Added: 5 years ago
From: spooked911
Views: 32,750
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (312)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In the 4-5 second a BIG EXPLOSION is CLEARLY LISTEN, and a BIG DEBRIS is expulsed due to this exposion and fall below the upper debris, in the front side of the building, 9/11 was a fraud!!!!!! AMAZING THE PSICOPATS that have the POWER of this world, SAD and FEAR, What next???

  • That's air pressure shooting out dust and crushed drywall. Imagine the air pressure caused by 20 falling floors.

  • So all the unnecessary military and civilian deaths as a result of this "bad" evidence is chalked up to "the end justify the means"? The bullshit about babies and incubators. The Big Lie about Jessica Lynch, The Big Lie about Pat Tillman, all to get support for a war based on lies not bad evidence. no cover ups ... don't make me laugh.

  • 9/11 was not an inside job plane hit and knock out floors and once one or two floors go they all go R.I.P ALL PPL THAT LOST THEIR ESPECIALLY ALL THOSE BRAVE FIREMEN

  • @NYCJOE23 Excuse me, but we are talking about 2 massive 110 ft tall, 208 ft square, steel-reinforced concrete skyscrapers.....not a Jenga tower! You are a total idiot!

  • @apatriotofusa Correction: 110-story.....

  • @apatriotofusa And when you take out an 8 floor section with an airplane going nearly 500 miles per hour, then what? Fuckin' ponies and rainbows shoot out the sides?

    Oh that's right, those rainbows were fireballs.

  • @SUBWAYFLASHER First of all, you are perpetuating an argument regarding an event that never happened. 9/11 was a collosal HOAX. There were no. planes. There were no hijackers. No boxcutters, no cellphone calls from captive passengers.....it is all complete BULLSHIT! 9/11 was a planned, orchestrated MURDEROUS CHARADE to cow the American people into supporting a ME invasion using technology you cannot imagine. Orbs, UAV's, cloaked vehicles, holograms....This is the NWO's Orwellian agenda: CONTROL

  • @apatriotofusa the twin towers did not have concrete. just steel.

  • @chet280 I think your HEAD is full of concrete! How can you possibly make such a statement?! You obviously know absolutely NOTHING about high-rise building construction. Think before you post!

  • @apatriotofusa it sounds like you were suggesting there were made with concrete cores and concrete encased columns like most high rises are, however the world trade center was supported with steel trusses. this is what i meant. i was interpreting it like you meant that it was built like i said in my first sentence.

  • Not an inside job, it would be nice if everyone would understand that. Instead of being so obsessed with one belief and turn a blind eye to something that can prove the CD theory wrong.

    Debunkers in the other hand, gather BOTH sides opinions, then creates a debate and to see the outcome of which one is true, using supportive evidence all the time.

  • And the tower and people, was no more.

  • Umm, could you post more of this clip, please?

  • Debunkers are a strange group of trolls that band together to show an almost Orwellian allegiance to the Official Conspiracy Theory. They like to characterize “Truthers” the same way the “ Nazi Propagandists” did to draw support for their ideas by name calling and character assassination. They also like to claim they have some type of superior knowledge but are always found wanting when tested. Debunkers always believe politicians and are ready to fight to last drop of other peoples blood.

  • @CARSONB43 So? It's been 9 years & still no sign of physcial or trace evidence from Truthers to prove their disillusioned Conspiracy Theories.

  • @WhyAskQuestions  Sure, remove and or destroy evidence as fast as possible, then delay the Investigation for over a year, then stack the commission with neocon faithful.

    But they didn't do a good enough job and eventually they will all pay.

    Truther's have no reason to lie, but the neocons and their supporter have plenty.

  • @CARSONB43 Who "destroyed or removed" the evidence? Got any evidence that anyone did such a thing? No you don't!

    Will pay for what? For you having a delusional mind or for you being a bit paranoid?

    Truthers lie because they have no evidence to support their fucked up theories. 9 years later & still a fucked up mess.

  • @WhyAskQuestions a neocon butt kisser.

    There is abundant evidence that there were concerted programs to remove evidence from the three known sites of carnage on September 11th: Ground Zero in Manhattan, the west wing and lawn of the Pentagon, and the debris fields of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania. This is particularly true of the Pentagon, where a mop-up operation by officials commenced immediately after the attack.

  • @CARSONB43 Why don't you come over to James Randi Educational Forum & debate with me there? I'll hand your stupid ass to every debunker there, including Mark Roberts.

    You have no evidence to support that the evidence was removed. What you're claiming is hearsay! About Flight 93, it wasn't "shot down", Johnstown Airport doesn't have jet fighters, only apache helicopters. You have no evidence about the Pentagon or the WTCs', it's all speckulation & hearsay coming from you.

  • @WhyAskQuestions And you believe what your neocon masters tell you to, >>you are the party faithful lead blind and never questioning anything your masters tell you even though you realize they have lied in the past over and over again,but you believe that this time they are telling the truth.

