Lol FAIL, horizontal velocity as opposed to vertical velocity. So thunderfoot tries to demonstrate conservation of Potential energy, and you fire a bottle HORIZONTALLY
Epic Fail, The rock was thrown with force from around (how tall are you?) four foot six and the water achieved a vertical height of around (lets be generous) five or six feet, do you realise how retarded that makes you look? I bet you can count to 20 if you take your socks and shoes off, I also noticed your trainers had laces, who tied them for you?
Well what does this prove exactly. You just crushed a coke bottle filled with water, the only thing this proves is how stupid the theory was to begin with.
I do not understand what you are trying to demonstrate here. We know that you have a liter of water, but how much does the rock weigh? How far is it supposed to go to demonstrate whatever you are trying to demonstrate?
I am guessing you are trying to demonstrate NephilimFree's moronic idea. Are you sure you are dropping the rock from the right height? You need to isolate more variables.
Just because you call something science does not make it science.
This proves absolutely nothing, if you are making reference to nephilimfree's challenge to how the moon's craters were formed then you fail to understand that the distance reached with water going horizontally is not equal to the distance which it travels up, your videos prove nothing and are flawed in ways to numerous to list. I honestly pity you
I hate ad hominems, but look at that raggedy backyard full of weeds, dog s***, busted wood, scrap metal and rocks. dude 0:22 what the hell is that metal frame in the background. and is that trash piled up in the upper right hand corner. and why do you have broken pieces of concrete? i think that is the most water that dead grass has seen in two years. Don't you believe in dumpsters? I bet you didn't even pick up that broken bottle when you were finished with the video.
So... How much length is it? 5x, 6x the length of the rock? How much would that analogically translate to? 50-60 kilometers? Thats not where moon is to be found. LOL
I'm sorry sir, but you are truly misguided. In what way does this prove that the force of only 10 km of free-falling rock is enough to launch water into space?
The degree in which the water is accelerated is equal to the force divided by the mass of the exiting water. A larger nozzle size = more pressure and more mass. A smaller nozzle size = less pressure and less mass. In the end the acceleration is the same for both.
What were you trying to prove? That a smaller hole in the top of a soda bottle would eject water further than a large hole? You need to experiment with both with controlled constant pressure and accurate measurement. Like thunderfoot did
"Let the real scientists experiment and the textbook scientists misuse science."
So fucking ironic. I'm not into this whole creation-evolution thing, but from what I understand TF has a college degree or Ph.D in science and you're some fat trailer trash who found a chunk of earth and threw it, from a height, at a coke bottle in an attempt to try and discredit an actual scientific model.
And if the water traveled at 11km, which is necessary to escape earth's atmosphere, wouldn't the friction between it and the air heat it up until it evaporates?
This experiment in no way addresses Thunderf00t's point. In order to do so, it should be very easy... let the falling weight of the rock propel an amount of water out of a cannon. Then show that changing the nozzle size will change the maximum height of the water.
Or, even easier, show the calculations showing the potential energy of the water to now be greater than the starting potential energy of the rock.
- you dropped the rock from a higher distance, increasing the potential energy
- Thunderf00t's calculation, being about potential energy is only ever a prediction about VERTICAL displacement (you know, the one that is directly affected by gravity...). The horizontal displacements you measure are therefore irrelevant to the point.
I'd like to repeat this. Can you please provide materials and procedure? I'd also like to know the mass and volume of the rock, the mass and volume of the water, the height from which the rock was dropped, the distance the water went, and the specific predictions you made before the experiment. Too bad you're too lazy(or dishonest) to do science.
This has to be a joke. Someone uses science and known laws (conservation of energy) to refute a claim, then someone responds by dropping rocks and breaking shit? This can't be serious.
the problem is that it was dropped from a certain height (it fell through the air - thus gaining speed/kinetic energy) - put it even higher, it'll gain even more energy.. In the nephies argument there is NO empty space between the water and rock layers- they simply somehow lay on top of the water layer from the beginning. So if there's no empty space in which you can gain that extra speed, you can't get enough energy for the water to exceed 4X. Try putting the rock ON the bottle - see yourself
jesus wore a wig. after he went bald they made him a wig from seaweed, but it was infested with barnacles so they made a new one from straw. then they noticed that all the sheep followed him around all day long. then they noticed all the people followed him just like the sheep. till this day they still follow him around.
