REAL Free energy technology exists!But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
REAL Free energy technology exists!But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
lol it doesent seem like a good aa gun because of the reload time but the power of it 1 hit would like kill a plane and I guess it must have good sights on it. its kinda stupid how the range was supposed to be loike 25 kilometers or miles because of planes that high in the sky but in most massive map semi realistic games like RUSE in which most things are realistic it has a really short range :(
@khead99 The reload time of the 88mm is a few seconds. Case is ejected, you ram the next shell into the breech (which closes automatically), ready to fire again. I think you are confusing your games and reality here...
@DevSolar yea i think i was being effected by major lack of sleep when i posted that. Even still though it seems like a much better AT gun then AA gun because of the reload.
@khead99 :-D The 88 fired 15+ shots / minute and was considered the best German AA gun of its time. It had twice the vertical range of all lighter guns. Granted, its balistic performance made it a fearsome tank killer, but it was also heavy, slow, had a very high silhouette, and next to no protection for the crew (until the advent of the PaK 43). Serving the 88 while pounded by enemy artillery and shelled by tank counterfire was no day in the park. What made the 88 famous was its versatility.
@DevSolar It wasn't a particularly good AA gun actually. The caliber was too light which contributed to a long flight time, shorter range, and insufficient warhead size. They built a ton of em, but it was well known amongst the Wehrmacht how ineffective their anti aircraft artillery net was. Which is why they were eager to service the 12.8cm gun ASAP.
@CaptHawkeye *Sigh* How do you figure "too light a caliber" when the alternatives were 3.7cm and 5cm? How do you figure "long flight time" for a gun reknown for its high muzzle velocity (which exceeded that of the 10.5cm and 12.8cm)? How do you figure "shorter range" when it performed on par with the best contemporary guns, with a range exceeding the flight ceiling of all contemporary bombers by a good margin? That's like saying the Hurricane wasn't a good plane because of the Mustang.
@DevSolar Because their were *other* heavy AA guns in the world and the 88 wasn't special compared to any of them. It also doesn't matter that the 88 had a higher muzzle velocity, a bullet from a machine gun has a higher muzzle velocity than a tank round. Which one carries more energy? The 12.8 and 10.5 rounds were bigger and thus could carry more HE and retain much of their velocity with altitude.
@CaptHawkeye Oh boy, you sure miss some basic lessons in balistics. Starting with the fact that a contemporary machine gun did *not* have a significantly higher muzzle velocity than a tank round. (Example: MG 42 and FlaK 18/36/37 did both have a V0 of 820 m/s.) And a heavier round fired with the same V0 being able to "retain much of its velocity with altitude"? I mean, seriously?
@DevSolar Just like the 12.8cm gun did not have vastly greater muzzle velocity than the 88 right? 820 vs 880 m/s?
Examples of other guns, the muzzle velocity of an MG34 round was 800ish m/s while the Pak 38 a muzzle velocity around 700 m/s. My point is that V0 *isn't everything* and that's clearly the case with an AA gun.
Yes it retains it's velocity *better* with altitude. What's unreasonable about that? A larger shell doesn't lose acceleration as fast as a small one.
The 88MM had more power than that. Good first time though. Add more smoke, recoil, and sound. We will be going throught the same problem as we are building a full scale Tiger 1.
88mm is the width of the projectile. Its length is much longer, over 60 cm.
Most anti-aircraft projectiles have time fuze, which cause them to explode after a certain amount of time. I've seen a video of a heavy bomber being shot by the 88mm. Its whole left wing broke off
This film clip was analyzed by the Museum of the US Air Force. The B-24 was downed by a direct flak hit at just outboard the left wing root. The B-24 had wing tanks just inboard of the #2 & #3 engines, as well as provisions for carrying a bomb bay tank connecting the two. The Liberator was also notorious for leaking fumes into the bomb bay and the bomb bay doors had to be 'cracked open' in flight to vent those fumes. (read more in vid comment)
Yeah, I was thinking they'd basically have to have a bunch of them arrayed.