  • @CARSONB43 Neo-con masters? Don't you realize how fucking stupid that really sounds coming from a degenerant like you?? Evidence proves they're tellingthe truth, I haven't seen any evidence come out of you since you started this "debate" with me. You don't know how to debate, much less show any evidence of what you claim.

    It's your problem that you haven't gotten any evidence to prove that 9/11 was an "Inside Job". Not mine or anyone elses, it's your mistake!

  • @WhyAskQuestions President McKinley told the American people that the USS Maine had been sunk in Havana Harbor by a Spanish mine. The American people, outraged by this apparent unprovoked attack, supported the Spanish American War. The Captain of the USS Maine had insisted the ship was sunk by a coal bin explosion, investigations after the war proved that such had indeed been the case. There had been no mine.

  • @CARSONB43 What does President McKinley or the Captain of the USS Maine have to do with 9/11?

  • @WhyAskQuestions President Johnson lied about the Gulf of Tonkin to send Americans off to fight in Vietnam. There were no torpedoes in the water in the Gulf. LBJ took advantage of an inexperienced sonar man's report to goad Congress into escalating the Vietnam War.

  • @CARSONB43 What does President Johnson & the Gulf of Tonkin have to do with 9/11? 

  • @WAQ The Bush/Cheney administration claimed that Iraq was involved in the crimes of 9/11. Repeatedly. This has been proven to be a lie, among many other lies by those guys. Lies that profited them and their associates. They referred to 9/11 as an 'opportunity'. It was a crime most egregious. If they lied about Iraq, then how I wonder can anyone believe what they say about anything else. These are the kind of people you believe, NeoCons.

    If can't see the connection, have an adult explain it.

  • @CARSONB43 "If can't see the connection"

    What connection with what type of evidence proves what you're claiming is the truth?

    Sources would help you! So far nothing to suggest that the Iraqis were involved with 9/11.

  • @CARSONB43 seattlepi . com / attack / 140133 _ bushiraq18 . html

    Bush said there was no attempt by the administration to try to confuse people about any link between Saddam and Sept. 11.

    "No, we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said. "What the vice president said was is that he (Saddam) has been involved with al-Qaida.

  • @CARSONB43 So you lied about Iraq being involved with 9/11. Saddam Hussien was only involved with Al-Qaeda & that he didn't have anything to do with the 9/11 Attacks.

  • @WhyAskQuestions " I lied " , Can you Prove That? More proof of how stupid you are. I only argue with you for fun, Proof of anything would be meaningless to someone of your limited intellect.

    I now agree that Popular Mechanics is the right theory for you.

  • @CARSONB43 Here's the proof of what you said when you lied: "The Bush/Cheney administration claimed that Iraq was involved in the crimes of 9/11."

    Bush only wanted Saddam because he was involved with Al-Qaeda, not the 9/11 Attacks.

  • @WhyAskQuestions, are you saying that Saddam Hussein had anything to do with Al CIAda? If you are, then you are barking fucking mad as Saddam hated all those fundamentalist nutters and kicked the shit out of them every chance he got, (and quite right too)

  • Respond to this video... Bush has tried to portray the war in Iraq as the "central front" in the war on terrorism that began with al Qaeda's September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington. 

  • @CARSONB43 The Gulf of Tonkin was nothing more than a case of mistaken identity, because there was nothing out there when a second alleged attack occured. So this proves nothing about 9/11 being an "Inside Job".

    In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick's ship's log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the "apparent ambush"—was in fact unfounded.

    Stick that in your pipe & smoke it!

  • @WhyAskQuestions RE: "In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick's ship's log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the "apparent ambush"—was in fact unfounded." You should read it again before you cut and paste ,as this article taken from wikipedia proves my point. bafoon

  • @CARSONB43 I've reread it & it clearly says in the end: "the "apparent ambush"—was in fact unfounded."

    The 2nd ambush was unfounded! Meaning that it never happened.

  • @WhyAskQuestions It was all a lie to go to war, that's what it means. just how stupid are you.

  • @WhyAskQuestions Debunkers really are a traitorous bunch of scum suckers. Not only is everything they say a complete lie, but they willingly protect those that commit crimes against their own country. Debunkers love war, as long as they don't have to fight themselves, but they will happily send other peoples children to fight their battles. All debunkers have and use multiple accounts to make it appear as if others agree with them.

    ONLY A COWARD WOULD DENY THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH.

  • @CARSONB43 So us debunkers "lie"? Really?? So what kind of evidence do you have to counter us with??? HMMMM! We love war? Well some of us do, unlike those protesting jackasses who go to Military funerals & dishonor the dead. I only have this account, you Truthers use all types of accounts when cornered with the truth.

    Only an idiot, who thinks they've found the answers with some hairbrained conspiracy theory, would choose a theory instead of denying the evidence that's in front of them.

  • @WhyAskQuestions re: " Only an idiot, who thinks they've found the answers with some hairbrained conspiracy theory, would choose a theory instead of denying the evidence that's in front of them."

