i read somewhere that the Ivy Bridge CPU multiplier will be locked to 63x. does that mean a possible 6.3 GHz overclock? (not, feasible, but still possible?)
@andrewb90atmedotcom that would be interesting, impossible as far as i can see, without a power source how can something run but if the current i5 2500k is a 95w processor maybe they will be able to equal its performance at 1w of power, but then that doesn't include overclocking which at 1w of power would overclock like a bitch, 5ghz for i5 2500k eh at 1w think 20ghz O.O
@danthemanzizzle This is really just SB with a die shrink. Which is FUCKING AWESOME!! I wouldn't say this is brand new tech but more of a referesh of SB. But look at how efficient SB is already compared to AMD. An OC'ed I7 2600k uses what like half the power of a BD at 4.8 GHZ. We already see people maintaining 5ghz 24/7 OC's from todays SB; I think we will be seeing 6 GHZ and up with this one:) Not only that the clock per clokc performance will be increased as well. OMG this is gonna be nuts
@lamiac2411 well see it is new technology because there is more then just making the die smaller, there using a new way of actually putting the transistors on, 22nm is pretty small considering 5nm is the atomic level because with each new technology its not just about making it faster its making it run faster and take less power to do so which is what this is doing i am no doubt going to go out and buy the i5 2500k equivalent of the ivy bridge.
@GerardoIx um so who cares? I'm just saying quantum computers are going to be better then the current technology. Molecular isn't really that special so its smaller then what we have now so what? Quantum computers still has much more potential and molecular computer is just a stepping stone.
@SuperDarkroman i just hope it doesnt come to the point where we cant think of anything and all we can do is just upgrade the architechture and add more L3 cache memory that would be the end of technology as we know it...
@TheMusicfriend Does AMD have a 22nm design? Hmmm? On the other hand, Intel has come out with its merchandise on time. Bulldozer has taken forever to come out due to constant delays. Intel is already improving on 22nm design with 'Haswell', doing to Ivy Bridge what 2600k did to i7's. So, no, Intel does NOT fail. AMD is getting very far behind by their standards.
@crazy88boss Thank you CPU maker AMD is technically peevish now behind time, and I think that reservation of a future share becomes scarce. The advantage of Ivy Bridge of Intel 1. The degree of location of a unit area goes up by leaps and bounds. 2. There are few losses and the energy-saving effect comes out of TDP. 3. The loss of speed of operation decreases.
CPU pattern was before and behind 1μm ten years ago. I think that it almost becomes a molecular level 4 nm, and making as the semiconductor circuit to the pattern is impossible near.
@h4xmode There is a point at which Microchips cannot use smaller lithograpgy as there would not be enough atoms to even make a functioning transistor. And also AMD Bulldozer is not the competition, it is the competition to Sandy Bridge. Just saying.
@ContinentalHeretic Intel is competing with itself? Also I read up on this EUV lithography thing designed for 7/8 Nanometers. I'm not even in college, nor I know anything about particle physics, chemistry, etc, etc, etc. I wouldn't have the slightest clue about how these things come into play. But if you could shine some light; that would be greatly...GREATLY... appreciated. It would be nice to know these things and have conversations with people about the architectures' of processors.
@h4xmode I'm no expert but the circuit for the microchips is made by shining light on the some areas making them melt and are then washed away. This happens on an atomic scale so the lithography basically relies on how small of a beam of light you can shine to imprint the circuit and also about doping atoms to give silicon electrical properties. Also I was saying Bulldozer is going against Sandy Bridge :) Type in How Microchips are made it's pretty interesting :)
@h4xmode I'm no expert but the circuit for the microchips is made by shining light on the some areas making them melt and are then washed away. This happens on an atomic scale so the lithography basically relies on how small of a beam of light you can shine to imprint the circuit and also about doping atoms to give silicon electrical properties. Also I was saying Bulldozer is going against Sandy Bridge :) Type in How Microchips are made it's pretty interesting :)
@hardstyle905 I didn't know that at the time of writing. I am seriously dissapointed with AMD though, I don't care about them to be honest it is the fact that I don't want Intel to be the sole-competitor because they will be charging £200 for an i3 if it was up to them.
is there a reason why tri gate wasn't used earlier? seems so simple to become a new idea just for this generation
n11lc2 6 days ago
@n11lc2 Thank you
It reached to commercialization in recent years technically about the try gate.
