Added: 4 years ago
From: hollywodhack
Views: 103,892
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (967)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oh boy do I remember the hell houses. They genuinely freaked some of my friends out. Not in a fun haunted house kind of way. I used to see them as fun but now that I know more than the christian worldview I used to subscribe to I know that it's a destructive tool just for the sake of conversion. They had a room at the very end of EVERY hell house so that if you decided to follow jesus after seeing it you could sign a card & pray a prayer. Sounds fucked up to me now just typing this... *shudder*

  • IF YOU GUYS DON'T BELIEVE ME,YOU SHOULD PRACTICE MEDITATION .WHEN YOU DO THE MEDITATION MATURELY AND DEPTHLY ,YOU WILL FIND OUT THAT IS NO GOD AT ALL,ALL YOU HAVE IS RESULT WHICH IS YOU DID,IT IS CAUSE AND EFFECT METHOD IN BUDDHISM

  • I went to a faith school. St James Church of England.

    I found going to church on a Thursday a great break from lessons!

  • tube.com/watch?v=RaDTWZIXfLU

    watch the real explanation of Christianity. This christianity that is thought in tehe west is a romancatholic protestant christianity and is WRONG

    ONLY THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY HAS A TRUE RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD

  • @2paacalipse When you see any empirical evidence of any god, please point it out to yourself, assuming you have any idea of the definition of the "Scientific Method".

    In the meantime, take your bible, and shove it where the sun doesn't shine, as it's pure crap.

  • @yourtreat2 why is there no evidence when Roman Empire clearly states that a "man" Jesus lived the life the gospel say and ended up the way He did?

    you level of communication says enough

  • Wait a minute? Evolution happened very slowly in process over millions of years. Isn't contraditory to say that there is not enough time for a person to learn on its own? That it must learn from an authoritative figure? Isn't that just the opposite of the slowly evolving process? Can someone help me out on this please?

  • @coach8401

    See if you can find Dawkin's book - The Greatest Show On Earth.

    He explains evolution throughly there

  • @DreamingOfInsanity Thanks for the reply. Will definetely read up on it!

  • @coach8401 Yeah. I can help you.

    Get a fucking education and pull your head out of your ass for a few minutes.

  • @yourtreat2 You must have no life if all you do is go through the messages and swear at people. Typical athiest. Inconsiderate, selfish, hypocritical, closed minded fool. Do us all a favor and stay out of the way, while the rest of us try to help others and sincerely do what we can because we truely care about them. You have given nothing and done nothing for this world. So back off and enjoy living your fractured life. What does it matter to you anyway, remember you have no purpose in life.

  • 2:46 "I Dont Know"

  • BUDDHA IS NOT LIKE ANY RELIGION.BUDDHA IS DIFFERENT WITH ANY RELIGION.BUDDHA IS A NO GOD EXISTENCE RELIGION ,IT IS CLOSE TO SCIENCE.SO TO ME BUDDHA IS LAST FOREVER !!!!

  • @asialotus2011 "BUDDHA IS A NO GOD EXISTENCE RELIGION ,IT IS CLOSE TO SCIENCE"

    Epic fail.

    When you find any evidence of souls or reincarnation, please point it out to yourself, assuming you learn the "Scientific Method".

  • DO YOU KNOW ENERGY PRESERVATION METHOD OF ALBERT EINSTEIN,SCIENTISTS ONLY PROVE THIS METHOD IN THINGS,BUT THE BUDDHA CAN PROVE THIS METHOD ON HUMAN AFTER DEATH BY HIS ATTAINMENT,NOT revelation FROM ANY GOD IN HEAVEN

  • @asialotus2011 Well not necessarily. The Buddha himself was an agnostic, but his ways were of innerself.

  • Imagine a God who lets women and children burn in hell for eternity, just for using the logic they were born with. Why people would waste their lives worshipping a murderous psycho god, is beyond me.

  • i love you , richard dawkins!! you have a friend in Friendship, Maine usa

  • ppl are dumbasses they just need someone to scare them into doing whats right....that sums up the second guys ramble lol

  • "the moon came from the ocean" LOLOL, where the F@#$ did he hear that?!!