    This must be some new De-bunker secret code that only makes sense after decoding with your Popular Mechanics decoder ring.

  • @CARSONB43 I never said that I believed Popular Mechanics. You just love to put words in peoples mouths who don't agree with you.

  • @WhyAskQuestions Pot calling the kettle beige?????? You're a flag waving moron.. No make that "A Fucking Moron".... 

  • @CARSONB43 I believe 9-11 was an outside job, and I am against any war. I have just debunked your assumption.

  • @Dalez8JR say's the sock puppet account..

  • @CARSONB43 maybe truthers just dont accept facts when they're presented to them.

  • @CARSONB43 I used to be a conspiracy theorist until i did my own research and realized myself that the evidence was taken the wrong way or taken out of context with every theory. At this point i can see that you just don't want to believe any evidence that points away from what you believe. You want to believe the government is behind this, so every conspiracy theory you hear that sounds believable will be thrown into conversation later to make you sound interesting, just like a teenage gossip.

  • @wiislotmaker you still are, you just believe the "official conspiracy theory". as for sounding interesting, you thought so or you would not have made a comment 6 month after my post. interesting!

  • @CARSONB43 ROFL, you're an idiot. 911 was an outside job. There was no massive government conspiracy, get over it...the truth is your leaders have abandoned you as their cash cow is drying up (except for nutball alex jones).

    Steven Jones - AKA Mr. Thermite - has moved on to "man generated earthquake energy weapons".

    Luke Rudkowski - kicked out of WeAreChange after being caught embezzling all their money

    Korey Rowe - producer Loose Change - arrested dealing Heroin

    David Ray Griffin - hiding

  • @Oz1976 so say's the sock puppet account..... fools like you are the real danger to America you get your info from the same people selling you the endless war on terror. You blindly believe everything they tell you and then you act like a parrot repeating it like a fool to anyone stupid enough to listen,so peddle your bullshit to someone else.

  • @CARSONB43 Wrong. I get my information from scientists, they're in on it too? Do you realize how large this so-called conspiracy would have to be in order for your paranoid delusions to be true. Dude, stupid? I guarantee you listen to Alex Jones...nuff said. Dumbass. "Sock puppet" oh noes, some idiot twoofer who can't find his ass from a hole in the wall called me a puppet...get over it twat...there is no conspiracy. 911 was an OUTSIDE job.

  • @Oz1976 according to you 19 hijackers led by a guy in a cave in Afghanistan managed to get norad to stand down then successfully hijack 4 planes, crash two into skyscrapers knocking down three buildings,flying one like a jet fighter into the pentagon without get caught on 80 or more camera's. I think your the real conspiracy theorist. I guarantee you read popular mechanics while you watch your "scientists" on Fox news.

  • @CARSONB43 Led by a guy in a cave? Are you blind, stupid or racist, which is it? He was NOT in a cave when he planned these attacks nor was he in a cave this past month when we killed him. He, and Al'qaeda had free reign of Afghanistan you ignorant dolt. They weren't living in caves. Only after we invaded and after the siege of Tora Bora did they flee to the mountains. Again, this 80 camera nonsense, please post proof of these 80 cameras. The Pentagon is not a fort, it's an office building.

  • @Oz1976 Wasn't it your pal Rumsfeld who said OBL was hiding in an Elaborate Cave System in Afghanistan.

    How do you know where he was when he allegedly planned this crime? Why wouldn't he plan his evil attack against freedom in his secret lair. Are you saying that that rummy lied? Do your own research on the camera's

    start with the FOIA to release all 85. Blind stupid racist ignorant dolt describes you perfectly but let me add sycophant with a predilection for irrelevancy.

  • @CARSONB43 That was AFTER WE INVADED! What part of that don't you comprehend? How do I know where he was? Easy, go watch all the Richard Clarke interviews from 1998 to 2002, ya know, the head national security guy for both Clinton and Bush who both ignored his warnings about OBL and Al'qaeda.

    No see, it's you that has to post sourced material to prove a "fact". It's called, the burden of proof. Ad hominems are all you have. I have the facts on my side dipshit.

  • @Oz1976 So they just built their elaborate cave system after the invasion, I see and Clark knew where Osama was the whole time? ah huh, and you don't like argumentum ad hominem .but of course you use it constantly. I see that you also demand facts and sources and yet provide none yourself save the ramblings of a parrot trained to regurgitate on command. If all your official conspiracies theories were correct it would mean that you live in the most incompetently run country in the world.

  • @Oz1976 The part I don't comprehend is how you can believe everything they tell you when you know they lie about everything all the time. your history is full of it and come to think of it so are you, dipshit!

  • @CARSONB43 Dude I was there that day. I lost 3 friends in those towers, 1 was a first responder. Our "history being full of lies" is just rhetoric, and no, I'm not. You are. It's funny you're so caught up in the US yet you say "your history" acting the part that you're not an american, I bet that you are huh? Who's lying? Oh and I bet there's a whole shitstorm you don't comprehend...like physics, chemistry, seismographs, metallurgy, collapse mechanics... FIRE

    

  • @Oz1976 Sorry for your loss. But it changes nothing, you believe a conspiracy theory sold to you by those who profit the most from it. I am not an American. But you can think I am if you like as it seems that's somehow important to you.

