Added: 5 years ago
From: Faidros86
Views: 100,038
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a load of crap!

    Are we related to whales, we both have skulls, so are we related?

  • @FutureMarineForChris No, but we are, since we both are mammals.

  • @FutureMarineForChris

    Yes we are related to EVERYTHING living, if you go back far enough.

    Humans are mammals so we are most close to mammals, whales are mammals..

    Sad that you take reality as a load of crap.

  • The narrator sounds like Liam Neeson

  • lol @ darwinian evilution!

  • Wisdom of Solomon 19:19 "For Land animals were turned into water creatures, and swimming things changed to Land;"

  • are there whales with back legs today?

  • @esraretin There are apparently some breeds of whale with small traces of back leg bones. One of the baleen whales, can't remember which one though.

  • Nice artwork, where's the evidence?

  • @VanNicky75 You don't want evidence.

  • @LazaaMMA. Your insults prove evolution is false. If your beliefs had merit you wounldnot have to insult.

  • Evolution is not controversial.

  • evolution is a bad joke. Lets produce a theory that make sense.

  • @darkfur35 It's not a bed joke, you have a weird sense of humor ^^

    Why don't you try to form a theory which explains how everything became what it is today?

    There's a lot of science you have to bring up evidence against.

    And try to avoid words like god/gods or faith or any stuff that has been debunked before. With things like this in it, every hypothesis ends up as myth based nonsense ^^

  • @M0rdH0rst Things are because they are......no major change.

  • @darkfur35 And I have a spaceship in my backyard :D

  • he he he teachers pro show this to their class :D

  • @reymosu Toads and alligators would evolve by losing their legs way quicker than a polar bear would though, considering the fact that they have already gone through that process a little bit. (they have webbed feet, can be in/swim in water for much longer, etc.)...So I'm not really sure if the polar bear which has no webbed feet, and even though they have the capability to swim long distances and hold their breath a while, its not nearly as long as a toad or alligator, can adapt that quick.

  • That was fantastic. Thanks for posting.

  • alligators and polar bears still have legs are they gonna loose there's soon also?

  • @reymosu - Are alligators and polar bears going to lose their legs soon?

    Soon? Certainly not soon. But I assume you can see why the polar bears best adapted to swimming in the water will fare best in the very near future.

    If limbs other than legs favored a species, then yes, they'd eventually - again, not "soon" - lose their legs.

  • @bjjolley dang real life pokemon I swear I just don't understand why an animal would choose living in water or living on land when they already have the best of both worlds but . i dont think thats possible because theres a growing number of polar bears drowning becuase of the ice caps melting so it definitely is survival of the fittest but not likely for evolution of the fittest catch my drift?

  • @reymosu well the melting of the ice caps is happening much much faster than anything would be able to adapt...which is why polar bears will most likely die out over time...however, something like an alligator, over millions of years may adapt to no longer have legs since there is no real threat to them or their habitat...its all a mixture of survival of the fittest, and evolution.

  • @smarty3000 well the can toads in australia adapted to grow longer legs in a short period of time so it shouldn't take that long for a polar bear to get with the program. so does that mean the cane toad is smarter than the polar bear for realizing that he has to adapt quickly?

  • @reymosu

    "does that mean the cane toad is smarter than the polar bear for realizing that he has to adapt quickly?"

    Cane toads can adapt quicker than polar bears because they have more offspring faster than a polar bear does. When you have one or two cubs per year, it's a little hard to evolve on demand right in front of a skeptical human's eyes.

  • These whales are gonna be pissed off when they realise it'll take the another 50,000,000 years to get back out of the water

  • that's the boldest claim ever.welcome to imagination land

  • A whale evolving into a cow!! say this twice and think!! AHAHAHAHAHHAHA  WTF

  • All life on Earth was created by Extraterrestrials. Our ancestors called them gods, angels, cherubs, etc

    EVOLUTION and GOD = BIG FAIL

  • @prototypo

    "All life on Earth was created by Extraterrestrials."

    Got even a sound reason to think this? let alone any evidence?

