Of course they don't plot and they don't conive because they are animals and they don't have the brains to be so devious, but they do kill each other because that's an animal instinct, but if they ever had brains like humans they would do the same shit to each we do. As been stated real life ain't like Walt Disney.
we evolved to eat animal protein and plants/ herbs etc- we are opportunistic feeders- it is not morally wrong to kill and eat animals- it is however wrong to raise and slaughter these animals in a factory type setting where they cannot move about freely and be fed natural diets-
What is this animals are kind and good and animal if provoked even if unprovoked will attack you and many forget humans are animals and we have similar instincts there for we both have the urge and need to kill.
Our pets especially our dogs. Can form very strong bonds. They feel, they love, they protectm and keep us company. BUT!! Many of the Animals rights activist today. have learned that there is a lot of money involved through sympathetic donations. Because of these we have Animal Rights activism that has gone over board. They are wrongly Generalizing entire groups as Animal abusers and causing witch hunts and lynch mobs. This harms both humans and animals. Because it forces an extreme division.
Two years ago I had to necropsy two dogs when their lonely, friend and family lacking owner's body took a while to be reported.
According to my necropsy, verified by two other parties, it only took the dog's 3-4 days, after exhausting their primary food source, to start chowing down on their owner.
I have more pets than the average person needs, but I am painfully aware that the only thing that keeps me from being that secondary food source is that fact that I keep their food dishes full.
Why would a biologist expect the animals that she is performing the necropsy on to do anything other than what's in their nature?
I do agree with the second part of your comment, though:
*shudder*
It's terrifying to think that our species is becoming so disassociated from each other that something like that could happen. Even when ancient tribes put those dying of highly contagious diseases away from the tribe proper they still knew where they were.
i would not expect anything less from a biologist. (shoulda known you were smart from the necropsy part lol/ jk)
But would you not agree with me that some animals (especially dogs) can grow a bond with humans that goes beyond the 'food bowl'. I mean if this happened outside (im guessing it happened inside) the dogs would have probably stayed with the body for a long time and then, when hunger finally struck, moved on.
It is the 'last resort' so to say to start chowing down on members of the pack/group/family (or am i completely wrong about this).
And about the subject of disassociation, have you heard about the Korean couple? I think it's just a sign of the times. People are to busy with themselves.
Buddhism condemns practically everything technological. According to Siddhartha everyone's supposed to live poor, destitute lives with none of the benefits of modern society. Too many new-age westerners fancy themselves as Buddhists these days. It's fucking laughable.
If you actually want useful Eastern philosophy then study Confucianism or the Taoist tradition. Lao Tzu, Sun Tzu and Confucius all put to shame any of the squalid doctrines produced by Buddha.
I find it very amusing to hear people talk about how kind and unselfish and good. These people obviously have never seen how animals really act in the wild. They are mean, self-serving, ruthless, dare I say it, animals. It is laughable!
@L1A1Rocker animals are also mothers and fathers, they gather food for their young, cuddle with their mates, communicate with eachother and are a part of the natural world-just as we are. Humans are no better then animals, we just have a advantage to survive longer. Learn Biology, we are all connected.
Seriously? You really need to learn something about nature. It is a tough cruel place. Have you ever watched deer? They are some of the meanest animals out there - even to their young. You really do need to educate yourself on these things. LOL
@crabfishlion Really? Have you EVER seen a "father" deer comfort his offspring? No? Care to guess why? Cause he hit the road looking for another peace of. . . Ever seen a momma deer comfort her sartled baby? Why? Cause she took off running in the a different direction than the baby. Or maybe watched a momma kick her baby away from he food so she can eat her fill first? Really, you MAY know about biology but you are seriously lacking in animal and human behavior.
This hypocrical,self-deceptive, shallow-minded fool should not take a painkiller is she has a headache, not take a flu med if she has a cold, she should not take anti-biotic is she suffers infection. She should not take anaethesia when go for tooth extraction. She cannot go for an operation if she needs one. She cannot take stitches if she suffers a cut because stitching an open wound has been tested on animals. All these animals testings have saved mankind's lives. Hypocrite!
@Buguanshishi Hmm, to follow your logic, I guess vegans/animal rights activists are not allowed to drink water, as that's been tested on animals. Seems to me water was around a long time before sadists decided to inflict cruelty on animals with it...