  • ahhh the moon's from the ocean. that makes sense.

  • Teach religion in Church.

    Teach science in school.

    Is that too difficult to ask?

  • The problem I have with Richard Dawkins is that, while an extremely intelligent man, he is unfortunately, just as, if not more dogmatic and antagonistic than the people he opposes. I do believe that there is most likely a god, but I am not stupid. The earth is nowhere near 5000 years old, Noah's ark could not have possibly happened as was said in the bible, and evolution is a fact. Dawkins however seems to believe that all manifestations of religion whatsoever are harmful.

  • @krakhaid Because they are, at least as far as dogmatic religions go. It's easy to say that an improvable god is behind everything in the universe. However, by putting your entire belief in this, you purposely hinder yourself from understanding the truth of life, the cosmos, and even things like basic psychology and physiology. It's a purposeful hindrance of understanding the truth of our world, and a shield from the majesty of the amazing universe we so insignificantly are a part of.

  • @krakhaid The problem with Dawkins is he lets the creationists turn 'evolution vs religion' into 'Atheists vs God ' And it is really science discovering things that prove the Bible wrong.

  • he's runing a school where kids are being taught utter bullshit, in which he does not even believe? what a fucking tosser.

  • @3:41 before "teaching" kids about religion, they need to teach the kids how to at least hold a pencil properly!

  • Nothing is ''wrong'' it's just that somethings have negative results so we egoically call them wrong.

  • It's an accent show down!!!

    Joking. I love how well Dawkins handles the questions. He's an amazing ass hole. A funny one too.

  • Dawkins has a very average, maybe above average IQ, based on his ability to explain, and put together questions and answers in improvised settings....hard to believe people follow him....hilarious even

  • i teach my children that evolution is a ly ! jesus loves u

  • Uber suggestible, hollow headed Ameritards + religion = bad medicine!

  • Wow. This plebeian is a self-confessed borderline paedophile held back from his kiddy lust only by a fairy tale that portents pitchforks being rammed up his clacker if he tastes 'the other white meat'!

    lmao xD

  • @Sablicious glad someone noticed that too

  • @cellcoremax1 Yeah.

    It seems like many use religion like some rampart between them and complete, utter lawlessness and immorality.

    It's like god created such a broken crop of 'children' he had to impose laws just to keep them acting even remotely civil! Is this 'god' really that inept at creating his minions?! o_0

    Maybe god needs to look into a review of his Q&A department if it takes threats of aeons of torture to deter paedophiles and the like from plying their dubious trades. -_-

  • @cellcoremax1 It seems that this god made a great many mistakes. like the creation of man and angels in the first place.

  • Indeed God's plans are either failing or twisted why do peopel worship the sick twisted prick that kills millions...

  • Intelligent man... I like this guy Dawkins...

  • Richard is god..

  • The Religious feelings of Humanity is but their Nurturing Spirit, the passing along of behaviors as all higher creatures depend upon for survival, but after all history, Dawkins asks to arrest parents from the historical path of nurture into a new age of scientific treatment of the children. This is very problematic in that Dawkins has no real idea of the outcomes of a humanity trained in a purist sense of scientific consensus of whom ?  The world becomes a new Empire of Scientists ?

  • While Nature gives all higher creatures the Nurturing Spirit to care for their young and train them in many tasks that can not be passed along by DNA, Dawkins is against the Natural Rights of Parents to raise their children in their own Nurture , in a natural sense of biological ascent. This is then a contradiction for Dawkins, he likes Natural Selection to Nurture and determine outcomes, but human children must be divorced from their natural parents and their express nurturing behaviors.

  • Good we don't have Christan shit in Norwegian schools.....

  • @heisenfeis enig med deg der!

