"CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT"

[kevrs2]

GUY DIDNT DO HIS HOMEWORK :(

[Harv7340]

JURISDICTION hearsay?..type imbatman57 in youtube & talkshoe.com

[ReligiousWord]

Unfortunately saying your MR puts you into their corporate juristiction. Also must make sure you remind the "business meeting" that you are not a citizen, nor an agent of the corporation and claim no ownership over the legal name...

[SE962582C]

The Magistrate was a green and an in-experienced young Australian woman, not an experienced Justice of the Commonwealth, who would know how to throw the Book at him. Her voice was so sweet that it made me uncomfortable, if not cringe.

[Joebhoy1888able]

She actually sounded nice.

[PatriotRadioMilitia]

not only does he not reply to mr wilson but he is not Arguing ANYTHING

[brookwest]

I don't stand under that statement. The judge will jump up and Take Off.

[daniel679867]

i hate to say this i dont know where that is at but texas has it where if you want a jury you get it you dont have to plea even if you answer to the name you are called so i dont know where who ever made this video is trying to do explain?

[daniel679867]

yeah go to court in texas and let them ask you if your mr wilson they throw your ass under the jail.

[number1Ptolemy]

Good for You. You stood your ground and told the retarded bitch the truth

the sad thing, the only thing that would suddenly make it crystal clear to her

is if you put a bullet in her brain. thats the only thing these pigs understand

is when you end them.

[tazzym1]

Its such a shame he CONSENTED TO being a MR WILSON - it matters not what comes out of his mouth after that - Peace :) UK

[20Proff]

Poor bloke... Sounds like he's totally lost. I believe he made many mistakes in what he was attempting to do. But, provided there was no victim other than the State - a fictional entity - I don't care. Waste their time if you have time to waste of your own.

[MrBiejos]

Yes he wilson did not learn the tricky rules of their courts. I'm happy that the comments here are of people who are learning their rights. Anybody find the do's and do not's rules yet on how to act in court?

[theTRUTHHertz1]

tHEY GOT U MATE.. mr! U R NOT mr!!

[TheSkaseman]

I fully appreciate and agree with Mr Wilson's position and the unlawful nature of the court but do we think perhaps the aggressive nature of his tone is detracting from the message he's trying to convey? The tone and constant interruptions are unlikely to be generating any support within the court.

[kevrs2]

never answer a question!......  ,its as simple as that :)

[muncyweb]

We are challenging jurisdiction as well in North Carolina. Several court followup videos available. NCRepublic do+ or g

[teckniec2]

This must be in the uk or britian. American Judges don't even let you talk

[PsychoSpammer]

@teckniec2 That was in Australia

[jomokariuki]

@teckniec2 Australia mate, hence the map of Australia in the middle of the logo throughout the whole video.. Oh and UK and Britain are the same thing

[teckniec2]

@jomokariuki Like I know what an Aussie flag looks like. They don't teach us shit in the US :(

[jomokariuki]

@teckniec2 haha all good. Peace bro

[daniel679867]

@teckniec2 then start reading and listening to the teacher instead of sleeping in class they teach just people like you that dont want to learn.

[teckniec2]

@daniel679867

People like me? You don't even know me....at all. I didn't know what an Assie flag looks like that means I dont want to learn and I sleep in class. Obvious troll is obvious.

[SydneyMedia1]

BURWOOD COURT GOES SOFT ON DRUGO CROOKS

[mrtruthify]

YOU FOOL..

ALL THIS HUMAN BEING HAD TO DO WAS CLAIM COMMON LAW JURISDICTION! COMMON LAW JURISDICTION! AND NEVER EVER EVER EVER ANSWER TO YOUR 'LEGAL FICTION' "MR. SO & SO".. THAT IS NOT YOU! THAT IS A 'PERSON.. A LEGAL FICTION.. NOT A HUMAN BEING!!!!!!!!

FIRST THING OUT OF YOUR MOUTH SHOULD ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS BE.. I CLAIM COMMON LAW JURISDICTION.. SINCE HE DID NOT.. HE WAS STILL UNDER MARITIME LAW JURISDICTION.. FOOLISH HUMANS.. YOU MUST LEARN THESE THINGS IRS ALL VERY VERY SIMPLE....