Just because a drug has been tested on animals, doesn't mean animal testing has had anything whatsoever to do with its development.
Animal rightist are shameless, thick-skinned hypocrites. All medicines, esp painkillers has been tested on animals. These include med for flu, cough, skin rashes, all other common illness. Antibiotic has been tested on animals.Anaethesia, even those used in dental treatment has been tested on animals. All surgeries, such as organ transplant and heart pass-by, have been tested on animals. All medical achievement that has saved man's lives have been tested on animals.
In college I was dating a girl who was kind of granola. That was ok by me, but I really had no idea what kind of a nut-job she was until she tried to recruit me for the ALFies.
They were planning a raid on our college (hello! physics major here... premed! We KNOW how important animal testing is). I played along and reported their plans to the administration.
6 students expelled, 4 prosecuted for breaking and entering. Upgraded girlfriends.
thats like the us goverment captured is not asscociated with a captured cia operative but then paying mas money for the dudes legal fee's
ROFLFLMAO no but alf members who get Arrested as terrorists by the way fuck everything call them unlawfull combatants and send them where you send people who you never want to be seen again terrorist tentiontion land but yeah any any they give loans to convicted ALF terrorists they "understant terrorism" for the animal cause yeah they not only accociated
I've seen elephants kill rinos over a puddle of water, I've seen wild cats kill rodents for fun, I've seen marine mammals murder each other. Unselfish? Good? Bullcrap. Nature has solved its problems by using violence since life began.
Can you show me some of those videos? They sound pretty crazy.
I've seen cats kill little lizards and rodents, though. I really don't get it. Some of them are psychopaths.
The "puddle of water" that you refer to, I think you are talking about survival. And marine mammals murdering each other, I'd have to see it to know why.
There are some cases where fishermen kill young marine mammals' parents and this makes them crazy and/or violent (like it can do to human children).
peta doesn't go after hunting camps and farmers they go after collage's
why you ask
cause hunters and farmers have guns i have said i hunt and if any ALF pussy wants to stop me to come do so to throw paint at me while i am walking through the woods with a device in my hands that can put holes in an armoured car that it's barrels diamiture is messured buy the weight of a lead sphear
the alf will never go after me cause they know i will kill then to protect my self
let them try if they think hunting is "wrong" then they should come after me animal rights we still have serious human right violations that happen every day it's a little pretentious and down right discusting to go we have have to stop the "chicken holocaust" um we kill ckickens for a reasion theyre get this food
hahaha I understand what you're saying. From what I've seen though, ALF goes after big companies. Do you have any pets? ALF basically cares about all animals as much as you care about your pet (if you have one).
They are interested in going after large-scale operations, because these cause the most injury to the animals they love.
Also note that these celebs are talking about PETA, not ALF. PETA is not assoc. with ALF.
animal rights...give me a break! Anyone that supports animal rights knows little about animals and nature. I am a hunter, I respect the animal I hunt. But I am labeled as a murderer and a cruel person. The hunter and the hunted form a bond and respect for each other that others (like yourselves) know little about. The food chain is a cycle, and no matter how that animal dies (be it from my rifle or the cold winter day) the same outcome will result.
Respect? What. Why on earth would the animal respect you when you are going to murder it. Would you respect someone that has a gun pointed at you? Furthermore, it takes a big man to run around with its gun shooting defenseless animals. Keep trying to justify what you do (in the cold winter day) is right.
what do "nature," "the food chain," and "respect" have to do with using a rifle & scope, camouflage, animal call mimicking devices, GPS, pheromones...?
You can lie to yourself, but other people will call you on it if you try to lie to them.
And I don't know whether you are a cruel person, but if you kill an animal, you are a killer. This is an objective statement. Being a killer is defined by killing, which you do.
Well, first off, not every hunter carries what you list, in fact, little do. Rifle and Scope? Sorry, not everyone uses a scope either (I don't). There is this respect for nature and animal that hunters share above other people. We are part of a tradition that cherishes everything that we get from killing an animal (meat, fur, experience). I guess we are still humble about our food...we understand the responsibility of taking a life for food and clothing. I am a killer, I'm not a murderer though.
Fake hunters don't need to "cherish" anything from their killing sprees. Nobody needs to eat , wear or exploit animals in any way. Hunting like bullfighting is a tradition that must be stamped out. Humans have caused havoc and total inbalance in nature. These fake hunters encourage overpopulation of some species just to satisfy their bloodthirsty antics.