  • @CARSONB43 No no...I believe a scientificly tested hypothesis and theory...YOU believe a CONSPIRACY THEORY...sold to yo by Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe, Jason Bermas, Luke rudkowski, Richard Gage, Jim Fetzer, Judi Wood, etc..they're making money off this shit. Not me, not any other debunker. The REAL Conspiracy, is the Profiteering of these assholes selling misinformation and lies in the guise of truth. You're wrong.

  • @Oz1976 10 years and I have purchased nothing from any of them, as a matter of fact most if not all of their media is available for free, so AGAIN your completely wrong. You however have paid dearly with the loss of your rights and freedoms. It wasn't terrorist that took them it was your government.

  • @CARSONB43 Sorry, I lost no rights or freedoms. I'm neither a criminal or a terrorist, the only difference in my life is a little more security at airports when I fly from JFK to Tampa Intl. Oh no, I'm getting violated /sarcasm

    It doesn't matter that you didn't buy anything from them. Others did.

    Alex Jones - makes his sole living off propogating conspiracy nonsense

    Steven Jones - $25 for his thermite dvds, 75-100 for his "lectures"

    Dick Gage - $70,000 a year from ae911truth

    continued.

  • @Oz1976 What about these:

    FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror investigation.

    RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.

    RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them

  • @CARSONB43 I

    1. I'm not a terrorist, so I have no fear of this, though I can see how terrorist apologists might be scared of it, along with the lunatic fringe.

    2. No they can't...misinformation, or flat out lie.

    3. Wrong again.

    (unless you're a terrorist - then you should be afraid)

  • @Oz1976

    1. When your stopped tell them that. 2. U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit backed the president's power to indefinitely detain a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil without any criminal charges, 3. Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them. Patriot TWO is directed at Americans especially those who are sympathetic to the middle east. 

  • @CARSONB43 You should go read up on what you're talking about...seriously, stop taking it from Alex Jones mouth.

  • @Oz1976 You must be in love with Alex Jones it's all you ever talk about, How do you know so much about AJ if you don't tune in to his show? You are wrong as usual, no surprise there, like most Americans you have only your "news interpreted versions" of what the patriot acts 1 & 2 really mean. Hell most of your congress never even read it before they signed it.

  • @CARSONB43 He's the most vocal of your dwindling minority. Sorry, I've read the entire patriot act, it's currently being debated in the congress as we speak, a simple google search would tell you that...it's more than likely going to be severely diminished. Oh, and it's the Republicans (Bush's party) doing the diminishing, while the Dems want to strengthen it. Aside of that, the points remain. 911 was an outside job, deal with it.

  • @Oz1976 Well then how was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?

  • @CARSONB43 United 93 was delayed 50 minutes from takeoff from Newark. Andrews and Langley both scrambled fighters, they sent them to NY. He failed to land, he took off just fine, he was also a certified commercial pilot, all of those truther statements are taken out of context, go watch the full interviews with the flight school instructors. It wasn't an aerobatic maneuver, that's hyperbole. Why are you using what's known as a strawman, changing subject to try and trip me up. You can't.

  • @Oz1976 your answer is a joke you didn't even attempt an answer just avoidance,a major debunker tactic.

  • @CARSONB43 What? I didn't avoid shit, you're just too fucking stupid to understand. The only part I didn't answer was the side he hit, I ran out of room. Why would the "inside jobbers" destroy the most recently renovated section that cost millions? Do me a favor, you're so sure of yourself. Do this:

    1. Declare a clear, complete and concise theory/hypothesis of ALL that days events.

    2. Include ALL primaries, secondaries and any unknowing participants

    3. Must be supported with evidence

  • @CARSONB43 (cont)

    Dylan Avery - 4 editions of Loose Change, An American Coup currently available through Best Buy and Amazon. Went from low tech Purchase Film School Reject, to plasma's in his "office".

    Luke Rudkowski - embezzled 10's of 1000's from WeAreChange, paid off his college tuition with said money

    Korey Rowe - prodcuer of Loose Change, Army Deserter, busted seling HEROIN in Jan/Feb

    Judy Wood - New Book - Where Did the Towers Go - 40 bucks each

    David Ray Griffin - 13 Books on 911

  • @Oz1976 I'm sure Popular Mechanics, Pen and Teller, MythBusters, Rolling Stone, Nation, American Thinker, all made money trying {unsuccessfully} to debunk theories. Just to name a few...

  • @CARSONB43 My biggest question is: why do the opinions of *usually* socially maladjusted internet "warriors" outweigh the opinions of 10,000s of qualified experts who more or less agree with the official story? Dont you think that these people would be raising hell if there was a reason to? Good lord. Yes, its important to ask questions, but to continually do so in the face of overwhelming professional consensus when you have no real expertise in anything is just plain ignorant and childish.

