what's the point of having so many nations on earth. the fewer nations the better. it would be best if all nation united together into a singal nation.
@Trustno1diot well if there is only one nation left one earth, there wouldn't be any wars any more. why? cuz who the hell are you suppose to fight if you are the only one left? humanity only needs one nation so all of humanity can be united. if we are united we will advance much faster in science.
why don't you study Bahá'í? well you don't have to if you don't want.
Humanity must learn respect for all kind of differences (ethnical, linguistic, cultural, religious...) to get to peace. If you delete all the differences, the only thing humanity will learn is that who is different is dangerous (and this is the first step to intollerance, racism and nazism)...
Differences are the key to peace, not the obstacle
Should I respect who doesn't respect human rights?
1) Capitalism judges people due to their possibility of producing, buying, selling, consuming and being consumed, no matter if they are trated like human or beasts or objects.
2) Communism brought the worst dictatorships in the world (USSR, North-Korea, Jugoslavia, People's Republic of China, Cuba...) due to their ideas of violent revolution and total elimination of the "people's enemies" to reach a phantomatic "workers' paradise".
4) My idea of a world where people respects different people doesn't include (of course) nazis and terrorist. Why not? Because if it did, people wouldn't respect different people.
5) Then, you propose a united world with one country, one language, one culture, one creed, where people are totally equal. Why? As you said before, because there would be nothing to argue or fight or even kill, there would be only peace.
@Yamatopetro I'll admit that I used to agree with this idea (I grew up with "Imagine) but then I've changed my mind and I came to the conclusion that omologation won't save humanity. It will only create a generation of spoiled children that will never learn why hating differences is wrong.
6) When I talk about differences, I mean every thing (temper, ethnicity, religion, language, culture...) that makes me ME and not THAT GUY. Are you REALLY sure that a world where every man, woman, child has the same temper, same ethnicity, same creed, same language and same point of view would be the perfect world?
@Trustno1diot Thank You!!! finally someone with the cahones to say that amongst all the trolling and hate amongst different beliefs on the internet... you sir get my upvote
@veganisextremelygood right and then china and north korea have an excuse to attack the "imperialist american pigs" and all of their buddies-.- when communism falls in china tibet will be free...
@Trustno1diot True communism is not bad. "Leninism, stalinism, sovietism" are really the worst interpretations of Marx's ideas. I preffer a not caítalist/not communism paradigm. Distributism? Yes, but it will be in essence capitalist.A good mixture it will be economic rights of communism and civil rights of capitalism. Free Tibet! Free China!
@shuomethe that may be by your observation. but the larger point is that communism only oppresses everyone no matter to what degree of status. oppression is oppression. communism is nothing but a cancer that needs to be eradicated like the desease it is. the people who are so passionate about freeinf tibet should be equally passionate about freeing china. more so, they should be passionate about freeing all of asia thats under communist control.
@bigblondman1 No it shouldn't, and i'm not saying that because i'm saying PRC is better but its just the ROC and PRC are equally corrupt. If China every gets reuinified and new form of government must be created.
by comparison if those two were the only choices i would still rather have the r.o.c. over the p.r.c. communism is a desease that needs to be eradicated. the r.o.c. has made great strides in forming democratic rule on taiwan. they deserve much credit for that. no gov is perfect. the r.o.c is far more tolerant than the p.r.c.. taiwan would be much worse if the p.r.c. took over. taiwan should be grateful the r.o.c has been ruling and protecting it this well this long. free china and tibet!
@bigblondman1 You would think that but both countries are exactly the same. Taiwanese people are nicer but still really both government have gapping flaws in them. Half the building in Taiwan are crumbling because the government can't be rat assed to refurbish them. So many people say stuff before they have the full grasp of the situation.
youre putting words in my mouth. i never said they are both the same i said by comparison the r.o.c. is better than the pr.c. i believe if the p.r.c. was controlling taiwan it would be worse. i have an excellent grasp of the situation. i keep in contact with people on taiwan and hong kong. also in the u.s. at the unofficial consulate offices here. the r.o.c is democratic. the p.r.c. is communist. taiwan people would rather have the r.o.c then p.r.c . by a vast majority according to recent polls
@bigblondman1 And you make out the communists as the worst people on earth. Sure the Ccp doesn't treat the tibetians with any honour nor respect however complaining on a youtube video won't change china, nor will speculation of with government is better. The only way things will change is if the chinese start a movement with encompasses all ethnicities in to a movement to bring down the government. And tibet is kinda a complicated situation for china.
why are you arguing with me. im on your side. i dont want the ccp in tibet or china. im expressing myself here as much as you. the ccp economy will collapse. that will cause more upheaveal then there is now. thats how all ethnicities will come together in protest. then free elections will occur and then a democratic gov will arise and eventually unify all parties and people under democratic rule. but the ccp must go first. they are the worst of all. they caused there own people to suffer.
@bigblondman1 Ccp won't collapse with in 100 years as long as there are consumers i.e westerners China will continue as it is But frankly whatever happens, its not up to me.
its not up to me either. the ccp will have to collapse in order for true democracy and unity in china to take place. i just happen to believe from the sources that i have in taiwan, hong kong and academia, as well as poiltical. that it will happen economically in a short time. they are a bubble waiting to burst. it wont take 100 years. the ccp is export and import based. they are not consumer based. they have much real estate that is lying dormant. no one can afford to buy or rent it. cont.
@Saitothesushi cont. its only because the ccp has a mountain of money that they can still subsidize most businesess and devalue their currency and still keep things rather stable but they are on borrowed time. that time will run out. no amount of money used as recklessly as they are using it can last forever. its a matter of time and a short time not 100 years. it will continue as it is but not for very long. they are on a slippery slope economically.when it happens then democracy will reign.
@Saitothesushi for that matter neither will youre opinions change anything either. im just saying that based on what i know from people there, scholars, and diplomats. the ccp is a borne evil. they imposed themselves on an unsuspecting populous. the people fell for the decpetion and suffered greatly for it. there are protests now all over china but there will be much more when the ccp economy falls. im very much in favor of what you say. but that can only be accomplished when the ccp falls.
once the ccp falls, free elections can be held and all parties on taiwan would take part in the process. i believe the kmt would prevail on the mainland once the ccp dissolves itself out of existance which will happen once their economic bubble bursts. they will have to do that. they are simply too arrogant to admit it but its true. the kmt is the true republic of china of dr. sun yat sen it has made itself into a stable democratic gov. and china will be better off with them. r.o.c. is china
The sad truth is that PRC holds the whole world tight in its dirty,nasty hands,wet with the blood of MILLIONS of innocent people. Nobody does anything to help Tibet (=nobody having the POWER to do it) because,quite simply, they do NOT want to do anything..against the Chinese Empire! Triste veritas, sed veritas..
DHARAMSHALA, September 18: China last year announced its very own version of a global peace awards as a riposte to the Norwegian Nobel Committee’s decision to honour Chinese dissident Liu Xiabao.
But the first Confucius peace prize proved to be a damp squib as its maiden winner failed to appear for the award ceremony.
@realisticsocialist You do realize that Tibet was a theocracy much like post-revolutionary Iran before the Chinese took over? And you do realize that, under Tibetan law, every Tibetan was the personal property, or 'slave', of the Dalai Lama? And pray tell, I hope you do know that the vast majority of Tibetans were destitute before the 1950s, because the persons of spiritual importance amassed all the wealth and power?