The only difference between "killer" and "murderer" is from what species you take life. You will still look like a psycho to me when you shoot an animal's mother and cut her open.
And if I killed you and made good use of all your body parts, possessions and money, that WOULD NOT JUSTIFY THE KILL.
And respect does not equal "kill." I can imagine you saying "I really like this new country album. In order to show the artist respect, I think I will go kill him."
@joshuak47 okay. well tell me this. deer are extremely overpopulated. know why? human corn,bean,soy, etc fields. wanna know how they keep from starving to death? hunters. eat shit peta fucker
Unless one is Ted Kaczynski, hold up in a cabin in the woods of Montana evading the FBI for a decade, one need not stalk, trap and kill animals in the wild for sustenance.
Most folks, those who don't take perverse pleasure in hunting that is, when hungry, will visit the market.
You kill on purpose, but you don't like the idea of being called a murderer. Tough. I kill baby roaches every night. I'm a murderer of roach hatchlings. It's pretty sad when people can't take responsibility for their actions, or try to use funny language to make themselves guiltless. Doesn't work in reality, what was taken cannot be restored, you have to bear the burden of your own convictions. Stop trying to disguise or cover-up what you're doing, it's pathetic.
I don't think the type of weapon is a factor (e.g. rifle, antlers, beak, etc.) it is only that we(the animal and human) have to rely on these tools to live. You make the same misinformed and biased comments like many others. "Big gun" and "Defenseless animals"? Ugh! Animals are not even close to defenseless, if you can even find them in the first place. By cold winter day, I mean if I don't shoot a deer (for example) it will have to survive a cruel winter, there are hunting seasons you know.
So does that mean that if I shot you to death, I would save you from having to suffer from heart disease or cancer? NO. Well, if my mindset was warped yes. You are essentially ending another's life. Don't pretend that you are doing it a favor. If the deer wanted to die, she would have died already.
Here are just a few resources with information (note that one is a reference to a U.N. report) on the fact that raising animals for food does indeed have a negative impact on the environment.
You might want to remember that generations ago, the population of people and demand for meat wasn't nearly as high as it is today -- notice we are one of the fattest nations in the world thanks to those "healthful" and "nutritious" cheeseburgers people consume in place for actual food.
The vegetarian diet is best for the animals, our health, the environment, and our souls. The answer to the significant problems we are being plagued with today is simple: compassion.
Also, it is prudent to mention that the animals raised for food drink and eat, which means that wasted resources of water and grain are used to fatten them. It's the same as tossing 16 plates of pasta into the garbage just to eat one plate of food. Many impoverished countries would have enough food to feed starving people if they would eat the grain they use to feed livestock.
Due to large demands for meat, the family farms that exist presently either have to raise large numbers of animals (which means more land is needed for grazing), or sell out to the big business-operated factory farms that don't use much land since the animals are crammed into warehouses, but the flaw here is the excess Co 2 emissions that come from accumulated manure, and not to forget the extreme cruelty to the animals.
You might want to remember that generations ago, the population of people and demand for meat wasn't nearly as high as it is today -- notice we are one of the fattest nations in the world thanks to those "healthful" and "nutritious" cheeseburgers people consume in place for actual food.
I'm glad that there's celebs that are aware of these terrible issues. And what Jorja Fox said, I agree!! Animals will give back more than you would ever imagine; that's why their suffering hurts me.
Actually, by eating meat, you are contributing to deforestation that is done to make grazing land for cattle. Try doing some educated research before making idiotic claims.
Thats not true at all. The majority of the meat we get doesn't come from farm land that was deforested, it comes from ranches that have been around for generations like Harris Ranch. And thanks to people like Teddy Roosevelt we have a lot more forests today than we did 100 years ago when logged wasn't regulated.
