As interesting as this video is, I can't imagine how monotonous it must be when you're trapped in a metal tube for months at a time. I would have cabin fever like Jack Nicholson in the shining before too long. Not to mention there's no women around. Which can be nice for a few hours at a time, or maybe even a couple of days once in a while, but after a while I would need some pussy.
Everyone who thinks one is stronger then the other is an idiot, if we ever did go to war with Russia the whole dam world would have been destroyed. We both had and have enough nukes on just one side to do it a few times over.
so who the fk wanna leave in that world, dying of inoperable disease in snow and hungry, and people who r manning these subs understand it better then most of us , so stopcomparing which nation is better , just get along and enjoy the world
stop panicing, just relax and enjoy the world, your friends and relatives. if there's nuclear war ,we r all gonna die, some of us later but wi will be inoperapeble like aids and cancer 2gether but on a much faste scale, then temperature changes "nuclear winter " it's like ice age (no crops = no food) , and no electricity cuz electromagnetic pulses will knock out all electro stations ( goodbye internet, gps, mobile phones, computers, infra vision will be just guns and scarce food)
There is only 'unconstitutional' and 'not free speech media' when its convenient to USA government. I hope your government is going to burn in hell for all the killings it have done in the name of 'democracy'.
and yet, american's still have a TSA that strip-searches everyone at the airport, because government tries to keep you safe :)) bunch of jokers! One of these subs carries enough of Bulava missiles that can wipe 1/4th your country... yet you cannot attack Russia, even though your stupid propaganda/mainstream media says that there is violation of human rights in russia :)))
Kocham ten okret normalnie ;P..........mistrzostwo swiata a nie jakies gowniane,amerykanskie padaki jebane.ktore w kupie trzymaja jesynie ptasie odchody!!!!!!!!!!!
Captain uses chalk to write 'Fly in peace" at 1:20 :)
There was no deterrent to this weapon. Raegans SDI initially monitored the Arctic looking for launch signatures as well as the West setting up and manning observation posts in the area. From time of launch, Boston, NY, Philly, DC, Chicago would have been charred ruins within 3 mins; however Colorado would have been the prime target with at least 5 mt's raining down.
Serious shit from a serious weapon. MAD if it ever launched in anger.
Oh there was a deterrent, just another ballistic submarine. Ohio class subs were half the weight of a Typhoon but carried more missiles with more then double the firepower and greater range. Most important, there were 3 Ohios for each Typhoon. I don't think bombing Chicago or Colorado ever crossed the minds of Soviet strategists.
the typhoon might of been huge but it was the one of the quitest subs ever made. it would stay submerged for MONTHS at a time rather then a few hours like most subs. they werent built to be in enemy teritory or even their own for that matter - they were designed to be in the arctic under the ice where they were safe. their firepower was enough to penetrate the ice for an attack.
Absolutely correct. It was never intended as a stealth weapon and was easilly detectable up until the early 1980's. However, it was heavilly protected by a number of destroyers, frigates and Akula's as it made its way to the Arctic ice pack where upon the background noise from the ice packs made it impossible to detect. The Russians weren't too sophisticated at using Titanium metallurgy until the mid 80's when the sub became even more deadly. The West WAS terrified of this weapon
@kingbobnjoe There are a number of factors involved in finding a sub, but the most important is active detection vs passive detection. If a ship transmits actively (ie using active sonar) they will be detected at at least twice the distance that they detect anything. This is called counter-detection. As well when you look at the water profile there are "layers". If they are below or above these layers and your sensors are on the other side they can be very hard to detect. That is the Coles Notes
@tenb874 фишка в том, что ракеты для них во времена СССР строились на Украине. И уже 20 лет их никто не строит...Ракетам кирдык приходит, а переделать Акулу под другие....-проще сделать новую лодку. Вот и клепают Бореи. А акула походу плавает только одна, остальные уже давно гниют на причале.
.... dj время глобальных НАТОвских учений среди огромной объединенной групировки кораблей НЕОЖИДАНО всплыла такая наша "акула" и запросила помощь у НАТОвских моряков - быстроходный катер для доставки русского матроса с острым приступом аппендицита в ближайший порт... До этого момента НИКТО не подозревал о том что под ними на дне атлантики лежит 9этажная боевая махина и пасет их учения)))
... может всплывать, взламывая любой лед северного полюса ли разработана тактика торпедного подрыва льда. Автономное плавание без всплытия - 6 месяцев....
