousands of years???.....
The Third World colonization of the First World for ever greater profits in themselves is by no means "progressive" and can actually potentially lead to a new dark age, that would endanger all races.
I disagree with this. By your logic, you would be opposed to our ancestors' glorious endeavours to colonise & populate North America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada & all the other wonderful lands that benefited from White Expansion. Piffle. No, the problem our ancestors made is that they were not thorough enough in cleansing the lands of 'natives' and populating those areas with our best White stock. For this we can blame the poison of the mind that is 'chosen' brain pollution it all its forms.
@Thesystemisantiwhite Then you are opposed to the Golden Rule of White Racial Loyalty: what is good for the White Race. This is why 'nationalism' leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It is weak, hypocritical and ultimately useless.
@JimmyMacJones We are more than just our race. We belong to our folk. In the USA there may emerge a new national culture. But they don't get the point when they call their new culture The Whites. It's their nation. They need a new name. We Europeans know our nations. We aren't the same. We already have diversity within the White race.
Your ancestors did try to populate their stolen lands.However, they were never genetically strong enough to do so.Even Hitler could not, and you won't either.You are and have always been a minority on this Earth, by God's design. The Earth surly is benefiting from "White expansion"."You have succeed where no other people could. Namely, to completely and utterly destroy the Earth and its ecosystems. Now, that's spiritual harmony for you. Get over yourselves. We are all sick of it.
@seekingjustthefacts Previous colonial expansion does not justify white genocide. Period. Stop trying to justify your anti-white prejudices on theological grounds.
@seekingjustthefacts I prefer to use the term 'conquered lands' as opposed to 'stolen'. It cannot be 'stolen' if we never had a social contract with you people. Might is right, of course. And actually, we were - are - more than strong enough to populate all the worthwhile land of this world with White people exclusively. The greatest disaster of all time is not doing so.
Yes indeed. It annoys me when people whine on and on about how 'my ancestors came here as immigrants', whereis in fact they didn't! They came here as COLONISTS; there's a difference.
There is also a difference between racial colonization and Imperial colonization. Imperial colonization can be something good for the colonized AND colonizer. For example if some great alien civilization came to Earth and offered us wonders in exchange for submission, I would probably accept.
@EuropeanWatchman *You"see" things so you are right,or think that you are.I don't whine,I discus.Your Ancestors,intent was to Colonize,as they left their countries of Origin,and immigrated to a new country,they were both. See others speak English too.NYCin"part" not all,has racial colonization,Black hood,Rican hood,Italian hood,Irish hood,Indian(India) hood etc.Imperial Colonization can be Very BAD also,as in Red China.Or anywhere the people,don't like the Ones who Rule.Aliens? you already have.
The Persian occupation of the Levant for example was one example of how colonization can be mutually benevolent in its Imperial form, as with the 19th Century European occupation of parts of Asia and Africa, which brough things like law & order, the railway, sanitation, modern medicine, roads and efficient bureaucracy ect ect and which Asia and Africa have prospered immensely as a result of.
I really liked this video and the fact that it made things so clear, even though I still don't agree with nationalism.
However, could you explain what internationalism is in this case? I heard a nationalist say that internationalism, unlike cosmopolitanism, goes hand in hand with nationalism.
EmperorFishFinger 2 weeks ago
@EmperorFishFinger Well, as far as I'm concerned, internationalism is the absolute opposite of nationalism. I'm ill at the moment, and therefore do not trust my ability to present my take on internationalism. It's a good video topic for the future though, so I'll definitely approach this in the future.
Thanks for the comment, mate.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
Impressive ..
miiawh 2 weeks ago
Actually what you are promoting here, and doing well so, is ETHNOPLURALISM, not Nationalism. Thats why this Contradiction appeared. Nationalism is just the naked urge, to make your nation stronger. Ist very much linked with the modern Nationstate. It can occur under a) marxist, b)imperialist, or c)racist cirmcunstances, depending if you want to gain power and supremacy for your a)wordl revolution b)world governement c) race.
However only ethnopluralism implies the protection of peoples per se.
Btrachter 2 weeks ago
@Btrachter Ah, very interesting. I'll do some research on the topic. Thanks!
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite You are really intelligent, eloquent and fierce- . I appreciate your great work- and you are a obviously metalhead :D :D Thats the way i like it!!
Btrachter 2 weeks ago
No, mate...these things you've touched on are just a couple of aspects of Nationalism that you have linguistically garnished to appear as "fundamental tenets" that define the whole concept. Nice try. The whole paradigm of "race" and "nationhood" are a means of segregation (which, in turn, is a tool of oppression) and, as such, are a dangerous and corruptive force. There are no "races" - you and I are descendants of black ancestors - we are ALL brothers and sisters and the World is one nation.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 In which case, I'm sure you have no problem with colonialism, genocide and cultural imperialism. Nationalism is the only means whereby these things can be rejected.
Every ethnic group has the right to self autonomy.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite Ah...sure, that MUST be the logical conclusion, I don't think. "Rights" can be construed in many ways - but when they are used to support an argument that seeks to reverse and deny history (like ethnic nationalism) they become plastic and are blindly flung around as if they are natural law. Historically, England (and all other imperial powers) didn't give too much of a fuck about the "rights" of other countries...invade a country = recieve its immigrants. Get used to it.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 I do not seek to reverse or deny history.
I do not believe in natural law.
Historically they don't, correct, that doesn't mean they shouldn't in the future. Nor does it mean that these same rights should be denied to England. If you believe a whole nation shares collective guilt for a crime committed almost a hundred years ago, you're a racist. Period.
