We are all so grateful that Anthony Weiner thinks Twitter should be an open process - now that loser is the right kind of jobless... not in a postion to screw America anymore.
Man, there are so many jokes one could make about Noonan getting served by Weiner, but I won't go there... ;-)
'
Noonan is a moron. You have to focus on the economy huh? Well gee wizz aren't you a smart one? So where were you when the democrats passed the ECONOMIC STIMULUS? Where were you when the democrats saved the auto industry and a million+ jobs? Where were you when... ah, forget it. She was probably watching reruns of Beck's stand up routine on the Fox comedy network.
I'll tell you what I think. I think I never really bought all that crap about the mysterious circumstances related to the blunt force trauma death of a young female staffer in Sxcarborough's office when he was a congressman. But the more I look at that shit-eating grin on Joe's entitled face the more believable the idea he's a murderer becomes.
peggy "just keep on walking" noonan is an intellectually bankrupt, soul-less cheerleader for the worst parts of the conservative and neoconservative establishment.
Weiner's the fucking man. He had me at the Zadroga Bill call out.
@TreachMarkets Well, I think health care is a better place to spent the fucking money than on bomb that you hope not to use or than on broken cars. When you think about it, you got more for your money...
@therrydicule So those are the choices, a wacky unrealistic healthcare scheme or bombs? How about none of the above? It's like the fact that they're stealing from us is a given, so we' re supposed to feel happy that we get a couple choices? Please...
@TreachMarkets Here is the point I try to made: the market is pretty good when there is concurrence, but right now in health care is an oligopoly which is not really good because there is little concurrence&some possible cohesion. However, the population need some health care but like a free market system... Therefor why not having, at least, a form of government health-care (like a parastatal that is the Saudi Oil compagny) steeping in to create concurrence and bringing the price down a bit?
@therrydicule How about fixing the regulation issues so that there's real competition? Why aren't every company's plans available in every state? Forcing us all to buy the same product isn't going to solve anything, it just makes it worse.
@TreachMarkets Well, because you got some state regulation as well.
And, actually, even if there is less profit made by government system there is more wealth done from the government. And, even worst: the health-care system in Slovakia create more wealth than the one in USA, which I would consider as an insult.
"We are in the Great Recession, you have to worry about debt and deficit." Peggy Noonan deep down knows that the recession is not the same thing as the deficit, but is too conservative to acknowledge reality, and wants to twist our economic problems into an excuse to shrink government. Fix the economy, THEN fix the deficit.
Thanks for video/laugh. Noonan is just like the rest of the right wing endlessly parroting lies, distortions, ad infinitim. It never ceases to amaze that in the face of truth they persist in saying up is down, black is white and evern more astounding is that their minions unquestioning follow their leader. Good book if anyone's interested. Salvadore Maddi, The Authoritarian Mind. It explains how Hitler rose to power, based upon how parents raised their kids to never question authority.
Noonan came off like a pompous windbag who had no idea what she was talking about. Let's see one year into his presidency, the great Peggy Noonan can already articulate with all certainty what history was demanding of Obama.....pls.
No, she was trying to say that healthcare wasn't as important as a pure focus on the economy. Healthcare and education comprise parts of our economy, but if you focus on the economy itself, you affect change on those, as well as all other, parts of it.
Her argument is a middling one in terms of strength, but Weiner won because he had a good point -and- a great delivery. His speech at the end is one of the most impressive improvs I've seen of a politician.
@Doodoorump Listen, I like Noonan but that was not a great moment for her. Before Weiner spoke a word she sounded terrible. I know what her point was about focus on the economy, but her claims about the "demands of history" came off incredibly affectedly self important.
I don't think she sounded that bad. She just has a soft voice and she isn't the best public speaker ever. Her content was good enough to me...
A lot of times people judge winners and losers of debates by 'who was the best speaker,' not 'who had the best points.' Their points, to be honest, were pretty close. Weiner's was a little stronger, in terms of content, but not that much.
Weiner needs to learn that there is a difference between productive jobs and unproductive jobs. If all the government needs to do is hire people the crisis would be over tomorrow, just hire 20 million more teachers or policemen or whatever, but those are not productive jobs. When politicians that don't even understand that much, America is lost.
