@Autumn6 i truly believe anyone who follows an organized religion is a moron. its all filled logical and historical fallacies and completely disproves it self. yes i am generalizing all organized reliigions but its true.
No, he's saying that the belief in weird fairytales and superstition that religious people have is stupid. Difference.
I suppose you think that telling us that we're devil worshipping heathens who deserve to burn in hellfire for all eternity is perfectly respectable, eh? Before you go around preaching tolerance and respect of religious people, remember that we are equally deserving of tolerance and respect as well- things that the majority of religious people have NEVER shown us.
Thunderf00t, you're being very oblivious. In your eyes, only faith in a supreme being is stupid. Isn't it equally stupid to take god's non-existence on faith, as you're doing?
@loqutor you should read a little bit about logic and you would answer your own question. which is stupid? believing that there is a bigfoot or that there is no bigfoot? it doesnt take faith to disbelieve something that there is no evidence for, only reason
Thunderfoot takes God's non-existence on faith to the same degree that you take Santa's non-existence on faith.
Not believing in something on the basis of there being no evidence for it is not stupid. It's rational. You do it all the time, when it comes to bigfoot, Allah, Santa, He-Man, Krishna, Zeus, Batman, Thor, Zeus, etc.
We just include the talking donkey in Numbers 22 among the things we don't believe in
@loqutor No, buttercup, "I don't believe you" is never an article of faith. Fuck off with your superstition and your completely empty non-arguments. You are a pushy salesman working for free, and we aren't buying what your corporations are selling.
Faith, by definition, is the BELIEF in something without evidence. Faith necessarily means belief. You can't have faith in something that you don't believe in therefore, belief in the non-existence of something is NOT faith. Saying that not believing in a god is faith is like saying that not reading books is a hobby.
Thunderf00t, you BASTARD. You go on this fantastic adventure across America, meet all those amazing people, while I'm stuck in West Sussex feeling like a travel virgin.
@sillygames And yet some of the greatest minds in history had a deep and abiding faith in God. But of course, we all know the gamer geek neckbeard Dawkins fanbois on YouTube are smarter than all of them, right?
Maybe you and Thunderf00t should look up what faith actually IS. Here's a clue: It's not "believing something without evidence."
@sillygames So someone was *forcing* them to believe in God? *All* of them!?! I never know what new surprises the atheists' bizarro readings of history have in store for me!
I know what definition of faith you're talking about… the bogus one invented by doctrinaire atheists.
Everything Thunderf00t says is token regurgitated, and tiresome. But hey, be sure to include an absolutely *token* implication that you somehow have the intellectual upper hand over me– this is requisite for atheists!
@stallion4life Apparently your history education is as lacking as your ability to use a dictionary. Religion has oppressed science throughout history and only a SUCKER like yourself would drink the Kool Aid without learning what's in it. Stop being ignorant and get back to me.
@sillygames Err… what does this have to do with the fact that the greatest minds in history believed in God, or with your bizarre claim that they were *forced* to do so?
Anyway, I don't think "Religion has oppressed science throughout history" is at all accurate, although I am well aware that the conflict thesis is an article of faith for new atheists.
@stallion4life Wait... are you still defending superstition? Lol?
Honestly man, you're completely talking out of your ass. You're missing information.Scientists had to be religious in the past or else they had no career and might be excommunicated. If you deny that, you're an idiot.
I can't help you if you refuse to learn history, especially of science. That's your fault and the fault of your caretakers. Not mine.
@stallion4life You alluded to something interesting and didn't follow up on it. If faith isn't "believing something without evidence" what is your definition? I looked it up in several different dictionaries, and as far a religion goes, that's exactly what it is.
@ChipArgyle Well since my argument is so token and regurgitated, I'm surprised you couldn't anticipate it.
Faith is trust, and as such you can only have faith in a personal entity. "Faith in God" means trust in God, not faith in the fact of God's existence, which is assumed. Only atheists define faith as "belief without evidence".
@stallion4life I never said anything about your argument being token and regurgitated. That must have been someone else. I just wanted to know what your take on faith was.
I understand now. You're using it like you'd say to someone, "I have faith in you that you will do well on your exam because you studied and know your material." You're separating it entirely from belief.
@ChipArgyle No, it is not entirely separated from belief. If a person has faith in their wife not to cheat on them, they *believe* that their wife will cheat on them, right?
The atheist misapprehension of "faith in God" is nonsensical… how can you trust someone to exist when, if they don't exist, there's no one to trust? When Christians say we have faith in God, we're not talking about belief in the mere fact of God's existence, we're talking about something much more personal and powerful.
@stallion4life Actually if I have faith in my wife not to cheat, then I also believe she won't cheat. I don't think faith and belief would cancel each other out as you postulated.
What the hell was Ray Comfort trying to get at when he asked Thunderf00t that seemingly nonsensical question? I agree with the latter's answer: I would have said "no" as well. I'm just curious what the purpose of this question was.
@TheEternalCrusader there is NO purpose to anything that comes out of Ray Comforts mouth... the fact that we as intelligent humans actually waste time with people ike this is starting to make me thing we are "the new stupid"
Why would you even give WBCult facetime here? Or even the mention? They're a laughing stock meant to be pitied and mocked like lepers. No better than the Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate or The People's Temple. They're less. They didn't have the balls to match up their outfits and drink poisoned Kool-Aid while popping Phenobarbitrol under fire and burning to a fucking crisp....I'm went away...I'm back now. Fuck the WBCult.