@edd77 - black school-shorts work with dark blue shirts. Tho, shorts are hardly my favorites, and you can tell because these are several years old and look new. Also, I normally don't wear black socks and don't make fashion statements.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
another creationist noticed that most of the comments in support of Thunderf00t consists of jibberish, ie "LoL "and that sort of thing - which is just a display of your ignorance and inability to answer physics with physics. There is nothing wrong with the physics that TF believes in - he just failed to calculate in the nozzle effect.
@DebateCrusher Actually i do know about physics. if you read my comment on your "TF pseudoscience" and watch the video i linked you'll see that the "nozzle effect" has no bearing on the height of water spouting from the earth and also this experiment is totally inaccurate. The crust is not floating 15 miles above water in mid air. Of course dropping a heavy ass rock from a great height is going to make the water shoot out further. If you want to see a real experiment look at the link i posted.
@DebateCrusher I think people will respond with physics when you actually use physics. All that was displayed here is your own ignorance on the matter, nothing more.
@DebateCrusher F=m*a , the nozzle effect refers to pressure which is p=F/A (A is area), the nozzle effect says if the area is smaller the pressure increases (increasing acceleration) under the same force. now the problem is if you make the area smaller you basically reduce the mass meaning you reduce the force proportionally to the reducment of the area. all in all the nozzle effect works only on gases and in systems with a supply of force(rock is a single hit of force) HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS FAIL
@DebateCrusher Here's one you haven't thought of though... you applied extra force on that rock, the moment you -threw- it down against the bottle, thus, making this "experiment unvalid, unless you can recount for exactly how much force you applied to the rock
@DebateCrusher It's funny, the physicists are always wrong on physics according to you morons... Do you think that, maybe, ALL OF THE PHYSICS TEACHERS ON THE PLANET saying you're wrong is good enough? I've called 7 college professors, and they all seem to disagree with you. Why do you think that is? It's because you don't have any idea what SCIENCE is. If you start an experiment with a biased premise, you will obtain a biased result.
@DebateCrusher Could you Provide a Mathmatical Formula That a Nozzle effects the distance with?, and thunderfoot allready disproved that it had any effect allready, and he did it with very few tools, simply two bottles, one with a small nozzle, one with a large nozzle, with the same pressure, the liquid went the same distance, at different rates, the larger nozzle just drained itself faster
@DebateCrusher There is no 'nozzle effect'. That would only exist for CONSTANT VOLUME systems.This is a CONSTANT PRESSURE system. The upward force is Surface Area * Pressure. The downward force is Volume* density *gravity.. Since Volume is SA * Height, surface Area is a linear factor on both sides of the equilibrium equation and it cancels out. If you solve for Height, that is the maximum height the water can reach. 1st semester physics stuff. That's why you get a lot of "LOL"'s.
@DebateCrusher: Now that you that you have been informed of the actual physics involved, apologize to TF for calling him a liar. To keep this video up calling him a liar when I have shown you that the real problem is that you do not understand 1st semester physics will be a lie and you, the author of this scientifically inept video, will be the liar. Consider this video crushed.
@TerrencePhillip66 - the heck there is no nozzle effect. NF cited a study made by a scientist in regard to the nozzle effect and even gave the math. Plus TF failed to prove anything because when he videoed the bottles pouring out water he chose angles to which you couldn't measure the difference.
@DebateCrusher The only way a nozzle will increase pressure is if it is a constant volume system. Typically a pump hooked up to a motor that will draw as much current as it needs to maintain a constant angular velocity and therefore a constant flow rate with pressure being a variable. This is not the system described by the 'geysers of the deep' people. It is a constant pressure system. It reaches equilibrium when the water column weighs as much as the rock pressing down on the other side.
And if you dropped the rock from a greater height it would have even more energy to impart to the water. So what? Thunderf00t's argument about potential and kinetic energy doesn't involve layers of rock falling from the sky. It's a simple application of Bernoulli's equation. Please educate yourself before PMing me to watch such a pointless video.
@ozmoroid You know, it would matter. If you took a balloon and filled it with water, and taped bricks on top of it, and then poked a hole into the balloon you have no rocks falling from the sky and you have a spout of water that exceeds 4X. Thunderfoot is a liar who doesn't understand comprehensive physics. Just like you.
@DebateCrusher I've seen a few, but I don't see how that's relevant. I don't misrepresent you, in fact, I really think you act like a fucking asshole, just to be a fucking asshole.
