@STUDIOMACLEOD listen you stupid dishonest fucken moron, taking this video from another youtube user and using it to spread your bull shit is the lowest you can go as a human when it comes to trust and honesty. This VIDEO FOR ALL OF YOU TO KNOW COMES FROM THEFAKINGHOAXSTER. NOTICE AT THE TOP left of the video you can clearly see why there is a patch there, he is covering the original uploaders name. If I met you in person dude I aint even lying I would fuck your ass up, for being a POS.
@Happyturtlebeach If you were capable of writing an intelligent comment, rather than a cursory dismissal, you might have the nouse to question, research and ascertain what hardware you are observing is such proximity to Mars. Without such information you look idle.
@warlock242 Actually I would know, since aerospace engineering is my field of work. Actually everyone would know if we had the capability or the funds to go to Mars. If humanity accomplished something like that, it would not fall under the radar as much as you propose. That's just common sense.
@Happyturtlebeach I mean imagine all those people who spent their whole lives accomplishing something so great and then none hear about it except in this mildly amusing video. That's like that conspiracy that humanity never walked on the moon, I think it's just nonsense.
@Happyturtlebeach but that's only if they went public. easy as that. the gov could spend money on something and we wouldn't be the wiser. its at a too grand a scale to notice. tell me; would you notice you were missing 800,000,000 or whatever amount of $ at that amount went missing? no you wouldn't so you cant dismiss that they could have simply just not told us (and our gov is known to do that)
A VERY VERY nice try. If it wasn't for Victoria crater, and polar cap (from Mariner 9 or Viking orbiter) footage, it could have looked quite convincing. Only Stanley Kubrick would have made it better (but with much bigger budget);-).
Did you8 get permission from NASA to use the MRO HiRISE of Victoria Crater in your video as well as Viking Orbiter imagery of the rest of Mars? I will sned NASA the link to this copyright infringement. Imafes are to be used for ligitimate purposes only, not in fake videos.
I really like people who speculate on things they have no idea what rocks the boat. To go to mars first we need parameters for mars landing, mars surviving and mars blast off. Like we had for the moon before they landed it.
When you're next to a giant source of reflecting light, yeah, it actually will.
It appears you do not know how light works. Stars are billions or trillions of miles away. When you're 40 feet from the moon, your local light source will render distant dim stars invisible.
WOW .. if anyone finds out if this is real footage or not , i dont care what year ... please let me kno if this is authentic,,, cuz it looks real .. and it looks like mars ... and i want to know the truth ... unless is another hoax like the first moon landing or something .. but this time kept in silence and the footage was intentionally "leaked" or somethin .. too much BS around
@sergiuchirita17 wait you think the first moon landing was faked? I kinda just stumble on this video by accident but do you really think the first moon landing or any of them for that matter was faked...not that you can't believe what you want but I don't think there is enough evidence to disprove ANY of the moon landings.
@IIIIandrew im pretty sure it was faked .. there are documentaries about how exactly they faked it , if u wanna see for urself ... but since then , i think there were at least 1 landing on the moon .. but was few years latter
This is the real deal. In frame 0:23 the image is of the Acidalia region with the Lunae Planum region at 10 o'clock. at 0: 36 is the image of the astronaut.?? 0:42 is the Tharsis region at 160 Longitude. 0:55 is the Valles Marineris region. 1:16 is the south polar caps.1:26 is close up of Valles.Frame 1:44 is the north polar region. 1:46 is Victoria Crater. If this is real it is such a historic revelation!!
This is the real deal. In frame 0:23 the image is of the Acidalia region with the Lunae Planum region at 10 o'clock. at 0: 36 is the image of the astronaut.?? 0:42 is the Tharsis region at 160 Longitude. 0:55 is the Valles Marineris region. 1:16 is the south polar caps.1:26 is close up of Valles.Frame 1:44 is the north polar region. 1:46 is Victoria Crater. If this is real it is such a historic revelation!!
how would it land on mars considering it needs flat land for a landing i mean u cant just land in the air or stop in the air u can slow down but not come to a stop you'd get hurt.
we never NEVER went to the moon so how could we get to mars?? you see theres this thing called the van allen radiation belt which is impossible to cross and anything that tried, died. this is rediculous and you people are really gullable if you think that men went to the moon let alone mars., and the footage of the beast that goes through the ground on the mars video has a smack of the movie critters on it, its fraudulent obvious and sad!!
