Added: 4 years ago
From: MusicFann213
Views: 132,519
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (212)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That singer dude reminds me of david tennant.

  • You could learn a thing or two,Occupy.

  • love it!

  • The whole band but Scott's vocals are so great.

  • @MooreParanoid09 without scotts vocals theyd be shit....army for anyone

  • Not usually a fan over covers but STp, one of my most favorite bands... This is amazing. He did so great on this performance I love it.

  • fucking fantastic version ! STP rocked this great Beatles classic..Lennon would be proud !

  • Sc00t l00ks s0 fucking ho0t !!!

  • WAY TO GO i LOVE THIS SONG AND YOU DID WITH TRUE HEART SOUL YOU KICKED IT BUT GOOD LOVE JILLIAN

  • I saw this on TV the night they played it. It was great to hear this after the shock of those terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001.

  • @SlovakDJH so did I, I was 14, this performance inspired me to take up guitar playing.

  • J

    O

    H

    N

    Lennons birthday today

    Watch "Imagine" if you like him, & comment. They're coming in at like 10 a minute :-

  • Scott, my favorite vocalist, STP dreat, great band, great cover!!

  • Love the Beatles, love STP

  • scott knew stp had WAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY more magic than velvet revolver ever dreamed of having which is why they reunited.

  • I came in here without a lot of hope. Covers tend to suck; bands try to make them their own song. But this was amazing!

  • @Chavezstinks Oh these guys did make this their own. You can't make a good cover just by copying what other's did with it. You have to put your own heart, and soul into it, otherwise it's gonna suck. FTR: I loved the Beatles' version when I was 3. This song kicks ass to me now that I'm 19.

  • I love tits galore

  • AWESOME................

  • I jizzed in my pantzzzz

  • @megafan0258 Haha

  • F$%king Amazing..!!!!!!!!!

  • I'd already commented here before the one below, clicked it...my bad, anyways I'm pretty leery with covers of Great Songs. Especially where Beatles are concerned, but this ain't too bad! It doesn't hurt that it's STP, a band that I like. That wouldn't make any difference with this tune though. One of my all-time faves. Period. Billy Gibbons does it justice too.....this is such a Monster tune.....it takes balls to even try to cover it, & they got 'em! Good job.

  • great cover!, gran cover por lo general hay covers muy malos pero en este scott se lucio

  • Great Cover, the best I have ever heard!

  • These guys are good at covers. I like their Pour Some Sugar on Me.

  • @mlynn1231 not trying to be argumentative, but stp has never done pour some sugar on me, maybe you are thinking of somebody else!

  • @mduering81 Listen. I'm not annoyed with you, just people in general. I'm at that last straw point so please bear with me. Can people first just google shit before going on record like some expert on something they couldn't possibly be 100% certain of...especially when they're actually wrong?

    Googled the terms "stone temple pilots" "pour some sugar on me". first you'll notice lots of mp3s listed

    just click the first one and let that be a valuable lesson... k?

  • @mlynn1231 You are confused!! That mp3, says :"stp pour some sugar on me cover", but its deaf leapard acoustic version, search it here at you tube

    Next time dont be so cocky and let that be a valuable lesson... k?

  • @villamagua The only lesson I've learned is how bad you need to be right. But you're still wrong. My roommate in San Diego had the entire STP concert this was recorded in. Next time don't fucking worry about how cocky I am because you can't do a damn thing about it. Learn how to accept when your wrong and move the fuck on.

  • @mlynn1231 ok, show me the video

  • It's worth getting the DVD, some amazing performances that follow. Kevin spacey does an amazing job ... don't want to spoil it tho ;)

  • the beatles are so hard to cover though

  • @siloheaven t's best to try not to reinvent the song. The best Beatles covers are the ones that don't try to add a new twist.

  • Difficult song to cover, but I really like this one.

  • look, I like STP but I got to tell you that groove sounds like it's getting ready to fall apart.

  • @BlackSheepParty thats when its JUST RIGHT. they put a little rolling stones in their beatles. i like it

  • I love this band!

  • My favorites cover for this song.

  • AN EXCELLENT TRIBUTE!!!

    DJ

  • I remember seeing this live on TV, not long after 9/11 and it was part of a 2 hourlong tribute to John and his music. While nothing will top the original, this is a damn good cover.