Nevertheless, it speaks volumes of the skill of the operators and the ingenuity of the engineering that they were able to get even close enough with their rounds for flak to be effective from far enough away that the planes would have been mere specks. Not to mention that they were moving targets!
in slo-mo : FIAAAH THE AA GUUUUUUN! *pulls* *looking* "hey there is a american" *looking in the air* "hey i dont see it where is it" "me neither" "me neither" "me neither" *looking behind them* "ohh it fell out the flak gun ill put it in again!" *picking it up* "oh-oh!" *BOOM!*
Actually the king tiger's gun actually had a heavier round, and the case was longer...more powder. Overall a much more powerful gun than the original 88
if im right...im not totally sure...but i think this gun started as an AA weapon - but the germans whilst fighting turned it on the allied tanks...and BOOM! since then - they decided to use it against tanks - and then went on to develop the likes of the tiger tank...
150mm? Sorry, but there were no anti-tank or AAA guns of that caliber in WWII, only artillery, which has radically differrent stats, like way lower shell velocities.
the 88mm also fired a high velocity flak round, which could reach above 25.000 feet. The anti-tank role was not realized until some guy tried to kill a tank with it (lol im serious)
It depends of wich type of 8,8. There where 3 evolution levels from the original AA-Gun (8.8 L/56) called Flak 18, Flak 36 and Flak 37. MaxRange: 14.860 m MaxHeight: 10.600 m and a total new design in 1941from Rheinmetall called Flak 41 (8,8 L/74,4) with considerably more firepower and velocity MaxRange: 19.800 m MaxHeight: 14.700 m
dnt read this(cuz it really wrks). u will gt kissd on the nearest frieday by the love of ur life. 2mara wll b the bst day of ur life hwever if you dnt post ths comment 2 at least 3 vids u will die withn 2 days nw uv startd readn this dnt stp this is so scary snd ths ovr 2 5 vids in 143 mins when ur done press f6 nd ur crush's name wll appear on the screen n big letters ths is so scary cuz it actully wrks ths really wrks
Yes class of the Flakschütze fires away with the force of the drive load the eardrum over Jordan during the remainder of the garrison a horzontalbewegung pursued, as could one the story afterwards see itself... and to all redundance, they snuggle without cover with the ammunition...
ja klasse der Flakschütze ballert sich mit der Wucht der Treibladung das Trommelfell übern Jordan während der Rest der Besatzung eine horzontalbewegung verfolgt, als könnte man dem Geschoss hinterher sehen... und zu allem Überfluss kuscheln sie ohne Deckung mit der Munition...
Das ist reinste Platzverschwendung auf dem Server...
Hey, but it is close to reality, good job actually :) Due to my job I also do renderings for architectural visualisation, it`s a nice hobby combined with my job ;o) Yup, you are right, my name means Norwegian forest cat. Let`s look forward to CoD Pt.5 then ;o)
Hi Norwegian forest cat (hope translation is correct!)
This is an experimental footage: the 88 gun is a Tamya scale 1:35 plastic model that I filmed frame by frame to eventually simulate recoil. The environment is CGI from Call of Duty game engine. The gun crew are people that I have filmed and blue screened onto the image; this is an experiment. you are right, still does not look perfect....
@KerajaanNasi He probably believed you, just didn't want to ask nicely so he could get the video to watch, though I fear I might be wrong.
Jarheadftw 3 weeks ago
Reminds me of Red Alert cutscenes
ThePlaidFace 8 months ago 2
@Bakminsterfulerit00 indeed
Trillios 8 months ago
@Bakminsterfulerit00 erh looking at the plane?
Trillios 8 months ago
Was that background from call of duty united offensive multiplayer?
lukum55 9 months ago
i love it good to get cod uo in 2
naziempire1 11 months ago
Why the Hell would people dislike this video? This was just amazing!
MHXDownfall 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
faerydhhlo 1 year ago
Yay! Thats Foy from CoD UO
234jari234 1 year ago
FOY!
inkatrit 1 year ago
spamming german spawn FTW
Var1ety 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
affluenceclm 1 year ago
'88 was much better as a tank killer than anti-aircraft.
