dam bro i love all the shit you do . heard it on gnostic media. however you should forreals consider shaving your mustache haha so people don't see you as some crazy dude with a creeper stache.
Subbed! Love your stuff - clear and direct, best I've seen on this topic so far.
Only problem is, I can't for the LIFE of me find a way to get a hold of 'The Most Dangerous Superstition' here in the UK, not even through common online retailers it seems! I checked your site, but I still got the impression that shipping didn't apply to international orders.
Is there any chance at all that I can arrange to have a custom order made, to cover the necessary oversees shipping costs in my case?
According to the New York Times article titled "Fed Turns Over $77 Billion in Profits to the Treasury", the Fed is "required by law to turn over its profits to the Treasury each year". Doesn't that mean that any interest paid toward loans from the Fed go back to the US Treasury, and the Fed is simply doing the work of creating and loaning money for the US treasury?
@changeyournode No, it means the New York Times is a completely worthless collection of collectivist bullpoop with no connection to reality. The "profits" mentioned are nothing compared to the FABRICATED wealth, in the trillions, that enrich the banks and enslave everyone else. The story was printed for one purpose: to confuse people into thinking what you just said--that the Fed doesn't get any wealth from the arrangement. Utter and complete BS.
@changeyournode It's sort of true but disingenuous - since the loan has no legitimate purpose in the first place. And they keep 10% of the profits... from a system that is essentially fraud. Even if they kept only 0.001%, it's still fraud and would still be billions and billions of dollars. I hope that helps. Thanks!
@jewNoseBook The only reason I'm not removing your comment is because I think it's important for people to know the moronic opinions that are out there. So thanks for being so "informative," and making your idiotic voice heard.
@LarkenRose Exactly my point. The "crooks" at congress would forever print "counterfeit" money without our knowledge, if they had that power, and the only visibility we would have of it is the devaluation of our currency. The way it exists now, we DO KNOW what is going in both in congress and at the Fed. You claim there is no visibility, yet you say you know. You can't have it both ways. Either you have a good idea of what is happening, as you claim to, or you know nothing. So which is it?
@PhilDport I don't know where you get your misinformation, but the Fed refuses to even tell Congress who it just lent 13 TRILLION dollars to, which was leaked by Bloomberg. Federal agencies, on the other hand, are subject to the Freedom Of Information Act. So the idea that the fed exists to AVOID secrecy and corruption is just looney.
I completely agree with you on the fraud that is central banking. A system of competing currencies with a full or near full reserve requirement enforced under anti fraud legislation would be a far more efficient and stable system than state enabled central banking cartels printing worthless paper. Price stability and decent returns on savings would help foster a much more prudent society where productive investment is rewarded, so i agree with you here. Im Irish and cont >>
I'm not saying the Fed is legit or not, but in answer to the question "Why", the reason they created the Fed was, perhaps wisely, a separation of powers; they probably wanted the public to have visibility of how much money the government was spending, and to hold elected politicians accountable for how much money it was borrowing in excess of of revenues. It would probably be a lot worse if the politicians had direct control of the printing presses.
@PhilDport So it was wise to create a "separation of powers" by creating a secret, unaccountable private counterfeiting cartel? Um, that's not quite what "separation of powers" is supposed to mean. The crooks at the Fed don't even let Congress know what they're doing, much less you and me. There is NO visibility of what's going on this way.
@LarkenRose All of the chairmen of the Federal Reserve have been Jews. Alan Greenspan was even sworn into a government position on the satanic Talmud (which claims that Christ is boiling in hell in excrement and semen and that the "best of the gentiles should be killed") instead of the bible. The Fed is also the brainchild of the New World Order Jew named Paul Warburg. Oh yes, I forgot, I have to get past my "group thinking" to blind myself from the reality of the Jewish control of America.
@st1ckycheese Yes, you do still have to get over your pack mentality. I wonder, since the chairmen of the Federal Reserve have also all been MEN, do you therefore declare that all men are the enemy? You still seem incapable of grasping the fact that only INDIVIDUALS can be responsible for what they do. If you don't want to be personally blamed for all the evil things white, Christian men have done throughout history--and that has been quite a bit--then learn to think rationally.
@LarkenRose Wow, what ridiculous logic. These Jews have white men by the balls. They rape our country, steal our money, spy on us, take away our rights, send our kids to war all the while knowing that there are so many pussies like you that would never openly call them out on their crimes. They will keep on doing what they are doing because they know that people like you would never name them as the culprits. BTW, why do you think that Jews were expelled 109x from Europe?
@st1ckycheese "These Jews," or "all Jews"? Once again, you keep displaying your muddle-headed thinking for all to see. I name culprits who actually DO bad stuff, not people who happen to be genetically related to people who do bad stuff. I notice you dodged my question: Do YOU want to be held personally responsible for what all white, Christian men have done throughout history? If so, by your rationale, several billion people in the world have the right to kill you.
@LarkenRose White Christian men do not have a doctrine that they adhere to and act upon. The Jews do. It's called Orthodox Judaism whose bible is the Talmud which teaches them to steal from non Jews as well as kill, enslave and rule them. This is why they got expelled from Europe 109x. It's their adherence to the Talmud that's destroying America today. Go ahead and pretend and skip around the issue, but understand that it is the truth.
@st1ckycheese Nice job of dodging the question again. Do YOU want to be held responsible for what all the other white, Christian men have done? After you answer that (when pigs fly), answer this: Do you want to be held responsible for what the book of Christianity commands? Like, for example, stoning to death anyone who says "goddamn," or who believes in another god, or works on the sabbath. Or do you think you are responsible only for what YOU personally do?
@LarkenRose How does your question even relate to the facts and points that i have made? It's not a matter of blaming every individual for the actions of the group, it's a matter of what is the source of our problems. Orthodox Talmudic Jews are the source of our eroding freedoms, non-white immigration, our war economy which is bankrupting us. Jews actively work as a group to destroy us, and you are coming up with ridiculous questions to avoid the issue.
@LarkenRose How does your question even relate to the facts and points that i have made? It's not a matter of blaming every individual for the actions of the group, it's a matter of what is the source of our problems. Orthodox Talmudic Jews are the source of our eroding freedoms, non-white immigration, our war economy which is bankrupting us. Jews actively work as a group to destroy us, and you are coming up with ridiculous questions to avoid the issue.
@LarkenRose Christianity is Jewish religion from the Middle East. It wasn't created in Europe, genius. You question isn't even an apt one because whites don't have some collective doctrine that teaches them what to do like the satanic Talmud does.
@st1ckycheese Your "argument" is nothing but vague half-histories & opinion based on viewpoint. I like the "Expelled teh Jewz 109X!"...but your illogic denies the fact of WHO asked them into the governments to begin with. I seem to remember a King James and Oliver Cromwell sending out invites. Russian Czars? German Emperors and Nazi's (NAZI = National Socialist Zionist) perhaps? Christianity has nothing to do with Judaism...Manes/Manichees in 200 A.D. said THAT. Go read a book.