Be realistic here; China has enforced a reverse imperialist agenda.
the tibetan people apparrantly prefer a theocracy more than communist oppression. the point is they should be allowed to have what they prefer. the ccp imposed itself upon tibet. the people never chose it. china was even more destitute when the commies took over, also tibet was worse off. communism, simply doesnt work for the benefit of the majority. it only works for the people who control it. it serves the masters not the enslaved. the ccp needs to dissolve forever. i hope soon.
Shut up. Tibet is China. CHINA HAS ALREADY LOST OUTER MANCHURIA TO RUSSIA, LOST SOUTHERN TIBET TO INDIA, LOST PART OF ITS TERRITORY TO NORTH KOREA, SOME ISLANDS TO JAPAN, EVEN GIVEN SOME TERRITORY TO CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES. Would United States be that generous? You colonizers have no right to criticize because all you did is killing Native Americans, killing Mexicans and behave like a robber in Hawaii.
Prior to the Communist invasion in 1950 Tibet was an independent country, with its own language, its own culture, its own passports, its own legitimate internationally recognized government, its own army, its own separate history and its own distinct traditions. Tibet is not China, anymore than Algeria is France or India is Britain. Tibet has been colonized by communists but will soon regain its freedom!
@TheTollundWoman You should learn history. I admit so-called invasion, but that's far before 1950s. Since Qing Dynasty(18th century), Tibet has been part of China. Anyway, you can condemn communism because sometimes it is really annoying, but splitting the country is intolerable because it's there.
The Qing dynasty never attempted the destruction of Tibetan culture and society, burned monastaries or forced religious leaders into exile, or starved millions of people to death, or imprisonedthousands of Tibetans simply for speaking their own language and continuing their own culture. The Qing dynasty in fact allowed a large amount of autonomy. whereas the CCP is attempting cultural genocide
@TheTollundWoman And may I remind you that Tibet's history has mostly been violent, not the usual image of a shangri-la you're used to. And infact, these 'monasteries' were more like forts and the amount of monasteries that were destroyed during the course of Tibet's violent history overshadows the amount that were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution.
@TheBrolit Are you saying that chinese didnt destroy most of Tibets monasteries during the so called "cultural revolution"? PRC is pretty much doing a cultural genocide in tibet
@Vamutus Oh please, it's not genocide if the cultural destruction was universal and equally as deadly to any religious or spiritual settings that were deemed too oppressive of their followers.
Religion is the opiate of the people, and it just so happened that Tibet had a lot of mindless zombies following their god in human reincarnation.
thats your opinion and the opinion of others who dont believe. you should not impose your lack of belief on the people of tibet who do believe. the point is they should have what they prefer. they should not have a communist gov. or any gov. imposed on them. its your choice to not believe. its obviously not the tibetan peoples' choice., neither is communism. they are not imposing there will on you or anyone. but the commies are imposing themselves on tibet. thats just wrong, unfair, and unjust
@bigblondman1 It's kinda pointless to talk about the Tibetan separatist movement. The majority of its followers aren't even Tibetan born, only a bunch of overprivileged college activists.
My point was not to justify the act of invasion; it's to justify the occupation thereafter.To claim the occupation is unjust is to be hypocritical for any country that has ever embraced expansionism. And in reality, Tibet is not occupied. It's an autonomous province.
i understand. youre still missing a key point. whether you agree or not with the overpriviledged college activists they are demonstrating there right to express there belief as much as you have the same right. i dont believe its there intention to be hypocritical. they just are passionate about what they believe. tibet is occupied. the ccp imposed there presence. the people there never wanted the ccp. if tibet is autonomous then the ccp shouldnt be there imposing thats a contradiction.
@bigblondman1 "they are demonstrating there right to express there belief as much as you have the same right"
I'm not trying to stop them. We need more activists to get rid of the apathetic stagnation that is our political landscape. But while they can return home to a prepaid lifestyle supported by First World parents, the standard of living for Tibetans would drop drastically if these kids got their way.
"autonomous"
They are as autonomous as the First Nations of Canada, where I am from.
i meant they have the right as we all do. as autonomy goes canada is not communist. the ccp claims they allow autonomy in tibet, hong kong, macao and few other regions i cant name. the ccp presence is still felt and restrictive as always. autonomy under the ccp is a contradiction of terms. these so-called kids will not necessarily get there way. ultimately what i believe will happen is the ccp will dissolve through economic collapse. the bubble will burst then will democracy take place.
@bigblondman1 "as autonomy goes canada is not communist."
Autonomy has nothing to do with communist ideology. I used Canada as an example to show cultural minorities holding *some* autonomy within a country, just like Tibet does within China.
"ccp claims they allow autonomy"
*You* claim the ccp claims. In reality, the ccp *does*. Their only restriction on autonomous regions is to ban separatist movements. Everything, *Everything* else is controlled by local government officials.
i am older than you and remember the cold war at its peak. the cuban missle crisis for example. i am from a world that believes communism is the problem that is preventing democratic rule taking hold throughout the world. the difference is that communism imposes itself. democracy is encourages so other nations have the right of self determination without oppressive communism or ancient tribal rule that is also imposed and archaic today. communism simply doesnt work for the many only the few
just because you are critical of democracy doesnt make democracy wrong or corrupt. any gov. is as good or bad as the people who administer it. ive seen youre site. you are obviously a supporter of communism at least upon appearance. if you are indeed 20 yrs old then you frankly dont know much of what youre saying. yes, cuban missle crisis. the point being what right did the ussr. have to install missles in cuba and point them at the u.s.? none. thats simply arrogance.
@bigblondman1 "doesnt make democracy wrong or corrupt."
Just because you are critical of Fascism doesn't make Fascists wrong or corrupt. Do you see the inherent failure of your argument?
"if you are indeed 20 yrs old"
Do not patronize my age. I know plenty of child prodigies that could destroy adults such as yourself in both knowledge and wisdom. Age is never a factor in debate. Do not view yourself as the superior because you happened to live longer than me by a marginal degree.
im not going to keep arguing with you. you are bating me to continue this pointless diatribe. you dont want to understand just argue. i dont. im not patronizing you im asking you to confirm your real age. you are sounding quite childishly arrogant. yes, age is a factor because you cannot possess the same knowledge of the facts through actual experience if you arer so much younger. dont try to belitlle me by covering up you own lack of depth. i know what i know because ive lived it.
@bigblondman1 "you dont want to understand just argue."
How about you actually RESPOND to my ARGUMENTS and REFERENCES? I have been giving out examples post after post, and yet each time you reply, you always state that I am incorrect simply because you are 'older' and you 'know more than me'. This is pathetic! If you really want to ignore my arguments, at least stop insulting me with your baseless arrogance.
You're a real asshole, you know that? As soon as you unblock me, expect my replies.
the end of your reply just proved me right. you want to argue. i dont. see my point? im right. i told you why. youre arrogant, and antagonistic you have a lot to learn. youll never learn by trying to teach someone or me who knows more and better. you learn by listening you dont want to listen. its your statements that are based on your own anger, not knowledge. youll learn that someday. its called growing up. you even dare or demand i unblock you. LOL! why? ive heard enough. grow up first.
@bigblondman1 Congrats! I'm starting a new section titled, 'favorite quotations' on my channel! Thank you for your endlessly myopic inspiration!
