HUMAN 2.0 - CREATING GODS pt.5

[MartinStarFlash]

huhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhu­huhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhu­h

[dreadwing93]

Let's party! huhuhuhuhuhu....

[SailorBarsoom]

There's nothing heroic about blowing the arms off of secretaries, which is what the unabomber did.

[nicolanthon25]

everything has it's advantages and disadvantages. when scientists finally realize the power of transhumanism and/or artillect, i hope these scientists and the future scientists will use that power responsibly... or else, what we built will one day destroy us, its creators.

[ZZAKON]

Wont.

[4everkeim]

I promise you all that someday the uni-bomber will NOT be considered a hero, but as a desctructive person who thought he was doing the right thing in his delusional world view.

[Jacory069]

his laugh is gay

[mortenrobinson]

Wow, now that's a mad scientist!

[umum96]

the only reason i looked for this video was because of 3:47

[Intangent]

Pof. Lloyd's laugh echoes in my nightmare's.

huhuhuhuhuhuhuh.......

[SolRosenberg84]

His laugh is awesome.

huhuhuhuhuhuhuhuh...

[nemesisnick66]

huhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhu

[nemesisnick66]

there not impossible just improbable as religion will probably do everything it possibly can to fight against such advances.

[adnmoh1]

lloyd is awesome

[oussora]

Nobody can beat the A-team,the Quantum computer

is DOOMED.

[vsimoul]

i understand that quantum systems may be in many states at the same time, but is it not true that when you try to observe their state you "force" them to one?

isn't that like destroying it's multiprocessing power?

[thErusteDbunnY]

maybe someone else can answer this better than i can, but all that "matters" is the answer/result/output, which means that the calculation can be performed without watching the process of calculating it.

[vsimoul]

thnx a lot for the reply, i was really waiting to get an answer on this one!

what you are saying is interesting, i 'll read about it a bit more because i don't completely get it

[gtralisfr69]

by the way, whats up with Lloyd at 3:45

[EmmeJayKay]

I enjoyed it very much. Thank you for uploading it.

[gtralisfr69]

Silly humans. Smarterchild is only the beggining!

[DeimosSaturn]

I've read conversations with niel's brain, if that's what you mean. No one has yet to map the neurons of the human brain at ANY resolution. AI is NOT based on any organic neurology. Regardless, humans will recursively self improve before pure artificials ever do. Get it through your head.

[DeimosSaturn]

How our mind works=human intelligence. Quite clear to you because you don't make any sense to begin with.

The code used to build the behaviors and responses in robots are organic because they evolve the program through natural selection. It's not modelled on ANYTHING because we can't model how brains work...not yet anyway.

[DeimosSaturn]

Oh brother. The very first AIs were "evolved" to have instincts for balance. EVERY AI will be pure instinct until it developes self awareness. That's just a fact of reality. Go talk to some robot builders or something.

"ai isn't modeled after our intelligence, but how our mind works." OH! Thanks for clearing that up...*shakes head*

[DeimosSaturn]

We will only understand how to create an intelligence only after we understand intelligence...OUR intelligence is what the AI will be modelled on. The self preservation instinct is the single cause for our "primal" nature, and self preservation will be an instinct the AIs possess.

This is proof that AI will be malevolent. Fortunately, having thoroughly unlocked the enigma of the brain, we will always be superior.

[DeimosSaturn]

There is evidence to support that. Humans are smarter than every other animal, as a result, we kill any animal (in some cultures) without a second thought (dolphins and elephants included).

Now the point I made about the EEG was that when that technology works downstream (the computer feeding data into the brain through the skin) it will lead to recursive self improvement.

[DeimosSaturn]

Do you know what an electro encephalogram is? It measures brainwaves through the scalp. No surgery involved. A higher resolution and less cumbersome version is in developement.

We will remain human as long as we choose to. Some will become malevolent, others benevolent. With a machine, it's more likely to be malevolent, so they will always remain inferior.

[DeimosSaturn]

GE is basically nowhere? Wow...just wow. You obviously have not done your homework in regards to GE so I'll let it slide. The same genes in different people do the same thing. It's as simple as that.

Humans will be the first entity to recursively improve it's intelligence. There's simply no debate.

[DeimosSaturn]

That idea is laughable to the degree of religion. There is no way to say that every human brain is so identical that any hardware can be grafted to seemlessly integrate with any human. Each device would have to be customized and wont be realitically commercial until an advanced nano or micromachine singularity occurs (far later than a GE singularity).

[DeimosSaturn]

You are splitting hairs here. A cyborg is NOT a human and I'm not implying the singularity will be a cyborg either. It will be a FULLY ORGANIC human although genetically modified.

[DeimosSaturn]

He's a fucking idiot because robots will never be superior to humans. Humans will always be the superior intelligence on this earth. The vinge singularity will be a human, not a machine.

[DeimosSaturn]

That asshole thinks The Unibomber is a hero? He's been watching The Matrix too many times.

[OsyenVyeter]

Computers are already superior to the human mind in many ways. I know its not exactly the best metaphor in the world but theres machines that could kick your butt in chess, a calculator can calculate faster than you. But of course these are specific machines who have basically one designated job and thus excell at it, but the point remains. And eventually we'll be able to have a machine that exceeds us in all aspects, its just a matter of foresight to see it comming.

[DeimosSaturn]

Correction: computers are only superior to the human mind in narrow ways. The most powerful supercomputers can only simulate a 50 neuron network of a mouse brain. Once the code to the brain is broken, we will have simultaneously learned to recursively self improve ourselves, beating the inorganics to the punch.

[EmmeJayKay]

It's a sort of hit-and-miss. Brains are excellent at pattern recognition, computers are not. Chess computers can only play chess, a narrow intelligence.

If we could get a program that can play checkers well and then take the software guts and go learn how to play chess, or some other arbitrary chess-like board game - an artificial *general* intelligence - then we would have a huge milestone. The point is near.

[conoba]

Ha, optimists.

[bazookajordan]

I'm sure you'd recieve the same reaction you gave from most people if you tried to describe the current technology to someone 50 or 60 years ago.

[installcd]

hohohoho