@TheCaptainSlappy The Nazis didn't call themselves "Nazis." The word "Nazi" is nothing but a play on the way the word "national" is pronounced in German. It's a derogatory diminutive created by the enemies of the National Socialists. So why don't YOU go read a book, you idiot. You might as well say that the Jew Bolsheviks referred to themselves with the Russian equivalent of the word "commie" you fucking dumbass.
@st1ckycheese NICE! Jump around it, no Haavara Transfer Agreement...none of that right? It's like you never read any books about them building both the Communist party and the National Socialists in 1897 during the Basel Congresses. You are desperate to make a fictional fight...when again, you have no actual fact, and opinions only. Swing away, Short Bus...swing away.
@TheCaptainSlappy Yes, I'm sure that the Czars of Russia enjoyed having Jews, against whom pogroms were carried out every once in a while, in their midst. And even if they did, the Romanov family and their young, beautiful children sure as hell paid for it in a cellar in Yekaterinburg when they were butchered by a hit squad led by an ugly Jew who finished off the kids with bayonets.
@st1ckycheese Ah. Nice! You picked one example, and then did the voter trap of "generally applying it" across all others to support a fictional position to an argument you do not have. Note- Do I look Russian to you? I reckon that is a Pa-Russkie problem...not like they didn't ask them in or anything.
@LarkenRose Your logic here is so ridiculous. I guess if you are a general at war it would be wise to think about the actions of individual soldiers instead of the entire armies of the opposing nation. I'm sure you would be on the winning side of that war, Larken! We have a whole race of people who believe they have the God given right to steal our money, use us as slaves and dominate us, but you can only see the trees instead of the forest. You are a fool.
@st1ckycheese ..But then again you are too smart to really be a fool. You write good books, make great videos, so I actually take that back. You are not a fool and, in a sense, I actually wish that more whites had your views on liberty and government. I just think that you know what I say is true, but you will never admit it, or you do not want to further explore the topic because you are too scared.
@st1ckycheese I'm not "scared" of thinking stupid things. Again, I ask you, are you PERSONALLY responsible for whatever bad things have been done by other people who happen to be of the same race and/or religion as you? Or are INDIVIDUALS alone responsible for their own actions? If you say the latter--which you should--you expose the stupidity of your own pack mentality. (Don't worry, it took Malcolm X a while to figure this out too, but he eventually got over his racism.)
@st1ckycheese If I was a general at war, I'd shoot whoever was above me, and quit. That's the difference between you and me. Your pack mentality leads you to believe the idiotic lie that there can be an enemy COUNTRY, or an enemy RACE, instead of targeting the INDIVIDUALS who choose to initiate violence against innocents.
@LarkenRose Great thinking. I'm sure that the Founders would've won the war against the British with those ingenious tactics. America would be dominated by the British today if Americans listened to your idiotic advice. I love how your inability to admit that I am right makes you say such stupid things. Tells me all I need to know that I am right and you are wrong. People are not individuals they are a link in a chain, and that's nature, buddy. It's them against us. That's how it was and...
@st1ckycheese ..always will be whether you like it or not. Race is all that matters. The Jews understand that well, and that's why they are winning and dominating and all you can do is make YouTube videos and complain. And that's why they work day and night to flood this country with non-whites and promote miscegenation. They work day and night to destroy our country and race. So keep preaching your doctrine and pretend like it's not the Jews who are punching you in the face.
@st1ckycheese you see, the way it works is,if we dont have enough jobs they blame the mexicans,if crime is high they blame black folks, if theres not enough money they blame the jews,racism isnt a problem its a tool,divided we fall, we are powerless by our own hate and distrust, people need to start talking
@jdefabs2112 Except there wouldn't BE a national debt, and very little private debt, if there wasn't a Federal Reserve. Congress wouldn't lend itself money; it would just print it. There would still be inflation, but no "national debt."
@LarkenRose if money had some actual value inflation would equal itself out,without the fed res we would have no dept to the fed res but that doesnt change the fact that we produce very little in this county and minimum wage is no where near enough to live on, you cant have a country of 80% service jobs at min wage, its leagalize slavery,the welfare system is slavery on the people, and with fewer and fewer mid range pay jobs were going to sink
The part I am not clear on is, All the "Debt" ends up as Treasury Bills, Notes etc. The Debt is not owed to the IRS except the amount of Treasury stuff that the IRS actually holds. I suppose one would have to audit the FED to understand how all they get paid in all this process. In bailing out the Banks, Domestic and foreign, who owes who and how? Do we have to pay interest to the FED on Treasuries held by them? I am not sure about that.
@jonahbert111 You and I aren't SUPPOSED to understand it all. It's supposed to be so damn convoluted and twisted that we give up and let the "experts" handle it. That's why I stick to the most basic point: people who produced NO wealth simply FABRICATED all of the money that Americans borrowed to get so far into debt. It's ALL fraud. Every last fiat penny. When the people finally understand that, I wouldn't want to be a banker, or a politician.
It never was a conspiracy. The original intention of central banks were to limit a government's ability to just print as much money as they wanted, causing a spiraling inflation, like it happened for most most pre-central bank fiat currencies. Seemed like a decent idea at the time as they didn't know what we know today. It's still a lot better than direct government control over the printing press.
@MigDanskeren Let me get this straight. You think it's BETTER to have a private, completely unaccountable counterfeiting racket, that can do everything in secret (ask the Fed who it just loaned those trillions to). Well, they do tend to carry out more sustainable, prolonged enslavement schemes than third-world, short-sighted dictators, but that's not a good thing. As for "what we know today," allow me to share a few things that some people knew a couple hundred years ago...
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." [Thomas Jefferson] Gosh, what does that sound like? (Read a newspaper and find out.)
"Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control credit, and with a flick of a pen they will create enough to buy it back." [Sir Josiah Stamp (former President of the Bank of England)]
@LarkenRose Also check out what President Wilson, President Garfield, President Jackson, and even that bastard FDR, said about the bankers. Here's a short one from James Madison: ""History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance." Tell me again how we didn't know any better before 1913.
It is not private but a combination of private banks and government institutions. But yes, private is _always_ better than government.
Any fiat currency is doomed to fail but an independent central bank is less bad than direct government printing as it's more stable. History has proved than, not only in third-world countries but also in the West. If you read up on central banking in the West you'll find that fiat currencies perform less bad than government printing.
