His presentation of the fait accompli of the Mark fragment is deliberately deceitful.
Whilst there is strong argument for the fragment being from Mark, there are many issues with it being so, and for this man to stand in front of an audience with a fraudulent claim based on misrepresentation of the evidence and to ignore the facts of the matter is a disgrace.
For many of the commenters below, please dont be so one sided, open your mind and heart to the truth and you will find it. Trust me, it takes MUCH MUCH MUCH more faith to believe in mans ever changing scientific theories. No, the earth is not flat, seek TRUTH..
@nexusontop No, the video was a complete distortion of the facts. If you rely on biased people to educate you then you get a biased education.
The dead sea scrolls are on line. Read them and learn. Do not take his word or mine.
The scrap of Mark that he twisted to fit his need reads "for they had not understood about the loaves; their hearts were hardened. When they had crossed over, they landed at Gennesaret and anchored there."
Anyone who actually studies manuscripts can attest that no two manuscripts in existence are completely identical. He claims that Isaiah is more or less identical to the Aleppo Codex, one of the most authoritative manuscripts. It's interesting that he uses this example to make his case that the Bible hasn't changed, because there's another Isaiah scroll found at Qumran with several differences. He would not have been able to make such a profound statement if he used the book of Samuel instead.
There has been some requests for providing examples of how the text of the Bible has changed. One example is that the Greek Septuagint version of Jeremiah is approximately 1/8 longer than any Hebrew version. The DSS version of Samuel adds a host of material to any other version in existence, including an entire paragraph on King Nahash. If you are interested in seeing just how the Bible is different acc. to the DSS, there is a book by Martin Abegg et al. titled "The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible."
Let's get this straight. They find one word from "the time of the new testament" and that is proof? On the 7Q5 fragment in question only 25 full letters are visibile and it being from Mark is rejected by virtually every serious archealogist and NT scholar. Search for 7Q5 on bible dot org.
This guy is a geologist, he should leave New Testament history to the historians.
This does actually have a real source. Read the whole "Significant to the Canon of the Bible" part. There are two sources marked 21 and 22.
There is no excuse for you Christians and Jews. How can you possibly refute this?
Seriously, why do all you Christians and Jews say the scroll prove your point? It completely destroys your point. The Isaiah Scroll? That is only one out of 220 scrolls found. What about all the changes in the other ones? Sometimes the changes were "DRASTIC".
Ha, ha, what an absolute JOKE this is. The Dead Sea Scrolls prove just how WRONG the Bible is. The Vatican and the filthy pedohiles who run it, have PIMPED your mind on the issue. Read REAL scholarly works like the ONLY honest member of the original translation team John Allegro. The scrolls do NOT in any way prove the New Testament, as they are all Old Testament related anyway. The Teacher mentioned in the scrolls may have been a model for the biblical Jesus, but they do NOT prove the Bible.
@EducatedRebellion101 Did you know that Ancient Hebraic practice was to call a book of scripture by the first word of that book? Psalms 22 was written 1000yrs before Christ. At that time, crucifixion hadn't been invented as a torturous death yet.
Do you remember His dying words? "Father, why have you forsaken me" :o)
Every Jew there knew what He was saying. Every Jew there knew that He just announced that they were witnessing Psalm 22. :o) The OT is riddled with prophecy of Him.
I have red hair and green eyes. My birthday is 6-6 and my mother's birthday is 8-22. In 2006 the world was supposed to end on both of our birthdays. I am The Chosen One from The Dead Sea Scrolls. The Best Friend and Son of God. Byron Heath Shavers, 1-256-599-7558, Route 2, Box 127B, Section, Jackson County, Alabama, 6518, County Road 19, Drag Strip Road, 35771.
Now it is proven beyond any doubt that adam was made out of mud, and eva from one of his ribs. That god created the universe(s) OUT of NOTHING. Wonderful !!!
"which is that the scriptures do not and have not changed one bit" Of course scriptures have changed? You're joking right? I doubt Atheists have claimed that scriptures have been all changed around radically, but they have NO DOUBT been changed over the generations and changed to fit an agenda, but you go on being ignorant , what do I care-good luck!
@jinkyfc You could start by reading the dead sea scrolls, which are after all what the videos are about.
And you will plainly sea that the scrolls modfy the bible as we know it. They simply serve to prove that the bible was a constantly edited and redacted collection of stories.