This thing its a Monster.. Im not russian.. but.. one thing its certain.. Nobody ever fuck with the russian.. Nobody in History defied or beat them.. and Russia its reorganizing itself now.. I wouldnt subestimate them.. never ever.. my respect
That swimming pool inside looked like they all piss and shit in it, yet they swim in it. The rest of the sub didn't look all that sanitary either. Im not Russian but still made me go "hmmm"
Yes, we have many things much vore advanced! ))) This sub can kill a cuple sities, just staying in it's port... It has 12 rokcets RS -22 (Black satan) on board
@hunkgod No, it means it can stray hidden much longer, by the way, this sub can stay completely undetected under the ice, but can still launch a 90 tone nuke intercontinental missile from under the ice capable of wiping out a big city.
Their purpose is to maintain diplomatic power, so that even the last submarine standing can still threaten the entire USA, since it can still deploy several 90 tone missiles, for that to happen you need BIG submarines.
Эти лодки .это как раз то .что подразумевается под выражением "Мир во всем Мире". Это как-раз зримое и осязаемое выражение того. что не дает свершиться 3 Мировой войне.
Их давно уже нету) Последнюю на лом летом отдали, а реально еще несколько лет назад, когда переоборудовали Долгорукого для пуск Булав вместо Донского) А уж если совсем реально, то если верить вики, с самых 90х они только и делали, что стояли без боекомплекта в доках большую часть времени
Eh????? and what are you thinking is bigger? Its about 20 ft longer and nearly double the width, and double the displacment of the Ohio class. 4 of the boat I was on would fit in it (sturgeon stretch hull SSN686).
@pondmaker Actually, acoustics is what determines how vulnerable a submarine is. It doesn't matter how big you are, as long as you remain silent in the water. The Seawolf class hunter-killer is vastly largely, yet also considerably more quiet, than the smaller Los Angeles. Additionally, the majority of torpedoes are only marginally faster then the submarines which launch them; giving submarines plenty of opportunity to evade, deploy decoys, launch counter-torpedoes, etc..
Project Akula was the official Russian name for this submarine. Typhoon is the NATO reporting name of this SSBN and Akula, meaning shark is the NATO reporting name of the attack sub.
hi i am from saudi arabia i am 17 years old i have invented a submarines one of the submarines is a 2 in 1 i mean it is a Aircraft carrier and submarine at the same time in saudi arabia no one adopted my ineveentions & i want some 1 to adopt it ok here is my e-mail if anyone wanna contact me ok : dhoomy220@hotmail.com pleas anyone know any body could do something like just contact me ok
@Husar101 Small objects are usually easier to hide than large objects. This sub is huge and needs huge and powerfull engines in order to move. That should result in considerable noise. Fire power is probably going to be stellar, but all you need is a torpedo in order to destroy a different vessel. I don't know about the sensors, but I trust that American electronics are superior to Russian.
In it's heyday (1980-1995) it was one of the quietest subs. It has a double hull with advanced noise reduction materials. It was designed to take position under the north pole where it cannot be tracked and can break through up to 4m (12 feet) of ice. It's firepower goes without saying if you know anything about it....which judging by your posts you don't
@Husar101 I doubt it is one of the quietest subs around. All modern subs have double hulls and noise reduction materials. That's a standard. But most are a lot smaller and lighter. Any modern diesel electric sub (also Russian) is stealthier than this big chunk. An uncovered sub is a sitting duck, an easy target. If you hide this sub under the arctic ice without moving around too fast then it has it's use as missile platform. Otherwise it's a grave, IMHO.
we're talking about the 1980's and 90's. It was one of the quietest at the time. And off course it's a missile carrier...what did you think it was? a coastal patrol sub? It's role was to deliver the knockout punch from under the ice after the initial nuclear exchange at the start of WW-3. It carries 20 missiles each with 10 nuclear warheads. That's 200 nuclear bombs per sub.
@Husar101 Well, then it really is of very limited use. Sorry, I don't like it. I would prefer to have 2-3 smaller and stealthier subs. Nevertheless, it is an impressive technical object
@Husar101 Every single nation except for the Russians has opted for plural smaller and stealthier subs. There seems to be broad agreement on this;-) So I don't have to wait for my private navy. This sub is just no good!
it's difficult to have a discussion with someone who has difficulty grasping the concept of different classes of subs. Every major navy has large, medium, small and mini subs. The Typhoon was built for the cold war with specific requirements for the time (fighting a nuclear war). It was the carrier for the RSM-52 (SS-N-20) SLBM. You can't fit ICBMs into a mini-sub...even today
@Husar101 Well, but having two to three smaller subs would have been the better decision. That's my opinion and that was also the opinion of the US navy.
like Husar said you're confusing strategic missile subs with the smaller attack subs. The US Navy actually has a large number of Ohio class boomers equipped with Trident missiles. They are also quite large in size. Essentially the missile boats are floating ICBM silos.