You actually don't seem to understand much. All jobs are 'productive' jobs. The entire point of a job is production. Weiner didn't say anything about productive vs unproductive. If 'productive' employers can hire workers at better prices thanks to lower healthcare coverage costs, then they will, and more 'productive' jobs will be created. So, your weird two-pronged job definition doesn't even having anything to do with this...
@Doodoorump If an employer has to hire a lawyer to make sure his comp. is complying with government regs, that is an unproductive job, the lawyer isn't bringing in any income, he is an expense. On the other hand, if the employer hires a person to run a manufacturing machine to produce more goods to sell at a profit, that is productive.
Do you think that disallowing HC Co's from refusing coverage due to pre-existing conditions will lower costs? Listen to Peter Schiff on this issue, it's easy.
That's pretty dumb. The lawyer produces a service, and that is knowledge of the law. Adequate knowledge of the law saves a company money in the long run.
And the bill doesn't just disallow HoC's from refusing coverage, it also redirects a lot of cash in their direction...
Much like Peter 'I belong to an economic school of crank science' Schiff, you're cherry-picking facts to suit your weird, silly theories.
@Doodoorump The lawyer doesn't produce anything for the company. I guess you think it is economically productive for the government to pass regulations, say, requiring a finance company to report all the transactions of their clients to DHS, and for that company to hire a lawyer to make sure they are complying w those regulations. Why don't you just pass a million more regulations requiring more lawyers and pretty soon we'll all be rich, idiot?
@Doodoorump Don't mistake me for a strict, libertarian type capitalist. I'm not. I have fundamental disagreements with Schiff but he understands a lot. I hope you will consider that not all services are "productive". In econ. terms, just because you get something back from an employee you hire doesn't mean he is a productive employee, in econ. terms. Hire 1 million police and you get safer streets but their efforts will not bring in more capital to their employer. Same with doctors.
If you get back something from an employee you hire, then yes, that employee -is- productive. What you're trying to say in a roundabout way is that the cost of new regulations sometimes outweighs the benefits they bring. And when you can show that the social/econ benefits of this legislation necessarily outweigh the new costs on firms, then you'll have more to say.
@Doodoorump You wont make sound economic judgments until you understand that an employee who doesn't take part in producing the capital to pay for his own wages is not productive. If you hire a doctor, the money you pay him must come from profits you earned from some other enterprise - not true with say, a logger or manufacturing worker.
Non productive workers, like gov employees, are a drag on the economy, thus, we need smaller government.
That's some of the most ridiculous argumentation I've ever heard. A service is a product. You pay a Doctor to tell you what is wrong with you and suggest a treatment plan. Information is a commodity, and it can be bought and sold.
You are thinking in extremely literal terms...and that's dragging down your economic understanding. Good luck in fixing that
@Doodoorump Your first pargrph shows that you still miss the point in spite of it's clarity. It doesn't matter if a service is a product or a commodity. Does the employee generate income out of which you pay his wages?
If you owned a taxi company I guess you would be thrilled to hire more and more mechanics to keep your cars running, lol. No, you would rather hire drivers to bring in an income and have them drive your cars more gently so you would require fewer mechanics.
If the lawyer is saving you money then he's generating income. It's the same reason you hire workers to make wigets, because although you could keep more money for yourself by making all the wigets yourself, you'd actually save time (which = money) by hiring additional workers.
It's not that I'd be thrilled, but if we need another mechanic to save us money then the mechanic adds value because less profit escapes.
No. If the Gov't passes a law and the company doesn't hire a lawyer, they will be paying dozens of fines for various violations. -With- a lawyer they won't be paying those fines. The lawyer saves the firm money. The only way a firm can get by without hiring lawyers is if we have no laws...
and hiring another worker at the machines isn't necessarily productive. It's called marginal utility, you should read about it sometime.
And no one said it's going to lower costs. Combining the new regulation with the influx of new customers into the insurance market, I'd say there will still be a small increase in healthcare premiums...but it will be well worth the social benefit.