But that aside, you're really going to call someone who is an educator, an advocate of science and education, and most likely possesses an advanced academic degree, a liar? You're going to claim that he doesn't understand comprehensive physics, even though you've stated before, his basic use of physics is accurate?
@DebateCrusher "Exceeds 4X" Yikes. To be relevant to Thunderf00t's analysis: 1) The volume of water needs to equal the volume of the rock, 2) The water needs to RISE (go upward against the force of gravity) more than 4X's the height from which the rock is dropped. PM me know when you've demonstrated that 'cause a Nobel prize awaits you. 8^)
LOL This reminds me of an experiment thiunderfood did in which he tried demonstrating that the flood would only create a single layer. I crushed him by showing him hydrology experiments in a laboratory in The netherlands which proved all of the strata of the earth were created by the flood. 0o
Wow, you're talking about experiments in my same language country. I hope you know there is no Intelligent design there anymore. There were, look at the debate of high professor Cees Dekkers: ID=> Evolution of course. Another huge strawmen presented by you. And it still doesn't explain why the fossils are in different layers and of course: NO METAMORPHIC ROCK (also layered, look at gneiss). It also doesn't explain limestone and the metamorphic version: marble. Made from animals...
@NephilimFree lol.You crushed TFoot? No..you made an assertion...and when asked to back it up with math...you hid...like the uneducated little boy you are. Nephy, why do you let your subscribers think you are a Dr. and have a PhD? Why doh't you correct them and tell them the truth..what your only ecucation is your CORRESPONDENCE training in photography? Why do you want to appear educated when you have admitted you are not. heard u called yourself the "Biggest intellectual on YouTube?" LOL..
Sad. Just admit you and your god were wrong and go on with life.
You're obviously a waste of time. You indoctrinate yourself with lies, create your own world and then go "blahblahblah" when someone tries to explain to you that you're wrong.
GOOD JOB!!!!! You just throwed a rock like more then 4 times the height of the bottle on the water. IS there a fucking huge layer of air between them too? m*g*h. You just quadrupeled the height. HAHAHAHA. Perfect, you just made a fucking huge layer between the supposed water source and the rocks that fall on it. Next movie: lay the rock on the bottle, THAT IS POSSIBLE
What THE FUCK! Yes So is (99%) EVERY SINGLE BINDING ON OUR PLANET. And air is only 21% oxygen. The rest is N2 (nitrogen)(78%) argon (1%) and some minor gasses (CO2, NH4,...). It impossible dumbass, gasses not below water or stone. Do you wna know why it s impossible? Ever seen stone floating on air? If the stone falls on the bttle trough air, then why the fuck would there be air below it o.O
@DebateCrusher This doesn't prove anything, an object will travel far faster through a gas than a liquid, there being oxygen in H2o doesn't mean anything to this experiment because H2o is a liquid. You really need to think out your "experiments" more thoroughly.
@DebateCrusher wait, what? water is not 'composed' of oxygen. not only is it a mere 1 part oxygen in 3, it is also a liquid, not a gas, and thus behaves in a far different manner than pure oxygen with regard to response to transmission of energy and its coefficient of friction, properties which are central to this experiment. this is something a fourteen year-old high school student could tell you.
@DebateCrusher yeah, thats what a great debater would say, "talking to yourself"
shut the fuck up dude and get a clue. lets end it at that. i dont want to waste anymore time with an uneducated moron. i have nothing more to say to an idiot.
@DebateCrusher you remind me of a monkey, jumping up and down throwing feces at the wall, then pointing with a stupid grin and saying: "scientific!!" . And when people laugh at you, you think you've won, cause we have "nothing scientific to add". Let me ask you this: It's pretty obvious from your antics by now, that you know you're full of crap, so why do you persist in playing the monkey? You're obviously not impressing anyone, and what's the point of lying to YOURSELF when you know it's a lie?
Hmm... okay so by this, what do you think you have proven?
This experiment does nothing to help your original argument. The nozzle size increased dramatically, or in this case, it broke. You've assumed that the nozzle size is always going to remain constant. "He said that water couldn't go up past 4X," - are you sure you understand what you're saying? 4X relying on what else? The other factor is height. All you've shown here is gravity is capable of exerting pressure, similar to that of muscle.
Wait, I don't get it. How hight was the rock when it was dropped, and what was the lenght of the farthest water point?
Besides, are you really defending that the crators on the moon came from Nohah's flood? What about the other side of the moon? What about crators on other planets?
