ESA birthday card' of Apollo 11 landing site This image, taken by the advanced Moon Imaging Experiment (AMIE) on board ESA’s SMART-1 spacecraft, shows the Apollo 11 landing site in the Mare Tranquillitatis on the Moon.
w w w . esa . int / SPECIALS /ESAhistory/SEMBB90P0WF_0.html
Indian Probe Takes Clear Photo of Apollo 15, Hopefully Smashing Conspiracy Theories Forever. This image was one of the last photographs sent by Chandrayaan-1, the moon probe that stopped communicating with Earth last Saturday. It clearly shows the Apollo 15 rover tracks on the Moon surface.
h t t p : / / gizmodo . com / 5352410 / indian-probe-takes-clear-photo¬-of-apollo-15-hopefully-smashing-conspiracy-theories-forever
Against the conspiracy. The lunar probe Kaguya Selene, in 2008, it found all of the Apollo landing sites. website of Japans Space Agency (JAXA).
w w w . jaxa . jp / search _ e .html?cx = 009266628361095407450%3A93dsxetmy8s&co f= FORID%3A11&ie = ISO-8859-1&oe = ISO-8859-1&q = apollo&sa = Pesquisa&siteurl = w w w . jaxa . jp %2Findex _ e . html
@wizzy812 The sound that you claim has been the microphone of the astronauts inside the lunar module. It is their unwillingness or stupidity? Never used in a closed environment? They were so! Has pictures of the sites landing of all Apollo lunar probe Japan, India and ESA. More LRO. You lose your time.
@aczjbr I've never doubted the moon landings. A Navy Seal friend of mine opened the Apollo 13 capsule when it splashed down. But sometimes I've wondered if there were times NASA couldn't get some good shots and so made a few in a studio.
@wizzy812 Ah! So sorry. His friend took part in the story. And that his statement was very offensive. I'm a fan of space exploration in Brazil, thanks to God, universities, research centers and who knows what happened studied. Now you can confirm with the photos. Have you seen the videos of the LRO and Kaguya? Have a good Sunday
This video is the result of Eugene Cernan leaving the LRV car keys for the Moon Maiden, who drove the LRV back, from a mile away, to within 100ft of the accent stage! I'll bet he hasn't forgotten his keys, since!
There is, absolutely, no way, this video was shot from the Lunar surface, with a Hasselblad camera, from one mile away, on the LRV! Have you tried a telephoto of an object a mile away? 40+years of BS!! This video could not have been taken from more than 100 ft. away, and in a studio, nonetheless!! I think it appropriate to ask E.C., and the other props for all the money they have made over the last 40 years in covering up this mass illusion?
@SWWDED The camera was operated remotely from Houston by a fellow named Ed Fendell. Stars aren't visible because the camera's exposure settings were made for viewing the LM and the moonscape - bright objects that wouldn't allow the stars to be seen. Imagine trying to take a picture of the stars using the same aperture and shutter speed as a picture of a brightly lit landscape. You can't do it. That's the situation here.
@SWWDED ha ha, what an idiot. how about we use a little common sense. nasa controlled the camera on the rover by remote control. To answer the stars question, during the daylight you cant see stars with your eyes or cameras on the earth because light from the sun, reflecting off objects on earth is too bright. The stars are still there, they dont go away. Same on the moon. 12 men walked on the moon because thousands worked so hard to get them there. Doubters, stop kidding yourselves.
@lol666 Hey child: I am seeing our culture being TOO gender neutral. In 25 years am I going to hear little kids like you ask questions like: Was it men or women who landed on the Moon? Too me it is history revision and children like you are not learning anything but an agenda.
Look at lift off where you see the blast from the thrusters, but when the craft is looked at from below, there is no indication of ignition and thrust rockets... :O
WTH !!!
Also, kift off looks like the craft is hanging from a crane, with lack of linear acceleration.
@dpoussou Your comment is one of the dumbest I have seen yet,if you do some simple research on the repellents they used to lift of from the moon you not going to see any plume from the rocket(accent stage) NO AIR.As for your comment about hanging from a crane i'm not even going there..
@dpoussou you my friend are gay thers no air u cant get any indication only the pwoder of the rock on the ground that spreads a little but thats bearly nothing nothing
and another thing... we have telescops that can see on mars, but we can't see a better picture of the moon? in better resolution?... all I want is too see in real time (not recorded) the remainings of the space module... or a flag, or a "eva xx"... and don't tell me that is technical impossible... we have the technology... what do we miss?
look at second 33... w.t-f. blew out of the module... and why in all directions... I had the feeling I was waching a low budget sf movie from the 60's... com'on nasa... you have money... do an update on that special effect...
People are so dumb. The moon is not that hard of a target to hit. 1/4 million miles is right nextdoor in our galaxy. Gimmie $30,000 and a used Saturn V and I'll be there in a week, sitting in the white sand, drinking schnapps out of a moonboot.
If the crater lifted off the lunar surface, who was still stay on the moon to film the action? Do you beleive the NASA planed to play golf on the moon? It was very funny.