  • I can't believe Dawkins didn't push the morality argument down that guy's throat. He said "If there is no god, then there is no law giver, why does it matter what I do? Why is rape wrong?" Uhhh because you'll go to jail? Because the father of the girl might hurt you? Because you'll get rapped in the ass in prison for the rest of your life? DUH!? God has nothing to do with morality. Humans live in Societies, as social creatures. If we get out of line, we have to answer to PEOPLE. NOT GOD

  • @Sanosukeafo I see that slightly differently. I see morality as a normal natural human value. As humans live in packs. We're social beings. We rely on each other. Alone we're weak and can't accomplish anything.

    We're all a little bit family in a sense.

    When someone gets hurt, I get hurt. It hurts to see suffering, because it affects us a the group of humans we are.

    I wouldn't get in trouble with any laws, because none of what I naturally do violates any laws.

  • @a1mint How is that different then what I said? Yes We have use of language and reason, so we make advanced laws and such, but we don't have to be "lawyers" to understand how to get along in our society. We know instinctively that if you do something to piss off another human, they may (more then likely) retaliate in some way shape or form. On top of all this, we have adv laws. In the end I think we can agree that society works great without god (Most societies work BETTER with LESS GOD btw)

  • @Sanosukeafo Your focus was more on the punishment consequences. I think most people are good because it's natural, not because of possible punishment as a consequence.

    However, now that you put it in a way where people might retaliate in some way, I can't disagree with that.

    Indeed, piss someone off, and expect a reaction.

    So, it's probably a combination of things, depending on the person.

    "god" might be another element for some.

  • @a1mint It's not just "Punishment", all our actions cause other humans to have reactions. Give someone a gift, and they're probably not going to punch you in the face. Morality is all a mix of common sense, human instinct and our advanced laws based on how we get along with each other. God is thrown in for some people, but my point is that "god" and "religions are fake, man made and religious rules and laws are mostly immoral (ALL immoral if you get to the heart of WHY they even follow them)

  • Religious people follow "gods" rules, like kill homosexuals (immoral rule), so that they can get into heaven and be granted immortality (Immoral reason to follow any rule, it's a gimme.. I want reward system). Other, natural, truly moral rules we have in normal societies are moral on both fronts. Don't assault people (it's a good rule because it follows the golden rule line of thinking) and nonreligious people know that it's the right thing to do (Moral reason). End of Story 

  • religion breeds intolerance and ego.

  • Comment removed

  • I've noticed that whenever Dawkins is dealing with ignorant comments of nonsense, he tends to blink rapidly. I would only guess he's trying to keep the spray of Bullshit out of his eyes.

  • @Boogers32150 this is made even funnier by yesterdays south park

  • @Boogers32150 - That is the best thing I have ever heard on YouTube. Respect.

  • @Boogers32150 ah'haha clever :)

  • @Boogers32150 Dawkins is such a liar! He cares about why in this video, but when asked to debate William Lane Craig, he commented that "someone told me that you scientists are real good at answering the how questions, what about the why questions?" "Well, it's because a why question is just silly to me!" But here he exclaims the exact opposite!

  • Religion is based on faith. Science is based on evidence. Keep religion out of the classroom because it has nothing to do with science at all.

  • @kuhj278 Problem for religion is most of the mystery of the universe is solved by science and the only way they can have any credibility is to make scientific arguments that do not hold true. What fantastic story in the bible can they quote for the proof of god without looking like complete dumb fucks? And without those stories as proof, there is no more leap of faith to take because the entire idea is just too fantastic if you don't put it in some context.

  • @kuhj278 Science is based on faith too. Many theories are not proven at all. We as theists acknowledge common sense theories such as gravity, speed, etc... but what we don't is how life began. Tell me, which theory do you accept for the dinosaurs dieing?

  • @coach8401 Many scientific theories aren't proven without any doubt but that doesn't mean that science is based on faith. Why do you want to discuss dinosaurs btw? Do you actually believe that they went extinct 6,000 years ago?

  • @kuhj278 Why not? If you present all that as evidence, there should be some fact at least? Not just have a white coat say, I think this is what happened, have others accept it and teach it as fact. As for dinosaurs, why not? Look at how much we have advanced within these last 20 years. I truely believe the bible where many dinosaurs where killed in Noah's flood, and those that survived became extinct as many other animals, when humans populated the area.