If a nation can, justly, possess collective guilt, it can also, equally justly, possess collective pride.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 And yes, the 'logical conclusion' of your 'one race' dogma is the non-existence of genocide. You can't kill that which doesn't exist.
In any case, Nationalism is not contingent on the biological cogency of race. Ethnicity is more than biology.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite Classifying England as an "Anglo-Saxon Country" is a fantasy - it's too late, baby (besides, it never was!) If everyone saw all people as one race, there'd be no Geno to cide...you just disproved your own argument while making absurd and baseless accusations - and that's never a good look. Ethnic purity is pure fallacy - and even if there was such a thing as a "pure line", the benefits of preserving one are non-existent or dubious at best. Science is on MY side.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 Oh dear, you've shot yourself in the foot.
Ethnic purity is irrelevant. However, the DNA of the indigenous English has been identified and is held by 70% of the population, as illustrated by the genealogical studies of Oxford Professor Bryan Sykes.
You're right, we aren't an anglo-saxon country - our genetic lineage is much deeper than the saxon migration.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite ...and what's this shit about not wanting an "ethnic nation" - you can't make a whole argument based on Nationalism and "anti-white racism" *snigger* and then accuse me of bringing up "shaky" arguments because I happen to mention Eugenics. "The holocaust was no genocide." Well, what was it, then? A church Fete? A Lamington Drive? You are the MASTER of the non-sequiter, mon frere! It's you who lives in Fantasy Land...ease up on the pomosity and beef-up your arguments.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 You are crazy.
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 I was being sarcastic. According to you, the holocaust can't be a genocide as there is no 'geno to cide'. I disagree. In order to recognise genocide, you must recognise ethnicity - or at least acknowledge its mutual recognition.
What happens to the 30%? Nothing. Why are you jumping to a 'happening'?
You haven't made any arguments, you're typing, yet managing to say nothing at the same time.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite The main reason I've sought to debate you is that you seem to vacillate quite a bit about what you actually want. It's hard to pin you down - Ethnic Nationalism is a mighty big firestick to be waving around, with many implications for many people...yet I sense that you think it involves just a minor adjustment. Whites are being victimised en masse? - bullshit. And, yes - the rise & fall of the Empire is bittersweet - you can't pick & choose the bits you want to swallow.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 This video isn't about what I want.
In fact, none of my videos are about 'what I want', other than for equal recognition of racist crimes against whites.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 '"anti-white racism" *snigger* '
So it's funny to you that whites are more likely to be killed on the basis of their ethnicity in this country than non-whites? That's 'snigger' worthy, to you? Yet you have the utter nerve to accuse me of exclusion!?
What a despicable human being you are.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite You only think I'm saying nothing because you don't like my arguments. I'll reiterate - Nationalism is already an emotive and complex issue...when you couple it with "race," it becomes explosive. My main problem with your argument is the glib way you gloss over the messy, unpleasant consequences of imposing arbitrary boundaries of race, in a context of real & constant flux, upon our common reality - one borne of a long history of migration and invasion.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 'My main problem with your argument is the glib way you gloss over the messy, unpleasant consequences of imposing arbitrary boundaries of race, in a context of real & constant flux, upon our common reality - one borne of a long history of migration and invasion. '
Now you've said something, and I do hold respect for postmodern critiques to this effect, and have thought on it deeply, and is the main reason I do not subscribe to a solely 'blood and soil' nationalism.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 'If everyone saw all people as one race, there'd be no Geno to cide'
You live in a fantasy land. The holocaust was no genocide. Nor was the Holodomor, or Sadame's treatment of Kurds - after all, where is the Geno!? If you honestly believe people will abandon their ethnic identity, you're delusional. The Soviet's tried this - off to the Gulag, my son!
'Ethnic purity is pure fallacy'
Never said it wasn't, and you bringing it up is evidence of your shaky terrain.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago 6
@Thesystemisantiwhite Who are you calling "son", mate? And "shaky terrain" - I'm not the one who thinks the "system" is "anti-white"! X0 The "system" IS white. Hey, man - enough with the accusations and emotive references to Gulag, or Genocide, or Dogma or "collective guilt" because you are WAY off the mark. It's typical right-wing manipulation and it just identifies you as a potential "straw man" to all reasonable readers of these comments. Oh, and it's Saddam - he wasn't French...
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@saxongreen78 I don't see all people as one race and so english law don't see because she treat the blacks as diferent ethnic group that the whites.
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite As for National Pride - what has anyone got to be "proud" of in just being born in a certain country? The acheivements of the Industrial Revolution, the English Language and the Empire weren't your achievements, or any other living Englishman's. You can feel GLAD to be British, glad to be in England - but pride and exclusion do no favours for anyone...particularly when the definition of England is being made smaller, less diverse. The World has changed - for the better.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 Nor does multiculturalism and exclusion.
You seem to arbitrarily match exclusion to the end of your statements. It's transparent.
Slavery wasn't any Englishman's, or my, achievement, nor was colonialism. So, also by your logic, I shouldn't reap the negative repercussions of this. You have a double standard.
Not only are you ignorant of the verifiable genetic mapping of the indigenous English, you also refuse to take your stance to its logical end.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite ...again, putting words in my mouth. You may THINK that just saying shit enough will make it so, but I'm here to tell you that you've got a long way to go if you seek to pull the wool over MY eyes. One minute you seem to be distancing yourself from your desire for ethnic nationhood based on racial purity, next you're spouting some guff about "indigenous English." Make your mind up. What happens to the other 30% of Britons who aren't "your kind"? Well? I'm listening.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 There only exist white britons.
