I'll say a prayer for all of you who posted. Looks like there is a lot of hatred. If you really want to find the right mate -just say a simple prayer. Ask Jesus to help you find the right person. I was an atheist once but today I don't worry about nothing.
A "family" is by definition a m, a woman and a child. I'm in a family and we're really happy. But I agree with this video - at least to say that things are really screwed up nowadays.
This video I totally agree with "NO MARRIAGES !!" Did it once, will never do it again,biggest mistake I ever made by getting married and having children. Stay single and don't get involved with the opposite sex or have any children with them.
If marriage is obsolete, what do you propose as the alternative way to raise children? I certainly would not want any of my children raised by a single parent, nor would I wish to inflict upon them the uncertainty of cohabitation with their mother, always leaving open the possibility that their father could just one day decide not to come home.
So, are you saying that a child without a father is a bad thing? If so, what about all the psychology research that has proven otherwise? I just went through a difficult Infancy & Childhood psych developmental class and learned this. Lesbians actually produce the most well-adjusted children apparently.
@TheHappyMisogynist Here are the names of the research, so you can educate yourself: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted); "Reframing the power of lesbian daughters’ relationships with mothers through Black feminist thought"; "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
You need to give authors with studies. And when you do I will send you the ones that I have citing the increased incidence of domestic violence in lesbian homes. And it is not that I have anything against lesbians, just stupid lesbians that don't understand research.
@TheHappyMisogynist I would link them to you, but youtube won't allow me to. And those are the names of the published studies, all you have to do is copy and paste them into Google.
I am a psychology major and I have yet to see any research supporting any of your wild claims. As long as a child has a responsive, secure, warm caregiver, that is all they need, regardless of gender. My friend did her undergrad study on lesbian parenting. I'd like to see the research you claim to have.
@WrathoftheGoddess (part 2) Do you research only those so-called "studies" which tend to support your view, or do you also research those that contradict it? Also, Is this a common view held by all lesbians. I thank my dear father for being in my life and teach me to be the man that I am today. I don't have any problem with gays and lesbians and their life-style, but I do have problem when they try to develop and foster dangerous ideology and philosophy that attent to make fatherhood obsolete.
@pedrom41 The finding of your so-called research doesn't suggest that all those single moms raising kids by themselves should all turn into lesbians--does it? Or that the solution to the high rate of African-American males incarceration is for the whole community to turn into gays and lesbians. That's not what the research suggests--does it?
@pedrom41 The fact is that there is no legitimate research that shows ANY correlation between gay/lesbian parenting and negative affects on children. "Develop and foster dangerous ideology and philosophy"? Do you realize how ludicrous that sounds? Fatherhood is not necessary for a child's healthy development, and neither is motherhood. A supportive, healthy, and loving caregiver is all that is necessary- regardless if they are man, woman, transsexual, or intersexual.
@WrathoftheGoddess And there's no research--worth its name--that support your claim either. Only partisan so-called "research." Your claim is that you found some "research" that suggests that children may be better off with two lesbians. Talking about "ludicrous' sound! Should we encourage every single mother who are struggling to raise their kids without father (specially boys) to turn lesbians? It's that the most plausible solution to that problem? That sounds more like an agenda to me.(cont)
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.) New study conducted by two University of Southern California sociologists, writing in recent issue of the "America Sociological Review," found that children with lesbian or gay parents are "more likely to show more empathy for social diversity"--here you may call this an advantage. But the study also shows that the "kids themselves are probably more likely to explore homosexual activities themselves." Is this what you call "WELL-ADJUSTED CHILDREN"? ......(cont.)
@WrathoftheGoddess Oh yeah, let's kick all the fathers out of the home and replace them with gays and lesbians. EURIKA, what a brilliant idea!!! Certainly there are differences between children raised by mother and father and those raised by two lesbians or two gays. But are these differences healthy? And is that 100% guaranteed? There's not even guarantee that the lesbian-lesbian relationship will work any more or any better than a heterosexual relationship. Moreover, the study shows...(cont.)
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.)....that "lesbian mother tend to have a feminizing effect on their sons, and masculinizing effect on their daughters. The best that could be said of the findings is that "no significant differences between children of lesbian and heterosexual parents in anxiety, depression, self-esteem and numerous other measures of social and psychological adjustment were found." (Said the researchers).....(cont.)
@WrathoftheGoddess You seem motivated to rely only upon bipartisan information that tend to support your own world view, and purposely ignoring relevant information that challenges it. In fact, have you challenged those informations you touted, or you just simply accepted it at face value? Here some links you can check if you will: "A Michigan Family Forum Resources," PhD. Warren Farrell's "Three Judicial Biases About Moms, Dads and Children."
@pedrom41 I actually don't "ignore relevant information", I'm a psychology major so we are required to expose ourselves to all the scholarly research. This is simply what I have found. Do you really believe that a father is necessary to a child's well-being? If you do, do you apply this to motherhood as well? If you believe that a mother is not necessary, but a father is, then that is pure sexist. I appreciate the links and I will check them out, thank you.
@pedrom41 Ok, I read your link and while some of Farrell's claims are made from correlational studies, which should never be done in the field of science, he makes some very good points that I already knew of. Every feminist knows that men are also hurt by patriarchy- it is traditional gender roles that men are simply the bread-winners and women are the nurturers. This is the premise of child custody cases and this sexism prevents fathers from getting paternal leave (which they are entitled to)
@pedrom41 Did you know that in Warren Farrell's book, "Why Men Earn More Than Women", in the introduction he states, "Since 1974, feminist attorneys have been urging parental leave, rather than maternity leave, for clients. We know that what brings equality to women also brings equality to men." He even expressed his support for NOW in that book. See? Even this guy understands that feminism is doing good for men as well. :D
@WrathoftheGoddess You've been very selective of the things you want to respond to from everything so far I've said. Oh yeah, feminism is doing good for men as well. Gender theorist Adrienne Rich in her book "Of A Woman Born" claims that "all men--past, present, anf future are all rapist and exploiter of women." Kate Millett called for "the end of the family unit." Catharine MacKinnon declared that "marriage, rape, and prostitution are indistingushible from each other." (cont.)
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.)....and our legal system--under feminists preasure--seems to be massaging fanaticism into the frame work of what it terms "jurisprudence." Consistent with the principles of classical liberalism, the Equal Protection Clause under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution says: "No state shall deny any [person] within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Feminist Jurisprudence, however, determines what level of protection an individual deserves...(cont.)
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.)......based on their classification of race, sex, and so forth. Influential radical feminist--Susan Caringella, who in 2008 published her book "Addressing Rape Reform In Law and Practice"--cites in her book MacKinnon's premises which argues for legal reforms which includes "reversing the presumption of innocent in rape trials" (pages 169-83) She and other influential feminists argue that "false rape allegations are a myth." You tell me how is this "good for men."
@pedrom41 Susan Caringella does not have much evidence to back up her claims. At the most, she can conclude that false rape allegations are rare, which the FBI has confirmed with their 1% statistic. I would strongly encourage you to think critically about how feminism has helped men as well. Most of my friends are men and they are feminists because they've studied and looked into it. It's not always obvious on the surface, but when you look deeper you can see how it's made life better for men.
@WrathoftheGoddess "Susan Caringella does not have much evidence to.......rape allegations are rare, which the FBI....." "Most of my friends are men and they are feminists......" Up to this point I was taking you seriously, but it has become crystal clear that there's no good reason to keep this dialogue with you. Since you "strongly encourage you (me) to think critically about how feminism......." I would also strongly suggest that you read "Who Stole Feminsm" and......(cont. on 2)
@WrathoftheGoddess (part 2) "The War Against Boys" by scholar and Equity Feminist Christina Hoff Sommers. Unfortunatelly, many--if not most--conservative feminists scholars (both male and female) have been effectively marginalized and/or rendered invisible on most cam puses throughout the United States.
@TheHappyMisogynist See the issue is that all these groups say such and such individuals make the best parents etc. Instead what we need to know is what actual qualities make for the best parents? What qualities must a parent have to give the best possible guide and support for a child?
@WrathoftheGoddess In the African-American community more than 50% of boys are raised by single mother household--very little or no father (for a variety of reasons) involvement. Is just pure coincidence that more than have of the prison population happen to be black men? That wouldn't have anything to do with those boys growing up fatherless--would it? "Lesbians actually produce the most well-adjusted children apparently." (Cont. on part 2)
@WrathoftheGoddess Those are books that have been written by feminists. Go to any prison and see. 95% of the inmates in prison are from fatherless homes, over 70% of suicides are committed by kids from fatherless homes, 80% of school dropouts are from fatherless homes. Am not saying that kids from fatherless homes don't succeed but the ones who succeed are the minority e.g. Obama
@wamnicho you know those statistics when it says fatherless homes, feminists use against men more for running away and blaming the end result on them.