Of course they don't plot and they don't conive because they are animals and they don't have the brains to be so devious, but they do kill each other because that's an animal instinct, but if they ever had brains like humans they would do the same shit to each we do. As been stated real life ain't like Walt Disney.
flootisboy65 6 months ago
we evolved to eat animal protein and plants/ herbs etc- we are opportunistic feeders- it is not morally wrong to kill and eat animals- it is however wrong to raise and slaughter these animals in a factory type setting where they cannot move about freely and be fed natural diets-
Beanmaster73 1 year ago
What is this animals are kind and good and animal if provoked even if unprovoked will attack you and many forget humans are animals and we have similar instincts there for we both have the urge and need to kill.
xXSPOILERALERTXx 1 year ago
Our pets especially our dogs. Can form very strong bonds. They feel, they love, they protectm and keep us company. BUT!! Many of the Animals rights activist today. have learned that there is a lot of money involved through sympathetic donations. Because of these we have Animal Rights activism that has gone over board. They are wrongly Generalizing entire groups as Animal abusers and causing witch hunts and lynch mobs. This harms both humans and animals. Because it forces an extreme division.
babbrookkennel 1 year ago
Two years ago I had to necropsy two dogs when their lonely, friend and family lacking owner's body took a while to be reported.
According to my necropsy, verified by two other parties, it only took the dog's 3-4 days, after exhausting their primary food source, to start chowing down on their owner.
I have more pets than the average person needs, but I am painfully aware that the only thing that keeps me from being that secondary food source is that fact that I keep their food dishes full.
thegirl44 2 years ago
@thegirl44 what did you expect. that the dogs would not eat and die along with the owner. Humans do exactlythe same (remember the movie 'alive')
What is worrying though is that someone lays dead and rotting for days,weeks or even months with nobody noticing.
Flimpofloempieflomp 2 years ago
@Flimpofloempieflomp
Why would a biologist expect the animals that she is performing the necropsy on to do anything other than what's in their nature?
I do agree with the second part of your comment, though:
*shudder*
It's terrifying to think that our species is becoming so disassociated from each other that something like that could happen. Even when ancient tribes put those dying of highly contagious diseases away from the tribe proper they still knew where they were.
thegirl44 2 years ago
i would not expect anything less from a biologist. (shoulda known you were smart from the necropsy part lol/ jk)
But would you not agree with me that some animals (especially dogs) can grow a bond with humans that goes beyond the 'food bowl'. I mean if this happened outside (im guessing it happened inside) the dogs would have probably stayed with the body for a long time and then, when hunger finally struck, moved on.
Flimpofloempieflomp 1 year ago
It is the 'last resort' so to say to start chowing down on members of the pack/group/family (or am i completely wrong about this).
And about the subject of disassociation, have you heard about the Korean couple? I think it's just a sign of the times. People are to busy with themselves.
Flimpofloempieflomp 1 year ago
And I give a shit what some Hollywood fuck thinks. If California would drop off into the ocean the world would be a better place.
triponmsn 2 years ago
HUMANS FIRST
7CATALYST25 2 years ago 3
Buddhism condemns practically everything technological. According to Siddhartha everyone's supposed to live poor, destitute lives with none of the benefits of modern society. Too many new-age westerners fancy themselves as Buddhists these days. It's fucking laughable.
If you actually want useful Eastern philosophy then study Confucianism or the Taoist tradition. Lao Tzu, Sun Tzu and Confucius all put to shame any of the squalid doctrines produced by Buddha.
LlortnA 2 years ago
I find it very amusing to hear people talk about how kind and unselfish and good. These people obviously have never seen how animals really act in the wild. They are mean, self-serving, ruthless, dare I say it, animals. It is laughable!
L1A1Rocker 2 years ago 4
@L1A1Rocker animals are also mothers and fathers, they gather food for their young, cuddle with their mates, communicate with eachother and are a part of the natural world-just as we are. Humans are no better then animals, we just have a advantage to survive longer. Learn Biology, we are all connected.
crabfishlion 2 years ago
Seriously? You really need to learn something about nature. It is a tough cruel place. Have you ever watched deer? They are some of the meanest animals out there - even to their young. You really do need to educate yourself on these things. LOL
L1A1Rocker 2 years ago
@crabfishlion Really? Have you EVER seen a "father" deer comfort his offspring? No? Care to guess why? Cause he hit the road looking for another peace of. . . Ever seen a momma deer comfort her sartled baby? Why? Cause she took off running in the a different direction than the baby. Or maybe watched a momma kick her baby away from he food so she can eat her fill first? Really, you MAY know about biology but you are seriously lacking in animal and human behavior.
L1A1Rocker 1 year ago 2
@L1A1Rocker Right on.