  • @philritter21 Let's see... 3 buildings... two planes .....near free fall speed of collapse.... pyroclastic flows......no plane in pentagon video......John Farmer, Jr., senior counsel to the Commission stated that the Commission "discovered that...what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue." ......Also I do not subscribe to consensus politics.

  • @CARSONB43 Again, you just spew the same stuff that has been said a 1000 times over in the past 10 years. Things like "near free fall" are nothing more than buzzwords that youve heard from others and repeat yourself with little understanding. And again, I want to stress, since you cant quite seem to grasp the concept, that although skepticism is important, it turns to ignorance when you and your friends with nothing more than youtube videos insist that the experts are wrong. Its like a religion

  • @philritter21 Thousands of Architects and Engineers agree with me, who you got? Bush,Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld... all proven liars. Idiots like YOU have what is known as cognitive dissonance. That is why you can't help yourself from coming on you tube and responding to comments made 11 month ago. Grasp this concept ..You've been lied to.... Get a life you Troll.

  • @CARSONB43 Dude I love how you called him a troll when it's people like you who troll through 9/11 videos regurgitating the same crap you "learned" or "researched" from Michael Moore or those tweens who made "Loose Change" ..... Here's one thing that you haven't considered ...if the government wanted to keep this "conspiracy" under wraps, you self proclaimed saviors would be the first to disappear. funny how it's been 10 years and you guys are still here lol

  • @615guitarplayer -The regurgitation is by Official Conspiracy Theorists as is demonstrated by your predilection for irrelevancy. You might want to consider that the people who threaten your rights and freedoms are your elected officials. The no fly list, the patriot act, the tsa, the never ending wars, banker bailouts..... the list goes on. How many terrorist plots does the FBI have to create and then save you from before you wake up? Your self proclaimed saviors were Bush & Co. You bought that.

  • @CARSONB43 you presented the same crap that is brought up by every conspiracy theorist uses, "the spider web of evil that grips our government". It's amazing how people believe that this is true and that the "no fly list, patriot act, tsa, wars, and banker bailouts" are part of this huge conspiracy. If I wanted to be led around by someone who sees or "discovers" a conspiracy by misquoting and misleading the words of those who were there then I'd watch Michael Moore films and/or Loose Change lol

  • @615guitarplayer and you present the same crap that every would be debunka nut uses. Who said it's all part of a conspiracy? It's a term your side uses. The fake war on terror run by bankers and wall st is what grips your government. Even as they rob your country blind and engage in endless war you see no problem.

    Your already "led around" by your main stream media but do not realize it. Your elite love a good war as long as the can send other peoples children to fight it.

  • @CARSONB43 Slippery Slope man....if there's one thing that I've realized from reading and watching the crap people like you present its that if one thing is in dispute (such as the WMD issue) then there's got to be some massive cover up. Bad evidence was presented to the high brass of our government in regards to Iraq but lets stop and take a look at what the end result was....we took out a tyrant who believe it or not has a history of killing his own people. It's as simple as that; no cover up

  • @philritter21 Thousands of Architects and Engineers agree with me, who you got? Bush,Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld... all proven liars. Idiots like YOU have what is known as cognitive dissonance. That is why you can't help yourself from coming on you tube and responding to comments made 11 month ago. Grasp this concept ..You've been lied to.... Get a life you Troll.

  • @CARSONB43 Haha wow. This is just getting embarrassing for you. Sources for this claim about engineers? Maybe you mean the petition where there are currently only 1500 or so signatures from people with architectural and engineering background? Out of nearly 1.5 million in our country alone? Oh yeah great argument. 1 out of every 1000 want further investigation. And me get a life? I wish that you were smart enough to look at the last 10 years of your life and grasp the irony. Pathetic, really.

  • @CARSONB43 ok well no one takes your THEORIES seriously because everything you have claimed has been disproven

  • @XxxxExclusivexxxX Thanks for your authoritative response, now that that's all cleared up by your well documented fact filled comment I feel fully debunked. Should you feel it necessary to further enlighten us with more of your fascinating rhetoric please by all means do so, as I, and others no doubt await your incite. With just one comment you have saved us years of arguing back and forth. Wow

  • @CARSONB43 gimme a week ill make a video btw you forgot the main point of my argument. all conspiracy theories have been disproven

  • @XxxxExclusivexxxX By definition the Official Story is a conspiracy Theory..... And BTW debunking by retards who only parrot the official theory is not debunking it's cheer leading.

  • @CARSONB43 Ok I am Iñigo from Basque country (Spain, Europe) I am not a muslim, and I am more white than you "probably", 9/11 was a FRAUD, here, in the moon, and in another galaxies aswell man. Wake up:

    Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li

  • @Inigo37 PLEASE REREAD MY COMMENTS

    9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

  • @theswallowfan Doesn't prove that a CD occured with WTC7. Quote mining isn't evidence to prove a CD. Fail!

