Added: 4 years ago
From: Google
Views: 26,364
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • nice one!

  • size matters

  • is there a transcript for this?

  • all i heard was wwwwong ween dung chow

  • Nano wires could have fixed that micro!

  • lf not in the wrong hands it is brilliant !!! it must to be use for peace not for war!!!

  • @MoisesMarkella most of the tech in this world has already been used up the wrong way, why would they show a per stage weapon when it probably has a;ready been perfected to a point we can go super human.

  • excellent work!

  • Richard Feynman is definitely a hero of mine...

  • I'm going into 8th grade...and my passion lies in the sciences. Most kids my age find subjects such as this to be quite dull. But man are they disillusioned! Who can resist the call of semiconductor nanocrystals?! Haha, this stuff is so cool!

  • ur going into 8th grade but your 27... nice.

  • That's good for you. You remind me of myself, about 14 years ago. lol. Follow up your interest with education - if you're interested in a job in nanotech you'll need to have calculus, quantum physics, and theoretical physics under your belt. The world needs new scientists in order to keep the flow of ideas coming. I love nanotech, biotech, infotech, computation, and robotics.

  • 27 years at your mothers house! it is possible that you have spent them all in the basement watching tv and playing around on her old computer. it is time for work, wal-mart doesn't like it when muffinsman1 is late....

  • Comment removed

  • @videolizzard99 wow, how racist can you get? what, are we back in the 4th grade?

  • i think its awsome that google takes the time to do these talks, but you need an IQ of at least 100 to enjoy them.

  • The minimum of 100 IQ was a joke, right?

  • leaf, i agree with you.

    instead of just doing a video, they do a recording...

    google talks sux

  • i must say this is a very borin video, it really made me go to sleep i had better teacher teach as they sleep.

  • nanotechnoRogy

  • It might be nice to know that the Guru of NanoTech at NASA is funded by Google.

  • and nanotechnology is awesome ALSO...

    but I dont want to sound too critical ALSO

    i think this guy is a nanotechnology ALSO

  • guess who'd i'd rather listen to between him and you.

  • dont you have anything else to say? ALSO

  • Thankyou for share this knwoledge with us, it really seems very interesting for me, it turn on in my mind the need to study and keep up dated in these topics

  • Like you said Yi, as a consumer I am looking for something *MEANINGFUL* when it comes to the *BATTERY LIFE* in my Laptop. I want to be able to use my Latop for 24 or 72hrs before I have to charge-it. I trust nanotechnology can help with this enduring problem.

  • how long before we see results of technology in society ?

  • Every subatomic particle that we know of has at least four dimensions, and the inability of man to measure them shouldn't redefine yet another term. But don't surprised about high levels of junk science from all sides. This presentation even referred to protein as a species.

  • "Zero-dimensional" is a convenient label and may not be strictly accurate but facilitates communication in the same way that you would talk about a pencil lead or kleenex rather than pencil compressed graphite paste or paper tissue for the nose respectively. I believe the Professor used species in its strict technical, chemical sense to refer to a chemical entity rather than in its biological sense referring to a collection of biological entities with similar biological characteristics.

  • Thnaks for the explanation. In another post I mentioned that redefining terms is problematic, at best. Case closed.

  • I feel smarter now that I've read this. Haha. Hey, very nice "discussion".

  • Very interesting.

    It will be interesting to see how this topic of research plays out over the next few decades.

  • The terms I really can't wrap my mind around are "one-dimensional and zero-dimensional morphology". What do these terms mean?

  • I think when people talk of nanowires they think of them as one-dimensional (having only length). And that the mentioned Quantum Dots (QDs) are the zero-dimensional objects.

  • ah, gotcha. that makes sense. Thanks.

  • It refers to the possible movement of the electrons. In a QD the electrons are trapped in all three dimensions due to the nano size of the QD. This physics is a consequence of the geometry though.

  • oh yeah ok nvm then :)

  • 42 minutes?! wth?!

  • its a google vid, youtube is owned by google

  • Why cann't I see this:(

  • i'd rather listen to him than you.

  • views 63 lmfao. great vid google official channel.

  • cool!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more