I can tell you this. If the story, that they went to map ancient ET archaeology, is why they went, then it is fake. Mars has a plethora of cities, structures and craft that are still manned. NASA manipulates i's images to hide this. it is the same with the Moon of Earth. I have the proof, so readers, don't worry about 'dissing' my claim, I am working on a video to prove it, as I have found a way to remove their trickery.
its already known that during the moon missions they had fiber optic tech for the cam still classified to this day, that craft reminds me of space lab and parts of the ISS and during the shot you see a white guy looks to be and astronaut but good job on this one ......looks REAL.......?????
I havent watched the video yet, just reading the comments i can see how blind some people already are!! wether this turns out to be fake or real isnt my point though, my point is the military/NASA has always been 30 years ahead ofthe public technology wise, remember they had stealth bombers in vietnam but i bet some of you though they were built in `91?!! its not unrealistic to think that any good footage from the 70s is fake due to clarity when its obvious they would only use the best camera!
4) Smudges on the window glass that never seen again.
5) The outside of the craft looks superimposed to me, no ware for a sharp far spot to be seen.
6) Zooming into the planet has an effect on the planet's image but not on the crafts outside components. Also the focal point of that craft branch is on closer components than the far out ones, and yet the planet gets in focus.
@DarrrrenCullllen The latest I heard was we did go to the moon- but we were show fake footage- or something to that effect??? Some people know- some think they know- others just want to know
@metaltaint20 Neither does the moon. It's the Earth that has Van Allen belts of radiation because of our magnetic field, any mission to Mars would have to pass through them also.
@DarrrrenCullllen i see youve gone off subject, i said nothing about the vehicle that went to mars nor mentioned it i just said the shuttle was protected for a moon mission not the lander
@metaltaint20 During the mission to the moon, the crew spent the majority of the journey in the command module, which had much greater protection from radiation, not the lunar lander (the section made from 'tin foil') They only transferred to the lunar module before landing on the moon. Their trajectory to the moon was also designed to avoid the most intense areas of the van allen belt.
nobody has been on the moon or mars. there is to much radiation, they would fry. How come the astronouts aren't the slightest bit effected by the powerful radiation that sorrounds us?
Time frame to 0:37..when there's a white flash...go beck on it...and try seeing it...the man is holding some kind of device in his hand and he appears to be inside a space craft...looking at the beck ground..
Fuck it's real...I time framed every pice of this video...and I saw a man...in the reflection dressed in white...taking the fucking video..this is unbelievable....omg...!!!!!! Everyone should no about this!!!!!!!!!!
@RichardGait I paused at the exact second of the astronaut he is defiantly dressed like a astronaut thick black hair eyebrows large nose and holding papers very interesting
I paused at the exact second of the astronaut he is defiantly dressed like a astronaut thick black hair eyebrows large nose and holding papers very interesting
hey studio could you stabelize this video? youtube has that feature in the video editor now. maybe with a still camera we could get a better feel of the video. From what i see so far im torn. What shuttle did they use to get there? Im not stupid i know our gov has toys weve never seen nor heard of. Im sayin space travel within distance is possible. theres alot more goin on then what our gov tells us
1:46 That is Victoria Crater, is 750 meters across, you just couldn't see it that big from low mars orbit, that is only a picture made recently and putted as background when a space station/ship model was filmed on green screen.
you guys keep on saying that back in the 70's we didnt have the video technology that was of this quality.. but should i remind you that if we really indeed made it to mars then we obviously had technology that the world was not aware of at that time.
Yeah right. They went to victoria creator that is 100m wide and it takes up the whole window? So they are orbiting within atmosphere justa few hundred meters off the ground? If you belive this you are a dumb shit.
The reason the poster has put a watermark over "a certain logo" we'd all "remember" is because this is a video done by The Faking Hoaxer....its a hoax people. Check out his version....the footage shown here comes from the last part of of it.
Some of them were probably Earth places,just saw it? It was an station! It probably was MIR or ISS. I dont belive there would be that "good" technology camera in that year. I am not mars proffesional, but i dont belive mars got clouds like us. There are some gases but not like ours. Next : I wont belive some who will be first on mars would do that fast close ups and downs of mars. Next, WHERE ARE STARS?