Hereafter is pleasure.
MrToshi3333 4 days ago
i read somewhere that the Ivy Bridge CPU multiplier will be locked to 63x. does that mean a possible 6.3 GHz overclock? (not, feasible, but still possible?)
callmesmorz 1 week ago
@callmesmorz Thank you
This is raised even the magnification and base clock
Intel Ivy Bridge Core i7 3770K Overclocked to 7Ghz Ahead of Launch
MrToshi3333 1 week ago
Will intel make these CPUs so efficient that they don't use any electricity at all?
andrewb90atmedotcom 1 month ago
@andrewb90atmedotcom that would be interesting, impossible as far as i can see, without a power source how can something run but if the current i5 2500k is a 95w processor maybe they will be able to equal its performance at 1w of power, but then that doesn't include overclocking which at 1w of power would overclock like a bitch, 5ghz for i5 2500k eh at 1w think 20ghz O.O
alvarg 3 weeks ago
@danthemanzizzle This is really just SB with a die shrink. Which is FUCKING AWESOME!! I wouldn't say this is brand new tech but more of a referesh of SB. But look at how efficient SB is already compared to AMD. An OC'ed I7 2600k uses what like half the power of a BD at 4.8 GHZ. We already see people maintaining 5ghz 24/7 OC's from todays SB; I think we will be seeing 6 GHZ and up with this one:) Not only that the clock per clokc performance will be increased as well. OMG this is gonna be nuts
lamiac2411 1 month ago
@lamiac2411 well see it is new technology because there is more then just making the die smaller, there using a new way of actually putting the transistors on, 22nm is pretty small considering 5nm is the atomic level because with each new technology its not just about making it faster its making it run faster and take less power to do so which is what this is doing i am no doubt going to go out and buy the i5 2500k equivalent of the ivy bridge.
alvarg 3 weeks ago
Laws of trinity>>>>
999CATZ 2 months ago
In the future they can´t make their transistors smaller.
They have to think about another technology that´s completely different to the actual one.
SuperDarkroman 2 months ago 3
@SuperDarkroman Thank you.
At present, in the pattern pitch of a semiconductor, 5 nm of a molecular level is a limit physically.
I think that the thing of an atomic level will be developed by research by XFEL in the 2020s.
MrToshi3333 2 months ago 4
@MrToshi3333 quantum computers are the future in my opinion. even though they are still in a "fetal state" at the moment.
jakewood12 1 month ago
@jakewood12 Thank you.
I think that I eventually also settle down with a quantum computer.
Doesn't it become in 2020 and afterwards?
YouTube Freezing CPU Ver2.2 This PC in ultra low temperature application
MrToshi3333 1 month ago
@jakewood12
Molecular computers are the next big thing, you could say they're already on baby steps
GerardoIx 1 week ago
@SuperDarkroman yea.. its called quantum computers.
Hardy123Zhao 2 months ago
@Hardy123Zhao
Wrong!!!
its called molecular computers, then after that it'll be quantum computers
GerardoIx 1 week ago
@GerardoIx um so who cares? I'm just saying quantum computers are going to be better then the current technology. Molecular isn't really that special so its smaller then what we have now so what? Quantum computers still has much more potential and molecular computer is just a stepping stone.
Hardy123Zhao 1 week ago
@SuperDarkroman i just hope it doesnt come to the point where we cant think of anything and all we can do is just upgrade the architechture and add more L3 cache memory that would be the end of technology as we know it...
krauser979 1 month ago
The music reminds me of Kill Bill movies.
Lobos222 3 months ago
@Lobos222 Thank you.
This music is healing nostalgic music.
MrToshi3333 3 months ago
love the music! :)
ZinayH 4 months ago
@ZinayH
Thank you! love the music
MrToshi3333 4 months ago
@MrToshi3333 name of the song please
youssef0eddoumali 3 months ago 2
@youssef0eddoumali Thank you. It is the theme office of the France movie (La Lecon Particuliere) of 43 years ago although it is the title of music.