By the way, the entire purpose of you originally attacking my comment on this wall was to incite debate (otherwise known as *argumentation*). When I present to you factual evidence supporting my side of the debate, you deliberately ignore them and instead focus on your supposed age 'superiority'. Nicely played.
@bigblondman1 "what right did the ussr. have to install missles in cuba"
Because Cuba, AS A SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE, **ALLOWED** nuclear missiles to be built on their OWN soil. WHAT RIGHT DOES THE UNITED STATES HAVE TO DICTATE WHAT CAN BE DONE IN CUBA? Was installing the Cuban dictator, Fulgencio Batista, not bad enough for Cuba that America must also threaten nuclear war against them?
Cuba wanted missiles to defend itself from people like you. Go search up the 'Bay of Pigs' invasion.
you dont get it. i lived it. if the u.s.did nothing about those missles the soviets would think the u.s. weak and easy to manipulate. the u.s. wouldnt tolerate communism forcing there way and threatening the u.s.. what the u.s.has in its arsenal is beside the point. the soviets had as much. but tried to impose themselves too close to the u.s. no, its not naive to say there are no democ. dictatorships. if there were then they're not democracies in the first place. your analogy is wrong.
Which precisely makes you extremely biased on this subject material. When you have been indoctrinated your entire life to fear the colour red, what hope do you have of seeing clearly?
"the soviets would think the u.s. weak and easy to manipulate."
You think the USSR would think that? Even while the USA has hundreds more nuclear devices than them? This was not an issue about manipulation - only about America wanting its vassal state back.
(contd) it was placing missles in cuba that provoked nuclear war. the u.s. dared them to use those missles and gave them an ultimatum. if the u.s. did nothing youd call them wimps. the ussr was daring the u.s and the u.s. called there bluff and the ussr blinked. even kruschchev was sweating. i see more clearly than you because ive been to the edge. before you were born we came an inch away from nuclear war. its only by buliding up and negotiating from strength that you can neutralize a bully
@bigblondman1 "it was placing missles in cuba that provoked nuclear war"
You're a myopic idiot. Even after I've explained in PARAGRAPHS, you still persist. There is nothing more that I can say but to advise you to search up the historical dates. Installment of Batista into power; Cuban Revolution; Operation Mongoose and Bay of Pigs Invasion; Cuban nuclear deal.
@bigblondman1 "the u.s. wouldnt tolerate communism forcing there way and threatening the u.s."
Are you serious? IT IS BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES ACTIVELY INVADED CUBA THAT CUBA EVEN WANTED MISSILES. COMMUNISM THREATENED THE UNITED STATES? CAPITALISM GAVE CUBA HUNDREDS OF YEARS OF SLAVERY, OPPRESSION, AND DICTATORIAL PUPPET REGIMES! WHICH CAME FIRST, AMERICAN INVASION OF CUBA, OR SOVIET INSTALLATION OF NUCLEAR DEVICES? By god, sir, I feel like I'm arguing with an arrogant preschooler.
yes serious. what has communism in cuba done? less slavery or more? how lucrative and solvent is cuba now? they rank at the bottom of the list economically. did communism save them at all? puppet regimes? what do you think cuba was under the ussr? by God sir, just how childishly ignorant can you be? if you are only 20 as your site says then you know nothing you misinterpret the facts to argue pointlessly. if you want to learn keep the mouth shut and ears open and learn child. dont argue.
Before Communism, Cuba was ruled by a United States appointed dictator. All of Cuba was designated towards growing fruit for American consumption, as well as providing cheap, factory labour without all of the labour laws on mainland USA. Tell me, is this slavery?
Is it slavery that now, Cuba has one of the best healthcare systems in the world, even though America still blockades them? Is it slavery that no Cuban is forced to sell themselves to live?
@bigblondman1 " how lucrative and solvent is cuba now?"
Cuba does not try to be lucrative. It tries to survive while the United States has active military personnel blockading Cuba's borders to halt any foreign trade.
Besides, Cuba has become a thousand times better than when it was under real slavery from American Imperialism.
" if you are only 20"
Once again, age is never a factor in debate. You think too highly of yourself.
@unifieddynasty I'm sorry, I don't see any convincing reason why the standard of living for ethnic Tibetans would fall in the long term if the CCP were overthrown. It would certainly be better for them than the extinction which is bound to result otherwise, like what imperial China caused to so many Turkic and other nations in what is now China in the past.
@TheHaeresiarch "standard of living for ethnic Tibetans would fall in the long term if the CCP were overthrown."
All of China's invested assets would be relinquished. They have their ways of making sure this becomes reality, should Tibet have the means to secede. Please tell me what a highly mountainous region, completely lacking in globalized trade and communication, will possibly do to raise its gross domestic and national product? Especially when it only has pre-industrialized means?
@unifieddynasty :my friend ,sometimes ..there are more important things to life than our conventional"global trade /GDP" way of life..such as a "GNH"(GROSS NATIONAL HAPPINESS eg:BHUTAN)what is the point of having an imaginable "standard of living"when the truth is that mankind is worseoff now in terms of genuine happiness then in the past .we've not only become slaves to a consumerist economy ,but we've also become murderers (environment,enxtinction of animals etc).peace of mind over materialism
Tibet's history is no more violent than the history of most nations. China's Communist government has murdered over 45 million people since 1949. Your argument is counterintuitive.
@TheTollundWoman Then I advise you to take some history lessons about Tibet. The amount of people that were 'murdered' were not intended to be 'murdered'. It was a result of bad policy, disease etc.
that is a very callous statement. "not intended to be murdered," that doesnt make the end results justified. you can relate that bad policy and desease to a communist gov. thats the point. the communists imposed there will on the tibetan people the ccp has much for which to answer. and they will answer indeed, and the result for them will not be pleseant. the commies are to blame for all the misery of asia. communism is a cancer on society that needs to be eradicated once and for all.
@TheTollundWoman your opinion is also counterintuitive. that doesnt justify the suffering that the communists have caused on there own people and the people of tibet. the commies are to blame for all of the misery of asia that part of the world would have been much better off if the nationalists under chiang kai-shek had won and then eventually transform themselves to a democratic gov like they now have on taiwan. if they would have won, mainland china would be a very large taiwan today. .
Ukraine got its independence from Russia, this was very controversial, but it wasn't "intolerable", the British had to give up Ireland and Inda, China will eventually have to give up control of Tibet. Colonies never remain colonies forever...
@TheTollundWoman You know what, Mongolia got independence from China and they abandoned Mongolians characters and writes Mongolians in Russian alphabets. Inner Mongolia of China still writes Mongolians now. If your logic is right, those multi-ethnic countries would have been in chaos because every race wants independence. There are lots of 'colonies' according to your logic. Texas, Hawaii, Okinawa in Japan, Sikkim in India, etc. You cant just help Tibetans, go help them.
@TheTollundWoman Who the hell told you about government is still practicing cultural genocide? You ever come to Tibet, or other part of China? Everybody is friendly to Tibetans.
Re: "everybody si friendly to Tibetans"...right, just like Deng Xiaoping was "friendly" to the protestors at Tiananmen...Communists are great at coming up with euphemisms, unfortunately the world knows the truth now...FREE TIBET AND DOWN WITH COMMUNISM
If China "lost part of its territory to North Korea", why is the CCP still funding Kim Jong Il, supplying his regime with fuel, and forcibly deporting refugees from the north? If north korea stole your land, why are they your allies?