@sweatytoothmadman - I think you were mesmerized by TF's obfuscation and puffery. Wakeup. He said that water couldn't go up past 4X. He said that and I used that in my video. He lied.
That was a waste of time. Stupid fuck.
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
stupid fuck
gargoyle1701 6 months ago
SLOPPY science NOTHING to scale....wtf did u prove? that a really big rock dropped from a random height makes a pop bottle go boom? hehe
Treefiddyfo 9 months ago
Wtf. I've seen smarter 4th graders. The stupid never know they are.
MonochromaticEarth 9 months ago
wtf was that.........no calculations no data no science
seonidh 11 months ago
Sooooo you consider yourself a real scientist? As opposed to those "textbook scientists"...damn them, with their facts and all...
MeBeMat 11 months ago 2
Lol FAIL, horizontal velocity as opposed to vertical velocity. So thunderfoot tries to demonstrate conservation of Potential energy, and you fire a bottle HORIZONTALLY
QuantumOverlord 1 year ago 2
Epic Fail, The rock was thrown with force from around (how tall are you?) four foot six and the water achieved a vertical height of around (lets be generous) five or six feet, do you realise how retarded that makes you look? I bet you can count to 20 if you take your socks and shoes off, I also noticed your trainers had laces, who tied them for you?
TheTomtompiper 1 year ago
Well what does this prove exactly. You just crushed a coke bottle filled with water, the only thing this proves is how stupid the theory was to begin with.
slicingwater 1 year ago
The chick at the end of the video said SHAZAM! I say DERP!
I mean this is the funniest shit since that kid who tried to demonstrate the formation of the Grand Canyon with a garden hose.
RandomSnot 1 year ago
how is that a nozzle effect when the water, came not out of the nozzle, but the broken coke bottle? wait... I don't really care.
bansee100 1 year ago
I do not understand what you are trying to demonstrate here. We know that you have a liter of water, but how much does the rock weigh? How far is it supposed to go to demonstrate whatever you are trying to demonstrate?
I am guessing you are trying to demonstrate NephilimFree's moronic idea. Are you sure you are dropping the rock from the right height? You need to isolate more variables.
Just because you call something science does not make it science.
jebus6kryst 1 year ago 3
This proves absolutely nothing, if you are making reference to nephilimfree's challenge to how the moon's craters were formed then you fail to understand that the distance reached with water going horizontally is not equal to the distance which it travels up, your videos prove nothing and are flawed in ways to numerous to list. I honestly pity you
SMTsquidge 1 year ago 2
@DebateCrusher That was a great scientific video - I would love to see Stutterf00t rebutt this one!
mikeet00n 1 year ago
congrats u took a closed system and then opened it by imputing new energy good job your retarted
linkforever92 1 year ago
I hate ad hominems, but look at that raggedy backyard full of weeds, dog s***, busted wood, scrap metal and rocks. dude 0:22 what the hell is that metal frame in the background. and is that trash piled up in the upper right hand corner. and why do you have broken pieces of concrete? i think that is the most water that dead grass has seen in two years. Don't you believe in dumpsters? I bet you didn't even pick up that broken bottle when you were finished with the video.
MsNewnessGrand 1 year ago
So... How much length is it? 5x, 6x the length of the rock? How much would that analogically translate to? 50-60 kilometers? Thats not where moon is to be found. LOL
Wrath0fKhan 1 year ago
DebateCrusher - why won't you approve my video response?
ozmoroid 1 year ago 3
I'm sorry sir, but you are truly misguided. In what way does this prove that the force of only 10 km of free-falling rock is enough to launch water into space?
The degree in which the water is accelerated is equal to the force divided by the mass of the exiting water. A larger nozzle size = more pressure and more mass. A smaller nozzle size = less pressure and less mass. In the end the acceleration is the same for both.
Do you even understand what "F = ma" means?
MSJjoshua 1 year ago
Comment removed
MSJjoshua 1 year ago
This has got to be a joke, right?
falchion49 1 year ago
What were you trying to prove? That a smaller hole in the top of a soda bottle would eject water further than a large hole? You need to experiment with both with controlled constant pressure and accurate measurement. Like thunderfoot did
arrowspoint3 1 year ago
Its been quite a while since I had a good laugh at dc but after this video all I can say is I hope he can get some treatment soon.
Fromanttodugong 1 year ago
I'm gonna die! That was AMAZING!!! :o)
Rock+Bottle=Splat!
Take that thunderf00t!
ThePickyNancy 1 year ago
"Let the real scientists experiment and the textbook scientists misuse science."