  • @prototypo I do think this also, this is simply a hypothesis to me as I have no proof for this, but in the current society it seems that the answer to the debate that goes on is generally "if science can't prove it, then God did it" which I find preposterous. We didn't have Evolution many years ago, and now that is a scientific theory, I think that if we find proof, then so may any Ancient Astronautic theory (Even as bluntly put as your comment, no offence) or extraterrestrial interference's.

  • @prototypo what created the extraterrestrials?

  • Nice to know Neeson's an athiest 

  • what documentary is this from

  • Ahahahahahahaha!!!! Frank Fish the marine biologist!!! That's the best name ever

  • @Ryan1468 This begs the question: Did the last name Fish come from the family ancestors' interest in sea life, or did the name influence his decision to pursue marine biology?

  • I just love the evolution of whales and dolphins its so amazing! and TRUE!

  • brainwashed kids at 5:15 

  • @unkhl3 its just the same way with christian children, or children of any other religion. The only difference with evolution is at least the kids are "brainwashed" into believing something thats actually true, with evidence and a scientific basis

  • @carlsm95 We had a hell of a time at school. One minute were singing hyms and reading christian bibles. Next minute I'm getting slapped by my teacher for asking where were the dinosaurs in the bible.

  • @stufaman The dinosaurs, the mammoths, the saber toothed tigers, the megatheriums, the giant insects, the dimetrodons, the giant (larger than Michael Jordan) sea scorpions, the giant eagles, the monster sized dragonflies... they should all be in the Bible, right?

  • @LesPaul2006 I'm saying it makes perfect sense. The remains of ancient animals wouldn't be mentioned in the bible as they didn't find any back then. So when they were making up all these 'God says this' stories. They wouldn't have any reason to mention them.

  • @unkhl3 lol... you're funneh

  • Great video and insightful into the process of evolution!

  • when they find a single specimen, how do they know it wasnt malformed, and not an accurate example of others of its kind?

  • @longfootbuddy From what I understand, they find several fossils around the area. If you ever see a fossil skeleton in a museum. Chances are that all it's bones did not come from the same specimen.

  • AWESOME VIDEO!!!!

  • 53 people are theotards.

  • Changing the subject. The narrator sonds like Lian Neeson.

  • THIS IS SOO COOOL

  • Yup I must be. I don't understand what "...there is THEY thing THEY call..." means. If only I was a clever bugger like you. When you decide judge everyone else, and I've noticed you seem to despise everyone for some reason. Take a good look at yourself. There is very little for anyone to like about you.

    Forget evolution vs religion. You have serious issues about your personality.

  • You do realize that there is they thing they call the "geologic column" ...

    For someone who's obsessed with proving intelligence over another, you do type out some stupid sh*t.

  • @stufaman I'm sorry you were perplexed by that "y" after "the". You really couldn't figure that out on your own? How retarded are you? On a scale of 1 to 10?

  • @stufaman I'm sorry you were perplexed by that "y" after "the". You really couldn't figure that out on your own? How retarded are you? Thoroughly and unrelentingly i'm sure.

  • Checkout David Attenborough's views on evolution vs religion. Sheer genius.

  • I want a refund on my voodoo death set.

  • I've been studying whale evolution bcuz I think it's turning out to be the best fossil evidence for Evolution, which Creationists continually deny. Some of the best fossils of whale evolution have been found only in the past 15 years. The entire collection beautifully demonstrates the transition of land mammals to whale, bcuz they show how the nostrils & middle ear (from on-land hearing to sonar) gradually changed! It's now easy to see how the transition took place via these intermediates.

  • @Cootabux The same follows here. First of all, and needless to say.. These fossils are not found in tacked. They were scattered about, then reassembled. You at least know that every T-Rex display has been a molding. We just recently completed the first fossil of a T-Rex. This is because the bones are not found in the same location.

    Also, you can line all kinds of bones in sequence and theorize some type of pattern.. Come on, you should know this. And you're telling me i'm not critical?

  • I could just as easily say that all these fossils are different mutations of whales, and nothing more. And you could never tell me wrong, because it is my "conclusion" or "interpretation" (i really hope you figure out the meaning of these words and how objects are subject to them).

