A pale skinned Red Haired Greek Girl, the same as the Redhaired frescos of the Ostruka mound and the Pellas Mosaic of a red haired Alexander the Great.So it looks as though modern day inhabitants of Greece are in fact Turkish.
YES, hitler did consider greeks and italians to be aryans because they are. You see, ancient aryans migrated into europe from central asia, settling in Greece and then moving into Italy and then into the Northern European areas. The common misconception is that aryans are blond haired and blue eyed... this is NORDIC, commonly confused with aryans who can have dark hair and dark eyes, as long as their facial structure is that of an Aryan. And plus hitler Adored Greek culture.
@Giygasdunelawl eh and how do you know that ti isn't the opposite way?that the Hellines mitigrates in Asia for example?The mythology of Hellas exists and agrees with this,that the Hellines travelled far inside Asia,about 4000-5000 BC.
The "olive skin" of medditerranian region is due to more recent mixtures with Moorish blood. Just a little bit of that into the population is going to change the skin color..
Anyone here ust go to Google Image search and type in "Ancient Greek color frescoes"
See all the darker complected Greeks, they did not have natural red hair. That's just BS passed down by lying Nordicists who've tried to claim ancient Greece for over 300 years now.
Only red hair they'd have is by dying it with henna, not naturally born with it.
You know it bothers me when someone writes that Greeks have olive skin because I'm 100 percent greek and I don't have olive skin complexion. Yes due to the proximity to the equator someone living in Greece is going to get a better tan than someone from Norway but it does mean that All Greeks have olive skin. I burn in the sun. alexander the great was noted as being fair like me. I have black hair hazel eyes and I am fair. Perfect candidate to be a goth
@nilssonharrison Greece had invasions of Germanic peoples after Rome fell, on top of the other Nordic peoples migrating afterward over hundreds of years. Burning in the sun is an obvious sign of you not being entirely indigenous to that sunny environment, or else you'd tan with ease if you or your entire ancestry was indigenous.
Sorry to say. :o
Nordics burn because they're not indigenous to southern Europe. You must be mixed with them heavily.
@Northax the fuck is all this shit about ''Nodics'' and all.only minor differences can be found within Europe and then only by looking at the frequency of occurence. Though i agree with you, why did they give her red hair?
@Northax Actually Eastern Roman empire fell in1453 and they held the borders furthermore you claim greeks became lighter due to nordics while others that became darker due to 400yrs turkish RECENT occupation That would affect the color more than sporadic nordic invasions Furthermore in 1920 1million greeks fled to mainland from the coast of asia minor("armenian"/greek genocide case)In a total of 10mil that would affect as well
@Northax I claim they rarely mixed but if u claim they did mix with nordics then they equally mixed with Turks more recently and to a greater degree Thus the ancients would be more white than todays greeksYour"burning in the sun"claim is invalid Amerindians were darker although they occupied lands from North to South.Even colder climates than medditerannean.Also one can burn at winter time as well if exposed to sun And Nordics tan just fine its just the first days one can burn till skin adapts
Ok guys, let's not get into a big argument over what race most of the ancient greeks were. These are well trained scientists and I'm sure they could tell by the skull that this particular girl was caucasian. They weren't trying to offend anyone.
@evillttlimp People add their biased views on things many times, including "scientists" who many people ignorantly trust without question. They "reconstructed" the face of one of the crystal skulls found in central American and the "scientist" (lol) said it was a Caucasian face because of the nasal ridge seen on the skull, but what the ignoramus did not know is that many Native Americans (Mayans) had ridged noses as well, just by looking at their ancient art you will see it.
@evillttlimp So them attempting to reconstruct a Greek girls color is pathetic and only goes on bias which was born out of being told this is how they looked, instead of looking at actual ancient Greek art and seeing they had dark curly hair and dark eyes en masse, but that would be too much for them because then they'd assume it looks too "non-white" for their liking, so they go the "Nordic" route saying they had red hair, but some Greeks dyed their hair red, not natural.
@Northax Some had natural red or blonde hair, because these colors are not only found all over Europe, but all over the world for thousands of years. Now that doesn't mean that lighter hair was common (although it was at the establishment of ancient Greece, Rome etc. before having gradual non-European migrations) but nonetheless it was still there.
Hey, hey. You know that Greece was half African right? It was the white men who seduced the black Greeks into homosexuality as the white man cannot get enough of dicks and doo-doo! Greece was a bi-racial society and that is why today they Greeks look like a fused type of African and white. Of course remixing keeps the hair straighter, but the hiar is largely black and skin is pretty dark. Not because of the sun either. The white man is from Asia, not Europe.
@ReturnoftheBrotha No, Greece was not bi-racial, you propagandist. Some Africans might have come to Greece for trade during ancient times, but that's about it. A vast majority of Greek art shows Caucasoid type peoples as Greek. Stop trying to claim Greek history, your insecurity makes you look pathetic.
@Northax: You just said that it was bi-racial fool! You wrote that "caucaSOID TYPE peoples" were shown as Greek. You admit it but want to go around it.
HOWEVER!!! It is possible that Baltic people like Prussians with light blue eyes, are mixed with persians, and that's why they sometimes have black hair.
But that's about the only possible feature they had from persians.
So it's not impossible they have black hair, from white persians ....
But persians are the only white race I know, with dominant black hair features. Coincidentally we live near the "Black Sea"
Yaaay!!! How sad for you, to lose all lies here. To be defeated now, shamefully
@Northax When the main battle began, the Persian army faced fundamental problems. While heavy cavalry had proved efficient against Roman armies, it was too slow and regimented to act with full force against the agile and unpredictable lightly-armed Arab cavalry and foot archers.
The Persian army did meet with a few initial successes. War-elephants temporarily stopped the Arab army, but when Arab veterans returned from the Syrian fronts where they had been fighting
@Northax against Byzantine armies, they taught the Arab army how to deal with these beasts. Thus, war-elephants lost their effectiveness.
These factors contributed to the decisive Sassanid defeat at the Battle of al-Qādisiyyah. The Persians, who had only the generation before conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, lost decisive battles when nimble, lightly-armed Arabs accustomed to skirmishes and desert warfare attacked them.
Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
See, they looked pretty much just like GREEKS in the GREEK ceramic art! They were closely related, you simpleton. LOL! :-)
You admit Greeks had golden (good) skin, and were dark in complexion, and guess what, so were the Persians shown in Greek ceramic vase are! You lose really bad here.
Again: Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
@Northax The Islamic conquest of Persia (633–656) led to the end of the Sasssanid and the eventual decline of the Zoroastrian religion in Persia. However, the achievements of the previous Persian civilizations were not lost, but were to a great extent absorbed by the new Islamic polity.
No, the Greeks have giant fat noses. Like jews do, almost like a beast's snout.
Persians had very thin and small noses, with tiny nostrils. Extremely contrasting.
So not only heavy clothes, small noses normal for white people, titles like Rex, battles against Turks, Arabs, Romans and Greeks.
But even the Xenophon greek author calls the Persians \"White|" in greek writing no less. They admit persians are as white as the europeans.
That's why Aristotle considered both europeans and persians as "white weaklings". Because they were just as white and unprotected against sunstroke and heat and sunlight.
@Soveraine The skin color could not be made on that kind of art, since there was only two color shades: black and very light color of background. They could not make tan-like colors with it, you moron, so even if someone was olive skin light tan colored, they could not make it look that way in those ceramic pot art pieces.
Actual ancient Persian wall art shows a PERSIAN SOLDIER with brownish type skin tone, but you deny that with more twist/spin BS so typical of your INSECURE kind. lol! :-)
@Northax Yes, but that is not the reason Persians are white.
It's because the only ones knows as Persians, were seen as "evil" and "wicked", by Arab and Greek Racists, who only thought their own gold skin is "superior" to pale skin.
Just like you do now. You confirm those savages were Racist against whites, and Jealous of the Persian Reich. Which was even led by "Pers Rex", which is obviously a Gothic title.
@Northax That shows an Arab. Again. The brown skin, belong to the Hindus and Arab or even Turks, who invaded from the Orient.
The ones showing persians are not coloured. Even the skeleton and skull of that persian soldier they unburied, has normal, thin nose unlike the iranian or arab with fat large noses.
And a soft, smooth forehead, typical for white people of higher intellect.
That persian soldier doesn't have a subhuman skull like you do.
The persian skeleton found under caved walls, with other roman soldiers? At a battle between persians and romans? Well did you?
That skull of a persian soldier, looks nothing like your ugly semitic skulls. Find one trait on that persian's skull that you think looks like anything you semites or other desert rats have.
Well? Do so. Find your evidence that persians were not white, but semitic, on that actual persian skull.
Greeks did not need protection from the sun, since they don't burn like pale vampires in the sun like your thin-skinned people burn to red crisp. Greeks do not live in the desert, so they do not need protection from blowing sand like Middle Easterners do, you dimwit. lol! Greeks had plate armor to wear, as well. Much of it too heavy to run far in, especially in the heat, so keeping it light was the key, you simpleton dimwit. lol!
@Northax The persians had better conditions and luxuries than any greek.
They had chariots, veils, cloths, decorated shelters. Many things that make them less in harm's way from desert anything.
Do you know why? Because as white people, the persians needed those "luxuries". Their living style did not require them to wear protection from desert, because they lived a lot better than greek naked savages, who occasionally wore skirts .....
@Soveraine Ancient Greek frescoes show GREEKS with chariots from 1300 B.C. and before then, as well, and clothes, advanced decorated shelters, among many other luxuries. WOW you're so ignorant!
Persians were not "white" like Germanics are white. Persians were Semitic Middle Eastern type peoples of similar blood to ancient Greeks, Israelites, and other peoples of west Asia.
Your jealousy of Persian history and attempt to claim it as yours makes you look needy and pathetic, like Africentrics.
Greeks are mercenaries and thieves. You stole things from Europeans and Persians, then pretended like it's yours.
Disgusting. You know you don't belong in Europe right?
Europe is only for whites. And Middle east? Only for white Persians.
