Added: 1 year ago
From: ReneMotorSports
Views: 137,743
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • haha, this is my pops friend!

  • Dammit. I was hoping someone had cut the front off of one engine, the back off another, and put the two together in one car.

  • 13b+13b+13b= 39b rotary engine..

  • @pdjsa RX 4

  • @madjimms PPRE in New Zealand are making a 6 rotor in an rx

  • the FC sounds awsum

  • sounds almost like my built V8 i like it lol

  • lol tuffffff

  • nice intercoolers lol

  • the sound like freaking 2 stroke dirt bikes and thats cool :)

  • ARE THOSE D-MAX SUSPENSION I SEE?

  • 3 rotor? cosmo?

  • @Guitar0wner

    What i'm guessing a 20B out of cosmo people use the all the time..

  • No he means six look at the intake count the runners total of six its rare granted but it is entirely possible I've seen as many as 8 but they were bigger way bigger they were also diesel

  • remember, one mans junk is another mans treasure... i'd sell my left testicle for one of those fully built

  • anyone know the power of those engines?

  • omg that fc... i do believe i jizzed

  • He probably gets like 6 mpg out of that baby xD not that you'd care with that beast

  • @bakaenkaaka and burns a quart of oil a day lol

  • Nice

    

  • ::YAWNS:: That's noise. I'd rather hear thunder from a REAL powerhouse.

  • @Z28Racer yeah but how many v8s do u know that can rev past 10,000rpm

  • @Z28Racer I'd would love to see your face after the red one, you know with the weedwacker engine blow past you

  • @Z28Racer Ignorance is bliss. A rotary might not appeal to everyone, but the amount of power they put out for such a small displacement shocks most people. The latest iteration of the rotary used by Mazda in the RX-8 put out near 250hp with a displacement of just 1.3L without any forced induction. Not to shabby ;). Turbo one and you have a quick little car -- and RX-8's handle like a dream. I'd never own one because they require more attention than normal LOL, but they are powerful as feck.

  • @Z28Racer lol, typical v8 fanboy, let me guess you still drive your dads 3800lbs car with the gas guzzling 6.0 v8 that puts out a mere 290bhp... while i zip on by in my 1.3l 3029lbs economy car that puts out 232bhp..... hmm if you do the math at that power/weight that's a win buddy.. even if you add in the mere 129lbft. trq #'s off the line.

  • @Z28Racer You mean a 4-rotor engine, right??

  • lovin it

  • Misleading title, and shame on you if you thought this was actually going to be a 6 rotor engine

  • @JesseCyrussHarlow One can always hope lol

  • @JesseCyrussHarlow well, there are actually 6 rotors going at once... just in two different engines...

  • 3 rotor no 6 rotor 

  • @mp46100 the vid says 6 rotor cuz its 2 3 rotors idling beside eachother :P

  • @JasonMann8 now but in the video, you put that engine is a 6 rotors

    not it has 3 rotors and that is just to say you have 6-cylinder reciprocating type

    I know plenty of rotary engines

    please if you can put right the title is wrong

  • correct me if i'm wrong but the whole point of a wankel engine was to be small and light as possible

  • @dunhillsupramk3 Actually the rotary engine was first designed by a German who wanted to use it as a supercharger, but after finding out it didn't work so well he noticed it would make a great little engine because of the few moving parts. His name was Felix Wankel and he invented it in the 40's.

  • @Legend4444 Actually, many modern airplanes use the Wankle rotary engine... Although, I have seen a radial engine (a section of one anyway) used on a motorcycle called the Hellcat.

  • you dont buy rotary engines for torque. silly argument. rotaries kick ass nomatter wich way you look at it. drive one once and you will be hooked for life ;) i used to be a camaro guy then i drove a rx7. changed my outlook on imports all together. owned my fair share of 4cyls since then too, and all i can say is nothing compares to rotaries. hell what better then a airplane motor in a car right?

  • @Klipnotica airplane rotaries are different. You're thinking of a radial engine, not a rotary.

  • @Legend4444 You are thinking of a wankel type of engine. Its not a rotary, tough its called like that.

    Rotaries are different.

    Rotaries were used primarily by planes in the 1st world war.

  • @puchomoreno rotary is a wankel engine a radial is an airplane engine

  • @puchomoreno There are two types of rotary engine. There's the Wankel rotary, which is what's in this video. Then there's the old piston rotary engines from world war 1. There's also radial engines, which look like piston rotaries.

  • @Legend4444 wrong but right , there are indeed wankles in some small aircraft.

    but correct radial and rotary are completly different.

  • @Legend4444 actually wankel rotaries are becoming quite popular in smaller aircraft.

  • @Legend4444 nope pretty sure he means a wankel rotary in a plane

  • @Legend4444 You are wrong, wankel rotary engines have been used in light aircraft for over 2 decades now, go educate yourself before you try and school people because its YOU that is confused between the two types of enginges referred to as "rotary", dick.