    Lets take something more simple. If it's true that a cell spontaneously formed at one point in time over millions of years, then wouldn't we expect to see them constantly forming somewhere?

  • @Cootabux Apply this same logic to these fossils. Why are these animals not still in existence? If you believe the odds were good enough for something to happen because of the amount of time allotted, then why hasn't the process continued?

    We'll take the supposed ape and human evolution. Where is big foot? This gap is proving to be a major hindrance to you. There is no reasoning behind this at all. Why would you not expect to find every "transition" alive and well, still to this day?

  • @Cootabux Exactly, because you are forcing the interpretation without ever considering the "actual" result that this grandiose evolutionary succession would produce. There are nowhere near as many cross breed animals as we would expect. Nowhere near it!

    I know it is hard to think. It's even harder to think about how we think.

  • I know, you really can't defend yourself against any of this. All you can do is point to the fossils and say "why don't you come to the same conclusion that i do". This is because you really haven't been educated on how reality works and how to think properly. The objects do nothing on their own. It is we who put our interpretation on the objects.You have nothing but another person's word and a memory bank. You have absolutely no independent reasoning on the subject.

  • Now look again at my reasoning. It is flawless and it follows logically from the theory. We'll take another example. The evolution from reptiles to birds. Why would we not expect to find reptiles with wings? For no other reason but because evolution is true and we don't find them, right? How do you not see what you're doing wrong here? This is not how it works. Now every time you look at a "transitional fossil", remember this. There is no reasoning behind the fact that transitions need be sought

  • @knowwaie Even if you point is true (which it isn't). Videos like this explain it far better than your deluded BS.

    Transitional animals are all around us. Kutchicetus role has since been replaced by seals. Here's another one. Whales have hands.

    No one could convince you of evolution. But you are certainly not winning your argument. You are simply making yourself look a prat. Sadly I am too for trying to reason with you.

  • @stufaman See that word you used there? "explain". Why does it need explaining?

    I've been convinced and i came to my senses. No one could convince you that this is entirely invention.

    Go play with your crayons.

  • @stufaman You really don't get it do you? It's so depressing watching people struggle with such a simple concept. Transitions should be VERY common place. You at least know that according to your own rational these animals GRADUALLY changed over MILLIONS of years. So you mean to tell me that they just suddenly died out?

    Just think about it for once in your life. Millions of years, millions of transition. Yet none of them survived. What kind of retarded does one have to be? Tell me.

  • @knowwaie No they didn't suddenly die out (I can't believe I'm trying to reason with him). Here's a modern example. Red squirrels are being phased out by the larger grey squirrels. It's fair to say that's because grey squirrels are better addapted to their surroundings. As it was back then. Rival swimmers simply beat pakicetus to the food. Competition is what makes everything evolve. Even music evolves.

  • @stufaman Holy shit you're dumb. Ok, carry on.

  • @knowwaie I don't have to be intelligent to see 'obnoxious' at it's finest. Please carry on being intelligent by taunting me some more.

  • @stufaman I wasn't lying. you're dumb as a pile of rocks. Nor is it my opinion. Non retarded people can easily see the error in your methodology. Stop responding. You're only proving my point.

  • @knowwaie Um, do you notice what happens to the vast majority of organisms die ... they get eaten!

    The fossilisation process is extremely rare.

  • @Oddessuss The dinosaurs were eaten?... So are you saying that our survival depends on our brutality toward one another?

    Fossils are extremely common.

  • @knowwaie haha if you count all organisms that have ever lived on this planet, indeed fossils are extremely rare. How can you possibly justify that fossils are common?

  • @Oddessuss Based on the words of your own leaders. It's amazing how you lunatics can rationalize contradictions. 

  • @Oddessuss I can't believe i'm even responding to you anymore. It's about as fruitful as talking to a monkey.

    You do realize that there is they thing they call the "geologic column" which contains the supposed "fossil record"? Are you saying this "fossil record" is also very rare?

    This is the last time i respond to you. You're so stupid i wonder how you can put on a shirt without strangling yourself. Never attempt to wear a tie... On second thought, please do.

  • @knowwaie If a stupid moron calls you stupid, does that make you smart hahahaha

  • @Oddessuss What me?

