@WeWentToTheMoon69 Talk about IGNORANCE-seems to me that u talk the cake win the prize.
Tell me how AN ASCENT POD(tiny little piece of shit craft)- caught up to the CM that was doing 4000MPH around the moon & SOMEHOW was able to RENDEZ-VOUS with it at 4000MPH???? USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN-IT'S IMPOSSIBLE MOONTARD-FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE.especally in 1969. lol they can't even do it NOW.Your ignorance is astounding. AND THEN, fly back 240,000 miles on FUMES. lol NOONE HAS EVER BEEN TO THE MOON DUMMY.
"Both of which are NASA facilities and thus, should not be counted as independent verification".
Jarrah, how about the Bochum Observatory in Germany? From 1957 until the mid-seventies the station received transmissions from both Soviet and American space-vehicles. It picked up and recorded several Apollo missions. The observatory received some of the CTV transmissions from the Rovers on the moon, as well as telemetry such as biomedical data and also voice-transmissions.
Jarrah, ofcourse the Bochum Observatory director Tilo Elsner nowadays is working together with 'a' project with NASA. Strange? No. They are in space-business. But did Heinz Kaminski, director in 1969, do that? Nope, he did not. Because the Bochum Observatory was INDEPENDENT at the time.
Even lunar photograph showing a shiny dot with a LONGGG shadow stretching from it, just like this Aussie nitwit claimed JAXA COULD NOT make (see his job on SELENE photos), even when they GET those photos, you loonies call them "Pixellated (sic) garbage"
Maybe the Mother Ship will someday come to iake you away, and stop off at the moon so you can see the truth.
Funny how anything dumb sounds about one order od magnitude less intelligent when spoken in a thick Aussie accent.
There are now photographs taken from lunar orbit showing the lower stages of the LM for Apollo 11 and 12, as well as Apollo 12 ALSEP, even foot trails left by Apollo 12.
how can you believe that pixelated GARBAGE. millions of dollars and they come up with pics that are the same quality of 1960. i'm glad my tax dollars aren't going towards that crap. and it takes a big man to make fun of somebody's accent. piss on you, you brainwashed ignoramus
because those scientists would be ridiculed and drummed out of their jobs if they said anything. like many us citizens, they are owned; so they play dumb and don't say a thing.
Are you serious Mathius? Have you any idea how many scientists worldwide (!) are involved?
Every (real) scientist is eagerly searching for new facts or undiscovered items. So it would be obvious that if there was a fakery a lot of scientists would have discovered it. Without doubt. Because that's what scientists do. Not to mention the hundreds of thousands students at universities worldwide.
"It wouldn't surprise me if Jarrah makes a video using text from the bible and shows it to us as 'proof' for the 'fakery of NASA'."
I challenge you to provide a shred of evidence that I follow the bible or use pieces from it to prove Apollo was faked. Otherwise retract this statement. People who know me personally know that I am an atheist.
You are surprised than no single HAM tracked the Lunar missions to the Moon and back. They have never claimed to! The equipment in use by HAMs was not that sensitive compared to large tracking stations, and even NASA could not track from a single station
@delahaye100 As JW knows but conveniently glosses over, Apollo was not continuously visible at any one station during its entire trip to the moon. And this may come as a shock to the younger readers like JW, but personal computers capable of computing Apollo's position were not available to individual hams in 1969-1972. Once Apollo reached the moon, it became easy - just point the antenna at the moon and it will bring in everything on the surface or in orbit on the near side.
JW refers to the QST article in a totally misleading way. What he keeps referring to as "sources" are not sources at all they are "references" to equipment that was being used etc.JW is once again bending the truth to fit his ideas.
Come on moon movies you can run but you can't hide.
What did you say to swector when you found out he was linking his webpage with an e-mail address that should have been a domain name for your website.
I wonder if moonmovies had to buy their domain name back from swector because his e-mail address for his criticaly aclaimed videos used to be moonmovies dot google or something?
I'm suprised Bart didn't secure all the moonmovies domain names with that 1million dollars he spent watching only Apollo 11 footage
@WeWentToTheMoon69 Talk about IGNORANCE-seems to me that u talk the cake win the prize.
Tell me how AN ASCENT POD(tiny little piece of shit craft)- caught up to the CM that was doing 4000MPH around the moon & SOMEHOW was able to RENDEZ-VOUS with it at 4000MPH???? USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN-IT'S IMPOSSIBLE MOONTARD-FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE.especally in 1969. lol they can't even do it NOW.Your ignorance is astounding. AND THEN, fly back 240,000 miles on FUMES. lol NOONE HAS EVER BEEN TO THE MOON DUMMY.
cadu1995 1 year ago
"Both of which are NASA facilities and thus, should not be counted as independent verification".
Jarrah, how about the Bochum Observatory in Germany? From 1957 until the mid-seventies the station received transmissions from both Soviet and American space-vehicles. It picked up and recorded several Apollo missions. The observatory received some of the CTV transmissions from the Rovers on the moon, as well as telemetry such as biomedical data and also voice-transmissions.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Bochum Observatory is discussed in Part 4.
watch?v=-LVeKGfORvc
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Jarrah, ofcourse the Bochum Observatory director Tilo Elsner nowadays is working together with 'a' project with NASA. Strange? No. They are in space-business. But did Heinz Kaminski, director in 1969, do that? Nope, he did not. Because the Bochum Observatory was INDEPENDENT at the time.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Great work Jarrah.
wearechangela 2 years ago
See?