  • There are a lot of silly people on this video.. Best live act in rock? Should do a Beatles cover album? Yeah, no. They just don't have the same feel as the Beatles do, not to mention their drummer is bad, and probably couldn't handle the randomness of Ringo's more complicated patterns if he couldn't handle this. =\

  • @narutozrasengan Stone temple pilots are an amazing band. Theyre not your taste? well thats not our problem. They are not like the beatles because you can never copy a band. And also, if you listened to this band you would notice that the drummer has actually complex rhythms. Get over it, its a great song, they did a great cover. End of story.

  • @Rock0Punk0Ska I never said that they weren't my taste of band, I actually like and listen to them. However, when it comes to the Beatles STYLE of music, they don't have anywhere near the same amount of energy and level of musicality that the Beatles had; as shown in this song. Simply put, it doesn't feel the same, at all. So for people to give them such high praise for doing such a sub par cover, to go as far as to say they should do an album cover, I felt compelled to correct them.

  • @narutozrasengan My apologies sire. I do believe an album cover would be excessive. I know they cant BE the beatles. Im just going to enjoy the song anywho. =)

  • @Rock0Punk0Ska It's all good man, by all means enjoy the song, I'm not knockin anyone for that. Just as long as they don't go overboard ;)

  • @narutozrasengan I don't know, this sounds pretty close to the original. But if you ask me the best Beatles cover is either Come Together by MJ from his Moonwalker movie or it's Come Together by Soundgarden.

  • @narutozrasengan It's a cover... Making it identifiable to the original is not the goal but to give it anew flavor. I think this is is a great cover.

  • @narutozrasengan Well, I feel compelled to repeat the the old addage "You know what they say about opinions", sure you're familiar with the rest of it. It looks as if alot of "people" (including myself) have a different way of seeing things......how is that a problem to be "corrected"?

  • 8 people aren't alright.

  • I'm thinking STP should do an album of Beatles covers next, its like their channeling the fab four here, spooky and awesome...

  • ´WEILAND = GENIUS

  • I don't know how people can say it's an awful cover. The Deleo's and Kretz absolutely nailed it, they might be the best live act in rock. Maybe people don't like Weiland's tone or style but that's all opinion.

    Just because you don't like the vocals doesn't make it a bad cover.

  • que buena versión, no me esperaba menos de él....

  • Scott the Chameleon ~ does it....yet again! A smashing good cover. Amazin voice! Amazin band!

  • revolution!

  • Comment removed

  • 8 DISLIKES ? PISSOFF!!!!!!

  • thumbs down for people asking for thumbs up

  • @10razonesgh MORONIC, YEAH YOU!

  • this could quite possible be the greatest beatle cover ever, thumbs up if you agree!!

  • @mduering81 Ray Charles doing Let it Be may take the cake

  • @mduering81 Close, but Joe Cocker's "high with a little help from my friends" is the only cover that rivals or bests an original Beatles recording...

  • @mduering81 Agreed!!!

  • I love this guy!!!!

  • good cover

  • Scott Weiland can cover anything and sound identical to the original

  • If I have been here, I would probably cry

  • awesome cover

  • What a great version....i always did like this band they are what rock and roll is supposed to sound like!

  • WTF! I never thought I would listen to such a good cover! STP rocks! Miss you John :(

  • This is actually a pretty good version. They really did the original justice !

  • Scott " The Chameleon" Weiland

  • Well what can I say, no cover is ever going to be as great as the Beatles' original version. However, this wasn't bad at all. The band is tight, and they're obviously paying tribute to the band, rather than make their own lame version of it. Still, It's kind of weird to hear his voice instead of John's, and I do miss Paul's raw counter-vocals along with the "Shoo-be-do-was". And of course, it doesn't have RINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Happy Birthday John Lennon, Great tribute by Stone Temple Pilots.

  • Anyone playing and singing, especially a guy as blatantly weeping as Scott Weiland, is alright by me. Stone Temple Pilots' Sour Girl, enough said. Don't get me started on Meatplow!

  • Takes a group with real talent to pull off a cover that well.

    STP have well earned their rightful place in Rcok 'N' Roll history.

    Great Band!

  • All it needed was some "shooby-do-wah"s.

  • The best I've heard with the exception of the Beatles.

  • The audience isnt standing up and going yeahhhh :)

    are they all dummys sitting there watching stp perform revolution?