Imagine this thing popping up like right off say ---FT. Walton Beach or even better yet right in the mouth of Chesapeake Bay better yet the two remaining ones flying an IRANIAN FLAG ahhhhh!
@HeildemKrieg You are correct, since NATO did not have a designation for the Typhoon, they treated it as a variant of the Akula class. The Typhoon was a missle boat, the Akula was a fast attack sub. The three remaining Typhoons are set to be retired. I believe that there is only one in active service at this time. Four of t hem are in various stages of being scrapped whereas the U.S. still have 14 on active duty with 3 in for refueling and one set to be retired. Might be a little off.
1 is being used as a test bed for the Bulava SLBM while the other 2 are in storage. A plan to convert them into Naval commando platforms and cruise missile carriers is being considered depending on the financial feasibility. Otherwise they will probably be scrapped. The new Borei class will be the main Russian missile boats in the future
@LiebeFurVolk It is way ahead LA in firepower. This sub, as a combat unit, I think the most powerful weapon system mankind ever fielded. 24 MIRVed missiles each with 10 separate warheads, each equal to 50 Hiroshimas in power are an overkill in any war. Not even a United States as a nation amy survive just a couple salvos.
Great scenes from back when THE HISTORY CHANNEL actually showed Historical programming.... Not like THE "REALITY SHOW" Programming they have now.. TOP SHOT, ICE ROAD TRUCKERS, << WOWWWWWWWWWWWWW this is NOTTTTTTTTTTTT HISTORICAL IN ANYWAY,,,
WOW >! my friend was Captleutenant on Akula class submarien like this on hes russian but not crazy and primitive like most russuans are !
nightravenonline 2 days ago
As interesting as this video is, I can't imagine how monotonous it must be when you're trapped in a metal tube for months at a time. I would have cabin fever like Jack Nicholson in the shining before too long. Not to mention there's no women around. Which can be nice for a few hours at a time, or maybe even a couple of days once in a while, but after a while I would need some pussy.
kendigjl 1 week ago
My GOD the cold war gave us some wicked toys!!
greenseaships 1 week ago
Everyone who thinks one is stronger then the other is an idiot, if we ever did go to war with Russia the whole dam world would have been destroyed. We both had and have enough nukes on just one side to do it a few times over.
sgiroux10 3 weeks ago
In this case bigger is not better. All Typhoons are retired.
skyvilla 4 weeks ago
@skyvilla not all 6 are still in service
MultiCockta 4 weeks ago
@skyvilla except 1
KaiserReich98 3 weeks ago
@skyvilla What? The Russians still operate Akulas. In fact the Indians leased one from them as well.
88Dinger 4 days ago
@88Dinger You are confusing the attack sub Akula class with the Typhoon class ballistic missile sub which is called the Akula by the Russians.
skyvilla 4 days ago
so who the fk wanna leave in that world, dying of inoperable disease in snow and hungry, and people who r manning these subs understand it better then most of us , so stopcomparing which nation is better , just get along and enjoy the world
zlo333 1 month ago
stop panicing, just relax and enjoy the world, your friends and relatives. if there's nuclear war ,we r all gonna die, some of us later but wi will be inoperapeble like aids and cancer 2gether but on a much faste scale, then temperature changes "nuclear winter " it's like ice age (no crops = no food) , and no electricity cuz electromagnetic pulses will knock out all electro stations ( goodbye internet, gps, mobile phones, computers, infra vision will be just guns and scarce food)
zlo333 1 month ago
One SuperSub that can destroy the world with the new misiles, tested and loaded 2 months ago
CMATTEI1 1 month ago
sorry but if you see the facts : us army would smash russian arm without any problems!
UniteFightBack 1 month ago
@UniteFightBack No one cares about your bullshit.