Well at the few last seconds, WHO WILL SEND MIR TO ORBIT MARS? Fake better next time.
In my opinion, if NASA had sent astronauts in orbit around Mars in the 1970's, even with secret mission objectives they would have said something. That would have been a great achievement.
If you look closely, parts of the spacecraft resemble the ISS viewed from a docked Soyuz. I'm just looking forward to read Joe's expert opinion. Whatever the truth, this is a really good video.
as a Los Angeles professional film compressionist, i am looking for signs this was from a film source, as the definition is too great to have been 1970's video. I would like to examine the original file that was uploaded so I can step through it frame by frame, but from a cursory investigation, I would guess this film was shot after 1995, based on it's porperties.
@joebartone Hi Joe, if you're interested in doing an email interview please contact us through uforadar.com. If this is fake we'd love to have a professional like you blow it away with real insight. Thanks
try writing my through my website theloniousdub. com
I would be happy to help discuss the media and file. I can give my opinion on the metadata but I am not a UFO expert - just a digital media assets specialist
I worked for Technicolor, Ascent Media, and now full time at Crest Digital.
@joebartone compression for that time, isnt it also impossible to man a mission to mars then also ;) Just a thought. We dont know a 10 th of what they know about science and technology.
No offence to your professional exp. but if the gov. is able to conceal stuff like this (as well as many other things) do you not thing that even if they had the technology back then they would release it to the general public? i'm still curios to know what you may have found considering it's a year later...
if we assume that this video is genuine we can safely assume that secrecy towards technology is real, witch might explain the high-tech video equippment and quality :)
@joebartone LOL U could almost catch the toy man lmao.lol and the camera is bigger thin the window.lol.the toys arms were up foward like all toy .lol.If Ur a L,A Professional film compressionist,U must have thought E.T was a real footage and not a Movie.lol.we all can tell this is fake ass hell.WOW.lol.WERE U get Ur lick out of a jack crack box.lol.NO stars .lol
@joebartone your not a film compressionist or your just a really bad one. cause that sir is my actual job and the quality is not too great...in 1970 we had 960P HD basically higher end SD nowadays
You know whats funny? I love how people claim this is fake. Ignorance is a bliss. Watch the video of Gene Cernan "usa already went to mars". In the video he clearly says "buzz wants to go back to mars"
since technology is so advanced, can one say it is IMPOSSIBLE to differentiate between hoax and fact but still, can this be any more FAKE? seriously!! cant there just be a foam asteroid on fish wire to like, make this more satirical kuz that would make me laugh more xD.
@olit12341:13 yes.. when the window is coming at the beginning of the video. the glow around the planet and how it looks. doesnt seem right. google images has HD pictures taken from the satilite orbiting the planet.
@CodeBandet what its not red or orange haze about the planet. Like you believe it really is reddish, or the moon doesnt have any color to it. oh and hes right maybe you need to go back to school.
@STUDIOMACLEOD listen you stupid dishonest fucken moron, taking this video from another youtube user and using it to spread your bull shit is the lowest you can go as a human when it comes to trust and honesty. This VIDEO FOR ALL OF YOU TO KNOW COMES FROM THEFAKINGHOAXSTER. NOTICE AT THE TOP left of the video you can clearly see why there is a patch there, he is covering the original uploaders name. If I met you in person dude I aint even lying I would fuck your ass up, for being a POS.
WhatsAfterThisPlace 2 weeks ago
Nice spooky music at the beginning.
unholyimage 1 month ago
Impressive work, but the camera movement seems fake, work on that a little more.
Happyturtlebeach 1 month ago
@Happyturtlebeach If you were capable of writing an intelligent comment, rather than a cursory dismissal, you might have the nouse to question, research and ascertain what hardware you are observing is such proximity to Mars. Without such information you look idle.
warlock242 2 weeks ago
@warlock242 Actually I would know, since aerospace engineering is my field of work. Actually everyone would know if we had the capability or the funds to go to Mars. If humanity accomplished something like that, it would not fall under the radar as much as you propose. That's just common sense.
Happyturtlebeach 2 weeks ago
@Happyturtlebeach I mean imagine all those people who spent their whole lives accomplishing something so great and then none hear about it except in this mildly amusing video. That's like that conspiracy that humanity never walked on the moon, I think it's just nonsense.