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 Recognising an indigenous community has nothing to do with supposed ethnic purity.
You make some astounding leaps. I think you're prejudiced.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite See what I mean? Why even mention "genetic mapping" in your arguments when you don't even have the guts to own up to your obsession with race as a definitive factor of nationhood? Even your username is racially-charged...yet you seem to shy away from any possible negative connotations that may have. This flip-flopping and vacillation is infuriating to the reader and viewer alike. You either want racial segregation, or you don't...pick one, or forever hold your peace.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 No, it's 'infuriating' to you.
It's not a definitive factor. But it is one factor among many.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite The race is crucial factor for every ethnic group and every ethnic group need space to live in peace and have a future, so the invasion of such space form a multitude of foreigners is bad for the peace and future of a ethnic group.
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 'you've got a long way to go if you seek to pull the wool over MY eyes'
I don't seek to pull wool over anyone's eyes. I needn't do so. If anything, I seek to remove it! Let the light shine on the injustices of this racist episteme.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 Yes, the World has changed for the better, the english are in the way to became a minority in England. How can anyone say that this isn't for the better?
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
@SuperEnforcer88 Exactly. :-) No, I like English people...I just disagree with Nationalism.
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 Why you disagree with nationalism? Is because you don't believe that are diferent races? Well, according to the english laws there are such a thing.
SuperEnforcer88 2 weeks ago
just look at america when it was dominate white, it was always inventing new things and the country was proud.people around the world envied america,now we are a laughing stock and degraded morally .
2012fullmoon 3 weeks ago
A society organized according to the fundamental principles of Nationalism will represent a completely homogeneous structure, from a racial point of view, for the very idea of "nation" presupposes racial homogenity. The subjects inhabiting the territory will acquire citizenship and all the resulting rights that accompany it, not on the grounds of place of birth, but entirely on racial grounds. People will be encouraged to propagate by the introduction of special welfare-support programmes...
14Europa 3 weeks ago
"Nationalism is a political ideology that involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms, i.e. a nation. In the 'modernist' image of the nation, it is nationalism that creates national identity" - Wikipedia
z3r0Projects 3 weeks ago
@z3r0Projects I disagree with that definition as I disagree with the modernist conception of the nation. Nationalism predates Modernism. Consult Anthony Smith's 'Ethnic Origins of Nations'.
Thesystemisantiwhite 3 weeks ago
NATIONALISM = Hating people you never met and taking pride in achievements you had no part in (Doug Stanhope)
z3r0Projects 3 weeks ago
@z3r0Projects Nope, it's not that. Nationalism doesn't necessarily connote any form of 'pride'.
Thesystemisantiwhite 3 weeks ago
Nationalism is preserving our race, and improving our country.
stepheng1483 3 weeks ago
whats the name of the song at the end and who sings it?
bdsa1nts 3 weeks ago
A little message to English nationlists. If a liberal tells you that you cannot identify England as anglo-Saxon, as england is a nation of immigrants, your immediate reply should be 'Would you then not class Scotland, and Wales as Celtic Nations?" It dumbfounds them. Why? It is accepted in day-to-day society that these are Celtic nations. For them to say Yes, is Liberal Hypcrosy, as they can associate one british nation to a ethnic/cultural group but not another.
Use it, it works!
TemplarReturn 1 month ago
@TemplarReturn "Race" & "Nationalism" are divisive and arbitrary and stupid. Guess what? You, me and all whites are descendants of black Africans who walked into Europe thousands of years ago - we're all the same "race." Your alleged shutdown for liberals can be instantly turned into dogshit, as far as I can see. I would argue that NO nations can be ethnically-defined in 2012...how's that grab ya?
saxongreen78 2 weeks ago
@saxongreen78 I don't think you know the definition of 'race'.
Thesystemisantiwhite 2 weeks ago
Absolutely brilliant...keep it up.Your analysis and conclusions are some of the clearest thinking ive heard in a long long time
Gunnarsguns 1 month ago
how can you say a nationalist can be a nazi? the nazis believe that the nurdic race is superior and the only race capable of creating true culture worthy of the name and hence has the right to expend to lands of inferior races, use their resources and enslave them. according to the nazis some ethnic groups are so bad (jews gypsis) that they must be exterminated. but you said nationalists believe every ethnic group has the right to existence and self determination. so can you explain it to me?
goblinclaus 1 month ago
@goblinclaus I realised this contradiction after releasing the video.
Nationalism doesn't have to be tied with ideas of cultural relativism, though. But yes, I agree with you. I guess it depends largely on how you define National Socialism. There are, for example, black Nazis, Mongolian Nazis etc who don't hold such views regarding Aryan supremacy and the promotion of genocide, I'd assume many white Nazis would be similar, although I don't know.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
Awesome! I agree with everything you've said. Thank you for speaking out on behalf of indigenous Europeans and our right to existence.
goldfish09 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nationalism hence is a very wide set of ideologies,not a single one,from nazism,to patriotism.
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
Nationalism hence is a very wide set of ideologies,not a single one,from nazism,to patriotism.
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Europe before the development of patriotism/nationalism,people were generally loyal to a city/village(regionalism,the traceable/practical community,rather than the grand and abstract community)and/or to a particular leader(often a noble,many times with deep blood ties with nobles of other entities,even far away,and rather distinct ethnically in regard to the populations he ruled) rather than to their nation.