  • @Legend4444 There is rotary in aeroplanes too...

  • @Legend4444 there is a rotary and a radial in a plane, the radial has its cylinders pointing outward from the crank the rotary is exactly the same, apart from the block spins, these are wankles if we want to get technical

  • those engine bays look like sex

  • @supratrdlova I want whatever you're having. The sex i mean.

  • SO whats the advantage of putting the intercooler under the hoodcoop vs in front of the grill?

    

  • @CalebHoernschemeyer Nothing, some people just put theirs out from because they think it looks cool. Or because their intercooler is too big.

  • @CalebHoernschemeyer It helps airflow to the radiator more than anything, because as you can see with the first car, the intercooler isn't blocking the radiator from airflow. So now all he needs to do is allow for correct airflow to the radiator and intercooler by making a type of paneling.

  • It's like a whole different world, at the other end of that rx7

  • nice rx7,the yellow sounds like a street port,the red sounds bridge,with my experence a street port 20b makes the same hp as a bridge port 20b,and the life spand is way shorter with the bridge expecially if you cut the water housings seals.and the torque is lower with the bridge,so its better street port. but great job.any videos on the dyno with the two cars.

  • @pinkpanthercow huh???? so how does enlarging the air flow to that of almost double a streetport some how creates the same power??...that makes no sense....and on top of that he said semi peripheral ported which is the larges port job you can do

  • @LivingtheRotaryLife my friend it makes a diffrience with a 13b,the 20b has a lot of torque,and when you go bridge or peri port it low down the torque,and its harder to tune the 20b that way,and you have street port 20b making the same power as bridge ,can you answer why,or you want proof.the 20b is an amazing engine,torque it has the 13b had no torque.

  • @pinkpanthercow thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard, regardless of torque loss in following the volumetric flow rates the ability to push a greater flow of air in and out will increase power and at a faster rate...and quite frankly the proof is that if a street port made just as much power as a larger port job with the same volume rate, then mazda would not be P-porting their engines in their fully spec'ed race cars in every race class they enter would they? i didnt think so

  • @LivingtheRotaryLife my friend i said the 20b has a lot of torque,the ultimate power is peripheral port,all the power is on top,and no low down power,thats why you have to rev the pp hard,because it takes away the low down power in the 20b it takes away most of the torque,and thats why the 20b is such an amazing motor,the diffrience between the 13b and the 20b is that you dont have to stress out the 20b as much as the 13b,why is that my friend,and can you please tell me the cc of a 13b and a 20b

  • @pinkpanthercow 1308cc's for the 13b and 1962cc's for the 20b,and of course its all power on top, every rotary is all power on top if we wanted power down low we woulda got a v8, they dont rev up to 9k for nothing,and of course it will be easier to make power from a 20b despite what rotaries can do theres no replacement for displacement, adding an extra 654cc's will always make things easier, but regardless and i cant stress this enough A BRIDGE 20B WILL MAKE MORE POWER THEN A STREET PORT 20B

  • sounds like my rx8 just without the xtra rotors...to much work for nothing but nice rx7

  • 12A, 13B, 20B, 26B and a few other rare ones like 12B and 10A.

  • Someone make a 6 rotor 13B (in 1 car....)

  • @madjimms wouldnt be a 13b it would be a 39b

  • Comment removed

  • @madjimms lol 4 rotor is a 26b and a 3 rotor is a 20b

  • @DJCocoPuffs I thought 26b what a motor for the 787, wasn't it made with 4? When you put two 2 rotor motors together its something else.

  • @madjimms 26b just means the size of the motor using 647cc rotors

  • @DJCocoPuffs 13B+13B=26B....

  • @madjimms go ahead n try it its not that simple you need a custom e-shaft made which cost about 10k for 26b's

  • @DJCocoPuffs Having one ordered might cost that much, but you can always buy a used lathe.

  • @madjimms anyways.... done arguing u simply dont understand haha ROFL

  • @DJCocoPuffs Your arguing? I was simply stating what has been done thousands of times already if you looked on youtube...

  • @DJCocoPuffs hes actually refering to how fujita engineering used to make their 4 rotors before they started using full length eccentric shafts, theres a few videos on youtube

  • @DJCocoPuffs So a 6 rotor would be 40b :-D

  • @madjimms 647cc times 6 equals3882cc wich would be rounded up to a 3.9L or 39b lol

  • This was so beautiful it actually bought a tear to my eye.

  • you all say 20B but they could be 13Gs??? not much of a difference between the two really just intake manifolds i think??

  • you mean a 20b....3 rotor

  • @mxbp257 2 cars x 3 rotors ... do the math

  • @DjLeon95Antiracist how many comments say 20b. I believe the first reaction people get when seeing this vid is, why would he put 6 rotors when there are only 3 in both cars when you could just put 2 rx7's whith 20b engines lol. but i guess putting 6 rotors sounds better.

