@Chirag1496 I'm not sure, but I do know that these reactions are typically more complicated down at the subatomic particle level than is typically conveyed in the simple equations that just state the start and end products. There may be more than one way for that particular reaction to unfold. Just guessing at the moment, though.
This is the most amazing series I have seen. I know all about necleus, atoms, and electromagnetic decay. Thanks, Derek, you need to post more, maybe noise, pH levels, etc.
Sir, why there is a variety of Mass numbers given for the products after the fission reaction? One book says - Krypton : 94 , Barium 139
Wikipedia says : Krypton 92 , Barium 141... ?
Chirag1496 6 months ago
@Chirag1496 I'm not sure, but I do know that these reactions are typically more complicated down at the subatomic particle level than is typically conveyed in the simple equations that just state the start and end products. There may be more than one way for that particular reaction to unfold. Just guessing at the moment, though.
derekowens 6 months ago
from where does neutron came can anyone tell me please
TheDevilvivek 7 months ago in playlist nuclear science derek owens
@TheDevilvivek Correction: "From where does it come?" You're thinking of "(from) whence it came."
LokiClock 7 months ago
YouTube's best tutorial vids on the subject = 7.5a & 7.5b - thanks a whole lot
dracd235 8 months ago in playlist Manhattan Project
lisa meitner was austrian; not german :)
missmolly77777770 11 months ago
@missmolly77777770 Thanks, miss Molly! I'll put that on my list of things to fix...
DO
derekowens 11 months ago
Bravo! This video has been very helpful to me as a teacher, trying to branch into nuclear chemistry to a small curious 7th grade class!
ladylaurenmo 1 year ago
that was great - I only have one critique - Rutherford did that in 1890 though, not 1990 - he died in 1937 ...
kateclaudia 1 year ago
@kateclaudia Whoops! Did I say 1990? Definitely my mistake. 1890 would be correct rather than 1990. Thanks.
derekowens 1 year ago
@derekowens no you said 1919 not 1990
Aniihya 1 year ago
@Aniihya Yes, thanks. Just looked it up again. 1919 is correct. Thanks.
derekowens 1 year ago
@kateclaudia douchbag he said 1919 cunt nugget
olivier12125 11 months ago
@olivier12125: Yes my mistake I am afraid I misheard him :) Sorry about that derekowens I didn't mean to be rude. Thanks mate.
kateclaudia 11 months ago
The best explanation of the nuclear fission I´ve ever seen in textbooks and the Internet. Thank you, greetings from Russia.
rugalevv 1 year ago
Thnx :)
xgoldensunshinex 2 years ago
Your explanations beat all teachers!
I understood straight away, thanks.
Ninjax111 2 years ago
This is the most amazing series I have seen. I know all about necleus, atoms, and electromagnetic decay. Thanks, Derek, you need to post more, maybe noise, pH levels, etc.
Thanks again, you're the best
absbgirl 2 years ago
In the formula below that resumes the fission reaction,the mass numbers of Krypton and barium shoulde be 55 and 86 respectively.
8121950 3 years ago
isn't the mass number the total amount of neutrons+protons? 55+36=91 and 56+86=142, just like he wrote there.
you can only get the number of neutrons (55 and 86) by subtracting the atomic number from the mass number.
DeJayHank 2 years ago
Great Video, thanks!
ScienceScott 3 years ago