I have NEVER met a well adjusted man who was raised by a single woman. And EVERYTHING I have heard from associates and professionals is in line with my own observations.
Oh "non-sexist" is an important metric by your sources? Yeah, I think that explains it. Most I've know have been incompetent with women. I'm talking virgins in their mid 20s, some of them.
I had to climb my way out a real fucked up headspace about women, and when I finally did, I found I had lost interest.
So, yeah, if you want psychologically castrated virgins and faggots, single mothering is the way to go.
I'm not complaining - look at the minefield I avoided. Boyfriends don't fuck you over with the legal system, they duke it out like men or they throw a bitch-fit for a few minutes. The worst a guy is likely to do is not tell you he's got the HIV. There's no AZT to reduce jail sentences or child support payments.
@IvanWanko I never said there was a study showing that lesbians raped by men make better parents..... Just that plenty of studies show that lesbians in general make just as good parents as gays.
@WrathoftheGoddess Do you have any actual evidence? Or are you just like every other feminist I have ever conversed with, an irrational, childish, lying, moron? Though, from your previous comments I don't think I have to ask that question.
@IvanWanko Well, if you want to determine who is childish and irrational, you could look back over your own comment and note the many unnecessary insults you have flung at me. Here are some: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted); "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
@IvanWanko I tend to think irrationality and childishness look like flinging around insults at people you know nothing about, like what you just did. Here: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted); "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
@IvanWanko I tend to think irrationality and childishness look like flinging around insults at people you know nothing about, like what you just did. Here: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted), "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
@WrathoftheGoddess The study you cite has been thrown out of numerous courtrooms and ridiculed in the academic communities. It compares hetro single mothers to lesbian single mothers, neither of which are exactly grade-a child raising formulas. The real statistical evidence is for a one man one woman permanent union rearing biological offspring.
No credible study has ever found that gay or single parents can come close to straight pairs.
@nofalltoofar I have never heard of it being "thrown out" of courtrooms and academic communities as it was an academic site I got it from.
That is SO not true, and you are being homophobic. The truth is that it matters not the gender, sexual orientation, race, etc. of a parent, but their ability to parent and caregive.
It's hypocritical that these "Men's rights" activists claim that men make better parents. Why? For having a penis? Sounds sexist to me.
@WrathoftheGoddess There was a show done somewhat recently by the BBC called The Biology of Dads that proves with both psychological and scientific research that it is a bad thing and children do need fathers. In fact science has even discovered that girls who don't have fathers go into puberty at an accelerated rate. So that they look older than girls who have fathers during adolescence as a biological adaption in order to find a male for protection in absence of protection from a father.
@WrathoftheGoddess You are so full of shit. The directionless, underachieving and unsure children of the 70s, 80s and 90s are called "the fatherless generation." Now there are insecure, self-serving and illogical Gen Yers that are the bane of teachers, intractable and unable to hold attention span since daddy never taught them since mommy kicked him away. And you learned something in a female, doctrine dominated university? Big surprise! Break the family up and Marxism succeeds. Psych is dogma.
I love how most male rights activists always end up being anti-gay marriage (original poster excluded). What, so you'll fight for men's rights, but only straight men's rights? What goddamn hypocrites.
You must not keep up very much. The great majority of MRA's don't have any investment in marriage at all, much less gay marriage. Most all of us are against marriage period,
@TheHappyMisogynist My comment was actually referring to a few of the other commentators' posts who appeared to still be in favor of marriage so long as it wasn't gay. However, I couldn't hyperlink all of them, so I just left a general comment. I'm very well aware of what your view on marriage is, hence why I said "original poster excluded."
@redgirlinbluedresses What exactly did he say that was anti-gay? Did you even listen to what he said? He spent the entire video bashing those who opposed gay marriage and the rest simply criticizing the institution of marriage as a whole. Please quote exactly what he said in this video that was anti gay, please be specific.
As a Man i agree with some of what you were saying but just because somthing is sick doesnt mean it cant get better remember as a Man you dont have to be a Liberal nore do you have to be Unchristian you can FOLLOW what the Bible Says about Jesus being Liberating to Women without them being Femanists while you dont have to support the gay agenda at the same time Marriage is NOT THE PROBLEM Unchristian Marriage is Its a Christian Covanant men dont need women women dont need men
As a devout Atheist it might feel a tad hypocritical following the Bible. And besides, I'd rather not follow the example of a lot of good Christian men who found that Jesus couldn't find his way into the family court with them. Those guys end up axed all the time, so don't try to kid me.
The feminists have not won this, and marriage is not dead. If we want to preserve the freedom that women really want, then marriage is the best option. Just because some people have a problem living up to high standards doesn't mean we jettison the standards. Nor does it mean we get to redefine them as homosexuals want. The issue is Men's Rights, and we must insist on them if marriage is to work at all, which are good foundations for families. Call it theocracy if you want.
@MikeTMerciless cont...The problem with marriage really is the fact that it's been politicized. Get government out of marriage. Conservatives want that, ultimately. But I guarantee you homosexual activists and feminists do not want this, neither do leftists. Doing so takes the ultimate goal of both government and all of their allies off the table, which is control, and the ultimate elimination of the family as a institution for men.
All of the commentary from both these political demagogues and yourself alike have no real relevance to life as I've observed it thus far, in the rural area I'm from. I don't mean rural as in out in the middle of a ghost town, or a trailer court, but generally well to do areas in the Midwest. Sometimes I'm glad that I come from a pastoral area where such useless issues have no effect on me.
@neuraxianfusion the problem I have with rural areas is that there are lots of religious quacks and conspiracy theorists, but the women can be better out here
@SeeProfileForDetails I think that aspect of rural areas is far overplayed. Perhaps I live in a unique anomaly in America, but most people here spend their time doing things that I think any American, or maybe even any human being would be loathe to deprecate. Those things being volunteering for the community, attending community events, spending quiet evenings with their family, and attending to various personal projects such as gardening and home improvement.
@neuraxianfusion I think it is far underplayed. I just moved to a rural area a few years ago, and there are alcoholics who drink and drive because they aren't skeptical, they have wives that are into conspiracies and alex jones, along with churches everywhere. That being said, the country life is nice and there are genuinely friendly people, even the alcoholics.
@SeeProfileForDetails Well given that my observation was just that, an observation, and is contrary to a popular generalization propagated mostly to bolster the ego of urban dwellers, I'm going to assume that your belief that the religious and alcoholic aspects of rural life are underplayed is more based in ideology than reality.
@neuraxianfusion Why would it be based on ideology? Just go to the small town websites and look at the events section... A.A. meetings, Church announcements, Evangelist organizations, have you actually done any research on small town living or do you just pretend that small towns are liberal atheist communities? that being said, and even personally seeing people guzzling beer down before they drive with their eyes glazed over, the people are genuinely friendly - just stupid.
@SeeProfileForDetails You obviously are ideologically motivated, because most liberal atheist communities I've been too, i.e. larger cities on the coast, are absolutely terrible places to live. Also, everything you claim happens in a small town, the sort of environment I was raised in and thus have more experience than you with, has not happened in the area I live at all. Where as you have obvious motivations to promote liberalism and atheism, I only have observation.
@neuraxianfusion You obviously are basing everything purely on assumptions. I'm not a liberal, nor an atheist. I'm a agnostic and I do not vote, but libertarianism looks good. The city is also full of drunks too, but these drunks often can take a taxi home, whereas a farmer cannot, and therefore the acreage and farmer people are putting people's lives at risk.
The government has not business regulating marriage. Marriage should be governed under contract law. And those contracts should be enforced with the same objectivity as any other kind of contract.
Those who breach the contract should not profit from that breach.
Im a conservative but im liberal on the ideal of gay marriage. i think marriage is a joke, especially when the divorce rate is more than 50%. if gays wants to get married, let them. it is their "pursuit of happiness" and we should do things that make us happy so long as we don't hurt anyone. And about those people who argue for the sanctity of marriage, they are cheaters themselves (Senator John Ensign, anyboby?)
Men just see the results of the mis-implementation of legislation in courts that men are allowing to go on. There is no such thing as unilateral no-fault divorce. What happens when you read the legislation is that the Husband is ambushed into taking part and the court presumes that he also wants a divorce. Any thing else would be un-Constitutional.
We conducted a survey. 96% (really) said they wanted to get married. Why shouldn't they. What has Elam to offer instead homosexuality, prostitutes?
Why is it that so-called men's rights activists, like this ranter Elam, all turn out if you give them enough time to be feminists. The number one goal of feminism has always been to eradicate the Family founded on Marriage simply because the Family has rights superior to the State and all feminists are Marxists. By definition Elam is a feminist and a 5th columnist.
The acid test is ask these wannabe destroyers of Marriage have they ever read a single word of legislation on Marriage. They haven't
I wonder how the family courts would react to a gay couple with adopted kids splitting up - which side would they automatically support and what side would they demonize!
