@DisgorgeKILLusa is a moron. It is the latest in aviation technology. It is second only to the F-22 Raptor in air-superiority, and the only reason for that is that the F-22 is pure overkill and it's insanely expensive. ALSO, it's part of the multinational Joint Strike Fighter Project that includes United States, United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway and Denmark. Next time you want to run your stupid mouth, at least have some idea of what you're talking about.
@FMXPRO199 I was referring about the video. All variants are real but the VTOL of the B variant in this video was "animated". Not even a HARRIER can VTOL that quickly. ("')
yess of course this is animated because this jetplane is still intesting face. but don say stupid stuff like @DreamAboutSpace that it can not hover before the exhaust is not down because if he and a lot of stupid people that respond on this video would have done a bit of research you wold know there are more then 1 exhausts and a lift fan!!! but spartan5454 nice jobs;)
You are correct for the most part. but my understanding is that it could do a vertical take off, but would have to be nearly empty on fuel to do it. Thus requiring it to refuel immediately after take-off. So to say the least a vertical take-off is impractical.
I worked on the design & this is fake. It's called STOVL for a reason, short takeoff vertical landing. The fake job was fairly well done though. As far as I know the plane would never takeoff vertically because being full of fuel & weapons it's very heavy. Weight is a HUGE problem for this plane. Lockheed Martin was beating the crap out Engineers to get ounces out. I'm not kidding.
@turkanator123 it is a real video it is just FUCKING SPED UP AS I HAVE SAID MULTIPLE TIMES SO DO ME A FUCKING FAVOR AND STOP WITH THE LAME SEXUAL SWEARING AND DON'T REPLY SO I DON'T HAVE TO WASTE MORE OF MY LIFE.
lol @ the kids that don't do their research on the F-35B's vertical takeoff capabilities. Read up on it before you start arguing a point that publicly (or at least online-ly) embarrasses you.
Animated, but it looks good. It takes much longer for the transition vertical to horizontal flight, the plane has to build up speed. But it's pretty close.
I thought the STOVL meant it could only land using "hovering" capabilities and take off faster (short) than others. Could someone tell me if I am wrong?
@Kirkzzy STOVL was just a term used for the testing phase they were in. Lockheed started with full take offs and landing until they gradually worked up to VTOL.
Although it wobbles a little bit it was still way too steady and moved exactly, along with the camera being steadyish. but overall it still looked very good
very nice, but its definately animated since the verticle lift fan doors on the front on a real one open up with two doors on the side indtead of one giant flap thingy like that ;0)
3D or unmanned STV rejection fast-talk may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
@turkanator123 MAYBE YOU CANT FUCKING READ DIPSHIT. I SAW THIS FUCKING PLANE IN PERSON AT AN AIRSHOW. AND BY THE WAY HAVE YOU BOTHERED TO LOOK AT THE RELATED VIDEOS OVER THERE------->
@thelegobrain oh my god you fucking dumbass.... you litte fucking cunt..... THE PLANE IS REAL YOU FUCKING WHORE ASSWIPE.... THE VIDEO IS FAKE BUT THE PLANE IS REAL YOU ASSWIPE.... GO FK UR MOM
@kksmitty55 hahaha this is fake....u havent seen a f 35 do this in an airshow befor,it doesnt fly in airshows yet,your talkin about the harrier that one hovers too,
@mohummerd The Harrier Jumpjet is also call VTOL, and the Osprey and both of them take off vertically. VTOL is the technical name for all vertical take off planes
@dogwolf666 put your su-47 specs against the f-22 and youll see they are both equally matched. both are planes i love so im not trying to diss the amazing capabilities of the su- 47.
@dogwolf666 you gotta be kidding me that planes like 10 years old it dosent even do vertical take off and it has a high radar signal f22/f35 dosent that plane sucks
@thelegobrain it's not real it's a very nice animation and state of the art cgi. A real pilot wouldn't bank that early in take off, because he would crash the plane. Also the release of the front wheel is too rapid to be real. Take off and landing are definetly cgi, rest I can't determine.
ITS A SPED UP VIDOE OF THE OLDER VERSION. THERE IS A NEW VERSION. IF YOU WANT TO WATCH THE 4 MINUTE VIDEO OF THE PREPERATIONS FOR TAKE OFF AND THE TAKE OFF GO AHEAD. BUT DONT TELL ME ITS NOT REAL BEFORE YOU LOOK IT UP.