Nice RC plane. Put a cam on a helicopter RC and hang around high rises.
You need to drop by CFI in indianapolis. Its the only one of its kind in the nation with many weekly events, its own building and a fast growing community of people who thought they were alone as non-believers and starving for community in the middle of the bible belt where they don't have to defend their lack of belief and instead can discuss logical ideas. We're lucky to have such a center because rent is so low and viewed as a model by the CFI headquarters
Completely irrelevant to this video, but the parked spacecraft in Men In Black were part of the worlds fair in Queens, New York, not the space needle in Seattle
@Lollocide Not really. As I initially stated some consensus mean more than others. The examples you give are not even consensuses but even if they were they would be the consensuses that mean less than others.
@LiberalsUtopian "Atheists hate god because they hate morality."
if you think morality comes from an imaginary guy in the sky or some book written by goat herders who kept slaves you have no idea what being moral really means.
consider that in this day and age anybody with a brain in their head considers most of what the bible condones as being grossly immoral, from that you can glean that we clearly don't get our sense of right and wrong from that filthy fucking book.
@LiberalsUtopian "Atheism is when someone says god does not exist."
bullshit. atheism is the rejection of fantastic claims made by theists, it's not a positive assertion that a deity doesn't exist. it doesn't matter how many time you repeat what you said, it won't make it any less false.
"Everyone knows god exists."
claiming to KNOW something which requires faith instead of evidence is the height of human arrogance.
you might as well be saying "well the trees exist therefore god exists". you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and you're blinded by your own arrogant delusions.
@LiberalsUtopian i would never say that atheism is a rejection of claims being made by something which atheists haven't been convinced of existing, i make bloody sure of that.
"atheism is a rejection of fantastic claims made by "god" botherers."
i know this is what i said because A) i said it and B) i actually went and checked, i said it 2 weeks ago for anybody who's interested in going to look for proof.
you decided to misquote me and remove the word "botherers". you tried to change what i said by leaving out a key word.
"god botherers" is a pejorative for religious people. religious people believe "god" exists and they "bother" "him" through relentlessly talking to the fucking wall/sky/big black box.
@Rabsputin That reply is a total nonstarter. Even I can’t do anything with it. You are too superficial to understand the deep truths I am trying to convey to you.
just because you either A) don't agree with or B) don't understand or C) both, any of what i'm saying doesn't mean what i've said can be shot down with a bullshit non-specific statement like that. everything i've said holds water, unlike...
"I have produced several sound arguments"
this statement.
you've produced exactly fuck all and it's been shot down at every opportunity.
@Rabsputin Here is what your argument looks like to a rational person. ‘What does blue look like. Prove blue exists.’ I could explain the process but then you will object. ‘I only see a matrial brain state I don’t see this aspect of blue.’ Then I will explain that 98% of people for all time can see blue. Then you will go on about fsm.
@Rabsputin You see even if I could define blue for you it would be too long of a definition for you too understand how it makes blue. The human brain wouldn't have enough active memory. How many neurons would you have to remember at the same time to understand the quality of blue? 100k? a million? 100 million? Theres not enough memory.
@Rabsputin You can also look at the real physical material objects that typical atheist materialists put all of their faith in it. Atheists state, 'Everything that exists is composed of a real material thing; however, we do not have access to this actual physical material thing and we never will - and there is nothing anyone will ever be able to do about it.'
Indeed, as I have demonstrated atheist materialists tend to have the highest magnitude of faith when compared to other religions..
@LiberalsUtopian You're dead wrong. There's a MASSIVE difference between "faith" and a "reasonable expectation based on experience and evidence". Do I have "faith" that when I press the gas pedal of my car, that it will go? No. Not at all. "Faith" is belief WITHOUT evidence or, more often, in SPITE of evidence.
@06mustangCE what are you talking about? It takes a leap offaith to say that you are not a brain in a lab being stimulted by electrodes.. Clearly you are wrong and a superficial thinker.
@06mustangCE Actually no, that would be your position. My position is that we can know things without perfect evidence. If yu think I amarguing for solipsism then you must be an idiot. My point was that we can say there are other minds. Your argument is that if any faith is required we should not believe it. You are clearly too stupid to understand the argument (by far).
@06mustangCE You're wrong about me. The only thing I care about is the objective truth. You defend your position with great bias and refuse to take others arguments at face value. Either intentionally or due to lack of education you change every argument into a strawman before you respond.
@LiberalsUtopian If you think that "faith" is applied to everything BUT Solipsism and therefore it is just as reasonable to believe in some kind of god then you need to go back and get a dictionary. "Faith" is "belief without (or in spite of) evidence." Nothing about materialism requires faith. Nothing. If you think it does then your definition of "faith" is useless.
@06mustangCE If you think that "faith" is applied to everything BUT Solipsism”
I would not put it that way. It takes a leap of faith to get beyond “I think therefore I am.” Everyone who is not superficial thinker agrees with this. There are reasons to think other people have minds. Reasons that the typical atheist will label ‘fallacious.’
@06mustangCE “And therefore it is just as reasonable to believe in some god.”
There is reason to think there is an intelligent creator.Just like it is reasonable to assume there are otherminds based on evidence - that would according to most atheists, be “fallacious.” The atheist typically states that a valid consensus is a mere ad pop argument. Stemming from this perspective it is not reasonable to have drunk driving laws. Atheists are too superficial to contextualize an argument.