[LawStudent7]

yo stop listening to this bull shit. he went in all wrong. he went in aggressivly and should have just been assertive and calm. he went in stubbuling over his fuccin words and shit. he didnt state any case law for the record. he just spewed bullshit out his mouth and got everybody confused and frantic. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!! Islam Moors

[mrtruthify]

No more will this be kept from you. Take this, research it, BECOME it. Time is SHORT.. USE this, I ONLY ASK THAT YOU FREE OTHERS. Watch in THIS ORDER. You are now FREE.. FREE from ALL OPPRESSION. #1) youtube.com/watch?v=-2b6dznIrf­w&feature=related 2) youtube.com/watch?v=KwWEK3eAgO­0&feature=related 3) youtube.com/watch?v=hj7yaqBFCh­0&feature=related 4) youtube.com/watch?v=Cci5MSvsSm­c&feature=related (U MUST use GOOGLE to FIND vids) Love U ALL.. ISLAM MOORS IS ENSLAVEMENT!

[coreyeib]

"Are you Mr. Wilson?" - "Yes" - they got you.

[ethanhines]

@coreyeib yup now the court does have jurisdiction over you and you are now in admirality/maritime/ucc court correct me if i am wrong

[coreyeib]

@ethanhines Yes, if you respond to "Mr." (a fictional title and property under their jurisdiction) then you have consented to their jurisdiction. Look up the legal definition of Mister, and watch the Antiterrorist vid on Standing in Court, he has a great vid on dealing with courts and what to say when the judge addresses (insults) you as Mister.

[coreyeib]

@ethanhines in my layman opinion yes it does grant jurisdiction. They are calling the name of the 'person' on the birth certificate, which is government property and by answering you create joinder (like waving your hand at an auction) and are subject to their jurisdiction. I personally found it very fascinating to look up the definition of Mister, after that I always correct any public official who refers to me as Mister (of course in a respectful way because most don't intend to insult)

[coreyeib]

@ethanhines I believe you are asking me the wrong question; a better way to learn the proper answer is to ask "what does the title 'Mister' mean?" - Learning the meaning of the word will lead you to the proper response in your own words.

[coreyeib]

@coreyeib ooops I meant to post this as a response to @stigma49

[stigma49]

@coreyeib when they asked him are you mr. Wilson what should he have said. for example if his name is John Wilson

[mrwigiteeman]

Thanks for uploading this, we all can learn from mistakes, and this is chalk full of them. I bet he even passed the bar and was sitting or standing at the "defendant's" desk, silly oaf. About the Mr. and Sir titles, if you state your lawful name, and the "judge" keeps calling you else-wise, thats not really your fault, but you need to state it, state that it is your lawful name, not legal, and not cross the bar. When i was asked if i was "blank blank blank," in court once i said "i think so"

[bigyellowism]

Bahahahaha. This guy is such a dingus. He's not fighting for anyone's rights. He's just making himself look like a tool and wasting the magistrate's time.

Australia also has no Bill of Rights, and there's no statutory bill of rights in NSW either. And why is he talking about habeas corpus and the magna carta? I don't wanna tell anyone else how to have an insane rant, but neither one is exactly relevant...

Also, why would addressing him as 'Mr' have anything to do with jurisdiction?

[mercurio0000]

Also in some states of the USA it is a Felony for a cop to turn on their "emergency" lights on you to stop you. You may have similar laws there in Australia. You see, you don't see the Ambulance or Fire departments turning on their emergency lights on illegally. Who should a cop have that privilege?

It is exiting for me to see there is a movement in the USA, England, New Zland, Australia etc about this stuff. Keep the fight for your rights.

[mercurio0000]

To my Australian friends. I live in the USA and I recently found out something that I think it may be of value to you. Research it since I don't know the laws is Australia.

Here in the USA sometimes Judges will want to enter a plea for you. They are not supposed to, but if they do. state, "let the record of this court show that the Judge (Whatever name his/she has) has enter a pleas of... (guilty, not guilty, no contender) as only a defendant can enter a plea, Judge (name) is now the defandant

[augustBody]

Bastards!