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
Comment removed
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
It can also include the belief that the state is of primary importance(unhistorical,unnatural/artificially acquired),or the belief that one state is naturally(this is light fascism,inhuman and unnatural/artificial)) superior to all other states.It is also used to describe a movement to establish or protect a 'homeland' (usually an autonomous state) for an ethnic group. In some cases the identification of a national culture is combined with a negative view of other "races" or cultures.
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
It can be a belief that citizenship in a state should be limited to one ethnic(unnatural,inhuman,unhistorical),cultural(old and legitimate patriotism),religious, or identity group, or that multinationality in a single state should necessarily comprise the right to express and exercise national identity even by minorities.
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
Nationalism is a political ideology that involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms, i.e. a nation. In the 'modernist' image of the nation,it is nationalism that creates national identity.
ViriathusVingathor 1 month ago
Good shit
tccjjss 1 month ago
Future nationalist leader; but you must cut your hair and put the suit on Brother ;o)
NationalistDefender 1 month ago
Why are whites so uptight? Y'all need to relax and quit taking yourselves so seriously.
tripnbilly77 1 month ago
Thankyou for defining Nationalism So now, hopefully, we wont have RACIST thrown in our Faces for being Nationalists--We now have a very clear, Lucid Description,,,& the LAST thing Nationalism is, is Racist!! Its MAD to even have to think we need to debate this!! BUT WE DO! Anti Racist=Anti-White...& Whites, as ANY other RACE has the right to their own identity/Country/Culture /Identity-Kids today Seemingly YEARN to be accepted by the blacks--WHY? As if I have to ask! SAVE OUR HERITAGE & RACE!
SHErocks1929 1 month ago
The only way we will ever be out of harms way is to annihilate the enemy till he is no longer a threat, All species expand themselves to the best of their ability. But with all due respect I still see some White guilt even if in traces within you, some tiny part of you cares about them, I don't. The black race wouldn't even exsist if not for us using them or trying to civilize them, they'd be just be in some history book! If nature's laws was followed they'd hv been weeded out long ago!
StormReturns 1 month ago
@StormReturns yea but the ppl or even other races are making it impossible to annihilate the real enemy khazars?!
now they have all other races attacking whites even when the europeans conquest was lead by khazars & white ppl & black both taken slaves by them to the new world/amer!
we have to educate the public since all races fall into same trap fighting the wrong sides instead of annihilating those who are evil and hypocrites!
khazars are segregating in isreal while calling 'antisemitism'?
apocalypse080 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So basicly you want to complain about those that are harming us but not hate those that do so, interesting! I believe we as the White race should do anything we can to survive, if we want to survive we need to start acting like it and stop half stepping and being scared of words they sling towards us. I give a fuck less what some enemy says, nor do I give a shit about if they survive or anything about them! Nature don't give us a right to live, we must earn it! I care about White's ONLY!
StormReturns 1 month ago
Comment removed
StormReturns 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite u dont have to mention white colonialism when there was conquest also occurring to 'whites' from the time of ancient sumeria!
its a fact that iranians r partly aryans/have had white ancestors and they dont entirely look 'arabic' but also have features of white race which concludes that they are mixed nation! this than further tells us that conquest/invasion occurred to white ppl by arabs and their expansion which is never taught in schools! also dont forget roman spain port
apocalypse080 1 month ago 2
My God, it's just like trying to explain 'atheism' to religious fuck-tards!
Tsicar 1 month ago in playlist More videos from Thesystemisantiwhite 2
You're the best thing thats happened to youtube, in terms of a voice for nationalism.
UnyieldingDefiance 1 month ago 19
Universal-Nationalism ;)
donaropa 1 month ago
Brilliant vid...
jelluzzfan 1 month ago
Well put. Especially well-expressed from around 05:36 to 07:09.
Nationalism is ethno-cultural independence. 'Loyalty to one's own & fairness for all'.
ProNorden 1 month ago
Thanks for fighting against the Genocide of our people!
Anti-Racist is just an excuse for Anti-White
white geNOcide
4MyNation 1 month ago 2
Do you know what,"Logically thinking Irrationally" is ? Watch this fool and see.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
While you are at it, Google: (1) African only people who did not descend from Neanderthal. (2): First European Ancestors Were Cannibals . . . They ate their children,: No joke. In other words, it is time to end this useless mythical nonsense about *your* superiority. It is old, and ignorant. No one has a problem with you wanting to exalt and be with your kind. Have at it, you will never be missed. And also leave the stolen lands, and its resources to its rightful owners.
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts If you have no problem with me wanting to be with my own kind, why are you posting here? We're in agreement. End.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago 11
@seekingjustthefacts I hate it when people say "stolen lands". Conquered. We-white people- don't whine about when the Romans conquered our "lands" and imposed their culture and religions upon us. Thats the problem that I see. Everyone is blaming the other guy for their short-comings.
Hlejames 1 month ago 2
@seekingjustthefacts The resources belong to the Whites, so does that White man made computer, car, and brick home of yours.
You're black I take it? well unless you are living in a Mudhut, and eating a mudpie you are using another race's achievment.
Practiacally every land that whites colonized was inhabited with unevolved primates who hadn't even built a civilization or even chartered 3/4 of their land.
lakewood425 1 month ago
I love you
RideoftheValkyr 1 month ago
All Israeli Jews are nationalist, so when Whites want a nation we're just asking for the same thing enjoyed by Jews and others.