The F-35 is menat to be a multi-role Fighter/Attack aircraft. The F-22 is an Air Superiorety Fighter. There aren't many credible air to air threats in the world today and thats why fewer F-22's are being produced.
If I were the president of the US i'll order the building of more F22s. Take this garbage elsewhere. F22's more agile and faster and yes F22s can be used for bombing missions as well for those of you who dont know. Look up f22 armaments.
i was under the impression that the F-35 couldnt hover after it was going at full speed, i thought it only hovered to take off, anyone able to help with this?
@bigturk74 STOVL means Short Take-Off and Vertical landing. It can do a Vertical Take-Off, though it is called STOVL because not all hovering aircrafts can do a short take off. An F-35b is designed to do shorter regular take offs (like a carrier take off without the use of the catapult per say). A VTOL (vertical take off and landing) would be more like a helicopter.
Well to correct everyone so far, this plane might possibly be scrapped due to budgets and also partner countries possibly pulling out. Due to ITAR arms restrictions the British might be pulling out of this project (sorry Brits doesn't look like a stealth VTOL in your carrier group yet) But in the past many projects of this magnitude have been scrapped, like the Comanche stealth helicopter, a first of its time i might add. It is a shame to see such a genius work go to waist...
Comanche was scrapped cause it took to long. and was for the cold war. the F-35 is going to be made.
I don't know where you got your info but the U.S Sec of Defense has already placed a orders for the F-35. the only thing that got moved was the operation date which was going to be 2011 now it's early 2012.
fact the President of the USA was halted the F-22 to 187 F-22 to be made and is riding with making 1300 F-35's and a newer model F-15 with thrust vectoring.
Animated sure,
Kentavr100 2 months ago
@DisgorgeKILLusa is a moron. It is the latest in aviation technology. It is second only to the F-22 Raptor in air-superiority, and the only reason for that is that the F-22 is pure overkill and it's insanely expensive. ALSO, it's part of the multinational Joint Strike Fighter Project that includes United States, United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway and Denmark. Next time you want to run your stupid mouth, at least have some idea of what you're talking about.
ItsNoha 3 months ago
animated... bad animation...
dadinux 3 months ago
well if it took off vertically it obviously wasnt stovl...
franksyfull 4 months ago
F-35B was animation. F-35A was real... :p
kaylaks 4 months ago
@kaylaks F-35A, B, and C are all real and functioning aircraft.
FMXPRO199 3 months ago
@FMXPRO199 I was referring about the video. All variants are real but the VTOL of the B variant in this video was "animated". Not even a HARRIER can VTOL that quickly. ("')
kaylaks 3 months ago
Oh man....thats kick ass right there. Very awesome work!
6V92TA 5 months ago
fag-35 outdated and ugly americunt silly gay crap
DisgorgeKILLusa 5 months ago
Cool Aircraft !
motmot203 6 months ago
if i get in the norwegian airforce im allowed to fly that!!!!!!!
stiigern 6 months ago
you had me fooled at first
kurthepilot 6 months ago
Great animation! 5/5
remigiusz764 6 months ago
Pretty nice animation ! FIVE STARS ☆☆☆☆☆
airsoftroyal22e 7 months ago
animated, clouds moving to fast
Ryanmac317 7 months ago
Animated for sure ! Like in the movie die hard 4.0
777sable 7 months ago
This reminds me of the Turbokat from the Swat Kats.
The only proper VTOL jet ever to be created....er....animated.
craeyon 7 months ago
animation of course¡¡¡
ronaldvarsald1 7 months ago
Most real looking animation on youtube i think and the plane is NOT in testing Faze it is 100% operational.good work dude
ArcAngle0 7 months ago
yess of course this is animated because this jetplane is still intesting face. but don say stupid stuff like @DreamAboutSpace that it can not hover before the exhaust is not down because if he and a lot of stupid people that respond on this video would have done a bit of research you wold know there are more then 1 exhausts and a lift fan!!! but spartan5454 nice jobs;)
fransykiller17 8 months ago
I cant believe people argue over this video if it is animated or not...?
You can clearly se that the aircraft hovers at 0:37, long befor the engine is pointed down. geez
DreamAboutSpace 8 months ago
Animated
Dermeister009 8 months ago
Comment removed
MegaK4rl 8 months ago
I want it as a gift for Christmas
From Czech Republic.