I live in the US and the judges do the same thing... enter a plea on my behalf without my consent.

In a revolt, the judges will be the first to go.

[purpledream77]

He fucked up on the first question. He responded yes to him being Mr. Wilson.

That gave her jurisdiction.

[brygenon]

The thing to remember about the judge is that she's the judge.

[LemmingHerda]

Are you "MR WILSON" Sir?

"Yes"

.

... bugger

[Roylamx]

She sure has a sweet accent and a gorgeous voice! But the way she is going she's going to learn the hard way that when you make peaceful revolution impossible you make violent revolution inevitable. She leaves the people no choice, they will always choose violence to restore order, then her pretty little tyrannical voice will finally be silent. When the tyrants are dead freedom will reign! Doesn't she know she's using private, copyrighted "Code", when the people require common law and liberty?

[Nikkeftw]

I think all this is really nice, but giving the video good rating is not okay, since he makes a HUGE mistake, admitting hes is "Mr Wilson".

[NtrlBlackLezboBeauty]

@Nikkeftw how else is he supposed to be adreesed then?

is he supposed to make a fake name or something. im confused lol

[VictoriaWarrior]

@NtrlBlackLezboBeauty  Your title is a fiction. The birth certificate of title was created and Issued by the government when you were born. But, you are you and not the name.

You can call me honey or you can call me a pain or you can call me late for dinner, but , I am not the name.

I am a flesh and blood, spirit being and so are you. stop living as a fiction, It's an illusion. See My Private Audio site

[LemmingHerda]

@NtrlBlackLezboBeauty

.

The title "Mr" is a fiction or a "person".

.

You can ask the judge, clerk, whoever to respectfully refer to you simply by your name "John Smith" or "Mary Blogs".

.

Responding to the title "Mr XXXX" concedes that you are the fictional representation and thereby you give the court "jurisdiction" over you.

.

Best way to think of this is a complex game of "Simon Says" the magistrate/clerk want you to concede you common law rights to their admiralty/commercial court.

[1beinki]

@NtrlBlackLezboBeauty

I believe he should have answered "I am me."

[Machao6]

Surely by disputing the validity of the laws of your country, you are also reneging on being a citizen OF that country? Since pretty much every citizenship binds you by law?

I make a difference of course between being a citizen of the country (ie, passport owner), and residing on the territory of that country.

[Macedon51]

@Machao6

You can be a national of that country without being a citizen -- a distinction cleraly stated in US passport forms.

[Macedon51]

Mr. Wilson, I salute you for standing up for your rights and for what is right.

I believe the criticism below is correct, you accepted a legal fiction (that you are Mr. Wilson).

That Australian twat is disgusting.

[andrewrosso]

are you mr WILSON yes hugh mistake. They just got jurrisdiction.

[Myaucat]

wow this judge sure has a lot of patience for this guy..

[tcw008]

In respect to the claims of courts gaining control over people by use of certain words, governments being corporations, and admiralty laws being the laws of the state, where exactly do you get this information? I study the law, and I have yet to find anything similar to this. Some guidance would be much appreciated. Thank you.

[bolabus]

wELL DONE JUDGE LADY,HE,S A MUPPET.trial by jury is commercial,goodbye mr wilson...........

[GoCo77]

Juries commercial? Please explain.

[Hugovstar]

This judges will be judge one day the same way they judge others, no mercy for them. They are trying to make us into slaves.. This is why all Lawyer that defend the system are part of the problem.. One day their life will be before the true Judge of all and they will have to give an account for their deeds. Hell is to good for them.

[immafreemann]

Being cool doesnt help. The Corporation representative (judge) will continue to try to get you into contract and under their controll. They will tell you to sit down, leave, etc and if you do then you have demonstrated that you are under their control (jurisdiction). The Judge is not used to recieving orders and will refuse to recieve orders. Its best to send all your information in in writing, getting it file stamped into the record and then let them not respond to it and lose.