Good vid. I never thought men's rights was a political thing anyway. However I do see how some men would put politics in it or make it political. Wrong thing to do.
Marriage is a CHANCE, u could have children & live happily ever after. If a man want's children, what other CHANCE does he have. To have a child with a women u would not otherwise be willing to marry puts you at the mercy of a woman, u would not be willing to marry. Even the women u might have a chance with, would also, in the end, subcum to the societal pressure of using the child against u as sperm donor. My biggest fear is having children that I am nothing more then a $ check too.
@ORVX my question below/above is real, im 38 and not married for a reason but I still think I'd like to have children, I don't see it being a happy life if I can't pull the hat trick and get luck with a women for ever. Sure I know if I marry and it falls apart im screwd, but if I want children how do I have any other GOOD choice?
marriage is a new age shell trick nowadays and as the author asserts a spent institution and a mere trap for mooney eyed male fools
that "is "right !! the guy marries the state hahahahhh feminit marriage laws are tomes of trip wires leading to truncation of butthead by the feminit judiciary for the benefit of his ex wife to be
his kids his assets and a living wage/ salary mere memories
Why do feminists question the works of women who don't agree with them. They are their fellow women, so why do they fought them. (yes I'm being stupid for my reasons.)
I'm not sure if you can blame feminists for divorce rates - divorce isn't necessarily a bad thing, as long as one party isn't going to eat up all the other's money.
I think religion, not feminism destroyed marriage. You seem to think that women are solely to blame for all societies problems. If that's not true please clarify because that's the overwhelming sense I'm getting from these videos.
I feel that way because in all these videos all he does is say feminists are wrong and stupid and men are so oppressed and life is so hard for them because of women and so on. And he doesn't recognise that men have any faults at all.
I don't believe in religion or marriage and I think society would be better off without them anyway. Religion destroys what a mating partnership should be- love and natural equality.
Wow, that comment was very condescending. Everyone who doesn't agree with you or questions what you say is unintelligent. What I don't understand is why you're insulting me when I never did that to you. Would you mind telling me?
Sorry, I didn't even see this till matriarch commented to defend you. It is actually just a matter of time. Anyone who thoughtfully reviews my work doesn't conclude that could not conclude that I think women are to blame for societies ills. It is just a reaction typical for people who cannot comprehend the idea that women can be held to account for anything at all. So no, women are not the source of all our ills. The problem is bigger than that. It is a system, CONTINUED..
with male and female participation, that colludes to make men culpable for everything while exonerating women. And I do maintain that anyone who puts some intelligence into evaluating my words sees that.
I am very busy at what I do, so I don't bother with taking everyones hand and walking them through this. Not everyone was born to get it.
Oh my, you have surely put me in my place. Just imagine the dose of humility I now feel from the awesome power of your words.
But, on somewhat more serious note, trying to shame an MRA over whether he could satisfy a woman is a waste of time. You should save it for those who invest their self esteem in the approval of children.
@matriarchymetic lol, you sound like fun a gal, goo look at my other comment, then understand you have really made me understand what he is saying and feel 2nd guess my sanity in even having that question.
@matriarchymetic which ever one you want loser, it don't matter, I did not go back to read what you said, since I posted a few weeks ago, all I remember is you a bitter wowmen, in the end it is what it is, we both now you are homley women that is up set that even though your whinning and ranting has produced signifigant advatnages for women, good looking women still rule the day.
Human beings are generally educable with few exceptions. You leap instead of attempting to engage my point. If you can not argue, debate my point, a point that is your trouble.
@matriarchymetic you flap lips well speak no word, hahahha c I can be profound and clever also, lol, how many times have you used that one. trust me, you look like a boob, stop it!
I don't blame feminism for are society's problems although feminists didn't help and don't seem to be try or want to fix this problems expect the ones that are for women. I think the real problem in are society is lack of education or the ignorant who choose to be argent to how laws affect them and those who believe nearly anything their told because it sounds good. And don't question anything they just believe. That one I can see with western society.
Agreed. They are developing a birth control pill for men. It will free them from the trap of paternity fraud, but doesn't much bode well for humanity in the end.
But then again, when women lose their hegemony over men, they might actually wake up.
The feminist movement was a legal accusation for equality.
I think you have swallowed the media spin of what feminism is or was, you can't pick and choose which sources you wish to listen to and then espouse this notion that they are saying nothing at all.
Read the work of feminist, quote them directly and then you can have an engaged debate and not this sounded rationale when in fact it is blatant misreading.
I don't give a flying fuck what gays think about this video. I am not here to try to get pats on the head from them. My dialogue is with Men's Rights Activists.
Great video Paul, I agree with most of your points. About those patriarchs you mention, the strange thing about many of these men (who claim to be MRA's), is that they practically seem to be encouraging a return to a time when only wealthy property owners had any rights and most men were virtual slaves, being worked to death for almost no money and if you complained, your own local police force would show up to beat some sense into you! How is this guilded age mentality good for men?
He has married 12 hookers in the past 9 years. Hilarious.
What's left of marriage? A legal contract saying you love each other...To me. That is bullshit. I do not need a ring, nor do I need a contract or a Priest to unite me with a man.
awesome video man you covered a lot of topics and hit the nail on the head each and every last one of them, Especially the patriarchs and MRA's bit, Which is something I've been reluctant to talk about, But am thankful someone has.
Well said, Paul! Gay marriage is just a red herring to distract the public from what's really wrong with marriage today. It's a smokescreen to conceal issues like the 50% divorce rate, child custody, child support, paternity fraud & false accusations of rape & domestic violence. Instead of legalizing gay marriage, I propose we do away with marriage, period. If 2 or more people (of same or opposite genders) want to live together, fine; they don't need a worthless piece of paper to formalize it!
Since when were kings sent off to die for their subjects? Since when were lords sent out to work in the fields for their serfs? It does beg the question where all this supposed power over women was.
Also many others make a hysterical analogy using the holocaust, but I cant see why?
I must have missed the jews on the lifeboat before nazis policy.
jenazee Women have NEVER been oppressed; the opposite they have been protected from the hardship that was the essence of life 99% of history. Only point you have made is that ALL people were subjected to control of a few families for 99.99% of humanity; a point feminist like to ignore when engadged in revisionist history as to how men, always the oppressors, in reality they nothing more then victims, just like ever one else. Victims that took the blunt of hammer while protecting the family.
Gratuitous holocaust reference aside, you, like most of the culture, have bought into the myth of women's oppression. Never happened. Not even close. If anything, the rules of conduct regarding women left them being treated not as slaves, but as royalty.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I say get rid of the shit all together....along with researching ways to spot homosexuality before birth so they can be aborted. Homos are a genetic defect just like people who fall to the mass delusion called religion
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sure if its found that mass delusion can't be cured which it can't so yes... Research a trait found in all who fall to mass delusion and abort them too... then after generations of that happening the world can move on with no worry of bullshit like whats happening today
im agnostic, but can see how ridicules a guy like Supernova is, he hates Beaver Cleaver, not god.MOST scientist believe in a higher power, it is simply how u define. Guys like Supernova do great harm to furtherance of science. What is worse is that an atheist, right or wrong is doing the same thing as fundamentalist. They profess 100% certainty about what they can't know. Religion is what some bad people have used to do bad things, just like guns dont kill people, people kill people with guns.
...And tell us, Supernova, just "where" do we spot this "before birth genetic defect"? Which gene or set of genes indicate non-straight sexual persuasion? Anyone who honestly & objectively reviews all of the various data without concern for supporting a particular agenda will realize that the whole "born that way" mantra is mostly a myth: a desperate bogus claim intended to attribute non-straight sexuality to some "phantom" condition rather than to personal choice or psychological issues.
why does homosexuality happens in animals? i mean, i'm straight and i don't really like all the gay rights stuff - more the way they go about it than what they want, but i'm curious about that.
@delysh: in an upcoming chapter of my ongoing playlist series on the topic of homosexual rights, I will be addressing that phenomenon & correcting a major misconception about what is really going on in so-called "animal homosexuality" and spotlighting a key principle about it which almost completely goes overlooked. In brief, there are some important things about the phenomenon that glbt supporters & defenders are trying to keep hidden or obscured which I intend to expose in the next few weeks.
look, i don't support marriage for homosexuals. i believe marriage is a religious institution and the state should be taken out of it. but homosexuality is natural according to science.
@delysh: Despite my religious philosophy, I believe marriage is less a religious institution than a societal one. I understand secular government's investment in 'regulating' it, but laws are so terribly slanted pro-female/anti-male I'd rather it detached itself altogether & allow individual couples to mutually set their own committment guidelines, then homo-marriage wouldn't be an issue. Re: the supposed "science" of homosexuality, I still encourage you to follow my ongoing series for insight.