RockRebel1998 4 weeks ago
Вроде как пара в строю ещё
petrosjanus 1 month ago
@petrosjanus По-моему их уже 6
UsaIceman100 1 month ago
It's got a damn swimming pool! Lucky for those sailors who want to be Olympic champions.
lionmancer9597 1 month ago
It's got a damn swimming pool!
lionmancer9597 1 month ago
this thing is the end of the world
mikefan09 1 month ago
now that wot the fuck im talking about! POWER!
mikefan09 1 month ago
gotta love the russians
TheSpyro94 1 month ago
1) Typhoon Class
2) Ohio Class
3) Oscar II Class
XBLChubbySkunk 1 month ago
Greetings from Sweden!
drmysko2 1 month ago
another ruski rusti nuclear crapsub exploded some day ago ruining the North Sea from russian nuclear waste
Get your crap out of the waters, and give the nuclear cores to germany. atl east they can transform that into electric energy
215alessio 1 month ago
savage grin of of socialism
Imprudentman 2 months ago
Tu polacy przejmujemy ten filmik panowie....
Hitman8624 2 months ago
ohio class is better than typhoon
chucknorris8675 2 months ago
Одного залпа боекомплекта такой лодки, хватит чтобы за 24 часа уничтожить любую страну блока НАТО. И никакие ПВО не поможет.
andrewilife 2 months ago
There is only 'unconstitutional' and 'not free speech media' when its convenient to USA government. I hope your government is going to burn in hell for all the killings it have done in the name of 'democracy'.
jenyaodessit 2 months ago
and yet, american's still have a TSA that strip-searches everyone at the airport, because government tries to keep you safe :)) bunch of jokers! One of these subs carries enough of Bulava missiles that can wipe 1/4th your country... yet you cannot attack Russia, even though your stupid propaganda/mainstream media says that there is violation of human rights in russia :)))
jenyaodessit 2 months ago
The missile fired at the end of video is American Cruise Missile, not Russian Ballistic Missile.
AnteyPL 2 months ago
wicked sinister vid, awesome!!!
mudylafeet 2 months ago
reminds me of the one in MW3
himynameiscameron1 2 months ago
what is this, is it when the tursk sunk?
MrBob2273 3 months ago
It goes down REALLY slow, a ohio could sink it and its a missle sub too
MrBob2273 3 months ago
Maybe this was the iceberg the Titanic hit, LOL. When it comes to submmarines, if it aint Russian or German U boat it aint a submarine XD
scoped98k 3 months ago
@scoped98k The Americans make very good submarines. Probably because they cost hundreds of millions of dollars each.
Whatheonearth 3 months ago
@Whatheonearth Try billions.
88Dinger 4 days ago
Typhoon is a BEAST.
I wish China build some thing in its class in the future.
Respect from a Chinese.
jiangshulin 3 months ago
It's all fun and games untill the reactor melts down. Happened many times with Ruskie subs.
ImFaceman 3 months ago
@ImFaceman Never has there ever been a nuclear meltdown in a Russian, OR an American submarine. Get your facts straight.
Whatheonearth 3 months ago
it's a fucking monster!!!! :O
sacredberserker 3 months ago
Kocham ten okret normalnie ;P..........mistrzostwo swiata a nie jakies gowniane,amerykanskie padaki jebane.ktore w kupie trzymaja jesynie ptasie odchody!!!!!!!!!!!
Nastavnik85 4 months ago
The best Submarine in the WORLD!!!!!!
Nastavnik85 4 months ago
Captain uses chalk to write 'Fly in peace" at 1:20 :)
There was no deterrent to this weapon. Raegans SDI initially monitored the Arctic looking for launch signatures as well as the West setting up and manning observation posts in the area. From time of launch, Boston, NY, Philly, DC, Chicago would have been charred ruins within 3 mins; however Colorado would have been the prime target with at least 5 mt's raining down.
Serious shit from a serious weapon. MAD if it ever launched in anger.
dandysquirrel 4 months ago
@dandysquirrel
Oh there was a deterrent, just another ballistic submarine. Ohio class subs were half the weight of a Typhoon but carried more missiles with more then double the firepower and greater range. Most important, there were 3 Ohios for each Typhoon. I don't think bombing Chicago or Colorado ever crossed the minds of Soviet strategists.
r8wing 3 months ago
It is Alliens battleship
Moshakocaf 4 months ago
Вы идете, чтобы перевести читать мои комментарии?
skatesfp 4 months ago
@skatesfp Yes!
PaperPlanes1997 3 months ago
What's the point of a huge sub? Isn't the idea to NOT be detected? How can Sonar miss this???
kingbobnjoe 4 months ago
@kingbobnjoe **sigh** Try to do some reading on the subject...