  • « The dinosaurs were eaten? »

    As you will be. By scavengers, and worms, and bacteria, and fungi, and plants.

  • @knowwaie ''Why would we not expect to find reptiles with wings? ''

    We DO, dumb shit. Scientists now have over 20 dinosaurs [reptiles] with feathers.

    Transitional fossils like Microraptor. Bird are reptiles with wings!

  • @gregrutz So where are the living reptiles with feather then?.. You're so fucking dumb you can't even see the point. So you're telling me that reptiles developed feathers before flight. So where are the reptiles with feathers? Not fit enough to survive.

    Holy shit kid. I can't even feel sorry for you. You chose to be cripple.

  • @gregrutz I'll give you the point again. We'll take the platypus for example. This would be the best evidence for the kind of evolution you're claiming, but the LACK of this type of "transition" is, in the end, detrimental to your case.

    I know you're struggling with this. I can't really give examples because i can't invent animals that don't exist. Try to think for yourself, if only this one time. There should be billions of animals just like the platypus, yet there are not.

  • @knowwaie Watch transitional fossils 1 NEW for the evidence you can't seem to find.

    Ther is no CROCODUCK dummy, it would prove evolution wrong, THAT IS HOW FAR FROM REALITY YOUR IDEA OF WHAT EVOLUTION SAYS IS.

  • @gregrutz Holy shit you're dumb.. Are you even trying to think at all? It's really not that difficult.

  • @knowwaie And what is your degree in? You don't even know how evolution works.

    The platypus in is just a mammal that lives today. It is not a missing link or transition to anything dummy.

    ''I can't really give examples because i can't invent animals that don't exist.'' OF COURSE NOT, what you are looking for does not exist because you don't know what you are looking for.

    Every animal that lives today is alive and well and evolving.

  • @gregrutz Now, i understand how you can theorize around this but theories are like assholes, everyone has one. You have no case, no matter how many German scientists of the Third Reich you consult, any sound minded person can see this theory falls short of reality. Not only in practice but in principle.

    Keep your magic beanstalk theory where it belongs, in fairy tale.

  • @knowwaie He is keeping his theory where it belongs. In an evolution vid, comments page. You however don't believe in evolution (fair enough), come here to ridecule all of us who do, then you generally write trash for you own perverse gain. Maybe you should listen to the countless hate comments you recieve. You hideous personality far surpasses your beliefs and intelligence.

    Why not retort to me by saying I'm dumb or maybe gay? You seem to like saying those things to everyone.

  • Comment removed

  • @stufaman My first comment was a rebuttal to the claim in the video. Which, as i understand, i'm free to express. I'd said that the bump mentioned in this video does not have the consistency of bone, and is probably a tumor. I then received a few responses that were typical of drones who have no thought patterns of their own.

    So is that how you want it? You guys stay in your little corner, free from scrutiny, and we'll leave you to play with your dead animals in peace.

  • @knowwaie I credit you for trying to act civil. Yes you are entitled too your opinion as is everyone here on YT. But when you judge people. Be prepared for them to judge you back. That bump turned up on every other specimen they found. Tumour or not, it still lead them to find more of what they wanted. Ironic you say drones with no thought patterns.

    Likewise, I don't believe in religion. But I don't go to Christian specific 'corners' and slagg em off.

  • @knowwaie Two things:

    One Germany has a better education system than America, thus Germans are more intelligent than Americans

    Two The third reich had intelligent Scientists

    So take your religon back to Christian videos, THIS IS NOT FOR YOU

    you have no right to come on here and call this a fairy tale,

    Fucking idiot

    and btw, plz explain to me, what evidence is there a god?, more evidence is in Evolution than Christianty

    please leave now you sorry excuse for a troll

  • @KevinLuhrs Ted Bundy was intelligent. So what's your point?.. Your response is ridiculous. What's wrong with you?

    Coherent thinking is not for you. Do us all a favor, stop ruining the internet with your garbage propaganda videos and watch them in solitude. Fuck yourself while your at it.

