Obviously you didn't pay attention. We made it clear that he could not see the Pentagon but obviously he had a much better view about the approach direction of the plane from the river. This fatally contradicts all official reports and data. The witnesses to the plane north of the Citgo are who prove it did not hit the light poles or Pentagon.
If you crackpots think a missile hit the Pentagon then tell me this, where are the passengers & flight crew from Flight 77 ? Did they ALL decide to take a permanent vacation together on 9 / 11 at the same time and never return back to their lives, families, jobs, etc. ? You people CAN'T be that stupid.
@iwinofcourse You Managed several fallacies of deception in your conclusion.Hasty Generalization due to inadequate evidence and Limited Choice by precluding options to start with.By using the appeal to ignorance with lack of validity in your hypothesis the spectrum of measurement limits you as you moved to the Red herring and it forces the premises of your inductive reasoning to become blatantly false.In the exposition provided by NIST all propositions limit strength removing deductive capacity
@andyjoep Wow Andy, we're all sooooo impressed with your eloquence and use of the English language but it didn't amount to shit because all you did is dance around my question JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE on here. Hypothesis ? No it's facts, so either answer the question or shut the fuck up. By the way, the words managed, limited, choice and generalization did not require to be capitalized shit for brains. Can you say Aduuuurrrrr ?
@iwinofcourse The fact you are asking the question is adequate enough to show it has not been answered and clearly not a deductive argument. You may want to call the FBI and DOJ and ask why they are investigating this matter as we speak. They are the ones who decided to do an investion because it is clear the 911 exposition by NIST is a FAIL and now they must do the right thing. Call them and find out for yourself because you look and sound like a morom right now.
@andyjoep I don't have to call anyone Andy because " normal " people know the truth, it was right there in front of us, it's people like you that want to twist and mislead people on what the truth is. Where are the passengers & crew Andy ? Did you see the " airplane " debris all over the Pentagon lawn when you Googled Flight 77 wreckage ? How about the eyewitnesses on the ground and in their cars that saw the plane ? Don't kid yourself Andy, you're still a moron.
Well actually ur the moron cause if you take all the dimensions of an aircraft as well as the sheer mass you will see that there are major holes in the official story. Any type of plane crash you see something that says...plane crash!!! Fire, smoke, debris. The only debris at the Pentagon was clean pieces of aluminum that could be picked up by hand. What about the 2 8-ton Pratt & Witney jumbo jet titanium engines? Did they evaporate?
@generalmaximus53 "The only debris at the Pentagon was clean pieces of aluminum that could be picked up by hand. What about the 2 8-ton Pratt & Witney jumbo jet titanium engines? Did they evaporate? "
There were several LARGE pieces of the engine, and the landing gear. The problem you morons have is that you're looking at the lawn for plane debris. It's the equivalent of car crashing through a wall and you not believing it b/c the car isn't in the parking lot!
@lytetrip actually all eyewitneesses saw a plane crash into the pentagon. None saw anything but, several PILOTS identified it as an American Airlines 757. One guy was on the lawn. I doubt a guy, on a boat, several MILES away from the crash had a better view than a guy who was almost got hit by the plane. Eyewitnesses saw a plane crash into the pengaton, plane debris matching AA 757, DNA of passengers, FDR, and eyewitnesses who saw bodies still strapped to their seats. CASE CLOSED!!
He is scripted and its too proper. Who says "Eastern Sky"? Runway? No, nobody uses the word runway, they say land. "Flight path"? "Banked in"? For how frantic 9/11 was I'm surprised how calm he is
Liar...no one on local news saw a plane flying steeply in to the pentagon..and again the light poles are still intact outside the pentagon on the so called "direct flight path"
Fishing at the sewage treatment plant? We must assume he has been doing that for some time and with some success:: He's full of shit. It's coming out everywhere!. Whatever he saw it wasn't the plane that hit. He just saw a plane, maybe
I don't know what you are talking about Ralo. My husband was a first responder (as well as myself)....we both picked up plane parts (as well as victims) and there was even a plane lavatory/burned seats inside the Pentagon that still had victims and body parts. Unless you know what you're talking about or were there - I would keep your crazy conspiracy theories to yourself.