I had read it was Rommel who first used them as anti-tank guns but it might have been a myth (plenty surrounding that man lol)
CJLinton 1 year ago
would swear the background came from United Offensive
Tw1St3DSt33L 1 year ago
lol it doesent seem like a good aa gun because of the reload time but the power of it 1 hit would like kill a plane and I guess it must have good sights on it. its kinda stupid how the range was supposed to be loike 25 kilometers or miles because of planes that high in the sky but in most massive map semi realistic games like RUSE in which most things are realistic it has a really short range :(
khead99 1 year ago
@khead99 The reload time of the 88mm is a few seconds. Case is ejected, you ram the next shell into the breech (which closes automatically), ready to fire again. I think you are confusing your games and reality here...
DevSolar 10 months ago
@DevSolar yea i think i was being effected by major lack of sleep when i posted that. Even still though it seems like a much better AT gun then AA gun because of the reload.
khead99 10 months ago
@khead99 :-D The 88 fired 15+ shots / minute and was considered the best German AA gun of its time. It had twice the vertical range of all lighter guns. Granted, its balistic performance made it a fearsome tank killer, but it was also heavy, slow, had a very high silhouette, and next to no protection for the crew (until the advent of the PaK 43). Serving the 88 while pounded by enemy artillery and shelled by tank counterfire was no day in the park. What made the 88 famous was its versatility.
DevSolar 10 months ago
@DevSolar It wasn't a particularly good AA gun actually. The caliber was too light which contributed to a long flight time, shorter range, and insufficient warhead size. They built a ton of em, but it was well known amongst the Wehrmacht how ineffective their anti aircraft artillery net was. Which is why they were eager to service the 12.8cm gun ASAP.
CaptHawkeye 10 months ago
@CaptHawkeye *Sigh* How do you figure "too light a caliber" when the alternatives were 3.7cm and 5cm? How do you figure "long flight time" for a gun reknown for its high muzzle velocity (which exceeded that of the 10.5cm and 12.8cm)? How do you figure "shorter range" when it performed on par with the best contemporary guns, with a range exceeding the flight ceiling of all contemporary bombers by a good margin? That's like saying the Hurricane wasn't a good plane because of the Mustang.
DevSolar 10 months ago
@DevSolar Because their were *other* heavy AA guns in the world and the 88 wasn't special compared to any of them. It also doesn't matter that the 88 had a higher muzzle velocity, a bullet from a machine gun has a higher muzzle velocity than a tank round. Which one carries more energy? The 12.8 and 10.5 rounds were bigger and thus could carry more HE and retain much of their velocity with altitude.
CaptHawkeye 10 months ago
@CaptHawkeye Oh boy, you sure miss some basic lessons in balistics. Starting with the fact that a contemporary machine gun did *not* have a significantly higher muzzle velocity than a tank round. (Example: MG 42 and FlaK 18/36/37 did both have a V0 of 820 m/s.) And a heavier round fired with the same V0 being able to "retain much of its velocity with altitude"? I mean, seriously?
DevSolar 10 months ago
@DevSolar Just like the 12.8cm gun did not have vastly greater muzzle velocity than the 88 right? 820 vs 880 m/s?
Examples of other guns, the muzzle velocity of an MG34 round was 800ish m/s while the Pak 38 a muzzle velocity around 700 m/s. My point is that V0 *isn't everything* and that's clearly the case with an AA gun.
Yes it retains it's velocity *better* with altitude. What's unreasonable about that? A larger shell doesn't lose acceleration as fast as a small one.
CaptHawkeye 10 months ago
@DevSolar Correction the 88's muzzle velocity was greater than the 12.8 gun, by 60m/s. Not a major difference at all in V0.
CaptHawkeye 10 months ago
how you get the vid / simulation
skyttemaster 1 year ago
It needs a more violent recoil first !
oOCrossroadsOo 1 year ago
The 88MM had more power than that. Good first time though. Add more smoke, recoil, and sound. We will be going throught the same problem as we are building a full scale Tiger 1.
tron2102 2 years ago
I miss that game, when I was a little kid, that game was the best out there. But that was back in 2000
RedFang4 2 years ago
Not really. That background is from Call of Duty: United Offensive. It's the map Foy and the game is from 2004.
joostevens 1 year ago
2004 sorry, and yes it was coduo, brings a tear to my eye....