Arabs turks greeks romans, are all mudskins who belong in the swamps. Drowned in the dirty rivers of Tigrus and Eufrates, that have the same mud as your skin in color.
@Northax Iranians are semitic middle eastern people of similar blood to greeks jews and west asians.
Persians are white. That's the end of it.
The reason you call it Iran instead of Persia, is because the white persians are ONLY A MINORITY.
Persians are just a minority in Iran now. But more numerous around the Black Sea, which was several times overwhelmed by Persian armies from both sides, when fighting the Scythians or Macedonians.
This explains why we're here in Europe. We stayed here !!!
Oink and Squeel all you like, Piglet. You cannot even prove your lies, using the persian skeleton found near the roman skeletons, that I showed you how to find.
Why? Because that persian doesn't have subhuman semitic or turanid features in the skull. Simple as such.
Wiggle all you like, in the mud, Piggy. Everyone with mind who researches this, now looks at you as a slave and subhuman who tried to steal white history, .... but failed and is now humiliate
@Northax You managed to scream your way out of being defeated by "Germanics", I suppose, no? By seeing the past comments here, before I proved your stupidity.
But there's no way you could win against me, a true persian. Since White Persians defeated the Greeks, and even used you cowards as our slaves and mercenaries.
It's quite possible that white persians were in Greece much longer than you semitic sandy faces Africans that pretend to be greeks.
@Northax So according to normal European history, that is likely censored in propaganda fueled dictatorships like yours or Greece's, white people were here before the :"greeks".
The Helleni or Acheans were blue eyed blondes from Gaul, northern parts of Europe. Yes!!!
And the Pelasgi or Persians, were black haired.
And both are here before you semites crawled out of the sandy african dunes, running from nigger bedouin rapists. Who taught you homosexuality, I'm sure.
@Northax: Persians were not Semites and unlike today, you could clearly tell a Persian from a Greek (which one, black or white?) and those two from Israelites and most certainly "others peoples from west Asia." You must not confuse the totally mixed up peoples of today from the mixed up peoples from yesteryear. Yes, Greeks did start off black and dealt only with Asia and Africa - not Europe. The traits of whites follow them - homosexuality, killing and tricks.
@ReturnoftheBrotha Haha! Don't you wish, you silly Afrocentric "Brotha"? LOL! Sorry, but your Afro-propaganda "history" isn't working here, either. You also show your insecurity, just like this Austrian idiot trying to claim Persians looked like white people with pale white skin. Not going to happen here. You should go look up West African history and be happy with that, not claim someone elses history, it just makes you look needy and pathetic, like any Nordicist moron trying to claim Egypt.
You're primarily wrong based on your biased propaganda. Bottom line, you're a racist (hater of whites) and I dealt with manipulators like you! Rejecting about ever supported, evidence and documented text book in the world, based on subject maters, such as this one, ONLY to support and subjugate the idea everything in the world was founded, discovered, and, or created by tribal Negroid Africans groups (Sub-Saharan).
@jahellaspartan: Those are your words not mine... YOU wrote "sub-Saharan" while I do not use those terms because I am dealing with the Saharan black man as seen in Libya and Darfur. The historical record (not the white man's conclusions) are more than clear. The white man is from Asia which is why he calls himself a caucASIAN and not European! The record is also clear that the black man was in every land on earth prior to others. The white man can claim homosexulaity as his...
@ReturnoftheBrotha The term "Caucasian" had nothing to do with the people being from Asia....it had to do with being from the Caucasus, which is just north of Georgia, and NOT in Asia, but South-Eastern Europe. The "White man" descended from Africans, and developed an extremely pale skin tone from being in the forested, mountainous, extremely cold areas of the area described above.
@Northax Again, the Phrygian cap is worn commonly by "Ciobans" in Europe. They're shepherds, who gained their name from "Shah Ban" of Persia.
That cap is kept by the persians when they became shepherds in Europe. Most shepherds still have that cap as traditional, original wear, and the name "cioban" from "shah ban", the persian.
Again, giant fat greek ears of a semite. Small thin ears of a white persian.
Sorry, but your ancestors were not the Persians, lol! Before A.D. times, your ancestors lived in Northern Europe solely and lived primitively compared to Rome, Greece or Persia. This is why there's no seriously big history of huge structures in northern Europe like there is a HUGE history known WORLDWIDE of Persians, Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, etc. ALL seen today, and they were ALL built in B.C. times, before Germanic/Nordic invasions stole/trashed many things.
Only europeans with black hair and pale skin, are originally Persians. And not europeans, or that related to other white races.
Mingrelians, and other people in Bulgaria, or near the Danube, even Balkans, basically around the Black Sea, which is upper side of the Persian Reich, now has these women mostly, of Persian ancestry.
And they are nothing like the swarthy skinned people in their regions. They are pale, and with the darkest hair.
@Northax And why would germanic people mix with the Arab or Turkish invaders of the Persian empire, to have children which now you claim only have black hair because of Asian invaders who were only enemies of the Persians?
This truly makes no sense, but still you have to provide cases of which Germanic people with light hair, admit to have accepted non-white savages with black hair as their family.
Unless you find this, how can you prove those are not the PErsians, despite looking alike?
@Soveraine You've been seriously brainwashed to believe Persians were "white" like you? LMAO! Such a simpleton dolt you are. You only believe this crap because it puffs your pride up to make you feel better about yourself (since you must be a loser IRL). Typical Nazi loser, always trying to steal someone elses history and claim it as their own! Wow! Such losers! :-)
@Northax And what makes you, the Idiot, believe that black hair is unique to Iranians or Hindus ?
What makes you think White Races are unable to have black hair? Well? What's your evidence that says the black hair pigment cannot be found in the genes of fair people?
The yellow skin pigment, or caroten that you greeks and other enemies of the White Persians, have, does not create black hair.
Caroten is the pigment only for yellow skin. One can still have black hair, without caroten pigment.
@Northax Or, you are jealous that the Europeans were right about something.
And Persians were a great White Empire, than your little greedy greek piglets, or the savage arab or turks that later hoarded up with their light armour, since they did not require heavy armor and skin protection, like the persians always had .....
Humiliated much, subhuman? Are you afraid the Whites were right, after all?
The persian wears thick skin clothes, like stockings almost. Which is normal for Europeans to wear.
Many tradition european outfits of white people, have that ankle low leggings that cover their legs. This is to protect their pale skin from damage or sand or dust or burns, and so on.
This is why white people are civilised. This is why the persians were white, and considered more civilised than their non-white neighbours (romans, arabs, greeks and turks).
@Soveraine Your Germanic / Nordic pale white ancestors with blond/red hair had NOTHING to do with ancient Persia. LOL! Art and historical facts prove me RIGHT! You just have no ancient civilized history as Nordics up in northern Europe, so you're desperate to try and claim other peoples' advanced civilized history, like the DARK Semitic Persians of ancient time! YOU are no different than desperate Afrocentric liars attempting to do the same. So what do you think about that?
@Northax Persians are pale as well. Look at Mingrelians in east Black Sea, or persian women in Bulgaria (about 30-40% in the country side I saw them).
Palest of skins in the country, and blackest of hair. That's what persians were like in "persian art", especially of the women, who look the same as the ancient persian girls.
@Soveraine No, dumbass. Those women are likely a mixture of Germanic / Nordic genes (thus the pale white skin) and Asiatic or Mediterranean genes (thus black hair, or brown eyes, etc.).
So much mixture with Germanics has happened over the last 1500 years, you cannot say who is who compared to looking at the ancient from Persia.
Persians are Middle Eastern with olive skin tone, black hair, brown eyes, pretty much just like indigenous southern Europeans (close cousins).
And behold the same pale skin, black hair, and pink lips.
Contrasting deeply, with the dark skins of Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Turks. All of whom were bitter enemies (as in to the death enemies) as in Mortal Enemies, to those white Persians.
Yes, persians were white. Now wallow in your self loathe, for knowing Greece fell before Persia ever did, with greeks as traitors and power hungry piglets.
While persians retreated to europe, north of persia.
@Northax Then why don't these pale persians with black hair, have any germanic features?
Why no flat noses, with giant nostrils? Why no elephant ears? Why no yellow caroten pigment as dominant?
Why the pale skin than germanic skin, and why the hair darker than yours, and without the Asian/ Turks blue shimmer than only their spiky straight asian hair has?
Why the silky soft black hair, with white shine instead? Why no oils in that hair, like you asians have? Hm?
The White Persians were racist against the jews, until the Whore of Babylon tricked the persians into accepting the non-white jews into Persia.
This lead to the weakening of the White Persian Reich.
The Persian Zoroastrianism or Mazdayanism, proves they saw white people as "Good", because of their pale skin. And PErsians being white themselves, they logically had that religion of Dualism.
@Northax Just because you don't know about civilizations in Europe, before you subhumans crawled along like sea gypsies, doesn't mean they didn't existed.
They were strong enough to defeat you faggots, so they obviously had civilization and culture. The Vinland / Finland realm is acknowledged by the latino arabs of Rome.
They even say that Vinland spread from Finland (Scandinavia) to the New World (Canada).
@Northax The dark semitic Arabs of that time, wearing Arabic clothes like the Muslims, and yellow knots on their fat heads, and blue dye hair, are Arabs.
The Persians didn't die their hair blue. Arabs did. And arabs also wore yellow knots tiaras on their heads.
So you confuse the white persians who fled Persia into Black Sea and Europe, with semitic Arabs who looked exactly like those dark skinned blue haired monkeys.
@Northax Iranians have giant ears. They look more like the greeks in those vases or murals. Big ears are a sign of subhumans with desert adaptations, and coloured skin.
White skin has small ears, and thin nose, with very tiny nostrils. Persians have this in real life, in Europe, as well as in ancient murals of persians.
Now do you understand why the need for heavy armor and clothing? White persians in Europe have the same skin burn problem and sunstroke, so we used the heavy persian armor.
Does this mean the greek is also white? Of course not.
It just means they payed attention to anything other than skin colour. Because greeks felt already inferior because they had skin of Arabs or Turks or Jews.