@zgreggz83 - yeah....you can actually visit the Old Guard unit at Fort Myer, VA. At their headquarters building, they have a display of pictures, artifacts, etc showing my husband and his unit going into the Pentagon as first responders. The soldiers of Bravo Company and Charlie Company, The Old Guard, US Army were the main first responders that were sent into the Pentagon with just their BDUs for the first week....they risked their lives and welfare to help others.
@zgreggz83 - I feel that unless ANY of you were ACTUALLY there at the crash site, you should really keep your opinions on this tragedy to yourself. There are a lot of people, including myself and my husband, that still have to live day to day with the images we witnessed that horrific day.
@zgreggz83 - I apologize to you then zgreggz83.....you were just asking....sorry about beating up on you....it's an emotional topic and some other people on this page have been quite negative.
@ushiiceo I cant believe all these people who STILL think it was a missile,ive been fighting them for months. Im SO glad you guys are here to help. Thanks so much for your part being there and being here.
LIsten, there was no wreckage. Look at the pentagram before the upper rim collapsed. That's all any intelligent person needs to see that a 757 did not crash there. Just like the newsman said, No sign of an airliner hitting anywhere near the pentagon. The plane couldn't fit into the hole. The wings, the seats, bodies, engines, tailsection would have made impact damage. The tail section, wings and engines would have messed up the side of the building. It didn't. LIERS
Either his brain has been fried from eating those filthy fish or he has been paid well. Has he upgraded his boat or bought a holiday home since 9/11??
What leads anyone to believe that this guy is genuine? So one guy renders the black box AND radar paths false? The guy was probably drunk and doesn't even know what he saw
6:44 "To me it looked like just a commercial airliner. Didn't look like anything else. Just looked like a normal commercial airliner that was, the kind we see land and take off every 3, 3/12 minutes here out on the water."
Nice try jhouse770. You either didn't watch the video very carefully or you're just a liar trying to confuse people about this smoking gun proof that the NTSB released fraudulent radar data.
There's a lot more interviews at CitizenInvestigationTeam . com proving deception
At 6:50 he says it looked like a "normal commercial airliner" that he sees every 3+ mins there on the water. Then it is repeated again @ 6:55. LOL, did you not watch the whole thing? or just not very observant :)
OK, both of you dumb asses. If it was a plane that hit the pentagon there would be debris from it. And before you try to leave a comment saying it burned up, the engines would definitely be there. Fuel under combustion in a jet engine burns way hotter than it does just spilled out on the ground. So know your facts you illiterate retards, and take something from someone who's actually got a fricken clue about anything. Thanks for your time.
This is a 4 month old comment that I'm replying to, but well... there was debris. Including human debris, if you must know. Try to read both sides of an argument before you attack the other side.
Google '9/11 popular mechanics' to read a report involving 300 scientific experts and eyewitnesses. That should be compelling evidence to any intelligent person.
@LordBalto I suppose you know this using your smell-o-scope, lol. Any random scumbag could lie about what it supposedly smelled like. Skepticism is your friend.
I used to live in the area, and I'm pretty familiar with the river as well. Given that he was so far south, I doubt that he could have distinguished between a plane an a (much closer) bird. That's a long way .....
LOL, right on:) How could anybody distinguish between a bird or a 90 ton airliner. Must be some big birds on that river beside the waste treatment plant ! lol
weither it was a missle or a plane it doesnt matter.. the pentagon is supposed to be the most secure building in the world. it has cameras all along the edge of the roof.. yet the only thing they released was ONE picture of a fireball.. and teh picture was dated 9/12..... so there is obviously something fishy to it all... weither it was a plane or not.
where are all these security cameras you claim were all along the edge of the roof at the Pentagon? I think you have been listening to to many conspiracy theorists! Show us all these cameras you say were there! And now your saying the crash video was taken on 9/12? you conspiracy theorist are reaching deep!
yea this is some new shit.. this is kinda stupid.. wasn't there also a mistery plane that was seen after the explosion fllying near the white house.. maybe that is the plane he saw
Google this Mark humprey 911 actor from iron eagle 2 google Bertha champagne Google earth flight 93 crash site same hole no plane last youtube building 7 and type in 5 dancing israelies and know u been had go back 2 sleep
Also, you do know that the plane that hit the Pentagon took off from Dulles airport out in Va., not Reagan National. You do understand that, right? Why don't you have any info on
He Seen A Plane Right? Yet There Is No Evidence Of A Plane Crashing In The Pentagon. No Wing, No Egine, No Seats, Literally Nothing. Look Up "Only Aired Once About Pentagon". And Pentagon Conspiracy. There Was No Plane. It Was A Missle.