Books of interest here: . . Banking and Currency and the Money Trust - by Charles A. Lindbergh . . Secrets of the Federal Reserve - by Eustace Mullins . . Great Red Dragon, or London Money Power - by L.B. Woolfolk . . The Rothschild Money Trust - by George Armstrong . . Selected Prose of Ezra Pound: 1909-1965 - by Ezra Pound
it clearly is a conspiracy... its just not a theory...
and, throughout history, many different forms of money have existed, paper, gold, stones, shells, etc... the brutal truth, is that everything is money... there is no difference between paying someone for a service in dollars, or in grapefruits... if it is agreed upon by both parties...
well... maybe one... grapefruits are useful, theyre edible, only real uses for paper money are origami and tinder...
@AndrejGregus Take a simple example. If someone gave each person a million newly printed dollars, would we all be rich? No. We'd be exactly where we are now, except the value of the dollar would turn into nothing. Pieces of paper are not wealth. As an even sillier example, if you were alone on a desert island, with a billion dollars, would you be living in luxury?
@AndrejGregus So long as you don't force people to use it or prevent them from using any other form of money it would be good in so far as the people that think it is good will be the ones using it. I personally would not be convinced to use a form of money that does not have wealth backing it up unless forced.
Yep, and since the USD is the world's reserve currency, the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel is ripping the entire world off. Most don't care they're being robbed.
Great vid Larken... When I try to explain the Federal Reserve system to people that are unaware of it, I start with one simple question to them; Why borrow money, at interest, when you're capable of printing it yourself?
According to the 1871 foundation of the US Corp. Any new taxes have to approved by 2/3 of both the house & senate AND then the Bill goes to the PEOPLE for a vote.
Have you ever voted on anything the Govt passed a bill on ?
The whole this was a scam & treason & this can & is being proven by a select few here in our country, THANK GOD. Charges are being filled by Private Attorney Generals against this illegal corp called the District of Columbia.
@bryphi77 The Constitution instructs congress to use gold and silver, something they can not create. How much they can manipulate it would be rather transparent, much more transparent than the Fed.
@mersk100 The point is... as we can see... I matters little what the constitution says.
Also, the constitution was considered the original patriot act by 95% of the population when it was ratified, but it was still jammed down the throat of the masses at gun point so that a few statist, industrialist, and land owners could live like kings off of the forced labor and taxation of the masses.
It took years of indoctrination to get people to beleive slavery is freedom...
@mersk100 I will explain it like i would to a 4 year old so you can understand it better. Why is it that you think that you should not be forced to live under the federal reserve act, but that I should have to live under the rest of the constitution.
So basically, you can pick and choose what parts of the constitution you want to obey, but I cant.
You are a retard with blinders on. That why you cant see the point.You have been enslaved your whole life, and its not the fault of the fed
@bryphi77 Now you're just making things up out of thin air. That has to be one of the poorest attempts of a strawman I have ever seen.
Oh, and while you're running around calling people names, maybe you can learn how to form an argument, go look up some of the fallicious tactics you try to use. And then, maybe you'll be wise enough to discuss the subject in the vid and not throw out your sophmoric crap. In other words, grow the fuck up.
Larkin, a challenge for someone to disagree with the concept of this video? I doubt any will bite on that one. So, that makes me wonder where we are in the process awakened duped people put to sleep
since government is not going to pay it back, it does systemically make no difference, if government printed up the IOUs or the neighbor. Up to that point its not a conspiracy.
Fucked up are only the people holding the IOU-promises thinking of it as "value" in exchange of real goods or labor.The only "conspiracy" as you want to call it might be to hold the sheeple stupid. But, thats also the free choice of the people.
@GermanInvestor They wouldn't be IOU's if the "government" just printed (or electronically fabricated) "dollars." There would be nothing to "pay back." Yes, it would still be theft, and would cause huge inflation, but it would be a fundamentally different scam than the perpetual enslavement scheme known as "fractional reserve banking."
@LarkenRose thats why i dont get your complaint. u said it yourself, one "scam" exchanged for another (due to huge inflation probably bigger) scam :D
No matter how you look at it, the nature of the problem is how to judge the value of a token of exchange and how to generate it by whom. Just live with it: There's no final solution. Spend your money to enjoy life and save the rest in gold.
@GermanInvestor There's no solution? How about not using fiat currency? (Yes, I know getting everyone to do that would be almost impossible right now.) As the video said, my point isn't that direct federal counterfeiting would be good, but that the current situation is obviously the result of an intentional, fraudulent conspiracy.
@GermanInvestor Menger and a few others have already answered this, that item which has the highest degree of saleability. The core of what money is however is simple, an abstraction of labor. Fiat debt laden notes are labor in the future, commodity monies are labor in the past, understand that and much is revealed.
The solution to the discussed problem is let the free market decide what money is, and if more than one, let the market define the relative values and interest rates.
@GermanInvestor Money's saleability, Absatzfahigkeit as Menger puts it. It is the easiest sold commodity, it provides the most flexibility with regards to trade. This is what allows money to "get something later".
Yet how did that gold/silver/shells/lion tooth, in useable form, come to be in the hand of man in the first place? Someone had to go collect it, time and effort, labor, in the past was used to produce it.
@mersk100absolutely is money not a product or good. Because otherwise it could not be a token of exchange. Like i said, it would be barter. Some essay from 1892 is not really helpful.
Deeply understanding the implecations of Triffin paradox should show you, that a medium of exchange and never be a store of value. If it is the same there will always a conflict between savers and debtors.
@GermanInvestor Gold functioned as money for a very long time, it is a good, do you deny this?
If the medium of exchange has no value, then why bother to own it?
As for Triffin dilemma, this applies to a national currency and the ramifications with regards to national monetary policies, not the natural tensions between savers and lenders, which will exist regardless, as a result of scarcity.
@GermanInvestor That may be, that we are discussing somewhat different things. I'll conclude with, let the market decide what is and is not money. Then it won't matter what definition we use.
@GermanInvestor Real "money" is just a medium of exchange, and they happen naturally. If not for "government" forcing people to accept fiat crap, I doubt anyone would pay any attention to "printing press" money, no matter who it's from.
@LarkenRose ACK, so what happens if people start to use that "natural money" as a store of value and start to hoard it? How does "the system" generate "interest"?
See, i think your not dumb, but have you ever thought of all consequences?
@GermanInvestor Hording is a check on interest. If rates are too low, then people will hold their gold back as they should. People still need to eat, buy gas, pay the rent, etc. The rate of interest will be set by the market in conjuction with the chaning, typicaly increasing, levels of productivity, increasing the value of the gold over time. So interest will need to be sufficently attractive. Malinvestment will be far less as will wasteful consumerism.
@GermanInvestor As productivity gains are made, we would expect a natural and gradual deflationary environment. 1 Oz of gold today buys 100 widgets, next year it buys 105 widgets. So even at 0% interest, the lender still increases his wealth. The first thing to do in anwering such questions is not assume interest rates must always be positive in nominal terms. In the example, the nominal rate is 0%, the real rate is 5%.