Happyturtlebeach 2 weeks ago
@Happyturtlebeach but that's only if they went public. easy as that. the gov could spend money on something and we wouldn't be the wiser. its at a too grand a scale to notice. tell me; would you notice you were missing 800,000,000 or whatever amount of $ at that amount went missing? no you wouldn't so you cant dismiss that they could have simply just not told us (and our gov is known to do that)
Ubertastic 2 weeks ago
Also, the "film" is just pictures taken by the MRO.
ElGatoLoco698 2 months ago
@ElGatoLoco698 So why does the view move as though being held from within the craft?
warlock242 2 weeks ago
I don't think cameras in 1972 used dimensions that this video was filmed in.
ElGatoLoco698 2 months ago
great fake!
zenphil 2 months ago
A VERY VERY nice try. If it wasn't for Victoria crater, and polar cap (from Mariner 9 or Viking orbiter) footage, it could have looked quite convincing. Only Stanley Kubrick would have made it better (but with much bigger budget);-).
I like it.
winwoodmayall 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mars looks beautiful, when looking at it with your own eyes and not on pictures.
playerkyle13 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Did you8 get permission from NASA to use the MRO HiRISE of Victoria Crater in your video as well as Viking Orbiter imagery of the rest of Mars? I will sned NASA the link to this copyright infringement. Imafes are to be used for ligitimate purposes only, not in fake videos.
MrMercury3488 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrMercury3488 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrMercury3488 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrMercury3488 3 months ago
I really like people who speculate on things they have no idea what rocks the boat. To go to mars first we need parameters for mars landing, mars surviving and mars blast off. Like we had for the moon before they landed it.
aserta 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How will they get out and come back
64MojoMan 3 months ago
Comment removed
Smokingfox3 3 months ago
Yeah it is fake. You can see that. A very bad video.
madman007ist 3 months ago
AREA-51's S4 went to Mars with Russians in 1962 in a Reverse Engineered UFO ... watch?v=CsVqa2xaBeQ
SirHorryPatter 4 months ago
Was this before or after the manned mission to Uranus?
brandenbrownlie 4 months ago
hey guys, if they have technology to go to mars without letting anyone know, what's to say they didn't have today's filming technology in the 70s?
yoshihawv 4 months ago
Done in a NASA lab?
MrMyself48 4 months ago
looks beautifull, ill just say that.
roppasmoka 4 months ago
people are saying its fake coz of no stars you cant see it coz the the sun light refelcting the camra or human cant make it out
cocoo222 4 months ago
Nice fake...well maybe not but that's pretty close to how nasa would've faked it
back in the 70s because this film and the films of the apollo spacecraft approaching the moon all have one thing in common...NO STARS hahahaha
isn't it funny that according to these films there are no stars in space LMAO
MrWhealdon 5 months ago
@MrWhealdon
lrn2 local light source, dillweed.
Smokingfox3 3 months ago
@Smokingfox3 Irn2 local light source WON'T block out EVERY SINGLE STAR DUMB ASS!!!
MrWhealdon 3 months ago
@MrWhealdon
When you're next to a giant source of reflecting light, yeah, it actually will.
It appears you do not know how light works. Stars are billions or trillions of miles away. When you're 40 feet from the moon, your local light source will render distant dim stars invisible.
Smokingfox3 3 months ago
WOW .. if anyone finds out if this is real footage or not , i dont care what year ... please let me kno if this is authentic,,, cuz it looks real .. and it looks like mars ... and i want to know the truth ... unless is another hoax like the first moon landing or something .. but this time kept in silence and the footage was intentionally "leaked" or somethin .. too much BS around
sergiuchirita17 5 months ago
@sergiuchirita17 wait you think the first moon landing was faked? I kinda just stumble on this video by accident but do you really think the first moon landing or any of them for that matter was faked...not that you can't believe what you want but I don't think there is enough evidence to disprove ANY of the moon landings.