@Ralo13 a misile,your an idiot/ where did all those people go that died in the plane. How about the 5 light posts that were knocked over/they were 45 feet apart. You show me a missile with a 50 ft wingspan . Go back to your comic book
@gladheateher4now Light poles were a simple parlor trick, who care about the people, you can not account for the hole in the wall. Therefore NO PLANE crashed into the pentagon. Did you see Building 7? Don't be stupid.
@UNTC321 ARE you for real ? Parlor tricks? So a group of 10 guys knocked over the light poles before a missile hit? People like you make be sick. There are photos of people still in there seats burning in that wreckage bud/people have seen those. So before you comment,do some homework. so if it was a missile. Tell me how a hole in the wall might occure. You ever thought of some part of that plane like wheels or one of the engines causing that hole/ my god people are stupid
@UNTC321 no your the fool / engines fall off as they crash and so do plane tires you idiot. What part of photos of people strapped to chairs were taken DONT you understand. PEOPLE in seats were photographed in the burning building. .Dont e-mail me back.
The left engine of the plane hit at the base of the Pentagon expansion joint, after trashing two cars in front of the Pentagon. The right engine struck at column 19, after hitting the power generator on a pad in front of the pentagon. Been documented for years. Both the Will Morris photos, and the Jason Ingersoll photos show BOTH engine impact points, wing scars, and shattered windows up to the third floor.
@Ralo13 Then show us ANY proof / facts that it was a missile. If you Google Flight 77 plane wreckage you'll see numerous photo's of a PLANE CRASH AT THE PENTAGON, just open your eyes Ralo. There's evidence right there, where's the evidence of a missile ? Oh and where are the passengers & crew of Flight 77 ? None of them ever came home or went back to work or even got their cars out of the airport parking garages, so where are these people Ralo ? Give me FACTS not your own made up bullshit.
erm, i actually saw godzilla smash into the pentagon, see its that easy to lie, anyone can hear conspiracy theories and question what they saw. i bet this man before he heard any theories, knew he saw a 757
So because this one guy thinks he saw something that contradicts the physical evidence and other witnesses, we must accept what he says and deem everything else wrong? LOL I bet I can find a witness who says Godzilla smashed into the pentagon, that would prove EVERYONE wrong! Ridiculous.
heafers84,
Obviously you didn't pay attention. We made it clear that he could not see the Pentagon but obviously he had a much better view about the approach direction of the plane from the river. This fatally contradicts all official reports and data. The witnesses to the plane north of the Citgo are who prove it did not hit the light poles or Pentagon.
lytetrip 3 months ago
Fuck that repetitious stupid ass music
mercury90hp 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 4 months ago
If you crackpots think a missile hit the Pentagon then tell me this, where are the passengers & flight crew from Flight 77 ? Did they ALL decide to take a permanent vacation together on 9 / 11 at the same time and never return back to their lives, families, jobs, etc. ? You people CAN'T be that stupid.
iwinofcourse 4 months ago
@iwinofcourse You Managed several fallacies of deception in your conclusion.Hasty Generalization due to inadequate evidence and Limited Choice by precluding options to start with.By using the appeal to ignorance with lack of validity in your hypothesis the spectrum of measurement limits you as you moved to the Red herring and it forces the premises of your inductive reasoning to become blatantly false.In the exposition provided by NIST all propositions limit strength removing deductive capacity
andyjoep 4 months ago
@andyjoep Wow Andy, we're all sooooo impressed with your eloquence and use of the English language but it didn't amount to shit because all you did is dance around my question JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE on here. Hypothesis ? No it's facts, so either answer the question or shut the fuck up. By the way, the words managed, limited, choice and generalization did not require to be capitalized shit for brains. Can you say Aduuuurrrrr ?