MegaK4rl 8 months ago
I saw it in fly (not on video!). It is real Lockheed Martn F-35 STOVL.
Paulsr007 8 months ago
@dwilliams80
You are correct for the most part. but my understanding is that it could do a vertical take off, but would have to be nearly empty on fuel to do it. Thus requiring it to refuel immediately after take-off. So to say the least a vertical take-off is impractical.
Misfire2 8 months ago
Animation, cinematics of some mechanical parts are too quick to be real
Lrdchris67 9 months ago
I worked on the design & this is fake. It's called STOVL for a reason, short takeoff vertical landing. The fake job was fairly well done though. As far as I know the plane would never takeoff vertically because being full of fuel & weapons it's very heavy. Weight is a HUGE problem for this plane. Lockheed Martin was beating the crap out Engineers to get ounces out. I'm not kidding.
dwilliams80 9 months ago
This is real. It beat out Boeing.
iltjoa 9 months ago
THE PLANE IS REAL BUT THIS VIDEO IS ANIMATED!
WPUSMA1 10 months ago 13
@turkanator123 it is a real video it is just FUCKING SPED UP AS I HAVE SAID MULTIPLE TIMES SO DO ME A FUCKING FAVOR AND STOP WITH THE LAME SEXUAL SWEARING AND DON'T REPLY SO I DON'T HAVE TO WASTE MORE OF MY LIFE.
thelegobrain 10 months ago
This is out now. Made in Fort Worth, TX.
TheDallassports 10 months ago
lol @ the kids that don't do their research on the F-35B's vertical takeoff capabilities. Read up on it before you start arguing a point that publicly (or at least online-ly) embarrasses you.
cybervegeto 10 months ago
de verdad parece animación computarizada
cartrachito 10 months ago
Animated, but it looks good. It takes much longer for the transition vertical to horizontal flight, the plane has to build up speed. But it's pretty close.
harigui40 11 months ago
@harigui40 NOT ANIMATED
thelegobrain 11 months ago
Animated, but it looks good.
harigui40 11 months ago
I don't see how it's real.
LTFalls 11 months ago
@LTFalls IT IS
thelegobrain 11 months ago
@thelegobrain How?
LTFalls 11 months ago
@thelegobrain Ok. I admit. Some of it IS real.
LTFalls 11 months ago
You need more fluidity in your renderings.
PConvictions 11 months ago
animated
jacobw992 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jacobw992 NOT ANIMATED
thelegobrain 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is this real or not
fatmat444 11 months ago
real
Braindeadferd 1 year ago
real, is usa men!
riccarddoo18 1 year ago
I thought the STOVL meant it could only land using "hovering" capabilities and take off faster (short) than others. Could someone tell me if I am wrong?
Kirkzzy 1 year ago
@Kirkzzy STOVL was just a term used for the testing phase they were in. Lockheed started with full take offs and landing until they gradually worked up to VTOL.
DarkMaroon2 10 months ago
Although it wobbles a little bit it was still way too steady and moved exactly, along with the camera being steadyish. but overall it still looked very good
deathpyre 1 year ago
@deathpyre ITS REAL JUST SPED UP.
thelegobrain 11 months ago
3ds max?
vertigo1090 1 year ago
I think it's animated due to the smooth but sudden-stopping take-off of the wheels. Great vid however.
CLR600 1 year ago
very nice, but its definately animated since the verticle lift fan doors on the front on a real one open up with two doors on the side indtead of one giant flap thingy like that ;0)
Guacamole4sho 1 year ago
@Guacamole4sho You should check some other videos about F-35B becouse there IS DEFINATELY that ''big flap thing''.... B)
BlackGoose2 1 year ago
@BlackGoose2 you are very right! my mistake i was looking at the X-35B, which is like a door with two door flaps, the F-35B is exactly like this! -(=
Guacamole4sho 1 year ago
@Guacamole4sho ITS AN OLDER VERSION.
thelegobrain 11 months ago
Dear Santa...
mastermime67 1 year ago 26
vertical lift can also be achieved by kinetic pulse
SERIIOUS24 1 year ago
absolutely real!!!
thegooseman1 1 year ago
song?
sprig3432 1 year ago
nice video, thanks :D
xtmxady1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3D or unmanned STV rejection fast-talk may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
nice aircraft !