So fucking ironic. I'm not into this whole creation-evolution thing, but from what I understand TF has a college degree or Ph.D in science and you're some fat trailer trash who found a chunk of earth and threw it, from a height, at a coke bottle in an attempt to try and discredit an actual scientific model.
FanaticTroll 1 year ago 5
I love the way he didnt show the height from which the rock was dropped. Classic creationism.
automaticSOM 1 year ago
How is this an experiment. You used only one bottle with one nozzle size. How does that prove anything when you have nothing to compare it to.
automaticSOM 1 year ago
That's still pressure and not velocity. Learn the difference, you moron.
autumnsylver 1 year ago
And if the water traveled at 11km, which is necessary to escape earth's atmosphere, wouldn't the friction between it and the air heat it up until it evaporates?
JesterAzazel 1 year ago
I don't get it..
The water that flooded the earth was in an airtight container with only a small opening?
That doesn't seem likely..
JesterAzazel 1 year ago
Um...
This experiment in no way addresses Thunderf00t's point. In order to do so, it should be very easy... let the falling weight of the rock propel an amount of water out of a cannon. Then show that changing the nozzle size will change the maximum height of the water.
Or, even easier, show the calculations showing the potential energy of the water to now be greater than the starting potential energy of the rock.
FiverBeyond 1 year ago
DebateFailure. Driving Believers to atheism one video at a time. . .
impiouspuppy 1 year ago
Two fundamental flaws:
- you dropped the rock from a higher distance, increasing the potential energy
- Thunderf00t's calculation, being about potential energy is only ever a prediction about VERTICAL displacement (you know, the one that is directly affected by gravity...). The horizontal displacements you measure are therefore irrelevant to the point.
uvauva2 1 year ago
I'd like to repeat this. Can you please provide materials and procedure? I'd also like to know the mass and volume of the rock, the mass and volume of the water, the height from which the rock was dropped, the distance the water went, and the specific predictions you made before the experiment. Too bad you're too lazy(or dishonest) to do science.
Riff625 1 year ago
debatecrusher is eh pretty cool guy, he ignores gravitational escape velocity and doesn't afraid of anything
JetpackNinjaDinosaur 1 year ago
Dropping rocks on stuff, now?
Congrats, dude. You've almost made it to the stone age!
Leehofooks 1 year ago
This has to be a joke. Someone uses science and known laws (conservation of energy) to refute a claim, then someone responds by dropping rocks and breaking shit? This can't be serious.
dkramer5 1 year ago
I don't get it???
dontbedifficult1 1 year ago
come on man, you know deep down you are a total loser. I mean don't debate this stuff like you are a 4 year old brat. Grow up a little bit, geez.
philateliceun 1 year ago
This is the funniest shit I've seen in a while.
FonduFyre 1 year ago
@FonduFyre this is the funnisest video around since Theanswersofnwo's Creation Science "Experiment u dhould look it up man if u havent seen it lol
velourkungen 1 year ago
the problem is that it was dropped from a certain height (it fell through the air - thus gaining speed/kinetic energy) - put it even higher, it'll gain even more energy.. In the nephies argument there is NO empty space between the water and rock layers- they simply somehow lay on top of the water layer from the beginning. So if there's no empty space in which you can gain that extra speed, you can't get enough energy for the water to exceed 4X. Try putting the rock ON the bottle - see yourself
imarchello 1 year ago 3
Haha - this indeed is some awesome trolling.
infinit888 1 year ago
The only way I see your idea working is if some how you get a venturi effect.
Pharaoh481 1 year ago
These get more retarded all the time. Then again, that is pretty much why i subscribed.
Keep up the good work, retard.
seyormi 1 year ago 2
Ahahahahahahhahaaaaa!!!!
I threw a rock at a bottle, therfore god.
epic ... just epic.
lupocephalic 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
it's all bullshit.
just be fair and honest and you will be fine.
I HAVE SPOKEN. lardo.
peace.
lardo444 1 year ago
what the fuck did that prove? oh wait i know, it proved that you are an asshole. or a jackass, i can't figure out which one.
peace, lardo.
lardo444 1 year ago
because of that damn wig!!!
lardo444 1 year ago
jesus wore a wig. after he went bald they made him a wig from seaweed, but it was infested with barnacles so they made a new one from straw. then they noticed that all the sheep followed him around all day long. then they noticed all the people followed him just like the sheep. till this day they still follow him around.
peace, lardo.
lardo444 1 year ago
what are you wearing? Black school-shorts and trainers you should have replaced years ago? Wtf? Must be the height of fashion where you are from
edd77 1 year ago
@edd77 - black school-shorts work with dark blue shirts. Tho, shorts are hardly my favorites, and you can tell because these are several years old and look new. Also, I normally don't wear black socks and don't make fashion statements.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
Fantastic!