We are all so grateful that Anthony Weiner thinks Twitter should be an open process - now that loser is the right kind of jobless... not in a postion to screw America anymore.
goodstarbucks 5 months ago
See, he didn't loose his job over sexting he lost it because he made too much sense
megeles 6 months ago
my nigga Weiner.
gillsgrapes 7 months ago
poor weiner, he was quite the Rep. Until he got roasted. Or should i say--grilled
venttCo 7 months ago
14 PLUS TRILLION NUFF SAID
tinman5680 9 months ago
Man, there are so many jokes one could make about Noonan getting served by Weiner, but I won't go there... ;-)
'
Noonan is a moron. You have to focus on the economy huh? Well gee wizz aren't you a smart one? So where were you when the democrats passed the ECONOMIC STIMULUS? Where were you when the democrats saved the auto industry and a million+ jobs? Where were you when... ah, forget it. She was probably watching reruns of Beck's stand up routine on the Fox comedy network.
BootBazaar 10 months ago
you think noonan's a "classy lady?" wow man.
I'll tell you what I think. I think I never really bought all that crap about the mysterious circumstances related to the blunt force trauma death of a young female staffer in Sxcarborough's office when he was a congressman. But the more I look at that shit-eating grin on Joe's entitled face the more believable the idea he's a murderer becomes.
mitchgunthorpe 11 months ago
peggy "just keep on walking" noonan is an intellectually bankrupt, soul-less cheerleader for the worst parts of the conservative and neoconservative establishment.
Weiner's the fucking man. He had me at the Zadroga Bill call out.
mitchgunthorpe 11 months ago 3
Somebody needs to slap shut that sluts mouth. What an asshole, just like the rest of the GOP.
rickbar123 1 year ago
This is a good match up. Though I disagree with a lot of her ideologies, Noonan is no slouch.
TyroneTasty 1 year ago
@TyroneTasty i agree
NEBTV 1 year ago
@TyroneTasty she's an annoying twit
deceptikan 1 year ago
Weiner is the man and Noonan is a neocon shill and Reagan revisionist who is unable to look anybody straight in the eye.
jdgrab1 1 year ago
Anthony Weiner doesn't get it, we Don't Have the Money!
TreachMarkets 1 year ago
@TreachMarkets Well, I think health care is a better place to spent the fucking money than on bomb that you hope not to use or than on broken cars. When you think about it, you got more for your money...
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule So those are the choices, a wacky unrealistic healthcare scheme or bombs? How about none of the above? It's like the fact that they're stealing from us is a given, so we' re supposed to feel happy that we get a couple choices? Please...
TreachMarkets 1 year ago
@TreachMarkets Here is the point I try to made: the market is pretty good when there is concurrence, but right now in health care is an oligopoly which is not really good because there is little concurrence&some possible cohesion. However, the population need some health care but like a free market system... Therefor why not having, at least, a form of government health-care (like a parastatal that is the Saudi Oil compagny) steeping in to create concurrence and bringing the price down a bit?
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule How about fixing the regulation issues so that there's real competition? Why aren't every company's plans available in every state? Forcing us all to buy the same product isn't going to solve anything, it just makes it worse.
TreachMarkets 1 year ago
@TreachMarkets Well, because you got some state regulation as well.
And, actually, even if there is less profit made by government system there is more wealth done from the government. And, even worst: the health-care system in Slovakia create more wealth than the one in USA, which I would consider as an insult.
therrydicule 1 year ago
Greedy little "small hands" horny toad Weiner sux.
cano21 1 year ago
Peggy Noonan is the most annoying nitwit on the planet. Stop moving your hands around and sit still you freakshow.
bp552001 1 year ago 2
"We are in the Great Recession, you have to worry about debt and deficit." Peggy Noonan deep down knows that the recession is not the same thing as the deficit, but is too conservative to acknowledge reality, and wants to twist our economic problems into an excuse to shrink government. Fix the economy, THEN fix the deficit.
davidumpteen 1 year ago
nice 2 c a ballsy democrat
ItsEricaBeyetch 1 year ago
Go Weiner!!! Now the GOP cares about spending and the middle class???? Thats new to the American people.