1) Homosexuals are not 'genetic defects'. Care to back up your claim by siting which alleles cause homosexuality, as well as it being a defective mutation; and, from which chromosome?
2) Religious people are not a genetic defect; and, nor is religion a 'mass delusion'. How are they out of touch? Are you all-knowing enough to say, who is sane or not?
3) As far as abortion goes: abort the aborters, save the babies!
Agreed with point one, As for point 3, I don't have a problem with abortion and do not subscribe to pro-life rhetoric, There is something called the male abortion, If you haven't already look that up.
Is challenging the view that religious people suffer from a genetic disorder, defending religion or defending people from unwarranted claims? I take issue with such claims; because, they are unfounded slander. If someone is going to claim that there exists a genetic defect, I want to see the research as to which alleles are causing it. In this incident, there is no evidence yet provided; it is just meant to insult religious people, for no reason other than to be abrasive.
As for abortion, I detest people telling me that someone has a right to kill my children- especially since that 'right' to commit infanticide is only conferred on the basis of gender. How sexist! How callous and foul!
Well that is unfortunate but there is nothing we can do about that, Until the arrival of an artificial womb, Then we can do something. Did you look at the male abortion? that's fixing one problem, I acknowledge we still have a long way to go though.
@menareangrynow good point, and a good way to say it, killing children is wrong, if the argument is made that is is not a child say the first month, 4 weeks I at times finding my self buying that, but then to turn it into the women had this right but the man does not.....what sane person could agree with this. On top of it, BECUASE it had been turned in to this they are now killing babies 8 months in or & LIve Birth Obortion and these whack jobs becuase of there feminist montra justify it.
I don't know about genetic defects but anybody that would believe in anything at any time without ANY evidence does seem like a person with something wrong with them. We are still human and will probably do it at some stage in our lives, Devoting my life to it is certainly not something i would ever consider, But each to their own. Unless of course your beliefs involve the brainwashing of children,Oppression of woman, Oppression of gays and non believers, Restricting free speech etc etc.
A truly interesting take on the subject. However, I must ask, could it not reasonably be possible to still want to restrict same-sex couples from polluting & corrupting marriage and to support & preserve marriage for male/female pairings only, while at the same time fighting to repair all of the severe damage to the fabric & principles of marriage wrought by pseudo-feminism and the male-punishing feminist-manipulated family court system that MRAs are legitimately concerned & infuriated about?
Well, as I said, I don't think marriage is salvageable, and I probably should have taken the time to say that part of the problem is that it should not be regulated by government in the first place. That being said, with so little action taken to defend men from from the family court racket, I can hardly justify expending any energy worrying about gays, or protecting a legal institution that makes slaves of men every day.
Good reply, Happy, and I dare say one which finds reluctant agreement from me. I too have adopted the radical belief that the best thing for us would be for municipal governments to detach themselves & their influence from "marriage" altogether, leaving it up to the "churches" for those with any religious convictions or just allowing legally recognized "POSSLQ" unions. Unfortunately, that's not reality, and like the classic "Tarryton" smokers of the 1970s, I'd rather fight than switch.
In a private ceremony or church marriage, the state or society do not have a right to tell you who you can or cannot marry. however, as soon as you step outside the private realm of RELIGIOUS marriage and enter into the public sphere of CIVIL marriage, you are subject to the law and public opinion or vote because civil marriage is about public policy.
I agree. I feel like the Republican party has abandoned men. There is nothing pro-men's rights about being drafted into war, or reinforcing idealized gender roles where the male takes on all the responsibility and heat of decision making. With divorce being, by far, the greatest threat to marriage, the false characterization of gay marriage as a great threat shows that the goal is reinforcing a dogma, rather than saving marriage.
Not that I feel like modern liberalism serves men either. I'm with itachi705: the ideals of libertarianism (paleoconservativism) / classical liberalism are what will help MRA's the most, if they must subscribe to a particular political ideology.
I'll say a prayer for all of you who posted. Looks like there is a lot of hatred. If you really want to find the right mate -just say a simple prayer. Ask Jesus to help you find the right person. I was an atheist once but today I don't worry about nothing.
Torontocollapse 4 months ago
@Torontocollapse You should worry about double negatives.
TubBunnyChews 1 month ago
A "family" is by definition a m, a woman and a child. I'm in a family and we're really happy. But I agree with this video - at least to say that things are really screwed up nowadays.
Torontocollapse 4 months ago
im not gay but thats there business they can do what the fuck they wan't
Wolf102795 4 months ago
This video I totally agree with "NO MARRIAGES !!" Did it once, will never do it again,biggest mistake I ever made by getting married and having children. Stay single and don't get involved with the opposite sex or have any children with them.
ashatbulaparanormal 5 months ago
will marriage even matter around this time of age where everything is at its best corrupted n destroyed
NSHouston19 6 months ago
Jesus is coming soon n I was thinkin will marriage even matter
NSHouston19 6 months ago
If marriage is obsolete, what do you propose as the alternative way to raise children? I certainly would not want any of my children raised by a single parent, nor would I wish to inflict upon them the uncertainty of cohabitation with their mother, always leaving open the possibility that their father could just one day decide not to come home.
SDNate760 7 months ago
So, are you saying that a child without a father is a bad thing? If so, what about all the psychology research that has proven otherwise? I just went through a difficult Infancy & Childhood psych developmental class and learned this. Lesbians actually produce the most well-adjusted children apparently.
WrathoftheGoddess 9 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess
Please name research that support anything you said.
TheHappyMisogynist 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist Here are the names of the research, so you can educate yourself: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted); "Reframing the power of lesbian daughters’ relationships with mothers through Black feminist thought"; "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
WrathoftheGoddess 8 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess
You need to give authors with studies. And when you do I will send you the ones that I have citing the increased incidence of domestic violence in lesbian homes. And it is not that I have anything against lesbians, just stupid lesbians that don't understand research.
Single fathers are the best parents.
TheHappyMisogynist 8 months ago 8
@TheHappyMisogynist I would link them to you, but youtube won't allow me to. And those are the names of the published studies, all you have to do is copy and paste them into Google.
I am a psychology major and I have yet to see any research supporting any of your wild claims. As long as a child has a responsive, secure, warm caregiver, that is all they need, regardless of gender. My friend did her undergrad study on lesbian parenting. I'd like to see the research you claim to have.
WrathoftheGoddess 8 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess (part 2) Do you research only those so-called "studies" which tend to support your view, or do you also research those that contradict it? Also, Is this a common view held by all lesbians. I thank my dear father for being in my life and teach me to be the man that I am today. I don't have any problem with gays and lesbians and their life-style, but I do have problem when they try to develop and foster dangerous ideology and philosophy that attent to make fatherhood obsolete.
pedrom41 7 months ago
@pedrom41 The finding of your so-called research doesn't suggest that all those single moms raising kids by themselves should all turn into lesbians--does it? Or that the solution to the high rate of African-American males incarceration is for the whole community to turn into gays and lesbians. That's not what the research suggests--does it?
pedrom41 7 months ago
@pedrom41 The fact is that there is no legitimate research that shows ANY correlation between gay/lesbian parenting and negative affects on children. "Develop and foster dangerous ideology and philosophy"? Do you realize how ludicrous that sounds? Fatherhood is not necessary for a child's healthy development, and neither is motherhood. A supportive, healthy, and loving caregiver is all that is necessary- regardless if they are man, woman, transsexual, or intersexual.
WrathoftheGoddess 7 months ago
Comment removed
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess And there's no research--worth its name--that support your claim either. Only partisan so-called "research." Your claim is that you found some "research" that suggests that children may be better off with two lesbians. Talking about "ludicrous' sound! Should we encourage every single mother who are struggling to raise their kids without father (specially boys) to turn lesbians? It's that the most plausible solution to that problem? That sounds more like an agenda to me.(cont)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.) New study conducted by two University of Southern California sociologists, writing in recent issue of the "America Sociological Review," found that children with lesbian or gay parents are "more likely to show more empathy for social diversity"--here you may call this an advantage. But the study also shows that the "kids themselves are probably more likely to explore homosexual activities themselves." Is this what you call "WELL-ADJUSTED CHILDREN"? ......(cont.)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Oh yeah, let's kick all the fathers out of the home and replace them with gays and lesbians. EURIKA, what a brilliant idea!!! Certainly there are differences between children raised by mother and father and those raised by two lesbians or two gays. But are these differences healthy? And is that 100% guaranteed? There's not even guarantee that the lesbian-lesbian relationship will work any more or any better than a heterosexual relationship. Moreover, the study shows...(cont.)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.)....that "lesbian mother tend to have a feminizing effect on their sons, and masculinizing effect on their daughters. The best that could be said of the findings is that "no significant differences between children of lesbian and heterosexual parents in anxiety, depression, self-esteem and numerous other measures of social and psychological adjustment were found." (Said the researchers).....(cont.)
pedrom41 7 months ago
Comment removed
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess You seem motivated to rely only upon bipartisan information that tend to support your own world view, and purposely ignoring relevant information that challenges it. In fact, have you challenged those informations you touted, or you just simply accepted it at face value? Here some links you can check if you will: "A Michigan Family Forum Resources," PhD. Warren Farrell's "Three Judicial Biases About Moms, Dads and Children."
pedrom41 7 months ago
@pedrom41 I actually don't "ignore relevant information", I'm a psychology major so we are required to expose ourselves to all the scholarly research. This is simply what I have found. Do you really believe that a father is necessary to a child's well-being? If you do, do you apply this to motherhood as well? If you believe that a mother is not necessary, but a father is, then that is pure sexist. I appreciate the links and I will check them out, thank you.