  • @kuhj278 Again, which dinosaur theory do you accept? The one I grew up with is the one where an asteroid hit the earth bringing about an ice age. I still cannot understand that, as there is not scientific data or current occurences to back this up. Don't get me wrong, I like science, but I just can't see how many want to say science trumps the bible when science is different in that it looks for cures, health, etc... and the bible is after one's spiratual being as a human in this life.

  • @coach8401 Any geologist would disagree with you. Saying that there's no scientific evidence that the earth was hit by one or more asteroids about 65 million years ago that helped eradicate 50% of all life on earth just shows that you haven't really looked into it. Just google ''evidence for exctinction of dinosaurs'' and you will find many people who can explain it better than I

  • @kuhj278 ??? I think you got this mixed up! I'm saying this is the theory I grew up with (scientifically) being taught in the school system. So you just proved my point. I'm just saying, Also, in regards to the asteroids killing 50% of all life forms, where does this come from? A majority of life forms have been killed by humans, which populate an area, and there's proof of that today. As for known geologists, I know my wife's dad, my pastor, an uncle, and 2 friends who are geologists.

  • @coach8401 How exactly did I just prove your point?

  • @kuhj278 Because! I said, this is what was taught to me (meaning, this is why I don't take it for true and thus far, don't 100% trust ALL scientific theories), and what you told me was that 50% of geologists whould disagree with me showing that there is no single hand evidence showing that asteroids helped eradicate 50% of all life forms. I said the same thing, in a simpler way. Basically, some theories I'll accept and some I won't.

  • @coach8401 ''what you told me was that 50% of geologists whould disagree with me showing that there is no single hand evidence showing that asteroids'' I never said that. Also you don't believe that there's any evidence for this theory and therefore you don't believe it. That is different from actually looking at the evidence and making reasonable assumptions based on that evidence instead of dismissing it all as faith without even looking into it.

  • @kuhj278 Sorry misread your comment. Any geologist would disagree with me on the scientific evidence, you meant. It just baffles me that something happens, then scientists have an explanation that every million years or so that particular incident takes place. As for the bible that has the best historical documents and proven by historical standards and archaelogical standards with over 3,000+ facts, but scientists say that's not plausible?

  • @coach8401 If what you say is true then scientists wouldn't say it's all bullshit just for the sake of opposing religion. I find it very hard to believe that the bible contains any historical facts, things like the nativity we know are bullshit, we know that not all first-born in Egypt died and we know that there was no worldwide flood that killed all but a handful people and animals. If you could give any example(s) that'd be great

  • @kuhj278 Of course they would! They choose not to believe it, but I too oppose religion! For this you have to understand that the flood didn't have to take place in the whole world, it could've just taken place where Noah and his family lived. As the world, there are 18 evidences of either massive flooding or erosion, with either extremely rapid layering of strata, or direct evidence which were found in numerous places on virtually every continent

  • @kuhj278 Google proof of noah's flood and it should be the fourth one down (Scientific Evidence for a Worldwide Flood).

  • It doesnt matter if you truly belive in the creation or not, it's not science! Science is based on evidence, creation is based on fiction. If you believe in creation, fine, but if you want it taught in school, then show us the evidence for it! Show us evidence that can be recognized as reliable!

  • @lasseplatburk You're right, science is science and creation is faith. Science is looking for how stuff works, as creationism shows how one should live spiritually and morally. As for science being defined as evidence, most theories are not flat fact. Gravity, air, etc... are, but how life began, how we came about, etc... is not. That's just basic belief which isn't even proven in the fossil record proving evolution, it is just a thought.

  • quite irrelevant but I've always read in novels and literature of people who "look" sharp or have a certain something in their eyes that speaks of their intellect. Dawkins definitely has that look.

  • If I have my way, one day teaching religion to children will be treated by the law as child abuse, no different than torture. I unfortunately was taught these beliefs as a child, and they had huge detrimental effects on me.

  • The sum of all subjective accounts of acknowledgement defines the truth

    Science is trying to explore and experiment to achieve a new state of truth.

