Hitler Was a British Agent part 3of6

[undress4u]

LOL. seems you can't swing a dead cat around without hitting an illegitimate Rothschild.

[skybirdbird]

now just how the heck does he get all this info... come on now...

[CarstenDam]

If Hitler and Stalin were NOT in the "familly" that would be news.

[xander7ful]

Has anyone noticed that quite a few recent American presidents have had absent or missing fathers? Clinton's father was said to be a drunk who abandoned the family. Reagan's father was a drunk who abandoned the family. Gerald Ford was adopted, but under what circumstances I don't know. Obama's father is supposedly the Kenyan, but there's no resemblance. I've noticed this and it's too strange to be coincidence.

[xxxNiceLifexxx]

@xander7ful these are clones! rumsfeld pe is a clone of Generalfeldmarschall Maximilian von Weichs, a german...

[meelusine]

@xander7ful

Yeah ! Maybe ...

[UKBLIVE]

@xander7ful an no credible people come from their very young past... :)

[thepixieful]

stalin was a school yard bully, in recent biography, I have saved you time on a boring needless read but he was a school yard bully. Hitler was beaten as a child. there are behavior patterns. this guy is too simplistic I think, did he go to journalism school or have a degree in shrinkology??? but the banks and funding both sides is right out of G.B. Shaw's plays and could be spot on. and Tony Blair looks like George Harrison.

[prilstrudel]

Hitler and Churchill together destroyed the British Empire.

[ttimothymurphy]

this video contains alot of interesting and plausible ideas.

Greg Hallett does not come across as very authoritative though.

He needs to learn to offer evidence together with his radical claims.

I think he has got some evidence for his claims, but to sound credible he needs to make fewer claims and offer more evidence.

[caliNYCdoja]

@ttimothymurphy You should read the book.

[howtoplanaparty]

@ttimothymurphy What if the evidence source is "revelation"? That is not communicable from one person to another. The second person has to be equally open as the first person was.

[ttimothymurphy]

@howtoplanaparty

as it happens i am interested in ideas which are rooted in "revelation" too. But if the revelation is true, then credible-sounding evidence should be found and made more prominent so the need for "faith" in a revelation becomes unnecessary.

[howtoplanaparty]

@ttimothymurphy Not so. God said, "that (revelation) will be the rock, whereupon my church will be founded".

If one can't be revealed to, then they'll stay in ignorance. In other words, not to believe that, which was revealed, to the other person, but to be revealed to, yourself.

Logic isn't goin to get you, to there.

Revelation is the necessary part.

Without the ability, to be revealed to, you are not a valid member of any conversation.

[ttimothymurphy]

@howtoplanaparty

ok.

As you say, revelation is important. faith is important. etc.

However, do not use this to encourage GULLIBILITY!!

The bible does not say we have to believe some guy from new zealand who has some unexplained insight into Hitler.

In fact the bible bends over backwards to cite sources and evidence...

Have you seen the length of the genealogies at the begninning of the gospels? Not to mention the ones in the OT!!!