@TheTollundWoman That is because Mao Zedong is not a wise guy. North Korea is really not an ally to most common Chinese, because the regime is more disgusting than Chinese government. If you want to say allies, I would say Pakistan is a good one.
@keanezheng1 SDFU!! Why SHOULD WE GIVE OUR COUNTRY TO YOU ?!! It's CALLED TIBET NOT CHINA U MORON. IF IT IS PART OF CHINA WHY IS NOT CALLED CHINA U FAG! TIBET FOR TIBETAN. WE HAVE OUR OWN LANGUAGE AND TRADITION. LEAVE US ALONE U NOOBAFAG.
@birdman631 ARE U FCKING STUPID OR JUST RETARD?!! When we agreed on me having the last say, U ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EVEN FCKING REPLY !! FFS U MORONIC BRID BRAIN!!!
manchuria is a region that should be as free as tibet and other autonomous regions. the sins of the u.s. in its history are very real. but beside the point. the reason for it was economic greed by corporate interests that were supported by republicans. u.s. voters can and do vote them out. china is obviously very different. it still about greed but from a direct gov. source because thats what communism does. it imposes itself on others and controls the economy. voters there cannot stop them
You've got to be kidding me! Manchurians are no longer an ethnic group. They have been mixed with the Han culture to a point of little distinction due to hundreds of years of empire building and one single dynasty. To even suggest that Manchuria break off from China is like saying Alaska isn't part of America because it was once colonized by Russians. One region of Manchuria, Heilongjiang, contains more Han Chinese than Canadians in Canada! This is a non-example.
fuck china for a free tibet!!!
MyPoketubing 1 week ago
@MyPoketubing take over the world for the better of mankind.
Yamatopetro 3 days ago
Dalai Lama Theocratic Serfdom, FUCK YEAH!
IchKommeAusVinland 1 week ago
how many monks must be lighted
before their land will be free?
the answer my friends is blowing in the wind
the answer my friends, is blowing in the wind...
Trustno1diot 3 weeks ago
free tibet!
greetings from south korea
dhksrksalem 4 weeks ago 2
fuck china......free tibet....
sourabhsh111 1 month ago
@sourabhsh111 Don't fuck China. Fuck the Communists.
cedricmeallan 1 week ago
@cedricmeallan Yeah ...Free TIBET...FUCK COMMIES...long live dalai lama
sourabhsh111 1 week ago
what's the point of having so many nations on earth. the fewer nations the better. it would be best if all nation united together into a singal nation.
Yamatopetro 1 month ago
@Yamatopetro deleting their identities?
no, thanks!!!
this is not the right path to peace
Trustno1diot 3 weeks ago
@Trustno1diot well if there is only one nation left one earth, there wouldn't be any wars any more. why? cuz who the hell are you suppose to fight if you are the only one left? humanity only needs one nation so all of humanity can be united. if we are united we will advance much faster in science.
why don't you study Bahá'í? well you don't have to if you don't want.
Yamatopetro 3 weeks ago
@Yamatopetro
Humanity must learn respect for all kind of differences (ethnical, linguistic, cultural, religious...) to get to peace. If you delete all the differences, the only thing humanity will learn is that who is different is dangerous (and this is the first step to intollerance, racism and nazism)...
Differences are the key to peace, not the obstacle
Trustno1diot 3 weeks ago
@Trustno1diot differences can also cause jealousy which will also leds to hate and racism. like a poor person who is jealous of a rich person.
Yamatopetro 3 days ago
@Yamatopetro No If you teach them to respect differences
Trustno1diot 3 days ago
@Trustno1diot well in that case why don't you respect communist and capitalist?
Yamatopetro 2 days ago
@Yamatopetro
Should I respect who doesn't respect human rights?
1) Capitalism judges people due to their possibility of producing, buying, selling, consuming and being consumed, no matter if they are trated like human or beasts or objects.
2) Communism brought the worst dictatorships in the world (USSR, North-Korea, Jugoslavia, People's Republic of China, Cuba...) due to their ideas of violent revolution and total elimination of the "people's enemies" to reach a phantomatic "workers' paradise".
Trustno1diot 4 hours ago
@Yamatopetro
2)[continues] this no matter how much people are exploited, brutalised and censored (see Tibet) to reach the final goal of the revolution
3) The real question you should have asked to me was:
===If you say that we should learn to respect differences, should we still respect nazis and terrorist?===
Trustno1diot 4 hours ago
@Yamatopetro
4) My idea of a world where people respects different people doesn't include (of course) nazis and terrorist. Why not? Because if it did, people wouldn't respect different people.
5) Then, you propose a united world with one country, one language, one culture, one creed, where people are totally equal. Why? As you said before, because there would be nothing to argue or fight or even kill, there would be only peace.
Trustno1diot 4 hours ago
@Yamatopetro I'll admit that I used to agree with this idea (I grew up with "Imagine) but then I've changed my mind and I came to the conclusion that omologation won't save humanity. It will only create a generation of spoiled children that will never learn why hating differences is wrong.
Trustno1diot 4 hours ago
@Yamatopetro
6) When I talk about differences, I mean every thing (temper, ethnicity, religion, language, culture...) that makes me ME and not THAT GUY. Are you REALLY sure that a world where every man, woman, child has the same temper, same ethnicity, same creed, same language and same point of view would be the perfect world?
Trustno1diot 25 minutes ago
@Trustno1diot Thank You!!! finally someone with the cahones to say that amongst all the trolling and hate amongst different beliefs on the internet... you sir get my upvote
crazycameraguy714 2 days ago
@Yamatopetro They're called "civil wars", "rebellions" and "domestic violence".
fedelede2 2 weeks ago
THIS ANTHEM SOUNDS LIKE THE POCAHONTAS MUSIC!
veganisextremelygood 2 months ago
MAYBE NATO WILL INTERFERE ONE DAY TO SEPARATE TIBET FROM CHINA!
veganisextremelygood 2 months ago
@veganisextremelygood right and then china and north korea have an excuse to attack the "imperialist american pigs" and all of their buddies-.- when communism falls in china tibet will be free...
ssoloness 2 months ago
@veganisextremelygood
Only if they'll discover there's oil in Tibet
Trustno1diot 1 month ago
@veganisextremelygood you think NATO wants to fight ww3 for tibet?
Yamatopetro 3 weeks ago
Must admit, Tibet's flag is amasing!
YesIamEccentric 2 months ago
tibet the turkvolk
TURKISHKINGERS 2 months ago
W tibet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2812Danito 3 months ago
Fuck off china you fake commies!
Ryuukiba7 4 months ago
awesome!
duke1647 4 months ago
the only good communist is a dead communist
free Tibet in free China!!!
Trustno1diot 4 months ago 18
@Trustno1diot True communism is not bad. "Leninism, stalinism, sovietism" are really the worst interpretations of Marx's ideas. I preffer a not caítalist/not communism paradigm. Distributism? Yes, but it will be in essence capitalist.A good mixture it will be economic rights of communism and civil rights of capitalism. Free Tibet! Free China!
IntelRyMSACorporatio 2 months ago
@Trustno1diot in soviet russia it's
the only good capitalist is a dead capitalist.
Yamatopetro 1 month ago
Comment removed
Trustno1diot 1 month ago
@Yamatopetro I'm also anticapitalist
Trustno1diot 1 month ago
@Trustno1diot ...你是一个白痴，你不知道你说什么！
(you're an idiot and do you not know what you say!)
李李少秦
LishaoQin1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LishaoQin1
Ok, I'm an idiot and Tibet and China are free.