Zachrys 1 year ago
dot com
74011cwby 3 years ago
kills animals
74011cwby 3 years ago
peta
74011cwby 3 years ago
stop worrying about animals they don't decide our fate. We have to worry about ourselves destroying ourselves with war
eric88eric88 3 years ago
Jesus ate meat so, I don't think eating meat is an evil thing.
mythoughtsfortoday 3 years ago 2
mythoughtsfortoday, in that measure, Buddha condemned meat-eating so, I think eating meat is an evil thing.
Why am I saying this? I don't condemn Jesus.
But sometimes, invoking the religious argument is totally unnecessary.
christaykendra 3 years ago
yes, but Buddha wasn't the truth... I am not condemning you for being a Buddhist, but he wasn't the truth.
mythoughtsfortoday 3 years ago 4
This hypocrical,self-deceptive, shallow-minded fool should not take a painkiller is she has a headache, not take a flu med if she has a cold, she should not take anti-biotic is she suffers infection. She should not take anaethesia when go for tooth extraction. She cannot go for an operation if she needs one. She cannot take stitches if she suffers a cut because stitching an open wound has been tested on animals. All these animals testings have saved mankind's lives. Hypocrite!
Buguanshishi 3 years ago 6
Bravo!, I couldn't of said it better!
dvdfiend 2 years ago
@Buguanshishi Hmm, to follow your logic, I guess vegans/animal rights activists are not allowed to drink water, as that's been tested on animals. Seems to me water was around a long time before sadists decided to inflict cruelty on animals with it...
Just because a drug has been tested on animals, doesn't mean animal testing has had anything whatsoever to do with its development.
kimberlily1983 1 year ago
Animal rightist are shameless, thick-skinned hypocrites. All medicines, esp painkillers has been tested on animals. These include med for flu, cough, skin rashes, all other common illness. Antibiotic has been tested on animals.Anaethesia, even those used in dental treatment has been tested on animals. All surgeries, such as organ transplant and heart pass-by, have been tested on animals. All medical achievement that has saved man's lives have been tested on animals.
Buguanshishi 3 years ago 3
Jeez...You'd think that celebrities would be smart enough to know what really goes into what their supporting
ArikaCullen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In college I was dating a girl who was kind of granola. That was ok by me, but I really had no idea what kind of a nut-job she was until she tried to recruit me for the ALFies.
They were planning a raid on our college (hello! physics major here... premed! We KNOW how important animal testing is). I played along and reported their plans to the administration.
6 students expelled, 4 prosecuted for breaking and entering. Upgraded girlfriends.
Flawless victory.
conotoxin 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok, so why now do animals have more rights than human beings. Idiotic Hollywood liberals
mp5guy101 3 years ago
We should start a radical veganofascists terrorist group named HUMMUS!!! Ok just kidding, seriously though GO VEG!
UcanbeGOD 3 years ago 5
thats like the us goverment captured is not asscociated with a captured cia operative but then paying mas money for the dudes legal fee's
ROFLFLMAO no but alf members who get Arrested as terrorists by the way fuck everything call them unlawfull combatants and send them where you send people who you never want to be seen again terrorist tentiontion land but yeah any any they give loans to convicted ALF terrorists they "understant terrorism" for the animal cause yeah they not only accociated
AlderTheKitty 3 years ago
Fuck the animals
cookiesandcartoons 3 years ago
cookiesandcartoons:
it must be lonely out in the countryside if you have to resort to bestiality
joshuak47 3 years ago
It really is. Thanks for understanding. The world needs more people like you.
cookiesandcartoons 3 years ago
I've seen elephants kill rinos over a puddle of water, I've seen wild cats kill rodents for fun, I've seen marine mammals murder each other. Unselfish? Good? Bullcrap. Nature has solved its problems by using violence since life began.
just2w4tch 4 years ago
just2w4tch:
Can you show me some of those videos? They sound pretty crazy.
I've seen cats kill little lizards and rodents, though. I really don't get it. Some of them are psychopaths.
The "puddle of water" that you refer to, I think you are talking about survival. And marine mammals murdering each other, I'd have to see it to know why.