IIIIandrew 5 months ago
@IIIIandrew im pretty sure it was faked .. there are documentaries about how exactly they faked it , if u wanna see for urself ... but since then , i think there were at least 1 landing on the moon .. but was few years latter
sergiuchirita17 5 months ago
@sergiuchirita17 I really think that none of them were faked but everyone's entitled to their opinion
IIIIandrew 5 months ago
Ugh no 1 nows about the viking program.
brawlcooldude7 5 months ago
@brawlcooldude7 I hope your joking because you can find all kinds of info on the viking mission
Lilbirdgirl 5 months ago
@Lilbirdgirl i can never find the launch
brawlcooldude7 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the real deal. In frame 0:23 the image is of the Acidalia region with the Lunae Planum region at 10 o'clock. at 0: 36 is the image of the astronaut.?? 0:42 is the Tharsis region at 160 Longitude. 0:55 is the Valles Marineris region. 1:16 is the south polar caps.1:26 is close up of Valles.Frame 1:44 is the north polar region. 1:46 is Victoria Crater. If this is real it is such a historic revelation!!
fernandoluis7 5 months ago
This is the real deal. In frame 0:23 the image is of the Acidalia region with the Lunae Planum region at 10 o'clock. at 0: 36 is the image of the astronaut.?? 0:42 is the Tharsis region at 160 Longitude. 0:55 is the Valles Marineris region. 1:16 is the south polar caps.1:26 is close up of Valles.Frame 1:44 is the north polar region. 1:46 is Victoria Crater. If this is real it is such a historic revelation!!
fernandoluis7 5 months ago 2
how would it land on mars considering it needs flat land for a landing i mean u cant just land in the air or stop in the air u can slow down but not come to a stop you'd get hurt.
dsjkdfjdsklakkdshlfk 5 months ago
@dsjkdfjdsklakkdshlfk parachute man
PitBullsBiteHard 5 months ago
@PitBullsBiteHard what u mean like in the aircraft they would take so once they landed it'd stop them or just jump with a parachute?
dsjkdfjdsklakkdshlfk 5 months ago
@dsjkdfjdsklakkdshlfk the lander could have parachutes, thats what the mars rover did.
350z350zify 5 months ago
@dsjkdfjdsklakkdshlfk well first the craft enters the atmosphere and then it lets out a parachute. and slowly (hopefully) drops to the ground.
PitBullsBiteHard 5 months ago
@PitBullsBiteHard and i'm not implying this is real because i don't know if it is.
PitBullsBiteHard 5 months ago
@PitBullsBiteHard alright true i thought you meant like parachute out of the plan or something like that but yeah sure maybe that could work.
dsjkdfjdsklakkdshlfk 5 months ago
3ds Max)))
pohuist2012 5 months ago
we never NEVER went to the moon so how could we get to mars?? you see theres this thing called the van allen radiation belt which is impossible to cross and anything that tried, died. this is rediculous and you people are really gullable if you think that men went to the moon let alone mars., and the footage of the beast that goes through the ground on the mars video has a smack of the movie critters on it, its fraudulent obvious and sad!!
ScottieWallace 5 months ago
I can tell you this. If the story, that they went to map ancient ET archaeology, is why they went, then it is fake. Mars has a plethora of cities, structures and craft that are still manned. NASA manipulates i's images to hide this. it is the same with the Moon of Earth. I have the proof, so readers, don't worry about 'dissing' my claim, I am working on a video to prove it, as I have found a way to remove their trickery.
PeaCe
exice 5 months ago
This is a great piece of footage! It looks very convincing. Needs greater study!
magusn27 5 months ago
qhey-'"-è_çàrkgkjhuiirà)'àrkktklHDJKJF773904°°6+°0F?.?G¨HLUPJ£JMN.VNXCBNXYHTZTYUIOP48867759056°°TLGLLMFLLLFLFLLFLLFL%S%Z%%%jjstyuiBN?.fghsduur(-è_ç6789_çà)°+??F??F??FG?? ;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;............................... AAAACHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !! Duh !! Freakhead !!
terfle1106 5 months ago
this is some good footage even if its fake amazing
luvbootys 6 months ago
But this video is a fake a complete fake of a simulation large replica of mars and space window.. kinda funny actually.
Dorisequador 6 months ago
Yes it's true we went but it was in the 80's not 1973.
Dorisequador 6 months ago
LOL U could almost catch the toy man lmao.lol and the camera is bigger thin the window.lol.the toys arms were up foward like all toy .lol.
deltarem94 6 months ago
@deltarem94 wow, you have too much time on your hands to be spreading this kind of hate to strangers.
joebartone 6 months ago
if you try you can catch a glimpse of the astronaut. 0:37 you have to play with it play pause stuff.
xLowLightx 6 months ago
Has anybody ever heard of 'The Faking Hoaxer?' That's the one who made this video.