Why cant we see any star? sky looks grey, should be black, if it is grey is because the camera is adjust to it but the stars should be seen. At 2:45 there is some moving piece at the legs of the lunar lander, What is it? why does it stop moving suddently??
You have to remember this was taken in 1972. They didn't have the best quality cameras back then. I'm sure you would have gotten the same results trying to film the night sky here on earth.
Video cameras have 1-100 contrast range (back then). Lunar soil and start have a 1 to 10,000 contrast range. No stars could ever be seen even with today's cameras.
Yeahh who the hell manipulates it? Lets supose that it is manipulated by someone on earth... there would be 2 seconds delay because of the distance.... weird isnt it?
Camera was of low bandwidth, and not a tv camera used at a local tv station. Plus, it used a color wheel spinning in secquence with ground based equipment to bring out the color. That is why at liftoff, there are multiple colors of the Mylar foil being blown to shreads from the descent stage of the lunar module.
ESA birthday card' of Apollo 11 landing site This image, taken by the advanced Moon Imaging Experiment (AMIE) on board ESA’s SMART-1 spacecraft, shows the Apollo 11 landing site in the Mare Tranquillitatis on the Moon.
w w w . esa . int / SPECIALS /ESAhistory/SEMBB90P0WF_0.html
aczjbr 1 week ago
Indian Probe Takes Clear Photo of Apollo 15, Hopefully Smashing Conspiracy Theories Forever. This image was one of the last photographs sent by Chandrayaan-1, the moon probe that stopped communicating with Earth last Saturday. It clearly shows the Apollo 15 rover tracks on the Moon surface.
h t t p : / / gizmodo . com / 5352410 / indian-probe-takes-clear-photo¬-of-apollo-15-hopefully-smashing-conspiracy-theories-forever
aczjbr 1 week ago
Against the conspiracy. The lunar probe Kaguya Selene, in 2008, it found all of the Apollo landing sites. website of Japans Space Agency (JAXA).
w w w . jaxa . jp / search _ e .html?cx = 009266628361095407450%3A93dsxetmy8s&co f= FORID%3A11&ie = ISO-8859-1&oe = ISO-8859-1&q = apollo&sa = Pesquisa&siteurl = w w w . jaxa . jp %2Findex _ e . html
aczjbr 1 week ago
Can you guys hear the blast off? Sound doesn't travel in space
wizzy812 1 month ago
@wizzy812 The sound that you claim has been the microphone of the astronauts inside the lunar module. It is their unwillingness or stupidity? Never used in a closed environment? They were so! Has pictures of the sites landing of all Apollo lunar probe Japan, India and ESA. More LRO. You lose your time.
aczjbr 1 week ago
@aczjbr I've never doubted the moon landings. A Navy Seal friend of mine opened the Apollo 13 capsule when it splashed down. But sometimes I've wondered if there were times NASA couldn't get some good shots and so made a few in a studio.
wizzy812 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wizzy812 Ah! So sorry. His friend took part in the story. And that his statement was very offensive. I'm a fan of space exploration in Brazil, thanks to God, universities, research centers and who knows what happened studied. Now you can confirm with the photos. Have you seen the videos of the LRO and Kaguya? Have a good Sunday
aczjbr 1 week ago
This video is the result of Eugene Cernan leaving the LRV car keys for the Moon Maiden, who drove the LRV back, from a mile away, to within 100ft of the accent stage! I'll bet he hasn't forgotten his keys, since!
uncometeorites 2 months ago
There is, absolutely, no way, this video was shot from the Lunar surface, with a Hasselblad camera, from one mile away, on the LRV! Have you tried a telephoto of an object a mile away? 40+years of BS!! This video could not have been taken from more than 100 ft. away, and in a studio, nonetheless!! I think it appropriate to ask E.C., and the other props for all the money they have made over the last 40 years in covering up this mass illusion?
uncometeorites 2 months ago
If the last humans ever on the moon just left... who was manning the camera? and where are the stars on the horizon?
SWWDED 11 months ago
@SWWDED The camera was operated remotely from Houston by a fellow named Ed Fendell. Stars aren't visible because the camera's exposure settings were made for viewing the LM and the moonscape - bright objects that wouldn't allow the stars to be seen. Imagine trying to take a picture of the stars using the same aperture and shutter speed as a picture of a brightly lit landscape. You can't do it. That's the situation here.
roamingcroat 10 months ago
@SWWDED ha ha, what an idiot. how about we use a little common sense. nasa controlled the camera on the rover by remote control. To answer the stars question, during the daylight you cant see stars with your eyes or cameras on the earth because light from the sun, reflecting off objects on earth is too bright. The stars are still there, they dont go away. Same on the moon. 12 men walked on the moon because thousands worked so hard to get them there. Doubters, stop kidding yourselves.
launchsquid 8 months ago
@SWWDED See the description: "Taken from the remote control camera on the lunar rover."
hihi581 2 months ago
Sure would be nice to return there one day in the future. I guess only people watching this video can understand me, what a dream that is.
ParaglidingManiac 1 year ago
Humans? I thought they were men, Oh that right. We have to show gender sensitivity now. Even if it means a LIE.
