@mactopolis Yes an "odd" sounding voice and probably the best voice ever! He has a feeling inbuilt in his tone wich no other tenor has, like "a tear of silver" as they say. If the voice was small ore not is only of academic interest today while we can only here him on recordings.
@MrRcirillo I think you are mistaken. Bjoerling had a very small voice. Simply because Caruso chose not to sing everything in "full voice" does not make his voice weaker or stronger.
Very similar to the Pavarotti version, but neither singer is truly in the style of bel canto, for which this piece was written. Their voices are too powerful and forceful But, having said that, it is a great version.
@tomfroekjaer - I wll see if I also have That Caruso's version but in any case Caruso was always great and Jussi and Caruso's voice had that special vibration that other lack. Thanks.
Yes, nadaniente115a - wow, quite a username :-) - Caruso was an "intuitive" singer. He, according to his own statement, never heard himself sing when performing - only on recordings. He sort of "disappeared" into his own interpretation. I don't think Caruso meant to break with the bel canto tradition of singing intentionally.
Possibly he didn't even know exactly what bel canto was or that this aria was supposed to be sung in that style. Indeed, he may not have had enough singing lessons to know. Caruso was a "Neapolitan peasant" with two years of formal schooling. He had difficulties reading, but he spoke some 7 languages. Quite a fellow ...
I believe myself, tom, that the great artisys are the ones who have the courage to do it their own way - if they also have the talent we are all fortunate to see how the world suddenly becomes more interesting and vast tan we imagined... :-) your comments make a lot of sense to me... thanks for sharing...
He was a radio tenor
mactopolis 1 year ago
This rendition sucks
mactopolis 1 year ago
@mactopolis Why?
nadaniente115a 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mactopolis He has an odd sounding voice..it's a very small voice
mactopolis 1 year ago
@mactopolis Yes an "odd" sounding voice and probably the best voice ever! He has a feeling inbuilt in his tone wich no other tenor has, like "a tear of silver" as they say. If the voice was small ore not is only of academic interest today while we can only here him on recordings.
suffes 11 months ago
Бесподобно !!!!!!!!!!!
nita8100 1 year ago
That was wonderful!
walshseant 1 year ago
altro che pavarotti....
1salvatoremartorana 1 year ago
Caruso has a week ass voice compared to Jussi
MrRcirillo 1 year ago
@MrRcirillo I think you are mistaken. Bjoerling had a very small voice. Simply because Caruso chose not to sing everything in "full voice" does not make his voice weaker or stronger.
seektheforce 1 year ago
Very similar to the Pavarotti version, but neither singer is truly in the style of bel canto, for which this piece was written. Their voices are too powerful and forceful But, having said that, it is a great version.
PhysicsProf1 2 years ago
Thank you for your comment. I would never compare Bjorling to Pavarotti, but I am verey curious to learn who does it better than Bjorling... :-)
nadaniente115a 2 years ago
@nadaniente115a Tecnicaly Schipa does it better, but I tend to get bored by his voice. Björling's version remains my favourite.
Addeludde 2 years ago
Yes, Schipa is too sweet, "sleepy", monotonous, I agree... :-)
nadaniente115a 2 years ago
Comment removed
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
@nadaniente115a: Enrico Caruso's version from 1904 I think is better than Jussi's (and Pavarotti's). - Just my opinion - as everything ...
I've uploaded Caruso's version from 1904 and 1911.
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
@tomfroekjaer - I wll see if I also have That Caruso's version but in any case Caruso was always great and Jussi and Caruso's voice had that special vibration that other lack. Thanks.
nadaniente115a 2 years ago
PhysicsProf1: maybe the bel canto tradition was initially broken by Caruso. Possibly inadvertently - being quite an emotional singer.
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
@tomfroekjaer - sometimes aesthetic changes just happpen that way, someone has the skills to do it differently... it makes sense
nadaniente115a 2 years ago
Yes, nadaniente115a - wow, quite a username :-) - Caruso was an "intuitive" singer. He, according to his own statement, never heard himself sing when performing - only on recordings. He sort of "disappeared" into his own interpretation. I don't think Caruso meant to break with the bel canto tradition of singing intentionally.
..continued ...
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
Possibly he didn't even know exactly what bel canto was or that this aria was supposed to be sung in that style. Indeed, he may not have had enough singing lessons to know. Caruso was a "Neapolitan peasant" with two years of formal schooling. He had difficulties reading, but he spoke some 7 languages. Quite a fellow ...
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
I believe myself, tom, that the great artisys are the ones who have the courage to do it their own way - if they also have the talent we are all fortunate to see how the world suddenly becomes more interesting and vast tan we imagined... :-) your comments make a lot of sense to me... thanks for sharing...
nadaniente115a 2 years ago
@nadaniente115a: yes, I fully agree with that!
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
i have no idea why the video sometimes is not working well... sorry... :-)
nadaniente115a 2 years ago
whats up with the video?
gilc7540 2 years ago
Best furtiva Lagrima I've heard......!!
thehix 2 years ago
i guess not... ! :-)
nadaniente115a 3 years ago
it sue doesnt
GrandDraggon66 2 years ago
It doesn't get much better than this.
JOlsson01 3 years ago 2