ZnOZincOxide 1 month ago
"Racism" is a made-up social construct that didn't even come into the English Dictionary until 1971 and doesn't really mean anything.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
Man, if you were American, people would be calling you David Duke, or worse.
But you're wrong about the fundamental nature of humans. No, two wrongs don't make a right, but the majority of assholes who ever lived, couldn't give a hoot in hell about that, if the opportunity for payback becomes available. If it does, they'll take it, and then some.
Humans are THE top predator in all of Earths nature. We kill even at the bottom of the sea, and want blood over all else. History proves this is so.
MachOverspeedsPlace 1 month ago
The jews are the ones responsible for multiculturalism,political correctness and open border policies in Europe and America with the intent of flooding our countries with millions of third worlders and destroying the European race...
george564as 1 month ago 2
If a Nationalist/Fascistic revolution breaks out anywhere in the White World (Greece, Portugual, Russia, America - it doesn't matter), I'm going there to fight the scum, just like thousands of Brits joined the Spanish Foreign Legion in the Spanish Civil War!
WHO'S WITH ME?!!!...
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman We should all unite and destroy the jewish control over our governments in Europe and America.They have infiltrated the governments of UK,France,Germany e.t.c. The president of France Nikolas Sarkozy is jewish,the prime minister of UK David Cameron had a great great grandfather called Emile Levita who was a jewish banker.They control the west completely and hate the European race,that's why they are trying to wipe out the Europeans...
george564as 1 month ago
@george564as
Yes I know. - And the fact that people go ballistic whenever one even uses the 'J' word is all the proof one needs of their absolute power.
The 'J's' are what? 0.2, MAYBE 0.5% of the Western World's population?... Yet look at their awesome power to practically criminalize anyone who is against them through their systematic infiltration of every institution of consequence, as if their take over of society were all planned out fromt he very beginning...
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@george564as
Just looking back at Hitler's everso prophetic speeches the comparison of what his regime described and what we actually see happening before us today, is palpable.
I didn't want to believe it at first - was afraid like everyone else in this culture conditioned, self-police state and like most people would bite the heads off of people deemed "anti-semetic",
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@george564as
but after I realized what Cultural Marxism & the Frankfurt School actually were and after reading Kevin MacDonald and then seeing the 'J's' themselves (such as the 'J' Barbara Spectre) actually admitting to it on camera, - there is no longer any denying what's clearly there controlling everything...
The J's are and clearly always were our gravest misfortune...
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
nationalists of the world - unite!
zragisha 1 month ago
@DrHeinersSanatorium Srbija je tamo gde su su srbi (Serbien ist da wo die Serben sind) - Slobodan Milosevic
zragisha 1 month ago
@DrHeinersSanatorium „Wo war Deutschland? In Weimar? In Berlin? Einmal war es an der Front, aber die Front zerfiel. War es beim Volk? Aber das schrie nach Brot und wählte seine dicken Bäuche. War es der Staat? Doch der Staat suchte geschwätzig seine Form und fand sie im Verzicht. Deutschland brannte dunkel in verwegenen Hirnen. Deutschland war da, wo um es gerungen wurde.“
– Ernst von Salomon
GottfriedFeder 1 month ago
What is an "ism"? Well,you first have a Nation,a large body of people.They make Rules to co-exist,and some laws too.Then they ALL agree to live by them.Now their Nation has an "ism",a belief system to live by.Indians had this too,The Five Nations,of the Continent,1000's of years in the making.Their Continent was RICH,there was enough for ALL,so MOST were kind and peaceful.Being Human"SOME" were very bad,and not liked by the many.These wanted Power,bad, but human too..Europeans came to TAKE.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
After listening to his entire video I see that his brand of nationalist is definitely for a complete stratification of varying cultural societies. He made that clear. My problem with that is how much necessary uniformity is sacrifice if Society abandons the present model to pursue such a radical model. Thats a radical model and where is the moral arguments or moral justifications to go with it. I am trying to keep an open mind but it appears to be still the same 20th Century nationalism.
BonusCivis 1 month ago
You are a very bright guy and this is actually a good video but isnt this sort of a "cake and eat it too" defining of Indigenous Communities unless you are counting immigration as an invasion. I struggle with defining immigration as an invasion but I realize there are those with more liberal definitions. I also struggle with the concept of immigrants colonizing Western Nations. Is that even possible? Even areas with large ethnic influx the dominant and controlling groups are always Eurodescen
BonusCivis 1 month ago
Great video. America is a white Christian nation.
TheAmericanDefender 1 month ago
@ThingsComeUp Yes, we need to be feared. You can guess my suggested solution to the jewish question. After this problem is solved, we (as Whites who ultimately don't fight each other) only have to be attentive to the far-eastern Asians. All the others are no threat to us.
Thesystemisantiwhite is a MAN! Sure is yet too well mannered and considerate -- but let's wait ten more years. Then he will be a ruthless chauvinist! I'm only half kidding.
GottfriedFeder 1 month ago
@GottfriedFeder All manners and consideration go out the window when confronting those that seek our destruction. Consideration and mindfulness should be utilised when making an argument. I believe so, anyway.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@GottfriedFeder
In order for any kind of nationalism to move forward it must first gain credibility. I very much doubt it will be a revolution which gains power by force. It must, one day, win the vote of the people however brain-washed they are now.