Robert111 4 months ago
@kingbobnjoe
after some research i have found out why.
the typhoon might of been huge but it was the one of the quitest subs ever made. it would stay submerged for MONTHS at a time rather then a few hours like most subs. they werent built to be in enemy teritory or even their own for that matter - they were designed to be in the arctic under the ice where they were safe. their firepower was enough to penetrate the ice for an attack.
frobinhood 4 months ago
@frobinhood
That's really interesting! Thanks for taking the time to share your research with me, I appreciate it. Have a good one!
kingbobnjoe 4 months ago
@frobinhood
Absolutely correct. It was never intended as a stealth weapon and was easilly detectable up until the early 1980's. However, it was heavilly protected by a number of destroyers, frigates and Akula's as it made its way to the Arctic ice pack where upon the background noise from the ice packs made it impossible to detect. The Russians weren't too sophisticated at using Titanium metallurgy until the mid 80's when the sub became even more deadly. The West WAS terrified of this weapon
dandysquirrel 4 months ago
@kingbobnjoe There are a number of factors involved in finding a sub, but the most important is active detection vs passive detection. If a ship transmits actively (ie using active sonar) they will be detected at at least twice the distance that they detect anything. This is called counter-detection. As well when you look at the water profile there are "layers". If they are below or above these layers and your sensors are on the other side they can be very hard to detect. That is the Coles Notes
88Dinger 4 days ago
All who the sword has cam - will perish by the sword ! ! !
MultiSpams 4 months ago
<Минобороны утилизирует атомные субмарины «Тайфун»
Пиздец.. Просто нет слов.. Не трожьте лодки !! Не вы их строили!!
tenb874 5 months ago
@tenb874 фишка в том, что ракеты для них во времена СССР строились на Украине. И уже 20 лет их никто не строит...Ракетам кирдык приходит, а переделать Акулу под другие....-проще сделать новую лодку. Вот и клепают Бореи. А акула походу плавает только одна, остальные уже давно гниют на причале.
Viruner 4 months ago
Russia need one good small car
batalion666 5 months ago
すげえーーーーーー
iiyamaman3 5 months ago
He has written "fly with peace"
foresterization 5 months ago 2
Im scared.
dominusetdeus060644 5 months ago
Now THAT'S a machine! :)
norisnezak 5 months ago
.... dj время глобальных НАТОвских учений среди огромной объединенной групировки кораблей НЕОЖИДАНО всплыла такая наша "акула" и запросила помощь у НАТОвских моряков - быстроходный катер для доставки русского матроса с острым приступом аппендицита в ближайший порт... До этого момента НИКТО не подозревал о том что под ними на дне атлантики лежит 9этажная боевая махина и пасет их учения)))
61papazson61 5 months ago
@61papazson61 gde info?
zlo333 1 month ago
...Скорость под водой - более 60 кмч...
61papazson61 5 months ago
... может всплывать, взламывая любой лед северного полюса ли разработана тактика торпедного подрыва льда. Автономное плавание без всплытия - 6 месяцев....
61papazson61 5 months ago
wow niiiiicccceeee
DutchSoundz 5 months ago
5.14 торпедолов,нет?
TheAleksey8 5 months ago
This behemoth has 3 pressure hulls. Absolutely rediculous in size and power
mattmatt115 5 months ago
5 dislikes = 5 NATO bitches... :)
MegaSalajka 5 months ago
Осталась одна, и то не на боевом дежурстве
Antikolian 5 months ago
@Antikolian Дмитрий Донской . На боевом дежурстве.
61papazson61 5 months ago
@Antikolian
Что за дезинформация.Их 3 штуки
ТК-17 «Архангельск
ТК-20 «Северсталь»
ТК-208 Дмитрий Донской
MrDaxx85 5 months ago
Biggest sub I have ever seen, as big as a heavy cruiser
pxy24x28 5 months ago
Straight from Hell :)
SovjetPhoenix 6 months ago
This thing its a Monster.. Im not russian.. but.. one thing its certain.. Nobody ever fuck with the russian.. Nobody in History defied or beat them.. and Russia its reorganizing itself now.. I wouldnt subestimate them.. never ever.. my respect
lucca101able 6 months ago
@lucca101able
Never ever? Hello, World War One Germany ring a bell?
kingbobnjoe 4 months ago
@kingbobnjoe still didn't beat
zlo333 1 month ago
20 submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM) - SS-N-20 Sturgeon,(Russ The R-39 Rif).
Warhead 10 x 200 Kt each. In total - 200 Warhead
dm1968r 6 months ago
That swimming pool inside looked like they all piss and shit in it, yet they swim in it. The rest of the sub didn't look all that sanitary either. Im not Russian but still made me go "hmmm"
KhazariaProject 6 months ago
RUSSIA-SUPER!
