Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
@myandelizagn "Dr Mitch Taylor has researched Polar Bears for 30 years"
alexhamster1134 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A barrel floating in the ocean will grow a seaweed farm. It would be easy to create rainforest sized algae farms mid ocean. The seaweed farms would photosynthesis, as well as the lifeforms themselves would be made of carbon.
Cheap. Proactive. Harmless.
Also mid ocean seaweed (algae) farms could be towed to counties in need for emergency food fuel.
No downside.
Build seaweed farms from shore and tow them out to sea and anchor them. Polluting companies could sponsor the low costs.
Win Win Win
RichLOAguy 2 years ago
He is a DR (obviously) and has been researching the status and management of polar bears in Canada and around the Arctic Circle for 30 years
1madaboutguitar 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wikipedia article for Scientific opinion on climate change:
"With the release of the revised statement by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists in 2007, no remaining scientific body of national or international standing is known to reject the basic findings of human influence on recent climate change."
NO REMAINING SCIENTIFIC BODY. ZERO. ZILCH. NADA. CERO. Got it???
ThinkTank255 2 years ago
Dude i can't hear a single thing his saying! even on high quality!
marineninga 2 years ago
It's not great quality, but I used headphones and heard it OK. Very interesting clip from an expert who clearly knows his subject and is not fooled by the IPCC nonsense.
Jm600r 2 years ago
I believe that this guy is right and IPCC is out for money!
But the sound quality.....
marineninga 2 years ago
Of course. Anyone who disagrees with you is just looking for money, but anyone who propagates your pre-conceived notions must be true.
It doesn't matter that many skeptics get funding from the energy industry, does it?
It's probably also worth stating that the IPCC receives no money whatsoever. That's been one of its criticisms, that doesn't include enough scientists because it can't pay them to be there.
DeusExMachina7709 2 years ago
Since when were skeptics out for money? Noone has ever gotten money from the oil industry yet! Your just using the old smoking industry scam and thinking were doing the same!
marineninga 2 years ago
"Noone has ever gotten money from the oil industry yet!"
What's funny is that the oil industry disagrees with you.
They have to publish their annual account. Anyone can see that they fund groups which are adamantly denialist.
Bob Carter and Richard Lindzen have already been revealed to have received money in the past from them.
DeusExMachina7709 2 years ago
whats your problem?
Do you have this "skeptics are evil because they disagree with me" mentality?
Show us the proof that they did! Links!
marineninga 2 years ago
I'm just trying to correct misinformation.
dieoff . org/page82 . htm
smh . com . au/news/environment/minchin-denies-climate-change-manmade/2007/03/14/1173722560417 . html
DeusExMachina7709 2 years ago
broken link....
marineninga 2 years ago
@DeusExMachina7709 youre labelling "denialist" as if they are somehow wrong? since when is presenting the opposite opinion automatically "bad"? what real science does, presents a platform for debating all sides of the story. has it ever occurred to you that the reason energy companies are "giving money to scientists" is because they paint an accurate picture of the truth?
alexhamster1134 1 year ago