RedFang4 1 year ago
yeah i recognized that too. Good times.
carl7ritchie 1 year ago
jajajajajaj wtf
davidGTI 2 years ago
the backround music is from call of duty 1!
Miner10f3 2 years ago
Add smoke. When 88s fired there was quite a bit of smoke left hanging around the gun.
Drud14 2 years ago 2
The German 88, just the right amount of range with the right amount of punch.
kolbpilot 2 years ago 3
88mm is the width of the projectile. Its length is much longer, over 60 cm.
Most anti-aircraft projectiles have time fuze, which cause them to explode after a certain amount of time. I've seen a video of a heavy bomber being shot by the 88mm. Its whole left wing broke off
KerajaanNasi 2 years ago 17
@KerajaanNasi Erm, I think most flak rounds are pressure set. At a certain altitude the pressure on the mechanism triggers the detonation.
obeyance 1 year ago
@KerajaanNasi
link to that clip..or it didn't happen
oddballsok 9 months ago
@oddballsok
watch?v=H-1qIN6UeC4
KerajaanNasi 9 months ago
@oddballsok
this one's better
watch?v=oypA5lPUcOY
This film clip was analyzed by the Museum of the US Air Force. The B-24 was downed by a direct flak hit at just outboard the left wing root. The B-24 had wing tanks just inboard of the #2 & #3 engines, as well as provisions for carrying a bomb bay tank connecting the two. The Liberator was also notorious for leaking fumes into the bomb bay and the bomb bay doors had to be 'cracked open' in flight to vent those fumes. (read more in vid comment)
KerajaanNasi 9 months ago
@KerajaanNasi it sounds like my johnson
nolifemerc 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this video is fake and gay!
sporejunkie89 2 years ago
RWJ fan?
debramster123 2 years ago
Yes, big fan.
sporejunkie89 2 years ago
me to:D this video is fake and gay ( troll )
he's the best isnt he
debramster123 2 years ago 3
yeah, he is
sporejunkie89 2 years ago
@sporejunkie89
Two camels in a tiny car !!
Briselance 2 years ago
Long live RWJ!!!
sporejunkie89 2 years ago 3
squaids!!!!!!!
southparkasskicker 1 year ago
@AdamSavage88 Exploding shells? Shrapnel?
GoodSmackUp 2 years ago
88s were the Killah Baddys during WWII.
Genius design,modularity,versatile like a wiggly girl. Sehr gut. Sehr sohne.
Say yo' friggin' pray-erz if it's pointing your way.
Oh, Baby!
Gmissile 2 years ago
:D:D:D:D LOOOOLLL von Call of Duty United Offensiv, this are the Backround sounds and the backround is from this :D:D lool with 4 people in it XD
Germy23685 2 years ago
How did they ever hit planes with these slow-firing guns?
Tonjevic 2 years ago
Hitting a bomber with multiple 88s would be easy imo, remember its flak; it explodes :D
Drainege 2 years ago
Yeah, I was thinking they'd basically have to have a bunch of them arrayed.
Nevertheless, it speaks volumes of the skill of the operators and the ingenuity of the engineering that they were able to get even close enough with their rounds for flak to be effective from far enough away that the planes would have been mere specks. Not to mention that they were moving targets!
We truly are very skilled at killing each other.
Tonjevic 2 years ago
@Tonjevic
The planes they tried - and mostly managed - to hit with this were mostly heavy bombers flying in large formations and at high altitude.
Moreover, there were always more than just a few guns involved.
Briselance 1 year ago
The 88 gun fired without recoils? Really?
casylius 2 years ago 2
The best field gun of WWII. Can be used for Both anti-aircraft and anti-tank.
Nice job Germans!!
HKUK94 2 years ago
@HKUK94
Best gun ? Hmm ... it depends.
Remember, the 88 mm gun is very big and so, difficult to conceal and protect, difficult and long to move in firing position, etc.
But its' ballistic stats were more than good, you're right on that point.