When the impending big disaster comes that will blow open the locked door to the minds of Europeans, nationalists must intellectually prepare themselves to be the ones who put their foot in that door before it closes again or someone else will
RoyalistNationalist 1 month ago
The White race will never die! As long as the last White person draws breathe there is a chance to regain control of all Greater Europe together with all her resources and territories. (*Our* rightful and exclusive birthright.)
Regimes can change, hate can be passed down from generation to generation and kept alive for centuries and if and when necessary, *things* can be done...
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@ThingsComeUp: Which is why your race is dying. You have yet to learn that for every life you take, you have already died. . . . "When you dig a grave for your imagined enemy . . . dig two." . . .-Lao Tzu
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts
I am in my mid 20's and I already have two (blonde) children. One is two the other five. I can assure you that the race is not 'dead' in my household, that there will be more and that we are teaching all of our children to hate you with an intensity that will one day make even the Nuremburg parodies of WW2 look like an overglorified bun fight. :)
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman: LOL!
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts
Glad I can be of some amusement to you.
Tell me, did you find Anders Breivik funny as well?
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman: You mean the paranoid schizophrenic, lunatic coward who murdered innocent Muslim teenagers at a summer camp, and others, because he could not genetically compete with them? What a "hero." For everyone he murdered, more Muslims will replace them 3 times more. What did he accomplished? Remember, you government has opened the borders and just signed the NDAA which is for esteemed-challenged, hoodlums like you. The FEMA camps are waiting. Keep it up.
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts Anders Breivik isn't one of us. He works for the secret societies and intelligence agencies. The devastation in Oslo was caused by many bombs in the buildings and the survivors of Utøya reported at least two shooters. It is said the expenses of Breivik were about one million euro. Which White nationalist has one million euro?
GottfriedFeder 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman Congrats! Please make sure not to send your children to school. I have seen so many cases of children of nationalists who became anti-racists. School is not the same anymore than the one you experienced, anyway. It's gotten more insane.
GottfriedFeder 1 month ago
@GottfriedFeder
We are homeschooling all of our children and are thinking about moving to a non-EU, non-NATO country (basically a country which isn't part of the Judeo-American Empire), such as Belarus or Russia. - Belarus is where my wife is originally from.
I had to find my partner elsewhere because of the ravages of Marxist-Feminism on the contemporary Western European populations.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman I am inclined to think that the sooner western Europe sinks (irreversibly) into a multi-ethnic mire, the better chance there is of other white lands taking pro-active steps to ensure the survival of their own long-term racial integrity. Countries like the UK are passed the point of no return. It's now all about finding our place on this earth where some trace of european man can survive whilst the contemptible masses slowly perish. Harsh but inescapable realities.
SmippeHyrst 1 month ago
@SmippeHyrst I agree with you. But we must prove ourselves wrong, and not let it be so!
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite Sorry but I'm just not of that mind-set any more. So long as we cling to hopelessly unrealistic goals we'll never advance our thinking on these issues. Britain without the white race means nothing to me, but the white race without Britain does mean something. Where loyalties are concerned race comes above all else, and I'm quite prepared to contemplate the sacrifice of my ethnic homeland for the long-term survival of the race.
SmippeHyrst 1 month ago
Comment removed
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SmippeHyrst: Remember, you are genetically less stronger than these "contemptible races" whom you imagine will "slowly perish." Meaning, that if they go, so will you. Whatever kills them off, will kill you first. You are a minority on the planet by God's design. The first humans were created in Africa, Their DNA have withstood the onslaught of every western, bio-weapon and natural catastrophe known to humans, That too, by God's design.
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts If you are stupid enough to believe the Africans about the time of the initial migrations into Europe were the same as they are genetically today, your opinion means very little.
Was slavery God's design? African's have been at the heel of Arabs as well as Europeans, was that God's design? Africans in comparison to their European, Arab and Asian counterparts live in abject poverty, is that God's design?
Stop using theology to justify your hatred.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite Oh, and for the record, are you aware of how many African lives are contingent on the aid of Western nations, Western technology and Western medicinal exports?
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite:Let’s clear-up your confusion: GOD created the African first. They are the oldest humans on the planet by God’s design.MAN created injustice and genocide,by his own selfish arrogance & ego.The poverty that Africa is in today is MAN MADE,and are the same conditions that will befall you as the globalists rape and plunder Europe.Europeans are genetically least dominate of ALL groups.Any attempt to kill them off,will portend your extinction first. Got it?
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts The 'Africans' the Europeans descended from are not the same genetically as the Africans of today... Got it?
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite: The genome of the Africans are millions of years old TODAY. They are genetically stronger than European genome TODAY. Their phenotype characteristics over the European is dominate TODAY. Any attempt to genocide them, will ultimately end in your own. Got it?
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts Excuse me? Which planet are you on? When did I call for an African genocide? When did I regard Africans as 'inferior'? Substantiate, or I'll block you for slander.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts Africans have the same Alleles found in Gorillas and Chimpanzies, Africans are lesser distant from our Ape LPC.
A non-Political correct Biologist would argue that Africans are less evolved.
Europeans have more advanced Genes, a better developed immune system, and a higher IQ, this is why Blacks were enslaved by whites, and not the other way around. This is why Blacks lived in Mudhuts until the Europeans came and progressed them.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite: When I say "them" I mean the indigenous peoples whom you regard as "inferior" but whom are genetically stronger and older than you on this planet,
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts What? When did I say I regard them as inferior?
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts You should change your name to seekingtoreintrpretthefacts, but unfortunately YT only allows 20 characters.
