@blehface3000 Get a car that *is* fucking or one that is *for* fucking in??? Why? How would this stop such bizarre driving? Oh... I see.... you're a dimwit with limited braincells.
@sh4rkybloke It's called a cycle lane, or whatever it is called in the UK, you wanker. You are worse then bin laden, are making shit and make people angry, you are making the problems and then you put these people out here. Pathetic little pussy.
@DaNeShady90 Lol. Is that your best trolling? Pretty crap. Let me explain it simply for you... see the video at 14 seconds... the cycle lane is waaaay over on the left of the road... whereas I'm going to the right... where the cycle lane doesn't go... is that any clearer for your tiny mind as to why I wouldn't be using it? Tw@t.
"On some cars, indicators are an optional extra." Lol. Shithead drivers. I better not get any of this shit next year when I take my bike to school. They'll end up driving home with their headlights broken, missing wingmirrors and shattered windows.
You are filtering through MOVING traffic. Tut tut. The car doesn't not change lanes so you have no right to enter THEIR space in the first place.
Then you overtake another cyclist far too closely and you also never did your life-saver and therefore caused the same black car to move excessively out and almost fully into the oncoming lane.
It will be nice when cyclists have to display registration plates and perhaps then they will wind their necks in.
@grahamscott89 Firstly I am in the left of the 2 right hand lanes.. he is in the outer one and cuts back sharply into *my* side without checking. As for overtaking the other cyclist... he is just to the right of the double yellows while I am to the right of the centre of the lane (it's wide enough for 2 lanes of traffic to drive along this side).. no need for a lifesaver as I don't change my line. The overtaker checks it's safe to overtake, and moves wide, as he should. Open your eyes.
If you want to be pedantic, you didn't give the other cyclist enough room when overtaking at 0.27. Seen so many of these videos complaining about not being given enough room while getting overtaken, so seems a bit hypocritical when you fly past close by to another cyclist.
@joerobertson At 26 secs the other rider passes to the left of a manhole cover on the road, I pass to the right of it (by about a foot)... seems plenty of room to me. The lens' wider angle makes it look a bit closer as I actually pass, but my line doesn't deviate until I've overtaken him. I don't complain about cars overtaking giving that much room so I see no hypocrisy myself.
I'll bet he went to go and suddenly realised you were there and had a "oh f***!" moment realising his mistake, perhaps thats why he went wide... I say he, could have been a woman too, LOL
@drsquirrel0 at least equally likely I have to agree. From the footage I cannot see if the side repeater is flashing, but then at that angle in daylight you may not be able to see it and anyway they are very prone to failure due to impact damage or dodgy connections.
"The only thing a flashing light definitely indicates is that the bulb is working." Got that one from Kevin Williams, well respected "Survival Skills" Advanced Motorcycling instructor.
here's an idea, get a fucking car
blehface3000 1 month ago
@blehface3000 Get a car that *is* fucking or one that is *for* fucking in??? Why? How would this stop such bizarre driving? Oh... I see.... you're a dimwit with limited braincells.
sh4rkybloke 1 month ago
I hope you signaled when you passed the other bike as the car passed you .
blobby273 2 months ago
although I agree the drivers are bad in your videos, what are you actually hoping to achieve from posting these up?
ChristmasTrax 3 months ago
Driving in a twattish manner, brake light inoperative, just like a Golf!
MAPFWH 3 months ago
Quite funny!
How fast are you going?
MrSilverfox333 3 months ago
What the fuck did u do in the 3rd lane, anyway, idiot?
DaNeShady90 5 months ago
@DaNeShady90 Errm, I used it to get where I wanted to go... where the two left hand lanes don't go. Very simple...much like you it seems.
sh4rkybloke 5 months ago
@sh4rkybloke It's called a cycle lane, or whatever it is called in the UK, you wanker. You are worse then bin laden, are making shit and make people angry, you are making the problems and then you put these people out here. Pathetic little pussy.
