Load of crap. Tests can always be skewed in anyones favor and the 'competitor' held up the same, the glass failed. Did the chip the edge to cause it???
It's not about glass breaking, it's about one film melted before the other film's adhesive failed. Even though the one that melted at a lower temperature claims their adhesive handles higher heat.
Thats still funny, One failed at the high 700s the other 824. No film will ever reach 25 - 30 % of that, so the only thing that was proven was that in a test under non-controlled variables, one falied before the other. Run 100 tests in a controlled environvent (lab) they may come out totally different
IM RICK JAMES BICH!~!!
1peecbaretta 2 years ago
@1peecbaretta
I concur
sduquette2 1 year ago
Load of crap. Tests can always be skewed in anyones favor and the 'competitor' held up the same, the glass failed. Did the chip the edge to cause it???
customtint 3 years ago
It's not about glass breaking, it's about one film melted before the other film's adhesive failed. Even though the one that melted at a lower temperature claims their adhesive handles higher heat.
darkestofdans 3 years ago
Thats still funny, One failed at the high 700s the other 824. No film will ever reach 25 - 30 % of that, so the only thing that was proven was that in a test under non-controlled variables, one falied before the other. Run 100 tests in a controlled environvent (lab) they may come out totally different
customtint 3 years ago
SPAY SOME WATER ON IT AND WATCH IT BREAK
mytints 4 years ago