@06mustangCE look at your responses so far. You have been too stupid to understand any of my arguments so you have responded to them only with non sequiturs. Remember when I reduced your argument to absurdity by showing how it logically entails fundamentalist egoism. You are so stupid you somehow took that as me “trying to argue for SOLIPSISM.” That was such a naïve superficial uneducated response. It shows that you are note even able to understand the arguments I have expounded.
@06mustangCE No, but if Iwas that is still better than the troll you are. If you are not a troll, - As soon as the argument gets at all deep you get lost. Please go to the university 2 years at least before trying to engage in online debate.
@LiberalsUtopian you are so full of shit it's actually frightening.
for a start, we know why we see certain things as being blue, so your argument is a non-starter.
when it comes to materialism, we have access to ALL of the material, the only thing getting in the way is distance which may or may not stop us from reaching it dependant on the speed it's moving away from us in space.
there's no faith in being skeptical. you are a complete fool, either that or you're permanently high on peyote.
@LiberalsUtopian "See this is a perfect example of an atheist raging against god. That is why he is so angry and raging at god and using offensive language."
you can't rage against something that you're not convinced even exists, and i use profanity for 2 very good reasons: 1) i'm from glasgow and around here we love colourful language and 2) pricks like you who seemingly can't even understand english (in an argument in english) are a frustrating nightmare to converse with.
@Chuichupachichi Better than believing that your imaginary God exists it's no better than your opinion of TF or anyone else's point of view. And considering your method of ridicule for that which you disagree with, the reasons for believing the way you do or what you do is completely unappealing. If you are trying to gain support you are doing the opposite of how to get it.
The comparison of the space needle vs ufo to evolution vs creationism is stupendously genius... considering that while easily observing the space needle within this video, I simultaneously observed nearly the entire population of Seattle being killed by the changed, non-rainy environment... while a handful of Discovery Institute individuals survived, due to the development of intelligently designed security systems & front door locks. In addition to having been endowed with magical shower heads
@Chuichupachichi Is that all you people know how to do? Is insult and ridicule? Yet the only thing you will NEVER be able to do is show that your point of view has any sort of VALIDITY.
Hebrews 11,1Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
The substance is what man uses all the days of his life. What is not seen is the former glory before death was accepted by man willingly.
3Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. Man makes things from the the things that appeared by reason of God making them. We cannot make living things, God does.
@kobidobidog "We cannot make living things, God does." Guess you never heard of the scientists who created a harmless version of the ebola virus from none living material.
But besides that, who do you think you're convincing by quoting scripture? Quote some scripture that offers some evidence for the existence of God. Otherwise, all you have are words.
@kobidobidog Faith is the stupid affirmation of the absurd.... to believe in something despite the fact that it either doesn't exist and has no evidence for it's existence, all because some book told you it was written by a God and tells you you're a fool for not believing... That's how all con-artists get your money. God doesn't make ANYTHING, we made God. Hence why there are so many different Gods in the world.
But even then, it seems that God would just be a title for an intelligent lifeform rather than an omnipotent being. Attempting to move from this Idea of God to a religion is almost laughable... Almost every God is aggressive and jealous (in the writtings at least) to those without faith. Do you really think that this being would allow so many religions to exist if his was the only right one?
I like that little bit of satire at the end :) .... excellent trip. I wish i could fly your plane - being able to see through the plane's eyes sounds exhilarating!
5:07 and lo recognizing that he thunderf00t, god over brine shrimp had chosen them the tribe of the halfed plastic bottle, to be his chosen kinde and feast, commit genocide and persecute any other brine shrimp that did not beleive them for they were the chosen people... amen
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
@Mogley52 Looks to me like someone has been cut and pasting from creationist websites. Either you are a troll, or you are a pathetic excuse for a thinking human being. Almost everything you has been said a million times over, even after being shown to be false time and time again. I guess when you dont have a leg to stand on you need to shift the burden of proof and just blindly assert the same nonsense over and over until everyone just gives up with trying to explain why you are wrong.
The begining is so far unkown it does not mean it points to a supernatural answer, thats crap.
Current cosmological theories start with all the energy and matter consentrated in a single point,
so everything came from something. It is only religion that believes everything popped into exsitance from nothing. "in the begining was the void" so that is crap to.
Science forensic or otherwise does not refute atheism, are you mad. Tharts crap
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
This has been flagged as spam show
so whats the relevence with the nazi, bulldozer and jew in our life.
spoddog1 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so whats the relevence with the nazi, bulldozer and jew in our life.
spoddog1 1 day ago
@Autumn6 i truly believe anyone who follows an organized religion is a moron. its all filled logical and historical fallacies and completely disproves it self. yes i am generalizing all organized reliigions but its true.
OnlyF2P 2 days ago
Thunderf00t is basically calling all religious people stupid. Yet Atheists wonder why people hate them....
Autumn6 2 days ago
@Autumn6 No we don't, it's because religious people are stupid. We understand that quite adequately.
smithcas86 1 day ago 3
@smithcas86 Well put
lumpheadthump 1 day ago
@Autumn6
No, he's saying that the belief in weird fairytales and superstition that religious people have is stupid. Difference.
I suppose you think that telling us that we're devil worshipping heathens who deserve to burn in hellfire for all eternity is perfectly respectable, eh? Before you go around preaching tolerance and respect of religious people, remember that we are equally deserving of tolerance and respect as well- things that the majority of religious people have NEVER shown us.
foojuice101 16 hours ago
is there a complete video from the interview with the wbc ?