DreamofBoadicea 1 month ago
@DreamofBoadicea Oops... "seekingtoreinterpretthefacts", but that's one more character.
DreamofBoadicea 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts So you're trying to support your claims by stating what God created, and yet you don't even believe in God. So essentially you're citing examples you don't believe in. Are you deliberately trying to lose this argument?
DreamofBoadicea 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts God created the African first? The oldest homo sapien bones are the Herto skulls from Ethiopia (160,000 years old) - and they were NOT of Negro ethnicity. They had probably ventured down into Africa via a land-bridge from Asia.
SmippeHyrst 1 month ago
@ThingsComeUp: Yes. Your time is definitely up. Your extinction will be your own doing. No one destroys the Earth in the name of "exceptionalism," and think that Nature doesn't strike back. This will surely be the battle of your lives. . . brace yourselves.
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
Quite clearly the so-called "native Americans" WERE NOT indigenous to the Americas and quite clearly (from archaeological remains), the original "first peoples" almost everywhere (even Europe) happen to have been people whom today science would describe as "negroid," except in North America where the first peoples seem to have been caucasoid.
Today ice age creatures are reduced to Sub-Saharan Africa, just like the negroids who once populated almost every continent... Coincidence? I think not...
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@ThingsComeUp And what should we few activists do? We need an army. So it's the time for recruting.
GottfriedFeder 1 month ago
Just in case anyone else wants to start whinning on about extinct savages who routinely raided and murdered many thousands of European settlers in lands that were unused and unclaimed by anyone, as well as many hundreds of thousands of other savages, - many of whom were for a long time in fact ALLIES of several European powers and who mostly died out as a consequence of their own lack of immunity to European diseases, you may wish to visit this YouTube series here: /watch?v=NTt37IXrZBI
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman * You "bunch" hundreds of years of a History into simple categories,savages? NO, not in the beginning,later when they died of the mumps,and measles,and the white man showed he was here to conquer and TAKE,then they fought.If you have 1000 acres,and 900 are unused.Does that give some the right to take them? NO.Why do you have this "Savage" outlook?Did you read Sacaguwea?A Shosone,LED,Lewis and Clark.Your outlook is WRONG.The Nez Perce,out thought the U,S. savages? NO.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Hahahaha! Tell me which tribe "claimed" the land that Jamestown was built on and then tell me when they attempted to establish diplomatic ties with the English to make the claim respectable.
It's not the fault of English settlers if 1,000 stone age people claim 1,000,000 acres of wilderness, much of which they never actually use! Moreover, I don't even think that the Iraquoi or Algonquin even had a conception of state boundaries, therefore NOT proper Nations!
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Indeed vast swathes of land were actually left to English, French and Dutch settlers by the natives of North America because they wanted to trade with them and they prospered as a result, eventually even forming military alliances with both Britain and France.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Indeed if one looks at how long modern European have actually been in America, about 80% of it is just Europeans and natives living side-by-side, often in alliance with one-another, indeed it was actually Imperial colonialism that was protecting the native Indians from the European colonists!
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
- Did Britain or France conquer and displace the Indians out of the Missippi basin? No! It was the United States and frankly from a progressive point of view this was inevitable and what's more native Indians were genociding each other for millenia way before modern Europeans ever arrived in great numbers!
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman *There was NO United States yet.Where do you get this dribble?Where did you find,: "They were genociding each other for millenia."?? GO ahead Mr.Mouth with NO REAL FACTS,other than his own mental retardation.Tell ME WHERE ? Well YOU can't,can YOU ?
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Hahahaha! You are such a naive idiot! Where were you educated? Karl Marx Primary??? - Everyone KNOWS that human beings commit atrocities against each other, the hunter gathering humans of the Earth more so than any other group of humans, because the technological ratios are so less destructive! In hunter gatherer societies about 50% of all males are killed in war!
The genocide of women and children is ubiquitous and is a normal way of life for them!!
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Didn't you know for example that even when the Whites fought against Indian tribes, other Indian tribes actually sided with the Whites against their Indian bretherin because of blood feuds? Are you really so stupid as believe that Cortez and his pirate band of about 60 men and three horses conquered the whole of the Aztec Empire themselves??
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman *YOUR another NET Tough guy,with a big fresh mouth.No Cortez and 60 men did little,BUT "The GERMS" that they carried,that they were immune to,DID.That is what killed the people.Yes SOME Indians had Feuds and did as you said,and also,MANY DID NOT.YOU take it upon yourself to say "what I think" then call me stupid,and answer,yourself??I say and think NONE of what YOU SAY.A tribe the"Tonka" were cannibals,true.But this does NOT make ALL Indian's cannibles,does it ? Some, were bad.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Oh I see, so 16th Century European seafarers were responsible for the Indians dying out because those seafarers weren't trained experts in 21st Century micro-biology and 21st Century epidemiology....................... :/
Sorry, but I kind of find it difficult to think of a single European society that routinely practiced cannibalism or the removal of thousands of peoples hearts for human sacrifice, even of those that existed before advent of Christiaity......
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman *Again,this is a habit with you.You CHANGE the question,..then answer yourself.Don't you read any history?I can see that you think that you know it all,but alas,you don't.But "to you",you do."trained experts in...."is ridiculous. An average person,with"the flu"or a"Cold" etc.Can go to a party and infect many others,not meaning to.Europeans eating hearts?Where are you?It "It seems that you are happy with YOUR mindset and wish to remain there." No point in talking to you,goodbye.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
"YOU take it upon yourself to say "what I think" then call me stupid,and answer,yourself??I say and think NONE of what YOU SAY.A tribe the"Tonka" were cannibals,true.But this does NOT make ALL Indian's cannibles,does it ? Some, were bad."