TheAzero19 6 months ago
Yes, we have many things much vore advanced! ))) This sub can kill a cuple sities, just staying in it's port... It has 12 rokcets RS -22 (Black satan) on board
Sorry for my english...
Nikitos230 6 months ago
Yes, we have many things much vore advanced! )))
Nikitos230 6 months ago
That thing is a fuckin' monster
richieh1980 6 months ago
@mirrorny nothing worth buying,that's for sure.
P3T3R582 7 months ago
the widomaker
MALDHAHI 7 months ago
Is the Akula (Typhoon class) The "Top of the line" sub in the Russian navy? Or is there another yet more advanced?
P3T3R582 7 months ago
A beautiful piece of military hardware. Thing is freakin HUGE.
P3T3R582 7 months ago
it's RUSSIANNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
trek8900zk 7 months ago 27
@trek8900zk no.., its RRRRRRRUSSIAN
MrPPPAAAVVVEEELLL 2 months ago
@trek8900zk я слежу за вами Америкашки!
snejenok 1 month ago
Bigger just means easier to spot and blow up
hunkgod 7 months ago
@hunkgod No, it means it can stray hidden much longer, by the way, this sub can stay completely undetected under the ice, but can still launch a 90 tone nuke intercontinental missile from under the ice capable of wiping out a big city.
VERGIS92 7 months ago 2
Their purpose is to maintain diplomatic power, so that even the last submarine standing can still threaten the entire USA, since it can still deploy several 90 tone missiles, for that to happen you need BIG submarines.
VERGIS92 7 months ago
@hunkgod this is a typhoon class Russ sub. and anti radar.. not easy to detect. under the water is invisible...
Ben998x 7 months ago
@hunkgod No it doesn't.
88Dinger 4 days ago
Эти лодки .это как раз то .что подразумевается под выражением "Мир во всем Мире". Это как-раз зримое и осязаемое выражение того. что не дает свершиться 3 Мировой войне.
И будет так во веки веков.
rogovalll 7 months ago 22
@rogovalll распилили уже все акулы благодаря договору СНВ :/
c2x83 2 months ago
@c2x83 во первых, не распилили. Во вторых убирать из состава флота их будут по другой причине.
Viruner 2 months ago
@rogovalll
Их давно уже нету) Последнюю на лом летом отдали, а реально еще несколько лет назад, когда переоборудовали Долгорукого для пуск Булав вместо Донского) А уж если совсем реально, то если верить вики, с самых 90х они только и делали, что стояли без боекомплекта в доках большую часть времени
lolshtoo 1 month ago
this music 6:28 , how is it called???
MightyU2 7 months ago
nado bylo ee primenit-a schas flot rezut na chasti i zidy s statov za bumashki skupajut rossiju
apelsinas691 7 months ago
I fucking love submarine movies. Wach 'Das Boot' if you've never seen it. Great drama based around a U-boat crew.
Nautilus1972 8 months ago
this was a manly submarine
ColKorn1965 8 months ago
each buluva missile this thing holds carries seven 100 kiloton warheads. it carries 20 of these missiles. hiroshima was 18 kilotons...
igotN0ceilings 8 months ago
sound is awesome. what is that? reminds me aliens 2
AllofStewie 8 months ago 3
@AllofStewie
it's from alliens
Husar101 8 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Nuke sub made sure no nation to start a war, the mass destruction power is unimagiable
No war mongering nation, or it will come back hunt you
Russian nuke sub regulary cruise american sea coast is a worrisome fact
Chines has 12 nuke sub known, or even more, since they don't release this info
NO WAR FOREVER ! OR WE ALL DIE !!!
energyalt56 5 months ago
it is the biggest by displasement at least
blipman17 8 months ago
the Russian typhoon is almost the biggest submarine in the world
RandyV8MW2 8 months ago
@RandyV8MW2
Eh????? and what are you thinking is bigger? Its about 20 ft longer and nearly double the width, and double the displacment of the Ohio class. 4 of the boat I was on would fit in it (sturgeon stretch hull SSN686).
AOSC30K 8 months ago
Yes wire guided Torpedoes are slow. The the Russian "Shkval" is the exception. More an underwater rocket - 400km per hour.
US citizen - Edmond Pope (Captain, USN, retired)was convicted for trying to steal the secrets of this Torpedo/Rocket in 2000.
rkapo7 8 months ago
This warmachine can wipe out an entire country with it's warheads or maybe even more....