iwinofcourse 4 months ago
@iwinofcourse The fact you are asking the question is adequate enough to show it has not been answered and clearly not a deductive argument. You may want to call the FBI and DOJ and ask why they are investigating this matter as we speak. They are the ones who decided to do an investion because it is clear the 911 exposition by NIST is a FAIL and now they must do the right thing. Call them and find out for yourself because you look and sound like a morom right now.
andyjoep 4 months ago
@andyjoep I don't have to call anyone Andy because " normal " people know the truth, it was right there in front of us, it's people like you that want to twist and mislead people on what the truth is. Where are the passengers & crew Andy ? Did you see the " airplane " debris all over the Pentagon lawn when you Googled Flight 77 wreckage ? How about the eyewitnesses on the ground and in their cars that saw the plane ? Don't kid yourself Andy, you're still a moron.
iwinofcourse 4 months ago
@iwinofcourse OK. You are right and I am wrong.
andyjoep 4 months ago
Well actually ur the moron cause if you take all the dimensions of an aircraft as well as the sheer mass you will see that there are major holes in the official story. Any type of plane crash you see something that says...plane crash!!! Fire, smoke, debris. The only debris at the Pentagon was clean pieces of aluminum that could be picked up by hand. What about the 2 8-ton Pratt & Witney jumbo jet titanium engines? Did they evaporate?
generalmaximus53 4 months ago
@generalmaximus53 "The only debris at the Pentagon was clean pieces of aluminum that could be picked up by hand. What about the 2 8-ton Pratt & Witney jumbo jet titanium engines? Did they evaporate? "
There were several LARGE pieces of the engine, and the landing gear. The problem you morons have is that you're looking at the lawn for plane debris. It's the equivalent of car crashing through a wall and you not believing it b/c the car isn't in the parking lot!
heafers84 3 months ago
Are there any real eyewitnesses from the pentagoncrash?.
KillaBastard 7 months ago
@KillaBastard Yes several and they disprove the official story just like this witness does. Google: National Security Alert.
lytetrip 7 months ago
@lytetrip actually all eyewitneesses saw a plane crash into the pentagon. None saw anything but, several PILOTS identified it as an American Airlines 757. One guy was on the lawn. I doubt a guy, on a boat, several MILES away from the crash had a better view than a guy who was almost got hit by the plane. Eyewitnesses saw a plane crash into the pengaton, plane debris matching AA 757, DNA of passengers, FDR, and eyewitnesses who saw bodies still strapped to their seats. CASE CLOSED!!
heafers84 3 months ago
He is scripted and its too proper. Who says "Eastern Sky"? Runway? No, nobody uses the word runway, they say land. "Flight path"? "Banked in"? For how frantic 9/11 was I'm surprised how calm he is
Fillistar 8 months ago
this hillbilly doesnt know left from right nor south from north hes probably drunk
vee85 11 months ago
What was priceless, of course, was the map showing, "Bank too far to see".
It should have been labeled, "Bank that never happened".
Merlin5x5 11 months ago
Liar...no one on local news saw a plane flying steeply in to the pentagon..and again the light poles are still intact outside the pentagon on the so called "direct flight path"
frequenceez 1 year ago
@frequenceez Right, the whole area is crawling with US GOV employees. And you do not need a witness to prove a plane crashed anyways
UNTC321 11 months ago
Fishing at the sewage treatment plant? We must assume he has been doing that for some time and with some success:: He's full of shit. It's coming out everywhere!. Whatever he saw it wasn't the plane that hit. He just saw a plane, maybe
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
What a bunch of hog wash this is all a fake!! It took these douche 7 years to upload this?? Fake bullshit!!!
aburgheim 1 year ago
I don't know what you are talking about Ralo. My husband was a first responder (as well as myself)....we both picked up plane parts (as well as victims) and there was even a plane lavatory/burned seats inside the Pentagon that still had victims and body parts. Unless you know what you're talking about or were there - I would keep your crazy conspiracy theories to yourself.
ushiiceo 1 year ago
@ushiiceo Interesting. You should creat a video and/or write a book/article. Is there a source we can go to to verify your claim? Thanks!
zgreggz83 1 year ago
@zgreggz83 - yeah....you can actually visit the Old Guard unit at Fort Myer, VA. At their headquarters building, they have a display of pictures, artifacts, etc showing my husband and his unit going into the Pentagon as first responders. The soldiers of Bravo Company and Charlie Company, The Old Guard, US Army were the main first responders that were sent into the Pentagon with just their BDUs for the first week....they risked their lives and welfare to help others.