DWDave67 1 year ago
Noonan is only good for sucking my Giant Taiwanese Penis.
noformstyle 1 year ago
I heard Noonan likes the salty taste of her own piss.
loonmaniac 1 year ago
peggy noonan is such a condescending bitch!!
llar8888 1 year ago 2
Anthony Weiner kicks Ass, Kicks Republican Ass, no pun intended.
Hey Neb isn't this guy Ballzy? Every time I see him on TV, he is kicking Republican ass, keep doing your thing Anthony! Great vid Neb.
RepublicanINBREEDING 1 year ago 8
@RepublicanINBREEDING Thanks RIB and its good to see you again.
NEBTV 1 year ago
@RepublicanINBREEDING YOU MUST BELONG TO A UNION.OH YEA WEINER HAS A VERY SMALL PENIS
tinman5680 9 months ago
This cunt needs a shot right between the eyes.
deeter131 1 year ago
yay NEB thank you baby!
AlmostAlwaysFabulous 1 year ago
Very nice!
dsbrown3000 1 year ago 3
yeah I'd say Dean sh*t on both of them
TheJamesPope 1 year ago 2
SomeBody Need's to CockSlap, This Ignorant Bitch!
GypsyKing7 1 year ago 2
haha that is the exact expresion i have on my face when i hear these right wing douchebags talk.
vincevince801 1 year ago
Thanks for video/laugh. Noonan is just like the rest of the right wing endlessly parroting lies, distortions, ad infinitim. It never ceases to amaze that in the face of truth they persist in saying up is down, black is white and evern more astounding is that their minions unquestioning follow their leader. Good book if anyone's interested. Salvadore Maddi, The Authoritarian Mind. It explains how Hitler rose to power, based upon how parents raised their kids to never question authority.
onesmartgal 1 year ago
Noonan came off like a pompous windbag who had no idea what she was talking about. Let's see one year into his presidency, the great Peggy Noonan can already articulate with all certainty what history was demanding of Obama.....pls.
roots12 1 year ago
@roots12
No, she was trying to say that healthcare wasn't as important as a pure focus on the economy. Healthcare and education comprise parts of our economy, but if you focus on the economy itself, you affect change on those, as well as all other, parts of it.
Her argument is a middling one in terms of strength, but Weiner won because he had a good point -and- a great delivery. His speech at the end is one of the most impressive improvs I've seen of a politician.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Doodoorump Listen, I like Noonan but that was not a great moment for her. Before Weiner spoke a word she sounded terrible. I know what her point was about focus on the economy, but her claims about the "demands of history" came off incredibly affectedly self important.
roots12 1 year ago
@roots12
I don't think she sounded that bad. She just has a soft voice and she isn't the best public speaker ever. Her content was good enough to me...
A lot of times people judge winners and losers of debates by 'who was the best speaker,' not 'who had the best points.' Their points, to be honest, were pretty close. Weiner's was a little stronger, in terms of content, but not that much.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
That's right! Let's get the damn thing done already!
Thanks for sharing ; )
JTlovesDexter 1 year ago 2
Weiner needs to learn that there is a difference between productive jobs and unproductive jobs. If all the government needs to do is hire people the crisis would be over tomorrow, just hire 20 million more teachers or policemen or whatever, but those are not productive jobs. When politicians that don't even understand that much, America is lost.
Epic878787 1 year ago
@Epic878787
You actually don't seem to understand much. All jobs are 'productive' jobs. The entire point of a job is production. Weiner didn't say anything about productive vs unproductive. If 'productive' employers can hire workers at better prices thanks to lower healthcare coverage costs, then they will, and more 'productive' jobs will be created. So, your weird two-pronged job definition doesn't even having anything to do with this...
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Doodoorump If an employer has to hire a lawyer to make sure his comp. is complying with government regs, that is an unproductive job, the lawyer isn't bringing in any income, he is an expense. On the other hand, if the employer hires a person to run a manufacturing machine to produce more goods to sell at a profit, that is productive.
Do you think that disallowing HC Co's from refusing coverage due to pre-existing conditions will lower costs? Listen to Peter Schiff on this issue, it's easy.
Epic878787 1 year ago
@Epic878787
That's pretty dumb. The lawyer produces a service, and that is knowledge of the law. Adequate knowledge of the law saves a company money in the long run.
