Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Be cautious. The aspiration to success can ruin a general purpose - compassion. Intimate sympathy gives energy for an active life, instead of will to fortune.

    Bad karma will pursue such people and they can lose the place in the world of pure souls. ....And at the last minute, when Suprem moral law counts up ours egoistic or human acts and feelings (!!!! feeling are more important than acts) - little sympathy to another's pain -may not suffice for the further incarnations on our planet.

  • thank u for sharing

  • Comment removed

  • thank you very much for uploading

  • thANKH you very much

  • Mr. Chopra, thank you! Love and Light.

  • love him

  • What year is it from ?

  • thank you!!

    thank you!!

    thank you!!

    thank you!!

    for uploading the entire video!!!

    namaste

  • While I support Dawkins in that "god", as the three major religions interpret and promote through their dogmas....i find it sad that he seems to miss the fact that science can be just as dogmatic and rigid as many religious believers. Just because you can't see, taste, smell, touch, or perform the scientific method on something...doesnt mean it does or doesnt exist.

  • @MrA9H9 I strongly agree. :). It's almost as if atheism is becoming a religion of its own. :S

  • @MrA9H9

    Very true, I think "Dawkins" is just a very childish person who is making a living out of acting childish. He makes some good "common sense to anybody with a brain" statements about "dogma." But that doesn't make him a good person, I hope he does something worthwhile as a scientist or whatever the heck he is.

  • @MrA9H9 The thing is: what is more delusional? Believe in the existence of a Supreme Being that gave the 'push' to evolution or that our universe came out of NOTHING?  Surely believing that EVERYTHING came out of NOTHING is like believing in miracles too!!!

  • @evakent3 But no one believes it came out of nothing. Energy and forces had to exist.

    But it seems more likely that the universe evolved, instead of there always just magically was a super being. Which is more rational ?

    Notice how all religious books never state about something specifically in the future, so you can verify it, like small mobile devices will allow communication instantly across the world, it's always vague moral stuff that everyone knows anyway. Theism is worthless.

  • @QuiteNot you have to have nothing for there to be something..?

  • This book has saved me from my spiritual and subconsious hell

  • these videos are fantastic . thank you is too small a word!!!

  • thank you for these videos :-)

  • Nice information, thanks.

  • thank you for this

  • good thoughts

  • I think thoughts are bit more indian ,but very true

  • Truth is always universe.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more