There are some cases where fishermen kill young marine mammals' parents and this makes them crazy and/or violent (like it can do to human children).
joshuak47 3 years ago
peta doesn't go after hunting camps and farmers they go after collage's
why you ask
cause hunters and farmers have guns i have said i hunt and if any ALF pussy wants to stop me to come do so to throw paint at me while i am walking through the woods with a device in my hands that can put holes in an armoured car that it's barrels diamiture is messured buy the weight of a lead sphear
the alf will never go after me cause they know i will kill then to protect my self
so come on pussy's
AlderTheKitty 4 years ago
AlderTheKitty:
ALF does go after farms sometimes (mink farms, for example)... but why would ALF want to attack you? Are you doing something cruel to animals?
I agree with you that we should fight to stay alive. I don't think ALF will try to kill you, though.
joshuak47 3 years ago
let them try if they think hunting is "wrong" then they should come after me animal rights we still have serious human right violations that happen every day it's a little pretentious and down right discusting to go we have have to stop the "chicken holocaust" um we kill ckickens for a reasion theyre get this food
AlderTheKitty 3 years ago
AlderTheKitty:
hahaha I understand what you're saying. From what I've seen though, ALF goes after big companies. Do you have any pets? ALF basically cares about all animals as much as you care about your pet (if you have one).
They are interested in going after large-scale operations, because these cause the most injury to the animals they love.
Also note that these celebs are talking about PETA, not ALF. PETA is not assoc. with ALF.
joshuak47 3 years ago
animal rights...give me a break! Anyone that supports animal rights knows little about animals and nature. I am a hunter, I respect the animal I hunt. But I am labeled as a murderer and a cruel person. The hunter and the hunted form a bond and respect for each other that others (like yourselves) know little about. The food chain is a cycle, and no matter how that animal dies (be it from my rifle or the cold winter day) the same outcome will result.
LetPetaBurn 4 years ago
Respect? What. Why on earth would the animal respect you when you are going to murder it. Would you respect someone that has a gun pointed at you? Furthermore, it takes a big man to run around with its gun shooting defenseless animals. Keep trying to justify what you do (in the cold winter day) is right.
Pennylane875 3 years ago
LetPetaBurn:
what do "nature," "the food chain," and "respect" have to do with using a rifle & scope, camouflage, animal call mimicking devices, GPS, pheromones...?
You can lie to yourself, but other people will call you on it if you try to lie to them.
And I don't know whether you are a cruel person, but if you kill an animal, you are a killer. This is an objective statement. Being a killer is defined by killing, which you do.
joshuak47 3 years ago
Well, first off, not every hunter carries what you list, in fact, little do. Rifle and Scope? Sorry, not everyone uses a scope either (I don't). There is this respect for nature and animal that hunters share above other people. We are part of a tradition that cherishes everything that we get from killing an animal (meat, fur, experience). I guess we are still humble about our food...we understand the responsibility of taking a life for food and clothing. I am a killer, I'm not a murderer though.
LetPetaBurn 3 years ago
Fake hunters don't need to "cherish" anything from their killing sprees. Nobody needs to eat , wear or exploit animals in any way. Hunting like bullfighting is a tradition that must be stamped out. Humans have caused havoc and total inbalance in nature. These fake hunters encourage overpopulation of some species just to satisfy their bloodthirsty antics.
GUMMERUP 3 years ago 4
LetPetaBurn:
The only difference between "killer" and "murderer" is from what species you take life. You will still look like a psycho to me when you shoot an animal's mother and cut her open.
And if I killed you and made good use of all your body parts, possessions and money, that WOULD NOT JUSTIFY THE KILL.
And respect does not equal "kill." I can imagine you saying "I really like this new country album. In order to show the artist respect, I think I will go kill him."
joshuak47 3 years ago 9
@joshuak47 okay. well tell me this. deer are extremely overpopulated. know why? human corn,bean,soy, etc fields. wanna know how they keep from starving to death? hunters. eat shit peta fucker
jumpthenoob 9 months ago
@jumpthenoob
If you don't have an argument, feel free to keep quiet instead of showing rage and looking like a silly man.
joshuak47 9 months ago
Unless one is Ted Kaczynski, hold up in a cabin in the woods of Montana evading the FBI for a decade, one need not stalk, trap and kill animals in the wild for sustenance.
Most folks, those who don't take perverse pleasure in hunting that is, when hungry, will visit the market.
Society is progressive like that, letburn.
CDLver 3 years ago 3
It's high arrogance to assert that mother nature needs YOU, a self-professed sportsman,
to maintain the natural order, letburn.
It must have been utter chaos in the WILD until you showed up with a loaded gun of testosterone to sort things out, huh?