SaberExtra 1 year ago
thanks for posting the garbage.
sdtkk44 1 year ago
animated now doubt , but nice vid
zonavelha 1 year ago
@zonavelha Actually, this plane is real and can do this easily!
FutureMarine1775USA 1 year ago
@FutureMarine1775USA
i agree.
ruiopereira 1 year ago
@zonavelha ITS REAL
thelegobrain 11 months ago
Definitely animated, but animated really well.
skylarscaling 1 year ago
@skylarscaling NOT ANIMATED
thelegobrain 11 months ago
@thelegobrain its fake.... don't bullshit me i can clearly see its fake
turkanator123 11 months ago
@turkanator123 Its not animated you piece of shit its a sped video ive seen this plane in person dont fucking tell me its fake.
thelegobrain 10 months ago
@thelegobrain THE PLSNE IS REAL TWAT LICKER BUT THE VIDEO IS ANIMATED MAYBE IF YOU READ YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND
turkanator123 10 months ago
@turkanator123 MAYBE YOU CANT FUCKING READ DIPSHIT. I SAW THIS FUCKING PLANE IN PERSON AT AN AIRSHOW. AND BY THE WAY HAVE YOU BOTHERED TO LOOK AT THE RELATED VIDEOS OVER THERE------->
ITS A FUCKING REAL PLANE.
STUPID BITCH.
thelegobrain 10 months ago
@thelegobrain oh my god you fucking dumbass.... you litte fucking cunt..... THE PLANE IS REAL YOU FUCKING WHORE ASSWIPE.... THE VIDEO IS FAKE BUT THE PLANE IS REAL YOU ASSWIPE.... GO FK UR MOM
turkanator123 10 months ago
YOU GOT IT!
kksmitty55 1 year ago
animated
kksmitty55 1 year ago
Animated, for sure. Nice work!
ctstgr 1 year ago 30
@ctstgr ITS NOT FUCKING ANIMATED IM TIRED OF POSTING THIS COMMENT.
thelegobrain 11 months ago
cool cg
RomaniaTricolor 1 year ago
Looks like cg.
satoshiakira 1 year ago
Check the plane and carrier... Scale! What is that?! -.-
TheTastyandy 1 year ago
Animated wtf, Can u dont see if it is animated or its real life.. Play Sims then u will se this airplane animated. -.-
TheTastyandy 1 year ago
very real
MrBassboy16 1 year ago
Real
allanforato 1 year ago
keyen bgt dah
pixyB312 1 year ago
Animated.
kuylock 1 year ago
Its obviously animated, if it were real i'd be more interested in the capabilities of the chase plane they used to film it!!
jonnyhock 1 year ago
Comment removed
crakajack99 1 year ago
@crakajack99 Really, do you think?? Im not contesting the fact that the F-35 is a real aircraft, im stating that the footage is obviously CGI.
jonnyhock 1 year ago
Comment removed
crakajack99 1 year ago
@crakajack99 Nope all CG.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@crakajack99 ive an f-35 before hovering in the sky at an airshow. its the real deal
kksmitty55 1 year ago
@kksmitty55 hahaha this is fake....u havent seen a f 35 do this in an airshow befor,it doesnt fly in airshows yet,your talkin about the harrier that one hovers too,
oTECHNETIUMo 1 year ago
@oTECHNETIUMo f35. harrier. whatever. no 1 cares
kksmitty55 1 year ago
@oTECHNETIUMo so DUMB its real dumbass and yes ive seen a harrier
kksmitty55 5 months ago
@ldanley72 my point was that this video is fake because the F-35 cannot take off vertically because it is a STOVL not a VTOL.
mohummerd 1 year ago
@mohummerd i think you'll find that you are wrong. Search under "F35 JSF take off"
jonnyhock 1 year ago
its funny because the STOVL stands for: short take off, vertical landing but the f-35 in this took off vertically.
mohummerd 1 year ago
@mohummerd The Harrier Jumpjet is also call VTOL, and the Osprey and both of them take off vertically. VTOL is the technical name for all vertical take off planes
ldanley72 1 year ago
animiation i saw this exact video titled f-35 sim video
adad2757 1 year ago
animation
California360 1 year ago
animation i can tell
rolandtran10 1 year ago
CG animation of an existing jet. I should know, I do FX for a living.