  • @knowwaie Ted Bundy got caught because the American police force is the least effective police force in the entire world(Mistake 1) yeah i guess my response is ridiculous, but going on a evolution video and slandering it because your religon is against it? yeah ok that seems to be a bit smarter(Mistake 2), and propaganda? slandering Jews, slandering muslims, slandering military funerals, slandering evolution, and slandering science? i guess that isn't propaganda(Mistake 3)

    GTFO idiot

  • Comment removed

  • @knowwaie and nice job trying to change the subject,

    yup your retarded attempt to change the subject and not noticing flaws in your own argument is enough to render your sorry excuse argument invalid

    get the hell out of here, your too stupid for this video

  • @KevinLuhrs Know what... Lets be serious here. What is the flaw in my argument? Have you understood my argument?

  • @knowwaie Your flaw is coming onto a video, making false points, without knowing facts, not to mention you made 3 shit points

    you sir are a fucking idiot

  • @KevinLuhrs I don't have this name for nothing.

  • @knowwaie It's a YOUTUBE USERNAME

    Knowwaie you are a idiot,

  • @KevinLuhrs "One Germany has a better education system than America, thus Germans are more intelligent than Americans"

    Both are government run social institutions. They teach the same exact things.. You're so retarded i don't even know where to begin.. Or where it will end.

  • @knowwaie first thing: no they don't

    2cd thing: you have never been to germany

    3rd thing: Your retarded, you deny evidence

    4th: go to church where your religon is welcome, let the big boys talk

  • @KevinLuhrs You can't be this dumb... Why would i have to go to Germany to know that school in America teach evolution theory?

    You don't know what the word evidence means. That is a judicial word. In court your claims would be called "circumstantial evidence".

    Learn how to think kid. You're dumb as a rock and you've been so brain washed with propaganda that you can't even think well enough to know that you're not capable of thinking.

  • @KevinLuhrs You can't be this dumb... Why would i have to go to Germany to know that school in America teach evolution theory?

    You don't know what the word evidence means. That is a judicial word. In court your claims would be called "circumstantial evidence".

    Learn how to think kid. You're dumb as a rock and you've been so brain washed with propaganda that you don't even know what it meant to think properly.

  • @knowwaie So where are the living reptiles with feather then?.. They are everywhere dip shit, we call them BIRDS !!

  • @KevinLuhrs "you have no right to come on here and call this a fairy tale"

    It figures you would say this. It's called freedom of speech.... Yeah, i know. You sick fucks don't believe in freedom either...

    So, do you know what's wrong with you? Are you legitimately mentally handicapped?

  • @knowwaie freedom? your retarded if you think freedom of speech gives you freedom

    and your mentally handicapped if you think coming on a video and slandering it is HALF intelligent

  • @KevinLuhrs You really don't get it do you?.. I'll explain it to your dumb ass. It's not that our educational system is doing anything different, it's that the people in our country do not agree with what is being taught. They are saying "grades are falling" not "education is failing"... You no idea what's going on in the real world do you?

  • @KevinLuhrs Not to mention the generation of dumb shits like you who never even attempt to practice independent thought. You'd rather be spoon fed information so you can parrot it back like a brainless drone.

  • @knowwaie So your saying having a spirit is more importent than being intelligent? info is the way to have freedom, but being a idiot is being a brainless drone, so get out of here brainless drone

  • @KevinLuhrs Information is no more intelligence than letters are words.

    Good riddance to your stupidity. I hope you learned something.

  • @knowwaie I really do love you evolution-deniers. You provide a source of unintentional entertainment that I really enjoy. Keep it up.

  • @gingerbreadcorpses What's the world coming to when retardation is the standard and critical thought is rejected. Is that evolution?

  • @knowwaie I'd say critical thought has improved greatly, as evidenced by the increased rejection of religion.

  • @gingerbreadcorpses Case in point. You're demonstrating that you don't know how to think properly.

    There hasn't been an "increased rejection of religion". It has been rejected just the same for the past five thousand years. Atheism has existed, at least, since ancient Greece. Aristotle was not religious. Jesus was killed by people who rejected religion...

    Are you prepared to admit that you're a straight fucking retarded, thoughtless drone? Please? You're only fooling yourself.

  • @knowwaie Atheism has always existed. And now the rate of atheism is increasing. So please tell me what part of that I got wrong.

