GOP Candidates At The Republican Jewish Coalition

[skidmore75]

Are these idiots vying for the spot in Dc or Israels prime ministry .Kissy kissy!

[knightschwartz]

i'm jewish but GOp ass kissing is embarssing.

[dlc208]

This is treason...why are these people so concerned about Israel? Israel is a foreign country and should take care of herself.

[doit420sdf]

We need to formalize and anti-israel lobby.

[doit420sdf]

RJC, AIPAC are traitors as is any group of Americans that would trade the lives of our soldiers for the benefit of Israel.

The world is waking up to the treason that is the Israeli-Lobby.

[TheNova1960]

All of these candidates would put Israel before their own country because they are AIPAC employees and receive campaign money and will never cut foreign aid. The only candidate that is not bought and paid for is RON PAUL!

[qortin]

this is treason

[MrBullfrog9876]

Bachman "only a fool wishes for war, so lets get started!" Israel starts all these conflicts, let them fight for themselves.

[Pissoffyowpunk]

American democracy; what a farce, an exercise in 'who'll kiss and lick the zionists arse better' so to become the 'most powerful' man in the world...Sorry the second actually, since Premier Who of PRC is the First now. Or this is a sign of "superpower-dom"? Yeah right.

[dtorfleming]

What a bunch of clowns.

Or we could ask what actions over the past 50 years has Israel taken to enable peace in the region? Sure, they've slaughter innocent men, women and children in all the neighboring coutries. Sure, they been a military expansionist country exercising thier right to ethnically cleanse the region much like Nazi Germany did. But is that enough?

[coosoorlog]

Ron Paul's not there, because he does not agree.

[ForbesFortune]

I still do not understand how we can demand regime change in another country. I wonder if the U.S. politicians will step down when we ask for a regime change.

[LilWyble225]

I agree that a nuclear Iran isn't favorable, but why are these republicans so eager to start another war? Have we not learned anything from Iraq?

[ForbesFortune]

@LilWyble225 If China, Russia, Pakistan, America, Israel, the U.K. has Nuclear weapons then why can't Iran have them? Iran is no threat to us, only to Israel, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

[Elaiyel]

@ForbesFortune "Iran is no threat to us, only to Israel, Iraq and Saudi Arabia."

That's why Iran can't have nuclear weapons! You answered your own question.

[ForbesFortune]

@Elaiyel I don't believe I did answer my own question. What they do to Israel, Iraq and Saudi Arabia is their business. It's time we start worrying about our own country. And once again who are we or any other country to say Iran can't get nukes? I'd prefer no one had them, but everyone does.

[Elaiyel]

@ForbesFortune It's unfortunate for you that the US State Department disagrees with you. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Israel are very much part of America's larger foreign policy and we have strategic agreements with Saudi Arabia and Israel. We also have a stake in Iraq's future because of all the money and blood we have invested there. So if Iran were to attack any one of them, we would get involved. You have to look at the big picture if you want to understand.

[ForbesFortune]

@Elaiyel It's not unfortunate for just me but for the entire country of America. Neither of those "agreements" or "stakes" are worth an American life or penny. And it's pretty hard to believe that Iran would attack anyone, they will most likely be attacked first. I've been looking at the big picture for years, I have no clue what you've been staring at. And please don't tell me I don't know what's going on, I'm well aware, hence the dissent. What's your excuse?

[Elaiyel]

@ForbesFortune Whether our 'agreements' with other countries are worth American lives is irrelevant because we have sent our military to carry out our foreign policy based upon America's interests ever since there was a USA. So those in charge don't see it the way you do. Saudi Arabia, (where we get most of our oil,) considers a nuclear Iran a threat. Iran has said it would wipe Israel off the map if it got nuclear weapons. But it's true, it wouldn't attack Iraq. You Iranian?

[ForbesFortune]

@Elaiyel It's not irrelevant, no matter how long they've been doing it does not make it right. If Saudi Arabia or Israel see's anyone as a threat they have the right to protect themselves, we do not need to get involved. Iran said it could wipe Israel off the map if Israel were to attack them, and Iran has the right to defend themselves. I'm not Iranian I'm American.

[Elaiyel]

@ForbesFortune You would be correct if the United States was always concerned with doing the right thing or if it made treaties with other nations accordingly. But it isn't and it doesn't. We still want to put missiles along Russia's western borders, claiming that they are a defense against Iran. Like the Russians are fools. Anyway, we are connected to Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Israel by secret contractual agreements to defend them against Iran. I don't see anyway out.

[ForbesFortune]

@Elaiyel We are connected to those countries through secret contractual agreements, none of which were done by Congress. We got into those agreements through secrecy we get out of those agreements secretly, that's how you get out of it. We have plenty of oil here in the U.S. untouched there's no need to be involved in the Middle East's drama for it.

[ragenut2112]

war pigs. nothing new. move along.

[religiousabuse]

first