They were Semitic Middle Eastern people, no matter HOW you try and twist it. They had black hair, yep, just like Middle Easterners have black hair. They did NOT have blonde hair! The Nordicist idiots try to claim they had blonde hair, yet again insecurely trying to claim someone ELSES ancient advanced history, because Germanics know their ACTUAL history is PRIMITIVE in northern Europe. They hate reading the words of ROMANS claiming Germanics as PRIMITIVE, DIRTY, UNCIVILIZED, etc. lol! Awww! :-)
@Soveraine German mustache? LOL! No such thing, you simpleton. Anyone with heavy facial hair (like Middle Eastern peoples of Semitic blood) can easily have such mustaches, YOU DOLT! LMAO! WOW!
Go to Google Image search and type in: Persian soldier art
DO IT! I dare you! Now look at the pictures of Persian soldiers with curly black beards, light brown skin tone. MIDDLE EASTERN SEMITIC PERSIANS!
@Soveraine The Greeks in their own ceramic vase art show Persians to be just like them in looks, and you admit Greeks were gold skin peoples, lolol! You just got owned. Bye now, for good this time. You lose. lol ! :-)
@Northax Almost 2,000 years ago, 19 Roman soldiers rushed into a cramped underground tunnel, prepared to defend the Roman-held Syrian city of Dura-Europos from an army of Persians digging to undermine the city's mudbrick walls. But instead of Persian soldiers, the Romans met with a wall of noxious black smoke that turned to acid in their lungs. Their crystal-pommeled swords were no match for this weapon;
@Northax the Romans choked and died in moments, many with their last pay of coins still slung in purses on their belts.
Nearby, a Persian soldier — perhaps the one who started the toxic underground fire — suffered his own death throes, grasping desperately at his chain mail shirt as he choked.
@Northax Germanics are not and were never "primitive". Germany is the most advanced nation in Europe today and their Scandinavian cousins are also very advanced. There is absolutely no basis for your statement...nothing.
@ancestoralmemory sorry historically (meaning the ancient past), Germanics as well as Slavics were not as advanced as Southern Europeans or Mediterraneans.
@SandraLondon63 weren't they called barbarians... so why the ego when it comes to this subrace, just because some look more attractive aesthetically, doesn't mean they are a 'better' or more supreme race at all... intelligence and innovation is more important to making a civilisation 'great'.... which i believe the Mediterraneans were, there's no comparison. From an Alpinid lol
@SpiritusPatriae Maybe you're not, but some Nazi idiot Nordicists try to say Greeks had blonde hair and blue eyes, as if they're Germanic, which they weren't. They do this because they're envious of ancient Greek advanced civilization, of which their actual ancestors had no part in. They have this "genetic superiority complex" they must keep puffed up with lies and falsehoods. This includes an attempt to show "Germanic continuity" throughout ancient advanced civilizations. They're pathetic.
The Romans did hold Germanic people as slaves, maybe not most, but they did hold some. I never said they held all of them, but it's recorded in history, that the Romans used to cut the light hair off of Germanic slaves and wear the hair as wigs.
That reconstruction should have black curly hair, not red-light brown. Some Greeks did dye their hair red colors back then using henna, but a girl so young, would not do that.
Look up Ancient Greek frescoes on Google Image search, you'll see black curly hair on ancient Greeks from around 5th century B.C.
The light colors were very rare, and only was around because of dying hair light with henna and other materials.
These Germanic Nazis want to claim Greece, but it's not theirs! lol
@Northax Greece is full of subhuman arabs and turks. You are Egyptians who belong in Africa.
No one cares about Greece.
Originally it belonged to White Macedonians (dominantly with red hair like the Scythians).
Again, the Acheans in Greece, were blue eyed and blonde, but not because they were Greek. Because they were white europeans from the north, possibly Gaul.
They were never Germanic or any of that Nazi legend.
@Soveraine LOL! You're another lying sack of shit Germanic idiot. No, original Greeks did not have red hair. Again, ancient Greek color frescoes show BLACK hair, brown eyed people, you lying idiot. lol! Greeks did not have blonde hair or blue eyes, you liar. Stop spreading more lies, you jealous moron. lol!
The only reason the Germanic tribes (yes, all of them are Germanic, stop lies) successfully invaded Rome was because the Western part was temp. in decline.
I never said original greeks ever had red hair, You utterly useless cow.
Scythians and Macedonians had red hair. They conquered you, the gold skinned, subhuman greek savages from Africa and Crete.
I never said Greeks had blonde hair or blue eyes, you filthy lying twat pie. I said the Acheans who invaded Greece from the north (White Europe), were Gauls. And they had blue eyes or blonde hair.
Those are not Germanic tribes, you pathetic faggot.
@Northax Sure, but black hair or brown eyes, don't decide the race.
They could have been romans as well. With giant fat ears, and black curly hair, and brown eyes.
They have those you know. They're not White, just subhuman semites from Africa.
Yes I am aware of those frescas, subhuman. Unlike you, who ignores that those were not really white Europeans. Only african pieces of trash, with golden skin.
Greeks were racist against Whites, how could you idiots ever be "civilised"? You're Animaloid
@Northax Again, Hereminius or Arminius was Gallic. Blue eyed blonde is how Gauls looked like, north of the roman impire.
You're just latinos. Subhuman nobodies from Africa. Islam would have been your fate, except you invaded europe before that, so you avoided becoming suicide bombers.
Greeks have Oriental Accents. And a piece of trash vomit you call a language.
Curly hair and brown eyes, like frescas of ancient greeks, are SEMITIC AFRICANS. Not Whites, not Europeans.
@Northax Jealous of what? You ignorants were easily defeated and enslaved both by persians who used greeks as mercenaries, and by macedonians who were white europeans, that became your masters.
And also used you as cannon-fodder so to speak. Greeks were only pedophiles and weaklings. Not even white, so of course you were enslaved in Europe, before the christian era Even Began!!!
@Northax What are the "lies" I would be spreading, again?
Acheans were from north, inland Europe. Possibly Gauls. Who were a pre-germanic tribe of France. A gallic people that spoke gallic, which was kept in some french words and other gaulo-celtic or romanche dialects north of the roman borders.
They were nothing not in the least "Germanic". They were Gauls. That's it. Arminius was a Gaul. The Germanic name is just a misunderstanding, and you throw it around like an ignorant cow.
@Northax The Eastern part payed Tribute, to white people north of the Danube, because they feared the Slavs, Goths, and other white people of Europe.
The West refused to pay tribute to Europeans, so you were demolished, and we took our tribute straight from Rome.
The West fell because your entire so called civilization was imaginary and just a myth. You were subhuman wogs, who fell to superior white armies of Europe, very easily. We even had territory advantage.
@Northax Again, you disgusting pig vomit. They were not Germanic tribes. Arminius of the Gaulic "Creusci" tribe, was actually Allied to Rome and the romans.
They fought by your side, against "germanic" tribes, or other enemies of Rome.
The only time they defeated Rome, and became as you say "germanic" was when the Gauls (not Germanic either), rallied by Arminius / Hermann, defeated the Romans of the West.
This is where you utter stupidity loses focus of History and slurs into madness.
@Northax The West was not in decline. IT was always pathetic and worthless.
The East survived because they payed tribute to the white people of Europe, north of their borders.
They payed tribute to the Goths, and when Philip the Arab imperator of Rome, refused to pay that tribute (romans get greedy and keep the tribute for your gay orgies), you were defeated at Abrittus.
Where not only the next roman imperator and son were killed, but general surrendered, and resumed payment of tribute.Slave.
@Soveraine Germani tribes were given permission to live just north of Rome because they came down since the invasions of Mongol tribes forced them to, but some Germanic tribes knew they wanted to invade Rome and steal ADVANCED technology the Germanic tribes did not make themselves. You can label them all different things, Gauls, whatever, they were all mainly of similar blood who had pale white skin, blue/green eyes, red or blonde hair - Germanic. Stop your spin, propagandist. lol!
@Soveraine When I say Germanic, I mean ALL people indigenous to northern Europe, you stupid dimwit. Haven't caught on yet? Too slow in the head? lol! :-)
Arian? No, dimwit. Aryans are originally from Iran, aka Persians. You stupid Nazi dolt Germanics tried to steal the label "Aryan" to claim as your own. Your simpleton Nazi Germanic ancestors in WWII also tried to steal the symbol of swastika and claimed it as their own, when it was NOT theirs. That's ancient symbol from India, and elsewhere.
@Soveraine LMAO! What history books do you read? Ones written by Nazi Nordicists, obviously. You're quite brainwashed. lol! Majority of Etruscan color frescoes show brown skinned, curly black haired people in them, actually. Go do another Google Image search on that, silly Nordicist. lolol! Blondes were CLEAR minority in Etruscan art, thus obviously hinting at BLONDES being from a FOREIGN (northern) source of people, not the actual indigenous Etruscans with DARK complexions. LOL! You lack logic.
From Babylon, the idea of human rights spread quickly to India, Greece and eventually Rome. There the concept of “natural law” arose, in observation of the fact that people tended to follow certain unwritten laws in the course of life, and Roman law was based on rational ideas derived from the nature of things.
@Soveraine Persia WAS NOT WHITE, you simpleton dolt. LMAO! You're so ignorant, it's amazing. But that's the mental disease known as Nordicist Nazism. lol! Persians were Middle Eastern Semitic peoples, you're jealous of their history because YOUR ancestors had nothing to do with Persians.
Greeks and Romans are closely related to Middle Eastern Persians and Semitics, and you hate hearing that, because it destroys your pride which was built up on falsehoods. lol!
@Northax Years of warfare between Sassanids and Byzantines, as well as the strain of the Khazar invasion of Transcaucasia (Third Perso-Turkic War, exhausted both armies. With no effective ruler following Khosrau II, societal chaos, and problems in provincial administration (until Yazdegerd III, the Persian army lost potency. Yazdegerd III lacked experience and didn't try to rebuild the army.