  • @knowwaie All you prove coming here and mouthing off, is how single minded, vindictive and revolting you are. I think if Jesus met you, he'd say you're an asshole too. Trust me there's nothing to like about you for any religion, faith or walk of life. There's some good Muslim sites here in youtube. Why don't you mouth off to them about your faith? Or do you already?

  • If you're referring to my "swear words". There is no such things as "swear words". They are invented social standards. I wouldn't be surprised if they were eventually passed into law. Among other words. Did you know the name Jesus is censored as a swear word on many cable networks?

    Jesus "mouthed off" at the pharisees. And he used many "strong words"

    You shouldn't incite Jesus against anyone. Even I wouldn't do that.

    I've spoken to many Muslims. American Muslims tend to be very open minded.

  • @knowwaie Listen low life! I refer to how disgusting you are as a person. But as you're trapped inside that ego of yours. You cannot see how revolting your personality is to EVERYONE. Nobody likes you and you work hard at it. You are an insult to your own religion. And I will use Jesus based insults at you while you continue to mouth off about something that doesn't concern you.

    Besides I've nothing against Jesus. He was a bloke of peace. You use him as a wepon.

  • @stufaman You're an idiot. Go tell your congressmen to outlaw theology from all public education and teach only your warped views. How do you not know how this concerns me?

    Jesus was a bloke of peace?.. Then why did he himself say "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword".

    Do you just insist on being wrong about everything, contradicting yourself and being a hypocrite in the process?

  • @knowwaie I must be an idiot. I'm getting nearly as bad as you. I spent ages in a Whale ancestor comments section, asking some religious nutter why he comes to places he doesn't like. If you like Jesus so much go to a Christian site? Or I take it you moan to them too?

    One day something will make you realise how repulsive your personality is. Maybe a family member who can't stand you or something. So far I haven't seen you be civil to anything here.

  • @knowwaie da jews killed jebus man

  • @knowwaie Lol wow? your stupid for denying evidence based on your opinon

    so good riddance to your stupidity, i hope you will enjoy that cock tonight

  • Comment removed

  • @gregrutz They found lizards with a little "fuzz" around them... You shouldn't be calling anyone dumb shit. You'd have to be retarded to not see how that is presumptuous.

    Also, you might want to practice your reading skills. I said "living" animals. Why are these "transitions" dead in the first place? As i had said, there should be millions of these 'hybrids' still living. But you're too fucking stupid to think this through yourself.

  • @knowwaie You don't know how evolution works creatard. Nothing was ever trying to 'transitions' to something else. Every species that ever lived was a complete species. 99% of them are extinct.

  • @gregrutz Why would feathers come before flight? Are you also going to tell me that they developed wings before flight? Do you seriously not know how to think at all? Why are you so retarded? Is it a choice?

    Go ahead. Tell me the great theory of why feathers evolved before flight, and i'll call you a gullible retarded.

  • @knowwaie Why would feathers come before flight? Because birds can't fly without them dummy. Yes, dinosaurs had arms with feathers [wings] before they could fly.

    Are you so stupid that you think they flew before they evolved feathers?

  • @Cootabux I think many people seem to think Pakicetus and it's decendants were around for like two minutes. I also like comparing past fossils with modern replacements. Look at kutchicetus and common seals. It's nice to see some one reasonable here.

  • @stufaman Oh, it's completely reasonable to think and accident is more probable than an action.

    So lets be honest here. You were molested? You were born without an arm? What is it that you hate god so much for that you'd rather delude yourself? Homosexual maybe?.. All of the above?

  • @knowwaie I don't hate god. See god hasn't actually done anything bad to me. But seeing how some people are allowed to behave in god's name kinda puts me off being a strong believer in any religion. I can imagine you screaming at your computer. Stunned why people will not believe the same thing as you. Trust me, you are one of the worst example of any religion. Any person for that matter. I've noticed you are equally angry at gay folk too.

  • Those scientists stupid?

  • Oh dear. Someone's got a screw loose.