So, why google is censored?
Why did those students protested in Tiananmen Square in 1989?
Why Chinese Women are not free of keeping more than one child?
Maybe I'm an idiot, but I STILL KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING!
Trustno1diot 1 month ago
You these idiots!you can ask a chinese,Who's higher status,I am a "han"people,today i tell you Tibet people higher status than "Han"people!
shuomethe 4 months ago
@shuomethe that may be by your observation. but the larger point is that communism only oppresses everyone no matter to what degree of status. oppression is oppression. communism is nothing but a cancer that needs to be eradicated like the desease it is. the people who are so passionate about freeinf tibet should be equally passionate about freeing china. more so, they should be passionate about freeing all of asia thats under communist control.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
free for tibet !
dhksrksalem 5 months ago
@dhksrksalem i agree. free china too. it should be like the r.o.c. on taiwan. hopefully soon it will be finally.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 No it shouldn't, and i'm not saying that because i'm saying PRC is better but its just the ROC and PRC are equally corrupt. If China every gets reuinified and new form of government must be created.
Saitothesushi 4 months ago
by comparison if those two were the only choices i would still rather have the r.o.c. over the p.r.c. communism is a desease that needs to be eradicated. the r.o.c. has made great strides in forming democratic rule on taiwan. they deserve much credit for that. no gov is perfect. the r.o.c is far more tolerant than the p.r.c.. taiwan would be much worse if the p.r.c. took over. taiwan should be grateful the r.o.c has been ruling and protecting it this well this long. free china and tibet!
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 You would think that but both countries are exactly the same. Taiwanese people are nicer but still really both government have gapping flaws in them. Half the building in Taiwan are crumbling because the government can't be rat assed to refurbish them. So many people say stuff before they have the full grasp of the situation.
Saitothesushi 4 months ago
youre putting words in my mouth. i never said they are both the same i said by comparison the r.o.c. is better than the pr.c. i believe if the p.r.c. was controlling taiwan it would be worse. i have an excellent grasp of the situation. i keep in contact with people on taiwan and hong kong. also in the u.s. at the unofficial consulate offices here. the r.o.c is democratic. the p.r.c. is communist. taiwan people would rather have the r.o.c then p.r.c . by a vast majority according to recent polls
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 And you make out the communists as the worst people on earth. Sure the Ccp doesn't treat the tibetians with any honour nor respect however complaining on a youtube video won't change china, nor will speculation of with government is better. The only way things will change is if the chinese start a movement with encompasses all ethnicities in to a movement to bring down the government. And tibet is kinda a complicated situation for china.
Saitothesushi 4 months ago
why are you arguing with me. im on your side. i dont want the ccp in tibet or china. im expressing myself here as much as you. the ccp economy will collapse. that will cause more upheaveal then there is now. thats how all ethnicities will come together in protest. then free elections will occur and then a democratic gov will arise and eventually unify all parties and people under democratic rule. but the ccp must go first. they are the worst of all. they caused there own people to suffer.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 Ccp won't collapse with in 100 years as long as there are consumers i.e westerners China will continue as it is But frankly whatever happens, its not up to me.
Saitothesushi 4 months ago
its not up to me either. the ccp will have to collapse in order for true democracy and unity in china to take place. i just happen to believe from the sources that i have in taiwan, hong kong and academia, as well as poiltical. that it will happen economically in a short time. they are a bubble waiting to burst. it wont take 100 years. the ccp is export and import based. they are not consumer based. they have much real estate that is lying dormant. no one can afford to buy or rent it. cont.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 And many people in Hong kong and taiwan depend of china.
Saitothesushi 4 months ago
@Saitothesushi cont. its only because the ccp has a mountain of money that they can still subsidize most businesess and devalue their currency and still keep things rather stable but they are on borrowed time. that time will run out. no amount of money used as recklessly as they are using it can last forever. its a matter of time and a short time not 100 years. it will continue as it is but not for very long. they are on a slippery slope economically.when it happens then democracy will reign.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@Saitothesushi for that matter neither will youre opinions change anything either. im just saying that based on what i know from people there, scholars, and diplomats. the ccp is a borne evil. they imposed themselves on an unsuspecting populous. the people fell for the decpetion and suffered greatly for it. there are protests now all over china but there will be much more when the ccp economy falls. im very much in favor of what you say. but that can only be accomplished when the ccp falls.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
once the ccp falls, free elections can be held and all parties on taiwan would take part in the process. i believe the kmt would prevail on the mainland once the ccp dissolves itself out of existance which will happen once their economic bubble bursts. they will have to do that. they are simply too arrogant to admit it but its true. the kmt is the true republic of china of dr. sun yat sen it has made itself into a stable democratic gov. and china will be better off with them. r.o.c. is china
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 you're right
dhksrksalem 4 months ago
@dhksrksalem thank you. i only hope and pray its the sooner the better.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
The sad truth is that PRC holds the whole world tight in its dirty,nasty hands,wet with the blood of MILLIONS of innocent people. Nobody does anything to help Tibet (=nobody having the POWER to do it) because,quite simply, they do NOT want to do anything..against the Chinese Empire! Triste veritas, sed veritas..
keltdevangel1 5 months ago
STOP CHINA!
TurkeyAlbaniaKosovo 5 months ago
FREE TIBET ALREADY!!
Dosai99 5 months ago
Freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Tibet :o)
IVANKASKY 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oops! China does it again
Phayul[Sunday, September 18, 2011 16:34]
DHARAMSHALA, September 18: China last year announced its very own version of a global peace awards as a riposte to the Norwegian Nobel Committee’s decision to honour Chinese dissident Liu Xiabao.
But the first Confucius peace prize proved to be a damp squib as its maiden winner failed to appear for the award ceremony.
dorje168 5 months ago
china only uses tibet to look geographically bigger, free tibet from soloman islands
ArwingFighter 6 months ago
@ArwingFighter Pretty muh. They think that the bigger the size, the better it is
TVgeinus90sSim 6 months ago
Free Tibet!!!
gaemannerheim 6 months ago
What a gorgeous flag! Long live Tibet!!!
hpwolf123 6 months ago
Thank you Lord Daine for this. As British Tibetan, I humbly thank you for this.
Nyiterow1 6 months ago
Free Tibet!!!
From the Czech Republic
czechspartan 6 months ago
Tibet deserves freedom. The Tibetan government in Exile is now ruled by Prime Minister Lobsang Sangay. He was freely elected this year.
thunderdragon14 7 months ago
西藏是中華民國的一部份，可以按照十四世達賴喇嘛的說法，建立高度自治的西藏。
tongxintongde201 7 months ago
何谓中国的一部分，自古以来隶属于中国中央政府管辖之下的地区都在当时都是中国（不同朝代）的一部分。自元朝设立宣政院开始，明朝，清朝都将西藏乃入了帝国版图，不过是高度自治但是主权属于中央政府。中华文化的主体是汉族文化，这点西藏的文化虽然受到汉族文化影响但是不属于中华文化圈，真正的中华文化圈书受到汉文化深刻影响的地区包括朝鲜，日本以及越南。而且“中华民族”这个是一个虚无的国族概念，实际上是符合政治需求所创造，实际上也不存在
hongzhou1 7 months ago
西藏為中華民國的一部分。反對西藏獨立，但希望西藏可在中華民國範圍內充分自治，不受壓迫。
Changxing1988 8 months ago
西藏從來就不是中國的一部分，歷朝歷代都沒把西藏納入正式版圖內，就算是中華民國也只是把它作為一個"地方"納入版圖。你可以說西藏地區是中華文化圈的一部分，或說藏族是中華民族的一部分，但不可強制說西藏是"中國"的一部分。
西藏問題原本很單純，只是中國與西藏兩者間的問題，可以談也可以互榮互助，就是討厭在"西方"與"外族"勢力作怪，而始作俑者就是那個千年老妖"英國殖民主義"。看看本篇的老外留言，其心態就很可議，不知道歷史因素就滿口胡言亂語，話說英國自己本身的蘇格蘭與北愛問題的衝突與矛盾並不比西藏問題少，英國佬們還是閉嘴吧! 家家有本難念的經。
但非常反感厭惡中共政權的血腥鎮壓西藏，中共不代表文明開放的中國，中共是馬列異族政權，與傳統中國的博愛背離，盼望藏族同胞不要因為中共而喪失了對中華民族的性任。
aahttp 8 months ago
Free Tibet, yes, under the Dalai Lama, no.