Surprise!
RulerOfSlides 6 months ago
its already known that during the moon missions they had fiber optic tech for the cam still classified to this day, that craft reminds me of space lab and parts of the ISS and during the shot you see a white guy looks to be and astronaut but good job on this one ......looks REAL.......?????
Thatboy1980 6 months ago
and that that camera is better than any your aware of in that time period! see what im getting at.....?
bjm351 6 months ago
I havent watched the video yet, just reading the comments i can see how blind some people already are!! wether this turns out to be fake or real isnt my point though, my point is the military/NASA has always been 30 years ahead ofthe public technology wise, remember they had stealth bombers in vietnam but i bet some of you though they were built in `91?!! its not unrealistic to think that any good footage from the 70s is fake due to clarity when its obvious they would only use the best camera!
bjm351 6 months ago
This looks extremely realistic.
LSDlucid 6 months ago
I think this is real :)
notesleb 6 months ago
I think the Martians put up a sign saying "We're not interested, sell your junk elsewhere!"
borgduck 6 months ago
Interesting video I wish it was real. IMHO it's a fake because:
1) The video quality is far better than the 1970 technology.
2) The hand-held movement is so much as he is trying to make a point of authenticity
3) The single frame with the astronaut is just there to make the video believable
MrSteliart 7 months ago
4) Smudges on the window glass that never seen again.
5) The outside of the craft looks superimposed to me, no ware for a sharp far spot to be seen.
6) Zooming into the planet has an effect on the planet's image but not on the crafts outside components. Also the focal point of that craft branch is on closer components than the far out ones, and yet the planet gets in focus.
MrSteliart 7 months ago
7) The inside frame of the window is in chrome, no paint on it and too many bolts or whatever they are
8) Shots at the end suggest that the craft is closer to Mars but now we see a shoot from a different window
9) Some shots show an window edge diffraction and some don't
If my analysis is wrong then it could be real.
MrSteliart 7 months ago
i think its fake they had better quality video in the 70's than this
Fragem420 7 months ago
BOGUS!!
wa1ufo 7 months ago
I'd love to see a conspiracy nut's reaction to this, attempting to simultaneously believe we didn't go to the moon but did go to mars.
DarrrrenCullllen 7 months ago 10
@DarrrrenCullllen The latest I heard was we did go to the moon- but we were show fake footage- or something to that effect??? Some people know- some think they know- others just want to know
dberry999666 3 months ago
@DarrrrenCullllen mars doesnt have an imense blanket of radiation around it
metaltaint20 2 months ago
@metaltaint20 Neither does the moon. It's the Earth that has Van Allen belts of radiation because of our magnetic field, any mission to Mars would have to pass through them also.
DarrrrenCullllen 2 months ago
@DarrrrenCullllen yea but we didnt leave our atmosphere in a vehicle made of tin foil
metaltaint20 2 months ago
@metaltaint20 Which vehicle did we travel to Mars in again? How do you know what it was made of?
DarrrrenCullllen 2 months ago
@DarrrrenCullllen i see youve gone off subject, i said nothing about the vehicle that went to mars nor mentioned it i just said the shuttle was protected for a moon mission not the lander
metaltaint20 2 months ago
@metaltaint20 During the mission to the moon, the crew spent the majority of the journey in the command module, which had much greater protection from radiation, not the lunar lander (the section made from 'tin foil') They only transferred to the lunar module before landing on the moon. Their trajectory to the moon was also designed to avoid the most intense areas of the van allen belt.
DarrrrenCullllen 2 months ago
OMG!!!! I HOPE THIS IS REAL!
punxer321 7 months ago
nobody has been on the moon or mars. there is to much radiation, they would fry. How come the astronouts aren't the slightest bit effected by the powerful radiation that sorrounds us?
BOMBORAZZ 7 months ago
Time frame to 0:37..when there's a white flash...go beck on it...and try seeing it...the man is holding some kind of device in his hand and he appears to be inside a space craft...looking at the beck ground..
SuperZkym 7 months ago
Fuck it's real...I time framed every pice of this video...and I saw a man...in the reflection dressed in white...taking the fucking video..this is unbelievable....omg...!!!!!! Everyone should no about this!!!!!!!!!!