  • WhyAskQuestionsm is the last of a dying breed.

    Recent Tower #7 data (including NIST's own report) makes things clear. NIST did admit freefall descent of Building #7 in their final report. BTW freefall/not free fall is a strawman.

    Disinfoshills (like WhyAskQuestions) use the tools of endless argument and diversionary topics. People that wish to know the truth will see it if they look closely. Shills don't argue to inform, or to learn themselves, but to keep you here.

  • @theswallowfan Free fall doesn't prove that WTC7 was a CD.

    Truthers (like theswallowfan) doesn't have any physcial or trace evidence of what they claim to be proven true. Truthers can't handle th truth that they're a bunch of wasted space on the internet. They think they're "smart", but they're actually pretty fucking stupid. They attack gullible people, very much like themselves, and persuade them with all of these crazy lame brained Conspiracy Theories that don't have any evidence 4 them.

  • WhyAskQuestions is a dying breed (9/11 official government story apologists)

  • @theswallowfan Truthers are Terrorists apologists! You people deny the existence of Al-Qaeda & assume the 9/11 was a "Gov. Op.". I guess you retards never understood who attacked the WTC in 1993, it wasn't the Gov.

  • go play with your lego blocks, and as for the 'roid, you caught that trying to pull your head out of Bush's ass.

  • @CARSONB43 Bush is out of office! So it's you that needs to pull your head outta your own ass. Now do me a big favor you irritating hemroid, get lost!

  • @CARSONB43 Yeah and you totally suck at not showing evidnce that 9/11 was an "Inside Job". 9 yrs of failed education on your part, you nutcase.

  • @CARSONB43 A Truthers "job" is to act retarded, think that they're intelligent & then try to explain every single conspiracy theory without a single piece of evidence to prove them. You want alot of nonsense? You Truthers can't even decide which theories are the best & you guys fight over them like dogs. Us debunkers are well organized & very efficent @ solving the simplest of conspiracy theories because we actually do research, unlike you Truthers who don't research a damn thing!

  • @WhyAskQuestions everyone that reads your comments knows your full of shit.That you play with lego blocks,and Popular Mechanics is where you get ALL your information.

  • @CARSONB43 That's a lie! If everyone knows that I'm "full of shit" then how come your the only nitwit respoding to me? Lego blocks don't have thermite or explosives on them! Popular Mechanics isn't where I get all my information. You really need to get out of your basement & lose some weight. I recomend Jenny Craig!

  • @WhyAskQuestions Prove a steel structure such as the WTC can be imploded by an airplane striking it.

    Show one piece of evidence that proves that can happen.

    Show one piece of physical evidence that is not disputed that proves the Official THEORY is true. With all the video footage of three steel structures

    imploding and falling at near free fall speed, only fools or liars would deny the truth. Your history is as flawed as you are.

  • @CARSONB43 I can prove that the plane went through the outter columns & then exploded inside the building causing a massive uncontrolled fire on mulitple floors.

    It did happen, you just choose to ignore it like a good little 9/11 TM Sheep!

    The 9/11 Conspiracy Theories prove that the OT is true in every sense!

    120 mph is free fall speed you doofus! The WTCs' never reached 120 mph when they collapsed. I'm not flawed, it's your retarded thinking that's flawed. You are a fucked up fool!

  • @CARSONB43 Newtons Law of Gravity Formula with air and structural resistance: F=G,M,M2xD2 divided by AR (air resistance). x SR (structural resistance)= No Free Fall Speed.

    You don't know anything about this formula nor will you fully understand it! That's why you're a LOSER!

  • @WAQ Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time(squared)

    or 2 x Distance = Gravity x Time(squared)

    Time(squared) = (2 x Distance) / Gravity

    Time(squared) = 2710 / 32 = 84.7

    Time = 9.2

    So our equation tells us that it will take 9.2 seconds to free-fall to the ground from the towers' former height.

    On page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we are told, in the government's "complete and final report" of 9/11, that the South Tower "collapsed" in 10 seconds. That leaves 0.8 seconds for air resistance.

  • @CARSONB43 9.2 seconds for the OUTTER COLUMNS to fall & hit the ground. That's what they're talking about, they never said anything about the inner columns cause it took longer because of air & structural resistance inside the buildings. Not only air resistance, but structural resistance as well.

    You're learning!

  • @WhyAskQuestions A bunch of double talk and gobbledygook, your favorite language. You'll Never learn.

  • @CARSONB43 Really? Then why haven't you debunked Newton's equation, or is it to hard for you to do that? Why do you say it's "Double talk & gobbledygook" when you don't understand the equation? I know, because you have nothing to counter it, that's why. You must've failed miserabily at school!

  • @CARSONB43 F=G,M,M2xD2 divided by AR (air resistance). x SR (structural resistance)= No Free Fall Speed.

    You don't understand the equation & you never will!

    120 mph is terminal velocity & is free fall speed. The WTCs' never reached that speed & it would be impossible from 1,300 foot structures along with air & structural resistance.

