$5 MILLION REWARD FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE ARREST AND CONVICTION OF CORRUPT MAYOR ROBERT E WALKUP FOR HIS ALLEGED ROLE IN THE CONSPIRACY IN THE KIDNAPPING AND MURDER OF SUKI ON 1/5/2011 IN TUCSON AZ.
No, I'm not clairvoyant, just stating the obvious, and now confirmed because you didn't deny it, you just tried to use a snarky comment to try and defect from it.
@BringIt2TheMax So, because of your lack of pointing out precisely what you meant, and me commenting about it, you got from that, that I think "liberal politicians are elected for life and that I think people should get government benefits for life..."
All because your lack of clarity. Interesting. Paranoid much?
No actually I got it from this "since you have made such a ridiculously bad error in the first 5 seconds of your video it is impossible to take anything you say seriously afterwards." Only someone that would make the leap from what you believed (incorrectly) to be a single error to attack the entire video would also make the error of believing what I stated. And still you have yet to deny any of it...
No wonder you'll lost. She was elected in 2006, so since you have made such a ridiculously bad error in the first 5 seconds of your video it is impossible to take anything you say seriously afterwards.
And then she was elected again in 2008 along with President Obama (the time frame that this video deals with), I know may people like yourself probably believe that liberal politicians are elected for life (like you think people should get government benefits for life) but in the House of Representatives they are elected every two years...
Read your constitution Article 1, Section 2, Clause 1 lays it out...
Facts, they suck when they're not in your favor...
@DanielDamascusKimery I consider myself a Tea Party member,but I am ashamed that politically you might be a part of my movement. If you are a Tea Party supporter,please leave the movement. Our movement don't need the likes of you. We don't need the sort of disgusting low life who would take pleasure at a tragedy where people are hurt and dead. If you are in our movement---GO AWAY!!!!
@sleedolfine15 Hell, the Tea Party is nothing more than an incoherent mass of vitriol. Your "movement" has gotten smaller in numbers and got more violent in rhetoric. You guys got what you wanted, stand proud of it.
@robertmike57 Hmmm,incoherent mass?? That shrinking incoherent mass seemed to have elected a whole lot of people. LOL. Wishful thinking,my friend. Your side of the arguement just got your asses whupped. And please keep trying to blame our movement for the Arizona shooting. It only serve to make you people--as all the polls show,look foolish and insensitive to the vast American public. The public is far too smart to buy your let's blame conservatives for the actions of a deranged nutjob. HA!!
Although I see you making many claims, but no proof. Incoherent mass, the message of the Tea Party, carried record numbers of elections. Smaller in numbers? As a matter of fact the number of people that consider themselves "liberal" has dropped dramatically, while the number of self professed conservatives has risen quite a bit. More violent rhetoric? Where? Other than in your mind and in the hopes of the liberal media, what instances do you have of that? Oh, yes, none.
Ok, I'll play, then please provide me with the proof as to why the bar stool economics is wrong...
Please explain why it is that if each person gets a 1% drop in their taxes, the person that pays $100,000 should not end up getting more money back then the person that pays $1,000 dollars, or the person that pays $0 dollars...
I'll wait for it... I know the math is hard... But hey, you're much smarter than me, so you're told by the liberal media...
@BringIt2TheMax Easy the rich are already way underpaying in taxes using that money to send jobs out of the country. That Bar Stool economics plays to stupid people, a piece of shit like Lee Doren knows that with the whores for the rich who employ him.
It's OK, I know math is hard, so lets look at it a different way... If everyone gets a 1% cut in their taxes, the rich guy will still pay $99,000 ($1,000 of his tax) the middle class guy will pay $990 ($10 off his tax), and the guy that pays $0 will still pay zero.
So, what tax rate should the rich pay to not be underpaying in your world? It sounds to me like you are jealous and envious of their success, thus using spite and the tax code toward them to take out that aggression.
@robertmike57 So, "what tax rate should the rich pay to not be underpaying in your world?"
How much of a persons money do you think the government should take from them for you to be satisfied that they have paid their share?