  • awesome!, very nice cover

  • Scott is GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I am a DIE HARD BEATLES Fan, And I HATE COVER'S...I WAS THERE In THE 60's...BUT THIS BAND DID THIS GOOD. They Were FAITHFUL To THE Song. GREAT.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • were and when was this ???

  • @fullfloat

    Oct 2nd, 2001 at Radio City Music Hall in NYC

    I would know as I was there. :)

    Also remember this as being the best performance of the evening by far.

    Probably helped it was also much louder than the others but also because it was spot on in my book.

  • @spreetaper thanks

  • are we REALLY going to get anyone else like john lennon? this is a DAMNED good cover.

  • nice not exactly like John Lennon with The Beatles but hey close enough right this still rocks just the same i love this song

  • No matter who sings it all is good, but John lennon Is the Kick-ass F***ing Orignal

  • yeah i'll lol whenever i want to there "onthemoveagain" not like i give a shit what ppl say on here anyway lofuckinl, and I guess i should rephrase, Paul Mccartney sucks, John Lennon was the shit. Oh and deathkingmaster99.....no sir i absolutely do not suck, i'm actually quite awesome

  • Awesome band, great cover, standing ovation. I would love to been there. Now thats a fucking stellar performance.

  • Comment removed

  • keeping the beatles alive with this one... go stp great remake kept it original to love this song more now than ever when they debuted it...

  • the beatles suck lol stp fucking are gods

  • @pearljamcalgaryfan hahahahaha what u smoking there sonny? beatles are number then it is open for debate....stp does rule tho

  • @octobermadison Pink Floyd is twoo... Then it's up for debate. I'd probably even go and say Zeppelin is third

  • @bejerama Neither Pink Floyd or Led Zeppelin came even close to becoming the genius songwriters that Lennon & McCartney were. When did either of those two bands write a song as good as Yesterday, For No One, A Day In The Life, etc? The list goes on and on. Those two bands wrote a lot of good music, but nowhere comparable to the songwriting talents of Paul & John. It's not even debatable. Those were great rock bands with great music, but they werent on the same level when it comes to songwriting.

  • @ShelterDogs I just said I'd like to think Pink Floyd came close. I love their music too much. I actually really don't like listening to beatles much at all... But their influence and genius is undeniable.

  • @bejerama I understand. I love Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin, too. You could even say that Led Zeppelin was a better rock band than The Beatles. I bet you're surprised I'd say that. Why? Because The Beatles quit touring by 1966. So it's hard to give them "great rock band" status. However, I still stand by my opinion that The Beatles had the best songwriting. They're compositions will one day be heard the same way we listen to Bach and Beethoven today. The same won't be said about Floyd/Zep.

  • @pearljamcalgaryfan

    'The Beatles suck lol'??

    Well actually YOU SUCK and if you want to 'laugh out loud' at that one then go for it.

  • @pearljamcalgaryfan YOU SUCK

  • If you lisson to this then american englishes version then the beatles version you can completly tell the difference

  • @baalHunter--this was like a week or two after 9/11, at a benefit or tribute...i don't know if they were very comfortable dancing around with rubble and corpses a few blocks away, lol

  • @ladyphoenix7 a lot of americans were prettty comfy with those corpses in the ruins of WTC , making out plans of how to turn that into a great money making machine (Iraq war) .

  • this guys voice souds like an walrus

  • @unchearted it's a walrus

    

  • Wow I never heard STP do this! Pretty amazing!

  • Damn thats one awesome cover :D

  • much better than their studio cover!

  • lol wheres the energy in the performance, they can play well enough to dance around and get into the song a little bit

  • i think is a good performace and when you guys played this song i think you weren´t beleaven better than the baetles, instate that you respet that band i think

  • This is 2000 or 2001

  • Man i think this is a good cover but not even could get close to the Beatles (Greatest Band Ever) impossible get close to the Beatles

  • Well the beatles are a hard act to follow.....Overall not a bad version they seem to have made it there own....they are showing some respect...... check out the cheap trick beatles covers

  • the beatles are the best!

  • scott.

  • Wonderful singer, wonderful band, wonderful cover. Lousy faultfinders.

  • @parapeticouro Why dont the faultfinders try singing this song the post it here on youtube?

  • @parapeticouro They like to find fault cause they can't sing like Scott..

  • este no es el mismo fracasado que quiso reemplazar a AXL ROSE?