WrathoftheGoddess 7 months ago
Comment removed
WrathoftheGoddess 7 months ago
@pedrom41 Ok, I read your link and while some of Farrell's claims are made from correlational studies, which should never be done in the field of science, he makes some very good points that I already knew of. Every feminist knows that men are also hurt by patriarchy- it is traditional gender roles that men are simply the bread-winners and women are the nurturers. This is the premise of child custody cases and this sexism prevents fathers from getting paternal leave (which they are entitled to)
WrathoftheGoddess 7 months ago
@pedrom41 Did you know that in Warren Farrell's book, "Why Men Earn More Than Women", in the introduction he states, "Since 1974, feminist attorneys have been urging parental leave, rather than maternity leave, for clients. We know that what brings equality to women also brings equality to men." He even expressed his support for NOW in that book. See? Even this guy understands that feminism is doing good for men as well. :D
WrathoftheGoddess 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess You've been very selective of the things you want to respond to from everything so far I've said. Oh yeah, feminism is doing good for men as well. Gender theorist Adrienne Rich in her book "Of A Woman Born" claims that "all men--past, present, anf future are all rapist and exploiter of women." Kate Millett called for "the end of the family unit." Catharine MacKinnon declared that "marriage, rape, and prostitution are indistingushible from each other." (cont.)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.)....and our legal system--under feminists preasure--seems to be massaging fanaticism into the frame work of what it terms "jurisprudence." Consistent with the principles of classical liberalism, the Equal Protection Clause under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution says: "No state shall deny any [person] within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Feminist Jurisprudence, however, determines what level of protection an individual deserves...(cont.)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess (cont.)......based on their classification of race, sex, and so forth. Influential radical feminist--Susan Caringella, who in 2008 published her book "Addressing Rape Reform In Law and Practice"--cites in her book MacKinnon's premises which argues for legal reforms which includes "reversing the presumption of innocent in rape trials" (pages 169-83) She and other influential feminists argue that "false rape allegations are a myth." You tell me how is this "good for men."
pedrom41 7 months ago
@pedrom41 Susan Caringella does not have much evidence to back up her claims. At the most, she can conclude that false rape allegations are rare, which the FBI has confirmed with their 1% statistic. I would strongly encourage you to think critically about how feminism has helped men as well. Most of my friends are men and they are feminists because they've studied and looked into it. It's not always obvious on the surface, but when you look deeper you can see how it's made life better for men.
WrathoftheGoddess 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess "Susan Caringella does not have much evidence to.......rape allegations are rare, which the FBI....." "Most of my friends are men and they are feminists......" Up to this point I was taking you seriously, but it has become crystal clear that there's no good reason to keep this dialogue with you. Since you "strongly encourage you (me) to think critically about how feminism......." I would also strongly suggest that you read "Who Stole Feminsm" and......(cont. on 2)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess (part 2) "The War Against Boys" by scholar and Equity Feminist Christina Hoff Sommers. Unfortunatelly, many--if not most--conservative feminists scholars (both male and female) have been effectively marginalized and/or rendered invisible on most cam puses throughout the United States.
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess CORRECTION: Typo "cam puses" (I meant to type in "campuses")
pedrom41 7 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist See the issue is that all these groups say such and such individuals make the best parents etc. Instead what we need to know is what actual qualities make for the best parents? What qualities must a parent have to give the best possible guide and support for a child?
agent0sephiroth 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from TheHappyMisogynist
@WrathoftheGoddess In the African-American community more than 50% of boys are raised by single mother household--very little or no father (for a variety of reasons) involvement. Is just pure coincidence that more than have of the prison population happen to be black men? That wouldn't have anything to do with those boys growing up fatherless--would it? "Lesbians actually produce the most well-adjusted children apparently." (Cont. on part 2)
pedrom41 7 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Layman's terms: Males raised by women grow up to be manginas.
TheTruthBearer1 6 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Those are books that have been written by feminists. Go to any prison and see. 95% of the inmates in prison are from fatherless homes, over 70% of suicides are committed by kids from fatherless homes, 80% of school dropouts are from fatherless homes. Am not saying that kids from fatherless homes don't succeed but the ones who succeed are the minority e.g. Obama
wamnicho 6 months ago
@wamnicho you know those statistics when it says fatherless homes, feminists use against men more for running away and blaming the end result on them.
wetdream09 5 months ago
I have NEVER met a well adjusted man who was raised by a single woman. And EVERYTHING I have heard from associates and professionals is in line with my own observations.
Oh "non-sexist" is an important metric by your sources? Yeah, I think that explains it. Most I've know have been incompetent with women. I'm talking virgins in their mid 20s, some of them.
I had to climb my way out a real fucked up headspace about women, and when I finally did, I found I had lost interest.
AwakenedWhite 4 months ago
So, yeah, if you want psychologically castrated virgins and faggots, single mothering is the way to go.
I'm not complaining - look at the minefield I avoided. Boyfriends don't fuck you over with the legal system, they duke it out like men or they throw a bitch-fit for a few minutes. The worst a guy is likely to do is not tell you he's got the HIV. There's no AZT to reduce jail sentences or child support payments.
AwakenedWhite 4 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Lesbians never have accidental pregnancies, it is always planned and wanted.
IvanWanko 4 months ago
@IvanWanko .............Not if they are raped........... Or are only heterosexual women raped in your world?
WrathoftheGoddess 4 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Right, well show me the study that concludes that lesbians raped by men make better parents.
IvanWanko 4 months ago
@IvanWanko I never said there was a study showing that lesbians raped by men make better parents..... Just that plenty of studies show that lesbians in general make just as good parents as gays.
WrathoftheGoddess 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WrathoftheGoddess "Lesbians actually produce the most well-adjusted children apparently". Your own words betray you.
IvanWanko 4 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Do you have any actual evidence? Or are you just like every other feminist I have ever conversed with, an irrational, childish, lying, moron? Though, from your previous comments I don't think I have to ask that question.
IvanWanko 4 months ago
@IvanWanko Well, if you want to determine who is childish and irrational, you could look back over your own comment and note the many unnecessary insults you have flung at me. Here are some: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted); "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
WrathoftheGoddess 4 months ago
@IvanWanko I tend to think irrationality and childishness look like flinging around insults at people you know nothing about, like what you just did. Here: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted); "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
WrathoftheGoddess 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IvanWanko I tend to think irrationality and childishness look like flinging around insults at people you know nothing about, like what you just did. Here: "ADULTS RAISED AS CHILDREN IN LESBIAN FAMILIES"; "Boys’ household work in single-mother households" (this one shows how boys in single-mother homes grow up non-sexist and very well-adjusted), "Family relationships and adolescent behavior: A look at families headed by heterosexual, lesbian, and gay parents".
WrathoftheGoddess 4 months ago
@IvanWanko I don't think she has. She just keeps vomiting out the same stuff. She's like a parrot, except not bright.
blacktigerpaw1 2 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Hey, bitcho, watch this video /watch?v=quPKVa823Jw&feature=feedu Does it support your case?
IvanWanko 4 months ago
@WrathoftheGoddess The study you cite has been thrown out of numerous courtrooms and ridiculed in the academic communities. It compares hetro single mothers to lesbian single mothers, neither of which are exactly grade-a child raising formulas. The real statistical evidence is for a one man one woman permanent union rearing biological offspring.
No credible study has ever found that gay or single parents can come close to straight pairs.
nofalltoofar 2 weeks ago
@nofalltoofar I have never heard of it being "thrown out" of courtrooms and academic communities as it was an academic site I got it from.
That is SO not true, and you are being homophobic. The truth is that it matters not the gender, sexual orientation, race, etc. of a parent, but their ability to parent and caregive.
It's hypocritical that these "Men's rights" activists claim that men make better parents. Why? For having a penis? Sounds sexist to me.
WrathoftheGoddess 2 weeks ago
@WrathoftheGoddess Ah, name calling. The best way to know you've won an argument.
nofalltoofar 2 weeks ago
@nofalltoofar Homophobia is a serious offense, and I will call you out on it without hesitation. So, yes, name-calling.