TheKimberry666 9 months ago
They should code name the Sub "Sitting Duck".
pondmaker 9 months ago
@pondmaker Actually, acoustics is what determines how vulnerable a submarine is. It doesn't matter how big you are, as long as you remain silent in the water. The Seawolf class hunter-killer is vastly largely, yet also considerably more quiet, than the smaller Los Angeles. Additionally, the majority of torpedoes are only marginally faster then the submarines which launch them; giving submarines plenty of opportunity to evade, deploy decoys, launch counter-torpedoes, etc..
I2e4L 8 months ago
holy cow that thing is huge
MegaJim555 9 months ago
thats acula.24 nuclear rockets 8 heads each. that means 24*8 hirosimas
ruulis 9 months ago
@ruulis ok?
The Ohio Class SSBNs can hold 24 Trident II D5 SLBMs, each with 12 W76 or W88 warheads
NecroAsphyxia 8 months ago
thats acula.24 nuclear rockets 8 heads each
ruulis 9 months ago
thats acula
ruulis 9 months ago
2:42, his job must be very important.
groam6666 9 months ago
its probably been said before but a Typhoon is NOT an Akula, Typhoon SSBN Bomber, Akula SSN Attack Submarine i believe
discomjim 9 months ago
@discomjim
Project Akula was the official Russian name for this submarine. Typhoon is the NATO reporting name of this SSBN and Akula, meaning shark is the NATO reporting name of the attack sub.
thinkforthefuture 9 months ago
@thinkforthefuture yeah i stand corrected, didnt know they used akula name as well as NATO :)
discomjim 8 months ago
its Russia
not u.s media shit
AKELES07 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi i am from saudi arabia i am 17 years old i have invented a submarines one of the submarines is a 2 in 1 i mean it is a Aircraft carrier and submarine at the same time in saudi arabia no one adopted my ineveentions & i want some 1 to adopt it ok here is my e-mail if anyone wanna contact me ok : dhoomy220@hotmail.com pleas anyone know any body could do something like just contact me ok
abod7887 9 months ago
Impressive. But, then, size is not really an advantage for a sub, stealth, sensors and fire power are important, in that order!
bhigr 9 months ago
@bhigr
and what makes you think it didn't have all that?....Hollywood?
Husar101 9 months ago
@Husar101 Small objects are usually easier to hide than large objects. This sub is huge and needs huge and powerfull engines in order to move. That should result in considerable noise. Fire power is probably going to be stellar, but all you need is a torpedo in order to destroy a different vessel. I don't know about the sensors, but I trust that American electronics are superior to Russian.
bhigr 9 months ago
@bhigr
In it's heyday (1980-1995) it was one of the quietest subs. It has a double hull with advanced noise reduction materials. It was designed to take position under the north pole where it cannot be tracked and can break through up to 4m (12 feet) of ice. It's firepower goes without saying if you know anything about it....which judging by your posts you don't
Husar101 9 months ago
@Husar101 I doubt it is one of the quietest subs around. All modern subs have double hulls and noise reduction materials. That's a standard. But most are a lot smaller and lighter. Any modern diesel electric sub (also Russian) is stealthier than this big chunk. An uncovered sub is a sitting duck, an easy target. If you hide this sub under the arctic ice without moving around too fast then it has it's use as missile platform. Otherwise it's a grave, IMHO.
bhigr 9 months ago
@bhigr
we're talking about the 1980's and 90's. It was one of the quietest at the time. And off course it's a missile carrier...what did you think it was? a coastal patrol sub? It's role was to deliver the knockout punch from under the ice after the initial nuclear exchange at the start of WW-3. It carries 20 missiles each with 10 nuclear warheads. That's 200 nuclear bombs per sub.
Husar101 9 months ago
@Husar101 Well, then it really is of very limited use. Sorry, I don't like it. I would prefer to have 2-3 smaller and stealthier subs. Nevertheless, it is an impressive technical object
bhigr 9 months ago
@bhigr
good luck with your own private navy
Husar101 9 months ago
@Husar101 Every single nation except for the Russians has opted for plural smaller and stealthier subs. There seems to be broad agreement on this;-) So I don't have to wait for my private navy. This sub is just no good!
bhigr 9 months ago
@bhigr
it's difficult to have a discussion with someone who has difficulty grasping the concept of different classes of subs. Every major navy has large, medium, small and mini subs. The Typhoon was built for the cold war with specific requirements for the time (fighting a nuclear war). It was the carrier for the RSM-52 (SS-N-20) SLBM. You can't fit ICBMs into a mini-sub...even today
Husar101 9 months ago
@Husar101 Well, but having two to three smaller subs would have been the better decision. That's my opinion and that was also the opinion of the US navy.
bhigr 9 months ago
@bhigr
like Husar said you're confusing strategic missile subs with the smaller attack subs. The US Navy actually has a large number of Ohio class boomers equipped with Trident missiles. They are also quite large in size. Essentially the missile boats are floating ICBM silos.
tass101 9 months ago
@Husar101 Glavnoe shto est' sauna, parilochka, i bar.