    Religion is trying to explain and readjust to preserve the ancient ultimate truth.

    If there are no oxygen to breathe on, what happens? We die, physically,spiritually it's unknown. Therefore it's true, we physically die. However, this truth is conditional, just like science and religion in particular instances. Hard to be objective and absolute!

  • I have quickly come to recognize the look on dawkins face when the other person is way outta line and doesn't know what they're talking about.

  • This Bob Dylan singing the song in the beginning?

  • Indoctrination is not Education

  • Delusional retarded people , this is child abuse....mental brainwashing , a form of rape . poor kids

  • serial Killers will tell you they believed they were God so teaching children about God as the supreme being is very important so the youth wont all follow the I am God pretense.

  • I think unleashing complete freedom on a human being is a much more terrifying concept than religion.

  • @hakushinkan It's unfortunate you were brainwashed as a child into thinking that freedom is bad. :-(

  • @azdgariarada I write one sentence and you think you have enough to assume so much of my childhood? I think you're the one who needs the look at himself, not me.

    Just look at the pages of history, at cases in which people had just a little too much freedom. Some think humans are inherently good, I think we're a vicious, brutal race of ruthless murderers, cannibals and rapists. Just look at your own sexual fantasies, for example, and you'll know I'm right.

  • @hakushinkan If you've mostly associated with christians I can see why you'd view the human race as "vicious, brutal, ruthless, murderers, cannibals, and rapists".

    It's also common to assume that if we have horrible sexual fantasies, that others must also. Unfortunately, it's just you in this case. :-( My fantasies are full of whipped cream, not whips.

  • @azdgariarada You've been wrong on all accounts, which I expected you to be, since you're human like the rest of us. The fact I knew you would assume I have horrible sex fantasies just because I said most people should have them, and the fact you assumed I came from a background that teaches the things I said (christianity), proves to me that I'm more observant and objective than you give me credit for.

    I'm jewish, and my sex fantasies are pretty common and normal.

  • @hakushinkan I never said you were christian, i said "if you've associated with christians". On a related note, I just heard this little "poem".

    Odd of God to choose the Jews?

    Not odd of God, the goyim annoy him.

  • @azdgariarada Well I just need to point out, I was brought up jewish, but I'm actually more of an agnostic/atheist.

  • I dont think Richard is a dick, I feel he is growing impatient with religion's intransigence.

  • 03:05 exactly. And thats why you and so many others are religious.

  • It's obvious to people like me, Dawkins, and maybe even you that the actual existance "god" is a farce...god does't exist.

  • Wow and I thought this was actually going to be interesting. This is just down right stupid! This stupid man feels that people can't think for themselves. So instead of thinking for yourself, listen to what he has to say, and believe him??? Isn't this the very same thing he was just saying, that you listen to others???

  • The Phoenix Academy was the first thing I saw, knowing it's an elitist word. I love thinking for myself, this is dangerous in this land where we call free but are we? Christianity is another form of Paganism.

  • The Phoenix Academy was the first thing I saw, knowing it's an elitist word. I love thinking for myself, this is dangerous in this land where we call free but are we?

  • "The child brain will automatically believe what it's told, even if what it's told is nonesense. And then when the child grows up it will tend to pass on that same nonesense to it's children." - Best line ever.

  • first!

  • if the christian god exists, he has sucky management skills. look at us. we are crazy as a race :D and not for the better all the time

  • Well you can't really say that since he gave us free will. You are just scrazy only because you are! Don't blame him for your short coming!!

  • I get the feeling that dawkins is not that much of an intelligent person,or that he deliberately misleads naive people from one dogma to another.His military religious fanatics sound like a joke considering the crimes of capitalism policies(capitalism's god is money)and his oversimplification of the terms truth and objective truth make me laugh.This guy is out there to pick idiots and convert them to amoralistic technocratic rational lobotomized robotic idiots.You know what..... FUCK YOU

  • @asasasarap money is not evil, kid. do you even KNOW why money is important for society? Because it's a motive for people to work and produce services and products that improve society. Money is what you get in EXCHANGE for services. pretty simple. i'm not sure why you call EVERYONE a robot, and then say "fuck you".

