I agree with poopingeneral (can't stop laughing at myself), but screen name aside, poopingeneral is correct. The audio sound technical quality of a YouTube recording is what I consider first, then the performance.
Well there are 29 likes to one dislike so that sort of speaks for itself I think though we must take into account that there are several experts here ! all part of the 'informed' brigade I imagine. I loved the bad fingering comment best.
@woofer32 It wasn't bad, but wasn't good. The cheat of cutting the last 12 bars was the final insult. I was very surprised to hear applause at the conclusion, as I assuned he was in the early stages of learning the piece.
Glory be to God! Read these comments. Organists (or those who fancy themselves such) can be such testy sarcastic bitches! Pipe Queens, the lot of them!
@KHallUSNSCC ..... OMG! I so agree...this organist SUX big time!! must be some pimply-faced teenager who didn't practice until about an hour before the recording was made! ICK!
@ncantores now....I've seen some "terrible" comments on Youtube over the years...but your comment bugged me so bad, I had to respond. This persons playing is nice, and actually very good compared to many other people. Unless if your playing is better, I suggest you keep the unfriendly comments to yourself. No hard feelings either....
@poopingeneral I agree its is not bad at all and I could also listen to more with great warmth and pleasure. Thank you for saying what I would have said.
@Chesterbarnes1 I don't like criticizing anyone, but I just had to say it. At least you do appreciate the organ and the organist for what they are, bad or good.
@poopingeneral ..... you're on CRACKCOCAINE if you really think for ONE second this is actually good! it's HORRIBLE!! I sure the clown playing this didn't get paid and was only doing it as a favor to someone! Lord Almighty it's BAD
@kerryincolumbus again, it's not that BAD, as you've pawned it out to be. Listen closely, he misses a few notes, but keeps the rhythm, and uses his registration and stops very well. So overall on a 1 through 10 scale I'd rate about 6 maybe 7. I've heard a lot worse!!!!
hawaii, and poop, go get a room.
1888bfs 3 weeks ago
I agree with poopingeneral (can't stop laughing at myself), but screen name aside, poopingeneral is correct. The audio sound technical quality of a YouTube recording is what I consider first, then the performance.
hawaiianmaile 1 month ago
Well there are 29 likes to one dislike so that sort of speaks for itself I think though we must take into account that there are several experts here ! all part of the 'informed' brigade I imagine. I loved the bad fingering comment best.
woofer32 1 month ago
@woofer32 It wasn't bad, but wasn't good. The cheat of cutting the last 12 bars was the final insult. I was very surprised to hear applause at the conclusion, as I assuned he was in the early stages of learning the piece.
gordorgan 2 weeks ago
Glory be to God! Read these comments. Organists (or those who fancy themselves such) can be such testy sarcastic bitches! Pipe Queens, the lot of them!
DHS11999 2 months ago
Hope this organist doesn't lose his day job.......Maybe I am spoiled as Virgil Fox was a personal friend....He would roll over at this......
KHallUSNSCC 2 months ago
@KHallUSNSCC ..... OMG! I so agree...this organist SUX big time!! must be some pimply-faced teenager who didn't practice until about an hour before the recording was made! ICK!
kerryincolumbus 1 month ago
It´s terrible, out of time... bad fingering... bad notes... is a very beautiful organ but... what a bad organist...
ensamblesanagustin 2 months ago
sounds wonderful to me. Impossible to please everybody.
dandygancer 3 months ago
Oh, come on, I've heard much worse.
wurlitzer3 3 months ago
hey ive seen this organ in a drawing my great grandpa casavant made
austinisboss1 3 months ago
what a terrible organist...
ncantores 3 months ago 2
@ncantores now....I've seen some "terrible" comments on Youtube over the years...but your comment bugged me so bad, I had to respond. This persons playing is nice, and actually very good compared to many other people. Unless if your playing is better, I suggest you keep the unfriendly comments to yourself. No hard feelings either....
poopingeneral 2 months ago
@poopingeneral I agree its is not bad at all and I could also listen to more with great warmth and pleasure. Thank you for saying what I would have said.
Chesterbarnes1 2 months ago
@Chesterbarnes1 I don't like criticizing anyone, but I just had to say it. At least you do appreciate the organ and the organist for what they are, bad or good.
poopingeneral 2 months ago
@poopingeneral ..... you're on CRACKCOCAINE if you really think for ONE second this is actually good! it's HORRIBLE!! I sure the clown playing this didn't get paid and was only doing it as a favor to someone! Lord Almighty it's BAD
kerryincolumbus 1 month ago
@kerryincolumbus again, it's not that BAD, as you've pawned it out to be. Listen closely, he misses a few notes, but keeps the rhythm, and uses his registration and stops very well. So overall on a 1 through 10 scale I'd rate about 6 maybe 7. I've heard a lot worse!!!!
poopingeneral 1 month ago
It would have been very nice to see the ORGAN console, since that was the billed main feature! Let's try this again please.
Chesterbarnes1 5 months ago
Sounds soo beautiful, but too fast maybe?
Kisses4U2Night 5 months ago
@Kisses4U2Night caused by the Acoustic of the church... but the Tempo is good for other churches...
TheKahlus 5 months ago