And the bill doesn't just disallow HoC's from refusing coverage, it also redirects a lot of cash in their direction...
Much like Peter 'I belong to an economic school of crank science' Schiff, you're cherry-picking facts to suit your weird, silly theories.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Doodoorump The lawyer doesn't produce anything for the company. I guess you think it is economically productive for the government to pass regulations, say, requiring a finance company to report all the transactions of their clients to DHS, and for that company to hire a lawyer to make sure they are complying w those regulations. Why don't you just pass a million more regulations requiring more lawyers and pretty soon we'll all be rich, idiot?
Epic878787 1 year ago
@Epic878787
Yes, he does, you just don't understand the concept of a service, apparently.
The government is always going to exist, and it's always going to be making laws.
And yes, it can be economically productive for the government to pass regulations to address market failures and externalities.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Doodoorump Don't mistake me for a strict, libertarian type capitalist. I'm not. I have fundamental disagreements with Schiff but he understands a lot. I hope you will consider that not all services are "productive". In econ. terms, just because you get something back from an employee you hire doesn't mean he is a productive employee, in econ. terms. Hire 1 million police and you get safer streets but their efforts will not bring in more capital to their employer. Same with doctors.
Epic878787 1 year ago
@Epic878787
If you get back something from an employee you hire, then yes, that employee -is- productive. What you're trying to say in a roundabout way is that the cost of new regulations sometimes outweighs the benefits they bring. And when you can show that the social/econ benefits of this legislation necessarily outweigh the new costs on firms, then you'll have more to say.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Doodoorump You wont make sound economic judgments until you understand that an employee who doesn't take part in producing the capital to pay for his own wages is not productive. If you hire a doctor, the money you pay him must come from profits you earned from some other enterprise - not true with say, a logger or manufacturing worker.
Non productive workers, like gov employees, are a drag on the economy, thus, we need smaller government.
Good luck.
Epic878787 1 year ago
@Epic878787
That's some of the most ridiculous argumentation I've ever heard. A service is a product. You pay a Doctor to tell you what is wrong with you and suggest a treatment plan. Information is a commodity, and it can be bought and sold.
You are thinking in extremely literal terms...and that's dragging down your economic understanding. Good luck in fixing that
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Doodoorump Your first pargrph shows that you still miss the point in spite of it's clarity. It doesn't matter if a service is a product or a commodity. Does the employee generate income out of which you pay his wages?
If you owned a taxi company I guess you would be thrilled to hire more and more mechanics to keep your cars running, lol. No, you would rather hire drivers to bring in an income and have them drive your cars more gently so you would require fewer mechanics.
I'm done with you.
Epic878787 1 year ago
@Epic878787
If the lawyer is saving you money then he's generating income. It's the same reason you hire workers to make wigets, because although you could keep more money for yourself by making all the wigets yourself, you'd actually save time (which = money) by hiring additional workers.
It's not that I'd be thrilled, but if we need another mechanic to save us money then the mechanic adds value because less profit escapes.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Epic878787
No. If the Gov't passes a law and the company doesn't hire a lawyer, they will be paying dozens of fines for various violations. -With- a lawyer they won't be paying those fines. The lawyer saves the firm money. The only way a firm can get by without hiring lawyers is if we have no laws...
and hiring another worker at the machines isn't necessarily productive. It's called marginal utility, you should read about it sometime.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@Epic878787
And no one said it's going to lower costs. Combining the new regulation with the influx of new customers into the insurance market, I'd say there will still be a small increase in healthcare premiums...but it will be well worth the social benefit.
Peter Schiff is a fraud, nuff said.
Doodoorump 1 year ago
@NEB
This is what I'm talking about! Thanks for the video, my friend.
whiteliberal1 1 year ago 4
NEB
thats it baby. Awesome job,Very well done. Five stars
venttCo 1 year ago 2
Zappo! STFU Peggy ya old gasbag!
Bieling3 1 year ago 2
Thank you for this NEBTV! Noonan put in her place! Weiner & Dean keep kickin' ASS!
SickBoyZap5 1 year ago 2
LOL Neb, priceless video, 5 stars
FixedNewsChannel 1 year ago 2