PhantomMaster101 1 year ago
@PhantomMaster101 men are humans Dumbass
lol666 1 year ago
@lol666 Hey child: I am seeing our culture being TOO gender neutral. In 25 years am I going to hear little kids like you ask questions like: Was it men or women who landed on the Moon? Too me it is history revision and children like you are not learning anything but an agenda.
PhantomMaster101 1 year ago
that dangles on a Challenger in the range from 2:43 to 2:53?
AngelRasko 1 year ago
Hmmm damn this looks FAKE !!
Look at lift off where you see the blast from the thrusters, but when the craft is looked at from below, there is no indication of ignition and thrust rockets... :O
WTH !!!
Also, kift off looks like the craft is hanging from a crane, with lack of linear acceleration.
Very fishy if you ask me...
dpoussou 1 year ago
@dpoussou ofc not they where in space..
TuskenRaider80 1 year ago
@dpoussou you fuck wit
alienhunter36 1 year ago
@alienhunter36 thanks man,that's what your mom said too
dpoussou 1 year ago
@dpoussou Your comment is one of the dumbest I have seen yet,if you do some simple research on the repellents they used to lift of from the moon you not going to see any plume from the rocket(accent stage) NO AIR.As for your comment about hanging from a crane i'm not even going there..
alienhunter36 1 year ago
@dpoussou you my friend are gay thers no air u cant get any indication only the pwoder of the rock on the ground that spreads a little but thats bearly nothing nothing
Icelikereflexes 1 year ago
haha see you on the surface of mars in 2050... bollywood-animated ;-)
Patriol666 1 year ago
the blast ,it looks fake , like computer animated
Sonicku 2 years ago
and another thing... we have telescops that can see on mars, but we can't see a better picture of the moon? in better resolution?... all I want is too see in real time (not recorded) the remainings of the space module... or a flag, or a "eva xx"... and don't tell me that is technical impossible... we have the technology... what do we miss?
danielpreda1981 2 years ago
Look up Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
ugowar 2 years ago
@danielpreda1981 You think your smarter than rocket scientists? Why don't you set it up?
UphyXx 2 years ago
look at second 33... w.t-f. blew out of the module... and why in all directions... I had the feeling I was waching a low budget sf movie from the 60's... com'on nasa... you have money... do an update on that special effect...
danielpreda1981 2 years ago
It was bits of blown mylar from the LM.
07yensid 2 years ago
People are so dumb. The moon is not that hard of a target to hit. 1/4 million miles is right nextdoor in our galaxy. Gimmie $30,000 and a used Saturn V and I'll be there in a week, sitting in the white sand, drinking schnapps out of a moonboot.
Richardddoobies 2 years ago
If the crater lifted off the lunar surface, who was still stay on the moon to film the action? Do you beleive the NASA planed to play golf on the moon? It was very funny.
vietpham61 2 years ago
If you read the info on the site, it clearly says: Taken from the remote control camera on the lunar rover.
westfourtwenty 2 years ago 3
If you read the info on the side, it clearly says "Taken from the remote control camera on the lunar rover."
westfourtwenty 2 years ago 2
this picture is taken from remote camera of Rover, u dombass
kalpeshwaghela87 2 years ago 2
Remote control camera on the lunar rover.
FakeSickProductions 2 years ago 3
Like the video says, shot by the remote camera on the rover.
bd048 2 years ago 3
Why cant we see any star? sky looks grey, should be black, if it is grey is because the camera is adjust to it but the stars should be seen. At 2:45 there is some moving piece at the legs of the lunar lander, What is it? why does it stop moving suddently??
batty256 2 years ago
You have to remember this was taken in 1972. They didn't have the best quality cameras back then. I'm sure you would have gotten the same results trying to film the night sky here on earth.
westfourtwenty 2 years ago
Video cameras have 1-100 contrast range (back then). Lunar soil and start have a 1 to 10,000 contrast range. No stars could ever be seen even with today's cameras.
bd048 2 years ago 3
Stars take 3 minutes of exposure time. Lunar soil take 1/500 of a second. Gee, why no stars? Come on!
bd048 2 years ago
sucks for you
DJBertz94 2 years ago
the camera have a motion tracker in 1972?
exitido 2 years ago
Yeahh who the hell manipulates it? Lets supose that it is manipulated by someone on earth... there would be 2 seconds delay because of the distance.... weird isnt it?
batty256 2 years ago
There were constant instances of over panning or tilting from the 2 second delay. Watch all the DVDs from this stuff.
bd048 2 years ago
Camera was of low bandwidth, and not a tv camera used at a local tv station. Plus, it used a color wheel spinning in secquence with ground based equipment to bring out the color. That is why at liftoff, there are multiple colors of the Mylar foil being blown to shreads from the descent stage of the lunar module.
GaryW48 2 years ago
I am speechless, what a sad and simultaneously breathtaking sight to see the last human beings leave the lunar surface...
Tijger2099 2 years ago 7
Did you see them get into that tin pot?
LordInksworth 2 years ago
Nailed it despite the four second delay in controlling the camera. Beautiful!
TheCanadianPublic 2 years ago 8