Philwill92 2 days ago
@2:38 just like a theist 2 make everything about torture or life and death situations. its always gotta be really dramatic.
cruelbusiness1984 3 days ago
Thunderf00t, you're being very oblivious. In your eyes, only faith in a supreme being is stupid. Isn't it equally stupid to take god's non-existence on faith, as you're doing?
loqutor 5 days ago
@loqutor you should read a little bit about logic and you would answer your own question. which is stupid? believing that there is a bigfoot or that there is no bigfoot? it doesnt take faith to disbelieve something that there is no evidence for, only reason
dirkadirkabro 4 days ago
Thunderfoot takes God's non-existence on faith to the same degree that you take Santa's non-existence on faith.
Not believing in something on the basis of there being no evidence for it is not stupid. It's rational. You do it all the time, when it comes to bigfoot, Allah, Santa, He-Man, Krishna, Zeus, Batman, Thor, Zeus, etc.
We just include the talking donkey in Numbers 22 among the things we don't believe in
UseYerEFFINBrain 4 days ago
@UseYerEFFINBrain He-Man is real. He's at my local gay bar. Don't ask why I'm there, either!
anythingnew 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@loqutor No, buttercup, "I don't believe you" is never an article of faith. Fuck off with your superstition and your completely empty non-arguments. You are a pushy salesman working for free, and we aren't buying what your corporations are selling.
sillygames 3 days ago
@loqutor
Faith, by definition, is the BELIEF in something without evidence. Faith necessarily means belief. You can't have faith in something that you don't believe in therefore, belief in the non-existence of something is NOT faith. Saying that not believing in a god is faith is like saying that not reading books is a hobby.
It's a logical fallacy that proves nothing.
foojuice101 16 hours ago
I would have told Ray Braindead Comfort to go fuck himself and stop telling how I'm allowed to answer his fucking ridiculous hypothetical question.
Kailoa36 6 days ago
the right is so fucked
phildirt3 1 week ago
Thunderf00t, you BASTARD. You go on this fantastic adventure across America, meet all those amazing people, while I'm stuck in West Sussex feeling like a travel virgin.
Then you make a video to rub my nose in it.
NevilleRhysBarnes 1 week ago 2
@NevilleRhysBarnes Mmm, I want to fuck a travel virgin
anythingnew 3 days ago
@anythingnew Well then you're a sick pervert, 'cos most of them are very young.
Besides, you don't deflower a travel virgin with sex, but by taking her abroad.
NevilleRhysBarnes 3 days ago
Loved the end. "faith, the new stupid."
HellomynameisN 1 week ago
@Thunderf00t what kind of equipment did you use for this cool night-time-lapse video at 7:03?
Here0s0Johnny 1 week ago
There's some nice footage here, but you had to ruin it with a petty, insipid title.
stallion4life 1 week ago
@stallion4life You're right. Faith isn't the new stupid. It's the oldest stupid in history.
sillygames 1 week ago
@sillygames And yet some of the greatest minds in history had a deep and abiding faith in God. But of course, we all know the gamer geek neckbeard Dawkins fanbois on YouTube are smarter than all of them, right?
Maybe you and Thunderf00t should look up what faith actually IS. Here's a clue: It's not "believing something without evidence."
stallion4life 1 week ago
@stallion4life Right... Like all those minds had much choice.
You know which definition of faith we're talking about.
Your token regurgitated arguments are tiresome, but oh so trollable.
sillygames 1 week ago
@sillygames So someone was *forcing* them to believe in God? *All* of them!?! I never know what new surprises the atheists' bizarro readings of history have in store for me!
I know what definition of faith you're talking about… the bogus one invented by doctrinaire atheists.
Everything Thunderf00t says is token regurgitated, and tiresome. But hey, be sure to include an absolutely *token* implication that you somehow have the intellectual upper hand over me– this is requisite for atheists!
stallion4life 1 week ago
@stallion4life Apparently your history education is as lacking as your ability to use a dictionary. Religion has oppressed science throughout history and only a SUCKER like yourself would drink the Kool Aid without learning what's in it. Stop being ignorant and get back to me.
sillygames 1 week ago
@sillygames Err… what does this have to do with the fact that the greatest minds in history believed in God, or with your bizarre claim that they were *forced* to do so?
Anyway, I don't think "Religion has oppressed science throughout history" is at all accurate, although I am well aware that the conflict thesis is an article of faith for new atheists.
stallion4life 1 week ago
@stallion4life Wait... are you still defending superstition? Lol?
Honestly man, you're completely talking out of your ass. You're missing information.Scientists had to be religious in the past or else they had no career and might be excommunicated. If you deny that, you're an idiot.
I can't help you if you refuse to learn history, especially of science. That's your fault and the fault of your caretakers. Not mine.
sillygames 1 week ago
@stallion4life You alluded to something interesting and didn't follow up on it. If faith isn't "believing something without evidence" what is your definition? I looked it up in several different dictionaries, and as far a religion goes, that's exactly what it is.
ChipArgyle 1 week ago
@ChipArgyle Well since my argument is so token and regurgitated, I'm surprised you couldn't anticipate it.
Faith is trust, and as such you can only have faith in a personal entity. "Faith in God" means trust in God, not faith in the fact of God's existence, which is assumed. Only atheists define faith as "belief without evidence".
stallion4life 1 week ago
@stallion4life I never said anything about your argument being token and regurgitated. That must have been someone else. I just wanted to know what your take on faith was.
I understand now. You're using it like you'd say to someone, "I have faith in you that you will do well on your exam because you studied and know your material." You're separating it entirely from belief.