ComradeMr 8 months ago
@ComradeMr lol? You're stupid. Dalai Lama is the most democratic leader in world.
MrWggg 7 months ago
@MrWggg He wasn't elected, he was incarnated.
purelego 7 months ago
鸟歌
sheziyu 8 months ago
Freedom for Tibet!
kick out the Chinese oppressors!
Stop communist imperialism!
realisticsocialist 8 months ago 12
@realisticsocialist You do realize that Tibet was a theocracy much like post-revolutionary Iran before the Chinese took over? And you do realize that, under Tibetan law, every Tibetan was the personal property, or 'slave', of the Dalai Lama? And pray tell, I hope you do know that the vast majority of Tibetans were destitute before the 1950s, because the persons of spiritual importance amassed all the wealth and power?
Be realistic here; China has enforced a reverse imperialist agenda.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
the tibetan people apparrantly prefer a theocracy more than communist oppression. the point is they should be allowed to have what they prefer. the ccp imposed itself upon tibet. the people never chose it. china was even more destitute when the commies took over, also tibet was worse off. communism, simply doesnt work for the benefit of the majority. it only works for the people who control it. it serves the masters not the enslaved. the ccp needs to dissolve forever. i hope soon.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
free tibet!!!!!!!!!!!!
israelnothanks 9 months ago
15 people are deaf
Trustnoidiot 9 months ago
西藏永遠是中國的一部分 現在是 以後也是 想獨立 吃X吧!
zz840529 9 months ago
@zz840529 西藏是中国入侵，将有一天被释放
speedy779 9 months ago
Shut up. Tibet is China. CHINA HAS ALREADY LOST OUTER MANCHURIA TO RUSSIA, LOST SOUTHERN TIBET TO INDIA, LOST PART OF ITS TERRITORY TO NORTH KOREA, SOME ISLANDS TO JAPAN, EVEN GIVEN SOME TERRITORY TO CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES. Would United States be that generous? You colonizers have no right to criticize because all you did is killing Native Americans, killing Mexicans and behave like a robber in Hawaii.
keanezheng1 10 months ago
@keanezheng
Prior to the Communist invasion in 1950 Tibet was an independent country, with its own language, its own culture, its own passports, its own legitimate internationally recognized government, its own army, its own separate history and its own distinct traditions. Tibet is not China, anymore than Algeria is France or India is Britain. Tibet has been colonized by communists but will soon regain its freedom!
TheTollundWoman 10 months ago
@TheTollundWoman You should learn history. I admit so-called invasion, but that's far before 1950s. Since Qing Dynasty(18th century), Tibet has been part of China. Anyway, you can condemn communism because sometimes it is really annoying, but splitting the country is intolerable because it's there.
keanezheng1 10 months ago
Comment removed
keanezheng1 10 months ago
@keanezheng1
The Qing dynasty never attempted the destruction of Tibetan culture and society, burned monastaries or forced religious leaders into exile, or starved millions of people to death, or imprisonedthousands of Tibetans simply for speaking their own language and continuing their own culture. The Qing dynasty in fact allowed a large amount of autonomy. whereas the CCP is attempting cultural genocide
TheTollundWoman 10 months ago
@TheTollundWoman And may I remind you that Tibet's history has mostly been violent, not the usual image of a shangri-la you're used to. And infact, these 'monasteries' were more like forts and the amount of monasteries that were destroyed during the course of Tibet's violent history overshadows the amount that were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution.
TheBrolit 5 months ago
@TheBrolit Are you saying that chinese didnt destroy most of Tibets monasteries during the so called "cultural revolution"? PRC is pretty much doing a cultural genocide in tibet
Vamutus 5 months ago
@Vamutus Oh please, it's not genocide if the cultural destruction was universal and equally as deadly to any religious or spiritual settings that were deemed too oppressive of their followers.
Religion is the opiate of the people, and it just so happened that Tibet had a lot of mindless zombies following their god in human reincarnation.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
thats your opinion and the opinion of others who dont believe. you should not impose your lack of belief on the people of tibet who do believe. the point is they should have what they prefer. they should not have a communist gov. or any gov. imposed on them. its your choice to not believe. its obviously not the tibetan peoples' choice., neither is communism. they are not imposing there will on you or anyone. but the commies are imposing themselves on tibet. thats just wrong, unfair, and unjust
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 It's kinda pointless to talk about the Tibetan separatist movement. The majority of its followers aren't even Tibetan born, only a bunch of overprivileged college activists.
My point was not to justify the act of invasion; it's to justify the occupation thereafter.To claim the occupation is unjust is to be hypocritical for any country that has ever embraced expansionism. And in reality, Tibet is not occupied. It's an autonomous province.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
i understand. youre still missing a key point. whether you agree or not with the overpriviledged college activists they are demonstrating there right to express there belief as much as you have the same right. i dont believe its there intention to be hypocritical. they just are passionate about what they believe. tibet is occupied. the ccp imposed there presence. the people there never wanted the ccp. if tibet is autonomous then the ccp shouldnt be there imposing thats a contradiction.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "they are demonstrating there right to express there belief as much as you have the same right"
I'm not trying to stop them. We need more activists to get rid of the apathetic stagnation that is our political landscape. But while they can return home to a prepaid lifestyle supported by First World parents, the standard of living for Tibetans would drop drastically if these kids got their way.
"autonomous"
They are as autonomous as the First Nations of Canada, where I am from.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
i meant they have the right as we all do. as autonomy goes canada is not communist. the ccp claims they allow autonomy in tibet, hong kong, macao and few other regions i cant name. the ccp presence is still felt and restrictive as always. autonomy under the ccp is a contradiction of terms. these so-called kids will not necessarily get there way. ultimately what i believe will happen is the ccp will dissolve through economic collapse. the bubble will burst then will democracy take place.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "as autonomy goes canada is not communist."
Autonomy has nothing to do with communist ideology. I used Canada as an example to show cultural minorities holding *some* autonomy within a country, just like Tibet does within China.
"ccp claims they allow autonomy"
*You* claim the ccp claims. In reality, the ccp *does*. Their only restriction on autonomous regions is to ban separatist movements. Everything, *Everything* else is controlled by local government officials.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
i am older than you and remember the cold war at its peak. the cuban missle crisis for example. i am from a world that believes communism is the problem that is preventing democratic rule taking hold throughout the world. the difference is that communism imposes itself. democracy is encourages so other nations have the right of self determination without oppressive communism or ancient tribal rule that is also imposed and archaic today. communism simply doesnt work for the many only the few
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "the cuban missle crisis"
Only happened because America was afraid Cuba was going to acquire one nuclear device, when they themselves have hundreds, and now, thousands.