    You will never understand that either! That's why you're a retard, cause you can't learn!

  • @WhyAskQuestions you get a lot of miles out of an equation you don't really understand, as your comments prove. Tell us more troll, we laugh at you.

  • @CARSONB43 Oh really? So you would have stupid people believe, like yourself, that air & structural resistance wasn't there when those towers collapsed? Laws of Physics says otherwise!

    No, you're laughing at yourself for being the idiot that you truely are!

  • @WhyAskQuestions each of your comments proves again and again that you are too ignorant to understand this topic, cutting and pasting the same formula with no understanding at all.

  • @CARSONB43 You're the 1 going around saying that you have evidence that could prove 9/11 was an "Inside Job" & fail to show it anyone. You're the ignorant 1 my little twisted friend!

  • Respond to this video...As the official report states ---the south tower collapsed in 10 seconds, that's 0.8 seconds slower than free fall. but your too stupid to get it. Is it your claim that the Official 9/11 report is a lie?

  • @CARSONB43 "10 seconds, that's 0.8 seconds slower than free fall." Double talk from an idiot who claims that free fall happened then says it didn't happen. :roll eyes: The evidence shows that the Official report isn't a lie. And I know you don't have any evidence to counter with. Alot of talk & no evidence is what you're best at!

  • @WhyAskQuestions More proof that your retarded. And no point arguing the facts since you can't read or understand anything. You have no proof of anything you say because there is no proof, just more lies from the same group that brought you the last nine years worth of lies.

    Imagine a "fireman" that thinks kerosene melts steel.

    A sudodebunker who can't do simple math.

    An idiot who's only response is to demand proof and yet excepts the Official conspiracy blindly.

  • @CARSONB43 "More proof that your retarded."

    You would know about retardation how? Unless you are a retard!

    "you can't read or understand anything."

    Kind of like you when you can't read the evidence provided to you!

    "You have no proof of anything."

    Then where's your evidence, hmmm?

    "just more lies from the same group"

    Really, I'm pretty sure we have alot of evidence to prove the batshit CTs from loser Truthers.

  • @CARSONB43 "Imagine a "fireman" that thinks kerosene melts steel."

    Baseless accusations based on pure bred bullshit with no evidence!

    BTW: It takes 2,600* F to melt steel, kerosene doesn't do that, it softens & degrades the steel microscopically. Of course, you don't know shit about fire science, so you lose, again!

  • @WhyAskQuestions Each tower was designed to survive the impact and fire from a collision by a 707-340 carrying 23,000 gallons of fuel. The similar- sized 767-200s that hit the towers were each carrying about 10,000 gallons of fuel. Since jet fuel (kerosene) boils easily and its vapors ignite easily, it burns off rapidly. FEMA admits the fuel must have been used up within "a few minutes". Thereafter the fires burned fuels similar to those in ordinary office fires.

  • @CARSONB43 You forget, that was late 1970's standards at the time. Times have changed & so have planes & jet fuel.

  • @WhyAskQuestions There is no evidence that, even at their hottest immediately after the impacts, the fires approached the 700 degrees C required to significantly soften steel. Note that softening of steel by high temperatures is reversible, and that steel is a good conductor of heat. If any structural steel had lost strength in the first minutes of the fires, it would have regained most of it as the fires cooled after consuming the jet fuel.

  • @CARSONB43 They reached 2,000*F to soften it. Actually when heated to a high temperature, like the WTC steel, once cooled the steel would be brittle microscopically.

    You still need to learn a few things!

  • @WhyAskQuestions Such temperatures would have caused regions of the building to glow red hot in broad daylight. The oxygen-starved fires likely remained below 400 degrees C, and would be harmless to the steel frame even in the absence of insulation. Tell us how the fire could possibly have reached 2000 *F. for long enough to weaken the steel? Show us your equations.

  • @CARSONB43 You never read about burning metal? They weren't "oxygen starved" fires, at the 70 to 90 floor mark, there would be PLENTY of air feeding the flames. As indicated by the smoke cloud, which was blowing in a southern direction.

    You have any idea what's in an office building that could feed the fires to 2,000*F. There's no equations to be made, it's just logic & reason!

  • @WhyAskQuestions If thick black smoke is characteristic of an oxygen-starved, lower temperature, less intense fire, why was thick black smoke exiting the WTC towers when the fires inside were supposed to be extremely hot?

  • @CARSONB43 Right, and you would have stupid people, very much like yourself, believe that the WTCs' fell at the speed of 120 mph. You're a retard!

  • A quick read of Whyaskquestions comments proves he is not the least bit interested in the truth. Only arguments.

  • @CARSONB43 yep pretty much, just a disgruntled person in life stirring s**t for tthe sake of it. Zero thought and effort to understand what's being postulated, just straight out "Don't ask questions about anything or your psychologically flawed". I mean wouldn't you think now with 1400 professionals it would be worth looking at for the sake of it, it costs nothing to do so in relative terms. To not ask is criminal in this case it started an imperialistic war at tax payers expense and lives.