SuperZkym 7 months ago
HAhah...nice washing machine
SuperZkym 7 months ago
Unless a drunk "astronaut" rode to Mars on a horse, this is the worst space footage I've ever seen.
zzzzzzzzzzzzz2 7 months ago
@RichardGait I paused at the exact second of the astronaut he is defiantly dressed like a astronaut thick black hair eyebrows large nose and holding papers very interesting
TheMichaelsquid 7 months ago
I paused at the exact second of the astronaut he is defiantly dressed like a astronaut thick black hair eyebrows large nose and holding papers very interesting
TheMichaelsquid 7 months ago
I pag
TheMichaelsquid 7 months ago
hey studio could you stabelize this video? youtube has that feature in the video editor now. maybe with a still camera we could get a better feel of the video. From what i see so far im torn. What shuttle did they use to get there? Im not stupid i know our gov has toys weve never seen nor heard of. Im sayin space travel within distance is possible. theres alot more goin on then what our gov tells us
KidMoneyFresh420 8 months ago
1:46 That is Victoria Crater, is 750 meters across, you just couldn't see it that big from low mars orbit, that is only a picture made recently and putted as background when a space station/ship model was filmed on green screen.
GrayShark09 8 months ago
Possibly footage of a fake Mars landing plan that never panned out.
timrocket2008 8 months ago
you guys keep on saying that back in the 70's we didnt have the video technology that was of this quality.. but should i remind you that if we really indeed made it to mars then we obviously had technology that the world was not aware of at that time.
telos611 9 months ago
Yeah right. They went to victoria creator that is 100m wide and it takes up the whole window? So they are orbiting within atmosphere justa few hundred meters off the ground? If you belive this you are a dumb shit.
Nice compositing though :)
TheFluffyDuck 9 months ago
Comment removed
nemnemnemnemi 10 months ago
The reason the poster has put a watermark over "a certain logo" we'd all "remember" is because this is a video done by The Faking Hoaxer....its a hoax people. Check out his version....the footage shown here comes from the last part of of it.
watch?v=HUHmd26rPKs
frankensteinmoneymac 11 months ago 6
the last place in the video was were a rover realy was. im not fucking lieing i saw them control it in a video same spot.
nic3k 11 months ago
Some of them were probably Earth places,just saw it? It was an station! It probably was MIR or ISS. I dont belive there would be that "good" technology camera in that year. I am not mars proffesional, but i dont belive mars got clouds like us. There are some gases but not like ours. Next : I wont belive some who will be first on mars would do that fast close ups and downs of mars. Next, WHERE ARE STARS?
Well at the few last seconds, WHO WILL SEND MIR TO ORBIT MARS? Fake better next time.
LuxorCZ 11 months ago
That looks more like Io than Mars
iliveonjupiter 11 months ago
why are some of those surface shots in infrared (fake color NASA photos)? :-)
chorioretinitis 1 year ago
In my opinion, if NASA had sent astronauts in orbit around Mars in the 1970's, even with secret mission objectives they would have said something. That would have been a great achievement.
If you look closely, parts of the spacecraft resemble the ISS viewed from a docked Soyuz. I'm just looking forward to read Joe's expert opinion. Whatever the truth, this is a really good video.
bluefury1984 1 year ago
Now this is very interesting
gloooma 1 year ago
Can you see the astronaut at 0:38?
RichardGait 1 year ago
I want to believe......but.....
spidercarnagevenom1 1 year ago
Who is the person 0:38 into the click? I have a screenshot of him.
fastersixth 1 year ago
as a Los Angeles professional film compressionist, i am looking for signs this was from a film source, as the definition is too great to have been 1970's video. I would like to examine the original file that was uploaded so I can step through it frame by frame, but from a cursory investigation, I would guess this film was shot after 1995, based on it's porperties.
joebartone 1 year ago 9
@joebartone Hi Joe, if you're interested in doing an email interview please contact us through uforadar.com. If this is fake we'd love to have a professional like you blow it away with real insight. Thanks
Mac
studiomacleod 1 year ago 2
@studiomacleod Hi and thanks
I like the site
I did not see any email address to write to.
try writing my through my website theloniousdub. com
I would be happy to help discuss the media and file. I can give my opinion on the metadata but I am not a UFO expert - just a digital media assets specialist
I worked for Technicolor, Ascent Media, and now full time at Crest Digital.
joebartone 1 year ago
@studiomacleod I hope you guys get updates soon..
spidercarnagevenom1 1 year ago
@joebartone
If they actually went to mars in the 1970's, then Maybe they also had better video cameras :/
darkins779 8 months ago
@joebartone compression for that time, isnt it also impossible to man a mission to mars then also ;) Just a thought. We dont know a 10 th of what they know about science and technology.