CDLver 3 years ago 4
You kill on purpose, but you don't like the idea of being called a murderer. Tough. I kill baby roaches every night. I'm a murderer of roach hatchlings. It's pretty sad when people can't take responsibility for their actions, or try to use funny language to make themselves guiltless. Doesn't work in reality, what was taken cannot be restored, you have to bear the burden of your own convictions. Stop trying to disguise or cover-up what you're doing, it's pathetic.
SleepySkeptic 3 years ago
I don't think the type of weapon is a factor (e.g. rifle, antlers, beak, etc.) it is only that we(the animal and human) have to rely on these tools to live. You make the same misinformed and biased comments like many others. "Big gun" and "Defenseless animals"? Ugh! Animals are not even close to defenseless, if you can even find them in the first place. By cold winter day, I mean if I don't shoot a deer (for example) it will have to survive a cruel winter, there are hunting seasons you know.
LetPetaBurn 3 years ago
LetPetaBurn:
So does that mean that if I shot you to death, I would save you from having to suffer from heart disease or cancer? NO. Well, if my mindset was warped yes. You are essentially ending another's life. Don't pretend that you are doing it a favor. If the deer wanted to die, she would have died already.
joshuak47 3 years ago 2
Amen Ben Stein!
Vanessas1969 4 years ago
Meat is harmful to the planet (it took me a while to figure out how to post a link on YouTube's ridiculously strict comments page):
commondreams (DOT) org/archive/2007/09/22/4022/
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago 2
God didn't just put animals on the earth just to treat them as pets.
mscubana 4 years ago
look he was just here and he told me he doesnt even like you and he's just using you for a ride to work
wingedkuriboh23 4 years ago
Here are just a few resources with information (note that one is a reference to a U.N. report) on the fact that raising animals for food does indeed have a negative impact on the environment.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago 3
You might want to remember that generations ago, the population of people and demand for meat wasn't nearly as high as it is today -- notice we are one of the fattest nations in the world thanks to those "healthful" and "nutritious" cheeseburgers people consume in place for actual food.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago
just wanted to add there that over 300,000 chickens are murdered a day in america alone...
this number is more then america use to kill in a whole year back in the 70s etc
bane39 4 years ago 2
The vegetarian diet is best for the animals, our health, the environment, and our souls. The answer to the significant problems we are being plagued with today is simple: compassion.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago 3
Also, it is prudent to mention that the animals raised for food drink and eat, which means that wasted resources of water and grain are used to fatten them. It's the same as tossing 16 plates of pasta into the garbage just to eat one plate of food. Many impoverished countries would have enough food to feed starving people if they would eat the grain they use to feed livestock.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago 3
Due to large demands for meat, the family farms that exist presently either have to raise large numbers of animals (which means more land is needed for grazing), or sell out to the big business-operated factory farms that don't use much land since the animals are crammed into warehouses, but the flaw here is the excess Co 2 emissions that come from accumulated manure, and not to forget the extreme cruelty to the animals.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago 2
You might want to remember that generations ago, the population of people and demand for meat wasn't nearly as high as it is today -- notice we are one of the fattest nations in the world thanks to those "healthful" and "nutritious" cheeseburgers people consume in place for actual food.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago
eat meat and you will kill a animal and a tree
Evilkaneheights 4 years ago
Ok I'm gonna boycott these celebs' films.
TheChaotician 4 years ago
Pleasae help me I m french, I speak english but they all talk too fast !! Can you explain to me if all those people are for animal rights ?
Go vegan !!
mellisassas 4 years ago
Yes. They are for animal rights.
SuperGZK 4 years ago
I'm glad that there's celebs that are aware of these terrible issues. And what Jorja Fox said, I agree!! Animals will give back more than you would ever imagine; that's why their suffering hurts me.
milkandpepsi85 4 years ago
Actually, by eating meat, you are contributing to deforestation that is done to make grazing land for cattle. Try doing some educated research before making idiotic claims.
TheUnsilenced 4 years ago
Thats not true at all. The majority of the meat we get doesn't come from farm land that was deforested, it comes from ranches that have been around for generations like Harris Ranch. And thanks to people like Teddy Roosevelt we have a lot more forests today than we did 100 years ago when logged wasn't regulated.
beforetheendoftime 4 years ago
Eat Meat and save a tree.
smrairborne 5 years ago