DaNeShady90 5 months ago
@DaNeShady90 Lol. Is that your best trolling? Pretty crap. Let me explain it simply for you... see the video at 14 seconds... the cycle lane is waaaay over on the left of the road... whereas I'm going to the right... where the cycle lane doesn't go... is that any clearer for your tiny mind as to why I wouldn't be using it? Tw@t.
sh4rkybloke 5 months ago 3
@sh4rkybloke Like my mum says
"On some cars, indicators are an optional extra." Lol. Shithead drivers. I better not get any of this shit next year when I take my bike to school. They'll end up driving home with their headlights broken, missing wingmirrors and shattered windows.
Roblox901143 3 months ago
@Roblox901143 and you might go home in a police car, or ambulance
ImRatherTall 3 months ago
@ImRatherTall Trolollol, kidding.
Roblox901143 3 months ago
You are filtering through MOVING traffic. Tut tut. The car doesn't not change lanes so you have no right to enter THEIR space in the first place.
Then you overtake another cyclist far too closely and you also never did your life-saver and therefore caused the same black car to move excessively out and almost fully into the oncoming lane.
It will be nice when cyclists have to display registration plates and perhaps then they will wind their necks in.
grahamscott89 6 months ago
@grahamscott89 Firstly I am in the left of the 2 right hand lanes.. he is in the outer one and cuts back sharply into *my* side without checking. As for overtaking the other cyclist... he is just to the right of the double yellows while I am to the right of the centre of the lane (it's wide enough for 2 lanes of traffic to drive along this side).. no need for a lifesaver as I don't change my line. The overtaker checks it's safe to overtake, and moves wide, as he should. Open your eyes.
sh4rkybloke 6 months ago
Metal box operators - probably 'think' - the momentary angle of their container - should be enough 'indication'
They 'forget' - about the - 'timely' - aspect to the - signalling conversion
These driver's kids have (or will have) bikes - and they wonder what the mentality is of - the lunatic driver that slaughters them
OghamTheBold 9 months ago
get a life mate cyclist in general
should be a crim
mattyboy2611 10 months ago
If you want to be pedantic, you didn't give the other cyclist enough room when overtaking at 0.27. Seen so many of these videos complaining about not being given enough room while getting overtaken, so seems a bit hypocritical when you fly past close by to another cyclist.
joerobertson 1 year ago
@joerobertson At 26 secs the other rider passes to the left of a manhole cover on the road, I pass to the right of it (by about a foot)... seems plenty of room to me. The lens' wider angle makes it look a bit closer as I actually pass, but my line doesn't deviate until I've overtaken him. I don't complain about cars overtaking giving that much room so I see no hypocrisy myself.
sh4rkybloke 1 year ago
As you say, based on his subsequent overtake, I imagine that was a genuine mistake, and probably one that won't be made again.
WheelyGoodFun 1 year ago
doesnt want to wear out the bulbs :P
dazxy2001 1 year ago
I'll bet he went to go and suddenly realised you were there and had a "oh f***!" moment realising his mistake, perhaps thats why he went wide... I say he, could have been a woman too, LOL
downfader2 1 year ago
i think his indicator is beak ,because whan he braked ,the left fire don't light
Abdelhak92izi 1 year ago
@Abdelhak92izi
I was going to point out the brake light, but they are independent systems and shouldn't affect each other.
drsquirrel0 1 year ago
@drsquirrel0 most light clusters have a common earth wire, so that could be the problem.
nigglenoo 1 year ago
@nigglenoo Aye I forgot about that.
Though, my oppinion are they didn't indicate anyway, since they were only squeezing past in the same lane (only just).
drsquirrel0 1 year ago
@drsquirrel0 at least equally likely I have to agree. From the footage I cannot see if the side repeater is flashing, but then at that angle in daylight you may not be able to see it and anyway they are very prone to failure due to impact damage or dodgy connections.
"The only thing a flashing light definitely indicates is that the bulb is working." Got that one from Kevin Williams, well respected "Survival Skills" Advanced Motorcycling instructor.
nigglenoo 1 year ago