@everyone It's not about differences in intellect, between Dawkins and Gould. The difference is that Gould supports a hierarchical theory of selection, that encompasses changes on many levels, with no one level acting in primacy. He calls for a theory of macro evolution that recognizes that. Dawkins is basically a gene selectionist, i.e. he supports a theory of macro evolution that begins at the genic level and moves "up".
Gould was a great science writer and biologist. It's a shame that Gould, Ernst Mayr, W.D Hamiltion & John Maynard-Smith all died recently, Dawkins, E.O Wilson & James Watson are also not getting any younger. I wonder where the next generation of science writers will come from...
@GreenlandCat you are an ignorant fool if you claim Dawkins is nowhere near as smart as Gould. Being that I have read both of their works and is familiar with both of them, they both have intellects about equal.
I prefer Edw. Forbes F.R.S. to all. Now there was a naturalist.
uncljoedoc 3 months ago
Comment removed
uncljoedoc 3 months ago
Comment removed
uncljoedoc 3 months ago
@everyone It's not about differences in intellect, between Dawkins and Gould. The difference is that Gould supports a hierarchical theory of selection, that encompasses changes on many levels, with no one level acting in primacy. He calls for a theory of macro evolution that recognizes that. Dawkins is basically a gene selectionist, i.e. he supports a theory of macro evolution that begins at the genic level and moves "up".
Kyrin206 11 months ago
Comment removed
Kyrin206 11 months ago
Gould was a great science writer and biologist. It's a shame that Gould, Ernst Mayr, W.D Hamiltion & John Maynard-Smith all died recently, Dawkins, E.O Wilson & James Watson are also not getting any younger. I wonder where the next generation of science writers will come from...
STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 1 year ago
@STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 sorry but dawkins is nowhere
as smart as gould and certainly not on the same level
GreenlandCat 1 year ago
@GreenlandCat you are an ignorant fool if you claim Dawkins is nowhere near as smart as Gould. Being that I have read both of their works and is familiar with both of them, they both have intellects about equal.
fcdog555 1 year ago