Briselance 1 year ago
fake and historically inaccurate!
skinni45 2 years ago
luke2fast 2 years ago
you f**ing child
explosivefreak666 2 years ago
Comment removed
luke2fast 2 years ago
88! Hej!
VikingBerserkers 2 years ago
I think this was great haha!
Bazaarajack 2 years ago
haha call of duty map..badass
FlattusMaximusD 2 years ago
Computer Animation ......
JuroK77 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
88卐卐卐卐卐卐88
DerFreiegedanke 2 years ago
technically yeah but they put loads of upgrades and extensions on it
jasjas35 2 years ago
yeah Call of Duty 1 Soundtracks great
Freakforce666 2 years ago 14
king tiger has a bigger gun
jasjas35 2 years ago
No, it didn`t. It also has a 88-calibre Gun.
FZKUIMG 2 years ago
they put a 88mm turrent on its the same thing spit fuck
ggmoney6613 2 years ago
King Tiger had the same caliber gun, the just had a different barrel, so it could fire its projectiles further away
MIMIMYBF 2 years ago
Actually the king tiger's gun actually had a heavier round, and the case was longer...more powder. Overall a much more powerful gun than the original 88
smokey8595 2 years ago
in german is means: Flugabwehrkanone. in English Anti Air
at first the used it to shot down planes and bombers. the then used it like a AT gun.
i like this gun, because is has 2 dirfferent functions to shot
HrPropanfloete 2 years ago
if im right...im not totally sure...but i think this gun started as an AA weapon - but the germans whilst fighting turned it on the allied tanks...and BOOM! since then - they decided to use it against tanks - and then went on to develop the likes of the tiger tank...
but dont quote me on that
dannyday58218195 2 years ago 5
is this gun can destroy the tank
bestamerica 2 years ago 2
yes. it was very scared from the alliance.
DaGrothe 2 years ago
@bestamerica this gun was put on the best tank of WW2 the Tiger Tank I
guppyworld540 2 years ago
ok gup,,,
thank explain,,,
150MM is the best and more powerful explosive than 88MM
bestamerica 2 years ago
150mm? Sorry, but there were no anti-tank or AAA guns of that caliber in WWII, only artillery, which has radically differrent stats, like way lower shell velocities.
Magni56 2 years ago
Yes but that's artillery, and cannot be used in an AA role.
Superbiz2 2 years ago
the 88mm also fired a high velocity flak round, which could reach above 25.000 feet. The anti-tank role was not realized until some guy tried to kill a tank with it (lol im serious)
Direwolf13PS3 2 years ago
lol UO foy FTW
Companyman55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats BORING!!!!!
amEricaneurOstar 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u fucker used cod for your abusing????
F1zzzy90 2 years ago
Call of Duty The town of Foy in the ardennes
mission 4
Kopschot94 2 years ago 2
lol call of duty ^^
ZackWaldi 2 years ago 4
The put that on the tiger
25222537 2 years ago
The did on the Tiger I and a similar variant in the Tiger II
angusandleigh 2 years ago
call of duty! ^^
NowyYcer 2 years ago
map - Foy :D
T3436 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
for land targets
420chronmasta 2 years ago
It was oringanly made for AA
Skatermandudeguy 2 years ago 3
No it could shoot tanks aircraft ships and infantiry
neeker117 2 years ago 2
But it was oringanly made for AA, we all know that is could shoot at anything else
kortenaken 2 years ago 2
yeah your right sorry m8 :D
neeker117 2 years ago 2
It was also used during the spanish civil war, only no one knew it could be used as a AT gun
Airbornerock 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cover your mouth with you hand
2. Make a wish
3.Close your hand (fist)
4. Hold you hand at heart for 5 seconds
5. Send this to 3 more videos
6. Tommorrow will be the best day ever
it actually worked
lirrbeatlefan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REALISTIC' METER:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
1
GraveDiggersCorps 2 years ago
i wounder how far that shell will go
stunkacurtis 2 years ago
It depends of wich type of 8,8. There where 3 evolution levels from the original AA-Gun (8.8 L/56) called Flak 18, Flak 36 and Flak 37. MaxRange: 14.860 m MaxHeight: 10.600 m and a total new design in 1941from Rheinmetall called Flak 41 (8,8 L/74,4) with considerably more firepower and velocity MaxRange: 19.800 m MaxHeight: 14.700 m
chris99103 2 years ago 3
the range is about 3900 feet
420chronmasta 2 years ago
Ive seen one of these fire off in real life...they are loud as fuck
motomike8012 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
fuckers u killed are country
swagga7000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dnt read this(cuz it really wrks). u will gt kissd on the nearest frieday by the love of ur life. 2mara wll b the bst day of ur life hwever if you dnt post ths comment 2 at least 3 vids u will die withn 2 days nw uv startd readn this dnt stp this is so scary snd ths ovr 2 5 vids in 143 mins when ur done press f6 nd ur crush's name wll appear on the screen n big letters ths is so scary cuz it actully wrks ths really wrks
isamtator 2 years ago
Yes class of the Flakschütze fires away with the force of the drive load the eardrum over Jordan during the remainder of the garrison a horzontalbewegung pursued, as could one the story afterwards see itself... and to all redundance, they snuggle without cover with the ammunition...