Well, don't celebrate your invisible sugar daddy too quickly! I suspect the finding of the Scrolls will prove NOTHING except more wishful corrupt Christians will surface with yet another(one of many) scam!
It has alreadyh prioven something astounding, which is that the scriptures do not and have not changed one bit, which atheists love to claim. Just one more example of an atheist claim that has been kicked to the curb.
@NephilimFree It's Christian scholars who found over 200,00 errors in the King James bible. This huckster is talking about theHebrew Torah scrolls not the KJB
@NephilimFree You obviously have not read the dead sea scrolls, as I have. The unequivocally prove that the bible has been edited and redacted. Had you bothered reading them you would know that they are in part a criticism of the transcribed bible as it existed at the time.
But I know you do not bother reading anything apart from dodgy websites (yes I have seen your favourites list) and prefer to block anyone that questions your deluded worldview.
@NephilimFree Wipe my mouth? And I thought you were a christian. But then of course you are not because your jesus said if your eye offends you should pluck it out, and we all know what websites you like to wath.
Thanks for this series bro. Very informative and revealing of the motives of Bible correctors.
Heb:11:37: They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented;
8: (Of whom the world was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.
His presentation of the fait accompli of the Mark fragment is deliberately deceitful.
Whilst there is strong argument for the fragment being from Mark, there are many issues with it being so, and for this man to stand in front of an audience with a fraudulent claim based on misrepresentation of the evidence and to ignore the facts of the matter is a disgrace.
Huttate1 9 months ago
For many of the commenters below, please dont be so one sided, open your mind and heart to the truth and you will find it. Trust me, it takes MUCH MUCH MUCH more faith to believe in mans ever changing scientific theories. No, the earth is not flat, seek TRUTH..
nexusontop 10 months ago
I pray for all people to seek truth.. God provides us with factual evidence for those who seek. Great video,
nexusontop 10 months ago
@nexusontop No, the video was a complete distortion of the facts. If you rely on biased people to educate you then you get a biased education.
The dead sea scrolls are on line. Read them and learn. Do not take his word or mine.
The scrap of Mark that he twisted to fit his need reads "for they had not understood about the loaves; their hearts were hardened. When they had crossed over, they landed at Gennesaret and anchored there."
I am afraid that does not prophecise anything.
Huttate1 9 months ago
Anyone who actually studies manuscripts can attest that no two manuscripts in existence are completely identical. He claims that Isaiah is more or less identical to the Aleppo Codex, one of the most authoritative manuscripts. It's interesting that he uses this example to make his case that the Bible hasn't changed, because there's another Isaiah scroll found at Qumran with several differences. He would not have been able to make such a profound statement if he used the book of Samuel instead.
ramsa026 11 months ago
There has been some requests for providing examples of how the text of the Bible has changed. One example is that the Greek Septuagint version of Jeremiah is approximately 1/8 longer than any Hebrew version. The DSS version of Samuel adds a host of material to any other version in existence, including an entire paragraph on King Nahash. If you are interested in seeing just how the Bible is different acc. to the DSS, there is a book by Martin Abegg et al. titled "The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible."
ramsa026 11 months ago
Let's get this straight. They find one word from "the time of the new testament" and that is proof? On the 7Q5 fragment in question only 25 full letters are visibile and it being from Mark is rejected by virtually every serious archealogist and NT scholar. Search for 7Q5 on bible dot org.
This guy is a geologist, he should leave New Testament history to the historians.
jimmo42 11 months ago
The DSS are the same as the Tanakh, NOT the same as the Christian OT and contain NOTHING of the NT.
Matthew1944 1 year ago
This does actually have a real source. Read the whole "Significant to the Canon of the Bible" part. There are two sources marked 21 and 22.
There is no excuse for you Christians and Jews. How can you possibly refute this?
Seriously, why do all you Christians and Jews say the scroll prove your point? It completely destroys your point. The Isaiah Scroll? That is only one out of 220 scrolls found. What about all the changes in the other ones? Sometimes the changes were "DRASTIC".
Raisonic 1 year ago
Ha, ha, what an absolute JOKE this is. The Dead Sea Scrolls prove just how WRONG the Bible is. The Vatican and the filthy pedohiles who run it, have PIMPED your mind on the issue. Read REAL scholarly works like the ONLY honest member of the original translation team John Allegro. The scrolls do NOT in any way prove the New Testament, as they are all Old Testament related anyway. The Teacher mentioned in the scrolls may have been a model for the biblical Jesus, but they do NOT prove the Bible.