[PhiRLad]

He would have been far better of being cool, calm and collected. Raising your voice and getting angry only agitates everyone including yourself and makes it more likely you will slip up and enjoin yourself to your strawman fictional corporate entity or to enter into contract with them. He could have said something like: "Your honour, I shall give you my name upon proof of claim that you have established jurisdiction over the matter pending."

[jimk10117]

this bloke called John is a legend, what courage he has!!!

he was totally not intimidated at all, a real leader for us all.

[chotaboy66]

Magistrates cops trick you by asking your name this can be rectified by saying you are not JOHN WILSON reply my name is (John of the Wilson family) & stick to it ,works with warrant invites served also.

Police and magistrates courts cant deal with humans only when you submit your person by saying YES when they say your name,walking into the court is submission ,the words every one stand is submitting ,avoid these first or challeng jurisdiction prior the above with respect of the courts.

[chotaboy66]

C C Act 1995

268.10 Crime against humanity

enslavement A person commits an offence if: the perpetrator(eg magistrate)exercises any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over one or more persons.Constitution 79,80 judges low case means jury so its an illegal court with no jury s109

When a law of a State(admiralty law)is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth (common law),the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid

[Driftersudewayz]

(This is not legal advice it is just how I may do Things) The court may call me "John". If you have any dealings with "Mr.Wilson" here you go. Hand over the birth certificate. State you are a man of God standing in gods kingdom and all you see are your brothers who are standing in Gods kingdom also. The Judge cant budge and MUST dismiss the case! Guys please research this information and discover the powerfull meaning of this statement.

Peace to all my fellow freemen.

[neoverse]

Do these people in the courts not realize that they are trampling on the rights of other? Or do they get their hearts removed while in college?

[AceOfHeart2012]

A name is a title and a title is person and a person is a corporation and a corporation is a fiction. Mr. Wilson answering in the affirmative creates joinder. He should have said: "Please call me John." He should have answered to nothing else. ALERT!!! RetSquid is an Illuminati planted agent. Either that or he's totally naive. Just sayin'....

[AceOfHeart2012]

He should never have answered to 'Mr. Wilson'. He should have said: "A name bestows title, a title implies ownership. Are you my owner? Am I public property? I do not consent and I waive all benefit privileges. Good day." And then he should have turned around and walked out. By the way folks, it should be quite obvious by now that RetSquid could well be a spook planted by the CIA, NSA or DHS to infiltrate, undermine and subvert the truth movement. I recommend having nothing to do with him.

[jonerton15]

she said "are you Mr. Wilson" he said "that is my name." He didn't say he was Mr. Wilson, he said that was his name. To be something and to be names something is different

[GalaxyHorse]

Entering into controversy is also an error-he is just opening himself to contempt-of-the-court: Calmness is of essence. I am a living soul known as **** with a family name of Wilson..and so on.

[venuecam]

Unfortunately, as soon as the guy identified himself as "Mr. Wilson" his basically hung himself. Notice the judge continually referring to him as "Mr. Wilson"? Technically the judge HAS jurisdiction in this case. If he'd not identified himself to the judge as a "Mr." then he could've instantly had his case dismissed.

The judge is referring him to his incorporated name therefore allowing them the right to "commercially tie him to them". He sounded like he was unprepared.

[SCOTTDAVIDSON32]

your exactly right! You cant agree that name is you haha

[Snurdgerbly]

The man who represents himself in court has a fool for a client.

[Burster1]

so then a plumber who plumbs his own drain is a fool?

[Snurdgerbly]

Burster1, you're making a straw man argument. Repairing drains and appearing in court are obviously very different situations. It would be fairer to ask if a a lawyer who plumbs his own drains is likely to be acting foolishly. I doubt many lawyers have been able to devote much time to studying the craft of plumbing. so would be better served by engaging an expert.

[Snurdgerbly]

My point is that Mister Wilson shot himself in the foot by following a direction from the court whose jurisdiction he refused to recognise. He hadn't prepared himself well. One would not attempt to repair a drain without the right tools and knowledge.