Because here are the facts: The wealthiest 1% make 19% of the national income and pay 37% of the income tax; the top 10% pay 68% of tax. While, the bottom 50% earn 13% of the national income but pay just 3% of the taxes.
@BringIt2TheMax Still spewing out irrelevant crap. Used to be the top 1% made 9% of the national income, now its 23%. But the rich progandaist never mention that when they provide the crap you use (think you're telling me something i don't know?). anyway, putting the top tax rate in line with other 1st world countries seems reasonable, except to the rich bullshitting everyone else, around 45% based on what I have figured.
@robertmike57 So your mad that the rich pay 10% less of their income then you think is right (current tax rate is 35%)? Really... So, lets say that it was 70% like it was from about 1936 until 1980, would you be OK with a tax cut then, or is your 45% just a number that makes you seem sensible, until you can take more later?
As to irrelevant crap, I see Keith Olbermann is now unemployed. I'm sure he paid more in taxes just because he could, right? 99 weeks of unemployment will be good for him.
Giffords was an arrogant israel supporter and promoted the rights of illegal aliens. Now she has no brain.
mysirius1000 3 months ago
@mysirius1000
Although politically I disagree with her, your comments are disgusting...
BringIt2TheMax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
$5 MILLION REWARD FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE ARREST AND CONVICTION OF CORRUPT MAYOR ROBERT E WALKUP FOR HIS ALLEGED ROLE IN THE CONSPIRACY IN THE KIDNAPPING AND MURDER OF SUKI ON 1/5/2011 IN TUCSON AZ.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
pimakilledsuki 5 months ago
geeze you get all that from me because you didn't make it clear what you were talking about in your video huh?
I guess you're clairvoyant then.
CaseRed0605 9 months ago
@CaseRed0605
No, I'm not clairvoyant, just stating the obvious, and now confirmed because you didn't deny it, you just tried to use a snarky comment to try and defect from it.
Thanks for your comments though...
BringIt2TheMax 9 months ago
@BringIt2TheMax So, because of your lack of pointing out precisely what you meant, and me commenting about it, you got from that, that I think "liberal politicians are elected for life and that I think people should get government benefits for life..."
All because your lack of clarity. Interesting. Paranoid much?
CaseRed0605 9 months ago
@CaseRed0605
No actually I got it from this "since you have made such a ridiculously bad error in the first 5 seconds of your video it is impossible to take anything you say seriously afterwards." Only someone that would make the leap from what you believed (incorrectly) to be a single error to attack the entire video would also make the error of believing what I stated. And still you have yet to deny any of it...
Make logical errors much?
BringIt2TheMax 9 months ago
No wonder you'll lost. She was elected in 2006, so since you have made such a ridiculously bad error in the first 5 seconds of your video it is impossible to take anything you say seriously afterwards.
CaseRed0605 9 months ago
@CaseRed0605
And then she was elected again in 2008 along with President Obama (the time frame that this video deals with), I know may people like yourself probably believe that liberal politicians are elected for life (like you think people should get government benefits for life) but in the House of Representatives they are elected every two years...
Read your constitution Article 1, Section 2, Clause 1 lays it out...
Facts, they suck when they're not in your favor...
BringIt2TheMax 9 months ago
Maybe now she will slow her roll down lol.
DanielDamascusKimery 1 year ago
@DanielDamascusKimery
Disgusting... I feel very sad for you and your cavalier comment...
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago
@DanielDamascusKimery I consider myself a Tea Party member,but I am ashamed that politically you might be a part of my movement. If you are a Tea Party supporter,please leave the movement. Our movement don't need the likes of you. We don't need the sort of disgusting low life who would take pleasure at a tragedy where people are hurt and dead. If you are in our movement---GO AWAY!!!!
sleedolfine15 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sleedolfine15 Which Tea Party are you in? You probably want Sarah Palin to be President.
