Tchaikovsky (1969) (English subtitles). Part 1/2.

[rok1339]

thank you veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery mmmmmmmmmmuch for this video. I search every where for it I like it very much specially for the best acting smoktounvsky of course besides his roll in hamlet.please upload part2/2.It is a film about a great composer so we must listen without any jugment,again thanks a lot.

[TheABT2]

Bellissimo Film! Peccato che non si possa scaricare da nessuna parte :(

[antoniogarg1]

FINALMENTE SIAMO RIUSCITI A VEDERE QIESTO FILM!

[rbbonotto]

Tchaikovsky's uncensored diaries were published more than two decades ago; he coded these passages with the letter "Z." Even Gerald Abraham -- one of the best writers on music fifty years ago -- his book "German and Slavonic music" is a wonderful read, with great articles on (straight) Dvorak and (straight) Liadov -- treated Tchai's homosexuality as an acknowledged fact.

[rbbonotto]

RoboSlater, research is usually meaningless unless an intelligent person is doing it.

[RoboSlater]

My research shows a campaign to label every significant influence in history as homosexual: Lincoln, Rand, Washington, Tchaikovsky, J Edgar Hoover, ... it's part of the gay agenda to do so.

[rm2685]

Spasibo!

[Alexnfr1]

which conductor is ist ???? from 52:02 ?? which recording ?

[elcorama]

español?



[elikrussel]

The truth is - he was not homosexuals. It's a myth that was made on purpose.

[Jalilvideogeek93]

@elikrussel He was a homosexual. It shouldn't be a shame that he was. Why would a myth be made up about his sexuality, what purpose would it serve? It makes no sense. He was a homosexual and people must accept that, there's nothing wrong with that.

[Cray2thousand]

@Jalilvideogeek93, Well said! what does his sexual preference have to do with his music????

[RoboSlater]

@Jalilvideogeek93 I'm curious: what evidence is there that he was homosexual and why do you care to label him so?

[DerrickthePinecone]

@RoboSlater The gay community wants to make EVERYONE gay. They even want the animals to be gay--it's just plain weird. "If you're not gay; you should be." It's all anatomically incorrect, to begin with...

[bayreuth79]

@Jalilvideogeek93 You haven't told us why there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. Is it because there is nothing right or wrong (i.e., moral relativism)? If there is nothing wrong with homosexual acts than please enlighten us all as to why. Is this is just another piece of liberal western arrogance? The highest value for liberals is tolerance; and yet they cannot tolerant anything but their own values. Ironic.

[DerrickthePinecone]

@Jalilvideogeek93 Homosexuality is a sin. In reality, when you think about it, a man's penis wasn't made for the anal cavity. It's ANATOMICALLY INCORRECT. I'm no homophobe by any means, but I don't think it's right, and science/reality shows that it's wrong, based on anatomy.

[GreenBaldrick]

@DerrickthePinecone There are homosexual animals. That proves that it's not against nature. There are prostate and it's stimulation can cause an orgasm during anal intercourse and make both partners come. That proves that sexual act between two men is not against nature. What about science..ask any sexologist about homosexuality and you will hear that it's NOT AGAINST NATURE.

[Darkonomist]

@GreenBaldrick I agree with you that it is not "against" nature, and as far as I know most scientists would confirm. Yes, sex with anyone or anything can be stimulating. However, homosexuality causes more damage to health (human and animal alike) than heterosexuality.

Moreover, I do not see Nature as our authority on what is supposed to be and how we as Humans are supposed to behave. In Nature, many animals kill their stepchildren. Do we have to be like them just because it is natural?

[DerrickthePinecone]

@GreenBaldrick No, there is no such thing as homosexual animals. They lack the mental capacity to identify those types of feelings that transcend animalistic tendencies. It is indeed against nature because it it is anatomically incorrect. This "stimulation" and "orgasms" are all based solely on LUST and fleshy cravings, which feed only the desires of sex, which is ruinous in every capacity to the psyche'. The very act itself is not out of pure love, but out of lust.