ChipArgyle 1 week ago
@ChipArgyle No, it is not entirely separated from belief. If a person has faith in their wife not to cheat on them, they *believe* that their wife will cheat on them, right?
The atheist misapprehension of "faith in God" is nonsensical… how can you trust someone to exist when, if they don't exist, there's no one to trust? When Christians say we have faith in God, we're not talking about belief in the mere fact of God's existence, we're talking about something much more personal and powerful.
stallion4life 1 week ago
@stallion4life Actually if I have faith in my wife not to cheat, then I also believe she won't cheat. I don't think faith and belief would cancel each other out as you postulated.
ChipArgyle 1 week ago
@ChipArgyle That's exactly what I said.
stallion4life 1 week ago
ironic moment when an advert for muslim dating pops up:/
ssspe1 1 month ago
Banana man's moral dilemma question is stupid coming from him since he would do anything God asks of him, including sacrificing children or whatever.
Wotanraven 1 month ago
you look a bit like jhon lenon
alexanderhulse 1 month ago
Alex Jones gives me labor pains--and I'm not even pregnant.
Might be gas.
ciuacoatl 1 month ago
@Thunderf00t Whoa what you're in Ithica? I was there for NCUR last year. I'm going to be a little upset if I missed a chance to meet you.
ncw808 1 month ago
Comment removed
00CaptainDan00 1 month ago
What the hell was Ray Comfort trying to get at when he asked Thunderf00t that seemingly nonsensical question? I agree with the latter's answer: I would have said "no" as well. I'm just curious what the purpose of this question was.
TheEternalCrusader 1 month ago
@TheEternalCrusader there is NO purpose to anything that comes out of Ray Comforts mouth... the fact that we as intelligent humans actually waste time with people ike this is starting to make me thing we are "the new stupid"
SuperDelusionist 1 month ago
This is great. Thanks
ctg9905 2 months ago in playlist More videos from Thunderf00t
that plane is so fucking cool though.
KDN888 2 months ago
Why would you even give WBCult facetime here? Or even the mention? They're a laughing stock meant to be pitied and mocked like lepers. No better than the Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate or The People's Temple. They're less. They didn't have the balls to match up their outfits and drink poisoned Kool-Aid while popping Phenobarbitrol under fire and burning to a fucking crisp....I'm went away...I'm back now. Fuck the WBCult.
Nice RC plane. Put a cam on a helicopter RC and hang around high rises.
TheCrimsonification 2 months ago
O.o when did you troll the wbc?
respect
Dreamerx47 2 months ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
I worked at Crater Lake National Park since the summer of 2008 and 2009. It's beautiful there! :)
yahooman2009 2 months ago
I worked at Crater Lake National since the summer of 2008 and 2009. It's beautiful there! :)
yahooman2009 2 months ago
@Jotto: new stupid doesn't mean it's not also old. :) New Stupid==Always Stupid....
thekaxmax 3 months ago
Awesome video!
maarakailet1 3 months ago
You need to drop by CFI in indianapolis. Its the only one of its kind in the nation with many weekly events, its own building and a fast growing community of people who thought they were alone as non-believers and starving for community in the middle of the bible belt where they don't have to defend their lack of belief and instead can discuss logical ideas. We're lucky to have such a center because rent is so low and viewed as a model by the CFI headquarters
anubis2814 3 months ago
@ShaxAMV
Yes, but the first actually just leads to the second. Faith is belief without or in spite of all evidence...which is the root cause of religion.
macgeek2004 3 months ago
Thunderf00t! Couple questions...
Does your model plane give you live feed?
If so, how did you make it and what did it cost?
I've been trying to make one of these forever and it just hasn't worked out.
Thanks!
Unh0lySpectre 3 months ago
Faith isn't stupid, religion is.
ShaxAMV 3 months ago
wow i live in kansas city u were so close to my city
Shane6 3 months ago
you weren't supposed to say what you did in Vegas...you broke the what happens in Vegas rules
kronksworld 3 months ago
I met you at the Walmart in Pleasanton, you were buying parts for your RC plane. Really nice guy.
hotch1776 3 months ago
"Faith, the traditional stupid." - a much better title
tallskinnygeek 3 months ago
Boring ass movie.
Id o agree with the title, but this is a waste of my time.
dariusdareme 3 months ago
dammit, you were at st. helens and seattle and i didn't know about it!? i would have loved to talk about your work...damn...
MobileThinker 3 months ago
Completely irrelevant to this video, but the parked spacecraft in Men In Black were part of the worlds fair in Queens, New York, not the space needle in Seattle
morgothic420 3 months ago
I think you should fly that plane over Area 51. ;)
whanethewhip 3 months ago
@Lollocide Not really. As I initially stated some consensus mean more than others. The examples you give are not even consensuses but even if they were they would be the consensuses that mean less than others.
LiberalsUtopian 4 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian "Because maybe the atheists wants to use these drugs or have unprotected sex with other men and animals."
2 words: catholic priests.
also, drug use is permitted according to your disgusting book.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LiberalsUtopian "Atheists hate god because they hate morality."
if you think morality comes from an imaginary guy in the sky or some book written by goat herders who kept slaves you have no idea what being moral really means.
consider that in this day and age anybody with a brain in their head considers most of what the bible condones as being grossly immoral, from that you can glean that we clearly don't get our sense of right and wrong from that filthy fucking book.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian "“atheism is a rejection of fantastic claims made by "god"”
Yes, atheism is rebellion against god."
this is a prime example of your inability to understand english.
for anyone else reading this comment, the first part quoted was my words, the second part was his response.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
@Rabsputin Nope. Atheism is when someone says god does not exist. Everyone knows god exists. Therefore atheism is rebellion against god.
