Vote No On Prop 5 (b)

[POPEWORSHIPER]

Of course the police chief is against prop 5, his career and his officers careers depend on their ability to incarcerate non-violent criminals. There will be less job opportunities for uneducated cops & corrections officers who depend on the police/corrections institutions to provide great pay for having no education.

[pusch420]

VOTE YES, police chiefs are against it because their careers depend on prohibtion-and we pay their wages

[hypeblast]

Vote YES.. these are physco ass cops and prosecutors. ( no souls )

vote yes, everyone deserves a second chance.

who are you to hate anyone or point fingers these are non- violent crimes.

why waste millions on stupid jails

waste money on school education

vote yes. because everyone deserve a chance??

[XAnihilator]

LOL @ 0:31

[Jeckler2008]

i know that's all i got out of this bullshit display....freakin cracks me up that the sign fell

[musicteacher8]

Thanks guys, I'm saving this one. LMFAO!

[xboxizdope]

Hopefully this bill will fall faster than their sign on the podium, haha. Why should we listen to a cop on this issue? This will reduce the need for cops, of course he's going to be against it!

[pier49er]

Haha

[davisthc4]

hell yeah brother

smoke weed every day :)

[chiva187]

How did someone so fucking stupid get this far in life? Remeber a pig, I mean a police officer is allowed to lie to you, you are not!

[Kallepash]

Apparently you need to re-read the proposition...

Or have an attorney go over the actual wording with you.

Only non-violent offenders are eligible for the diversion programs implemented in Prop 5 - thieves, wife beaters, and other violent criminals are not eligible for early release under the proposed programs.

[Kallepash]

People from Fresno are obviously crazy.

The drug war doesn't keep people safe - it threatens them.

Check out LEAP (dot) cc

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

You're a disgrace to law enforcement, Mr. Dyer.