"democratic rule"
I'm sorry, but it's naive to believe there are no capitalist dictatorships.
"democracy is encourages so other nations have the right of self determination"
By what degree of self determination? Local governance? Full sovereignty? Vassal state? I can provide many examples to contradict you here.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
just because you are critical of democracy doesnt make democracy wrong or corrupt. any gov. is as good or bad as the people who administer it. ive seen youre site. you are obviously a supporter of communism at least upon appearance. if you are indeed 20 yrs old then you frankly dont know much of what youre saying. yes, cuban missle crisis. the point being what right did the ussr. have to install missles in cuba and point them at the u.s.? none. thats simply arrogance.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "doesnt make democracy wrong or corrupt."
Just because you are critical of Fascism doesn't make Fascists wrong or corrupt. Do you see the inherent failure of your argument?
"if you are indeed 20 yrs old"
Do not patronize my age. I know plenty of child prodigies that could destroy adults such as yourself in both knowledge and wisdom. Age is never a factor in debate. Do not view yourself as the superior because you happened to live longer than me by a marginal degree.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
im not going to keep arguing with you. you are bating me to continue this pointless diatribe. you dont want to understand just argue. i dont. im not patronizing you im asking you to confirm your real age. you are sounding quite childishly arrogant. yes, age is a factor because you cannot possess the same knowledge of the facts through actual experience if you arer so much younger. dont try to belitlle me by covering up you own lack of depth. i know what i know because ive lived it.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "you dont want to understand just argue."
How about you actually RESPOND to my ARGUMENTS and REFERENCES? I have been giving out examples post after post, and yet each time you reply, you always state that I am incorrect simply because you are 'older' and you 'know more than me'. This is pathetic! If you really want to ignore my arguments, at least stop insulting me with your baseless arrogance.
You're a real asshole, you know that? As soon as you unblock me, expect my replies.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
the end of your reply just proved me right. you want to argue. i dont. see my point? im right. i told you why. youre arrogant, and antagonistic you have a lot to learn. youll never learn by trying to teach someone or me who knows more and better. you learn by listening you dont want to listen. its your statements that are based on your own anger, not knowledge. youll learn that someday. its called growing up. you even dare or demand i unblock you. LOL! why? ive heard enough. grow up first.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 Congrats! I'm starting a new section titled, 'favorite quotations' on my channel! Thank you for your endlessly myopic inspiration!
By the way, the entire purpose of you originally attacking my comment on this wall was to incite debate (otherwise known as *argumentation*). When I present to you factual evidence supporting my side of the debate, you deliberately ignore them and instead focus on your supposed age 'superiority'. Nicely played.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
@unifieddynasty thank you.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "what right did the ussr. have to install missles in cuba"
Because Cuba, AS A SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE, **ALLOWED** nuclear missiles to be built on their OWN soil. WHAT RIGHT DOES THE UNITED STATES HAVE TO DICTATE WHAT CAN BE DONE IN CUBA? Was installing the Cuban dictator, Fulgencio Batista, not bad enough for Cuba that America must also threaten nuclear war against them?
Cuba wanted missiles to defend itself from people like you. Go search up the 'Bay of Pigs' invasion.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
you dont get it. i lived it. if the u.s.did nothing about those missles the soviets would think the u.s. weak and easy to manipulate. the u.s. wouldnt tolerate communism forcing there way and threatening the u.s.. what the u.s.has in its arsenal is beside the point. the soviets had as much. but tried to impose themselves too close to the u.s. no, its not naive to say there are no democ. dictatorships. if there were then they're not democracies in the first place. your analogy is wrong.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 " you dont get it. i lived it."
Which precisely makes you extremely biased on this subject material. When you have been indoctrinated your entire life to fear the colour red, what hope do you have of seeing clearly?
"the soviets would think the u.s. weak and easy to manipulate."
You think the USSR would think that? Even while the USA has hundreds more nuclear devices than them? This was not an issue about manipulation - only about America wanting its vassal state back.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago 4
(contd) it was placing missles in cuba that provoked nuclear war. the u.s. dared them to use those missles and gave them an ultimatum. if the u.s. did nothing youd call them wimps. the ussr was daring the u.s and the u.s. called there bluff and the ussr blinked. even kruschchev was sweating. i see more clearly than you because ive been to the edge. before you were born we came an inch away from nuclear war. its only by buliding up and negotiating from strength that you can neutralize a bully
bigblondman1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bigblondman1 "it was placing missles in cuba that provoked nuclear war"
You're a myopic idiot. Even after I've explained in PARAGRAPHS, you still persist. There is nothing more that I can say but to advise you to search up the historical dates. Installment of Batista into power; Cuban Revolution; Operation Mongoose and Bay of Pigs Invasion; Cuban nuclear deal.
If you deny history, there is no hope for you.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "the u.s. wouldnt tolerate communism forcing there way and threatening the u.s."
Are you serious? IT IS BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES ACTIVELY INVADED CUBA THAT CUBA EVEN WANTED MISSILES. COMMUNISM THREATENED THE UNITED STATES? CAPITALISM GAVE CUBA HUNDREDS OF YEARS OF SLAVERY, OPPRESSION, AND DICTATORIAL PUPPET REGIMES! WHICH CAME FIRST, AMERICAN INVASION OF CUBA, OR SOVIET INSTALLATION OF NUCLEAR DEVICES? By god, sir, I feel like I'm arguing with an arrogant preschooler.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
yes serious. what has communism in cuba done? less slavery or more? how lucrative and solvent is cuba now? they rank at the bottom of the list economically. did communism save them at all? puppet regimes? what do you think cuba was under the ussr? by God sir, just how childishly ignorant can you be? if you are only 20 as your site says then you know nothing you misinterpret the facts to argue pointlessly. if you want to learn keep the mouth shut and ears open and learn child. dont argue.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 " less slavery or more?"
Before Communism, Cuba was ruled by a United States appointed dictator. All of Cuba was designated towards growing fruit for American consumption, as well as providing cheap, factory labour without all of the labour laws on mainland USA. Tell me, is this slavery?
Is it slavery that now, Cuba has one of the best healthcare systems in the world, even though America still blockades them? Is it slavery that no Cuban is forced to sell themselves to live?
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 " how lucrative and solvent is cuba now?"
Cuba does not try to be lucrative. It tries to survive while the United States has active military personnel blockading Cuba's borders to halt any foreign trade.
Besides, Cuba has become a thousand times better than when it was under real slavery from American Imperialism.
" if you are only 20"
Once again, age is never a factor in debate. You think too highly of yourself.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
@unifieddynasty I'm sorry, I don't see any convincing reason why the standard of living for ethnic Tibetans would fall in the long term if the CCP were overthrown. It would certainly be better for them than the extinction which is bound to result otherwise, like what imperial China caused to so many Turkic and other nations in what is now China in the past.
TheHaeresiarch 4 months ago
@TheHaeresiarch "standard of living for ethnic Tibetans would fall in the long term if the CCP were overthrown."
All of China's invested assets would be relinquished. They have their ways of making sure this becomes reality, should Tibet have the means to secede. Please tell me what a highly mountainous region, completely lacking in globalized trade and communication, will possibly do to raise its gross domestic and national product? Especially when it only has pre-industrialized means?