@mersk100 "So even at 0% interest, the lender still increases his wealth."
why should i then lend money to somebody in the first place? So no interest no credit. No credit->just barter: No major economy, just barter. Welcome to the dark age.
@mersk100 nice piece. Except: Either you end up with 1.) promises on more gold (=derivative on gold=fractional banking) or 2.) deflationary collapse or 3.) a new gold ponzi scheme.
I'd rather would NOT lend my gold in that environment, but keep it and wait to see that system also failing.
@GermanInvestor Deflation isn't a bad thing, a collapse is a bad thing, but this requires some external event to trigger it. The natural deflationary pressure, created by productivity gains, be it from simple population growth or technology is sustainable.
As for a ponzi/dereivitive/fractional, surely something will evolve, just as it did hundreds of years ago, but let the market create it, not a government. Let government judiciate the contracts, not the methods.
I believe the rational was to keep the power to print money out of the hands of the govt so they wouldn't just print up all they want to carry out whatever projects they wanted. Milton Friedman explained it in Free to Choose. Like most govt ideas, it didn't turn out quite like they planned.
Here's another conspiracy theory. That Israel or the US, blew up the cars of those Iranian nuclear scientists rather than the truth, that they blew themselves up. LOL!
The same thing is happening in Australia, just substitute United States Of America (the corporation masquerading as a government) with Commonwealth Of Australia and Federal Reserve (a private bank using usury, debt slavery) with Reserve Bank Of Australia.
Our Govt is a Private Corp, Google "Statutes at Large and PROCLAMATIONS of the THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Dec. 1869 to March 1871 and Treaties & Postal Conventions, Volume 16. "
This Govt document proves how illegal it was for our own Govt to even give the Fed Res this power. 1st off it required 2/3 of the vote of ALL members of congress. This was never done & blatantly shows they did NOT have the authority to do so. I don't think anyone in Congress even knows their own Laws & Statutes.
@eagleeye1975 Uh... are you saying the Federal Reserve came into being by coincidence, because individuals who weren't communicating with each other did things in their own best interest? Or did I miss the point of your comment?
This is beating a dead horse, the information that what the federal reserve does is counterfeiting is readily available, the face that people 'dont know about it' means that most people are willingly ignoring it. We are a shitty mammal.
@sonofagunM357 Yes, the truth of this has been around for ages, but keep in mind, there are still a lot of people--most people, in fact--who have never heard this. While I agree that people in general tend to be unthinking, willfully ignorant sheep, a lot of them never had a chance to understand reality, because they've never heard anyone stating the truth.
They want to force us to work. It's not about making money. It's about controlling people. Plus, a debt crisis takes people's attention away from all the people they're killing in other countries.
@PluralOfEverything True, it's one step worse than mere theft. Quite literally, it's a way to enslave everyone, via mathematically inescapable "debt." If I can steal $100 from you, that's bad. If I can make you think you owe me $100 every week, forever, that's considerably worse. The purpose of international bankers is not merely to own everyTHING, but to own everyONE.
Conspiracy: any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result. It doesn't even have to be malignant to be defined under "conspiracy." But today being called a conspiracy theorist really just means you openly challenge the words and actions of confirmed, repeat serial liars.
Larken get your website working
the page for 861evedence only works on some browsers. you need to fix the 403 error it shows directions on the page
funkychicken100005 1 day ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Hey Larken. I went to your website to buy your book but your site is down. Just wanted to let you know in case you weren't aware. Peace!
magichandpuppet 1 day ago
dam bro i love all the shit you do . heard it on gnostic media. however you should forreals consider shaving your mustache haha so people don't see you as some crazy dude with a creeper stache.
glutaminepowder 5 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Subbed! Love your stuff - clear and direct, best I've seen on this topic so far.
Only problem is, I can't for the LIFE of me find a way to get a hold of 'The Most Dangerous Superstition' here in the UK, not even through common online retailers it seems! I checked your site, but I still got the impression that shipping didn't apply to international orders.
Is there any chance at all that I can arrange to have a custom order made, to cover the necessary oversees shipping costs in my case?
xemy101 3 weeks ago
@xemy101 Use myUS.com
kevin188888 4 days ago
Ask Ron Paul To Organize it!!!
cultofedward 1 month ago
How can we get 10,000,000 men to come to the aid of thier country and March on Washington fully Constitutionaly Armed??
cultofedward 1 month ago
I like the way you think.. sounds like common sense.. lol, the next thing the treasonous gov't will outlaw is common sense..
Dewdaahman 1 month ago
Goldman loves having their own printing press.
LFCsoldier 1 month ago
According to the New York Times article titled "Fed Turns Over $77 Billion in Profits to the Treasury", the Fed is "required by law to turn over its profits to the Treasury each year". Doesn't that mean that any interest paid toward loans from the Fed go back to the US Treasury, and the Fed is simply doing the work of creating and loaning money for the US treasury?
changeyournode 1 month ago
@changeyournode No, it means the New York Times is a completely worthless collection of collectivist bullpoop with no connection to reality. The "profits" mentioned are nothing compared to the FABRICATED wealth, in the trillions, that enrich the banks and enslave everyone else. The story was printed for one purpose: to confuse people into thinking what you just said--that the Fed doesn't get any wealth from the arrangement. Utter and complete BS.
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
@changeyournode It's sort of true but disingenuous - since the loan has no legitimate purpose in the first place. And they keep 10% of the profits... from a system that is essentially fraud. Even if they kept only 0.001%, it's still fraud and would still be billions and billions of dollars. I hope that helps. Thanks!
randytate 1 week ago
You are all fags : the cheapest way to save world economy is to shoot everymoving jew
jewNoseBook 1 month ago
@jewNoseBook The only reason I'm not removing your comment is because I think it's important for people to know the moronic opinions that are out there. So thanks for being so "informative," and making your idiotic voice heard.
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 7
Ok, @LarkenRose
i have another idea,if we burn Talmud (the jewish porn & terrorism manual)
the jew ,will lose the north & desapear.... sane pple hate jews ,,You like Them ?
jewNoseBook 4 weeks ago
@LarkenRose Exactly my point. The "crooks" at congress would forever print "counterfeit" money without our knowledge, if they had that power, and the only visibility we would have of it is the devaluation of our currency. The way it exists now, we DO KNOW what is going in both in congress and at the Fed. You claim there is no visibility, yet you say you know. You can't have it both ways. Either you have a good idea of what is happening, as you claim to, or you know nothing. So which is it?
PhilDport 1 month ago
@PhilDport I don't know where you get your misinformation, but the Fed refuses to even tell Congress who it just lent 13 TRILLION dollars to, which was leaked by Bloomberg. Federal agencies, on the other hand, are subject to the Freedom Of Information Act. So the idea that the fed exists to AVOID secrecy and corruption is just looney.