WrathoftheGoddess 1 week ago
@WrathoftheGoddess There was a show done somewhat recently by the BBC called The Biology of Dads that proves with both psychological and scientific research that it is a bad thing and children do need fathers. In fact science has even discovered that girls who don't have fathers go into puberty at an accelerated rate. So that they look older than girls who have fathers during adolescence as a biological adaption in order to find a male for protection in absence of protection from a father.
dubified89 6 months ago
Ghost writers I suppose huh?
TMac473 1 month ago
@WrathoftheGoddess You are so full of shit. The directionless, underachieving and unsure children of the 70s, 80s and 90s are called "the fatherless generation." Now there are insecure, self-serving and illogical Gen Yers that are the bane of teachers, intractable and unable to hold attention span since daddy never taught them since mommy kicked him away. And you learned something in a female, doctrine dominated university? Big surprise! Break the family up and Marxism succeeds. Psych is dogma.
corioa 1 month ago
I love how most male rights activists always end up being anti-gay marriage (original poster excluded). What, so you'll fight for men's rights, but only straight men's rights? What goddamn hypocrites.
redgirlinbluedresses 9 months ago
@redgirlinbluedresses
You must not keep up very much. The great majority of MRA's don't have any investment in marriage at all, much less gay marriage. Most all of us are against marriage period,
TheHappyMisogynist 9 months ago 11
@TheHappyMisogynist My comment was actually referring to a few of the other commentators' posts who appeared to still be in favor of marriage so long as it wasn't gay. However, I couldn't hyperlink all of them, so I just left a general comment. I'm very well aware of what your view on marriage is, hence why I said "original poster excluded."
redgirlinbluedresses 9 months ago
@redgirlinbluedresses What exactly did he say that was anti-gay? Did you even listen to what he said? He spent the entire video bashing those who opposed gay marriage and the rest simply criticizing the institution of marriage as a whole. Please quote exactly what he said in this video that was anti gay, please be specific.
LeftoverJedi 9 months ago
I have to disagree with your point of view about paterachy,but view on marriage,I agree with 90% with it.
diehardmonarchist 9 months ago
libbyandtai 10 months ago
@libbyandtai
As a devout Atheist it might feel a tad hypocritical following the Bible. And besides, I'd rather not follow the example of a lot of good Christian men who found that Jesus couldn't find his way into the family court with them. Those guys end up axed all the time, so don't try to kid me.
TheHappyMisogynist 10 months ago
Nonsense.
The feminists have not won this, and marriage is not dead. If we want to preserve the freedom that women really want, then marriage is the best option. Just because some people have a problem living up to high standards doesn't mean we jettison the standards. Nor does it mean we get to redefine them as homosexuals want. The issue is Men's Rights, and we must insist on them if marriage is to work at all, which are good foundations for families. Call it theocracy if you want.
MikeTMerciless 11 months ago
@MikeTMerciless cont...The problem with marriage really is the fact that it's been politicized. Get government out of marriage. Conservatives want that, ultimately. But I guarantee you homosexual activists and feminists do not want this, neither do leftists. Doing so takes the ultimate goal of both government and all of their allies off the table, which is control, and the ultimate elimination of the family as a institution for men.
MikeTMerciless 11 months ago
All of the commentary from both these political demagogues and yourself alike have no real relevance to life as I've observed it thus far, in the rural area I'm from. I don't mean rural as in out in the middle of a ghost town, or a trailer court, but generally well to do areas in the Midwest. Sometimes I'm glad that I come from a pastoral area where such useless issues have no effect on me.
neuraxianfusion 11 months ago
@neuraxianfusion the problem I have with rural areas is that there are lots of religious quacks and conspiracy theorists, but the women can be better out here
SeeProfileForDetails 11 months ago
@SeeProfileForDetails I think that aspect of rural areas is far overplayed. Perhaps I live in a unique anomaly in America, but most people here spend their time doing things that I think any American, or maybe even any human being would be loathe to deprecate. Those things being volunteering for the community, attending community events, spending quiet evenings with their family, and attending to various personal projects such as gardening and home improvement.
neuraxianfusion 11 months ago
@neuraxianfusion I think it is far underplayed. I just moved to a rural area a few years ago, and there are alcoholics who drink and drive because they aren't skeptical, they have wives that are into conspiracies and alex jones, along with churches everywhere. That being said, the country life is nice and there are genuinely friendly people, even the alcoholics.
SeeProfileForDetails 11 months ago
@SeeProfileForDetails Well given that my observation was just that, an observation, and is contrary to a popular generalization propagated mostly to bolster the ego of urban dwellers, I'm going to assume that your belief that the religious and alcoholic aspects of rural life are underplayed is more based in ideology than reality.
neuraxianfusion 11 months ago
@neuraxianfusion Why would it be based on ideology? Just go to the small town websites and look at the events section... A.A. meetings, Church announcements, Evangelist organizations, have you actually done any research on small town living or do you just pretend that small towns are liberal atheist communities? that being said, and even personally seeing people guzzling beer down before they drive with their eyes glazed over, the people are genuinely friendly - just stupid.
SeeProfileForDetails 11 months ago
@SeeProfileForDetails You obviously are ideologically motivated, because most liberal atheist communities I've been too, i.e. larger cities on the coast, are absolutely terrible places to live. Also, everything you claim happens in a small town, the sort of environment I was raised in and thus have more experience than you with, has not happened in the area I live at all. Where as you have obvious motivations to promote liberalism and atheism, I only have observation.
neuraxianfusion 11 months ago
@neuraxianfusion You obviously are basing everything purely on assumptions. I'm not a liberal, nor an atheist. I'm a agnostic and I do not vote, but libertarianism looks good. The city is also full of drunks too, but these drunks often can take a taxi home, whereas a farmer cannot, and therefore the acreage and farmer people are putting people's lives at risk.
SeeProfileForDetails 11 months ago
The more I watch videos like these, the more I consider learning to speak Chinese in preperation for a move as a feasible survival tactic.
TheLordmep 11 months ago
I don't mind the end of marriage. Finally something we agree on.
angeltears87 1 year ago
The government has not business regulating marriage. Marriage should be governed under contract law. And those contracts should be enforced with the same objectivity as any other kind of contract.
Those who breach the contract should not profit from that breach.
gamenode 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You like marry this girls ** rockmycity.info **
aviishabegam 1 year ago
Im a conservative but im liberal on the ideal of gay marriage. i think marriage is a joke, especially when the divorce rate is more than 50%. if gays wants to get married, let them. it is their "pursuit of happiness" and we should do things that make us happy so long as we don't hurt anyone. And about those people who argue for the sanctity of marriage, they are cheaters themselves (Senator John Ensign, anyboby?)
foremount 1 year ago
Men just see the results of the mis-implementation of legislation in courts that men are allowing to go on. There is no such thing as unilateral no-fault divorce. What happens when you read the legislation is that the Husband is ambushed into taking part and the court presumes that he also wants a divorce. Any thing else would be un-Constitutional.
We conducted a survey. 96% (really) said they wanted to get married. Why shouldn't they. What has Elam to offer instead homosexuality, prostitutes?
dadtheman49 1 year ago
Why is it that so-called men's rights activists, like this ranter Elam, all turn out if you give them enough time to be feminists. The number one goal of feminism has always been to eradicate the Family founded on Marriage simply because the Family has rights superior to the State and all feminists are Marxists. By definition Elam is a feminist and a 5th columnist.
The acid test is ask these wannabe destroyers of Marriage have they ever read a single word of legislation on Marriage. They haven't
dadtheman49 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try to change your life ** rockmycity.info **
adahweisingerkxc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Latino Beauties are there rockmycity.info
kolenakolenaliya 1 year ago
I looked just like that cat when I first discovered the shit the average man deals with in this generation. 0:42
ManSpeakOut 1 year ago
(Marriage is destructive) Save the family by not getting married.
AnarchoSyndicalistt 1 year ago 5
Totally agree
AnarchoSyndicalistt 1 year ago
I wonder how the family courts would react to a gay couple with adopted kids splitting up - which side would they automatically support and what side would they demonize!
unassumption 1 year ago
@unassumption
That is easy. The man with the most money would be the bad guy.
TheHappyMisogynist 1 year ago 19
@TheHappyMisogynist
TOO TRUE. These days, it is an economic institution, not a sacred institution.
sccrow72 1 year ago
Good vid. I never thought men's rights was a political thing anyway. However I do see how some men would put politics in it or make it political. Wrong thing to do.
cjjaxxon 1 year ago
Marriage is a CHANCE, u could have children & live happily ever after. If a man want's children, what other CHANCE does he have. To have a child with a women u would not otherwise be willing to marry puts you at the mercy of a woman, u would not be willing to marry. Even the women u might have a chance with, would also, in the end, subcum to the societal pressure of using the child against u as sperm donor. My biggest fear is having children that I am nothing more then a $ check too.