EducatedRebellion101 1 year ago
@EducatedRebellion101 Did you know that Ancient Hebraic practice was to call a book of scripture by the first word of that book? Psalms 22 was written 1000yrs before Christ. At that time, crucifixion hadn't been invented as a torturous death yet.
Do you remember His dying words? "Father, why have you forsaken me" :o)
Every Jew there knew what He was saying. Every Jew there knew that He just announced that they were witnessing Psalm 22. :o) The OT is riddled with prophecy of Him.
ThisIsMySockAccount 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have red hair and green eyes. My birthday is 6-6 and my mother's birthday is 8-22. In 2006 the world was supposed to end on both of our birthdays. I am The Chosen One from The Dead Sea Scrolls. The Best Friend and Son of God. Byron Heath Shavers, 1-256-599-7558, Route 2, Box 127B, Section, Jackson County, Alabama, 6518, County Road 19, Drag Strip Road, 35771.
TheChosenOneSonOfGod 2 years ago
Now it is proven beyond any doubt that adam was made out of mud, and eva from one of his ribs. That god created the universe(s) OUT of NOTHING. Wonderful !!!
lizazoon 2 years ago
Thank you so much for posting this!
I had never heard that there was manuscripts of the NT in the Dead Sea Scrolls and in Greek.
Too bad that the 7th cave colapsed, but God knows what he is doing.
biblia2016 2 years ago
"which is that the scriptures do not and have not changed one bit" Of course scriptures have changed? You're joking right? I doubt Atheists have claimed that scriptures have been all changed around radically, but they have NO DOUBT been changed over the generations and changed to fit an agenda, but you go on being ignorant , what do I care-good luck!
99minerkc 2 years ago
please show me how they have changed compared to older manuscripts
jinkyfc 2 years ago
@jinkyfc You could start by reading the dead sea scrolls, which are after all what the videos are about.
And you will plainly sea that the scrolls modfy the bible as we know it. They simply serve to prove that the bible was a constantly edited and redacted collection of stories.
Huttate1 9 months ago
I also concur with jinkyfc. Please show in a single way. Just one way how they have changed
micfoe73 2 years ago
Bless you for posting this video.
Oallos1 3 years ago
bless you for the support and blessing :)
jinkyfc 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Speculation,fantasy, wishful thinking. The bible disproves itself.
Philos2006 3 years ago
Praise God for revealing this. This proves that the Bible is unchanged, is prophetic, and disproves so many false atheistic arguments.
Praise the LORD Jesus.
1wingsolja 3 years ago
Yes thanks. This is wonderful information that blows the doors off of atheism.
NephilimFree 3 years ago 6
Well, don't celebrate your invisible sugar daddy too quickly! I suspect the finding of the Scrolls will prove NOTHING except more wishful corrupt Christians will surface with yet another(one of many) scam!
99minerkc 2 years ago
It has alreadyh prioven something astounding, which is that the scriptures do not and have not changed one bit, which atheists love to claim. Just one more example of an atheist claim that has been kicked to the curb.
NephilimFree 2 years ago 3
@NephilimFree It's Christian scholars who found over 200,00 errors in the King James bible. This huckster is talking about theHebrew Torah scrolls not the KJB
thruthem 1 year ago
@NephilimFree You obviously have not read the dead sea scrolls, as I have. The unequivocally prove that the bible has been edited and redacted. Had you bothered reading them you would know that they are in part a criticism of the transcribed bible as it existed at the time.
But I know you do not bother reading anything apart from dodgy websites (yes I have seen your favourites list) and prefer to block anyone that questions your deluded worldview.
Huttate1 9 months ago
@Huttate1 You idiot. Scholars of the biblical texts say the very opposite, because the opposte of your mouthy diareah is the truth. Wipe your mouth.
NephilimFree 9 months ago
@NephilimFree Wipe my mouth? And I thought you were a christian. But then of course you are not because your jesus said if your eye offends you should pluck it out, and we all know what websites you like to wath.
Huttate1 9 months ago
Thanks for this series bro. Very informative and revealing of the motives of Bible correctors.
Heb:11:37: They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented;
8: (Of whom the world was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.
kjvonly01 3 years ago 3
AMEN!!
Jim
BARNUMandBENTLEY 3 years ago 2