ushiiceo 1 year ago
@zgreggz83 - I feel that unless ANY of you were ACTUALLY there at the crash site, you should really keep your opinions on this tragedy to yourself. There are a lot of people, including myself and my husband, that still have to live day to day with the images we witnessed that horrific day.
ushiiceo 1 year ago
@ushiiceo I didn't present an opinion; I was asking about your experience and validation of the experience.
zgreggz83 1 year ago
@zgreggz83 - I apologize to you then zgreggz83.....you were just asking....sorry about beating up on you....it's an emotional topic and some other people on this page have been quite negative.
ushiiceo 1 year ago
@ushiiceo Why don't you get angry at the real perps. of 911, that would be the pentagon and whitehouse.
UNTC321 11 months ago
@ushiiceo AMEN. I know quite a few first responders that were there. and there were a lot of debris
sforcesrcg 1 year ago
@ushiiceo I cant believe all these people who STILL think it was a missile,ive been fighting them for months. Im SO glad you guys are here to help. Thanks so much for your part being there and being here.
gladheateher4now 11 months ago
flight 77 wasn't the only plane in the air , there was a C130 too
and : this guy didnt witness the Pentagon attack !
hollandshoop 1 year ago
whats the name of the last tune?
sussex113 1 year ago
christopher bollyn's book enlightens many on 9 11. read it today!
eckyspondoolie 1 year ago
new world order
Tackleqb 1 year ago
@Tackleqb
Far more likely, New American stupidity.
Bubba here, standing in his boat, on the wrong side of the Pentagon,
suddenly gets his 5 minutes of fame claiming he was a witness to
the attack on the WEST side of the Pentagon, about 8 miles from his
location. It could happen, right after the flying pigs fleet goes across
the sky.
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
LIsten, there was no wreckage. Look at the pentagram before the upper rim collapsed. That's all any intelligent person needs to see that a 757 did not crash there. Just like the newsman said, No sign of an airliner hitting anywhere near the pentagon. The plane couldn't fit into the hole. The wings, the seats, bodies, engines, tailsection would have made impact damage. The tail section, wings and engines would have messed up the side of the building. It didn't. LIERS
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
Either his brain has been fried from eating those filthy fish or he has been paid well. Has he upgraded his boat or bought a holiday home since 9/11??
TheAstroflight 1 year ago
Fishing at the sewage treatment plant???
What leads anyone to believe that this guy is genuine? So one guy renders the black box AND radar paths false? The guy was probably drunk and doesn't even know what he saw
CrazyRay7979 2 years ago
6:44 "To me it looked like just a commercial airliner. Didn't look like anything else. Just looked like a normal commercial airliner that was, the kind we see land and take off every 3, 3/12 minutes here out on the water."
Nice try jhouse770. You either didn't watch the video very carefully or you're just a liar trying to confuse people about this smoking gun proof that the NTSB released fraudulent radar data.
There's a lot more interviews at CitizenInvestigationTeam . com proving deception
StandUpForLiberty 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 inside job !!!
nickowce 2 years ago
If he could see the plane so well, why didn't he describe it? Was it an airliner? A C130? What color was it? He NEVER says...
jhouse770 2 years ago
At 6:50 he says it looked like a "normal commercial airliner" that he sees every 3+ mins there on the water. Then it is repeated again @ 6:55. LOL, did you not watch the whole thing? or just not very observant :)
luvmyctd 2 years ago
Actually he does. Watch it again.
MercBezerk 2 years ago
OK, both of you dumb asses. If it was a plane that hit the pentagon there would be debris from it. And before you try to leave a comment saying it burned up, the engines would definitely be there. Fuel under combustion in a jet engine burns way hotter than it does just spilled out on the ground. So know your facts you illiterate retards, and take something from someone who's actually got a fricken clue about anything. Thanks for your time.
JCwarfighter 2 years ago 2
This is a 4 month old comment that I'm replying to, but well... there was debris. Including human debris, if you must know. Try to read both sides of an argument before you attack the other side.
Google '9/11 popular mechanics' to read a report involving 300 scientific experts and eyewitnesses. That should be compelling evidence to any intelligent person.