LiberalsUtopian 4 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian How does everyone know that?
kusalaviro 4 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian "Atheism is when someone says god does not exist."
bullshit. atheism is the rejection of fantastic claims made by theists, it's not a positive assertion that a deity doesn't exist. it doesn't matter how many time you repeat what you said, it won't make it any less false.
"Everyone knows god exists."
claiming to KNOW something which requires faith instead of evidence is the height of human arrogance.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LiberalsUtopian "Therefore atheism is rebellion against god."
you might as well be saying "well the trees exist therefore god exists". you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and you're blinded by your own arrogant delusions.
seek help, and no, not from the church.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian i just noticed the misquote you attributed to me, i hadn't read the full quote when i replied to it below.
not only are you a deluded fool, but you're a dishonest prick into the bargain.
delusion and deception, the 2 prime hallmarks of theism.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
@Rabsputin No thats a real quote from you. 2 messages above this one clearly an exact quote. Looks like you are being dishonest.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian i would never say that atheism is a rejection of claims being made by something which atheists haven't been convinced of existing, i make bloody sure of that.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
@Rabsputin huh? How can people bother somthing that doesn't exist? Freudian slip on your part thats where the truth comes out.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian this is what i said:
"atheism is a rejection of fantastic claims made by "god" botherers."
i know this is what i said because A) i said it and B) i actually went and checked, i said it 2 weeks ago for anybody who's interested in going to look for proof.
you decided to misquote me and remove the word "botherers". you tried to change what i said by leaving out a key word.
you're a dishonest piece of shit.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian delusion and deception, your 2 best friends.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
@Rabsputin because 'god botherers' is a nonsense term.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian you're an idiot.
"god botherers" is a pejorative for religious people. religious people believe "god" exists and they "bother" "him" through relentlessly talking to the fucking wall/sky/big black box.
term defined. you're a god botherer.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
@Rabsputin That reply is a total nonstarter. Even I can’t do anything with it. You are too superficial to understand the deep truths I am trying to convey to you.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian see the first sentence in my last comment aimed at you, read it again.
now read the name of the video. you are an embodiment of that stupidity, congratulations.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
@Rabsputin Ok, but lets be clear. You don't have any arguments and I have produced several sound arguments.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian "You don't have any arguments"
just because you either A) don't agree with or B) don't understand or C) both, any of what i'm saying doesn't mean what i've said can be shot down with a bullshit non-specific statement like that. everything i've said holds water, unlike...
"I have produced several sound arguments"
this statement.
you've produced exactly fuck all and it's been shot down at every opportunity.
if i were you, i wouldn't quit my day job.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
@Rabsputin Here is what your argument looks like to a rational person. ‘What does blue look like. Prove blue exists.’ I could explain the process but then you will object. ‘I only see a matrial brain state I don’t see this aspect of blue.’ Then I will explain that 98% of people for all time can see blue. Then you will go on about fsm.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@Rabsputin You see even if I could define blue for you it would be too long of a definition for you too understand how it makes blue. The human brain wouldn't have enough active memory. How many neurons would you have to remember at the same time to understand the quality of blue? 100k? a million? 100 million? Theres not enough memory.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@Rabsputin You can also look at the real physical material objects that typical atheist materialists put all of their faith in it. Atheists state, 'Everything that exists is composed of a real material thing; however, we do not have access to this actual physical material thing and we never will - and there is nothing anyone will ever be able to do about it.'
Indeed, as I have demonstrated atheist materialists tend to have the highest magnitude of faith when compared to other religions..
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian You're dead wrong. There's a MASSIVE difference between "faith" and a "reasonable expectation based on experience and evidence". Do I have "faith" that when I press the gas pedal of my car, that it will go? No. Not at all. "Faith" is belief WITHOUT evidence or, more often, in SPITE of evidence.
06mustangCE 3 months ago
@06mustangCE what are you talking about? It takes a leap offaith to say that you are not a brain in a lab being stimulted by electrodes.. Clearly you are wrong and a superficial thinker.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian You're trying to argue for SOLIPSISM?!? ...You're either a Poe or a moron.
06mustangCE 3 months ago
@06mustangCE Actually no, that would be your position. My position is that we can know things without perfect evidence. If yu think I amarguing for solipsism then you must be an idiot. My point was that we can say there are other minds. Your argument is that if any faith is required we should not believe it. You are clearly too stupid to understand the argument (by far).
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian You are clearly a troll and are not interested in an honest discussion, much less care about the truth. Fuck you.
06mustangCE 3 months ago
@06mustangCE You're wrong about me. The only thing I care about is the objective truth. You defend your position with great bias and refuse to take others arguments at face value. Either intentionally or due to lack of education you change every argument into a strawman before you respond.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian If you think that "faith" is applied to everything BUT Solipsism and therefore it is just as reasonable to believe in some kind of god then you need to go back and get a dictionary. "Faith" is "belief without (or in spite of) evidence." Nothing about materialism requires faith. Nothing. If you think it does then your definition of "faith" is useless.
06mustangCE 3 months ago
@06mustangCE If you think that "faith" is applied to everything BUT Solipsism”
I would not put it that way. It takes a leap of faith to get beyond “I think therefore I am.” Everyone who is not superficial thinker agrees with this. There are reasons to think other people have minds. Reasons that the typical atheist will label ‘fallacious.’