ORVX 1 year ago 2
@ORVX my question below/above is real, im 38 and not married for a reason but I still think I'd like to have children, I don't see it being a happy life if I can't pull the hat trick and get luck with a women for ever. Sure I know if I marry and it falls apart im screwd, but if I want children how do I have any other GOOD choice?
Any thoughs?
ORVX 1 year ago
marriage is a new age shell trick nowadays and as the author asserts a spent institution and a mere trap for mooney eyed male fools
that "is "right !! the guy marries the state hahahahhh feminit marriage laws are tomes of trip wires leading to truncation of butthead by the feminit judiciary for the benefit of his ex wife to be
his kids his assets and a living wage/ salary mere memories
shazam20007 1 year ago
Once upon a time, a guy asked a beautiful girl 'Will you marry me?'
The girl said, 'NO!' And the guy lived happily ever after and rode
motorcycles and went fishing and hunting and played golf a lot and
drank beer and scotch and had tons of money in the bank and left the
toilet seat up and farted whenever he wanted..
The end
S2Cents 1 year ago 61
True. Not enough happy endings like that these days.
Leco070 1 year ago
@S2Cents hahaha W0W,.. ;) lucky for him !
shahminhajuddin 1 year ago
@S2Cents And the guy also had as many fucks as he wanted without needing to take care of one woman for his entire life!
RNamek 6 months ago
Is the "chick" in the red bra actually a very scrawny dude? Looks like it.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
Why do feminists question the works of women who don't agree with them. They are their fellow women, so why do they fought them. (yes I'm being stupid for my reasons.)
ghostrider481 2 years ago
Well said man,marriage is a bad idea for men!
crypter27 2 years ago
I'm not sure if you can blame feminists for divorce rates - divorce isn't necessarily a bad thing, as long as one party isn't going to eat up all the other's money.
unassumption 2 years ago
DANG!
This video made me think - and I don't do that too often :).
"The Sanctity of Marriage" - It does not exist now - so why try to preserve it...
Marriage is nothing more that a redistribution of wealth system from hard-working men to wage-gap whining women.
Yeah, there is no sanctity of marriage anymore...
Another excellent video!
sccrow72 2 years ago 2
That's one problem*
ghostrider481 2 years ago
I think religion, not feminism destroyed marriage. You seem to think that women are solely to blame for all societies problems. If that's not true please clarify because that's the overwhelming sense I'm getting from these videos.
ScaryCannibalTrout1 2 years ago
How did religion destroy marriage?
Religion did the exact opposite, religion CREATED marriage.
Blaming women for all of societies problems? Why don't YOU clarify on what makes you feel that?
thecreepyguy 2 years ago
@thecreepyguy
I feel that way because in all these videos all he does is say feminists are wrong and stupid and men are so oppressed and life is so hard for them because of women and so on. And he doesn't recognise that men have any faults at all.
I don't believe in religion or marriage and I think society would be better off without them anyway. Religion destroys what a mating partnership should be- love and natural equality.
ScaryCannibalTrout1 2 years ago
Then you should view my "rant at men" video. Not that it would make any difference. I don't think you are intelligent enough to understand my work.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
@TheHappyMisogynist
Wow, that comment was very condescending. Everyone who doesn't agree with you or questions what you say is unintelligent. What I don't understand is why you're insulting me when I never did that to you. Would you mind telling me?
ScaryCannibalTrout1 2 years ago
Sorry, I didn't even see this till matriarch commented to defend you. It is actually just a matter of time. Anyone who thoughtfully reviews my work doesn't conclude that could not conclude that I think women are to blame for societies ills. It is just a reaction typical for people who cannot comprehend the idea that women can be held to account for anything at all. So no, women are not the source of all our ills. The problem is bigger than that. It is a system, CONTINUED..
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
with male and female participation, that colludes to make men culpable for everything while exonerating women. And I do maintain that anyone who puts some intelligence into evaluating my words sees that.
I am very busy at what I do, so I don't bother with taking everyones hand and walking them through this. Not everyone was born to get it.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
'I don't think you are intelligent enough to understand my work'
You sound infantile
Could you never satisfy a woman
Can you imagine for a second that you are wrong, if you can't you are beyond delusion; you are lost.
And intelligence necessitates logic and that branches from it. Your view is sided, arugmentative, lacking, self serving.
You are neither God nor a human being worthy of further caricature
matriarchymetic 2 years ago
Oh my, you have surely put me in my place. Just imagine the dose of humility I now feel from the awesome power of your words.
But, on somewhat more serious note, trying to shame an MRA over whether he could satisfy a woman is a waste of time. You should save it for those who invest their self esteem in the approval of children.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
@matriarchymetic lol, you sound like fun a gal, goo look at my other comment, then understand you have really made me understand what he is saying and feel 2nd guess my sanity in even having that question.
ORVX 1 year ago
@ORVX which one?
matriarchymetic 1 year ago
@matriarchymetic which ever one you want loser, it don't matter, I did not go back to read what you said, since I posted a few weeks ago, all I remember is you a bitter wowmen, in the end it is what it is, we both now you are homley women that is up set that even though your whinning and ranting has produced signifigant advatnages for women, good looking women still rule the day.
ORVX 1 year ago
@ORVX
Human beings are generally educable with few exceptions. You leap instead of attempting to engage my point. If you can not argue, debate my point, a point that is your trouble.
M-ale, sip it down drink it Wel-L
matriarchymetic 1 year ago
@matriarchymetic you flap lips well speak no word, hahahha c I can be profound and clever also, lol, how many times have you used that one. trust me, you look like a boob, stop it!
ORVX 1 year ago
I don't blame feminism for are society's problems although feminists didn't help and don't seem to be try or want to fix this problems expect the ones that are for women. I think the real problem in are society is lack of education or the ignorant who choose to be argent to how laws affect them and those who believe nearly anything their told because it sounds good. And don't question anything they just believe. That one I can see with western society.
ghostrider481 2 years ago
Anyone want to put a wager on how much longer the human race is going to be around with all of this hatred between the sexes.
ghostrider481 2 years ago 2
I don't think men hate women. I think they are angry at them. I think they have some good reasons.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
I mean with all of the anger between the sexes how much longer will the human race be around when more men are going to reproduce.
ghostrider481 2 years ago
aren't*
ghostrider481 2 years ago
Agreed. They are developing a birth control pill for men. It will free them from the trap of paternity fraud, but doesn't much bode well for humanity in the end.
But then again, when women lose their hegemony over men, they might actually wake up.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
Well time will give us the answers.
ghostrider481 2 years ago
The feminist movement was a legal accusation for equality.
I think you have swallowed the media spin of what feminism is or was, you can't pick and choose which sources you wish to listen to and then espouse this notion that they are saying nothing at all.
Read the work of feminist, quote them directly and then you can have an engaged debate and not this sounded rationale when in fact it is blatant misreading.
matriarchymetic 2 years ago
Oh yeah, that's me. Media spin swallower. And gee, I never though of reading the works of feminists before. Great idea!
(rolls eyes and logs out)
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
Comment removed
matriarchymetic 2 years ago
Open your eyes and read something beyond your own entry into survival.
You are wrong and this usury of gay marriage to cement your argument belongs on Fox, for its vile with its blatant.
You are not going to have the gays patting you on your heads.
If you can only be tall when someone is on their knees then you have a serious problem buddy.
matriarchymetic 2 years ago
I don't give a flying fuck what gays think about this video. I am not here to try to get pats on the head from them. My dialogue is with Men's Rights Activists.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
Argue my points
matriarchymetic 2 years ago
If someone told you that you were giving orders here, they lied to you.
Make a cogent point and I will consider answering it. Otherwise, ESAD
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
The feminist movement was a legal accusation for equality.
matriarchymetic 2 years ago
Great video Paul, I agree with most of your points. About those patriarchs you mention, the strange thing about many of these men (who claim to be MRA's), is that they practically seem to be encouraging a return to a time when only wealthy property owners had any rights and most men were virtual slaves, being worked to death for almost no money and if you complained, your own local police force would show up to beat some sense into you! How is this guilded age mentality good for men?
Introspectre1 2 years ago
...My grandfather gets drunk every weekend.
He has married 12 hookers in the past 9 years. Hilarious.
What's left of marriage? A legal contract saying you love each other...To me. That is bullshit. I do not need a ring, nor do I need a contract or a Priest to unite me with a man.
Fuck. You. Marriage.
