Yeah, the paper work isn't right. Sorry to say. Unless it's had the engine changed and they put a smaller one in. But if not, it's a 2.3L 4cyl. Ford only made one two 4cyl for the tempo and both are 2.3L and the V6 is a 3.0L. Just look up there history. ;)
The 92 to 94 had an optional 3.0L vulcan V6. Same as in the taurus. Ford had to change the engine a little so it would fit in the tempo. It's actually a better engine for the tempos
haha my buddy had one of these and thought it was fast... 13 sec 40-100 :) love it... if the race is 500k miles i dont see any other car beating it though :D
I have a 1992 Tempo LX with a 3.0L V6. I have a vid of it going from 0-115 MPH but its too big for here. I'm going to try to shoot another one that doesnt include all the driving around so it'll fit. Anyway, glad to see somebody having as much fun with their Tempo as I do!
I might buy a 89 5sp tempo v4 2.3
The1982hondacivic 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Having a '' fast '' tempo'' is like coming out of the closet. People are a ''little shocked'' at first, but in the end you're still gay....
this is the result of red neck technology!!! i'm so proud!!!
denonphyte 9 months ago
my tempo has a electicical fire problem in the alternator
mitteey 1 year ago
Redline 5700RPM??
musubi69 1 year ago
Nul
tofdu79 1 year ago
Okay why? Why?
Seriously? Why make this?
xZZxTakedown 2 years ago
The V6 tempo is fast as shit. Much faster than the tarus.
maccuban8 2 years ago
@maccuban8 I had a 94 with a v6 and 5 spd it was funny to see the look on peoples face when I handed there as to them in a race!
will79601 1 year ago
well, i liked those 20 secs to do from 40 to 110, not bad for a 93 car
mpereztwomx 2 years ago 3
yup, and you've got to add to it, it's a 2.3 litre 4 with a 3-spd auto, it isn't actually bad.
Medjeed86 2 years ago
@mpereztwomx
i dunno, my Australian ford falcon gets from 0-100 in under 9 seconds and shes a 1992!
Paiste402 1 year ago
Tempo's don't have a 1.8L. They have either the 2.3L or 3.0L
giannial1985 2 years ago
this one is it showed on my paper work that it was and thas all the oil that it took
boozer06 2 years ago
Yeah, the paper work isn't right. Sorry to say. Unless it's had the engine changed and they put a smaller one in. But if not, it's a 2.3L 4cyl. Ford only made one two 4cyl for the tempo and both are 2.3L and the V6 is a 3.0L. Just look up there history. ;)
giannial1985 2 years ago 2
giannial is right. The smallest engine is the 2.3L inline 4 pushrod POS engine.
dd8721 2 years ago
i did and your right, my bad
boozer06 2 years ago
@boozer06
lol the 2.3 does have to do with how much oil it holds its the displacement or volume all the cylinders combined hold.
Paiste402 1 year ago
dude thats a monster engine for this little car. 2.3 maybe but not a 3.0.
WetDirtProductions 2 years ago
The 92 to 94 had an optional 3.0L vulcan V6. Same as in the taurus. Ford had to change the engine a little so it would fit in the tempo. It's actually a better engine for the tempos
giannial1985 2 years ago
lol that's all she got eh lol
hughface 2 years ago
what the hell did u see the smoke comin from the steering ??:O anyway got a tempo GL 2.3 4 cyl and didn't have any problem with it
julebritish 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You're a fucking loser
Strogenforcer 2 years ago
is that a 2.3 I4 or a 3.0 v6?
degaik 2 years ago
its a 1.8 4 cyl
boozer06 2 years ago
Mine used to accelerate going uphill. Mental car.
CiaranOD67 3 years ago
aha, that was like riding the bus
MXSLICK 3 years ago
lolol
XlElementXl 2 years ago
my topaz do it in 16 sec 0-100 check it out in my channel
ventureandcivic 3 years ago
haha my buddy had one of these and thought it was fast... 13 sec 40-100 :) love it... if the race is 500k miles i dont see any other car beating it though :D
ficklefackle 3 years ago
This is SO much slower than the V6 versions. But hey, you're probably eating up less gas right?
palebeachbum 3 years ago
ya alot less gas and i had a chip in my car when i did this video
boozer06 3 years ago
My 94 Topaz V6 MTX had better gas mileage than my 92 2.3 MTX
fordcontour 3 years ago
That's slow BUT not as bad as my 4cyl. '89 Lebaron convertible. You should check it out. It's laughably bad.
palebeachbum 3 years ago
lol it's funny to watch the difference in acceleration between the V6 and the 4cyl.
kc550 3 years ago
Hhaha yea i no you have fun with you car going and freeking me out on the boat thinger thanks but its fun lol <3
XxRipLeviDornxX 4 years ago
i hjave so much fun with this dam car... going on quad trails lol ya its fun
boozer06 4 years ago
I have a 1992 Tempo LX with a 3.0L V6. I have a vid of it going from 0-115 MPH but its too big for here. I'm going to try to shoot another one that doesnt include all the driving around so it'll fit. Anyway, glad to see somebody having as much fun with their Tempo as I do!
JohnTaurus 4 years ago
please do, I wanna see it.
kc550 4 years ago
I have a tempo and its awesome haha
tawpgun017 4 years ago