Modeling and lighting are pretty good, animation is a little wonky.
The doors open differently on the real jet though.
And I only say that at a high budget feature level.
For a student project, this is tits! We have whole divisions for just lighting.
Keep up the good work! ::thumbs up::
SnakeEyes1313 1 year ago
@SnakeEyes1313 it doesnt take a professional to tell that its animated jackass
BigBoss482 1 year ago
its real u noob, its f35
koolook93 1 year ago
FUCKING ANIMATED YOU PIECE OF SHIT
andrewm153351 1 year ago
su 47 rules the skies. destorys both the f22 and f35b
dogwolf666 1 year ago
@dogwolf666 put your su-47 specs against the f-22 and youll see they are both equally matched. both are planes i love so im not trying to diss the amazing capabilities of the su- 47.
thelegobrain 1 year ago
@dogwolf666 you gotta be kidding me that planes like 10 years old it dosent even do vertical take off and it has a high radar signal f22/f35 dosent that plane sucks
ilgopeds4378 1 year ago
no animated f35-b best for marines but have an low speed :D
lunimartiandrei 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The F-35's electronics is so high tech that it is superior than any jet exsisting; youtube.com/watch?v=cPKw3RksCcI
hesap11th 1 year ago
Comment removed
hesap11th 1 year ago
omg that is realistic. the american propaganda machine has finally done it.
fbidawi 1 year ago
@fbidawi its real dumbass look it up this video is just sped up.
thelegobrain 1 year ago
@thelegobrain it's not real it's a very nice animation and state of the art cgi. A real pilot wouldn't bank that early in take off, because he would crash the plane. Also the release of the front wheel is too rapid to be real. Take off and landing are definetly cgi, rest I can't determine.
FlyingdutchmanNL 1 year ago
@FlyingdutchmanNL
ITS A SPED UP VIDOE OF THE OLDER VERSION. THERE IS A NEW VERSION. IF YOU WANT TO WATCH THE 4 MINUTE VIDEO OF THE PREPERATIONS FOR TAKE OFF AND THE TAKE OFF GO AHEAD. BUT DONT TELL ME ITS NOT REAL BEFORE YOU LOOK IT UP.
thelegobrain 1 year ago
@thelegobrain link? and besides it seems to me if he banked even faster that he would for sure crash
FlyingdutchmanNL 1 year ago
@FlyingdutchmanNL i cant post the link do to fucking errors but heres the name you can search. Extreme Fighter Jets - F35B (part1)
thelegobrain 1 year ago
I think an 'evolved' and slightly enlarged X-36, remotely piloted as it is, could replace both the F-22 and F-35 in the near future.
doceigen 1 year ago
The F-35 is menat to be a multi-role Fighter/Attack aircraft. The F-22 is an Air Superiorety Fighter. There aren't many credible air to air threats in the world today and thats why fewer F-22's are being produced.
flyboy4692 1 year ago
animated !!!
XxProximuSxX 1 year ago
animated but well, thumbs up from me
MrMilesmert 1 year ago
Probably an animation, but very nice looking. Transition from STOVL mode to forward flight was a little to quick.
michael19157 1 year ago
If I were the president of the US i'll order the building of more F22s. Take this garbage elsewhere. F22's more agile and faster and yes F22s can be used for bombing missions as well for those of you who dont know. Look up f22 armaments.
F22's bad ass.
RobertsDigital 1 year ago
Very nice Aircraft.
USMCMichaels 1 year ago
Es real joder, hace tiempo que los USMC tienen los F35 de aterrizaje y despegue vertical, no se porque piensas que es fake O_o
MisterTaringa 1 year ago
the scene when its on the ground is real when it hovers then takes off thats the animated scene
Smoozable 1 year ago
Animated! Plus the fan door behind the cockpit does not look like that. LOL
m4ace 1 year ago
@m4ace
there is no fan "flap" behind the f-35
and no vtol planes lift off one wheel at a time...
plus the hanger shouldn't even be that close, or else it would have blown away
legomaniaccraz 1 year ago
@legomaniaccraz and the plane appears bigger than the hanger, if not as big
sonicfan1996 1 year ago
very VERY nice animation, bravo 5/5
FlyingdutchmanNL 1 year ago
Fake. The first plane is an animated F-35, but after, wa can see F-33 !!!!!