[Burster1]

Snurdgerbly, I believe you have now idea what a straw man argument is, or anything about Law for that matter. The point I made was spot on. If you know your rights and the Law, then you are better off representing yourself. It is well known in the Law community that a lawyers First duty is to the Judge and then the courts, then lastly to his client. Did you know that ? Mr Straw Man? Too often we . . . enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.

- John F. Kennedy

[Snurdgerbly]

I stand corrected, Burster1. But my point remains that, using your plumber metaphor, If Mr Wilson had attempted a plumbing repair with the same knowledge and preparation that he used in this court matter, he would still have wound up in the shit.

[Burster1]

agreed

[OneManAndHisFiction]

For how to correctly do this by establishing your standing as one of the People, see Bill Thornton's material and audio seminars.

Bill Thornton on: 1215 org

And see FreeManAndHisDog's material.

[stvbw]

This guy is toast......not only did he reply to "mister" he also followed a direction from the judge. His intention was good but he needs to do his homework.

[nanciqwerty]

JimmyXXL is exactly right.

This guy is brave but should have read more info before the court date.

[JimmyXXL]

"Mister" Wilson has lost the game since he admits to being a corporate entity with the title of "Mr.". By not correcting her, he's agreeing.

You wouldn't call your friend "Officer" or "Constable" and pretend it meant absolutely nothing.

[MrSolvency]

LOL!!!!!

[antoconno]

Im all for no accepting a courts juristiction but why bother turning up to the court at all if you dont recognise it??

[OneManAndHisFiction]

You're exactly right if it is a Nisi Prius Court ( - a court by prior agreement, such as by "license", "contract", "submission", "registration" of some right or property etc.), but, if you are before a Court of Record ( - a court proceeding according to the common law), you have to answer all claims, either by a defense (submission), a counterclaim, and/or objection to challenge jurisdiction of the claiming party.

This was not a Court of Record however, so you are right.

[rjohson]

he didnt make a mistake by answering to mr wilson; that his name is mr wilso he has to answer to his name; as long as he distiguishes himself from the strawman.

[decy22]

"mr. Wilson" is not his name. It's probably "john wilson or jim wilson" or whatever but there is no "mr" in his name. mr. is a ward of the system. it is an artificial title that places you under their jurisdiction if you agree to them calling you that.

[rjohson]

oh wow thaks for that information i didnt relize the title wilson is artificial. i went to court and i let them know right off the bat that the person on the summons ws not me but a artificial person, and that i was a son of god. but they called me mr and my last name.

[decy22]

yeah, been there. "Mr", "sir", "person"... all artificial entities. all corporation titles. they get you with just that. It's a tricky game of deceit.

[girlphriend]

i thought "mr" was a legal title? no?

[rjohson]

i dont know Anabloic says that when you answer to the title Mr.; then you automatically subject yourself under the court's jurisdiction;

[decy22]

you are correct. the question is... what is a legal title? what does it mean when you associate yourself with a legal title. what's the difference between being called Mary Smith vs. Mrs. Mary Smith in the legal system? they are clever bastards believe me.

[stvbw]

Mr is a legitimate title but not for a sovereign. The title Mr refers to a corporate entity as does "Mrs", "Ms" and "person". If you want to learn more of this check out my channel under "understanding your rights".

[RetSquid]

"MR." is an honorific and has no legal meaning at all.

[venuecam]

@ RetSquid: "Mr." is an admiral term just like "Dr.", "Officer", "Captain" etc. It's LEGAL speak. It is also UNLAWFUL as the term has nothing to do with LAW.

You say it is "honorific" then in the same sentence that it has no legal meaning. An honorific term is a LEGAL term. If you stated that in a court of Law you'd be charged with comtempt.

[RetSquid]

@venuecam

No, those are terms of address, they have no legal significance. It is not an 'admiral' term either. A honorific is just that, a title of honor that has no legal weight. If you brought up your argument in court YOU would laughed out of court.

[venuecam]

@ Ret: Incorrect.

[RetSquid]

@venuecam

Wrong.

[venuecam]

@Ret: honourific = admiralty. U can't pull the wool over ppls eyes mate. Working 4 the Navy has made water of ur brains.