Now tell us the volume of the rock in relation to the volume of the water?
Nakedhominid 1 year ago
I feel like I needed to take a shower after watching this to help wash the stupid off.
NashvilleKildCountry 1 year ago
lolol this video is pathetic
Peebody 1 year ago 12
search "Scale Test: Nephilimfree`s Moon Hypothesis"
if you want to see how an experiment is actually done. you know, to obey the laws of physics and what have you.
Peebody 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
another creationist noticed that most of the comments in support of Thunderf00t consists of jibberish, ie "LoL "and that sort of thing - which is just a display of your ignorance and inability to answer physics with physics. There is nothing wrong with the physics that TF believes in - he just failed to calculate in the nozzle effect.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher Actually i do know about physics. if you read my comment on your "TF pseudoscience" and watch the video i linked you'll see that the "nozzle effect" has no bearing on the height of water spouting from the earth and also this experiment is totally inaccurate. The crust is not floating 15 miles above water in mid air. Of course dropping a heavy ass rock from a great height is going to make the water shoot out further. If you want to see a real experiment look at the link i posted.
Peebody 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher
Idiot! when the pressure is constant ... ie GRAVITY ... nozzle size is ...
Wait ... why am I bothering?
lupocephalic 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher Please explain "the nozzle effect."
ozmoroid 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher I think people will respond with physics when you actually use physics. All that was displayed here is your own ignorance on the matter, nothing more.
dioseolo 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher F=m*a , the nozzle effect refers to pressure which is p=F/A (A is area), the nozzle effect says if the area is smaller the pressure increases (increasing acceleration) under the same force. now the problem is if you make the area smaller you basically reduce the mass meaning you reduce the force proportionally to the reducment of the area. all in all the nozzle effect works only on gases and in systems with a supply of force(rock is a single hit of force) HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS FAIL
Frikgeek 1 year ago 4
@DebateCrusher "There is nothing wrong with the physics that TF believes in - he just failed to calculate in the nozzle effect. "
.
The "nozzle effect"? Dude, your entire apparatus dissolved. That only proves that this was neither a scaled experiment nor a competent setup.
.
"Water is composed of oxygen. "
.
Yeah, but not gaseous oxygen. That's why it's water and not an explosive mixture of hydrogen and oxygen.
.
This is POE, right? You are just pretending to be a creatard, right?
Noisegator 1 year ago 5
@DebateCrusher Here's one you haven't thought of though... you applied extra force on that rock, the moment you -threw- it down against the bottle, thus, making this "experiment unvalid, unless you can recount for exactly how much force you applied to the rock
bjormika9 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher It's funny, the physicists are always wrong on physics according to you morons... Do you think that, maybe, ALL OF THE PHYSICS TEACHERS ON THE PLANET saying you're wrong is good enough? I've called 7 college professors, and they all seem to disagree with you. Why do you think that is? It's because you don't have any idea what SCIENCE is. If you start an experiment with a biased premise, you will obtain a biased result.
PalulukanMakto 10 months ago
@DebateCrusher Could you Provide a Mathmatical Formula That a Nozzle effects the distance with?, and thunderfoot allready disproved that it had any effect allready, and he did it with very few tools, simply two bottles, one with a small nozzle, one with a large nozzle, with the same pressure, the liquid went the same distance, at different rates, the larger nozzle just drained itself faster
shadow11479 10 months ago
@DebateCrusher There is no 'nozzle effect'. That would only exist for CONSTANT VOLUME systems.This is a CONSTANT PRESSURE system. The upward force is Surface Area * Pressure. The downward force is Volume* density *gravity.. Since Volume is SA * Height, surface Area is a linear factor on both sides of the equilibrium equation and it cancels out. If you solve for Height, that is the maximum height the water can reach. 1st semester physics stuff. That's why you get a lot of "LOL"'s.
TerrencePhillip66 9 months ago
@DebateCrusher: Now that you that you have been informed of the actual physics involved, apologize to TF for calling him a liar. To keep this video up calling him a liar when I have shown you that the real problem is that you do not understand 1st semester physics will be a lie and you, the author of this scientifically inept video, will be the liar. Consider this video crushed.