LarkenRose 1 month ago 3
@LarkenRose
I completely agree with you on the fraud that is central banking. A system of competing currencies with a full or near full reserve requirement enforced under anti fraud legislation would be a far more efficient and stable system than state enabled central banking cartels printing worthless paper. Price stability and decent returns on savings would help foster a much more prudent society where productive investment is rewarded, so i agree with you here. Im Irish and cont >>
sadpuppy85 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@sadpuppy85
I've witnessed the havoc wreaked by central banks(the ECB) in my own country.
sadpuppy85 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Being bright is lonely
cyanideisabitterpill 1 month ago
I'm not saying the Fed is legit or not, but in answer to the question "Why", the reason they created the Fed was, perhaps wisely, a separation of powers; they probably wanted the public to have visibility of how much money the government was spending, and to hold elected politicians accountable for how much money it was borrowing in excess of of revenues. It would probably be a lot worse if the politicians had direct control of the printing presses.
PhilDport 1 month ago
@PhilDport So it was wise to create a "separation of powers" by creating a secret, unaccountable private counterfeiting cartel? Um, that's not quite what "separation of powers" is supposed to mean. The crooks at the Fed don't even let Congress know what they're doing, much less you and me. There is NO visibility of what's going on this way.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose All of the chairmen of the Federal Reserve have been Jews. Alan Greenspan was even sworn into a government position on the satanic Talmud (which claims that Christ is boiling in hell in excrement and semen and that the "best of the gentiles should be killed") instead of the bible. The Fed is also the brainchild of the New World Order Jew named Paul Warburg. Oh yes, I forgot, I have to get past my "group thinking" to blind myself from the reality of the Jewish control of America.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese Yes, you do still have to get over your pack mentality. I wonder, since the chairmen of the Federal Reserve have also all been MEN, do you therefore declare that all men are the enemy? You still seem incapable of grasping the fact that only INDIVIDUALS can be responsible for what they do. If you don't want to be personally blamed for all the evil things white, Christian men have done throughout history--and that has been quite a bit--then learn to think rationally.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose Wow, what ridiculous logic. These Jews have white men by the balls. They rape our country, steal our money, spy on us, take away our rights, send our kids to war all the while knowing that there are so many pussies like you that would never openly call them out on their crimes. They will keep on doing what they are doing because they know that people like you would never name them as the culprits. BTW, why do you think that Jews were expelled 109x from Europe?
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese "These Jews," or "all Jews"? Once again, you keep displaying your muddle-headed thinking for all to see. I name culprits who actually DO bad stuff, not people who happen to be genetically related to people who do bad stuff. I notice you dodged my question: Do YOU want to be held personally responsible for what all white, Christian men have done throughout history? If so, by your rationale, several billion people in the world have the right to kill you.
LarkenRose 1 month ago 3
@LarkenRose White Christian men do not have a doctrine that they adhere to and act upon. The Jews do. It's called Orthodox Judaism whose bible is the Talmud which teaches them to steal from non Jews as well as kill, enslave and rule them. This is why they got expelled from Europe 109x. It's their adherence to the Talmud that's destroying America today. Go ahead and pretend and skip around the issue, but understand that it is the truth.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese Nice job of dodging the question again. Do YOU want to be held responsible for what all the other white, Christian men have done? After you answer that (when pigs fly), answer this: Do you want to be held responsible for what the book of Christianity commands? Like, for example, stoning to death anyone who says "goddamn," or who believes in another god, or works on the sabbath. Or do you think you are responsible only for what YOU personally do?
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose How does your question even relate to the facts and points that i have made? It's not a matter of blaming every individual for the actions of the group, it's a matter of what is the source of our problems. Orthodox Talmudic Jews are the source of our eroding freedoms, non-white immigration, our war economy which is bankrupting us. Jews actively work as a group to destroy us, and you are coming up with ridiculous questions to avoid the issue.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@LarkenRose How does your question even relate to the facts and points that i have made? It's not a matter of blaming every individual for the actions of the group, it's a matter of what is the source of our problems. Orthodox Talmudic Jews are the source of our eroding freedoms, non-white immigration, our war economy which is bankrupting us. Jews actively work as a group to destroy us, and you are coming up with ridiculous questions to avoid the issue.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@LarkenRose Christianity is Jewish religion from the Middle East. It wasn't created in Europe, genius. You question isn't even an apt one because whites don't have some collective doctrine that teaches them what to do like the satanic Talmud does.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese Your "argument" is nothing but vague half-histories & opinion based on viewpoint. I like the "Expelled teh Jewz 109X!"...but your illogic denies the fact of WHO asked them into the governments to begin with. I seem to remember a King James and Oliver Cromwell sending out invites. Russian Czars? German Emperors and Nazi's (NAZI = National Socialist Zionist) perhaps? Christianity has nothing to do with Judaism...Manes/Manichees in 200 A.D. said THAT. Go read a book.
TheCaptainSlappy 1 month ago
@TheCaptainSlappy The Nazis didn't call themselves "Nazis." The word "Nazi" is nothing but a play on the way the word "national" is pronounced in German. It's a derogatory diminutive created by the enemies of the National Socialists. So why don't YOU go read a book, you idiot. You might as well say that the Jew Bolsheviks referred to themselves with the Russian equivalent of the word "commie" you fucking dumbass.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese NICE! Jump around it, no Haavara Transfer Agreement...none of that right? It's like you never read any books about them building both the Communist party and the National Socialists in 1897 during the Basel Congresses. You are desperate to make a fictional fight...when again, you have no actual fact, and opinions only. Swing away, Short Bus...swing away.
TheCaptainSlappy 1 month ago
@TheCaptainSlappy Yes, I'm sure that the Czars of Russia enjoyed having Jews, against whom pogroms were carried out every once in a while, in their midst. And even if they did, the Romanov family and their young, beautiful children sure as hell paid for it in a cellar in Yekaterinburg when they were butchered by a hit squad led by an ugly Jew who finished off the kids with bayonets.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese Ah. Nice! You picked one example, and then did the voter trap of "generally applying it" across all others to support a fictional position to an argument you do not have. Note- Do I look Russian to you? I reckon that is a Pa-Russkie problem...not like they didn't ask them in or anything.
TheCaptainSlappy 1 month ago
@LarkenRose Your logic here is so ridiculous. I guess if you are a general at war it would be wise to think about the actions of individual soldiers instead of the entire armies of the opposing nation. I'm sure you would be on the winning side of that war, Larken! We have a whole race of people who believe they have the God given right to steal our money, use us as slaves and dominate us, but you can only see the trees instead of the forest. You are a fool.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese ..But then again you are too smart to really be a fool. You write good books, make great videos, so I actually take that back. You are not a fool and, in a sense, I actually wish that more whites had your views on liberty and government. I just think that you know what I say is true, but you will never admit it, or you do not want to further explore the topic because you are too scared.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese I'm not "scared" of thinking stupid things. Again, I ask you, are you PERSONALLY responsible for whatever bad things have been done by other people who happen to be of the same race and/or religion as you? Or are INDIVIDUALS alone responsible for their own actions? If you say the latter--which you should--you expose the stupidity of your own pack mentality. (Don't worry, it took Malcolm X a while to figure this out too, but he eventually got over his racism.)