@Northax When Arab squadrons made their first raids into Sassanid territory, Yazdegerd III didn't consider them a threat, and he refused to send an army to encounter the invaders. When the main Arab army reached the Persian borders, Yazdegerd III procrastinated in dispatching an army against the Arabs. Even Rostam-e Farokhzad, who was both Eran Spahbod and Viceroy, didn't see the Arabs as a threat. Without opposition, the Arabs had time to consolidate and fortify their positions.
@Northax The persians themselves were overran by Turks from the Caucassus, as well as Arab invaders.
The same ones who call themselves Iranian now.
How could the persians be invaded by someone who was their own people? Impossible now.
The turks and arabs were enemies who destroyed the Persian Empire.
Just like romans and greeks were bitter enemies of the Persians. So the White Persians held back your dirty roman / greek / arabian / turkish bastards for a lot. Considering 4 to 1 odds, haha.
Documents asserting individual rights, such as the Magna Carta (1215), the Petition of Right (1628), the US Constitution (1787), the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789), and the US Bill of Rights (1791) are the written precursors to many of today’s human rights documents.
See? The white persians are the Source of inspiration for the subhuman trash of greece and romans.
@Northax They likely started their excavations 130 feet (40 meters) away from the city, in a tomb in Dura's underground necropolis. Meanwhile, the Roman defenders dug their own countermines in hopes of intercepting the tunneling Persians.
@Northax If you're reffering to those Gypsies with yellow knots on their Blue Hair, with Blue Beards, I hope you realise that Persians didn't really have blue beards and blue hair.
Are you an idiot or something? They're niggers who wear islam robes, and have a yellow bandana made of knots on their heads.
If you think those are persians, you are truly as idiotic as most greek subhumans are.
@Soveraine Denial, denial. You typed in Persian soldier art and found that, but the truth hurts so much! Middle Eastern Semites can have curly hair, and brown skin, without being black African, you ignorant dolt. You didn't even know that! LMAO! Such a moron! You lost the debate, now you get desperate! LMAO! Poor Nazi idiot, what a loser you are. That's actual PERSIAN ART, idiot! They know what they looked like! LOL!
Greeks show Persians in their own Greek art look similar to Greeks, lol! DARK
@Soveraine By the way, Persians had blue hair dye back then, as well, so it was most likely dyed hair, thus why it's blue. Again, try reading up on hair dye used by the ancients. You simpleton ignoramus. :-)
Truth hurts you, I can see it. lol! GREEK ARt shows Persians as dark and swarthy, just like Greeks back then. Did you see the ceramic art I told you to look up?
Truth hurts when you LIVE a lie, like you do daily. lol! :-)
@Soveraine Christians? Hahaha! Christianity is a MIDDLE EASTERN Semitic religion, genius! Didn't know that, either? WOW, you're clueless!
You're seriously in denial. You're a waste of time to even talk to anymore. People reading these posts will laugh at you. They can look up everything I speak about and see it's logically true. Persia - Middle East - Middle Easterners. Romans/Greeks in south had dark complexion, thus adapted to sunny environment, etc. Ancient art proves their look, as well.
@Soveraine Bye now, simpleton, descendent of primitive tribal Germanic barbarians who had no advanced civilization until they came in contact with DARK AND SWARTHY southern European Romans and Greeks in around 300-500 A.D. LOL!
You hate learning REAL history of your (very) primitive ancestors, huh? You were just as primitive as Negroids in sub-Sahara Africa back then, and that stabs your "pride" (built on falsehoods) right in the heart. lol! I can sense it! LOL! History embarrasses you pales.
A pale skinned Red Haired Greek Girl, the same as the Redhaired frescos of the Ostruka mound and the Pellas Mosaic of a red haired Alexander the Great.So it looks as though modern day inhabitants of Greece are in fact Turkish.
BrianFoley64 3 days ago
Greeks are Nordic people, always have. right now, many have mixed with fuckin turks. But ancient Greeks are Nordic people
TheDisharmony 1 week ago
@TheDisharmony Fuck you Ancient Greeks were never and are not Nordics you retarded ape!!
stutterfly21 1 week ago
YES, hitler did consider greeks and italians to be aryans because they are. You see, ancient aryans migrated into europe from central asia, settling in Greece and then moving into Italy and then into the Northern European areas. The common misconception is that aryans are blond haired and blue eyed... this is NORDIC, commonly confused with aryans who can have dark hair and dark eyes, as long as their facial structure is that of an Aryan. And plus hitler Adored Greek culture.
Giygasdunelawl 2 weeks ago 4
@Giygasdunelawl eh and how do you know that ti isn't the opposite way?that the Hellines mitigrates in Asia for example?The mythology of Hellas exists and agrees with this,that the Hellines travelled far inside Asia,about 4000-5000 BC.
GrandInquisitorOfGR 1 week ago
this is retarded.... you cant reconstruct a face based on a skull.
hearv888 2 weeks ago
@hearv888 - Yes you can.
oterrivelivan 1 week ago
@oterrivelivan It wont be accurate...
hearv888 1 week ago
not nordic type
DariusLeGrand100 2 weeks ago
ill say only one thing VERY VERY UGLY.yak
delagrazia 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is really scary!
mbphelabed 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
mbphelabed 3 weeks ago
that lousy english accent and she has a mustache!
atfatw 3 weeks ago
I must say... Metris Was One Pretty Girl
1xelmox1 1 month ago
Very interesting. I like seeing reconstructed faces of people from the past. We can see a lot of ourselves in our ancestors.
HistoryLover1550 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What the hell is all this chaos and pandemonium going on with the comments?!
TheEternity425 1 month ago
she was a ginger
TheSaintEmma 1 month ago
The "olive skin" of medditerranian region is due to more recent mixtures with Moorish blood. Just a little bit of that into the population is going to change the skin color..
LambadLambadLambda 2 months ago
Or type "Ancient Greek frescoes"
Northax 2 months ago
Anyone here ust go to Google Image search and type in "Ancient Greek color frescoes"
See all the darker complected Greeks, they did not have natural red hair. That's just BS passed down by lying Nordicists who've tried to claim ancient Greece for over 300 years now.
Only red hair they'd have is by dying it with henna, not naturally born with it.
Northax 2 months ago
You know it bothers me when someone writes that Greeks have olive skin because I'm 100 percent greek and I don't have olive skin complexion. Yes due to the proximity to the equator someone living in Greece is going to get a better tan than someone from Norway but it does mean that All Greeks have olive skin. I burn in the sun. alexander the great was noted as being fair like me. I have black hair hazel eyes and I am fair. Perfect candidate to be a goth
nilssonharrison 2 months ago
@nilssonharrison Greece had invasions of Germanic peoples after Rome fell, on top of the other Nordic peoples migrating afterward over hundreds of years. Burning in the sun is an obvious sign of you not being entirely indigenous to that sunny environment, or else you'd tan with ease if you or your entire ancestry was indigenous.
Sorry to say. :o
Nordics burn because they're not indigenous to southern Europe. You must be mixed with them heavily.
Northax 2 months ago
@Northax the fuck is all this shit about ''Nodics'' and all.only minor differences can be found within Europe and then only by looking at the frequency of occurence. Though i agree with you, why did they give her red hair?
jaskamakkara 1 month ago
@Northax Actually Eastern Roman empire fell in1453 and they held the borders furthermore you claim greeks became lighter due to nordics while others that became darker due to 400yrs turkish RECENT occupation That would affect the color more than sporadic nordic invasions Furthermore in 1920 1million greeks fled to mainland from the coast of asia minor("armenian"/greek genocide case)In a total of 10mil that would affect as well
delagrazia 2 weeks ago
@Northax I claim they rarely mixed but if u claim they did mix with nordics then they equally mixed with Turks more recently and to a greater degree Thus the ancients would be more white than todays greeksYour"burning in the sun"claim is invalid Amerindians were darker although they occupied lands from North to South.Even colder climates than medditerannean.Also one can burn at winter time as well if exposed to sun And Nordics tan just fine its just the first days one can burn till skin adapts
delagrazia 2 weeks ago
...TELL US ATHENIANS LOOKED LIKE THAT SHIT
TRANFUCKER 2 months ago
WHAT A FUCKING HOAX THEY CHOSED THAT FUCKING UGLY NON-ATHENIAN SKULL TO
TRANFUCKER 2 months ago
Ok guys, let's not get into a big argument over what race most of the ancient greeks were. These are well trained scientists and I'm sure they could tell by the skull that this particular girl was caucasian. They weren't trying to offend anyone.
evillttlimp 2 months ago
@evillttlimp People add their biased views on things many times, including "scientists" who many people ignorantly trust without question. They "reconstructed" the face of one of the crystal skulls found in central American and the "scientist" (lol) said it was a Caucasian face because of the nasal ridge seen on the skull, but what the ignoramus did not know is that many Native Americans (Mayans) had ridged noses as well, just by looking at their ancient art you will see it.
Northax 2 months ago
@evillttlimp So them attempting to reconstruct a Greek girls color is pathetic and only goes on bias which was born out of being told this is how they looked, instead of looking at actual ancient Greek art and seeing they had dark curly hair and dark eyes en masse, but that would be too much for them because then they'd assume it looks too "non-white" for their liking, so they go the "Nordic" route saying they had red hair, but some Greeks dyed their hair red, not natural.
Northax 2 months ago
@Northax Some had natural red or blonde hair, because these colors are not only found all over Europe, but all over the world for thousands of years. Now that doesn't mean that lighter hair was common (although it was at the establishment of ancient Greece, Rome etc. before having gradual non-European migrations) but nonetheless it was still there.
ancestoralmemory 1 month ago
Only the northern part of the Mediterranian is civilised because Africa sucks and has always been crap.
GodOfUnbelief 2 months ago
It's ironic that we all developed superiority complexes exactly the same. Oh wait.
JimiJons 2 months ago
why did they gave her a red hair!!
ysr144 2 months ago
Comment removed
ysr144 2 months ago
That is truly amazing and educational!!!