MrToshi3333 3 months ago
year 3000 5 pico-meters
Ruiso7 4 months ago
@Ruiso7
Thank's Hi,,,,,, year 3500 5 femto-meters It is how
MrToshi3333 4 months ago
Intel fails with Ivy Bridge
TheMusicfriend 5 months ago
@TheMusicfriend Does AMD have a 22nm design? Hmmm? On the other hand, Intel has come out with its merchandise on time. Bulldozer has taken forever to come out due to constant delays. Intel is already improving on 22nm design with 'Haswell', doing to Ivy Bridge what 2600k did to i7's. So, no, Intel does NOT fail. AMD is getting very far behind by their standards.
crazy88boss 4 months ago
MrToshi3333 4 months ago
@TheMusicfriend
Thank's Although there might be delay a little until 2019 Intel is making efforts
MrToshi3333 4 months ago
Thank you Mr. FsimulatorX I7 The performance of 3930K is rough I7. It is almost the same as 990X.
Moreover, I think that Ivy Bridge can expect 50% by UP and energy saving 20% by performance.
MrToshi3333 5 months ago
Better to get the i7 3930K or Ivy Bridge. Sick of waiting for both Bulldozer and IvyBridge and Nvidia kepler
FsimulatorX 5 months ago
Lol STD?
jewie27 5 months ago
Thank you for the contribution.
The manufacturer that misses it is left rapid progress CPU technology.
MrToshi3333 6 months ago
Thank you for watching
CPU pattern was before and behind 1μm ten years ago. I think that it almost becomes a molecular level 4 nm, and making as the semiconductor circuit to the pattern is impossible near.
MrToshi3333 8 months ago
Thank you for looking and listening
The movie name La Lecon Particuliere(1968)
MrToshi3333 9 months ago
Thank you for looking and listening
The movie name La Lecon Particuliere(1968)
MrToshi3333 9 months ago
nice music,can u tell me the name of this song?
MrMariopropper 9 months ago
what happen after 2020???????
tomyloveu 9 months ago
@tomyloveu
Thank you for watching.
CPU pattern becomes a limit at a molecular level 5 nm.
The following become making of 3D a hybrid.
MrToshi3333 9 months ago
*sniff* 10 years until 4nm *sniff*.
h4xmode 8 months ago
@h4xmode There is a point at which Microchips cannot use smaller lithograpgy as there would not be enough atoms to even make a functioning transistor. And also AMD Bulldozer is not the competition, it is the competition to Sandy Bridge. Just saying.
ContinentalHeretic 5 months ago
@ContinentalHeretic Intel is competing with itself? Also I read up on this EUV lithography thing designed for 7/8 Nanometers. I'm not even in college, nor I know anything about particle physics, chemistry, etc, etc, etc. I wouldn't have the slightest clue about how these things come into play. But if you could shine some light; that would be greatly...GREATLY... appreciated. It would be nice to know these things and have conversations with people about the architectures' of processors.
h4xmode 5 months ago
@h4xmode I'm no expert but the circuit for the microchips is made by shining light on the some areas making them melt and are then washed away. This happens on an atomic scale so the lithography basically relies on how small of a beam of light you can shine to imprint the circuit and also about doping atoms to give silicon electrical properties. Also I was saying Bulldozer is going against Sandy Bridge :) Type in How Microchips are made it's pretty interesting :)
ContinentalHeretic 5 months ago
@h4xmode I'm no expert but the circuit for the microchips is made by shining light on the some areas making them melt and are then washed away. This happens on an atomic scale so the lithography basically relies on how small of a beam of light you can shine to imprint the circuit and also about doping atoms to give silicon electrical properties. Also I was saying Bulldozer is going against Sandy Bridge :) Type in How Microchips are made it's pretty interesting :)
ContinentalHeretic 5 months ago
@ContinentalHeretic Bulldozer is a failure. No chance against Sandy Bridge.
hardstyle905 3 months ago
@hardstyle905 I didn't know that at the time of writing. I am seriously dissapointed with AMD though, I don't care about them to be honest it is the fact that I don't want Intel to be the sole-competitor because they will be charging £200 for an i3 if it was up to them.
ContinentalHeretic 3 months ago
@h4xmode I am sorry to have become late.
About movement of the electron in a molecule domain, I think whether 5 nm is a limit as a gate as a semiconductor.
(X-ray free electron laser in the world) of my animation Now Showing will clarify after it.
MrToshi3333 3 months ago
@h4xmode I am sorry to have become late.
About movement of the electron in a molecule domain, I think whether 5 nm is a limit as a gate as a semiconductor.
(X-ray free electron laser in the world) of my animation Now Showing will clarify after it.
MrToshi3333 3 months ago
@MrToshi3333 wow 5nm thats a tiny dye XD
Ruiso7 4 months ago