  • you know the moderate churches argument is rarely heard. i really feel insulted when i am grouped into the fanatics that practice exorcisms in the church and other nonsense just because i attend church and believe in a creator, why cant evolution and god coexist? god created the universe in 7 days, but how long was a day before there was an earth to turn on its axis in 24 hours? how long is a day to a eternal being? probably a long long time. go ahead guys lemme have it

  • @UniteForgetLeftRight I sorta try to combine the two. My theory is if God controls all, maybe 'he' IS all. If you believe in God, 'he' still has to follow rules. If you are a believer in science you find that everything follows a rule. Regardless what we all believe, wise people can make use of both religion and science.

  • UniteForgetLeftRight

    I don't think anyone wants to "let you have it," as you say. I don't but I would suggest you think about your beliefs more critically. When someone says to me the things you have, I stop them in their tracks and ask them to prove their claims. They cannot, nor can they provide any evidence.

    Can god and Evolution coexist? Sure, and if god is real, then they already do. What can't coexist is the biblical Adam & Eve & Evolution. The two stories conflict.

    We are related to apes

  • My 'beliefs' are extremely thoroughly thought over. All i have to do is mention one word and your case is rendered useless. That word is "interpretation". To an unbiased thinker this idea that life is self existent and self perpetuating is based entirely on circumstantial evidence and any honest judge would rule opposed to it.

    Sure we are "related" to apes. We terrestrial creatures. Does this mean we were born from them? This doesn't follow without added reinterpretation of facts.

  • I agree that when religious people say God is all and science is fake they are stupid however, this doesn't mean it's the other way around. Science can't be 100% right about everything. Nothing can unless someone had lived forever. We simply need to keep an open mind to every possibility.

  • Funny thing is these evolution vids attract more religious attention than a church. Remember not all the religions are right no matter what we believe. So despite our differences, these arguments prove just how stubborn and agressive mankind can be. Besides I shudder to think what would happen if we were all in the same room.

  • Laughable. How do people fall for this? That is a fossilized tumor. It's only found on one side of the skull and the area around it has the consistency of soft tissue.

  • @knowwaie How do we fall for it? That 'ridiculous' find lead on to discovering the remains of the creatures in this vid.

  • Comment removed

  • If you really understood what the theory entails then you would also find this ridiculous. Do you have any idea the amount of distinct fossils we should find? That "bump" is about as telling as a pimple on my ass.

  • @knowwaie Then you have a very shallow perception. Do you tell docters what they're looking for in your body? I doubt it. It's the same here. They know what they're looking for.

  • You're kidding right? You don't even know what the word perception means do you? They don't know what they're looking for and it take perceptive skills to think it through properly. It's as simple as this. At that time there were no such thing as "wolfs". You're so keen at self deception that you actually know this but fail to apply it consistency. You're so mind fucked that you can't even apply the word "evolution" consistently to the "evolution theory"

  • In other words, if we find ancient fossils that are anatomically consistent with modern animals it shows that "evolution" never happened. I'll try to put it in perspective for you. That "bump" which had "evolved" over 'Millions of years', was not, at the time, yet "evolved" to what we see in "modern wolves". Learn how perception works, as i'm sure you really have no clue. Another word you'll always fail to understand is "interpretation".

    

  • @knowwaie Oh go on then. Seeing as you've obviously got it right. Please tell us, National Geographic and everyone else outside your little world what is right.

  • What are you struggling to understand?

  • @knowwaie You seem eager to contradict everyone from professors to athiests. Seeing as you are the only person in your world who is right about anything. Why not correct us? What's should we believe? Or are you just here to satisfy your perverse need to be vindictive?

  • @stufaman As I read it, The information you want, he just gave it to you. He just told you why he disagrees. I agree with him.

  • @givehope2lives He said why he disagrees. I then asked what he DOES believe. I watched this vid because I'm interested in evolution. Many folks come here to disagree and enjoy a good agrument. I am happy to oblige

  • It's impossible to believe something before understanding it.

  • @knowwaie I dunno, it works for many religions who tell young children to believe this. After all Kids grow up believing in the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, Then told about Adam and Eve, God and dinosaurs.

  • The irony is the tooth fairy, santa claus and easter bunny were invented by atheists. Maybe they were past "predictions" of evolutionary scientists?

