If you have marriage something beyond a man and a woman than anything goes. The fact that a woman married you is an example of the institution itself beinguseless. Instead of making worthless vids you should get a job instead of leaching off everybody else.
@BabuyKaKiller "If you have marriage something beyond a man and a woman than anything goes." I know you're just a troll but...I'd love to hear your logical reasoning for your statement. You do realize you can say the exact same thing in regard to marriage between a man and a woman and it still sounds the same. That's the sign of a baseless claim. Marriage between consenting adults is absolutely NOT the same as marriage with an animal, child, or toaster. Please, use your brain, it's rusting.
There was a news story on TV. About a lesbian couple that came from Florida to get married in Canada. Then they wanted a divorce and were told they were not legally married.
I was going to mention something along the lines of what johncrwarner did. The question arises that marriage places special considerations to a couple that individuals don't get. Should there be such special considerations? I guess it comes down to asking what marriage is. Is it an agreement between people? Is there something about this agreement that changes how each of the members of the group should be regarded by anyone with respect to their treatment within society? It seems a good question
By the way I am in a same sex marriage so this is a hypothetical. I would argue that the root problem is that the English marriage practice that the USA inherited was that pastors / priests / rabbis etc. do the state's work for them. In most of Europe you have a marriage at the town hall and then if you want a religious service - this is also true for the civil union in the UK. I think the splitting of the task removes the religious from the sphere of government.
If you have marriage something beyond a man and a woman than anything goes. The fact that a woman married you is an example of the institution itself beinguseless. Instead of making worthless vids you should get a job instead of leaching off everybody else.
BabuyKaKiller 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BabuyKaKiller "If you have marriage something beyond a man and a woman than anything goes." I know you're just a troll but...I'd love to hear your logical reasoning for your statement. You do realize you can say the exact same thing in regard to marriage between a man and a woman and it still sounds the same. That's the sign of a baseless claim. Marriage between consenting adults is absolutely NOT the same as marriage with an animal, child, or toaster. Please, use your brain, it's rusting.
ReverendWyrm 1 month ago in playlist More videos from h8red42
how long until this vote takes place?
elind85 1 month ago
@elind85 By the end of feb/first of march.
h8red42 1 month ago
There was a news story on TV. About a lesbian couple that came from Florida to get married in Canada. Then they wanted a divorce and were told they were not legally married.
GodlessManitoban 1 month ago
@GodlessManitoban 0_0 weird.
h8red42 1 month ago
I was going to mention something along the lines of what johncrwarner did. The question arises that marriage places special considerations to a couple that individuals don't get. Should there be such special considerations? I guess it comes down to asking what marriage is. Is it an agreement between people? Is there something about this agreement that changes how each of the members of the group should be regarded by anyone with respect to their treatment within society? It seems a good question
RichardRoy2 1 month ago
@RichardRoy2 Good thoughts,ill try to address them tomorrow(Monday)
h8red42 1 month ago
@h8red42 Thank you. I always find your thinking stimulating. I look forward to it.
RichardRoy2 1 month ago
There could be a case that marriage is not the job of the state and is solely the area of religious or secular organisations.
That does eliminate straight marriage as well and legislation could be passed to declare everyone not married in the eyes of the state.
What do you think of that?
johncrwarner 1 month ago
@johncrwarner Good thoughts,I will think about them along with Richards above,put up a vid on Monday(tomorrow)
h8red42 1 month ago
@h8red42
By the way I am in a same sex marriage so this is a hypothetical. I would argue that the root problem is that the English marriage practice that the USA inherited was that pastors / priests / rabbis etc. do the state's work for them. In most of Europe you have a marriage at the town hall and then if you want a religious service - this is also true for the civil union in the UK. I think the splitting of the task removes the religious from the sphere of government.
johncrwarner 1 month ago