LukeShetler 2 years ago
@LukeShetler Debris? There wasn't even the smell of jet fuel. Just the smell of cordite. Explain that. After you get your head out of your ass.
LordBalto 1 year ago
@LordBalto I suppose you know this using your smell-o-scope, lol. Any random scumbag could lie about what it supposedly smelled like. Skepticism is your friend.
LukeShetler 1 year ago
@LordBalto
Well, idiot, what does cordite smell like?
It's NOT fireworks, it's cordite, a mixture of LOW GRADE
propellants that hasn't been used since WW2, and
NEVER produced for American Arms. Last time I
Looked, it wasn't even being PRODUCED anywhere.
wiki pedia. org / wiki / Cordite
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
ok sense it was a missle where's this plane that fired the missle , who was the pilot?? hmmm weird ..
nigletgook 2 years ago
This is stupid
I used to live in the area, and I'm pretty familiar with the river as well. Given that he was so far south, I doubt that he could have distinguished between a plane an a (much closer) bird. That's a long way .....
andharvey8 2 years ago
Did you see that bird at 3:20! Oh damn, that was a weird looking bird.
gtg309v 2 years ago
LOL, right on:) How could anybody distinguish between a bird or a 90 ton airliner. Must be some big birds on that river beside the waste treatment plant ! lol
Some people eh :)
luvmyctd 2 years ago 6
what did you say? I was drinking my flor-ide enriched orange kool-aid.
AlexJonesWebovision 2 years ago
weither it was a missle or a plane it doesnt matter.. the pentagon is supposed to be the most secure building in the world. it has cameras all along the edge of the roof.. yet the only thing they released was ONE picture of a fireball.. and teh picture was dated 9/12..... so there is obviously something fishy to it all... weither it was a plane or not.
natruto 2 years ago
where are all these security cameras you claim were all along the edge of the roof at the Pentagon? I think you have been listening to to many conspiracy theorists! Show us all these cameras you say were there! And now your saying the crash video was taken on 9/12? you conspiracy theorist are reaching deep!
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
you mean to tell me, you think there are more cameras in a Wal Mart, than at the Pentagon?
only 2 vids from the pentagon were released. Mostly from the same angle.
Wal Mart has them in the parking lot, in the aisle, store front etc...
siti1ca 2 years ago 2
LOL @ anyone thinking that security cameras are supposed to film the sky
CrazyRay7979 2 years ago
Nobody asks the important questions. Why did the so-called terrorist make that loop before he struck the pentagon?
Amerikkkasuks 2 years ago
@Amerikkkasuks Ummm because he came in too high and had to lose altitude. This is a question that has been asked and answered.
LordDavidVader 1 year ago
yea this is some new shit.. this is kinda stupid.. wasn't there also a mistery plane that was seen after the explosion fllying near the white house.. maybe that is the plane he saw
johnmady7 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Google this Mark humprey 911 actor from iron eagle 2 google Bertha champagne Google earth flight 93 crash site same hole no plane last youtube building 7 and type in 5 dancing israelies and know u been had go back 2 sleep
WakeUpZombies74 3 years ago
Not sure what this video is trying to prove. Isn't the whole conspiracy theory about the Pentagon that it was hit by a missle?
jeffmay1 3 years ago
i have the same question
captaincadavor 3 years ago
Also, you do know that the plane that hit the Pentagon took off from Dulles airport out in Va., not Reagan National. You do understand that, right? Why don't you have any info on
DULLES in your little cockeyed maps?
gripper61 3 years ago
I thought I saw Elvis in Chattanooga recently. Does that mean he's alive?
gripper61 3 years ago
That is evidence that he might be alive, yes.
kaje01 2 years ago
so no missile, yet fraudulent black box reports
ak47523 3 years ago
Dude, you do fishing trips to the sewage treatment plant? Umm, count me in!
BMayhew60 3 years ago 2
A flyover conspiracy? LMAO.
Furbilicious2x1400 3 years ago
Plains fly into buildings plain drop bombs onto buildings. This does not bring anything new to the story. What kind of plain was it???
unamendable 3 years ago
He Seen A Plane Right? Yet There Is No Evidence Of A Plane Crashing In The Pentagon. No Wing, No Egine, No Seats, Literally Nothing. Look Up "Only Aired Once About Pentagon". And Pentagon Conspiracy. There Was No Plane. It Was A Missle.