TerrencePhillip66 9 months ago
@TerrencePhillip66 - the heck there is no nozzle effect. NF cited a study made by a scientist in regard to the nozzle effect and even gave the math. Plus TF failed to prove anything because when he videoed the bottles pouring out water he chose angles to which you couldn't measure the difference.
DebateCrusher 9 months ago
@DebateCrusher The only way a nozzle will increase pressure is if it is a constant volume system. Typically a pump hooked up to a motor that will draw as much current as it needs to maintain a constant angular velocity and therefore a constant flow rate with pressure being a variable. This is not the system described by the 'geysers of the deep' people. It is a constant pressure system. It reaches equilibrium when the water column weighs as much as the rock pressing down on the other side.
TerrencePhillip66 9 months ago
And if you dropped the rock from a greater height it would have even more energy to impart to the water. So what? Thunderf00t's argument about potential and kinetic energy doesn't involve layers of rock falling from the sky. It's a simple application of Bernoulli's equation. Please educate yourself before PMing me to watch such a pointless video.
ozmoroid 1 year ago 3
@ozmoroid You know, it would matter. If you took a balloon and filled it with water, and taped bricks on top of it, and then poked a hole into the balloon you have no rocks falling from the sky and you have a spout of water that exceeds 4X. Thunderfoot is a liar who doesn't understand comprehensive physics. Just like you.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher I've seen a few, but I don't see how that's relevant. I don't misrepresent you, in fact, I really think you act like a fucking asshole, just to be a fucking asshole.
But that aside, you're really going to call someone who is an educator, an advocate of science and education, and most likely possesses an advanced academic degree, a liar? You're going to claim that he doesn't understand comprehensive physics, even though you've stated before, his basic use of physics is accurate?
CitizenRare 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher "Exceeds 4X" Yikes. To be relevant to Thunderf00t's analysis: 1) The volume of water needs to equal the volume of the rock, 2) The water needs to RISE (go upward against the force of gravity) more than 4X's the height from which the rock is dropped. PM me know when you've demonstrated that 'cause a Nobel prize awaits you. 8^)
ozmoroid 1 year ago 4
LOL This reminds me of an experiment thiunderfood did in which he tried demonstrating that the flood would only create a single layer. I crushed him by showing him hydrology experiments in a laboratory in The netherlands which proved all of the strata of the earth were created by the flood. 0o
NephilimFree 1 year ago
@NephilimFree You seem to use the word "crush" loosely. Do you have a crush on thunderf00t?
pendulousphallus 1 year ago
@pendulousphallus - you're a failure just like you're name.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher You used the wrong "your".
pendulousphallus 1 year ago 2
@NephilimFree
Wow, you're talking about experiments in my same language country. I hope you know there is no Intelligent design there anymore. There were, look at the debate of high professor Cees Dekkers: ID=> Evolution of course. Another huge strawmen presented by you. And it still doesn't explain why the fossils are in different layers and of course: NO METAMORPHIC ROCK (also layered, look at gneiss). It also doesn't explain limestone and the metamorphic version: marble. Made from animals...
fartedbananas 1 year ago
@NephilimFree lol.You crushed TFoot? No..you made an assertion...and when asked to back it up with math...you hid...like the uneducated little boy you are. Nephy, why do you let your subscribers think you are a Dr. and have a PhD? Why doh't you correct them and tell them the truth..what your only ecucation is your CORRESPONDENCE training in photography? Why do you want to appear educated when you have admitted you are not. heard u called yourself the "Biggest intellectual on YouTube?" LOL..
MrJmm999 1 year ago
@MrJmm999
IF Neph is so bright, why hasn't he falsified evolution like he says? Why hasn't he won the nobel prize? Why hasn't he written a paper falsifying it?
edd77 1 year ago
@NephilimFree Hydrology... or philology?
Leehofooks 1 year ago
@NephilimFree
Sad. Just admit you and your god were wrong and go on with life.
You're obviously a waste of time. You indoctrinate yourself with lies, create your own world and then go "blahblahblah" when someone tries to explain to you that you're wrong.
FanaticTroll 1 year ago
rofl
trailer park scientist FTW.
NeigeNoSora 1 year ago 6
What was the point of this?
TheKitch2 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't believe this, not only are these Atheists unable to come up with a scientific response, they can't even spell correctly!