  • @JohnF30Music haha for real!? maybe ur evil. freedom to do as i please would motivate me to help out society. but i cant because i dont have enough money lol. withouth the concept of money and owning things i myself and my friends would have benefit'd greatly by now

  • I have 4 Years of christian education under my belt and I can honestly say that it transformed me into an atheist. Mixing religion in education is very harmful to the growth of intelligence. I thank Old Dominion University for the advent of reason and science in my life.

  • Noah's Ark in science textbooks? that will make me hate reading

  • 898 people are going to hell, including me

  • the Principal reminds me of a born again Ricky Gervaias

  • I used to do these "ACE's" over homeschooling, now i am an atheist... touche

  • "If there is no lawgiver, why is rape wrong? Why is pedophilia wrong? Why is murder wrong?"

    HOLY FUCK. And that guy believes his reasoning, too! If that was true, people who didn't use God as their pillar of morality- ie, atheists- would all be homicidal pederast rapists... and we really, really aren't.

  • atheistic propaganda based on dogma, the absolute truth.

    paradox is that Dawkins is a conservative today.intelligent design explains more, chaos, catastrophes, accidents as a creator of nanotechnology and quantum computers in every cell of my body is outdated attitude. I will not mention the cosmos and harmony necessary for the development of my body and my thoughts.

  • @woodoocaja was that supposed to be remotely clear?

  • @ultimateZigzag I do not need evidence for evolution, I need proof of abiogenesis, origin of DNA RNA,

    offers the only blind belief in the theory can not be proven in the laboratory.I'm sorry for imperfect English, I use Google translate.I believed for a long time to Darwin, Dawkins and related ministers.

    genome has been decoded, the DNA also.Science shook my faith in science.Nobody knows anything for sure, it's the only truth that is verifiable.This is a virtual world,persistent illusion.

  • Thanks for uploading these hollywodhack (Y)

  • I hate it when religionists use that stupid, "If god isn't real, why don't we all just go around raping and murdering" argument. If the only reason that you don't hurt others is because you are afraid your god will send you to hell after you die, then you have no morals, just fear. Even if you are doing what you think is right to please your god because you love him and believe he loves you, that still isn't morality, it's obedience. Religion has no morals, just fear and submission. Very kinky.

  • I hate the whole idea of telling children about hell. I think it is child abuse and should be stopped. I think when I child turns 7 years old the Catholic Church has a ceremony, because 7 is the age of reason for the Catholics. This means once you reach 7 if you die you can spend eternity in hell or purgatory. It is quite shameful to tell children this kind of rubbish.

  • It's funny he mentioned pedofilla. back in those days people were getting married to adults when they were like 13.

  • Of course the government wants religious schools... people who believe in religion will believe in anything if fed enough of it.. I believe its a political choice in the end to make people believe dim witted and pay more taxes in the end.

  • Its funny how creationists say that if there was no god that people would randomly rape, kill and molest people because most of the criminals in jail are religious

  • 3:10

  • "You just said a very revealing thing"-BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

  • Youtube is truly an intellectual democracy judging by all the positive comments posted here - I hope that youtube is an insight into the future of mankinds thinking and we abandon these monstrous bronze age myths and start living and getting on with each other.

  • @vohshkab you must not look at alot of videos, there are a lot of trolls on youtube

  • for some reason I found 5:57 hilarious. I spit out my drink!!!

  • He's not a "dick"--he's a DILDO!

  • I want to make man babys with dawkins

  • Oh my, that "Yes" by Dawkins at 3:16 was hilarious.

  • Oh my, that "Yes" by Dawkins at 3:20 was hilarious.

  • This documentary is NEEDED. Great job, religion is only bad.

  • He asks him a powerful question at 3:59, one which everyone should ask themselves deep inside.