[DerrickthePinecone]

@GreenBaldrick By the way, the penis was specifically designed by God for the vagina, and for urinating. The penis was not created for the "back door" (anus)! Why else do you hear of so many problems that come with a penis entering an anus? It wasn't made for an anus! Again, it is all pleasure-filled and all about lust.

[DerrickthePinecone]

@GreenBaldrick Also: If you look at most homosexual relationships, it's all built on lusts and not true love. There have been homosexuals in the past turn to Christ, get saved, and are freed from homosexuality and come to marry the opposite sex and have children! Homosexuality is not "normal" whether people like it or not. The primary PURPOSE of sex is to REPRODUCE and populate the earth. Only a woman can give birth, which speaks for itself...

[Darkonomist]

@Jalilvideogeek93 I myself am a great fan of Tchaikovsky, but be aware that not everyone in the world agrees with accepting homosexual behavior. And for some it is a shame. For me homosexuality carries the same level of shame as being overweight, alcohol addicted or belonging to the army. And there are many complex reasons behind these thoughts.

[ididete]

@Darkonomist you may claim they are complex, but I would say your reasons for putting being overweight, homosexual and an army member is quite arbitrary and nonsensical. It's a part of psychological obsessive-compulsive disorder with cleanliness. Morally speaking it's snobbery. Politically speaking, it is fascism. There is nothing healthy about your views.

[Darkonomist]

@ididete You make a quite poetic statement, but I wonder what can be so unhealthy and disorderly about giving value to "cleanliness", more specifically, to a physically healthy life, to fortitude of mind and to non-violent peace? I do not "snob" homosexuals, obese people or soldiers, but I would be ashamed to be either one of them, and I defend my freedom to express condemnation (and disgust) towards their behaviors.

[GreenBaldrick]

@Darkonomist Homosexuality is not a sin nor deviation.It's just an innate kind of sexuality like heterosexuality and bisexuality.Ask any sexologist.Or just read Wiki.If you were born gay you can't change that just because people say it's wrong.The only way to be happy for a gay is to accept his nature and to try to find his love.How can you blaim homosexuals for their desire to be happy?How can you call it "dusgusting"?It's love too. It's not just about shoving you willie in other man's arse.

[Darkonomist]

@GreenBaldrick 1. Do you have reliable and internationally consistent evidence/proof that homosexuality (or any kind of sexual 'orientation') is "innate"? Or does any sexologist have? As far as I have researched, the answer is no. 2. Based on my knowledge from 1, I do not view homo- or heterosexuality as "someone's nature" but a behavior, influenced by social or individual choice and culture. Like the choice to find pleasure in ANY other lifestyle or taste that I may happen to criticize.

[iraqi0boy]

thanks so much

it's really so rare movie

i expected the film would tell more important details about Tchaikovsky

but anyway it's good film for great composer

[TheCampqueen]

СПАСИБО!

[lolofaoudi]

Thank you so much for posting this movie.I couldn't imagine that a biography of Tchaikovsky would be made into a movie in USSR.Well,apart from the performance of Smoktunovsky the movie is,unfortunately,mediocre.It gets on my nerves when they depict him depressed and sad without reason.He was a sensitive man that suffered from the hypocrisy of his era.I wouldn't expect the soviets to be honest and speak of his homosexuality,but that's why this movie is culturaly dated,because it hides the truth.

[outoftunefiddler]

очень, очень мило!

[Klinossophistis]

Εἶμαι ἐνθουσιασμένος ποὺ τὸ ξαναβρῆκα. Τὸ εἴχαμε δεῖ τότε καὶ χάθηκε ἡ ταινία ἀπὸ τὶς αἴθουσες.

[hhshokrai]

I cannot believe...thank you so much for posting this. I watched this film about 20 years ago, such a wonderful composer and lovely depiction of Russia. Very good job indeed. :-)

[MataMutilaKema]

Thank you very much, I can't believe that this movie is in youtube, it´s so dificult to find. Thanks, really.

[adekbule]

thank you so much for uploading this film!

[MidsunCelebration]

Wonderful!! How great you uploaded this movie, and in only 2 parts :-)) Thank you!!

Jeanne