Added: 2 years ago
From: BBCWorldwide
Views: 6,743
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lucy must be one of the ancient alien visit the earth 3.2 million year ago.

  • What about a kangeroo?

  • "Almost the same time of Lucy"

  • Birds have walked on 2 legs for ages.

  • @Stiebon he said mammals

  • @Stiebon birds aren't mammals, they're birds :L

  • @Stiebon but there not mammals

  • Thats a joke....they don't know who made those tracks..lol

  • @smoothpeople33 You don't make sense...What are u getting at.??

  • @mykegoh at 2:35 they say that they found foot prints from lucy...

    1. They don't know who made those prints.

    2. They know they are 3.6 million years old based on what they believe.

    3. Those are very faded tracks... definitely not clear evidence.

    I get tired of hearing about things science knows. Many times when you lay all the facts out its based on what they believe to be true. I Would like to not see such heavy brain washing in media and schools.

  • @smoothpeople33 See what happens when u believed in a sky daddy.?? It refers to lucy's species, the bipedal species. Do you know what is bipedal???

    Do you even know what this vid is about.?.The tile says"DID HUMANS WALK THE EARTH 3.2 millions yrs ago". Its an investigation into the time line of bipedalism.

    Go ahead and study more of your sky daddy's doctrine and this is the result.

  • @mykegoh attacks on my beliefs dont validate yours. A skeleton in the ground isn't proven to have left tracks anywere, had offspring, or evolved into anything.

    Belief in a sky daddy, mommy, or a magic mud

    My point is its all belief. Belief isn't science its religion. Science is testable, provable, and repeatable Sadly I bought the official story hook line and sinker before I was ever introduced to the big sky daddy. I would have liked to learn both early instead of paying for brainwashing

  • @smoothpeople33 Ya see if u can test ur birth in the lab to prove ur mother really gave birth to you then talk. Do more research before making a statement.

  • @mykegoh I rely on witness, plus im here...lol Its not a matter of research. My point was those tracks didn't leave a name tag. The tracks could have been a different bipedal animal. Finding tracks in the mud doesn't mean I made them just because I live there. I love science and religion....I am not afraid to admit the people only know some things such as your mother birthed you and she was as much human as you...that will always go unbroken. Evolution from one animal to another is belief

  • @smoothpeople33 So you rely on witness...witness(human by words) can lie that's why paternal DNA is the a more reliable mean and its a lab test.

    As i said u did not get what the vid was about. It's about bipedalism. Get it into ur head and the vid is saying the tracks were made by lucy's species not specifically saying lucy did that but lucy's species.

    .... Evolution from one animal to another is belief......

    Again u made n ignorant statement. Research n read more b4 going further

  • @mykegoh Here is what lab tests say about humans...all the people tested are 99.9% similar.  The reason for this is that dna is like a digital signal...It comes in specific tones. It dosent' come as variants the codes are clearly defined, not a blurry evolving mix. Regardless on how you want to view your evidence it gets down to belief when you fit all the facts together. Here is some advice...get your head off the research and look around with your own eyes animals nothing is evolving.

  • @smoothpeople33 ..Here is some advice..get your head off the research and look around with your own eyes animals nothing is evolving..

    This advice makes ppl go BACKWARDS n tht's wht u n religion r encouraging. Its by d eyes tht things got messed up. Its by d eyes tht earth looks like a circled flat plain. Its by d eyes tht d sun looks like its moving.

    As 4evolution fact,i'm sure theist r smart ppl too,unfortunately none can present any papers 2counter evolution in d arena. U think u can?

  • @mykegoh the earth only looked flat from a certain point of view but apon closer inspection a flat earth is easily falsifiable. It was a story to keep the common person from exploring by the powers that were in control. The pyramid builders now about a round earth and precession of the earth as evidenced in the construction and hieroglyphs. The theory itself IMO isn't falsifiable by the terms that it is set up. This is why Evolutuion starts with created life not aboigenisis.

  • @smoothpeople33 Again u don't make sense n sounds incoherent. 2D, wit eyes is what human sees, not until u can mobilise around an object than u'll know its formation in 3D. Anything u can't comprehend wit ancient eyes r described in 2D, hence flat earth.

    ..This is why Evolutuion starts with created life not aboigenisis....RUBBISH.

    It's abiogenesis, it expalins how life can be created by non-life... evolution does not explain life but diversity of life, abiogenesis explains life.

  • Dinosaurs have been found in the fossil record, and have been found in written history, that's how science and historical evident works. Lucy, as has been shown, is an ape. Different bones from different areas found at similar depths shows further proof for creation. Evolutionists are not making mistakes, they are being fraudulent.

  • @warriorprince1010 Another creationist joke??? Bible god indicates earth is more or less 6000 yo. Written history of dinasuars?? Are u even coherent?

    Dream on...

  • Dinosaurs have been found in the fossil record, and have been found in written history, that's how science and historical evident works. Lucy as has been shown is an ape. Different bones from different areas found at similar depths shows further proof for creation. Evolutionists are not making mistakes, they are being fraudulent.

  • This is the funniest video I've seen!!! OOowwhh, the earliest of human anatomy miyilions of years ago. Why is Lucy so rare huh? There should be Miyilions of others around her complete in detail, not just a Pathetic bone collection. What about mans footprints beside dinos then? explain that one??

  • @ironman197268 Clearly you don't understand how rare fossilization is. A very specific process has to occur for a skeleton to become a fossil, and even then, that doesn't mean they will be preserved long enough to be found. How do you know we wont find more when we dig deeper anyway?And by the way, even major creationsts don't believe the foot print with the dino print thing. They were clearly doctored. And badly at that. You really need to do some research on these subjects before you comment.

  • @ironman197268 ...... What about mans footprints beside dinos then? explain that one??....

    Interesting ...where did you get this piece of information..can you cite the source of this info?...otherwise u're talking crap.

  • we are not even here, this is just a glimpse of nothing

  • I am descended from the Bird Creator, Greetings, I am BirdMamma, bow down to me..... nnnnnEYAJJJJJJJ!!!!!!

  • I went to see this at the pacific science center, was interesting.

  • millions of years from now they'll say OUR brains were too small to be a link in their chain

  • yup and they will laugh at our immaturity of going to war and believing in stupid things like racism and religion...boy i wish i could visit the future and the past

  • @xmuneebx I soooooooo agree with you man :)

    Religion is so ridiculous !

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more