I wouldn't argue it in a court. I wouldn't allow 2 b called a "Mr." I would refuse 2 "contract" with the judge by doing so. As soon as the judge realised I knew this then any case I was brought forth for would b dismissed. Why? Because without jurisdiction the court can't do jack. And if u don't know this then ur Naval position didn't mean jack either.

RottenSquids stink btw

[RetSquid]

@venuecam

"honourific = admiralty."

LOL!! How did you possibly come up with that?

You are correct, courts cannot do anything without jurisdiction, but none of what you say has anything to do with it. Jurisdiction is based on the law, location and offence, not some bs about made up titles or contract.

[venuecam]

Yawn.

When you wake up from your American dream-state call me at my direct number...

1-800-UR-A-SLAVE

[RetSquid]

@venuecam

Typical, all BS, no proof.

ps. Why do you have a "direct" number that claims that you are a slave? That is your number, not mine. LOL!!!

[venuecam]

@ RottenSquid: But U R A SLAVE RottenSquid. It's ok though. I won't wake you up. There there xx

Eww something stinks. It smells like ROTTEN SQUID. Ew.

[h4ppychap]

@girlphriend yup legal title...not a lawful one. You need to stop out of the legal system and stop in the lawful one, common law.

[decy22]

This was brave but I'm afraid they got you on the first sentence when she called you "Mr'. they are deceitful bastards indeed and "mr", "sir","person" all have a specific meaning in the courts. It gives them Jurisdiction. notice how many times she says "mr" in this video. that's not by chance.

[rjohson]

has long as you challenge jurisdiction the have no jurisdiction; they can not ignore jurisdictional challenges.

[seraphimra]

@decy22 Could you elaborate further on this? Thanks.

[grant2225]

@decy22 what are those meanings?

[marshallone]

BTW, I have proven this in a Court on the Land known as the united States. It was a court of record and I did it more then 6 moths ago with no further contact from the judge, no warrants, no fines, no plea, no nothing. I know it works, but you have to know who you are and not let them title you in any way or you will lose.

[jaffijaffer]

copy right your strawman and file this before you enter the court, the fact that you will not be contracting with the court unless you have notarised permission, all of this should have been settled before he entered and he would hve neutralised her before he got there.

[embers17]

Rick has got it. John handled this all wrong. His intentions are noble but his actions are misguided. He will never get a remedy with his methods.

[oiwhynot]

NSW Premier Nathan Rees doesnt want to give police a fare payrise and protect their death and disability cover.

PLEASE google KEEP OUR COPS and support us by joining our website.

Over 60,000 people have signed it.

Thank you

[Snurdgerbly]

"a fare payrise"? They use public transport? I had an employer who paid my fares to work, which I thought was very fair.

[decy22]

Sweet

[WONDOCTORJ]

NICE

[jaffijaffer]

go on mr wilson.

[marshallone]

BTW, these are not courts of common law, so if you grant them jurisdiction, you step out of common law and into Admiralty. newgtguy is correct, tell them they have no policitcal jurisdiction on the record, over YOU and walk the hell out, do not get into a conversation, just leave.

[RICK360000]

these are the words he should have used . When his name was called he should have said I claim common Law Jurisdiction . They usually ignore you when you say it but say it anyways . The charges are read then they will ask you to plea . At this time the words I do not consent and waive all benefit should be spoken and if need be enter the judges judicial oath into evidence

[RICK360000]

If she enters the plea then she must stand against the charges

[newgtguy]

100% correct. Never give them jurisdiction with a plea.

[marshallone]

Yep, and since only a DEFENDANT can enter a plea, if the Judge enters one for her, the judge is now the DEFENDANT, get that on the record and see what happens!?!?!

[marshallone]

DO NOT LET THEM CALL YOU MISTER! That is a legal title and when you answer to it, you are submitting to her letting you TITLE YOU! Dont let them call you Sir, Mister, NOTHING but a man standing on dry land and not subject to thier jurisdiction. Watch the antiterroist videos, he explains everything.

[newgtguy]

This is patriot nonsense.

Contracts are all about terms and conditions. If these have not been presented the contact is not valid.

Remember, the biggest disinformation agent is the government.