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
@unifieddynasty :my friend ,sometimes ..there are more important things to life than our conventional"global trade /GDP" way of life..such as a "GNH"(GROSS NATIONAL HAPPINESS eg:BHUTAN)what is the point of having an imaginable "standard of living"when the truth is that mankind is worseoff now in terms of genuine happiness then in the past .we've not only become slaves to a consumerist economy ,but we've also become murderers (environment,enxtinction of animals etc).peace of mind over materialism
GYABOLINGKESAR 3 months ago
@TheBrolit
Tibet's history is no more violent than the history of most nations. China's Communist government has murdered over 45 million people since 1949. Your argument is counterintuitive.
TheTollundWoman 5 months ago
@TheTollundWoman Then I advise you to take some history lessons about Tibet. The amount of people that were 'murdered' were not intended to be 'murdered'. It was a result of bad policy, disease etc.
TheBrolit 5 months ago
that is a very callous statement. "not intended to be murdered," that doesnt make the end results justified. you can relate that bad policy and desease to a communist gov. thats the point. the communists imposed there will on the tibetan people the ccp has much for which to answer. and they will answer indeed, and the result for them will not be pleseant. the commies are to blame for all the misery of asia. communism is a cancer on society that needs to be eradicated once and for all.
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@TheTollundWoman your opinion is also counterintuitive. that doesnt justify the suffering that the communists have caused on there own people and the people of tibet. the commies are to blame for all of the misery of asia that part of the world would have been much better off if the nationalists under chiang kai-shek had won and then eventually transform themselves to a democratic gov like they now have on taiwan. if they would have won, mainland china would be a very large taiwan today. .
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@keanezheng1
Ukraine got its independence from Russia, this was very controversial, but it wasn't "intolerable", the British had to give up Ireland and Inda, China will eventually have to give up control of Tibet. Colonies never remain colonies forever...
TheTollundWoman 10 months ago
@TheTollundWoman You know what, Mongolia got independence from China and they abandoned Mongolians characters and writes Mongolians in Russian alphabets. Inner Mongolia of China still writes Mongolians now. If your logic is right, those multi-ethnic countries would have been in chaos because every race wants independence. There are lots of 'colonies' according to your logic. Texas, Hawaii, Okinawa in Japan, Sikkim in India, etc. You cant just help Tibetans, go help them.
keanezheng1 10 months ago
@keanezheng1
Texas wants independence? Fine. Let them be independent. Good riddance.
TheTollundWoman 10 months ago
@TheTollundWoman Who the hell told you about government is still practicing cultural genocide? You ever come to Tibet, or other part of China? Everybody is friendly to Tibetans.
keanezheng1 10 months ago
@keanezheng1
Re: "everybody si friendly to Tibetans"...right, just like Deng Xiaoping was "friendly" to the protestors at Tiananmen...Communists are great at coming up with euphemisms, unfortunately the world knows the truth now...FREE TIBET AND DOWN WITH COMMUNISM
TheTollundWoman 10 months ago
@keanezheng1
If China "lost part of its territory to North Korea", why is the CCP still funding Kim Jong Il, supplying his regime with fuel, and forcibly deporting refugees from the north? If north korea stole your land, why are they your allies?
TheTollundWoman 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheTollundWoman That is because Mao Zedong is not a wise guy. North Korea is really not an ally to most common Chinese, because the regime is more disgusting than Chinese government. If you want to say allies, I would say Pakistan is a good one.
keanezheng1 10 months ago
@keanezheng1 SDFU!! Why SHOULD WE GIVE OUR COUNTRY TO YOU ?!! It's CALLED TIBET NOT CHINA U MORON. IF IT IS PART OF CHINA WHY IS NOT CALLED CHINA U FAG! TIBET FOR TIBETAN. WE HAVE OUR OWN LANGUAGE AND TRADITION. LEAVE US ALONE U NOOBAFAG.
Nyiterow1 6 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Win a war.
birdman631 6 months ago
@birdman631 We are buddhist. and we renounce any form of violence son.
Nyiterow1 6 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Well talk them to death?
birdman631 6 months ago
@birdman631 we renounce any form of violence AND suffering.
Nyiterow1 6 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Well you're out of luck :/
birdman631 6 months ago
@birdman631 That's what u think -_-
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Well, all power to ya! Down with China?
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 Sure >.>
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Fine <.<
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 NO! i wanna have the last say! >.>
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Fine you get last say
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 Ok i will say something here and u are not allowed to reply. Since u agreed that i get to have the last say.
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Fine
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 I SAID DONT SAY ANYTHING !!! omg =.=
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 FINE I WONT, GOD!
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 OMG!!! U just did!!!!!!!!
TT^TT
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 JUST STFU! I SAID FINE!!!
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 ARE U FCKING STUPID OR JUST RETARD?!! When we agreed on me having the last say, U ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EVEN FCKING REPLY !! FFS U MORONIC BRID BRAIN!!!
NOW DONT REPLY!!
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 OK! FUck man I already agreed you would have last say, FINE!
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 oh god..u are stupid -_-
Nyiterow1 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Sure.
birdman631 5 months ago
@Nyiterow1 Sure.
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 You should not torment the mentally challenged like that
he is so looking forward to getting the last say.
Oh well I think he is going to be getting a knock on the door from the Grammar nazis soon
thebritish25 5 months ago
@thebritish25 Dont think you're getting the last say either.
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 who ever said I wanted the last word ?
thebritish25 5 months ago
@thebritish25 Nope.
birdman631 5 months ago
@birdman631 That doesnt make sence ( :
thebritish25 5 months ago
@keanezheng1 ... What the fuck is wrong with you...
fedelede2 6 months ago
manchuria is a region that should be as free as tibet and other autonomous regions. the sins of the u.s. in its history are very real. but beside the point. the reason for it was economic greed by corporate interests that were supported by republicans. u.s. voters can and do vote them out. china is obviously very different. it still about greed but from a direct gov. source because thats what communism does. it imposes itself on others and controls the economy. voters there cannot stop them
bigblondman1 4 months ago
@bigblondman1 "manchuria"
You've got to be kidding me! Manchurians are no longer an ethnic group. They have been mixed with the Han culture to a point of little distinction due to hundreds of years of empire building and one single dynasty. To even suggest that Manchuria break off from China is like saying Alaska isn't part of America because it was once colonized by Russians. One region of Manchuria, Heilongjiang, contains more Han Chinese than Canadians in Canada! This is a non-example.
unifieddynasty 4 months ago
Very beautiful anthem greetings from Spain
Spanishfutbol2010 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
666mlml 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i‘m a Han Chinese and i love 14th Dalailama :)
达赖喇嘛没说过一句仇恨汉人的话。达赖喇嘛把汉人称为兄弟姐妹。不信可以看他的官方网站。达赖喇嘛主张高度自治而不是独立。汉人请自问如果汉藏统一的代价是国家名称为“大西藏国”，在“汉族自治区”里也是藏人当权，汉人必须学藏语，而藏人不必学汉语，国家对外交往也只用藏语，不用汉语，汉人还想统一吗？想统一，就应该互相尊重，学习彼此的语言文化，而不是不加研究蔑称西藏人民的文化落后。希望有一天可以在国家的旗帜下，汉藏族旗帜一起升起，就像现在香港一样。
666mlml 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show