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@06mustangCE “And therefore it is just as reasonable to believe in some god.”
There is reason to think there is an intelligent creator.Just like it is reasonable to assume there are otherminds based on evidence - that would according to most atheists, be “fallacious.” The atheist typically states that a valid consensus is a mere ad pop argument. Stemming from this perspective it is not reasonable to have drunk driving laws. Atheists are too superficial to contextualize an argument.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@06mustangCE look at your responses so far. You have been too stupid to understand any of my arguments so you have responded to them only with non sequiturs. Remember when I reduced your argument to absurdity by showing how it logically entails fundamentalist egoism. You are so stupid you somehow took that as me “trying to argue for SOLIPSISM.” That was such a naïve superficial uneducated response. It shows that you are note even able to understand the arguments I have expounded.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian Okay, now I know you're DEFINITELY a Poe. Nice try.
06mustangCE 3 months ago
@06mustangCE No, but if Iwas that is still better than the troll you are. If you are not a troll, - As soon as the argument gets at all deep you get lost. Please go to the university 2 years at least before trying to engage in online debate.
LiberalsUtopian 3 months ago
@LiberalsUtopian you are so full of shit it's actually frightening.
for a start, we know why we see certain things as being blue, so your argument is a non-starter.
when it comes to materialism, we have access to ALL of the material, the only thing getting in the way is distance which may or may not stop us from reaching it dependant on the speed it's moving away from us in space.
there's no faith in being skeptical. you are a complete fool, either that or you're permanently high on peyote.
Rabsputin 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LiberalsUtopian "See this is a perfect example of an atheist raging against god. That is why he is so angry and raging at god and using offensive language."
you can't rage against something that you're not convinced even exists, and i use profanity for 2 very good reasons: 1) i'm from glasgow and around here we love colourful language and 2) pricks like you who seemingly can't even understand english (in an argument in english) are a frustrating nightmare to converse with.
Rabsputin 4 months ago
Faith may be one of the oldest stupids around, but it's always finding a new way to be dumb.
patchesdf 4 months ago
I'm surprised those Westboro freaks did not kill you after you said that about Jesus.
agoule01 4 months ago
well at least in the clip Comfort did not pull out the banana on you lol
philosophicalreason 4 months ago
Ufology taught in schools. LMAO!!
scottclements78 4 months ago
wait a minute, I think t-foot has seen more of the US than I have!
nukepwetty 4 months ago
When Ulysses left Ithaca he was away for more than three months.
darebinroad 4 months ago
Thunderf00t seems to have made a mistake. Faith is clearly one of the older stupids around.
Jotto999 4 months ago 59
@Jotto999 Thank you person without original ideas for posting the top comment from 1 week again...
burninmunkeys 4 months ago
@burninmunkeys Why thank you!! You're just too kind! Oh, oh thank you very much! It was nothing. Hold your applause folks...
Jotto999 4 months ago
@Jotto999 no its because faith was once socially acceptable.
tootoot123 3 months ago
@tootoot123 social acceptance doesnt make a claim true, nor smart.
so suck it xDD
OmfgItsHenu 3 months ago
@Jotto999 yes.. but only TODAY are we starting to realize that these people can and will be considered "the new stupid"!!
SuperDelusionist 1 month ago
Your life is amazing and exciting, I wish I can do all this stuff some day.
metabog 4 months ago
5:11 La la la la la la had a run in with a mountain lion? o_O
icanhearthings 4 months ago
Whso the guy from 3:55 i forgot who he was
Imnon00b5 4 months ago
I wouldn't wear all that jazz on near my brain... but then again I'm superstitious against magnetic fields near my head.
turcca 4 months ago
Why would you need a permit to go up a mountain?
fnuttskallen 4 months ago
@fnuttskallen what in a free country like the USA
bicnarok 4 months ago
Thank god we got a new stupid, the old one was getting a little too smart.
kristofor12345 4 months ago
You got to see a Mountain Lion! Fuck I've been backpacking more time than I can count and I've never seen one...
gekapat 4 months ago
With that crazy headset on, you remind me of a young Doc from "Back to the Future." Just practice saying, "Great Scott!" and "1.21 gigawatts!"
ceanderson79 4 months ago
Were I the only one that laughed when heard the phrase "Communist Corporations" , talk about propaganda
tekhiun 4 months ago
I lol at religious morons
TonyEvans96 4 months ago
Faith isn't the new stupid, it's the oldest stupid known to man.
Munnchbunnch 4 months ago 47
Absolutely Brilliant... like an eccentric homosexual's circularly diamond studded, spectacularly sparkling, spicy sphincter. Definitely a considerably advanced improvement from a brazenly boot-beaten, blisteringly branded, baboon butt
Chuichupachichi 4 months ago
@Chuichupachichi Better than believing that your imaginary God exists it's no better than your opinion of TF or anyone else's point of view. And considering your method of ridicule for that which you disagree with, the reasons for believing the way you do or what you do is completely unappealing. If you are trying to gain support you are doing the opposite of how to get it.
artblack01 4 months ago
The comparison of the space needle vs ufo to evolution vs creationism is stupendously genius... considering that while easily observing the space needle within this video, I simultaneously observed nearly the entire population of Seattle being killed by the changed, non-rainy environment... while a handful of Discovery Institute individuals survived, due to the development of intelligently designed security systems & front door locks. In addition to having been endowed with magical shower heads
Chuichupachichi 4 months ago
@Chuichupachichi What a Myopic egocentric point of view you have.
artblack01 4 months ago
Inadequate Analogical Reasoning, the same ol' ape's stupor! (part1)
Chuichupachichi 4 months ago
@Chuichupachichi Is that all you people know how to do? Is insult and ridicule? Yet the only thing you will NEVER be able to do is show that your point of view has any sort of VALIDITY.
artblack01 4 months ago
Hebrews 11,1Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
The substance is what man uses all the days of his life. What is not seen is the former glory before death was accepted by man willingly.
3Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. Man makes things from the the things that appeared by reason of God making them. We cannot make living things, God does.
kobidobidog 4 months ago
@kobidobidog "We cannot make living things, God does." Guess you never heard of the scientists who created a harmless version of the ebola virus from none living material.
But besides that, who do you think you're convincing by quoting scripture? Quote some scripture that offers some evidence for the existence of God. Otherwise, all you have are words.
blackkakari 4 months ago
@kobidobidog Faith is the stupid affirmation of the absurd.... to believe in something despite the fact that it either doesn't exist and has no evidence for it's existence, all because some book told you it was written by a God and tells you you're a fool for not believing... That's how all con-artists get your money. God doesn't make ANYTHING, we made God. Hence why there are so many different Gods in the world.
artblack01 4 months ago
Comment removed
kobidobidog 4 months ago
And yes i had the brine shrimp that they sold me as sea monkeys, I was like ten years old. Retarded fucking asshole, i am : ) LOL
krapptacular 4 months ago
You came to Oregon and I didn't meet YOU!?!?!?!?! Damnit!
Sokkiekat 4 months ago
Wish I would've known ahead of time that you'd be rolling through Topeka. It would've been an honor to have met you
ggtygoo 4 months ago
You talked with the westboro baptists about the bibles and gays? Why? It's like trying to teach a spider how to make ice cream...
fablan6 4 months ago
One problem I have with hypotheticals, is in the situation it is presented as only two options..
1. Have him shoot you.
2. live and kill some jews..
Which in moral hypothetical situations may be good..
However, in the actual circumstance, depending on the distance of the german, Iwould be tempted to at least try to out power him..
grab the hand that has the gun with one hand, move your head to one side, and punch him with the other hand..
You might die, but at least you died fighting..
thefakeyeti 4 months ago
But even then, it seems that God would just be a title for an intelligent lifeform rather than an omnipotent being. Attempting to move from this Idea of God to a religion is almost laughable... Almost every God is aggressive and jealous (in the writtings at least) to those without faith. Do you really think that this being would allow so many religions to exist if his was the only right one?
kamehapa 4 months ago
dude you are a god! (just joking)!
MrGOTAMA420 4 months ago
My instinct for self preservation would compel me berry the jews in the hole, alive or not.
selsuru 4 months ago
I like that little bit of satire at the end :) .... excellent trip. I wish i could fly your plane - being able to see through the plane's eyes sounds exhilarating!
deviouscola 4 months ago
Actually, faith is the OLD stupid!
politicoochie09 4 months ago 3
"Communist corporations"
My mind fukken explodan
Sottef 4 months ago
so, like, you're more than 'friends' with Ashleigh right? good man TF, good man!
Sandyfaceroll 4 months ago 12
You could never watch a supernova live ;-) In fact, when you really think about it, *anything* you see already occurred.
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint I'm pretty sure he already knows that :p
deviouscola 4 months ago
I loved you in It Eat!!!
Have you been making new parody music?
superfisto 4 months ago
this was NOT IN MY SUB BOX!!!
TheRumpletiltskin 4 months ago
That looks like a epic trip
Benable7 4 months ago
"no just say no and die?" wtf?? why ask the question if your not gonna exept the answer? -.-
frikodian 4 months ago
@frikodian
* i meant accept (lol)
frikodian 4 months ago
Awww he drove right by my town in Oregon and I missed him :'(
ky1esty1e 4 months ago
5:07 and lo recognizing that he thunderf00t, god over brine shrimp had chosen them the tribe of the halfed plastic bottle, to be his chosen kinde and feast, commit genocide and persecute any other brine shrimp that did not beleive them for they were the chosen people... amen
fucktardickis 4 months ago
The lord is not my commander Shepard.
elenpop2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 hi please pm me id like to have a chat about these issues. creation=right but creationist are morons ill explain why thanks.
MegaGangstaparadise 4 months ago
@Mogley52 Looks to me like someone has been cut and pasting from creationist websites. Either you are a troll, or you are a pathetic excuse for a thinking human being. Almost everything you has been said a million times over, even after being shown to be false time and time again. I guess when you dont have a leg to stand on you need to shift the burden of proof and just blindly assert the same nonsense over and over until everyone just gives up with trying to explain why you are wrong.
ShroomFuu86 4 months ago
@Mogley52
The begining is so far unkown it does not mean it points to a supernatural answer, thats crap.
Current cosmological theories start with all the energy and matter consentrated in a single point,
so everything came from something. It is only religion that believes everything popped into exsitance from nothing. "in the begining was the void" so that is crap to.
Science forensic or otherwise does not refute atheism, are you mad. Tharts crap
Well thats a hatrick 3 for 3
VideoAudioDisco09 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 "" That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing ""
What science says that something came from nothing ??
"" science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ""
No it doesnt. Why would you think it does ?
podoau 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 "" he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator ""
This is incorrect.
Eienstein belived the universe was created, and continued to evolve, under the testable laws of nature. To him, that was his version of a god.
podoau 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago