I thumbed up this video :D - but I give a big thumbs down to the dept. of state because their little tutorial thing there is a buncha propaganda. hmph.
I hope my detractors will be able to look at this, particularly the first part here, showing the employers of trafficked people. Now, pretend sex work isn't a crime. Pretend sex workers are organized, have representation, rights, and pay taxes. They have made great headway toward combating the stigma on their work and themselves. We'd still have greedy people wanting to exploit the market with cheap labor, basically.
Well done. I'm relieved to learn that the official definition, with the key phrase "through force, fraud, or coercion," comes close to what most of us think of as "trafficking." The definition given in that debate of the other night was much broader. I should be surprised to learn that a person claiming to have done extensive "research" on trafficking cannot even give an accurate definition of the word when asked, but I'm beyond being surprised over such things.
@IndifferentSky I'll be uploading a video talking about this more in a while. I just wanted to put out there the U.S.D.S. video they had on their site without any commentary or elaboration. It's a good basic starting point and clearly much more can be said.
@DiwataMan agreed. I ought to send you the doc I have...but I want to do a video on it. I already sent it out to people. There's an extensive list of the dynamics that control people in migrant situations. They put people in three tiers and located thousands of sex workers in the UK that were not in the vulnerable category, but it's clear why they are still under the trafficking umbrella, just under a certain tier. Good study for both "sides" very well done, etc.
Wow that is pretty bad no matter how you slice it. They didn't even make an attempt to make a distinction.
HannibaltheVictor13 1 month ago
I thumbed up this video :D - but I give a big thumbs down to the dept. of state because their little tutorial thing there is a buncha propaganda. hmph.
FeministWhore 1 month ago
But... but... but... without human trafficking, how would HB13 ever find a wife?
eagleeye1975 1 month ago
I hope my detractors will be able to look at this, particularly the first part here, showing the employers of trafficked people. Now, pretend sex work isn't a crime. Pretend sex workers are organized, have representation, rights, and pay taxes. They have made great headway toward combating the stigma on their work and themselves. We'd still have greedy people wanting to exploit the market with cheap labor, basically.
xxxild 1 month ago
Well done. I'm relieved to learn that the official definition, with the key phrase "through force, fraud, or coercion," comes close to what most of us think of as "trafficking." The definition given in that debate of the other night was much broader. I should be surprised to learn that a person claiming to have done extensive "research" on trafficking cannot even give an accurate definition of the word when asked, but I'm beyond being surprised over such things.
Ramiiam 1 month ago
the ones that have been caught with the slave domestic help did not have those uppity accents, they're lots of times immigrants themselves.
IndifferentSky 1 month ago
@IndifferentSky I'll be uploading a video talking about this more in a while. I just wanted to put out there the U.S.D.S. video they had on their site without any commentary or elaboration. It's a good basic starting point and clearly much more can be said.
DiwataMan 1 month ago
@DiwataMan agreed. I ought to send you the doc I have...but I want to do a video on it. I already sent it out to people. There's an extensive list of the dynamics that control people in migrant situations. They put people in three tiers and located thousands of sex workers in the UK that were not in the vulnerable category, but it's clear why they are still under the trafficking umbrella, just under a certain tier. Good study for both "sides" very well done, etc.
IndifferentSky 1 month ago