Even lunar photograph showing a shiny dot with a LONGGG shadow stretching from it, just like this Aussie nitwit claimed JAXA COULD NOT make (see his job on SELENE photos), even when they GET those photos, you loonies call them "Pixellated (sic) garbage"
Maybe the Mother Ship will someday come to iake you away, and stop off at the moon so you can see the truth.
Yeah, yeah, I am SO brainwashed.
It's "sel-UH-nee", nitwit. Even in Aussie.
LOL/
Is the "X" for "eXtremely ignorant"?
amparion 2 years ago
no, it's for Xtremely glad i'm not you.
MathiusX 2 years ago
What about the shiny dot with the long shadow? What did it look like to you?
wearechangela 2 years ago
Funny how anything dumb sounds about one order od magnitude less intelligent when spoken in a thick Aussie accent.
There are now photographs taken from lunar orbit showing the lower stages of the LM for Apollo 11 and 12, as well as Apollo 12 ALSEP, even foot trails left by Apollo 12.
Of course, these hoaxers will never believe it.
Pathetic.
Deluded anti-intellectual trash.
Piss on em.
Pess
On
Em
amparion 2 years ago
how can you believe that pixelated GARBAGE. millions of dollars and they come up with pics that are the same quality of 1960. i'm glad my tax dollars aren't going towards that crap. and it takes a big man to make fun of somebody's accent. piss on you, you brainwashed ignoramus
MathiusX 2 years ago
@amparion asshole-the lro shows NOTHING-U MOONTARD PARROTS WOULD FALL FOR ANYTHING.lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
Once again:
where are all the scientists that doubt the moonlandings of Apollo?
Why is it that only a few YouTube-detectives, conspiracy-theorists and political distrusters believe in this ridiculous hoax?
Do you know?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"where are all the scientists that doubt the moonlandings of Apollo?"
I already told you that David Groves has a PhD and Bill Wood has a BCs. Both doubt Apollo.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
So that's about it? Now that means a very strong opposition!
It's becoming a little pathetic.
Rob260259 2 years ago
because those scientists would be ridiculed and drummed out of their jobs if they said anything. like many us citizens, they are owned; so they play dumb and don't say a thing.
MathiusX 2 years ago
Are you serious Mathius? Have you any idea how many scientists worldwide (!) are involved?
Every (real) scientist is eagerly searching for new facts or undiscovered items. So it would be obvious that if there was a fakery a lot of scientists would have discovered it. Without doubt. Because that's what scientists do. Not to mention the hundreds of thousands students at universities worldwide.
Rob260259 2 years ago
True Delahaye. It wouldn't surprise me if Jarrah makes a video using text from the bible and shows it to us as 'proof' for the 'fakery of NASA'.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"It wouldn't surprise me if Jarrah makes a video using text from the bible and shows it to us as 'proof' for the 'fakery of NASA'."
I challenge you to provide a shred of evidence that I follow the bible or use pieces from it to prove Apollo was faked. Otherwise retract this statement. People who know me personally know that I am an atheist.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"It wouldn't surprise me if Jarrah makes a video using text from the bible and shows it to us as 'proof' for the 'fakery of NASA'"
That is what I wrote. IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"JW is once again bending the truth to fit his ideas."
Did you expect something else?
Rob260259 2 years ago
You are surprised than no single HAM tracked the Lunar missions to the Moon and back. They have never claimed to! The equipment in use by HAMs was not that sensitive compared to large tracking stations, and even NASA could not track from a single station
delahaye100 2 years ago
@delahaye100 As JW knows but conveniently glosses over, Apollo was not continuously visible at any one station during its entire trip to the moon. And this may come as a shock to the younger readers like JW, but personal computers capable of computing Apollo's position were not available to individual hams in 1969-1972. Once Apollo reached the moon, it became easy - just point the antenna at the moon and it will bring in everything on the surface or in orbit on the near side.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
JW refers to the QST article in a totally misleading way. What he keeps referring to as "sources" are not sources at all they are "references" to equipment that was being used etc.JW is once again bending the truth to fit his ideas.
delahaye100 2 years ago
Do you know ANYTHING about this comment Buzz Aldrin made that had to be cut from Astros Gone Wild or did I mishear Bart Sibrel on Coast To Coast?
greenmagoos 2 years ago
I just would have thought it would have been wise to secure all the moonmovies domains names for your website.
You wouldn't pass the Dragons Den if you didn't secure all your websites domain names in case anybody tried to muscle in is all I'm saying.
greenmagoos 2 years ago
Come on moon movies you can run but you can't hide.
What did you say to swector when you found out he was linking his webpage with an e-mail address that should have been a domain name for your website.
moonmovies dot ....................?????????
greenmagoos 2 years ago
Ah Bart Sibrel. The man with all the answers.
I wonder if moonmovies had to buy their domain name back from swector because his e-mail address for his criticaly aclaimed videos used to be moonmovies dot google or something?
I'm suprised Bart didn't secure all the moonmovies domain names with that 1million dollars he spent watching only Apollo 11 footage
greenmagoos 2 years ago
im going to call him now and ask about it!
moontrue 2 years ago
'im going to call him now and ask about it! '
Who are you calling moontrue?
greenmagoos 2 years ago
hehe sorry Sven Grahn msg me if u wanna add some quotations
moontrue 2 years ago
"Tracked to the Moon and back"-claim is sinking BAD now...
I wasn't expecting this. I was thinking NASA arranged some "independent" amateurs who monitored their flight. That would have been a good proof.
Aurinkohirvi 2 years ago 4
Good job, I like it.
tmnt2105 2 years ago 3