  • Those are some interesting t/m intercoolers

  • lol haha, 6 rotors indeed.... haha

  • nice

  • My Rotary Works vmount for the 13b FC was a complete piece of shit. Their support service sucks as well.

    Anyways, this car looks legit! I just wouldn't buy any RW products. I spent tons of money with them and I regret it.

  • that is a 20B

  • @shubybuby1 notice how it says 2 rx7s??? both obviously having 3 rotor 20bs? = all up 6 rotors they never said it was in one car :)

  • the red one sounds like its going to kill my family

  • 3 ROTORES!

  • Why is one mean sounding and the other is smoothed?

  • Don't mind Jeff Jones's old rx7

  • aawww what a miss leading title i thought it was gonna be an engine with 6 rotors, though my guess i,s since only a 4 rotor exist there would be problem with making it or how it runs works.

  • The acoustic mullet of engines;

    Business in the front (quiet and smooth)

    Party in the back!

  • Rotary's don't need torque. Actually car doesn't need torque to be fast. Horsepower, revolutions and light chassis are important.

  • @SorsanSuuriAfro Agree, but it depends what you are going to. Rotories are excellent track queens because of the low torque. It makes it easy to round corners going full throttle while not drifting. Of course, this also means drifting is easy with more hp than torque =). Just good control all round.

  • i actually thought there was an engine with 6 rotors in this vid xD

  • love the fc & fd, the fc sounds about right

  • If theres one car term I dont understand, its rotary. Can some1 explain to ke the significance of a rotary vehicle?

  • @iverson25allen Its small and compact with a higher hp/L than other engines and weigh less. That's why Mazda's rotaries got banned form Lemans after they won. Would be cool to see Mazda's improvements in rotaries duking it out against the diesels in Lemans.

  • @carmodifire Woah, so I bet that they have some serious torque power then?

  • @iverson25allen are you being sarcastic? Rotaries don't have much torque, but I think the turbo ones do. the 20b engine has 300 hp and 300 ins/ft torque.

  • @carmodifire it was sarcasm lol i shoulda put this in "XD"

  • Comment removed

  • @carmodifire Sry man but rotarys are known for torque.

  • @Drift7King07 You mean lack of it.

  • @carmodifire well the turbo is what gives it much more torque if you ever rode in a twin turbo its more of a jerk and throw your head back into the seat when the first one hits and when the second one engages its like woo haha...

  • @Drift7King07 Im pretty sure rotors lack torque, this is not meant to be offensive, and that is why turbos are more popular on rotors even though they are more dangerous for your engine than superchargers. Look up stock rx-8 stats, like 232hp and 150 torque or something at the flywheel.

  • @LiveWire8241 26B has 500ft/lbs tq with about 700hp. Naturally aspirated and only 2.6L displacement. Not only that but it can eaily spin above 10K with high RPM like that you dont even need torque you can take advantage of gearing.

  • @JD0x0 This is true and I argue with none of it, but most rotory owners do not own a 26B, heck most stick with the original 13B. My point is most people hate of rotories b/c of the lack of torque. The 232 hp for a stock rx-8 is actually pretty decent considering it is so lightweight, it is just the fact that rotories have more hp than torque with no forced induction, always, period. Dont get me wrong, im not saying every rotory engine lacks in torque, not at all, easy fix, just gotta pay.

  • @LiveWire8241 FD is standard with forced induction....

  • @LiveWire8241 o and the 3 rotor has more tq then hp :p

  • @LiveWire8241 theyre not too bad on torque if you think about it. My 1.8 makes about 130hp and 100ft/lbs torque. Thats about the same as a n/a 1.3 rotary from the 80's. The renesis which is pretty much an updated 13b gets around 240hp, 150lbs/torque. Which destroys my 1.8. I understand that a rotary doesnt have much torque compared to a big stroker V8 but for the extremely small size of the rotor they get lots of torque. Increasing the stroke will make rotories torquier and more reliable.

  • @JD0x0 Nono, again, I agree with everything you just said, for such a small engine it does amazing things. Im glad im finally talking to someone who knows something about rotories, its quite relieving actually. As for the increased "stroke", from what I understand to be the height the rotor travels, I believe that is what they are doing with the new rx7/rx9 16X engine. They made the housing taller and thinner (from the side view) and I believe this is increasing torque.

  • @LiveWire8241 also some forced induction. I am just praying and hoping the redline is still high, though inside i know it will be lowered.

  • Really nice work. Well finished engine bays, and running sweet as a nut!!

  • Amazing - really nice to see! thanks for posting

  • AE86 vs FD... Cue Euro-Techno, 4, 3, 2, 1 GO!

  • great job rene your the best @ those 3 rotary power

  • Great Engines.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more