BluesHarp60 3 months ago
she had some fucked up teeth....
ta6yLMAO 3 months ago
Hey, hey. You know that Greece was half African right? It was the white men who seduced the black Greeks into homosexuality as the white man cannot get enough of dicks and doo-doo! Greece was a bi-racial society and that is why today they Greeks look like a fused type of African and white. Of course remixing keeps the hair straighter, but the hiar is largely black and skin is pretty dark. Not because of the sun either. The white man is from Asia, not Europe.
ReturnoftheBrotha 3 months ago
@ReturnoftheBrotha No, Greece was not bi-racial, you propagandist. Some Africans might have come to Greece for trade during ancient times, but that's about it. A vast majority of Greek art shows Caucasoid type peoples as Greek. Stop trying to claim Greek history, your insecurity makes you look pathetic.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax: You just said that it was bi-racial fool! You wrote that "caucaSOID TYPE peoples" were shown as Greek. You admit it but want to go around it.
ReturnoftheBrotha 3 months ago
@Northax Ignore that bollock, he is a uneducated troll.
Greeks back then looked like Greeks today. Brown hair, brown eyes, mediteranian skin colour.
VictumRoManius 3 months ago
Leonidas, is distinctly Mediterranean, is described as "a man with black hair, black beard and brown eyes, and hero brave face" by Herodotus.
NetonIberoyBrutal 3 months ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
HOWEVER!!! It is possible that Baltic people like Prussians with light blue eyes, are mixed with persians, and that's why they sometimes have black hair.
But that's about the only possible feature they had from persians.
So it's not impossible they have black hair, from white persians ....
But persians are the only white race I know, with dominant black hair features. Coincidentally we live near the "Black Sea"
Yaaay!!! How sad for you, to lose all lies here. To be defeated now, shamefully
Soveraine 3 months ago
Bye now, work calls me! Loser! LOL! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax When the main battle began, the Persian army faced fundamental problems. While heavy cavalry had proved efficient against Roman armies, it was too slow and regimented to act with full force against the agile and unpredictable lightly-armed Arab cavalry and foot archers.
The Persian army did meet with a few initial successes. War-elephants temporarily stopped the Arab army, but when Arab veterans returned from the Syrian fronts where they had been fighting
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax against Byzantine armies, they taught the Arab army how to deal with these beasts. Thus, war-elephants lost their effectiveness.
These factors contributed to the decisive Sassanid defeat at the Battle of al-Qādisiyyah. The Persians, who had only the generation before conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, lost decisive battles when nimble, lightly-armed Arabs accustomed to skirmishes and desert warfare attacked them.
Soveraine 3 months ago
Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
See, they looked pretty much just like GREEKS in the GREEK ceramic art! They were closely related, you simpleton. LOL! :-)
You admit Greeks had golden (good) skin, and were dark in complexion, and guess what, so were the Persians shown in Greek ceramic vase are! You lose really bad here.
Again: Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
LOL! ;-)
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax The Islamic conquest of Persia (633–656) led to the end of the Sasssanid and the eventual decline of the Zoroastrian religion in Persia. However, the achievements of the previous Persian civilizations were not lost, but were to a great extent absorbed by the new Islamic polity.
No, the Greeks have giant fat noses. Like jews do, almost like a beast's snout.
Persians had very thin and small noses, with tiny nostrils. Extremely contrasting.
They also left their hair long, to protect
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Them from the sun there.
So not only heavy clothes, small noses normal for white people, titles like Rex, battles against Turks, Arabs, Romans and Greeks.
But even the Xenophon greek author calls the Persians \"White|" in greek writing no less. They admit persians are as white as the europeans.
That's why Aristotle considered both europeans and persians as "white weaklings". Because they were just as white and unprotected against sunstroke and heat and sunlight.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax What ceramic vase shows persians as golden skinned?
Are you high, or just lying through your teeth?
Name it, then, idiot.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine The skin color could not be made on that kind of art, since there was only two color shades: black and very light color of background. They could not make tan-like colors with it, you moron, so even if someone was olive skin light tan colored, they could not make it look that way in those ceramic pot art pieces.
Actual ancient Persian wall art shows a PERSIAN SOLDIER with brownish type skin tone, but you deny that with more twist/spin BS so typical of your INSECURE kind. lol! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Yes, but that is not the reason Persians are white.
It's because the only ones knows as Persians, were seen as "evil" and "wicked", by Arab and Greek Racists, who only thought their own gold skin is "superior" to pale skin.
Just like you do now. You confirm those savages were Racist against whites, and Jealous of the Persian Reich. Which was even led by "Pers Rex", which is obviously a Gothic title.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax That shows an Arab. Again. The brown skin, belong to the Hindus and Arab or even Turks, who invaded from the Orient.
The ones showing persians are not coloured. Even the skeleton and skull of that persian soldier they unburied, has normal, thin nose unlike the iranian or arab with fat large noses.
And a soft, smooth forehead, typical for white people of higher intellect.
That persian soldier doesn't have a subhuman skull like you do.
You know this, you saw that article, yes?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Did you search the one I gave you?
The persian skeleton found under caved walls, with other roman soldiers? At a battle between persians and romans? Well did you?
That skull of a persian soldier, looks nothing like your ugly semitic skulls. Find one trait on that persian's skull that you think looks like anything you semites or other desert rats have.
Well? Do so. Find your evidence that persians were not white, but semitic, on that actual persian skull.
I await, fool.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Describe the clothes of those brownies.
Yellow knots on their black blue heads? Asians have that blue highlight to their black hair, and spiky hair.
That is now present in actual persian people who are white, and don't have straight or blue highlighted hairs.
Soveraine 3 months ago
Again, the Persian has small ears. The Greek has big fat ears.
Again, the persian has small White ears. The Greek has big fat African ears.
Again ...... small ears for the white persian on the left.
Again .... big ears for the gold skin semite greek on the right.
Again .... skin protection against sunburn and sunstroke for the white persian on the left.
Again ... no protection against sun for the subhuman greek on the right.
Again?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine
Greeks did not need protection from the sun, since they don't burn like pale vampires in the sun like your thin-skinned people burn to red crisp. Greeks do not live in the desert, so they do not need protection from blowing sand like Middle Easterners do, you dimwit. lol! Greeks had plate armor to wear, as well. Much of it too heavy to run far in, especially in the heat, so keeping it light was the key, you simpleton dimwit. lol!
Northax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax The persians had better conditions and luxuries than any greek.
They had chariots, veils, cloths, decorated shelters. Many things that make them less in harm's way from desert anything.
Do you know why? Because as white people, the persians needed those "luxuries". Their living style did not require them to wear protection from desert, because they lived a lot better than greek naked savages, who occasionally wore skirts .....
Enough said?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Ancient Greek frescoes show GREEKS with chariots from 1300 B.C. and before then, as well, and clothes, advanced decorated shelters, among many other luxuries. WOW you're so ignorant!
Persians were not "white" like Germanics are white. Persians were Semitic Middle Eastern type peoples of similar blood to ancient Greeks, Israelites, and other peoples of west Asia.
Your jealousy of Persian history and attempt to claim it as yours makes you look needy and pathetic, like Africentrics.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax Who did you steal them from, piggy?
Greeks are mercenaries and thieves. You stole things from Europeans and Persians, then pretended like it's yours.
Disgusting. You know you don't belong in Europe right?
Europe is only for whites. And Middle east? Only for white Persians.
Arabs turks greeks romans, are all mudskins who belong in the swamps. Drowned in the dirty rivers of Tigrus and Eufrates, that have the same mud as your skin in color.
Now silence, subhuman. You know your place.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Iranians are semitic middle eastern people of similar blood to greeks jews and west asians.
Persians are white. That's the end of it.
The reason you call it Iran instead of Persia, is because the white persians are ONLY A MINORITY.
Persians are just a minority in Iran now. But more numerous around the Black Sea, which was several times overwhelmed by Persian armies from both sides, when fighting the Scythians or Macedonians.
This explains why we're here in Europe. We stayed here !!!
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax And what's your proof, piggy?
Oink and Squeel all you like, Piglet. You cannot even prove your lies, using the persian skeleton found near the roman skeletons, that I showed you how to find.
Why? Because that persian doesn't have subhuman semitic or turanid features in the skull. Simple as such.
Wiggle all you like, in the mud, Piggy. Everyone with mind who researches this, now looks at you as a slave and subhuman who tried to steal white history, .... but failed and is now humiliate
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax You managed to scream your way out of being defeated by "Germanics", I suppose, no? By seeing the past comments here, before I proved your stupidity.
But there's no way you could win against me, a true persian. Since White Persians defeated the Greeks, and even used you cowards as our slaves and mercenaries.
It's quite possible that white persians were in Greece much longer than you semitic sandy faces Africans that pretend to be greeks.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Actually this history is known ... The Pelasgian people were in Greece first? I believe?
They have black hair and pale skin, like the Persians do. Also pink lips, not purple or yellow like your Asian monsters.
Then the Acheans or Elleni tribes from the North like Gaul, came down to Pelasg, and were accepted by the pelasgian / persian people.
Then your semitic, fat nosed, frizzy haired sandy faced, homogreeksexuals invaded Europe and the Balkans. From Africa or something ....
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine You are a raving lunatic.
jaquie321 1 month ago
@Northax So according to normal European history, that is likely censored in propaganda fueled dictatorships like yours or Greece's, white people were here before the :"greeks".
The Helleni or Acheans were blue eyed blondes from Gaul, northern parts of Europe. Yes!!!
And the Pelasgi or Persians, were black haired.
And both are here before you semites crawled out of the sandy african dunes, running from nigger bedouin rapists. Who taught you homosexuality, I'm sure.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax: Persians were not Semites and unlike today, you could clearly tell a Persian from a Greek (which one, black or white?) and those two from Israelites and most certainly "others peoples from west Asia." You must not confuse the totally mixed up peoples of today from the mixed up peoples from yesteryear. Yes, Greeks did start off black and dealt only with Asia and Africa - not Europe. The traits of whites follow them - homosexuality, killing and tricks.
