Footprints show tetrapods walked on land 18m years earlier than thought according to Fossil footprints found in southern poland lead to a radical rethink of the evolution of the first four-legged animals or 'tetrapods'
Until now, experts had believed that the earliest tetrapod fossils are 375 million years old
However, the footprint tracks are 10 million years older than the oldest elpistostegid body fossils. Suggesting they are NOT transitional forms.
I saw it on national geographic. Its about darwin and its evolution theory.and transitional fossils.And over how an disturbingly big group of people are very wrong.
yeah, it's arguable that every fossil or living being is a transition from what once was and what some day will be, but this is more in reference to "bridging" the gap between the taxonomic groups beyond species.
This story is one of those featured in the early chapters of Shubin's book "Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body"
It's not just stories about finding fossils, but really explores our connections with our ancestors. I'm enjoying it a lot. Readable but not patronising.
I have the book, I have yet to read it as I have a lot of books to read. There are a lot of great books out there and I am excited about reading this one.
The walls are closing in and have backed creationism in a very tight corner, one bone at a time. One day, scientists will unearth the bones of creationists and study them as a recent, yet primitive form of humans. Hopefully that day will come, where that will be all that's left of their ignorance, a pile of fossilized BONES! Wouldn't that be ironic?!
Now we know it is merely a swimming fish. A false prediction. A great evolutionist fishing yarn.
Google:
Fossil Footprints Give Land Vertebrates a Much Longer History, sciencedaily
hume1947 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Footprints show tetrapods walked on land 18m years earlier than thought according to Fossil footprints found in southern poland lead to a radical rethink of the evolution of the first four-legged animals or 'tetrapods'
Until now, experts had believed that the earliest tetrapod fossils are 375 million years old
However, the footprint tracks are 10 million years older than the oldest elpistostegid body fossils. Suggesting they are NOT transitional forms.
Professor Per Ahlberg and Jenny Clack
MissionWorldPeace 2 years ago
But you don't have a "transitional form" of fish to mammal. Where is that??
StrawberryIce62769 2 years ago
@StrawberryIce62769 Yes we do, its an amphibious tetrapod named Tiktaalik, I am sure you have heard of it. ;)
BFKAnthony817 2 years ago
@StrawberryIce62769 Did you even watch the damm video?
aaronzvz 1 year ago
What a great video!
BigPapaSmurf25 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
every living thing is transitional
dfcvda 2 years ago
Interesting clip. Where is it from? Is there more?
Brianswers 3 years ago
I saw it on national geographic. Its about darwin and its evolution theory.and transitional fossils.And over how an disturbingly big group of people are very wrong.
paleophonus 3 years ago 3
Actually for every transitional fossil that we find they'll want to find one more before and one more after indeed continuing to move the goalposts.
garith21 3 years ago 8
this isin't fair =< we never win the game
Konkaver 3 years ago
naw, just because one side is in denial doesn't mean that the other side doesn't still win.
garith21 3 years ago 2
Actually all fossils are transitional when you think about it.
rotcafarg 3 years ago 3
yeah, it's arguable that every fossil or living being is a transition from what once was and what some day will be, but this is more in reference to "bridging" the gap between the taxonomic groups beyond species.
garith21 3 years ago 4
This story is one of those featured in the early chapters of Shubin's book "Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body"
It's not just stories about finding fossils, but really explores our connections with our ancestors. I'm enjoying it a lot. Readable but not patronising.
gibletparade 3 years ago 2
I have the book, I have yet to read it as I have a lot of books to read. There are a lot of great books out there and I am excited about reading this one.
s4stem 3 years ago
Well, the problem is that creationist keep moving the goal posts. Even though we have more fossils then they can explain away.
s4stem 3 years ago 2
The walls are closing in and have backed creationism in a very tight corner, one bone at a time. One day, scientists will unearth the bones of creationists and study them as a recent, yet primitive form of humans. Hopefully that day will come, where that will be all that's left of their ignorance, a pile of fossilized BONES! Wouldn't that be ironic?!
POSTMORTEM71 3 years ago 4
Creationists are already transitional fossils between primitive and modern Man.
jazzx251 3 years ago 16
@jazzx251 hehehehe true!
51m0n77 8 months ago