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese If I was a general at war, I'd shoot whoever was above me, and quit. That's the difference between you and me. Your pack mentality leads you to believe the idiotic lie that there can be an enemy COUNTRY, or an enemy RACE, instead of targeting the INDIVIDUALS who choose to initiate violence against innocents.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose Great thinking. I'm sure that the Founders would've won the war against the British with those ingenious tactics. America would be dominated by the British today if Americans listened to your idiotic advice. I love how your inability to admit that I am right makes you say such stupid things. Tells me all I need to know that I am right and you are wrong. People are not individuals they are a link in a chain, and that's nature, buddy. It's them against us. That's how it was and...
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese ..always will be whether you like it or not. Race is all that matters. The Jews understand that well, and that's why they are winning and dominating and all you can do is make YouTube videos and complain. And that's why they work day and night to flood this country with non-whites and promote miscegenation. They work day and night to destroy our country and race. So keep preaching your doctrine and pretend like it's not the Jews who are punching you in the face.
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese So... people are not individuals, and the Third Reich wasn't a bad government. Thanks for enlightening me. I'm done with you.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@st1ckycheese you see, the way it works is,if we dont have enough jobs they blame the mexicans,if crime is high they blame black folks, if theres not enough money they blame the jews,racism isnt a problem its a tool,divided we fall, we are powerless by our own hate and distrust, people need to start talking
jdefabs2112 1 month ago
@LarkenRose thats easy, so when the country is buried in dept the gov has a scape goat
jdefabs2112 1 month ago
@jdefabs2112 Except there wouldn't BE a national debt, and very little private debt, if there wasn't a Federal Reserve. Congress wouldn't lend itself money; it would just print it. There would still be inflation, but no "national debt."
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose if money had some actual value inflation would equal itself out,without the fed res we would have no dept to the fed res but that doesnt change the fact that we produce very little in this county and minimum wage is no where near enough to live on, you cant have a country of 80% service jobs at min wage, its leagalize slavery,the welfare system is slavery on the people, and with fewer and fewer mid range pay jobs were going to sink
jdefabs2112 1 month ago
so basically we get shit on
cyazuri 1 month ago
The part I am not clear on is, All the "Debt" ends up as Treasury Bills, Notes etc. The Debt is not owed to the IRS except the amount of Treasury stuff that the IRS actually holds. I suppose one would have to audit the FED to understand how all they get paid in all this process. In bailing out the Banks, Domestic and foreign, who owes who and how? Do we have to pay interest to the FED on Treasuries held by them? I am not sure about that.
jonahbert111 1 month ago
@jonahbert111 You and I aren't SUPPOSED to understand it all. It's supposed to be so damn convoluted and twisted that we give up and let the "experts" handle it. That's why I stick to the most basic point: people who produced NO wealth simply FABRICATED all of the money that Americans borrowed to get so far into debt. It's ALL fraud. Every last fiat penny. When the people finally understand that, I wouldn't want to be a banker, or a politician.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
It never was a conspiracy. The original intention of central banks were to limit a government's ability to just print as much money as they wanted, causing a spiraling inflation, like it happened for most most pre-central bank fiat currencies. Seemed like a decent idea at the time as they didn't know what we know today. It's still a lot better than direct government control over the printing press.
MigDanskeren 1 month ago
@MigDanskeren Let me get this straight. You think it's BETTER to have a private, completely unaccountable counterfeiting racket, that can do everything in secret (ask the Fed who it just loaned those trillions to). Well, they do tend to carry out more sustainable, prolonged enslavement schemes than third-world, short-sighted dictators, but that's not a good thing. As for "what we know today," allow me to share a few things that some people knew a couple hundred years ago...
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." [Thomas Jefferson] Gosh, what does that sound like? (Read a newspaper and find out.)
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
"Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control credit, and with a flick of a pen they will create enough to buy it back." [Sir Josiah Stamp (former President of the Bank of England)]
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@LarkenRose Also check out what President Wilson, President Garfield, President Jackson, and even that bastard FDR, said about the bankers. Here's a short one from James Madison: ""History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance." Tell me again how we didn't know any better before 1913.
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@LarkenRose
It is not private but a combination of private banks and government institutions. But yes, private is _always_ better than government.
Any fiat currency is doomed to fail but an independent central bank is less bad than direct government printing as it's more stable. History has proved than, not only in third-world countries but also in the West. If you read up on central banking in the West you'll find that fiat currencies perform less bad than government printing.
MigDanskeren 1 month ago
@MigDanskeren
Yes, fiat currency and legal tender sucks, but complaining about the Fed being private only promotes socialism.
MigDanskeren 1 month ago
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
it clearly is a conspiracy... its just not a theory...
and, throughout history, many different forms of money have existed, paper, gold, stones, shells, etc... the brutal truth, is that everything is money... there is no difference between paying someone for a service in dollars, or in grapefruits... if it is agreed upon by both parties...
well... maybe one... grapefruits are useful, theyre edible, only real uses for paper money are origami and tinder...
taithnanethcan 1 month ago
Holocaust Mind Control:
.
.
.
watch?v=EU4Im5U7wyw
st1ckycheese 1 month ago
Comment removed
hagbard72 1 month ago
hey americans :P i got an idea, give 1 000 000 000 $ to each citizen and make the rest of the world do all your work :P
mikerozo 1 month ago
...if money was printed interest free and for benefit of all, would not it be good?
AndrejGregus 1 month ago
@AndrejGregus Take a simple example. If someone gave each person a million newly printed dollars, would we all be rich? No. We'd be exactly where we are now, except the value of the dollar would turn into nothing. Pieces of paper are not wealth. As an even sillier example, if you were alone on a desert island, with a billion dollars, would you be living in luxury?
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 11
@AndrejGregus So long as you don't force people to use it or prevent them from using any other form of money it would be good in so far as the people that think it is good will be the ones using it. I personally would not be convinced to use a form of money that does not have wealth backing it up unless forced.
LatteJonny 1 month ago
Yep, and since the USD is the world's reserve currency, the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel is ripping the entire world off. Most don't care they're being robbed.
helpendthefed 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man who finds gold in a field. He goes and sells all that he has so he can purchase that field.
1776bricks 1 month ago
Comment removed
1776bricks 1 month ago
LOL.....I LOVE when i see a normal, everyday joe smash the conventional wisdom. You made my day dude
FreedumbFighter28 1 month ago
Great vid Larken... When I try to explain the Federal Reserve system to people that are unaware of it, I start with one simple question to them; Why borrow money, at interest, when you're capable of printing it yourself?
usexoticsltd 1 month ago
Comment removed
usexoticsltd 1 month ago
BTW, Great Videos my Friend :)
It's refreshing to see someone who hasn't lost their ability of Critical Thinking.