TheJerycho 1 year ago
cool, but def animated
chestateegold 1 year ago
what was this your 3d animation thesis for college
TheProjektcc 1 year ago
Same song played while the Thunderbirds were preping for flight and running checks at the DM show this year haha
wslx0195 1 year ago
i was under the impression that the F-35 couldnt hover after it was going at full speed, i thought it only hovered to take off, anyone able to help with this?
bushpigification 1 year ago
@bushpigification it can hover to land too. They did a demonstration in a competition against Boeing's X32
mushroomcloudy 1 year ago
animated, especially at the beginning. It also probably wouldn't take off right next to tent/building.
klunz44 1 year ago
Totally animated.
dworkma 1 year ago
animated, the pilots bonse never moves
LewisYounger16 1 year ago
Animated
gnarlyharley1 1 year ago
Animated: the plane moved slightly unrealistic, but not too much. Nice video though, whoever did this if defenately a pro.
MrJambone1 1 year ago
@MrJambone1 yeah... exacly. Especialy when the plane is going to land. But who made this is a real pro. Nice video and music suits perefectly ;)
BlackGoose2 1 year ago
totally animated, but at :29 its looks amazingly real, but its not
krakerstaker 1 year ago
High Roller - The Crystal Method
fmasellis 1 year ago
very cool video!
What is this background music?
Who performed?
super62 1 year ago
animation.
it would wobble a bit more when going from vertical setting to horizontal
Ruede2000 1 year ago
animated
rrito23 1 year ago
i think i does not matter u s have enough with f22
hecka591aassddeewwqq 1 year ago
animated ... obviously
trixski72 1 year ago
real, es el F-35B,despegue vertical,futuro sustituto del Harrier AV/8
RaIdeN55566 1 year ago
real!!
filtreo 1 year ago
name of the track? any idea? motivated me so much =)
qrthsdt 1 year ago
Animated!
fmasellis 1 year ago
Comment removed
moinmughal 1 year ago
its def animated cuz the jsf can't take off like that. Its called STOVL which means short take off and vertical landing
gman19460 1 year ago
@gman19460 its able to do exactly what you see there in the video
dsalabie 1 year ago
Definitely animated.
NiklasFranGoteborg 1 year ago
the video is animanted but we are actually getting that kind of jet fighter
chokingbeaverproject 1 year ago
animated
seanisagamer 1 year ago
Animated but awesome nonetheless
Macdaddy1003 1 year ago
Is this STOVL or VTOL?
bigturk74 1 year ago
@bigturk74 STOVL means Short Take-Off and Vertical landing. It can do a Vertical Take-Off, though it is called STOVL because not all hovering aircrafts can do a short take off. An F-35b is designed to do shorter regular take offs (like a carrier take off without the use of the catapult per say). A VTOL (vertical take off and landing) would be more like a helicopter.
CELPMusic 1 year ago
@CELPMusic
Thx, that was informative
bigturk74 1 year ago
@dude not a problem at all
F35Project 1 year ago
THATS AWESOME :D
LostTradergy 1 year ago
Animated, but really good.
shadowblade145 1 year ago
Well to correct everyone so far, this plane might possibly be scrapped due to budgets and also partner countries possibly pulling out. Due to ITAR arms restrictions the British might be pulling out of this project (sorry Brits doesn't look like a stealth VTOL in your carrier group yet) But in the past many projects of this magnitude have been scrapped, like the Comanche stealth helicopter, a first of its time i might add. It is a shame to see such a genius work go to waist...
DaTaFiEnD7 1 year ago
Comanche was scrapped cause it took to long. and was for the cold war. the F-35 is going to be made.
I don't know where you got your info but the U.S Sec of Defense has already placed a orders for the F-35. the only thing that got moved was the operation date which was going to be 2011 now it's early 2012.
fact the President of the USA was halted the F-22 to 187 F-22 to be made and is riding with making 1300 F-35's and a newer model F-15 with thrust vectoring.
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
nah its fake but really good though
ilikechinpokomon 1 year ago
animated
WAQAS119 1 year ago
It's animated. The only F-35s created so far have flags of various countries under the cockpit.
Brant0024 1 year ago
The Royal Air Force is getting these too
deamonhunter2015 1 year ago