  • nunca pero nunca compares, a scoot, con axl, weiland, es el mejor cantante de los 90's , not q.s ask

  • huuraaahhh stone temple piltoss!!!! they aer the man!!

  • he killed it....the beatles did it 100000 times better

  • I'm going to comment on the song and vid, as opposed to previous arguments.

    One of my favorite songs by my favorite band. And this cover version isn't that bad. It stays true and respects the original.

  • Great song, but doesn't really fit with his voice.

  • wow fuck the beatles?..lmao. fuck these faggots. i just went to this vid to listen to beatles covers to prove to my friend how many bands respect them and are inspired by them. So ianmiscool6969, suck a penis.

  • i cant wait to see some of the responses to this :) B-) ;)

  • your opinion will be hated by many sir.

  • pretty much the dumbest comment I have ever read. When STP comes with a billion album sales of the beatles, influences as many artists and paves the way for generationS of bands ahead of them, then you might have a legitimate argument. Dont give me no crap on grunge, that last all of what, 3 years?

  • First off, crack open a fucking English book, because you're typing like a god damn retard. Second off, your comment is full of much more fail than just simpleton typos. Hope you realize, without the Beatles, no STP, and that quite a few STP songs are pretty much Beatles' rip offs. As STP is one of my favortie bands and the Beatles not so much, still, you're one ignorant moron to spew such naive contradictory bullshit on this video.

  • Beatles rip offs? More like influence. Unless you can tell which songs of STP's sound exactly like Strawberry Fields.

  • @maximusrex1979 Hmmm well, Lady Picture Show is one song that comes to mind as a Beatles wanna be song, even though it's my favorite song from them.

  • Great Song!

  • For all you assholes giving these guys shit for COVERING this song............

    It's called a cover, not a karaoke.

  • This is amazing....SIKE! ewyyy The Beatles rocked this you ruined it

  • he sings like a surfer in california.

  • fggot ass band cant sing for shit

  • i have to agree with you. they screwed up this song, the singer can go to hell for it.

    i also know you mother fuckers are going to give me a thumbs down for this. so if you do, my instant reply is: thank you ya fucking poser.

  • as do you (:

  • you swallow, so shut the fuck up

  • well those "damn hippies" are consitered the greatest music group of all time, no other band has ever come close to the accomplishments the beatles have had, like them or not, they are still the best

  • @PopCultureSucks I'd like to think Floyd came close

  • Fucking sucks every time some band tries a beatles song they just stab it in the heart and kill it

  • Have you ever heard Hendrix's cover of Day Tripper for Radio 1? He didn't stab it in the heart. He gave it life.

  • Freaking lame. Not the song, or the video, just the fact that the guitarist has on a Texas shirt.

  • Scott sings this well.

  • Fucking love Stone Temple Pilots, and this is a great cover. The Beatles are the greatest. I'll bet John Lennon would appreciate this cover anyway.

  • Pretty good, but the vocals are not fit for the song. I'm not saying he's not a good singer, I just think that his type of singing is not great for the song. Pretty good rendition all in all though. Its good, but I would pick the original over this any day.

  • What are you talking about? His voice practically sounds like Lennon's here. Sure the original's better, but the vocal style and tone is exactly the same.

  • SIKE! um actually it doesn't sound anything like Lennon if you were a true fan of him or The Beatles youd see that

  • I really do enjoy The Beatles and have listened to them for a long time. I have also heard this song performed by The Beatles in many different settings and I've also heard it covered many times, and this is easily one of the best. I do enjoy The Beatles original more, but the vocal tone and style is practically the same in this cover. I know I'm not tone deaf and I can't hear any clear differences beyond the very small differences in pitch and the fact that Scott's voice is noticeably raspier.

  • If you can tell me musically what is wrong with this cover, I'd be glad to hear it.

  • Just give me the audio and I could have been fooled with the vocals..

  • lol then obviously you dont know what johns voice sounds like, john doesnt sound gay hahaha.

  • Good, but nothing compared to the original.

  • when was this?

  • i love that the audience gave them a standing ovation

  • Comment removed

  • Amazing, but nothing compares to the Beatles

  • Damn good!

  • You know a song is good when it can consistently make an impact on you, even with these guys playing.

  • Scott is amazin!

  • Everything Scott Does is just so bad ass.

  • Nothing like the real John Lennon on that one, but it is a great performance.

  • scott weiland fuckin kicks ass