  • im agnostic and i dont want to rape or be a pedo! -_-

  • What if there is a hell and that's why people try to scare people about because it is so serious. Really though, what if turns out there is an actual hell, what can be gained by not teaching on it if there is one. You don't teach on it because it is abuse and the person ends up in hell. Maybe hell more than a punishment is just the way it is when one is dead and away from God. Why does he want to kill religion so bad and replace it with science that is just as flawed and incomplete.

  • @swordandsheild1 because if we remove the roadblocks we can move forward faster and understand our world more.

  • @tjv323 What you people are so god damn ignorant about is that even though your worst enemy is theists who force their beliefs down your throat and tells you to get salvaged or burn forever, you present the exact same ideology only with a misconception that you are now the intellectually superior to that person and that you not only have the right to patronise the theist for his belief but to literally try and force him out of it so he can be enlightened like you. Disgusting

  • @wretchedyo I've never once tried to force someone out of their religion. I have debates with them and give them my reasons, and they give me their reasons.

  • @tjv323 I'm not necessarily talking about you. I respect the idea that you are able to debate without solely attacking and acting like a higher being based on belief. It's just a fact that many atheists out there have this mental set-up.

  • @tjv323 I disagree, I have to be Michael Crichton on this one. Without a restraint on some sort of empathy, Scientist we'll go to bounds where we can never return.

    Example:

    -The Jurassic Park. If Dinosaurs return, we'll be fucked.

    -Tons of viruses. It cost money to make a virus, but it cost money to find a cure for it.

    -Gattaca

    I am not saying Atheism is evil, but there needs to be some sort of empathy to prevent it from being evil. Just how Religion is exploiting others nowadays.

  • Richard is kinda a dick and its wonderfull

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous He's like 95% gentleman because of his Geiko Gecko accent, and the 5% dick he is is absolutely awesome. lol

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous No he's not a ''dick'' at all and that's the point. He's being stern and forceful about his points because he needs to be in order to wake people up, and in that way I think he's actually being very gracious.

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous some times we have to be a dick to get through to these people

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous IF RICHARD DAWKINS WASN'T A DICK, I WOULDN'T BE SO INSPIRED BY HIM. CAN I GET AN A-FUCKING-MEN?

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous I wouldn't say he's a dick, but he's pretty stern. What's going on is extremely unfortunate.

  • @BlastBeatDolly He's stern, but that's what he needs to be..it's great haha

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous well, the religious fanatics are even worse.

    at least richard has some good arguments :P

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous

    If you watch his earlier stuff, read his earlier stuff, he wasn't such a dick. But all that talking and trying to debate, with religious people, I would take a toll on my kindness as well.

  • @ignatiusmagnanimous LOLL, Watch Michael Moore of Bill Maher, those are 2 dicks AHHA

  • "if you belife in the story a lot is true" quote?

  • Science has plainly shown evolution to be a hoax. A fraud perpetrated by 'intellectually superior individuals' to deny the existence of God and Jesus so they might live life without any consideration for the Giver of it. This is a filthy, disgusting lie, that needs to be exposed for the fabrication it truly is! Seek the Lord Jesus, He tells us the purpose of our being created in the first place. Don't listen to those who help destroy the human race!

  • @musikmanea mate if you have any proof im with you all the way. fyi science never proved evolution wrong

  • @pavelmdify No one wants evidence, that's been made very clear by the way the leading creationist are ridiculed, ostracized, or completely ignored. It's painfully obvious that the door of science has been slam shut in the face of all the evidence of our Creator. The horror for the people who willfully continue to perpetuate this deception will be when they face their Maker.

  • @musikmanea that is not proof my friend that is gospel.

  • @musikmanea You are only making yourself look VERY bad by spouting these lies about evolution. Part of your religion is supposed to uphold truth and honesty, so you are rubbing your own religion in the mud along with yourself. Just to be clear, not a single person reading these comments believes that evolution is a worldwide 'hoax' as you claim. You have a better chance of convinving people you have a pet dinosaur.

  • @MrStillmans Even though you think you have the authority to speak for everyone here, the people I'm speaking to are those who are able to see past the mind control. The only people with that ability are either called by God the Father of Jesus Christ, or are part of the grand deception. may God bless you.