NaziXSandwhich 2 years ago
awesome video man you covered a lot of topics and hit the nail on the head each and every last one of them, Especially the patriarchs and MRA's bit, Which is something I've been reluctant to talk about, But am thankful someone has.
thecreepyguy 2 years ago
I'm a woman and I love your videos. Keep them coming!
solarpanelasses 2 years ago 3
Well said, Paul! Gay marriage is just a red herring to distract the public from what's really wrong with marriage today. It's a smokescreen to conceal issues like the 50% divorce rate, child custody, child support, paternity fraud & false accusations of rape & domestic violence. Instead of legalizing gay marriage, I propose we do away with marriage, period. If 2 or more people (of same or opposite genders) want to live together, fine; they don't need a worthless piece of paper to formalize it!
CCRoxtar 2 years ago
"the idea of days where men held all power and dominion over women was imagined."
i do not agree with this. this was not revisionist history. that's just crazy to say that. was there no holocaust either?
jenlazee 2 years ago
Isnt it revisionist history?
Since when were kings sent off to die for their subjects? Since when were lords sent out to work in the fields for their serfs? It does beg the question where all this supposed power over women was.
Also many others make a hysterical analogy using the holocaust, but I cant see why?
I must have missed the jews on the lifeboat before nazis policy.
jazzdbassman87 2 years ago
jenazee Women have NEVER been oppressed; the opposite they have been protected from the hardship that was the essence of life 99% of history. Only point you have made is that ALL people were subjected to control of a few families for 99.99% of humanity; a point feminist like to ignore when engadged in revisionist history as to how men, always the oppressors, in reality they nothing more then victims, just like ever one else. Victims that took the blunt of hammer while protecting the family.
ORVX 2 years ago
Gratuitous holocaust reference aside, you, like most of the culture, have bought into the myth of women's oppression. Never happened. Not even close. If anything, the rules of conduct regarding women left them being treated not as slaves, but as royalty.
My next video will deal with this.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I say get rid of the shit all together....along with researching ways to spot homosexuality before birth so they can be aborted. Homos are a genetic defect just like people who fall to the mass delusion called religion
Supernova310 2 years ago
So you want to abort all people that might become religious, too?
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sure if its found that mass delusion can't be cured which it can't so yes... Research a trait found in all who fall to mass delusion and abort them too... then after generations of that happening the world can move on with no worry of bullshit like whats happening today
Supernova310 2 years ago
I think we are better off aborting people prone to amazingly stupid ideas.
I am neither gay nor religious, but I can tolerate both much more than rancid ignorance.
You're a bloody fool.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
im agnostic, but can see how ridicules a guy like Supernova is, he hates Beaver Cleaver, not god.MOST scientist believe in a higher power, it is simply how u define. Guys like Supernova do great harm to furtherance of science. What is worse is that an atheist, right or wrong is doing the same thing as fundamentalist. They profess 100% certainty about what they can't know. Religion is what some bad people have used to do bad things, just like guns dont kill people, people kill people with guns.
ORVX 2 years ago
...And tell us, Supernova, just "where" do we spot this "before birth genetic defect"? Which gene or set of genes indicate non-straight sexual persuasion? Anyone who honestly & objectively reviews all of the various data without concern for supporting a particular agenda will realize that the whole "born that way" mantra is mostly a myth: a desperate bogus claim intended to attribute non-straight sexuality to some "phantom" condition rather than to personal choice or psychological issues.
KidBrotherIsWatching 2 years ago
why does homosexuality happens in animals? i mean, i'm straight and i don't really like all the gay rights stuff - more the way they go about it than what they want, but i'm curious about that.
delyshBB 2 years ago
@delysh: in an upcoming chapter of my ongoing playlist series on the topic of homosexual rights, I will be addressing that phenomenon & correcting a major misconception about what is really going on in so-called "animal homosexuality" and spotlighting a key principle about it which almost completely goes overlooked. In brief, there are some important things about the phenomenon that glbt supporters & defenders are trying to keep hidden or obscured which I intend to expose in the next few weeks.
KidBrotherIsWatching 2 years ago
look, i don't support marriage for homosexuals. i believe marriage is a religious institution and the state should be taken out of it. but homosexuality is natural according to science.
delyshBB 2 years ago
@delysh: Despite my religious philosophy, I believe marriage is less a religious institution than a societal one. I understand secular government's investment in 'regulating' it, but laws are so terribly slanted pro-female/anti-male I'd rather it detached itself altogether & allow individual couples to mutually set their own committment guidelines, then homo-marriage wouldn't be an issue. Re: the supposed "science" of homosexuality, I still encourage you to follow my ongoing series for insight.
KidBrotherIsWatching 2 years ago
1) Homosexuals are not 'genetic defects'. Care to back up your claim by siting which alleles cause homosexuality, as well as it being a defective mutation; and, from which chromosome?
2) Religious people are not a genetic defect; and, nor is religion a 'mass delusion'. How are they out of touch? Are you all-knowing enough to say, who is sane or not?
3) As far as abortion goes: abort the aborters, save the babies!
menareangrynow 2 years ago
Why are you defending religion maan?
Agreed with point one, As for point 3, I don't have a problem with abortion and do not subscribe to pro-life rhetoric, There is something called the male abortion, If you haven't already look that up.
thecreepyguy 2 years ago
Is challenging the view that religious people suffer from a genetic disorder, defending religion or defending people from unwarranted claims? I take issue with such claims; because, they are unfounded slander. If someone is going to claim that there exists a genetic defect, I want to see the research as to which alleles are causing it. In this incident, there is no evidence yet provided; it is just meant to insult religious people, for no reason other than to be abrasive.
menareangrynow 2 years ago
As for abortion, I detest people telling me that someone has a right to kill my children- especially since that 'right' to commit infanticide is only conferred on the basis of gender. How sexist! How callous and foul!
menareangrynow 2 years ago
Well that is unfortunate but there is nothing we can do about that, Until the arrival of an artificial womb, Then we can do something. Did you look at the male abortion? that's fixing one problem, I acknowledge we still have a long way to go though.
thecreepyguy 2 years ago
@menareangrynow good point, and a good way to say it, killing children is wrong, if the argument is made that is is not a child say the first month, 4 weeks I at times finding my self buying that, but then to turn it into the women had this right but the man does not.....what sane person could agree with this. On top of it, BECUASE it had been turned in to this they are now killing babies 8 months in or & LIve Birth Obortion and these whack jobs becuase of there feminist montra justify it.
ORVX 1 year ago
I don't know about genetic defects but anybody that would believe in anything at any time without ANY evidence does seem like a person with something wrong with them. We are still human and will probably do it at some stage in our lives, Devoting my life to it is certainly not something i would ever consider, But each to their own. Unless of course your beliefs involve the brainwashing of children,Oppression of woman, Oppression of gays and non believers, Restricting free speech etc etc.
thecreepyguy 2 years ago
A truly interesting take on the subject. However, I must ask, could it not reasonably be possible to still want to restrict same-sex couples from polluting & corrupting marriage and to support & preserve marriage for male/female pairings only, while at the same time fighting to repair all of the severe damage to the fabric & principles of marriage wrought by pseudo-feminism and the male-punishing feminist-manipulated family court system that MRAs are legitimately concerned & infuriated about?
KidBrotherIsWatching 2 years ago
Well, as I said, I don't think marriage is salvageable, and I probably should have taken the time to say that part of the problem is that it should not be regulated by government in the first place. That being said, with so little action taken to defend men from from the family court racket, I can hardly justify expending any energy worrying about gays, or protecting a legal institution that makes slaves of men every day.
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
Good reply, Happy, and I dare say one which finds reluctant agreement from me. I too have adopted the radical belief that the best thing for us would be for municipal governments to detach themselves & their influence from "marriage" altogether, leaving it up to the "churches" for those with any religious convictions or just allowing legally recognized "POSSLQ" unions. Unfortunately, that's not reality, and like the classic "Tarryton" smokers of the 1970s, I'd rather fight than switch.
KidBrotherIsWatching 2 years ago
0:53 Is that Amy Winehouse?
Suitsnappy 2 years ago
Good eye. :)
TheHappyMisogynist 2 years ago
In a private ceremony or church marriage, the state or society do not have a right to tell you who you can or cannot marry. however, as soon as you step outside the private realm of RELIGIOUS marriage and enter into the public sphere of CIVIL marriage, you are subject to the law and public opinion or vote because civil marriage is about public policy.
kenballer00 2 years ago
I agree. I feel like the Republican party has abandoned men. There is nothing pro-men's rights about being drafted into war, or reinforcing idealized gender roles where the male takes on all the responsibility and heat of decision making. With divorce being, by far, the greatest threat to marriage, the false characterization of gay marriage as a great threat shows that the goal is reinforcing a dogma, rather than saving marriage.
Gogonostop 2 years ago 14
Not that I feel like modern liberalism serves men either. I'm with itachi705: the ideals of libertarianism (paleoconservativism) / classical liberalism are what will help MRA's the most, if they must subscribe to a particular political ideology.
Gogonostop 2 years ago
Excellent!
TatutKhem 2 years ago