That is purest place waste on the server...
darkbird7 3 years ago
LoL not bad played
darksquizzel 3 years ago 2
that's the foy level of Call of Duty: United Offensive on the background!
PvtHenk 3 years ago 2
ja klasse der Flakschütze ballert sich mit der Wucht der Treibladung das Trommelfell übern Jordan während der Rest der Besatzung eine horzontalbewegung verfolgt, als könnte man dem Geschoss hinterher sehen... und zu allem Überfluss kuscheln sie ohne Deckung mit der Munition...
Das ist reinste Platzverschwendung auf dem Server...
AlexxElder 3 years ago 4
who the hell fired that gun I didnt see someone even near the gun :S
CoolKidX85 3 years ago
the guy that moves his hand is holding a string that fires the gun
killerdaman 3 years ago
very realistic
ushrark 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
killerdaman 3 years ago
why did you do slowmo...
maxax6 3 years ago 3
pretty good job. but the main flaws of it are the shadows looking a bit off and the physics of the casing
KevinLounsberry 3 years ago
Is CoD5 the same as CoD World at War?
yfh10mg 3 years ago
yes.
freereloader1010 3 years ago
CoD World at War is CoD5
mindman1243 3 years ago
no same game
BlimpKing1000 3 years ago
the map of foy on the background nice job(Y)
NLPETERNL 3 years ago
there are no shadows ;)
RiMKO 3 years ago
Yes, no shadows in overcast conditions, well spotted!!
biltongbru 3 years ago
thank you :)
RiMKO 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Don't be an asshole! You want feedback, or why did you post this?
MyTymeBand08 3 years ago
what movie is this from?
billjesusgates 3 years ago
Made this self with a 1:35 painted scale model with real humans blue screened on a Call of Duty game engine back ground....
biltongbru 3 years ago
Very realistic, shuld've put a little more "oomf" when pulling the fuse.
JuB34JuB 3 years ago
Hey, but it is close to reality, good job actually :) Due to my job I also do renderings for architectural visualisation, it`s a nice hobby combined with my job ;o) Yup, you are right, my name means Norwegian forest cat. Let`s look forward to CoD Pt.5 then ;o)
NorwegsicheWaldkatze 3 years ago
Thanks for complement; looking very much forward to COD 5; graphics and human dynamics will be out of this world!!
biltongbru 3 years ago
For some reason it doesnt look realistic to me, I doubt its original material of WWII....
NorwegsicheWaldkatze 3 years ago
Hi Norwegian forest cat (hope translation is correct!)
This is an experimental footage: the 88 gun is a Tamya scale 1:35 plastic model that I filmed frame by frame to eventually simulate recoil. The environment is CGI from Call of Duty game engine. The gun crew are people that I have filmed and blue screened onto the image; this is an experiment. you are right, still does not look perfect....
biltongbru 3 years ago
NICE!
marknowhereman 3 years ago
outstanding! 5 stars! those spitfires dont stand a chance!
tinianfilms 3 years ago