N00bcrunch3r 1 year ago
@N00bcrunch3r yes, the atheist can't even spell. Typical Thunderf00t follower. Never questions.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher Did you even read any of what I said? Or are you just here to act like a total fucking asshole?
CitizenRare 1 year ago 2
@CitizenRare - I could ask you the same. Do you actually watch my videos? And if you do why do you misrepresent me?
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher
GOOD JOB!!!!! You just throwed a rock like more then 4 times the height of the bottle on the water. IS there a fucking huge layer of air between them too? m*g*h. You just quadrupeled the height. HAHAHAHA. Perfect, you just made a fucking huge layer between the supposed water source and the rocks that fall on it. Next movie: lay the rock on the bottle, THAT IS POSSIBLE
fartedbananas 1 year ago 9
@fartedbananas - why not? Water is composed of oxygen.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher
What THE FUCK! Yes So is (99%) EVERY SINGLE BINDING ON OUR PLANET. And air is only 21% oxygen. The rest is N2 (nitrogen)(78%) argon (1%) and some minor gasses (CO2, NH4,...). It impossible dumbass, gasses not below water or stone. Do you wna know why it s impossible? Ever seen stone floating on air? If the stone falls on the bttle trough air, then why the fuck would there be air below it o.O
fartedbananas 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher This doesn't prove anything, an object will travel far faster through a gas than a liquid, there being oxygen in H2o doesn't mean anything to this experiment because H2o is a liquid. You really need to think out your "experiments" more thoroughly.
upinthestratosphere 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher wait, what? water is not 'composed' of oxygen. not only is it a mere 1 part oxygen in 3, it is also a liquid, not a gas, and thus behaves in a far different manner than pure oxygen with regard to response to transmission of energy and its coefficient of friction, properties which are central to this experiment. this is something a fourteen year-old high school student could tell you.
hellbirdsflight 1 year ago
Oh boy, I'm sure he's shaking in his thunderb00ts now...
pendulousphallus 1 year ago
@pendulousphallus - he sure is.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
oh man, what a jerk! get a clue dude.
lardo444 1 year ago
@lardo444 - talking to your self again? Better heed your own advice.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher yeah, thats what a great debater would say, "talking to yourself"
shut the fuck up dude and get a clue. lets end it at that. i dont want to waste anymore time with an uneducated moron. i have nothing more to say to an idiot.
peace, lardo.
lardo444 1 year ago
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Magic187u 1 year ago
@Magic187u - when you have nothing scientific to add to the discussion - meaning your ideas are bankrupt.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher you remind me of a monkey, jumping up and down throwing feces at the wall, then pointing with a stupid grin and saying: "scientific!!" . And when people laugh at you, you think you've won, cause we have "nothing scientific to add". Let me ask you this: It's pretty obvious from your antics by now, that you know you're full of crap, so why do you persist in playing the monkey? You're obviously not impressing anyone, and what's the point of lying to YOURSELF when you know it's a lie?
MrSolomonsNonEffect 1 year ago 3
Hmm... okay so by this, what do you think you have proven?
This experiment does nothing to help your original argument. The nozzle size increased dramatically, or in this case, it broke. You've assumed that the nozzle size is always going to remain constant. "He said that water couldn't go up past 4X," - are you sure you understand what you're saying? 4X relying on what else? The other factor is height. All you've shown here is gravity is capable of exerting pressure, similar to that of muscle.
CitizenRare 1 year ago
@CitizenRare - Gravity acts like mucles? You're on to something but didn't have that ah ha experience.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
Sad. Just admit you're wrong and go on with life.
noonespecia2007 1 year ago 2
@noonespecia2007 - very scientific response.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
How sad for you that you can't understand what ThunderF00t is putting across.
bigboy45454545 1 year ago 2
Wait, I don't get it. How hight was the rock when it was dropped, and what was the lenght of the farthest water point?
Besides, are you really defending that the crators on the moon came from Nohah's flood? What about the other side of the moon? What about crators on other planets?
DansLookingGlass 1 year ago
I don't think you have any remote understand of what Thunderf00t argument is.
sweatytoothmadman 1 year ago 2
@sweatytoothmadman - I think you were mesmerized by TF's obfuscation and puffery. Wakeup. He said that water couldn't go up past 4X. He said that and I used that in my video. He lied.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
The only thing you crushed was a Coke bottle.
kingsdun 1 year ago 38
@kingsdun - that was bright.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher And incredibly accurate!!
impiouspuppy 1 year ago