ReturnoftheBrotha 3 months ago
@ReturnoftheBrotha Haha! Don't you wish, you silly Afrocentric "Brotha"? LOL! Sorry, but your Afro-propaganda "history" isn't working here, either. You also show your insecurity, just like this Austrian idiot trying to claim Persians looked like white people with pale white skin. Not going to happen here. You should go look up West African history and be happy with that, not claim someone elses history, it just makes you look needy and pathetic, like any Nordicist moron trying to claim Egypt.
Northax 3 months ago
@ReturnoftheBrotha
You're primarily wrong based on your biased propaganda. Bottom line, you're a racist (hater of whites) and I dealt with manipulators like you! Rejecting about ever supported, evidence and documented text book in the world, based on subject maters, such as this one, ONLY to support and subjugate the idea everything in the world was founded, discovered, and, or created by tribal Negroid Africans groups (Sub-Saharan).
jahellaspartan 3 months ago
@jahellaspartan: Those are your words not mine... YOU wrote "sub-Saharan" while I do not use those terms because I am dealing with the Saharan black man as seen in Libya and Darfur. The historical record (not the white man's conclusions) are more than clear. The white man is from Asia which is why he calls himself a caucASIAN and not European! The record is also clear that the black man was in every land on earth prior to others. The white man can claim homosexulaity as his...
ReturnoftheBrotha 3 months ago
@ReturnoftheBrotha The term "Caucasian" had nothing to do with the people being from Asia....it had to do with being from the Caucasus, which is just north of Georgia, and NOT in Asia, but South-Eastern Europe. The "White man" descended from Africans, and developed an extremely pale skin tone from being in the forested, mountainous, extremely cold areas of the area described above.
Bloodmoon17 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Suddenly you are quiet?
Suddenly your ground dissappeared from beneath your feet?
Suddenly you have nothing more to say, you greek serpent?
Suddenly your lies are extinguished from you?
Suddenly you realise how utterly defeated you are.
You're welcome!
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Again, the Phrygian cap is worn commonly by "Ciobans" in Europe. They're shepherds, who gained their name from "Shah Ban" of Persia.
That cap is kept by the persians when they became shepherds in Europe. Most shepherds still have that cap as traditional, original wear, and the name "cioban" from "shah ban", the persian.
Again, giant fat greek ears of a semite. Small thin ears of a white persian.
Again?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine
Sorry, but your ancestors were not the Persians, lol! Before A.D. times, your ancestors lived in Northern Europe solely and lived primitively compared to Rome, Greece or Persia. This is why there's no seriously big history of huge structures in northern Europe like there is a HUGE history known WORLDWIDE of Persians, Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, etc. ALL seen today, and they were ALL built in B.C. times, before Germanic/Nordic invasions stole/trashed many things.
YOU LOSE!
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax I never said they were.
Only europeans with black hair and pale skin, are originally Persians. And not europeans, or that related to other white races.
Mingrelians, and other people in Bulgaria, or near the Danube, even Balkans, basically around the Black Sea, which is upper side of the Persian Reich, now has these women mostly, of Persian ancestry.
And they are nothing like the swarthy skinned people in their regions. They are pale, and with the darkest hair.
Not like subhumans...
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax And why would germanic people mix with the Arab or Turkish invaders of the Persian empire, to have children which now you claim only have black hair because of Asian invaders who were only enemies of the Persians?
This truly makes no sense, but still you have to provide cases of which Germanic people with light hair, admit to have accepted non-white savages with black hair as their family.
Unless you find this, how can you prove those are not the PErsians, despite looking alike?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine You've been seriously brainwashed to believe Persians were "white" like you? LMAO! Such a simpleton dolt you are. You only believe this crap because it puffs your pride up to make you feel better about yourself (since you must be a loser IRL). Typical Nazi loser, always trying to steal someone elses history and claim it as their own! Wow! Such losers! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax And what makes you, the Idiot, believe that black hair is unique to Iranians or Hindus ?
What makes you think White Races are unable to have black hair? Well? What's your evidence that says the black hair pigment cannot be found in the genes of fair people?
The yellow skin pigment, or caroten that you greeks and other enemies of the White Persians, have, does not create black hair.
Caroten is the pigment only for yellow skin. One can still have black hair, without caroten pigment.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Or, you are jealous that the Europeans were right about something.
And Persians were a great White Empire, than your little greedy greek piglets, or the savage arab or turks that later hoarded up with their light armour, since they did not require heavy armor and skin protection, like the persians always had .....
Humiliated much, subhuman? Are you afraid the Whites were right, after all?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax The greek also wears a skirt.
The persian wears thick skin clothes, like stockings almost. Which is normal for Europeans to wear.
Many tradition european outfits of white people, have that ankle low leggings that cover their legs. This is to protect their pale skin from damage or sand or dust or burns, and so on.
This is why white people are civilised. This is why the persians were white, and considered more civilised than their non-white neighbours (romans, arabs, greeks and turks).
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Your Germanic / Nordic pale white ancestors with blond/red hair had NOTHING to do with ancient Persia. LOL! Art and historical facts prove me RIGHT! You just have no ancient civilized history as Nordics up in northern Europe, so you're desperate to try and claim other peoples' advanced civilized history, like the DARK Semitic Persians of ancient time! YOU are no different than desperate Afrocentric liars attempting to do the same. So what do you think about that?
You're sad!
Northax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Ancient Persians did not have blonde or red hair. Only the Scythians and macedonians are described as "Xanthokroi", with reddish hair.
The Persians are shown dominantly with black hair, and contrasting pale skin.
That's why only the Persians had a dualist religion, where White symbolised good and justice, while Black symbolised evil and Ahura Mazda.
Only the persians had those colors, black hair and white skin. Only they considered themselves good, because of their white skin.
WEll?
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Because persians did not live in Europe then.
The persians with black hair, retreated into the Black Sea, like Bulgaria or Georgia as Mingrelians.
There are many legends in Europe, of Black haired voyvods and emperor who came from the East, to found realms in Europe (near the Black Sea).
The blonde hair and red haired people were nomadic. They did not need any civilisation that Persians developed out of need, in the Orient.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Persians are pale as well. Look at Mingrelians in east Black Sea, or persian women in Bulgaria (about 30-40% in the country side I saw them).
Palest of skins in the country, and blackest of hair. That's what persians were like in "persian art", especially of the women, who look the same as the ancient persian girls.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine No, dumbass. Those women are likely a mixture of Germanic / Nordic genes (thus the pale white skin) and Asiatic or Mediterranean genes (thus black hair, or brown eyes, etc.).
So much mixture with Germanics has happened over the last 1500 years, you cannot say who is who compared to looking at the ancient from Persia.
Persians are Middle Eastern with olive skin tone, black hair, brown eyes, pretty much just like indigenous southern Europeans (close cousins).
Keep living in denial.
Northax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax What would germanic genes be doing in Iran, dear subhuman?
Go to google images now. Search for "Zakaria: Comparing the status of women in Iran and Saudi Arabia "
The first woman (persian minority, just like the scythian minority) you will see has a green veil on her head, black hair, pale skin and pink lips.
No fat ears like your arabs or greeks, no giant nostrils adapted to desert heat or sand. No subhuman features at all.
Just normal female features of a white female. Now search
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Now search "Persian Women Warriors".
And behold the same pale skin, black hair, and pink lips.
Contrasting deeply, with the dark skins of Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Turks. All of whom were bitter enemies (as in to the death enemies) as in Mortal Enemies, to those white Persians.
Yes, persians were white. Now wallow in your self loathe, for knowing Greece fell before Persia ever did, with greeks as traitors and power hungry piglets.
While persians retreated to europe, north of persia.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Germanics don't have pale white skin.
That's where your theory falls completely.
The people with light hair, blonde or red, rarely have skin as white as persians do here, in Europe.
People with black hair, have paler skin, than the blondes or red hairs do.
So obviously the mixture isn't there. You can't just say pale skin was inherited from Germanic people with less pale skin.
Germanic people actually have the yellow caroten pigment, in their hair. So their skin can tan after long.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Then why don't these pale persians with black hair, have any germanic features?
Why no flat noses, with giant nostrils? Why no elephant ears? Why no yellow caroten pigment as dominant?
Why the pale skin than germanic skin, and why the hair darker than yours, and without the Asian/ Turks blue shimmer than only their spiky straight asian hair has?
Why the silky soft black hair, with white shine instead? Why no oils in that hair, like you asians have? Hm?
You are Humiliate.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Olive Skin tone? Black hair with blue highlights? Brown Eyes?
That is how the Turkish and Arab enemies of the Persians had.
Read Arab Persian Wars.
Read Azeri Turks invasion of Persia, from the Caucassus.
That's how they look. The enemies of the Persians, who were white.
Look for "azeri jews in the Caucassus". Those jews and turks, are what you describe.
They are turanoid or semitic. But not White or Persian, in the least ... Just enemies of the White Persians, as history says.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Again, this isn't about Eurocentrism.
It's about White Supremacism.
The White Persians were racist against the jews, until the Whore of Babylon tricked the persians into accepting the non-white jews into Persia.
This lead to the weakening of the White Persian Reich.
The Persian Zoroastrianism or Mazdayanism, proves they saw white people as "Good", because of their pale skin. And PErsians being white themselves, they logically had that religion of Dualism.
And their white skin proof
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Just because you don't know about civilizations in Europe, before you subhumans crawled along like sea gypsies, doesn't mean they didn't existed.
They were strong enough to defeat you faggots, so they obviously had civilization and culture. The Vinland / Finland realm is acknowledged by the latino arabs of Rome.
They even say that Vinland spread from Finland (Scandinavia) to the New World (Canada).
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax The dark semitic Arabs of that time, wearing Arabic clothes like the Muslims, and yellow knots on their fat heads, and blue dye hair, are Arabs.
The Persians didn't die their hair blue. Arabs did. And arabs also wore yellow knots tiaras on their heads.
So you confuse the white persians who fled Persia into Black Sea and Europe, with semitic Arabs who looked exactly like those dark skinned blue haired monkeys.
Questions, subhuman?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax So what are you going to do then?
Kill every white person in Europe, with black hair, just to prove that they are not persians?
Search "Bulgarian girl plays Gajda". I will find the exact title right now.