Ralo13 3 years ago 6
@Ralo13 correct! They did the Operation Northwood on us. lol
marcusjansen239369 1 year ago
@Ralo13 a misile,your an idiot/ where did all those people go that died in the plane. How about the 5 light posts that were knocked over/they were 45 feet apart. You show me a missile with a 50 ft wingspan . Go back to your comic book
gladheateher4now 1 year ago
@gladheateher4now Light poles were a simple parlor trick, who care about the people, you can not account for the hole in the wall. Therefore NO PLANE crashed into the pentagon. Did you see Building 7? Don't be stupid.
UNTC321 11 months ago
@UNTC321 ARE you for real ? Parlor tricks? So a group of 10 guys knocked over the light poles before a missile hit? People like you make be sick. There are photos of people still in there seats burning in that wreckage bud/people have seen those. So before you comment,do some homework. so if it was a missile. Tell me how a hole in the wall might occure. You ever thought of some part of that plane like wheels or one of the engines causing that hole/ my god people are stupid
gladheateher4now 11 months ago
@gladheateher4now There is one hole only. There are two engines on a plane. you are a complete fool. Look at the wall before it collapsed.
UNTC321 11 months ago
@UNTC321 no your the fool / engines fall off as they crash and so do plane tires you idiot. What part of photos of people strapped to chairs were taken DONT you understand. PEOPLE in seats were photographed in the burning building. .Dont e-mail me back.
gladheateher4now 11 months ago
@UNTC321
The left engine of the plane hit at the base of the Pentagon expansion joint, after trashing two cars in front of the Pentagon. The right engine struck at column 19, after hitting the power generator on a pad in front of the pentagon. Been documented for years. Both the Will Morris photos, and the Jason Ingersoll photos show BOTH engine impact points, wing scars, and shattered windows up to the third floor.
You lose again, LOL.
Merlin5x5 11 months ago
@Ralo13 Then show us ANY proof / facts that it was a missile. If you Google Flight 77 plane wreckage you'll see numerous photo's of a PLANE CRASH AT THE PENTAGON, just open your eyes Ralo. There's evidence right there, where's the evidence of a missile ? Oh and where are the passengers & crew of Flight 77 ? None of them ever came home or went back to work or even got their cars out of the airport parking garages, so where are these people Ralo ? Give me FACTS not your own made up bullshit.
iwinofcourse 4 months ago
@Ralo13 if u look at their other vids u can see that they say the plane DIDNT hit it
drifter402 4 months ago
He should have asked what time it was when he saw the plane!
fr44ed 3 years ago
"I bet I can find a witness who says Godzilla smashed into the pentagon, that would prove EVERYONE wrong! Ridiculous."
I bet you cant, you stupid fuck.
You're justplainwrong.
WillfullyIgnorant 3 years ago
erm, i actually saw godzilla smash into the pentagon, see its that easy to lie, anyone can hear conspiracy theories and question what they saw. i bet this man before he heard any theories, knew he saw a 757
skatanicskanker 3 years ago 2
The point is just because someone says they saw something doesn't mean that we assume they were right and everyone else is wrong.
Willfully ignorant ....how appropriate :)
justplainwrong 3 years ago
So because this one guy thinks he saw something that contradicts the physical evidence and other witnesses, we must accept what he says and deem everything else wrong? LOL I bet I can find a witness who says Godzilla smashed into the pentagon, that would prove EVERYONE wrong! Ridiculous.
justplainwrong 3 years ago
So because this one guy thinks he saw something that contradicts the physical evidence
---------
It does not contradict the physical evidence!
What witnesses is he contradicting...none that I know of!
Good handle for you just plain wrong
fr44ed 3 years ago
The FDR data is physical evidence. In reality, the subjective claims of a single eyewitness do not invalidate scientific data.
justplainwrong 3 years ago
straw man alert.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
What a great report. Better than any corporate news reporting has ever done. Bravo Patriots
greenback001 3 years ago 2
Well done. So, when do we put some people in jail?
Bittermanscolon 3 years ago
As soon as they relinquish control of everything!
fr44ed 3 years ago