[marshallone]

Since I never signed any contracts with the Governement with full disclosure, they are VOID. I am no patriot while some who are patriots claim similar, that is not what I am saying. Contacts can be IMPLIED as can jurisdiction. If you do not even know what something as basic as inmlied legal title is, you will contiune to lose, be called back to court and recharged. Never consent to let them title you or they have jurisdiction. I have proven this in court.

[newgtguy]

I completely agree with your statement. Any implied contract is valid until disputed. The part I disagree with is the "mister" argument.

The first thing I say when I get in front of a judge is "We have an issue of Political Jurisdiction to discuss. Show me where I've volunteered into the artificial entity called the U.S.?"

I know they can't thus, I say "I'll take your silence as you have no proof." Then I walk out. I have friends stay behind. Dismissed every time.

Good luck my friend.

[marshallone]

Agreed. I do the same thing with police, and send them a bill for my time, as I always ask "Do you accept full commercial liablity in claiming I have to do anything you say in order to practice my common law rights?" If they accept, they get billed, if they do not accept, "Then we do not have an agreement good bye."

They want to do business with me, they will pay with the very god they serve $. Good luck and peace to you, brother.

[RICK360000]

When you plead not guilty is that not a contract with the court to prove your . By standing up and answering the court when your name is called, unless you notify them otherwise , you create joinder where you connect your human being to their fictional person

[ytgetter8758]

Seems to me that he blew it by ansering to Mr. He was in dishonour. I think its very difficult to do the right thing without a lot of practice because its like being a fish out of water.

[newgtguy]

Incorrect. Read my response above.

[JUZ75V]

I think this Magistrate let a crim off a Goods in Custody charge because the crim "didnt know the item was stolen"???The victim was present at court and there was video evidence of the item being stolen by the crims mate. Some of the Magistrates are filth.

[crazyeddie31]

yah signzit i have decided that i wont talk to any "judge" unless i invoke his/her oath of office. i hear this puts them in the proper common law jurisdiction and forces them to follow the "law" instead of the "statutes"

(havent tried it yet but will soon)

[Signzit]

Winston says,"I am making a Special Appearance AS Mr. Wilson and I am assurity in this matter.Reserving all Rights & Without Prejudice UNDER YOUR UCC 1-207 & UCC 1-308"

ALSO, He did not ask weather the judge had an "Oath of Office" and if so, The court must recognize or "Take Judaical Notice of the (Her) Oath" This way you move the judge into your jurisdiction. Known as removing "Judicial Discretion". Now only matters of record are in affect. Agents can't give testimony to facts, period!

[PhillipOrion]

you know your stuff. how come millions haven't been entertained by shrouts knowledge?

[tanksloan]

He made two HUGE mistakes during that..

First of all he admitted to being a corporate fiction and property of the government when he answered 'yes' to her 'are you mr wilson?' question. She proposed a contract and he accepted. Then he was arguing with the judge, which you never do; Ask Questions instead!

[PhillipOrion]

glad to see others learning this knowledge.

[Gromitdog1]

Yes, here in canada i got to question 6 before the 'judge' cut me off and began answering his questions for me. Its a sham any way you slice it.

[williamwagener]

From CA. , USA Go Wilson... but, I think you should have filed a motion for JURY

with the CLERK of the Court. she also does not understand Common Law jurisdiction.

. .

. . .

[williamwagener]

Magistrate... does not seem to understand "jury" "no jury" is she nutz?

[rhinobarrows]

John,

Do you live in Australia?

[acaycomau]

Dear SkoRoyal,

I've told them that I'm a free man of flesh and blood and they have no jurisdiction over me. That's just one of the elements to challenging the jurisdiction...all of which they totally disregard and refuse to answer any questions. Their arrogance has to be seen to be believed.

John Wilson

[SkoRoyal]

He should have said he was Jhon Wilson a Natrual living individual and not a statutorily defined person, when she asked him his name. Him answering to the strawman (name in all caps) is grounds for jurisdiction. She also gave him another court date... He should have refused to participate, for it would be a violation of the law for him to participate in a quasi-court of incompetent, improper jurisdiction.