Added: 1 year ago
From: sirenbrian
Views: 5,320
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I prefer Edw. Forbes F.R.S. to all. Now there was a naturalist.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @everyone It's not about differences in intellect, between Dawkins and Gould. The difference is that Gould supports a hierarchical theory of selection, that encompasses changes on many levels, with no one level acting in primacy. He calls for a theory of macro evolution that recognizes that. Dawkins is basically a gene selectionist, i.e. he supports a theory of macro evolution that begins at the genic level and moves "up".

  • Comment removed

  • Gould was a great science writer and biologist. It's a shame that Gould, Ernst Mayr, W.D Hamiltion & John Maynard-Smith all died recently, Dawkins, E.O Wilson & James Watson are also not getting any younger. I wonder where the next generation of science writers will come from...

  • @STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 sorry but dawkins is nowhere

    as smart as gould and certainly not on the same level

  • @GreenlandCat you are an ignorant fool if you claim Dawkins is nowhere near as smart as Gould. Being that I have read both of their works and is familiar with both of them, they both have intellects about equal.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more