SubZero1703 8 months ago
@joebartone
No offence to your professional exp. but if the gov. is able to conceal stuff like this (as well as many other things) do you not thing that even if they had the technology back then they would release it to the general public? i'm still curios to know what you may have found considering it's a year later...
SirezX 6 months ago
@SirezX
If it's genuine it's might have been leaked through inside sources with "other-than-government" agendas.
KimWingz 6 months ago
@joebartone
if we assume that this video is genuine we can safely assume that secrecy towards technology is real, witch might explain the high-tech video equippment and quality :)
Did you guys find out anything?
KimWingz 6 months ago
@joebartone LOL U could almost catch the toy man lmao.lol and the camera is bigger thin the window.lol.the toys arms were up foward like all toy .lol.If Ur a L,A Professional film compressionist,U must have thought E.T was a real footage and not a Movie.lol.we all can tell this is fake ass hell.WOW.lol.WERE U get Ur lick out of a jack crack box.lol.NO stars .lol
deltarem94 6 months ago
@joebartone your not a film compressionist or your just a really bad one. cause that sir is my actual job and the quality is not too great...in 1970 we had 960P HD basically higher end SD nowadays
imask8r 4 months ago 2
You know whats funny? I love how people claim this is fake. Ignorance is a bliss. Watch the video of Gene Cernan "usa already went to mars". In the video he clearly says "buzz wants to go back to mars"
Ciscokid42069 1 year ago
since technology is so advanced, can one say it is IMPOSSIBLE to differentiate between hoax and fact but still, can this be any more FAKE? seriously!! cant there just be a foam asteroid on fish wire to like, make this more satirical kuz that would make me laugh more xD.
omfg4all 1 year ago
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHHAHAA Noooooo waaaaaaaaayyyyyy! You are stupid! so isnt ufo radar! that doesnt even look like mars.
CodeBandet 1 year ago
@CodeBandet Then what does mars look like?
FestiveVortex 1 year ago
@FestiveVortex google it :D
MiN4meIzJay 1 year ago
@MiN4meIzJay I was being sarcastic lol...
The planet in this video is either Mars... or the video is fake to begin with.
FestiveVortex 1 year ago
@CodeBandet
have you been to mars to know what it really looks like in close orbit?
jimboybaboy 1 year ago
@jimboybaboy Nope. But they have satelites that are.
CodeBandet 1 year ago
@CodeBandet 'so isn't ufo radar' ?? I think you need to get hooked on phonics before approaching your keyboard again.
studiomacleod 1 year ago 18
@studiomacleod Right that was lame UFO RADAR..................dumb
CodeBandet 1 year ago
@CodeBandet O.O what do you mean that doesn't look like Mars??
olit1234 1 year ago
@olit1234 mars doesnt have white clouds. Looks like it was made in 3ds max... my opinion.
CodeBandet 1 year ago
@CodeBandet I thought they were Ice caps/Ice sheets.
olit1234 1 year ago
@olit1234 no the ice cap is grouped up. not spread everywhere take a closer look.
CodeBandet 1 year ago
@olit1234 1:13 yes.. when the window is coming at the beginning of the video. the glow around the planet and how it looks. doesnt seem right. google images has HD pictures taken from the satilite orbiting the planet.
CodeBandet 1 year ago
@CodeBandet agree except for the space probe that would have been edited and the mars animation thing integrated to make it look like mars orbit
sketchupto3drad 1 year ago
@CodeBandet what its not red or orange haze about the planet. Like you believe it really is reddish, or the moon doesnt have any color to it. oh and hes right maybe you need to go back to school.
xLowLightx 6 months ago
@xLowLightx not at all doesnt matter what you say its fake. you know it is... unless you think we have fema camps to...
CodeBandet 6 months ago