  • @Baldwynmayhem Most people would agree

  • whyaskquestions is an internet troll and a disinfo agent. dont waste your time with scum.

  • @CARSONB43 Poor baby! Carson, you haven't provided evidence that 9/11 was an "Inside Job" in almost a year. So who'se the disinfo agent, troll & scum? It could only be you!

  • @WhyAskQuestions And you haven't provided evidence that it wasn't, so what's your point? Your still arguing via personal post (5-6 now getting quite boring tbh) with me, and yet YOU have provided absolutely no reason, why questions shouldn't be asked or answered. Just YOUR unfounded personal take and linking it to psychological problems, how fricken pathetic is that argument, sheer stupidity shown and displayed. No wonder America is fucked right now with people like you there,

  • @Baldwynmayhem You don't have evidence to prove my blog wrong. America has nukes you moron, whatdoes you country have? Probably pee shooters!

  • @WhyAskQuestions its still you , a lying , disinfo agent, and pure scum.

  • @CARSONB43 You have no evidence so what's that saying to everyone about you? The same exact thing!

  • @WhyAskQuestions evidence is not what your looking for, never has been. Arguing and name calling are the tools you use. Your videos are all nonsense as are your comments.

  • @CARSONB43 Actually its you that;s not looking for evidence. So don't play this blame game on me you fucking asshole. Yeah, well your editted videos don't prove shit & they don't have any evidence. You're nothing but a fucking moron & a fraud. Go fuck yourself you fucking lunatic!

  • @WhyAskQuestions whats the matter , the truth hurts. PS, I love it when you prove my point. your very very small minded. Are you going to threaten me next?

  • @CARSONB43 The truth that you being a retard & imbicile doesn't hurt me, it just makes me feel good to know that you're making yourself to be a jackass rather for me showing that you're a jackass. Saves me time! Thanks for making yourself out to be a jackass. You have no evidence, all you can do is type up non-sense & accuse people for something they never committed & you think you're the victim? Well you're not! I don't have to threaten you, you've pretty much threatened yourself by being dumb.

  • @WhyAskQuestions go play with your lego blocks, your too easy!

  • @CARSONB43 And you're too fucked up in the head! Do you take illegal drugs or something to trip out like you always do?

  • @WhyAskQuestions Do you still beat your wife? Have you recovered from your nervous breakdown?

  • @CARSONB43 Oh the things you don't know about my personal life. If I had a wife I'd make sure she didn't act like you. You're the 1 with the nervous breakdown, still can't get over it that you have no evidence to prove anything you say about 9/11 & you're getting pissed. BTW: You are a drug addict, I know!

  • @CARSONB43 Getting pissed off yet? I see that you are! Good, let the hate flow through you, let go your anger!

  • @WhyAskQuestions I see now your a sith, oh wait I misspelled, that should be "shit" let that flow through you, it should be easy for you seeing as your an asshole.

  • @CARSONB43 If I'm an "asshole" as you claim that I am, then you're that damn hemroid that's stuck to my ass giving me grief. I think some Preperation E (evidence) should cure your paranoia!

  • @WhyAskQuestions Where is your evidence WAQ? You have none yourself, whereas a bunch of prefessionals in the engineering field have, are you mental? Seems that way. You are calling out the people on this side of the argument that have the evidence you don't have to support your argument. Your a chimp seriously. Do you jump up and down and go beserk when you see your own reflection in the mirror?

  • @Baldwynmayhem Seriously you've got more problems than I do. You say you're an engineer. Ok then, what would a judge say to you in the Supreme Court about you proving that the buildings on 9/11 were CDed & he asked you for evidence? Then if you dodged the judge when he asked you questions, you'd lose the case becaue you failed to provide physcial evidence of the crime. It's not my career that's on the line, it's yours you dumbass. I bet you don't talk about 9/11 with your boss!

  • @CARSONB43 Ahh hell yes, I doubt a disinformant, just another human that hasn't evolved with others, plain and simple that cbf asking questions about life or otherwise. And get this, doesn't believe that certain individuals band together to manipulate other people in any way shape or form, fricken hilarious. That is the core of humanity sadly on so many levels.

  • @Baldwynmayhem For an engineer that don't know shit, you take the cake!

  • @WhyAskQuestions who says you? geezuz you got smashed verbally by me behind the scenes have blocked me from commenting and you have the audacity to call other people out over the same thing. Also you have no evidence at all for your cause, all you do is repeat the same dribble over and over. Thing is I'm merely saying it's worth checking due to possible descrepancy, which is scientific method. You oppose the scientific method which is the only Real quantifiable method we have on earth.

  • @Baldwynmayhem I didn't "smashed" by you because you haven't proven that 9/11 was an "Inside Job" with evidence. Talk all you want you wannabe engineer, I know that what comes out your thoughts is utter lies.

  • @WhyAskQuestions yes you were, so much so you blocked me from commenting, you didn't