FelixRohatyn 9 months ago
@FelixRohatyn
Good one lol.
I didn't get around to mentioning those features
Husar101 9 months ago
I want one for Christmas. :3
WonkyTonkBotty 9 months ago
Just want to know, the range of this submarine is only limited by its food supply right?
mchief190 10 months ago
@mchief190
in theory yes. That and the crew going crazy
Husar101 10 months ago 4
Fucken Beast !!!!!!
YUSKHAN 10 months ago
where can i buy one? lol
igotN0ceilings 10 months ago
Comment removed
YUSKHAN 10 months ago
this thing is an amazing piece of engineering, love it, will be sad the see the back of these huge war machines.
Keep them coming Russia
Mr2pint 10 months ago
Guy at 1:20 wrote "Fly with Peace" watch full German doc
gigobait 10 months ago
thanks God ,now we got plenty inexpensiv titanium frame hand guns, thanks titanium builded submarines solded to america.;)
tjablonskism 10 months ago
Nice vid, thanks
aus2045 10 months ago
but will it blend?
SovietUnity 11 months ago
Comment removed
dorristhecat 11 months ago
Comment removed
igotN0ceilings 11 months ago
Imagine this thing popping up like right off say ---FT. Walton Beach or even better yet right in the mouth of Chesapeake Bay better yet the two remaining ones flying an IRANIAN FLAG ahhhhh!
deltaalpha21074 11 months ago
@HeildemKrieg
Spot on.
Husar101 11 months ago
@HeildemKrieg You are correct, since NATO did not have a designation for the Typhoon, they treated it as a variant of the Akula class. The Typhoon was a missle boat, the Akula was a fast attack sub. The three remaining Typhoons are set to be retired. I believe that there is only one in active service at this time. Four of t hem are in various stages of being scrapped whereas the U.S. still have 14 on active duty with 3 in for refueling and one set to be retired. Might be a little off.
Matthewthematador 11 months ago
@Matthewthematador
1 is being used as a test bed for the Bulava SLBM while the other 2 are in storage. A plan to convert them into Naval commando platforms and cruise missile carriers is being considered depending on the financial feasibility. Otherwise they will probably be scrapped. The new Borei class will be the main Russian missile boats in the future
Husar101 11 months ago
@HeildemKrieg
only one is enough, when we are talking about this one.
FlickOz 11 months ago
That's the reason why Russia will never be in war with anybody.
Because strong nation doesn't need to prove anything to anybody.
FlickOz 11 months ago
Russian never gang !!! USA = ;(( !!
spams3538 11 months ago
Can submerge up to 6 months
JineshJK 11 months ago
удар США с ядерным оружием, пожалуйста
deltaalpha21074 11 months ago
Is this bigger then Los Angelas Class?
LiebeFurVolk 1 year ago
@LiebeFurVolk About twice the size....
halo07guy2 1 year ago
@halo07guy2 and also BIGGER than Invincible Class Light Carrier, Royal Navy!
discomjim 7 months ago
@LiebeFurVolk It is way ahead LA in firepower. This sub, as a combat unit, I think the most powerful weapon system mankind ever fielded. 24 MIRVed missiles each with 10 separate warheads, each equal to 50 Hiroshimas in power are an overkill in any war. Not even a United States as a nation amy survive just a couple salvos.
zipacna1980 11 months ago
Great scenes from back when THE HISTORY CHANNEL actually showed Historical programming.... Not like THE "REALITY SHOW" Programming they have now.. TOP SHOT, ICE ROAD TRUCKERS, << WOWWWWWWWWWWWWW this is NOTTTTTTTTTTTT HISTORICAL IN ANYWAY,,,
hollywoodhottie19 1 year ago
You know the Akula is a different sub. XD
HajtomY 1 year ago
@HajtomY
No it's not!
We've been over this a million times already.
Husar101 1 year ago
actually it is different, what we in the west know as "akula" is actually a russian "alpha"
DRPadmologist 1 year ago
@HajtomY not really, they're just NATO designations for a few classes
Ahamster1 1 year ago