  • @knowwaie The point is Children are are led to believe all sorts of myths. To them religion might not seem all that different. Lets get back to the source of our subject. You believe what you like. But when you moan about it here, I will moan back. Most folks will not believe you and never will. Go preach to folks who care.

  • Children are not lead to believe anything. Did you ever REALLY believe in Santa Claus or the Tooth fairy? I know i didn't. Though my parents never bullshit me. On Christmas i was given gifts directly from people. So i honestly don't know how exactly you heathen perceived it. It seems to me Children do not even have the capacity to believe anything.

    I'm not here to preach. I'm here to ridicule you morons. You should have foreseen this when you ventured out of your expertise in beastiality.

  • @knowwaie Tooth fairy wasn't big over here. But it took me a while to figure out Santa was a bishop from eons ago. And his story got twisted A LOT over time to get kids to behave themselves. A bit like the bible really. No offence to decent religious folk.

    I like rideculing morons too. But I just wait for them to come to sights they don't agree with. It seems you do that a lot.

  • @knowwaie good point, apply that to your lack of understanding of science, you hypocrite moron.

  • knowwaie

    Yes, Christians understand interpretation very well. They each have their own unique interpretation when it comes to scripture & each believes their interpretation is correct, while others are wrong! That's why there are now 38,000 Christian denominations worldwide!!

    Why so many? It demonstrates how massively confused they are in their interpretations. Thats's really easy to understand when u have so many bible books, written by so many authors, & the kicker is, no god was involved.

  • @Cootabux Do you have any idea what you're talking about? First of all, exaggerations never go unnoticed. Theses supposed "38,000 denominations" is an extreme exaggeration and the fact that you're saying it show you have absolutely no idea what any of them claim. In reality there are roughly four general interpretations and thousands of churches.

    This is like saying there are millions of different interpretations of math because there are different independent schools teaching it.

  • @knowwaie I must have him a million times, don't exaggerate.

  • Is it bad that i have absolutely no sympathy for these people? I once did. But now i understand that hell is completely justifiable judging by their completely lack of astuteness on subjects they purport to be experts.

    This imbecile speaks as if he knows the subject well but his ignorance is beyond childish. Maybe he is legitimately mentally handicapped.. Perhaps i should be a little more considerate.

  • @knowwaie hahahaha you scientific illiterate moron, go on now, back to your church and your god, have a ball with your talking snake, fallen world and the other dessert fairy tales that make up your superstitious bullshit.

  • @Biankito "you scientific illiterate"

    Repeating meaningless phrases only exposes your parrot mentality. You have no idea what science is, nor what it means to be scientifically 'perceptive'. Clearly, science is not a field of linguistics, nor is it a piece of literature. In reality, you're accusing me of not accepting your "doctrines". You'd have to be truly ignorant, even of language, to not see the fault in what you're saying.

    Learn word definition.

  • @knowwaie trolling for jesus.

    Of course I know its not a field of linguistics you idiot, its a metaphor to your lack of understand of the basics of science.

    And yes, I do know more about science than you do, there is no doctrines, no "holy" book passed down by the generations with nothing but bullshit made up stories to explain natural occurrences because people lacked the understanding of the world around them, so they had to make up shit to explain them.

    Btw, no one takes you seriously.

  • You have no idea what you're talking about. I can't believe you take yourself seriously. You at least know that science is not a set of opinions, as you have been lead to believe. Peer reviewed journals are your holy book.

    If people in the past lacked understanding of the world then they would have never known. The idea that they invented ideas to cover something that they didn't know is foreign to human nature. Ignorance breeds ignorance and nothing more. This is science.

  • If you don't understand what was said below then you are not only ignorant of science but far worse.

    This idea that you parrot, without ever thinking about, is ridiculously absurd and contrary to what our sciences know about our minds. What part of our neurology is responsible for this then? Our brain controls our body and our senses. Which of their senses was responsible for conjuring the inconceivable to explain the inconceivable?

    Be smarter. Please.

  • @Biankito I don't take him seriously. It's just hilarious winding him up. Mind you looking at his history I think he gets wound up all by himself. Use him as an example to feel better about yourself.