Day in the life of A Diamond girl

[powerlifted]

at least these girls dont take so much juice it restructures there face much! maybe the clit, and the voice though!! they all sound like they get thickening of the voice!

[omfggoogle]

Did she just glue her ass crack???

[kooch555]

id say something smartass... but that blond chick could clean and jerk my entire body anytime....full press... but i don't think she could handle a full ten reps....i'd have to warm up first...my phone number is 555-...

[petrilah]

good show - funny painter

[SoadIsAwesome87]

their suppose to look like bodybuilders? They look like sticks..well most of them.

[BeyondTheWorldsEnd]

man arms, those are gross in a bad way <_<

[SoldierCyfix]

their boobless, all the fat is gone, its all muscle

[ABL36]

so fucking hot..

[DJHulkHusky]

hahahahaha yo

YOU STOLE THE WORDS OUTA MY MOUTH!!! hahahaha

[ironlotus1]

hahahahahaha nice try dude. thats pretty nasty ok, so you can leave. doors over there. ---->

[alpsalish]

The only problem I have with this kinda stuff is that those muscles serve no utility. There is no point other than to have big muscles. So what? All these females should start a moving business or something.

[87fg]

They would be great bouncers. lol

[alpsalish]

Haha, I hadn't even thought of that. They would make great bouncers, but the drunks would still want a grab.

[ABL36]

Try telling that to Arnold Swaha;lc w/e his name is spelled. It's a form of art. And yes it also gives you a positive ego.

[alpsalish]

You would be hard pressed to convince anyone that this is a form of art. If you must call this art though, it should be noted that most of it is simply waste. That holds true in this case as well. Positive ego or not, there is no reason that this is necessary to massage the ego.

[ABL36]

who cares.

[ABL36]

then modeling is just as pointless

[alpsalish]

Don't think I disagree with you there.

[jenbanks561]

Isn't all art subjective? That is why there are so many forms. Who's to say painting is art? sculpting?music? This is not about ego. This is about challenge, self-improvement and a sense of accomplishment. Perhaps you should keep your mouth shut when you don't have anything worthwhile to contribute.

[alpsalish]

Muscle building has no basis in 'art' actually. Historically speaking, muscle is for function... for survival. Sure, paintings throughout time show very muscular heroes etc. Such muscularity was a false ideal created to reinforce the stories of old. In today's society working out is a luxury. People have never worked out for the sole purpose of image until more recently. It has pretty much always been about function until somewhat recently. For the sake of image alone, I am led to egoism.

[jenbanks561]

Skin, factually speaking, serves the purpose of creating an outer layer of protection for the body. By your definition, tatoos would be soley for the sake of image & egoism. Tatoos can be an amazing work of art simply exhibited on a different type of canvas. Where is your proof that people have never worked out for the sole purpose of image until recently? You're assuming there wasn't another platform available to exhibit muscular physiques. You know what they say about assuming...

[alpsalish]

Where is my proof that people never worked out for the sole purpose of image until recently? Look at more traditional cultures or even tribes that exist alongside modern societies today. Working out and sculpting the body is not a common thing. There is a reason for this as was mentioned. Sure, muscle serves a dual function; it plays into both image and survival (finding a mate based on desirable qualities etc). These diamond girls are showing their muscles off. Gym to stage with no function.

[alpsalish]

"You're assuming there wasn't another platform available to exhibit muscular physiques." No, this is not true. There may be other platforms for exhibiting muscular physiques, but none as consumed by the ego.

[hotforjpn]

@alpsalish I'd like to spread their legs and kick them 45 times in their pussy's

[lfields78]

@alpsalish What? Bodybuilding isn't necessary for survival? Astonishing! Sure, you could say the same about pretty much any human activity that isn't eating, sleeping, or procreative sex, but no, it's truly an amazing insight. Tell me, what utility does making ridiculously obvious comments on video sites have?

(If don't care if it *was* two years ago, this comment is literally one of the stupidest things I've ever seen on Youtube)

[alpsalish]

@lfields78 Notice how I said, bodybuilding serves the sole goal of image? You are very selective aren't you? You also seem to have omitted this statement:

"There may be other platforms for exhibiting muscular physiques, but none as consumed by the ego."

I get that you are plenty angry about my statements. Honestly though, after looking at your profile I really could have predicted such a response. BTW, you disgust me and so do your videos. Narrow-minded? Whatever...

[lfields78]

@alpsalish I'm not angry, it's just a really stupid and obvious thing to say. I don't really care if you don't like the look of muscular women, plenty of people don't. It's mostly an aesthetic practice, of course it's not inherently important. Presumably you hate people who go dancing as well, since "historically" moving ones body was for avoiding animals and gathering food, and the dancers are just gratifying their egos.

[alpsalish]

@lfields78 Reading this just now... Bodybuilding is absolutely an aesthetic practice as you mention. I like how you say this is for some reason or another not inherently important. Well, yes it is. It is a very defining characteristic of the "practice." There are few others. You continue to avoid this statement: "There may be other platforms for exhibiting muscular physiques, but none as consumed by the ego."

[alpsalish]

@lfields78 We can even use dancers as an example. Dancing is one platform where one benefits from maintaining muscular physique, but rarely is that a dominant characteristic. Look at dancing, historically and presently, and you will notice how rich it is in contrast to bodybuilding. I'm sorry, but you don't have a strong case. You might be very into bodybuilding, but in that case you should ask yourself what you've spent your life on...

[lfields78]

@alpsalish I have no idea what the fuck you're going on about. Bodybuilding contents are another form of beauty contests with different criteria. No one is denying this. Yet you keep going on stating the painfully obvious as if it's profound.

Whether it's an "art" obviously depends on how broad your definition is. People can certainly target certain muscles in certain ways for an overall aesthetic affect. You don't like it? NO ONE CARES.

[beerdeddi]

I want to start a bicep measurement battle

between all these girls and agriptest of the

hardness of all biceps...

[taioroman]

All these incredible physiques that anybody who like it can enjoy is due to all the efforts, work and sacrifices of those ladies!! They have all my admiration and respect!! Great job ladies, keep going, you have a lot of fans..me first!! Sorry for those who don't like..

[alpsalish]

Why are you sorry?

[taioroman]

You're right, I'm not!!

[SlimThickAngel]

@taioroman It's also due to their trainer, Craig, helping to train them to get into the physiques they strive for : )