She's a bulgarian from Balkans, has black hair, very wavey but not oily or curly like greeks or arabs or other semitic trash, and pale skin.
That's a true persian, just like you see persian women in persian art.
Are you going to be in denial any much longer? Their skins are white.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Bulgarian Music Bagpipe Kaba Gaida Каба Гайда
that's the exact title, I copied it from my favourites.
Look at her entire performance, and see how persian she is. Pale skin, of course, like all superior beings.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Bulgarian Music Bagpipe Kaba Gaida Каба Гайда HQ
You can even watch the HQ version, to better see her thin nose and other normal white features.
Also her black persian hair, and white skin.
I've seen many girls like that in Bulgaria, how do you explain them?
Are you going to kill every white person in Europe with black hair and pale skin, just to prove persians weren't white?
How do you explain white persians here in East Europe, closest to the former borders of the Persian Reich?
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Iranians have giant ears. They look more like the greeks in those vases or murals. Big ears are a sign of subhumans with desert adaptations, and coloured skin.
White skin has small ears, and thin nose, with very tiny nostrils. Persians have this in real life, in Europe, as well as in ancient murals of persians.
Now do you understand why the need for heavy armor and clothing? White persians in Europe have the same skin burn problem and sunstroke, so we used the heavy persian armor.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Also read the entire "Arab-Persian Wars", article, on militaryphotos (dot) net.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax The complexion is white?
Does this mean the greek is also white? Of course not.
It just means they payed attention to anything other than skin colour. Because greeks felt already inferior because they had skin of Arabs or Turks or Jews.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax So apparently wearing leggings and trousers and actual clothing or having white skin, was to you idiots a sign of "barbarism"?
While wearing Absolutely Nothing, or wearing Skirts made greeks, romans, and other such filth, "Civilised"?
Let me guess, you also considered giant ears like the semites would have as "civilised ears".
And coloured skin as a sign of maturity, like a fruit is ripe to be eaten when it's most coloured.
You're just another anti-white racist who hates white races
Soveraine 3 months ago
They were Semitic Middle Eastern people, no matter HOW you try and twist it. They had black hair, yep, just like Middle Easterners have black hair. They did NOT have blonde hair! The Nordicist idiots try to claim they had blonde hair, yet again insecurely trying to claim someone ELSES ancient advanced history, because Germanics know their ACTUAL history is PRIMITIVE in northern Europe. They hate reading the words of ROMANS claiming Germanics as PRIMITIVE, DIRTY, UNCIVILIZED, etc. lol! Awww! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax The baso-relief of a persian soldiers shows a german moustache?
But how can such be? Gothic title of Rex, german moustache.
Evidence just piles against you, idiotic Wog.
Your apologies are accepted. You are but ... subhuman.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine German mustache? LOL! No such thing, you simpleton. Anyone with heavy facial hair (like Middle Eastern peoples of Semitic blood) can easily have such mustaches, YOU DOLT! LMAO! WOW!
Go to Google Image search and type in: Persian soldier art
DO IT! I dare you! Now look at the pictures of Persian soldiers with curly black beards, light brown skin tone. MIDDLE EASTERN SEMITIC PERSIANS!
Damn, you're so dimwitted. lol!
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax False. Middle easterners of Turanoid origins, have black with blue highlights.
The Asians and other Central asians or Turkic people, have that same blue shine to their oily disgusting hairs.
That oil that gives their hair the spiky, straight, blackish brown hair with blue reflections proves they're Turanic, and Central Asians.
The Persians had wavey and silky black hair. It was not blueish spiky, or semitic brown.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Go to Google Image search and type in: Greek Persian duel
See, they looked pretty much just like GREEKS in the GREEK ceramic art! They were closely related, you simpleton. LOL! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax Cuerda seca tiles, also show the persians as pale skinned, with black hair.
Look for Mingrelians, the people of Colchis, before they were invaded by Georgians (who are Greek Armenians).
The mingrelians have the same pale skin and black hair that the true persian had.
Enjoying your lesson, imbecile? You're welcome. Defeating you was very easy, for me!
And you?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine The Greeks in their own ceramic vase art show Persians to be just like them in looks, and you admit Greeks were gold skin peoples, lolol! You just got owned. Bye now, for good this time. You lose. lol ! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax They were nothing at all "the same" in looks. They are very different actually.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Almost 2,000 years ago, 19 Roman soldiers rushed into a cramped underground tunnel, prepared to defend the Roman-held Syrian city of Dura-Europos from an army of Persians digging to undermine the city's mudbrick walls. But instead of Persian soldiers, the Romans met with a wall of noxious black smoke that turned to acid in their lungs. Their crystal-pommeled swords were no match for this weapon;
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax the Romans choked and died in moments, many with their last pay of coins still slung in purses on their belts.
Nearby, a Persian soldier — perhaps the one who started the toxic underground fire — suffered his own death throes, grasping desperately at his chain mail shirt as he choked.
Find that article and finish reading it, Piglet.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax You can see the very narrow jaw, forehead and nose base, of the Persian soldier found as a skeleton there.
Why you think that is the skull of a semite, I cannot say. Maybe you are payed by Iranian propagandists? HAHAHAHA.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Germanics are not and were never "primitive". Germany is the most advanced nation in Europe today and their Scandinavian cousins are also very advanced. There is absolutely no basis for your statement...nothing.
ancestoralmemory 1 month ago
@ancestoralmemory sorry historically (meaning the ancient past), Germanics as well as Slavics were not as advanced as Southern Europeans or Mediterraneans.
SandraLondon63 3 weeks ago
@SandraLondon63 weren't they called barbarians... so why the ego when it comes to this subrace, just because some look more attractive aesthetically, doesn't mean they are a 'better' or more supreme race at all... intelligence and innovation is more important to making a civilisation 'great'.... which i believe the Mediterraneans were, there's no comparison. From an Alpinid lol
Lilim27 2 weeks ago
@SpiritusPatriae Germanic presumed tribes allied with Rome, as their legionaires or mercenaries, sometimes.
They were not always "germanic" per-say, and I didn't think they were slaves either.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@SpiritusPatriae Maybe you're not, but some Nazi idiot Nordicists try to say Greeks had blonde hair and blue eyes, as if they're Germanic, which they weren't. They do this because they're envious of ancient Greek advanced civilization, of which their actual ancestors had no part in. They have this "genetic superiority complex" they must keep puffed up with lies and falsehoods. This includes an attempt to show "Germanic continuity" throughout ancient advanced civilizations. They're pathetic.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax I thought only the Acheans had blonde hair or blue eyes, because they arrived in Greece from the north?
They were most likely Gauls (ancient French people like Jeanne D'Arc). They were too white to be Greek, that's for certain.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@SpiritusPatriae
The Romans did hold Germanic people as slaves, maybe not most, but they did hold some. I never said they held all of them, but it's recorded in history, that the Romans used to cut the light hair off of Germanic slaves and wear the hair as wigs.
Northax 3 months ago
@SpiritusPatriae You hate truth, I see. lol! Germanics were slaves in Roman empire. Sucks to know that, huh? SLAVS - SLAVES.
Northax 3 months ago
If greeks put it together then it's prolly as wrong as it can get :p
AnnabelLolita 3 months ago
She was chubby! Hehe just kidding.
VictumRoManius 3 months ago
I would love to reconstruct faces in this way bringing the past alive i really envy their task.
richard68ization 4 months ago
That reconstruction should have black curly hair, not red-light brown. Some Greeks did dye their hair red colors back then using henna, but a girl so young, would not do that.
Look up Ancient Greek frescoes on Google Image search, you'll see black curly hair on ancient Greeks from around 5th century B.C.
The light colors were very rare, and only was around because of dying hair light with henna and other materials.
These Germanic Nazis want to claim Greece, but it's not theirs! lol
Northax 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Greece is full of subhuman arabs and turks. You are Egyptians who belong in Africa.
No one cares about Greece.
Originally it belonged to White Macedonians (dominantly with red hair like the Scythians).
Again, the Acheans in Greece, were blue eyed and blonde, but not because they were Greek. Because they were white europeans from the north, possibly Gaul.
They were never Germanic or any of that Nazi legend.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine LOL! You're another lying sack of shit Germanic idiot. No, original Greeks did not have red hair. Again, ancient Greek color frescoes show BLACK hair, brown eyed people, you lying idiot. lol! Greeks did not have blonde hair or blue eyes, you liar. Stop spreading more lies, you jealous moron. lol!
The only reason the Germanic tribes (yes, all of them are Germanic, stop lies) successfully invaded Rome was because the Western part was temp. in decline.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax Greeks are lying sacks, actually.
I never said original greeks ever had red hair, You utterly useless cow.
Scythians and Macedonians had red hair. They conquered you, the gold skinned, subhuman greek savages from Africa and Crete.
I never said Greeks had blonde hair or blue eyes, you filthy lying twat pie. I said the Acheans who invaded Greece from the north (White Europe), were Gauls. And they had blue eyes or blonde hair.
Those are not Germanic tribes, you pathetic faggot.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Sure, but black hair or brown eyes, don't decide the race.
They could have been romans as well. With giant fat ears, and black curly hair, and brown eyes.
They have those you know. They're not White, just subhuman semites from Africa.
Yes I am aware of those frescas, subhuman. Unlike you, who ignores that those were not really white Europeans. Only african pieces of trash, with golden skin.
Greeks were racist against Whites, how could you idiots ever be "civilised"? You're Animaloid
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Again, Hereminius or Arminius was Gallic. Blue eyed blonde is how Gauls looked like, north of the roman impire.
You're just latinos. Subhuman nobodies from Africa. Islam would have been your fate, except you invaded europe before that, so you avoided becoming suicide bombers.
Greeks have Oriental Accents. And a piece of trash vomit you call a language.
Curly hair and brown eyes, like frescas of ancient greeks, are SEMITIC AFRICANS. Not Whites, not Europeans.
You subhuman filth.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Jealous of what? You ignorants were easily defeated and enslaved both by persians who used greeks as mercenaries, and by macedonians who were white europeans, that became your masters.