I'm just blown away at the amount of people I meet who are asleep & don't even bother, and worse, don't even want to try to think independently.
WulfBand 1 month ago
According to the 1871 foundation of the US Corp. Any new taxes have to approved by 2/3 of both the house & senate AND then the Bill goes to the PEOPLE for a vote.
Have you ever voted on anything the Govt passed a bill on ?
The whole this was a scam & treason & this can & is being proven by a select few here in our country, THANK GOD. Charges are being filled by Private Attorney Generals against this illegal corp called the District of Columbia.
WulfBand 1 month ago
What I try to explain to people is why would the government charge itself interest.
Unfortunately most people don't understand but I'm not giving up them.
CosmosPrivateer 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
congress or fed makes little difference... Same game different profiteers... shows how dumb and ineffective the constitution really is.
bryphi77 1 month ago
@bryphi77 The Constitution instructs congress to use gold and silver, something they can not create. How much they can manipulate it would be rather transparent, much more transparent than the Fed.
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 The point is... as we can see... I matters little what the constitution says.
Also, the constitution was considered the original patriot act by 95% of the population when it was ratified, but it was still jammed down the throat of the masses at gun point so that a few statist, industrialist, and land owners could live like kings off of the forced labor and taxation of the masses.
It took years of indoctrination to get people to beleive slavery is freedom...
bryphi77 1 month ago
@bryphi77 *eye roll* Sorry, I don't play the moral equivocation game, the red herring game or the moving the goal posts game.
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 LOL... if thats the case than what are you complaining about the fed for? No need to move the goal post...
bryphi77 1 month ago
@bryphi77 Let us know when you decide to make a coherent argument
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 I will explain it like i would to a 4 year old so you can understand it better. Why is it that you think that you should not be forced to live under the federal reserve act, but that I should have to live under the rest of the constitution.
So basically, you can pick and choose what parts of the constitution you want to obey, but I cant.
You are a retard with blinders on. That why you cant see the point.You have been enslaved your whole life, and its not the fault of the fed
bryphi77 1 month ago
@bryphi77 Now you're just making things up out of thin air. That has to be one of the poorest attempts of a strawman I have ever seen.
Oh, and while you're running around calling people names, maybe you can learn how to form an argument, go look up some of the fallicious tactics you try to use. And then, maybe you'll be wise enough to discuss the subject in the vid and not throw out your sophmoric crap. In other words, grow the fuck up.
mersk100 1 month ago
Larkin, a challenge for someone to disagree with the concept of this video? I doubt any will bite on that one. So, that makes me wonder where we are in the process awakened duped people put to sleep
walkertonkidd 1 month ago
Keep the videos coming!
landofthefreemyass 1 month ago
since government is not going to pay it back, it does systemically make no difference, if government printed up the IOUs or the neighbor. Up to that point its not a conspiracy.
Fucked up are only the people holding the IOU-promises thinking of it as "value" in exchange of real goods or labor.The only "conspiracy" as you want to call it might be to hold the sheeple stupid. But, thats also the free choice of the people.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor They wouldn't be IOU's if the "government" just printed (or electronically fabricated) "dollars." There would be nothing to "pay back." Yes, it would still be theft, and would cause huge inflation, but it would be a fundamentally different scam than the perpetual enslavement scheme known as "fractional reserve banking."
LarkenRose 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
@LarkenRose thats why i dont get your complaint. u said it yourself, one "scam" exchanged for another (due to huge inflation probably bigger) scam :D
No matter how you look at it, the nature of the problem is how to judge the value of a token of exchange and how to generate it by whom. Just live with it: There's no final solution. Spend your money to enjoy life and save the rest in gold.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor There's no solution? How about not using fiat currency? (Yes, I know getting everyone to do that would be almost impossible right now.) As the video said, my point isn't that direct federal counterfeiting would be good, but that the current situation is obviously the result of an intentional, fraudulent conspiracy.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose the question is, what is money? what is the essence of money? What should it be and what is the purpose of money? How to achive that?
You are making it to simple. End the FED and giving the printing press to Obama or the fanatic Bill Still socialist makes no difference. NOT AT ALL.
For further consideration you might want to take a look at the FOFOA Freegold blog. Great posts are "moneyness" and "Return to honest money".
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Menger and a few others have already answered this, that item which has the highest degree of saleability. The core of what money is however is simple, an abstraction of labor. Fiat debt laden notes are labor in the future, commodity monies are labor in the past, understand that and much is revealed.
The solution to the discussed problem is let the free market decide what money is, and if more than one, let the market define the relative values and interest rates.
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 "The core of what money is however is simple, an abstraction of labor."
Is it really?
I say, it is a promise to get stuff later. Even with gold, it is a symbol (token of exchange) to get "somehting later" (since "you cannot eat gold").
Only difference with gold (instead of paper), it can not be diluted.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Money's saleability, Absatzfahigkeit as Menger puts it. It is the easiest sold commodity, it provides the most flexibility with regards to trade. This is what allows money to "get something later".
Yet how did that gold/silver/shells/lion tooth, in useable form, come to be in the hand of man in the first place? Someone had to go collect it, time and effort, labor, in the past was used to produce it.
mersk100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mersk100 "It is the easiest sold commodity"
sorry, but thats BS, what you describe is not money, thats barter.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Go read some Menger and get back to me. I suggest "The Origins of Money".
You seem to be under the assumption that money is it self not a product, a good.
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100absolutely is money not a product or good. Because otherwise it could not be a token of exchange. Like i said, it would be barter. Some essay from 1892 is not really helpful.
Deeply understanding the implecations of Triffin paradox should show you, that a medium of exchange and never be a store of value. If it is the same there will always a conflict between savers and debtors.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Gold functioned as money for a very long time, it is a good, do you deny this?
If the medium of exchange has no value, then why bother to own it?
As for Triffin dilemma, this applies to a national currency and the ramifications with regards to national monetary policies, not the natural tensions between savers and lenders, which will exist regardless, as a result of scarcity.
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 "Gold functioned as money for a very long time, it is a good, do you deny this?"
see, we have the problem, that the 2 of us are having different view what is money ;)
What is gold good for? only that it is accepted by another "to settle debt", thats its only "value", since you can not eat or burn it ;)
I strongly suggest the article "moneyness" of the FOFOA blog.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor That may be, that we are discussing somewhat different things. I'll conclude with, let the market decide what is and is not money. Then it won't matter what definition we use.
mersk100 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Real "money" is just a medium of exchange, and they happen naturally. If not for "government" forcing people to accept fiat crap, I doubt anyone would pay any attention to "printing press" money, no matter who it's from.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@LarkenRose ACK, so what happens if people start to use that "natural money" as a store of value and start to hoard it? How does "the system" generate "interest"?