  • @musikmanea Thank you for putting your thoughts in a educated and polite way. I also salute you that you have the courage to watch these videos when you have such strong beliefs. .

  • @markshep777 Thank you for your kind comment, may our heavenly Father bless you.

  • @musikmanea Your religion is based on fear, perfect example:"Don't listen to those who help destroy the human race!" it is one thing to, falsely, claim that evolution is a wrong but its an entirely different thing to claim that we are destroying the human race, how dare you make such a claim when you are the one ignoring science and reason and the facts plainly in front of your face, and attempting to brainwash people into some false fuzzy religion. Your own faith says be tolerant and your not.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy My life is based on love, perfect love drives out all fear, because in this love you are made capable of trusting in the One who Created you. He has shown us His love first, by sending His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, to die our eternal death for us. All that is required of us to receive this wonderful gift of love is to live in the truth in His presence.The truth cannot tolerate lies, because lies are destruction of truth. This world is a perfect example of what lies cause.

  • @musikmanea yes yes yes he sent his son blah blah blah, let me show you your gods logic, I'm going to create a apple tree then knowing they will disobey me, (because I'm omni intelligent) cause them death. But sense i love them I'm going to reincarnate myself to die for the sin that i caused them to do in the first place.....yea makes a lot of sense right? Your religion is based on the fear of death you even said it yourself. "My life is based on love, perfect love drives out all fear" good try.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy What you just said is not God's logic, it's mans logic and that is why you are only able to view it this way.

  • @musikmanea You simply avoid the realization. "god is wiser therefore he knows better" this is what your bible says you cannot deny that. Stop making excuses for your god and use your brain.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy The One who creates knows far more than the one that is created, that is simple logic seen in every creation of man as well. That is further proof of why man will be without excuse. God said His eternal power and Godhead is revealed in what He has created. Since godless people would rather use their intelligence to deny their Creator than to become more knowledgeable of Him, which should be the logical route, they remain in their ignorance of Him willfully. Use your brain.

  • @musikmanea If he was truely all intelligent, then he would give us clues or at least a spec of evidence that proves hes real. because only completely illogical men would follow a ghost. until your all knowing god wises up i want nothing to do with him.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy People who consider themselves intelligent and cannot understand that their very lives are of no consequence of their doing, astound me. There is not one person on earth who decided to be born, or to which family, race, continent, or any such thing in their life. You lie to yourself when you think you have any say at all unless your Creator gives it to you. Like I said, use your brain, logic it out. You are not your own, your birth and death proves this.

  • @musikmanea No, birth proves your parents did it and death proves that we have a time limit. nothing about any creator or any nonsense. i love how every point i make is completely ignored in order to do more preaching. all your doing is making you're self, and by extension your religion, look completely stupid.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy Yes, it proves your parents had sex and your time is limited in this flesh and if that's all you are able to conclude then I'll leave you in your bliss! God the Father of Jesus Christ bless you.

  • @musikmanea Lmao, yes i'm the one in bliss Mr. flying man in the sky. i hope one day you wake up and smell your ignorance before you waste your life following a fairy tale.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy And the multitude of all the nations that fight against Ariel, even all that fight against her and her munitions, and that distress her, shall be as a dream of a night vision. It shall even be as when a hungry man dreams that he eats but he awakes and his soul is empty, or as a man dreams he is thirsty and drinks, but awakes and is faint with thirst: so shall be the multitude of all the nations that fight against mount Zion. Seek Him while He may yet be found.

  • @musikmanea Thanks for the preaching, but again you lack evidence........ please continue our conversation or stop responding.

  • @TheSameDamnGuy I'll say it plainly for you. You are asleep and dreaming, what you are dreaming are lies planted into your head by our enemy. You believe them. You don't take the time to logic out for yourself the proof of your Creator that is everywhere you look. And you don't see the enemy encamped all around you whom you are too weak to ward off and you will not go to the one who can shed true light on the situation for you, Jesus Christ, His Spirit and His Word.