Is not a proper question, it's an hysterical monologue.
If you have a proper question to ask then ask it.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist The Myans and Aztecs slaughtered Hundreds of other neighboring tribes such as the Mounds, the Myans and Aztecs would sacrifice people to their gods regularly, and literally ate their victims hearts.
Also let's not overlook the White American Indians who the Asiantics killed such as the Kennewick man, and the Solutreans who are belived to have been in America first.
A few waring tribes roaming a wilderness killing and eating each other is not a civilization.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@billy1212ist The American Indians are Not from America, but Asia. They migrated to America about 13,000 yrs ago. Many of them died due to the migration thus shrinking their numbers.
After thousands of yrs of wars with one another, by the time Europeans arrived for the second time the Indian population was very low, the Small pox did kill many but it was accidental, to think Europeans had control of their germs is insane, you might as well blame negroes for not containing AIDs.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
Don't you know ANYTHING about the archaeology of the Americas which clearly represents genocidal Imperial cultures everywhere, such as the Maya, Anasazis, Aztecs, Zapotecs and Inca??? Didn't you even watch Mel Gibson's film 'Apocalypto?' - Which was made precisely to get rid of this insane fake greviance over things which essentially were no worse than what the supposed "victims" were already getting up to before the time of European conquest!
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
- And what about the CAUCASIANS who lived there BEFORE the time of European conquest? Weren't THEY genocided too??? Didn't THEY suffer genocide under the invading Asians crossing over from the Bearing Straights??? Therefore if you're going to aportion collective blame here, weren't the "native American" Indians of the 19th Century only suffering what THEY had already been dishing out to themselves and others for thousands of years???.....
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
I don't have time to write you out a full dissertation, so watch this.
/watch?v=pj-hqDFX-Ug
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@billy1212ist
The Third World colonization of the First World for ever greater profits in themselves is by no means "progressive" and can actually potentially lead to a new dark age, that would endanger all races.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
I disagree with this. By your logic, you would be opposed to our ancestors' glorious endeavours to colonise & populate North America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada & all the other wonderful lands that benefited from White Expansion. Piffle. No, the problem our ancestors made is that they were not thorough enough in cleansing the lands of 'natives' and populating those areas with our best White stock. For this we can blame the poison of the mind that is 'chosen' brain pollution it all its forms.
JimmyMacJones 1 month ago
@JimmyMacJones I am opposed to what you have outlined above.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@Thesystemisantiwhite Then you are opposed to the Golden Rule of White Racial Loyalty: what is good for the White Race. This is why 'nationalism' leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It is weak, hypocritical and ultimately useless.
JimmyMacJones 1 month ago
@JimmyMacJones We are more than just our race. We belong to our folk. In the USA there may emerge a new national culture. But they don't get the point when they call their new culture The Whites. It's their nation. They need a new name. We Europeans know our nations. We aren't the same. We already have diversity within the White race.
GottfriedFeder 1 month ago
@GottfriedFeder You are contradicting yourself. And I completely disagree with you of course. Your attitude is divisive and non-productive.
JimmyMacJones 1 month ago
Your ancestors did try to populate their stolen lands.However, they were never genetically strong enough to do so.Even Hitler could not, and you won't either.You are and have always been a minority on this Earth, by God's design. The Earth surly is benefiting from "White expansion"."You have succeed where no other people could. Namely, to completely and utterly destroy the Earth and its ecosystems. Now, that's spiritual harmony for you. Get over yourselves. We are all sick of it.
seekingjustthefacts 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts Previous colonial expansion does not justify white genocide. Period. Stop trying to justify your anti-white prejudices on theological grounds.
Thesystemisantiwhite 1 month ago
@seekingjustthefacts I prefer to use the term 'conquered lands' as opposed to 'stolen'. It cannot be 'stolen' if we never had a social contract with you people. Might is right, of course. And actually, we were - are - more than strong enough to populate all the worthwhile land of this world with White people exclusively. The greatest disaster of all time is not doing so.
JimmyMacJones 1 month ago
@JimmyMacJones
Yes indeed. It annoys me when people whine on and on about how 'my ancestors came here as immigrants', whereis in fact they didn't! They came here as COLONISTS; there's a difference.
There is also a difference between racial colonization and Imperial colonization. Imperial colonization can be something good for the colonized AND colonizer. For example if some great alien civilization came to Earth and offered us wonders in exchange for submission, I would probably accept.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman *You"see" things so you are right,or think that you are.I don't whine,I discus.Your Ancestors,intent was to Colonize,as they left their countries of Origin,and immigrated to a new country,they were both. See others speak English too.NYCin"part" not all,has racial colonization,Black hood,Rican hood,Italian hood,Irish hood,Indian(India) hood etc.Imperial Colonization can be Very BAD also,as in Red China.Or anywhere the people,don't like the Ones who Rule.Aliens? you already have.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@JimmyMacJones
The Persian occupation of the Levant for example was one example of how colonization can be mutually benevolent in its Imperial form, as with the 19th Century European occupation of parts of Asia and Africa, which brough things like law & order, the railway, sanitation, modern medicine, roads and efficient bureaucracy ect ect and which Asia and Africa have prospered immensely as a result of.
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@JimmyMacJones: Your delusional preferences doesn't negate historical facts.After 2000 years, you are still a m