And also used you as cannon-fodder so to speak. Greeks were only pedophiles and weaklings. Not even white, so of course you were enslaved in Europe, before the christian era Even Began!!!
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax What are the "lies" I would be spreading, again?
Acheans were from north, inland Europe. Possibly Gauls. Who were a pre-germanic tribe of France. A gallic people that spoke gallic, which was kept in some french words and other gaulo-celtic or romanche dialects north of the roman borders.
They were nothing not in the least "Germanic". They were Gauls. That's it. Arminius was a Gaul. The Germanic name is just a misunderstanding, and you throw it around like an ignorant cow.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax The Eastern part payed Tribute, to white people north of the Danube, because they feared the Slavs, Goths, and other white people of Europe.
The West refused to pay tribute to Europeans, so you were demolished, and we took our tribute straight from Rome.
The West fell because your entire so called civilization was imaginary and just a myth. You were subhuman wogs, who fell to superior white armies of Europe, very easily. We even had territory advantage.
Rome was a joke. As are you.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Again, you disgusting pig vomit. They were not Germanic tribes. Arminius of the Gaulic "Creusci" tribe, was actually Allied to Rome and the romans.
They fought by your side, against "germanic" tribes, or other enemies of Rome.
The only time they defeated Rome, and became as you say "germanic" was when the Gauls (not Germanic either), rallied by Arminius / Hermann, defeated the Romans of the West.
This is where you utter stupidity loses focus of History and slurs into madness.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax The West was not in decline. IT was always pathetic and worthless.
The East survived because they payed tribute to the white people of Europe, north of their borders.
They payed tribute to the Goths, and when Philip the Arab imperator of Rome, refused to pay that tribute (romans get greedy and keep the tribute for your gay orgies), you were defeated at Abrittus.
Where not only the next roman imperator and son were killed, but general surrendered, and resumed payment of tribute.Slave.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Germani tribes were given permission to live just north of Rome because they came down since the invasions of Mongol tribes forced them to, but some Germanic tribes knew they wanted to invade Rome and steal ADVANCED technology the Germanic tribes did not make themselves. You can label them all different things, Gauls, whatever, they were all mainly of similar blood who had pale white skin, blue/green eyes, red or blonde hair - Germanic. Stop your spin, propagandist. lol!
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax They were not Germanic, lying whore.
They were Gothic, from Black Sea and Carpathians. The ones who destroyed your dacian province, creating Gottyuda instead.
They were Arian Christians who defeated your inferior pagan cultists, with ease.
Then they destroyed half of your empire, while the other half payed tribute to keep their greek faggot asses alive.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine When I say Germanic, I mean ALL people indigenous to northern Europe, you stupid dimwit. Haven't caught on yet? Too slow in the head? lol! :-)
Arian? No, dimwit. Aryans are originally from Iran, aka Persians. You stupid Nazi dolt Germanics tried to steal the label "Aryan" to claim as your own. Your simpleton Nazi Germanic ancestors in WWII also tried to steal the symbol of swastika and claimed it as their own, when it was NOT theirs. That's ancient symbol from India, and elsewhere.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax Iran doesn't exist. It's just a stupid name, used by Alanic or Sarmatian subhumans.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax Aryan means noble. Just like the pale skinned, Etruscans were the Patricians in the Roman Empire.
They had blonde hair and blue eyes, predominantly as well. That's why Hitler used that ideal as Aryan.
They were trying to revive the Catholic Roman Empire, of the Holy Roman Empire, that was there before Germany was.
The blue eyed blondes, were white Patricians of Rome, yes. And they did rule the Empire as Aryan Nobles.
True Story.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine LMAO! What history books do you read? Ones written by Nazi Nordicists, obviously. You're quite brainwashed. lol! Majority of Etruscan color frescoes show brown skinned, curly black haired people in them, actually. Go do another Google Image search on that, silly Nordicist. lolol! Blondes were CLEAR minority in Etruscan art, thus obviously hinting at BLONDES being from a FOREIGN (northern) source of people, not the actual indigenous Etruscans with DARK complexions. LOL! You lack logic.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax The Spread of Human Rights
From Babylon, the idea of human rights spread quickly to India, Greece and eventually Rome. There the concept of “natural law” arose, in observation of the fact that people tended to follow certain unwritten laws in the course of life, and Roman law was based on rational ideas derived from the nature of things.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Persia WAS NOT WHITE, you simpleton dolt. LMAO! You're so ignorant, it's amazing. But that's the mental disease known as Nordicist Nazism. lol! Persians were Middle Eastern Semitic peoples, you're jealous of their history because YOUR ancestors had nothing to do with Persians.
Greeks and Romans are closely related to Middle Eastern Persians and Semitics, and you hate hearing that, because it destroys your pride which was built up on falsehoods. lol!
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax You are not related.
Romans and greeks are subhumans. You were enemies of the Persians.
See "Countless wars between Persians and Greeks or Romans".
Wow, really? You were related to your most hated enemies? So funny! Why not related to white europeans, if you were such bitter enemies then?
You idiocy knows no boundaries. Just as I suspected.
Your final verdict is Subhuman.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Then why would Persians be racist against Jewish semites?
Explain that, idiot.
Whites are naturally racist against jews and other semites.
Explain the Persians warring against Arabs, I will put the links now.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax Years of warfare between Sassanids and Byzantines, as well as the strain of the Khazar invasion of Transcaucasia (Third Perso-Turkic War, exhausted both armies. With no effective ruler following Khosrau II, societal chaos, and problems in provincial administration (until Yazdegerd III, the Persian army lost potency. Yazdegerd III lacked experience and didn't try to rebuild the army.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax When Arab squadrons made their first raids into Sassanid territory, Yazdegerd III didn't consider them a threat, and he refused to send an army to encounter the invaders. When the main Arab army reached the Persian borders, Yazdegerd III procrastinated in dispatching an army against the Arabs. Even Rostam-e Farokhzad, who was both Eran Spahbod and Viceroy, didn't see the Arabs as a threat. Without opposition, the Arabs had time to consolidate and fortify their positions.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax The persians themselves were overran by Turks from the Caucassus, as well as Arab invaders.
The same ones who call themselves Iranian now.
How could the persians be invaded by someone who was their own people? Impossible now.
The turks and arabs were enemies who destroyed the Persian Empire.
Just like romans and greeks were bitter enemies of the Persians. So the White Persians held back your dirty roman / greek / arabian / turkish bastards for a lot. Considering 4 to 1 odds, haha.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax
Documents asserting individual rights, such as the Magna Carta (1215), the Petition of Right (1628), the US Constitution (1787), the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789), and the US Bill of Rights (1791) are the written precursors to many of today’s human rights documents.
See? The white persians are the Source of inspiration for the subhuman trash of greece and romans.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax They likely started their excavations 130 feet (40 meters) away from the city, in a tomb in Dura's underground necropolis. Meanwhile, the Roman defenders dug their own countermines in hopes of intercepting the tunneling Persians.
Found it yet?
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Northax If you're reffering to those Gypsies with yellow knots on their Blue Hair, with Blue Beards, I hope you realise that Persians didn't really have blue beards and blue hair.
Are you an idiot or something? They're niggers who wear islam robes, and have a yellow bandana made of knots on their heads.
If you think those are persians, you are truly as idiotic as most greek subhumans are.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Denial, denial. You typed in Persian soldier art and found that, but the truth hurts so much! Middle Eastern Semites can have curly hair, and brown skin, without being black African, you ignorant dolt. You didn't even know that! LMAO! Such a moron! You lost the debate, now you get desperate! LMAO! Poor Nazi idiot, what a loser you are. That's actual PERSIAN ART, idiot! They know what they looked like! LOL!
Greeks show Persians in their own Greek art look similar to Greeks, lol! DARK
Northax 3 months ago
@Soveraine By the way, Persians had blue hair dye back then, as well, so it was most likely dyed hair, thus why it's blue. Again, try reading up on hair dye used by the ancients. You simpleton ignoramus. :-)
Truth hurts you, I can see it. lol! GREEK ARt shows Persians as dark and swarthy, just like Greeks back then. Did you see the ceramic art I told you to look up?
Truth hurts when you LIVE a lie, like you do daily. lol! :-)
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax Blue hair die?
So you think Persians were niggers who died their hair blue?
Wow, you are pathetic, and utterly desperate.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax What ceramic art?
The Greeks are shown as naked (and not white because you turned darker like animals).
And Persians always with heavy clothing or armor on them. For protection of their skins, from burning and sunstroke.
And do you know who suffers from that? White people alone.
There, what more do you want, subhuman?
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Northax The Arab squadrons defeated the Persian army in several more battles culminating in the Battle of Nihawānd .
the last major battle of the Sassanids. The Sassanid dynasty came to an end the following year with the death of Yazdegerd III
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Christians? Hahaha! Christianity is a MIDDLE EASTERN Semitic religion, genius! Didn't know that, either? WOW, you're clueless!
You're seriously in denial. You're a waste of time to even talk to anymore. People reading these posts will laugh at you. They can look up everything I speak about and see it's logically true. Persia - Middle East - Middle Easterners. Romans/Greeks in south had dark complexion, thus adapted to sunny environment, etc. Ancient art proves their look, as well.
Northax 3 months ago
@Northax Art? So you faggots think you're civilised because you had statues or pottery, where you appear naked?
Talk about Animaloid behaviour from Africa.
Can't deny your Gorrila Ancestry now, Mongrel!! Your dirty skin proves you're not White or European.
Soveraine 3 months ago
@Soveraine Bye now, simpleton, descendent of primitive tribal Germanic barbarians who had no advanced civilization until they came in contact with DARK AND SWARTHY southern European Romans and Greeks in around 300-500 A.D. LOL!
You hate learning REAL history of your (very) primitive ancestors, huh? You were just as primitive as Negroids in sub-Sahara Africa back then, and that stabs your "pride" (built on falsehoods) right in the heart. lol! I can sense it! LOL! History embarrasses you pales.
Northax