See, i think your not dumb, but have you ever thought of all consequences?
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Hording is a check on interest. If rates are too low, then people will hold their gold back as they should. People still need to eat, buy gas, pay the rent, etc. The rate of interest will be set by the market in conjuction with the chaning, typicaly increasing, levels of productivity, increasing the value of the gold over time. So interest will need to be sufficently attractive. Malinvestment will be far less as will wasteful consumerism.
mersk100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mersk100 "If rates are too low, then people will hold their gold back as they should. "
how do you pay interest, if gold above stock is not increasing? Starting a new pnzi scheme, like the "Dollar-Gold-Standard"?
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor As productivity gains are made, we would expect a natural and gradual deflationary environment. 1 Oz of gold today buys 100 widgets, next year it buys 105 widgets. So even at 0% interest, the lender still increases his wealth. The first thing to do in anwering such questions is not assume interest rates must always be positive in nominal terms. In the example, the nominal rate is 0%, the real rate is 5%.
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 "So even at 0% interest, the lender still increases his wealth."
why should i then lend money to somebody in the first place? So no interest no credit. No credit->just barter: No major economy, just barter. Welcome to the dark age.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor You are thinking in nominal terms, not in real terms.
Here ya go, play with this, lewrockwell (dot) com/north/north1075 (dot) html
mersk100 1 month ago
@mersk100 nice piece. Except: Either you end up with 1.) promises on more gold (=derivative on gold=fractional banking) or 2.) deflationary collapse or 3.) a new gold ponzi scheme.
I'd rather would NOT lend my gold in that environment, but keep it and wait to see that system also failing.
GermanInvestor 1 month ago
@GermanInvestor Deflation isn't a bad thing, a collapse is a bad thing, but this requires some external event to trigger it. The natural deflationary pressure, created by productivity gains, be it from simple population growth or technology is sustainable.
As for a ponzi/dereivitive/fractional, surely something will evolve, just as it did hundreds of years ago, but let the market create it, not a government. Let government judiciate the contracts, not the methods.
mersk100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe the rational was to keep the power to print money out of the hands of the govt so they wouldn't just print up all they want to carry out whatever projects they wanted. Milton Friedman explained it in Free to Choose. Like most govt ideas, it didn't turn out quite like they planned.
Here's another conspiracy theory. That Israel or the US, blew up the cars of those Iranian nuclear scientists rather than the truth, that they blew themselves up. LOL!
hagbard72 1 month ago
Comment removed
hagbard72 1 month ago
always good!
1717jbs 1 month ago
The same thing is happening in Australia, just substitute United States Of America (the corporation masquerading as a government) with Commonwealth Of Australia and Federal Reserve (a private bank using usury, debt slavery) with Reserve Bank Of Australia.
AFrayedKnotMate 1 month ago
I really dig ur vids man, if you are ever in the Charlotte, NC region, email me, I'll buy ya lunch and or dinner.
worldwidebum 1 month ago
Our Govt is a Private Corp, Google "Statutes at Large and PROCLAMATIONS of the THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Dec. 1869 to March 1871 and Treaties & Postal Conventions, Volume 16. "
This Govt document proves how illegal it was for our own Govt to even give the Fed Res this power. 1st off it required 2/3 of the vote of ALL members of congress. This was never done & blatantly shows they did NOT have the authority to do so. I don't think anyone in Congress even knows their own Laws & Statutes.
WulfBand 1 month ago
It's not a conspiracy if the actors involved don't have to communicate with each other, and simply act in their own self interest.
eagleeye1975 1 month ago
@eagleeye1975 Uh... are you saying the Federal Reserve came into being by coincidence, because individuals who weren't communicating with each other did things in their own best interest? Or did I miss the point of your comment?
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@eagleeye1975 "if the actors involved don't have to communicate with each other"
But they most certainly do.
"and simply act in their own self interest"
That is the point.
If you were using your eagle-eye circa 1975 you'd have noticed by now there isn't a one.
No... not one American owns even one share in that private foreign corpse-oration.
GnosticNinja 1 month ago
"The 'government's' their working for our benefit, serving our interests." ....thanks for that one, needed the laugh.
wisdomtrek 1 month ago
This is beating a dead horse, the information that what the federal reserve does is counterfeiting is readily available, the face that people 'dont know about it' means that most people are willingly ignoring it. We are a shitty mammal.
sonofagunM357 1 month ago
@sonofagunM357 Yes, the truth of this has been around for ages, but keep in mind, there are still a lot of people--most people, in fact--who have never heard this. While I agree that people in general tend to be unthinking, willfully ignorant sheep, a lot of them never had a chance to understand reality, because they've never heard anyone stating the truth.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
They want to force us to work. It's not about making money. It's about controlling people. Plus, a debt crisis takes people's attention away from all the people they're killing in other countries.
PluralOfEverything 1 month ago
@PluralOfEverything True, it's one step worse than mere theft. Quite literally, it's a way to enslave everyone, via mathematically inescapable "debt." If I can steal $100 from you, that's bad. If I can make you think you owe me $100 every week, forever, that's considerably worse. The purpose of international bankers is not merely to own everyTHING, but to own everyONE.
LarkenRose 1 month ago 2
It's time to hang these fucking criminals. Period. Hang them.
JejuLee 1 month ago
@JejuLee We're not going to hang anyone. we're going to harvest their organs "for the common good"
gombagod 1 month ago
@gombagod
With their livers cirrhotic, their brains necrotic
and hearts that do not exist
it seems there is little, except for their diddles
in the service of man, to enlist
JejuLee 1 month ago 2
@JejuLee I admire your wordsmithing skills. One complaint though "Exept for their diddles in the service of man" don't you mean woman? xD
gombagod 1 month ago
Good vid..
btw, your voice is very similar to "Bulldog" from Frasier. lol
ghana25 1 month ago
The truth is... Everything is a lie.
batfly 1 month ago
Conspiracy: any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result. It doesn't even have to be malignant to be defined under "conspiracy." But today being called a conspiracy theorist really just means you openly challenge the words and actions of confirmed, repeat serial liars.
JaceJohanson 1 month ago
Another good video from you! Care to update us on the tax crap?
brush200400 1 month ago
@brush200400 - Tax = crap. You are now caught up! ;P
worldwidebum 1 month ago 3
@worldwidebum Oh I've been thinking it since childhood.
brush200400 1 month ago
@brush200400 Nothing new to report. The federal thieves tends to be slow but persistent in their terroristic extortion activities.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
@brush200400 Nothing new to report. The federal thieves tend to be slow but persistent, while terrorizing and extorting people.
LarkenRose 1 month ago
go larken go
red88ization 1 month ago