DanielDamascusKimery 1 year ago
@sleedolfine15 Hell, the Tea Party is nothing more than an incoherent mass of vitriol. Your "movement" has gotten smaller in numbers and got more violent in rhetoric. You guys got what you wanted, stand proud of it.
robertmike57 1 year ago
@robertmike57 Hmmm,incoherent mass?? That shrinking incoherent mass seemed to have elected a whole lot of people. LOL. Wishful thinking,my friend. Your side of the arguement just got your asses whupped. And please keep trying to blame our movement for the Arizona shooting. It only serve to make you people--as all the polls show,look foolish and insensitive to the vast American public. The public is far too smart to buy your let's blame conservatives for the actions of a deranged nutjob. HA!!
sleedolfine15 1 year ago
@robertmike57
Although I see you making many claims, but no proof. Incoherent mass, the message of the Tea Party, carried record numbers of elections. Smaller in numbers? As a matter of fact the number of people that consider themselves "liberal" has dropped dramatically, while the number of self professed conservatives has risen quite a bit. More violent rhetoric? Where? Other than in your mind and in the hopes of the liberal media, what instances do you have of that? Oh, yes, none.
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago
@BringIt2TheMax Someone who likes shit for brains Lee Doren's bar stool economics could care less about proof.
robertmike57 1 year ago
@robertmike57
Ok, I'll play, then please provide me with the proof as to why the bar stool economics is wrong...
Please explain why it is that if each person gets a 1% drop in their taxes, the person that pays $100,000 should not end up getting more money back then the person that pays $1,000 dollars, or the person that pays $0 dollars...
I'll wait for it... I know the math is hard... But hey, you're much smarter than me, so you're told by the liberal media...
Math is hard... I'll wait...
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago
@BringIt2TheMax Easy the rich are already way underpaying in taxes using that money to send jobs out of the country. That Bar Stool economics plays to stupid people, a piece of shit like Lee Doren knows that with the whores for the rich who employ him.
robertmike57 1 year ago
@robertmike57
It's OK, I know math is hard, so lets look at it a different way... If everyone gets a 1% cut in their taxes, the rich guy will still pay $99,000 ($1,000 of his tax) the middle class guy will pay $990 ($10 off his tax), and the guy that pays $0 will still pay zero.
So, what tax rate should the rich pay to not be underpaying in your world? It sounds to me like you are jealous and envious of their success, thus using spite and the tax code toward them to take out that aggression.
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago
@BringIt2TheMax since the whole premise is complete bullshit, the math is irrelevant
robertmike57 1 year ago
@robertmike57 So, "what tax rate should the rich pay to not be underpaying in your world?"
How much of a persons money do you think the government should take from them for you to be satisfied that they have paid their share?
Because here are the facts: The wealthiest 1% make 19% of the national income and pay 37% of the income tax; the top 10% pay 68% of tax. While, the bottom 50% earn 13% of the national income but pay just 3% of the taxes.
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago
@BringIt2TheMax Still spewing out irrelevant crap. Used to be the top 1% made 9% of the national income, now its 23%. But the rich progandaist never mention that when they provide the crap you use (think you're telling me something i don't know?). anyway, putting the top tax rate in line with other 1st world countries seems reasonable, except to the rich bullshitting everyone else, around 45% based on what I have figured.
robertmike57 1 year ago
@robertmike57 So your mad that the rich pay 10% less of their income then you think is right (current tax rate is 35%)? Really... So, lets say that it was 70% like it was from about 1936 until 1980, would you be OK with a tax cut then, or is your 45% just a number that makes you seem sensible, until you can take more later?
As to irrelevant crap, I see Keith Olbermann is now unemployed. I'm sure he paid more in taxes just because he could, right? 99 weeks of unemployment will be good for him.
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago
PELOSI PET
leotanker 1 year ago
Stupid leftist career politician, nothing more. Time for her to GO!
BIGLOVE4TRUTH 1 year ago
@BIGLOVE4TRUTH Amen. Bye Gabby!
DanielDamascusKimery 1 year ago
Great video. Let's smoke her on November 2nd.
locomio91660 1 year ago
@locomio91660
We should have smoked your parents before you were born trash!
SteroidsR4RealMen2 1 year ago
@SteroidsR4RealMen2
Wow, its great to see that such kind and loving people like you are out representing the left wing...
BringIt2TheMax 1 year ago